UNIVERSITY OF DELHI

Gargi College

Submitted By: Akshita Jain

Roll number: 212810
Course: B.A(hons) Political science
Year and section: 3rd – A, 6th Semester
Submitted To: DR. MANEESHA ROY

Paper: Development Process and social movements in

contemporary India

Q: Critically examine and evaluate the causes, objective

and impact of economic reforms on the Indian economy over
the past three decades.

1
Economic Reforms: Introduction
“When India grows, the world grows, when India reforms, the world transforms”.
Though economic liberalization in India can be traced back to the late 1970s, economic reforms
began in earnest only in July 1991. A balance of payments crisis at the time opened the way for
an International Monetary Fund (IMF) program that led to the adoption of a major reform
package. Though the foreign-exchange reserve recovered quickly and ended effectively the
temporary clout of the IMF and World Bank, reforms continued in a stop-go fashion.
India’s economy was characterized by excessive regulation, protectionism, and a centrally
planned strategy prior to economic reforms in the early 1990s. Enterprises were vigorously
constrained by the public authority through licenses, grants, and portions, prompting failure, low
efficiency, and an absence of development. The economy was likewise intensely dependent on
farming, with restricted industrialization and an enormous casual area. The meaning of monetary
changes lies in their part in changing India’s financial scene. Initiated in 1991, the reforms aimed
to liberalize the economy, make it more open to foreign investment, and lessen the amount of
government intervention. Key changes included changing exchange and venture strategies,
liberating businesses, privatizing state-possessed endeavors, and modernizing the monetary area.
These changes significantly affect India’s development direction. They prodded higher monetary
development rates, expanded efficiency, and pulled in unfamiliar venture. The advancement of
exchange and venture arrangements worked with combination into the worldwide economy,
prompting expanded sends out and unfamiliar trade saves. Privatization and liberation carried
proficiency and development to beforehand stale areas. By and large, financial changes play had
a critical impact in forming India’s development story, progressing it from a sluggish developing,
vigorously controlled economy to one of the world’s quickest developing significant economies.
In any case, challenges remain, including tending to disparity, further developing framework, and
cultivating comprehensive development.
The monetary changes In India, started in 1991, were a reaction to the nation’s equilibrium of
installments emergency and stale financial development. Before progression, India followed a
blended economy model with weighty government mediation, portrayed by the Permit Raj,
which expected organizations to get licenses for pretty much every part of creation, and Import
Replacement Industrialization (ISI), which intended to diminish dependence on imports by
advancing homegrown creation through defensive duties and import limitations. However, these
policies led to widespread corruption, slow growth, and inefficiency. The monetary changes
acquainted in 1991 pointed with destroy the Permit Raj, change exchange and speculation
approaches, and empower private area cooperation. Key changes included diminishing exchange
obstructions, privatizing state-possessed undertakings, liberating ventures, and changing the
unfamiliar trade framework. These changes released the capability of the Indian economy,
prompting higher development rates, expanded unfamiliar venture, and combination into the
worldwide economy.

2
India launched an economic reform initiative with two categories of measures:
Macroeconomic Stabilization: All economic actions, both domestic and external, that are
designed to boost the overall demand of the economy are known as macroeconomic stabilisation
measures.
Jobs: Quality and high-quality jobs must be created to increase the disposable income of the
general population and support the surge in domestic demand.
Structural Reform: All policy actions undertaken by the government to improve the overall
demand of goods and services within the economy. Of course, this includes loosening the
economy’s constraints so that it can unlock its own potential for higher productivity and output.

Liberalization
India’s economic reform began in 1991 with financial reform, and liberalization indicates the
continuation of economic reform. The term “privatization” and “liberalization” refer to the
reduction in government regulation and the removal of the government’s control over the state.
Industries and businesses are given more autonomy and the government is no longer involved in
decision-making. Policymakers believed that the power of supply and demand would bring
efficiency to the market and help the economy grow. The new reforms in the financial sector
were introduced internally by reducing the state’s control. The objectives are to increase
competition among domestic businesses, promote foreign trade and regulate export and import,
develop the country’s global market, reduce the country’s debt, and encourage the private sector
to participate in the growth of the economy. The implementation of liberalization policy in India
has had a significant impact on several sectors, as well as a few economic reforms. The
following reforms were initiated by the Government of India as part of the liberalisation policy:
Deregulation of the Industrial sector, Financial sector Reforms, Tax Reforms, Foreign Exchange
Reforms, Trade and Investment Policy Reforms, External sector Reforms, Foreign exchange
Reforms, and Foreign Trade Policy Reforms.
 Financial Sector Reforms – The aim of financial sector reforms is to establish a
streamlined financial system that enhances the effective allocation of resources, fosters
financial inclusion, safeguards trust in the financial system, and ensures its stability.
 Tax Reforms – Tax reform involves modifying the methods of tax collection or
administration by the government. This is typically done to enhance tax management or
to offer economic and social advantages.
 Trade and Investment Policy Reforms – Under this reform, the mandate for acquiring
licenses was eliminated for all industries except those related to alcohol, cigarettes,
hazardous chemicals, industrial explosives, electronics, aerospace, and drugs and

3
 pharmaceuticals. The necessity for licenses for establishing new units or expanding
existing ones has been removed.
 External Sector Reforms – It encompasses a range of policy actions and structural
adjustments, designed to enhance the effectiveness, competitiveness, and robustness of
the external sector. These include measures like trade liberalisation, management of
exchange rates, regulations governing foreign investments, and initiatives for boosting
exports.
 Deregulation of the Industrial Sector – In the industrial sector, deregulation involves the
removal of barriers to entry, reduction of monopolistic practices, and creation of a more
competitive and market-driven environment. This process refers to the systematic
reduction or elimination of government regulations and controls on businesses and
industries.
 Foreign Exchange Reforms – Foreign exchange reforms were set in motion in 1991
through the devaluation of the Indian rupee in relation to foreign currencies. As a result, a
US dollar or British pound could now fetch a greater number of rupees compared to
earlier, signifying that these foreign currencies can procure a greater quantity of goods
within the Indian market.
 Foreign Trade Policy Reforms – The recently announced Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) of
India, initiated by Commerce Minister Shri Piyush Goyal which becomes effective from
1st April , 2023, aims to enhance India’s integration into global value chains and establish
the nation as a prominent export hub.

Impact of Liberalization in India

The execution of any policy inevitably brings about positive changes in the market. The
implementation of the Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization (LPG) policy in India was
aimed at enhancing the Indian economy, and it proved to be successful as the economy
experienced rapid growth. However, alongside the positive aspects of this reform, there are also
some negative implications.

Positive impacts of liberalization include:

1. Capital flow: Liberalization has improved the flow of capital, making it more affordable
for companies to obtain capital from investors. This has enabled them to undertake
lucrative projects that were previously unattainable due to the high cost of capital before
liberalization.
2. Stock market performance: The relaxation of laws and taxation policies in a country often
leads to a rise in stock market prices. This provides a platform for the real-time trading of
corporate securities.

4
 3. Introduction of FDI in the banking sector: Allowing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in
banks and insurance companies has reduced the government’s stake in these sectors.
4. Reduction in political risks: The initiation of liberalization policies in India has reduced
political risks for investors. Liberalization attracts foreign policies more easily, and a
strong legal framework in the country facilitates smooth business operations.
5. Diversification for investors: In a liberalized economy, investors benefit from the ability
to invest their assets in a diversified portfolio.
6. Agricultural impact: The agricultural sector has undergone various changes, but the
government still maintains significant control over the entire agricultural process, from
production to distribution. Therefore, the impact of liberalization on this sector is yet to
be fully realized.
Overall, the impact of liberalization in India has been largely positive, with improvements in
capital flow, stock market performance, reduction in political risks, and opportunities for
diversification. However, there are still areas, such as the agricultural sector, where the effects of
liberalization are yet to be fully seen.
Negative consequences of liberalization in India:
1. The redistribution of economic power has had a significant impact on the stability of India’s
economy, leading to its diminishing state.
2. Multinational threat: Prior to 1991, multinational corporations had little presence in the Indian
market. However, with the liberalization policies, competition has intensified, posing a threat to
domestic firms as multinational companies operate on a larger scale across different countries.
3. Technological influence: The advancement of technology has compelled small and medium
industries in India to adapt to these changes in order to stay competitive.
4. Rise in mergers and acquisitions: The frequency of mergers and acquisitions has seen a rapid
increase in recent times. Small companies are frequently merging with larger ones, requiring
extensive reskilling for the employees of the smaller firms. This reskilling period not only
hampers productivity but also puts a burden on the company’s capital.

Privatization
The transfer of ownership, property or business from the government to the
private sector is termed privatization. The government ceases to be the
owner of the entity or business.

The process in which a publicly-traded company is taken over by a few

people is also called privatization. The stock of the company is no longer

5
traded in the stock market and the general public is barred from holding
stake in such a company. The company gives up the name 'limited' and
starts using 'private limited' in its last name.

The process of privatization reform Involves the transfer of ownership,

control, and management of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) or Public Sector
Undertakings (PSUs) to private entities. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

 Policy Framework: Privatization typically begins with the

formulation of a policy framework that outlines the
objectives, methods, and timeline for the privatization
process. This framework often includes criteria for
selecting enterprises for privatization, such as financial
performance, strategic importance, and market conditions.
 Enterprise Evaluation: The government evaluates the SOEs
or PSUs slated for privatization to determine their financial
health, asset value, market position, and potential for
restructuring. This evaluation helps establish pricing and
identify potential buyers.
 Stakeholder Consultation: Consultation with stakeholders,
including employees, unions, investors, and the public, is
crucial to address concerns, gather feedback, and build
support for privatization.
 Legal and Regulatory Reforms: Governments may need to
enact or amend laws and regulations to facilitate
privatization, including those related to competition, labor,
and taxation.
 Transaction Planning: Thorough planning is crucial for the
successful execution of privatization transactions. This
entails carefully selecting the most suitable method of

6
 privatization, such as public offerings, strategic sales, asset
sales, or vouchers. Additionally, it involves establishing
timelines and identifying potential investors.

 Transparency and Accountability: Ensuring transparency

throughout the privatization process is of utmost
importance in order to maintain fairness, prevent
corruption, and foster trust among stakeholders.
Governments must provide clear and comprehensive
information regarding the rationale behind privatization,
the criteria used for selection, and the terms of the
transactions.
 Asset Restructuring and Preparation: Prior to privatization,
State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) or Public Sector Units
(PSUs) may require restructuring to enhance their appeal to
investors. This may involve divesting non-core assets,
streamlining operations, improving governance practices,
and addressing any legacy issues such as debt or pension
liabilities.
 Bid Evaluation and Selection: Governments evaluate bids
from potential buyers based on various criteria, including
financial capacity, strategic alignment, commitment to job
retention, and plans for investment and growth.
 Transaction Execution: Once a buyer has been selected, the
transaction is executed through legally binding agreements,
such as share purchase agreements or asset transfer

7
 agreements. The transfer of ownership, control, and
management responsibilities takes place in accordance with
the negotiated terms.
 Post-Privatization Monitoring: Governments closely
monitor the performance of privatized enterprises to ensure
compliance with contractual obligations, safeguard public
interests, and address any emerging issues. This may
involve regulatory oversight, reporting requirements, and
periodic evaluations.
 Social Safety Nets: To mitigate the social impact of
privatization, governments may implement measures such
as retraining programs, unemployment assistance, or social
safety nets to support affected workers and communities.
 Evaluation and Learning: Following the completion of
privatization transactions, governments evaluate the
outcomes to assess the effectiveness of the reforms
implemented. This evaluation process helps in identifying
areas for improvement and learning from the experience.
Need for Safety Nets
Privatization promotes economic efficiency and growth, which
strengthens macroeconomic adjustment. In the short term,
however, this can lead to job losses and wage cuts for workers,
as well as to higher consumer prices. This article discusses those
effects and the tax implications of privatization. It then examines
different methods of privatization, noting that public sales and
auctions can have a more negative effect on workers but can

8
maximize government revenue. Options for policymakers to
mitigate the social effects of privatization are mapped and
lessons learned from adjustment programs are reviewed.
Economic adjustment programs use a variety of macroeconomic
policies to correct domestic and foreign economic imbalances
and create conditions for growth in a stable macroeconomic
environment. Macroeconomic policy is complemented by
structural reforms aimed at making macroeconomic adjustment
more sustainable and improving its quality. Restructuring and
privatization of state-owned enterprises is one of the many
structural reforms found in adjustment programs. (Other reforms
typically focus on tax systems and tax administration, price
liberalization, the financial sector, and trade liberalization.)
State-owned enterprises, especially in developing countries, tend
to be overstaffed, pay excessive wages, and have low
productivity. As a result, these companies are often budget
drains and growth decelerators. Privatization and other structural
reforms have therefore seen economic efficiency and growth.
However, some structural reforms may have a negative social
impact, at least in the short term. Privatization can be associated
with, for example, job losses and employee wage cuts, as well as
rising consumer prices. In this regard, IMF policy advice has
increasingly sought to address these and similar issues in its
supported programs. As a result, many IMF-supported programs
have included cost-effective social safety nets to protect and
support the vulnerable during the adjustment period. Their
access to basic public services.
9
The main purpose of social safety nets is to mitigate the short-
term negative effects of macroeconomic and structural policies
on the consumption of disadvantaged people. Safeguards have
taken many forms, including targeting subsidies to those whose
real incomes are significantly reduced, providing severance pay
and temporary employment to those who lose their jobs, and
adapting existing social security systems. The design of social
safety nets is expected to take into account. Consider the
composition of affected populations; potential impact of
political reform initiatives; and economic, political and
administrative constraints.
Globalization
Globalization and its advantages can be felt across the globe,
paying little heed to where on earth you are perusing this article
from. It has helped individuals from around the world to
associate more than ever. In particular, globalization has
prepared for organizations to extend such that was unimaginable
on a nearby scale. Notwithstanding, there is one country that has
felt maybe the biggest effect of the globalization peculiarity —
India. Known for having quite possibly of the biggest populace
on the planet, India has rapidly turned into an extraordinary
wellspring of work in the innovation area and is at present the 6th
biggest economy on the planet. In 2021, it partook in an
ostensible Gross domestic product of $3.17 trillion at a
development pace of 8.9%. Notwithstanding, due to its huge
populace of 1.41 billion individuals, India’s ostensible Gross

10
domestic product per capita is the least of the main 10 world
economies — $2,277.
What is globalization?
Markets, political and social designs, and social practices have
been progressively interwoven all over the planet since the
second piece of the twentieth hundred years. This is a peculiarity
known as “globalization”. While this word is most frequently
used to portray the course of worldwide monetary incorporation,
it can likewise be utilized to depict issues of social arrangement
and global relations. The process by which a company or other
organization either begins to operate on a global scale or
increases its influence in the nations in which it conducts
business has come to be referred to as “globalization,” especially
in the context of contemporary economics. As many individuals
see the advantages of globalization, it has many supporters.
Because of globalization, a greater part of individuals all over
the planet have had the option to partake in the products of
present day innovations imagined on the opposite side of the
planet. Smartphones made by Apple and Google are used by
people all over the world. Internet technologies like Zoom have
helped many businesses stay in business because they let people
from different countries connect with one another and do
business. Among a few highlights of globalization, one connects
with expanding communications among countries and expulsion
of boundaries to work with development of products, capital,
work and innovation. A cycle renders different exercises and

11
goal overall in degree or application. As a piece of this course of
expanding joining of the world, numerous nations have taken on
financial changes and progression in their own specific manners.
The quick coordination of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South
Africa into the world market was a significant component of
globalization. The primary manifestation of this expanding
integration and shifting organizational structure of the global
economy, which now involves a greater number of nations and
regions than in the past, is trade. In the comparative manner, it is
likewise significantly more serious as unfamiliar exchange
turned into a critical part of most nations monetary exercises.
Throughout the long term arising economies like China, India,
Brazil, Mexico, Russia and South Africa have made their
presence felt in the worldwide market and have approached as
new key drivers of worldwide development. China and India
have economies that are expanding at the fastest rate of all the
emerging nations. India with its unmistakable advancement
procedure can possibly impact financial exercises of the
worldwide economy in the years to come. With this foundation,
this study is an exploratory endeavor to quantify the quantum
jump in product and import to India, and to recognize changes in
ware arrangement and territorial examples of inflows and
outpourings of product exchange. The investigation relates to
four marks of time 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. The study’s
major findings include the following: (i) the manufacturing
sector’s share has increased relative to other tradable sectors; (ii)
production specialization and consumption diversification have
12
increased; and (iii) Indian trade is gradually shifting away from
low-value-added products. Trade Globalization When India
became independent in 1947, it exported 2% of the world’s
goods. Its chiefs accepted that globalization implied provincial
control. They looked for self‐sufficiency to acquire what they
saw as monetary freedom to brace political autonomy. Autarkic
strategies decreased India’s portion of worldwide products to
0.45 percent by 1986, yet this was cheered as an
accomplishment as opposed to being censured as a fiasco. By
1991, import obligations surpassed 300% on certain things, and
the import of numerous things was prohibited.

Economic reforms reduced import duties gradually from over

300 percent in 1991 to a simple average of 12 percent by FY
2010–2011

13
Remarkably, India has become a major exporter of services.
Historically, countries started as exporters of commodities,
graduated to manufactures, and ultimately achieved service
exports. Because of restrictive labor policies and poor
infrastructure, India never achieved its potential as a low‐cost
manufacturer of labor‐intensive products as the Asian tigers
once did. But India leapfrogged richer developing countries to
become a services exporter. This started with call centers and
computer software in the late 1990s, leading to a swift rise up
the value chain. During the Indian fiscal year 2022–2023 (which
began in April 2022 and ended after March 2023), India’s
services exports rose by more than 27 percent to $325 billion
while merchandise exports rose by just 5 percent to $452 billion
(Figure 3). Services exports look set to overtake merchandise
exports within a few years. India currently accounts for only 1.5
percent of global merchandise exports but 4.1 percent of global
services exports. India’s top software exporters—Infosys, Tata
Consultancy Services, and Cognizant—are world‐famous.
Impact of globalization
The impacts of urbanization and globalization on Indian culture
have been significant. The primary groundworks of the economy
owe an incredible arrangement on the choices made by
policymakers. Reserve funds, work, pay, and venture levels were
all urgently impacted by the monetary strategies set and
regulated by the public authority. Quite possibly of
globalization’s most huge impact on Indian culture is the spread

14
of cross-public mainstream society. It significantly affects the
nation’s way of life, society, government, and economy.
However, economic unity is the single most crucial component
in transforming a national economy into a global one. Here are
probably the greatest effects of globalization appreciated by
India today.
 More buyer decision Similar as different nations all over
the planet, globalization has assisted India and its kin with
appreciating more customer items than any other time.
These days, buyers have a more extensive determination of
items from a bigger assortment of brands to browse —
from neighborhood producers as well as from those all over
the planet. What’s more, because of the expanded
simplicity of transportation and delivery, the regular Indian
shopper can buy the most recent purchaser hardware at a lot
quicker rate, at a lot less expensive cost.
 Employment growth The ascent of MNCs venturing into
India has driven fairly to a blast in business open doors.
Expanded sends out because of the country’s overall
expense advantage underway brought about the making of
many new positions. Having less cutoff points on acquiring
and taking out cash has likewise assisted the occupation
with showcasing grow. In any case, the advancement of
present day innovation and the expanded requirement for
gifted, telecommuters have additionally supported business
possibilities in India.

15
  More disposable income- As a result of globalization,
salaries in India have increased. This is because
international businesses provide a high level of expertise
and experience. There was a change in the administration
structure, which brought about this opening of chance as
well as expanded compensation, as well. Due to India’s
recent economic revival and growth, which also led to
higher wages and other benefits for workers, many people
were able to escape utter poverty.
 Global market access As nations all over the planet
accessed India, India, thusly, accessed the worldwide
commercial center. Intrigued unfamiliar organizations are
rushing to India on account of the nation’s extending
globalization, which has made the country’s huge customer
market open to them. Then again, Indian organizations
have accessed a more prominent scope of innovations and
chances to foster specialty abilities. This brought about
more prominent inflows of unfamiliar capital for the nation
and its kin, both as portfolio speculation and direct venture.
The result was a brilliant ascent in the import-send out
business. A huge number of extra clients and potential
workers were made accessible to worldwide enterprises
right away, growing their abilities and market strength.

Social and Environmental Implications:

Examines the impact of reforms on poverty alleviation,
income distribution, and environmental sustainability.
16
 Confronted with a severe Balance of Payment crisis in 1991, the Indian government set
out on an financial change program favoring decentralization, de-bureaucratisation and
globalization. What started as a reaction to an financial emergency has driven to an
uncommon natural emergency that’s set to switch the little gains made within the final
three decades. The prime targets of the modern mechanical arrangement were to present
advancement measures to coordinated the Indian economy with the world economy,
annul confinements on coordinate remote speculation, free innate endeavor and
accomplish worldwide competitiveness.
The past 30 a long time can be to a great extent summed up as a story of fabulous
financial execution and fast natural corruption. Whereas India may have moved from a
low-income nation to a middle-income one, its development has not been ‘inclusive’. A
expansive number of destitute, underestimated and defenseless areas of the society have
been cleared out out of the growth handle. Whereas India might be on the way to
annihilating extraordinary destitution, it still slacks behind in other important
development pointers, particularly with respect to wellbeing and instruction. The changes
were to a great extent within the formal segment of the economy, the farming and
woodland subordinate communities did not see any changes driving to uneven
development and unequal dispersion.

In his 1991 budget discourse, Back Serve Manmohan Singh made an earnest statement:
“We cannot deforest our way to thriving, and we cannot contaminate our way to
prosperity.” These were prophetic words. Three decades afterward, timberlands nearly
two-thirds the measure of Haryana have been misplaced to infringements (15,000 sq km)
and 23,716 mechanical ventures (14,000 sq km), concurring to government information.
Fake timberlands cannot compensate the misfortune of biodiversity, as the government as
of late recognized. The increment in discuss and water contamination is basically from
press, steel, cement, coal, petroleum, manures, manufactured gums, plastic, counterfeit
strands and chemical businesses — all which benefitted from the changes.

The major nursery gasses (GHG) includeed to the environment as a result of expanded
mechanical exercises incorporate carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane
(CH4), nitrogen oxide (NOx), nitrous monoxide (N2O) and sulfur dioxide (SO2). In a
report distributed by Climate Observe (2018), India positioned among the world’s top-
five donors to GHG. India’s vehicle industry boomed after financial advancement, with a
host of collaborations between Indian companies and driving car producers around the
world. In conjunction with this boom there has been an increment within the levels of
discuss contamination. Twenty-one of the world’s 30 cities with the most noticeably
awful discuss pollution are in India. Discuss contamination in India has caused losses of

17
 up to Rs 7 lakh-crore ($95 billion) yearly, concurring to Confederation of Indian Industry
(CII).

In India, natural statutes, in spite of the fact that noteworthy in extend and scope, are
more regularly watched in breach than hone. Debasement, jurisdictional clashes and need
of co-ordination among diverse agencies has come about in destitute authorization. India
was positioned 168th out of 180 nations within the 2020 Natural Execution Record (EPI),
agreeing to analysts at Yale and Columbia colleges.
Interests, it is the courts, particularly the Incomparable Court and the National Green
Tribunal that played a essential part in tending to the natural emergency unleashed by
economic changes. The orders and headings of the pinnacle court cover a wide run of
ranges, whether it be discuss, water, strong squander or unsafe squander. But none of it is
sufficient to address the most noteworthy danger to India’s economy – climate alter.

The World Financial Forum's 2020 r”port’on worldwide dangers shows that biodiversity
and climate-related dangers are now widely acknowledged to be the dangers with the
most elevated likelihood and affect. India can not manage to have an confined climate
approach, or one that places trade interface over natural concerns — as the draft
Environment Affect Evaluation (EIA) Notice 2020 proposes. Nations around the world
are debating their forms of the green modern bargain. India must break from carbon-
centric Keynesian financial matters and adjust to the 21st-century vision for carbon
nonpartisanship:
Speculations in its provincial communities for woodland rebuilding coupled with
agroforestry, economical fisheries and cultivation, natural and low-carbon agriculture,
green occupations through renewable vitality, and energy-efficient green foundation.
It remains to be seen whether it is the government or the legal that recognize that in pith,
environment is economy. Separated from the commerce case, moving to an integrated
ecology-economy approach may be a matter of survival in an progressively uncertain
future.

Conclusion

If India grows at 6 percent per annum on a sustained basis, it will take 14 years to reach
the current level of per capita income of People’s Republic of China, 36 years to reach
Thailand’s, and 104 years to reach that of the United States. Thus, the need for
accelerated growth can hardly be overemphasized. At the same time, the task of
implementing reforms in a democracy is complex. Therefore, those wishing for rapid
reforms will need to be patient. The good news, however, is that the experience of the
past decade shows that change can occur. Moreover, the success of the reforms in
18
 delivering growth and poverty reduction must make the road to future reforms less
bumpy. The support for reforms today, though far from universal, is fortunately much
stronger than it was 10 years ago. Economic reforms are instrumental in shaping the
trajectory of a nation’s economic development. By adapting to changing circumstances,
addressing inefficiencies, and fostering a competitive and dynamic economic
environment, countries can position themselves for sustained growth and improved living
standards. Successful implementation of economic reforms requires strategic planning,
stakeholder collaboration, and a commitment to adaptability in the face of evolving
economic challenges.

Akshita Jain

19