Loyalty, Rewards and Value: What Do We Want From Our Customers?
Loyalty, Rewards and Value: What Do We Want From Our Customers?
Loyalty, Rewards and Value: What Do We Want From Our Customers?
michael mccall, Visiting scholar, cornell university center for Hospitality research David c. Ogden, Principal analytics consultant, sas
In a bid to encourage greater sales and return visits, the national caf chain instituted a customer loyalty program. For a nominal annual fee, patrons could enjoy discounts at any of the chains locations around the country. Customers loved it; what a great way to save money on their favorite coffee drinks. Company executives, though, were divided into two camps: (A) This is great; we now get customer data we wouldnt otherwise have had. (B) This doesnt bring in new revenues; the only customers willing to pay the upfront fee are the ones who knew they would recoup that fee the ones who would have been loyal, long-term customers anyway.
Loyalty and reward programs are typically designed to achieve four objectives: increase customer spending, improve retention, maintain competitive position and capture new customer data. but do such programs actually achieve those aims? theres no doubt that todays programs yield useful customer data, but what about the other objectives? as membership in such programs continues to increase, many firms are left wondering whether their programs buy loyalty and increase customer value, or simply add costs without securing repeat patronage. that was the topic of a December 2009 webcast sponsored by the cornell university center for Hospitality research and sas. In the onehour, interactive webcast: Michael McCall, Visiting scholar at the cornell university center for Hospitality research, presented some intriguing findings from his research on customer loyalty programs and just what they do (or dont do) for the companies that use them. David C. Ogden, Principal analytics consultant at sas, discussed how to measure the impact of customer loyalty programs on customer lifetime value essential knowledge for any company that hopes to use these programs to build profitability, not just to reel in more customers.
For all its popularity though, the s&H green stamps program didnt deliver much customer information that could be parlayed into smarter marketing. retailers had a general belief that customers preferred a business that offered green stamps, but they didnt know who those customers were, how frequently they purchased or anything else about them. the face of customer loyalty/reward programs changed dramatically when american airlines launched the aadvantage frequent flier program in 1981, mccall said. the first such loyalty program in the world, it remains the largest, with some 57 million members. the most active members based on amount and price of travel booked are designated as aadvantage Gold, aadvantage Platinum and aadvantage executive Platinum elite members, with special privileges and rewards at each tier. In 2009, aadvantage members redeemed program miles for $6.9 million in free airline tickets, ticket upgrades, discounted car rentals and hotel stays, merchandise, or other products or services offered through partners. Here we have a lot more information about who the customer is, how frequently they were able to fly and so on, mccall said. this was the start of the modern-day rewards program. However, other airlines quickly followed suit, forcing each other to start competing on the basis of their frequent flier benefits. today, there is a wide array of reward programs in virtually every industry segment. In addition to 77 airlines, almost all of the major hotel chains have loyalty cards that allow guests to earn points (redeemable for discounts, future stays or other prizes), airline miles or both. these programs are so widespread that consumers now expect that their favored hospitality and gaming companies will offer some sort of loyalty program, mccall said. this is a cultural change that probably needs to be managed better. If we look at the current state of affairs everybody has a rewards program there needs to be more strategic and measurable focus as to where were going to take this.
mccall and fellow researchers researched this question whether customer loyalty/ reward programs actually influence consumers to change their behaviors, and if so, which factors of a program have the greatest influence. the study used focus groups and surveys to measure such elements as consumers perceptions of brand equity, cumulative satisfaction, loyalty program quality and share of wallet. the research showed that customer loyalty/reward programs could have significant effects on the amount a consumer was willing to spend with a business if the consumer already had a favorable view of the brand and perceived the loyalty program to be a quality offering. the results of our informal webcast poll seemed to support this finding. audience members were asked if the reward programs to which they personally belong create brand loyalty in them. more than half the audience, 56 percent, said, yes; I belong to some very high-quality programs that offer excellent rewards. another 21 percent said, No, the program just provides discounts on items we probably would have bought anyway. Very few (only 4 percent) indicated that a rewards program could persuade them to remain loyal to a supplier they didnt like. as perceptions of the quality of loyalty programs improve, the positive effects of brand equity and satisfaction increase, mccall said. this is further justification for the need to not only have a loyalty program, but to ensure it is viewed as quality by your customer base. the perceived quality of a customer loyalty program hinges on a number of factors represented in a conceptual model developed with clay Voorhees of michigan state university. the model proposes that loyalty program success depends on design attributes in three categories: Program tiers. silver, gold, platinum membership tiers based on the amount and dollar value of the customers purchases can be powerful incentives and a good way to reward your best customers with the best rewards. current research seems to suggest that three tiers is probably a good number, mccall said, but the latest research suggests a new twist. more on that later. Rewards. rewards have to be commensurate with the tier level. you want to reward the best customers with what they perceive as good value but not give them more reward than theyre entitled to, mccall said. People like to feel that they have earned their rewards. they dont want something for nothing. Customer factors. the program design needs to fit the customer. theres a certain exclusivity that comes along with being a part of a rewards program, said mccall. these are the cool Persons clubs. People of similar status share certain commonalities and feel a connection, if the program is handled correctly.
Indicators of a well-designed program Increased purchase frequency Decreased customer price sensitivity customer advocacy extended relationship lengths Increased share of wallet Development of consumer community and connectedness stronger company performance
another cornell study delves deeper into the influence of loyalty/rewards programs over time. this research looks at eight years of transactional data 1.2 million transactions from 100,000 loyalty program members in the lodging industry. How do people behave in a loyalty program over a long period of time? Do things change as they move through tiers? Does their spending accelerate or decelerate? How do these trends align with customer demographics? mining this rich data resource, the team found that loyalty program members could be grouped into eight segments. For five of these segments 75 percent of the survey population membership in the loyalty program had no effect on either spending or loyalty. customers in two other segments appeared to increase spending based on the loyalty program, said mccall. Of greatest note was the finding that one highly valuable segment accounted for the majority of the spending, but those customers were grouped with other lesser consumers in the top tier of the program. these results suggest a need for an ultra-premium category that is reserved for a very small minority, mccall said. In casino terms, you might call them the high-rolling group. these people probably have very different needs and expectations from a loyalty program. this is a group we want to pay very close attention to, if our intention is really to give our best customers the best rewards.
thats an oversimplification of the process, Ogden conceded. when you actually start to implement the methodology to project what is going to happen in an unknown future, it leads you down the path to some fairly complicated analytical techniques, such as predictive modeling and forecasting. a hospitality or gaming company can choose to have its cLV calculations be as simple or as complex as it wishes restricted only by imagination, realism and processing capacity. there is no one single way to calculate future value, Ogden said. there are differing perspectives on the specifics of how various elements are formulated and represented, and on the mathematics you can use. at its simplest level, the cLV calculation assumes that people are creatures of habit; you can extrapolate from past trends to predict future trends. by looking at other customers with similar demographics and patterns, you can make assumptions about this customer. by using discounted cash flow (DcF) investment evaluation math over multiple periods, you can show anticipated future profits in present-day dollars. the process gets trickier when you want to consider factors other than what happened in the past and weigh the probabilities of certain future occurrences that may or may not happen. based on what you do know about the customer such as age, occupation, geographic location, income, education and credit history you can make reasonable assumptions about what you do not know such as how likely a customer is to visit your property again, and the products and services they are likely to purchase at various stages in the relationship.
whenever youre predicting the future, obviously you cant do it perfectly, Ogden said. cLV calculations are sensitive to many moving parts. If you have inaccurately calculated your historic margins, youre going to inaccurately project your future margins. If you are developing a retention model, you could have a good model or a bad model. when you put it all together with the mathematics, Ive seen formulas out there that are just plain inappropriate for how theyre being used, so you can even fall apart on the math. Dont let those risks deter you, Ogden emphasized. Just because theres some possibility of being inaccurate doesnt mean you cant reap some incremental value by going down the path. as long as you are directionally correct, youre going to add some value and make a better decision than you would have just by guessing.
Closing Thoughts
with loyalty programs emerging as a must-have in hospitality and gaming, organizations need to make sure their programs actually create brand loyalty and not just program loyalty. they need to carefully manage the various aspects of program design to create a perception of high quality. and they need to measure both the present and potential results through the lens of customer lifetime value. Our presenters provided some takeaway recommendations for companies setting out to design or revamp a customer loyalty program: Avoid creating price sensitivity among customers. If you offered me a $100 discount, Ill probably take that cash back, but now you have gotten me focused on price and not necessarily the experience of your business or your property, mccall cautioned. beware of the possibility of actually turning loyal customers into price-sensitive customers, who are then more likely to defect for a lower-priced offer. Think carefully about tier program management. rewards are easy to give, hard to take away, mccall said. Once youve earned platinum status, being demoted to silver or tinfoil is not something youre going to particularly appreciate. Think carefully about what the customer values. they might take that discount, but they might be just as happy with something else that makes them feel special or privileged, mccall said. customer engagement perception of value, connection and community is what you should be appealing to. Quantify program performance. a customer lifetime value calculation identifies your most valuable customers, so you can optimize the program to maximize not just for brand loyalty and retention, but for enduring economic value in real dollar terms. It has been nearly 30 years since american airlines rolled out its aadvantage program. we were one step away from Dec writers back then, mccall quipped. with the amount of statistical and methodological sophistication we have now, we can completely rethink how we design and manage loyalty programs. at a recent conference, I heard Jim Davis, senior Vice President and chief marketing Officer at sas, make the statement that we are no longer talking about best practices; were looking at next practices. thats really the direction and focus we need to have.
This Webcast was the third in a seven-part series, Insights and Innovations for Hospitality and Gaming, sponsored by The Center for Hospitality Research at Cornell Universitys School of Hotel Administration and SAS. Each Webcast highlights a hot topic in the hospitality and gaming industry, including data quality, labor planning, customer loyalty, sustainability and more.