Induction Handbook For Junior Lawyers - Compressed
Induction Handbook For Junior Lawyers - Compressed
Induction Handbook For Junior Lawyers - Compressed
JUNIOR LAWYERS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
USAID's Efficient and Effective Justice Activity thanks the following persons for their contribution towards
compiling this handbook:
External Consultants: Chamath Fernando, AAL (Professional Ethics and Civil Law Practice), Asela Serasinhe,
AAL (Professional Ethics and Criminal Law Practice), Gehan Gunatilleke, PhD, AAL (Legal Research
Methodology and Practice).
Efficient and Effective Justice Activity Specialists: Saranee Gunathilaka, AAL (Alternative Dispute Resolution),
Rasika Mendis, AAL (Gender Equality and Social Inclusion).
Melanie Pereira, Apsara de Silva, and Gajamugavarnan Ganesalingam of the Efficient and Effective Justice Activity,
for the review and editing of the handbook.
Disclaimer: This handbook is made possible by support of the American People through the United States
Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this handbook do not necessarily reflect the
views of USAID or the United States Government.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction 01
2. Professional Ethics 02
c. Bail Applications 39
8. Annexures 61
INTRODUCTION
The Induction Handbook is compiled by USAID's Efficient and
Effective Justice (EEJ) Activity in collaboration with the Junior Bar
Committee, for the benefit of law practitioners who have recently
embarked on their professional careers. Its contents intend to
facilitate young practitioners navigate those unfamiliar 'next steps'
that are essential to both legal practice and membership in the
legal profession.
01
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
02
A lawyer is a representative of clients engaged to assert and defend and
protect their rights, liabilities and interests, a trusted adviser and counselor,
an officer of the legal system having special responsibility for the quality of
justice, a member of a profession, and an upright citizen attempting to earn
a satisfactory living1
- A.R.B. Amarasinghe
INTRODUCTION
As members of a "profession," lawyers must take care On February 11, 1988 the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka,
to abide by a code of conduct. in the exercise of its Rule making powers under Article
136(1)(g) of the Constitution, made the Supreme
This code is based on "ethics," or values and principles Court (Conduct of and Etiquette for Attorneys-at-
that define the profession. Law) Rules 1988.They were published in the Gazette
Extraordinary of December 7, 1988. These Rules were
Hence, they are also referred to as "professional based on a draft code prepared by the Bar Association.
standards," or a set of standards regulating the The Rules have the force of written law.2 However the
activities of professionals. Rules are not exhaustive. Codes and prescribed
guidelines provide minimum standards.
1
A.R.B. Amerasinghe, Professional Ethics and Responsibilities of Lawyers (Stamford Lake 2003) 24
2
Ibid 6
03 Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers
The Difference between a Profession and a Trade or Business
LEGAL PROFESSION TRADE OR BUSINESS
Accepting Instructions Further the AAL should avoid conflict of interest, and if
In accepting instructions, the AAL should ensure that in their opinion is unable to attend to such professional
they act in accordance with the Rules 5 to 14 of the duty with due diligence, should refuse to accept such
Supreme Court Rules. professional duties.
04 Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers
After Accepting a Retainer3 Therefore, an AAL should not be compelled to divulge
such information, subject however to the limitations
Once the AAL has accepted a retainer, they are set out in Rule 38. The said duty of confidentiality
required to perform their duties in compliance with the continues even after the death of their client.
Rules 15 to 18(a) of the Supreme Court Rules.
Touting and Advertising
Hence, on accepting any professional matter it is the
duty of the AAL to exercise their skill with due In terms of Rules 39 to 49, an AAL is prohibited from
diligence to the best of their ability and in the best advertising and touting.
interest of their client.
An AAL should not under any circumstances by
4
The AAL should not gain any champertous advantage themselves or through another directly or indirectly
from their professional duties and must act with resort to the practice of touting.
complete frankness and honesty in relation to all
dealings with their client. Touting includes engaging the services of a person for a
commission to solicit clientele or advertising in any
Ceasing to Act as the Attorney-at-Law manner to unfairly attract clientele for the AAL.
The AAL is bound by the Rules 19 to 26 even after All professional name boards, material, and stationery
ceasing to act as an AAL on behalf of their client of the AAL must confirm to the specific criteria set
Therefore, the AAL should not withdraw their services out in these Rules.
without a good reason to do so.
Relationship with the Court
The AAL is required to provide adequate notice to
their client prior to the withdrawal of their professional The AAL as an Officer of Court must act according to
services. the Rules 50 to 55 in relation to the courts.
Fees and Disbursements An AAL owes a duty to court to assist it in the proper
administration of justice without interfering with the
When collecting professional fees, the AAL is expected independence of the Bar.
to act according to the Rules 27 to 30(b).
An AAL shall not or permit their client to mislead or
An AAL may in the best traditions of the profession, deceive the court, in any manner or form whatsoever.
reduce or waive a fee on account of poverty or
hardship to the client or prospective client where Relationship with Other Members of the
otherwise the client would be effectively deprived of Profession
legal advice or representation.
As a member of a profession, an AAL is expected to
An AAL should never use their client's funds held by act with courtesy, respect, and fairness towards
them in trust for their personal benefit, except with other members of the Bar in all professional matters.
client's permission.
An AAL should act in accordance with Rules 56 to 61
Confidentiality when dealing with their fellow members of the
profession.
Since the lawyer-client relationship is considered as a
fiduciary relationship,5 the AAL is required to keep in
strict confidence all information, oral or documentary,
acquired by them from or on behalf of the client.
3
Retainer – when a lawyer agrees to handle a case on behalf of a client, they are 'retained' in that particular case
4
Champertous – to bargain, to aid in, or carry on the case in consideration of a share of the outcome of the suit
5
Fiduciary relationship – a relationship based on trust between the parties
In terms of Rules 19786, the attire of Attorneys-at-Law has been prescribed as follows:
Rule 6 The attire for Attorneys-at-Law other than women Attorneys-at-Law shall be as follows:
Black coat and dark or white trousers and black tie, or white National costume, or black
sherwani with dark or white trousers.
White, black, gray, or mauve saree and jacket, or white, black, gray, or mauve frock below
the knee length or black coat and black long trousers up to the ankle with high necked
white long-sleeved shirt with collar tucked inside the trouser and black gown/cloak.
Maternity wear shall be a black high necked long frock below the knee length with white
long-sleeved shirt and black gown or the saree and jacket of the correct colors as
aforementioned with black gown/cloak.
Rule 8 Attorneys-at-Law appearing in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal shall also
wear a black gown.
It is always important to keep in mind that appearance As a professional, it is important that one reflects
matters in the practice of law. This does not mean an “professionalism” in one's attire. Especially lawyers
AAL requires expensive suits and expensive cars. who represent clients before Officers of the Labor
Department and similar other forums, it is necessary to
A bad mechanic with the best equipment and tools will dress in a manner that the Inquiring Officer identifies
still be a bad mechanic. Expensive clothes and luxury you as a lawyer.
goods will not make one an excellent lawyer.
If an AAL is uncertain of how to dress and what type of
However, there is a minimum standard of acceptable clothes you should select, it is best to consult a
appearance that is expected of an AAL. colleague, friend, or an expert in the relevant field and
obtain proper advice.
Always ask oneself "How do I look?" before engaging
in professional duties. It is important that the AAL is Ethics and Traditions in Relation to Criminal
dressed in a manner that gives the litigant a sense of Law Practice
confidence in the AAL.
As a criminal lawyer, you may be required to
A lawyer who is not dressed properly may lose their represent the legal interests of the different parties to
opportunity to present their case before a learned a criminal investigation or case, including the
Judge. suspect, accused, witnesses, victim/aggrieved party,
party with an interest in a production (such as a
If a Judge addresses an AAL with the words, vehicle or items of jewelry), which is in court custody
"Mr. Counsel, I cannot hear you," that may be an or in the custody of the police.
indication that you are not properly dressed
(unless you addressed the Court in a very low In all the above instances, the AAL is bound by all the
voice and the learned Judge could not actually hear Supreme Court Rules outlined above.
you!)
6
Gazette of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (Extraordinary) No. 1/4 dated 07.09.1978
At times the AAL may have to appear in 'unpopular' In addition to the above, the AAL must observe certain
cases or defend 'unpopular' clients who are accused of 'traditions' that are particular to criminal practice.
crimes. Remember, as per the Rules, the AAL is These are noteworthy and are outlined below.
engaging in a professional duty to safeguard the
constitutional rights of such person, no matter what In the High Court, the prosecutor (State Counsel) has a
the media or wider society states. designated table and chair facing the translator/
mudaliar and the Judge. The tradition is that only
They are expected to act in the ''best interests'' of the members of the Attorney General's Department and
client with ''due diligence'' to the best of their ability prosecutors from the Commission to Investigate
and care. Likewise, it would be unethical to criticize Allegations of Bribery or Corruption would use this
members of the legal profession who choose to facility.
represent 'unpopular' clients or appear in 'unpopular
cases,' as they are fulfilling their professional duty as an It is also a tradition that if a trial or inquiry is ongoing
AAL, on behalf of their client. before a court, at least one member of the private bar
should remain within the court, such that the last
In these instances, it is also vital to safeguard remaining AAL inside the court-house should not be
confidential information of the client and to refrain the prosecutor.
from revealing sensitive information without the
consent of the client (see Rules 31-38). The Hon. Attorney General is the chief legal officer
of the State . Par ticularly concerning criminal
Representing the Interests of aVictim or Witness investigations and prosecutions, the Attorney General
exercises a pivotal role. All officers of the Attorney
If an AAL is retained to provide legal assistance to a General's Department are representatives of the
victim of a crime or a witness, they must be aware of the Attorney General, and the due respect must be given
legal provisions and principles that are applicable to to them.
such instances.
Offering a seat to senior members of the Legal
Section 260 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act Profession and a President's Counsel, is a long-standing
Section 41 of the Judicature Act and the provisions of tradition, which needs to be safeguarded. Whenever
The Assistance to and Protection of Victims of Crime the presiding Judge or Judges are delivering an order or
and Witnesses Act No. 4 of 2015, are very important a judgment in open court, all AALs appearing for the
in this regard. case are expected to remain on their feet.
08
JURISDICTIONS AND CASE TYPES
INTRODUCTION
A civil action has to be filed before a court which has An objection to jurisdiction must be taken at the
the power to hear and determine (jurisdiction) the earliest opportunity.2 Jurisdiction could have two
legal rights of the parties. aspects, i.e., the forum before which the case needs to
be filed and the geographical location in which the case
If the case has been instituted before a court which has should be filed (local limits of jurisdiction).
no jurisdiction to hear and determine, the opposing
party is entitled to set up a plea of want of As far as the original civil ligation is concerned, the
jurisdiction. forum would be a District Court or the Commercial
High Court. Appellate jurisdiction in respect of civil
In terms of Section 76 of the Civil Procedure Code, if matters will be exercised by the Civil Appellate High
the defendant intends to dispute the averment1 in the Court or the Supreme Court.
plaint as to the jurisdiction of the court, they must do so
by a separate and distinct plea, expressly traversing Therefore, a fair understanding of the hierarchy of civil
such averments. courts in Sri Lanka is important.
Supreme Court
Court of Appeal
Provincial High Court Civil Appellate High Court Commercial High Court
District Court
1
An 'Averment' is a formal statement made by a party in their pleadings which may contain facts or circumstance sought to be proved or substantiated.
2
Jalaldeen vs. Rajaratnam [1986] 2 Sri LR 201
However, the said jurisdiction of a Family Court is also An appeal lies directly to the Supreme Court from the
presently exercised by the District Court. Commercial High Court. At present, only the High
Court of the Western Province has been empowered
Provisions contained in the Evidence Ordinance are to exercise civil jurisdiction and there are four divisions
applicable in respect of recording evidence before a of the Commercial High Court sitting in Colombo.
District/Family Court.
Civil Appellate High Court
In terms of Section 5A of High Court of the Provinces
(Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act No. 54 of 2006, A party who is aggrieved by a judgment or an order
the High Court established by Article 154P of the delivered by a District Court could invoke an appellate
Constitution for a province shall have the appellate and or revisionary jurisdiction of Civil Appellate High
revisionary jurisdiction in respect of judgments, Court established under the provisions of Article 154P
decrees, and orders delivered by any District Court of the Constitution read together with High Court of
or Family Court within such province. the Provinces (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act
No. 54 of 2006.
Commercial High Court
Supreme Court
High Court of the Provinces (Special Provisions) Act
No. 10 of 1996 vested first instance civil jurisdiction in Once the judgment is delivered by the Civil Appellate
respect of matters listed in the First Schedule of the High Court, a party who is not satisfied with the
said Act on the High Courts established under Article judgment has the option of appealing to the Supreme
154P of the Constitution. Court.
Subject to the pecuniary or other limitations prescribed by any law, action shall be instituted in the
court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction
3
Gazette (Extraordinary), High Court of the Provinces (Special Provisions) Act No. 10 of 1996 (No. 2112/33, 2019)
In addition, it is necessary to consider whether an Fundamental rights and writ applications do not fall
arbitration clause is included in the contract document strictly within civil procedure (or criminal procedure
in terms of Section 5 of the Arbitration Act No. 11 of for that matter) but is a vitally important aspect of Sri
1995. Lanka's adversarial litigation.
If a party to an arbitration agreement institutes legal It gives an aggrieved litigant the space to vindicate or
proceedings in a court against another party to such redress a Constitutionally recognized 'fundamental
agreement in respect of a matter agreed to be right' that is purportedly violated.
submitted for arbitration under such agreement, the
court shall have no jurisdiction to hear and determine In terms of Article 17 read together with Article 126
such matter if the other party objects to the court of the Constitution of the Republic, the sole and
exercising jurisdiction in respect of such matter. exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine any
question relating to the infringement or imminent
TYPES OF CASES infringement by executive or administrative action of
any fundamental right or language right declared and
Every District Court follows a filing and numbering recognized by Chapter III or Chapter IV is vested with
system in line with the standard practices of case the Supreme Court of the Republic.
management.There are certain common abbreviations
used by courts to identify different types of cases. It is Fundamental rights recognized under the Constitution
always advisable to be familiar with the case of the Republic are set out in Articles 10 to 14.
identification codes in advance if you are appearing in a Restrictions on fundamental rights are allowed in
court in which you have not appeared before. Some of limited circumstances, which are set out in Articles 15
the common codes are as follows: and 16. These circumstances include the preservation
of public security.
MR/DMR Money Recovery
Restrictions, however, must be in proportion to the
DR/DDR Debt Recovery needs of public security and Constitutionally
entrenched limitations on fundamental rights. 4
L/DLM Land
Petition and Affidavit It is important that you obtain written instructions and
all the related documents (i.e. any available medical
reports, gazettes, circulars, photographs, voice/video
Support for leave to proceed recordings, complaint to the Human Rights
Commission) from the Client at the initial consultation
and identify all necessary parties in order to name them
as party Respondents.
WRIT APPLICATIONS
If leave to proceed If leave to proceed
granted refused In terms of Article 140 of the Constitution, the Court
of Appeal shall have full power and authority to inspect
and examine the records of any Court of first instance
Notices to the Matter ends or tribunal or other institution and grant, issue
Respondents according to law orders "in the nature of writs” - of
certiorari, prohibition, procedendo, mandamus, and
quo warranto.
Statement of
objections/counter Certiorari and Prohibition
affidavit
within 14 days from Certiorari and prohibition are two separate and
such notice distinct prerogative writs. But the rules applicable to
them are broadly similar so that they can conveniently
be described together.
Counter affidavit by
the Petitioner within As remedies, the difference between them is that
14 days replying to whereas certiorari is available to get rid of a past
the allegations of exercise of power, prohibition always acts as a remedy
fact contained in any for the future by preventing an officer or authority from
Respondent's proceeding to exercise a power which it does not have
affidavit in a given situation.
Although statute law has provided for orders in the It is to be observed that quo warranto is a remedy
nature of writs of procedendo, there are in our law no available to call upon a person to show by what
reported cases in which procedendo was in fact sought. authority they claim to hold such office. Therefore the
The theory is that the writ is available to compel an basic purpose of the writ is to determine whether the
officer or authority to exercise power in the exercise holder of a public office is legally entitled to that office.
of which they or it has a duty to act judicially. Thus, a If a person is disqualified by law to hold statutory office
court of law wrongly declining to act on the incorrect the writ is available to oust them.10
basis that it has no jurisdiction in respect of a given
action, can be compelled by procedendo to proceed to In terms of Article 141 of the Constitution, the Court
try such action and deliver judgment. of Appeal is empowered to issue orders in the nature of
writ of habeas corpus in order to examine the legality
Thus, procedendo would lie in much the same of any person who has been detained in public or
circumstances as mandamus except that the former is private custody.
available to compel the exercise of power acting
judicially only. However, as procedendo has not been in The Court of Appeal has the power to direct the
use in this country, no special mention will hereafter be Magistrate Court of the area of the alleged detention,
made of procedendo.8 to 'inquire into and report' on the alleged illegal
detention, whereupon the Court of Appeal will decide
Mandamus on whether a writ of habeus corpus can be granted or
issued.
Instances where, although we have called upon some
officer or authority to exercise power vested in them In terms of Article 154 P (4) of the Constitution
or it by law, there has been an express or implied refusal introduced by the 13th Amendment to the
to exercise such power, and such failure to exercise Constitution, Provincial High Courts have limited
powers to exercise writ jurisdiction. A writ
power prejudices us. In such cases the remedy is to
application is to be filed by way of petition and
seek an order in the nature of a writ of mandamus to
affidavit; notice, motion, and proxy will have to be
compel such officer or authority to validly exercise that
filed accordingly. 11
power.9
Petition and Affidavit
Support for notice on the Respondents
Written submissions
Hearing
8
Judgment
Ibid 834
9
Ibid 835
10
Dilan Perera vs. Rajitha Senaratne [2000] 2 Sri LR 79
11
The Court of Appeal (Appellate Procedure) Rules 1990
Always stand when addressing the Bench and “Your Honor, may I respectfully suggest the
make every endeavor to address the Court 10th of January 2023, if it suits Your Honor's
from the Bar table. You should always avoid Court and my learned friend?"
any sign of disrespect towards the Court
such as having your hands in your pocket or
pointing the finger at the learned Judge. If the opposing party moves for an adjournment or
further time to comply with an order of the Court and,
if you want the next date to be a final date for the next
The Bench is addressed as “Your Honor” in the District step:
Court and Commercial High Court.
“Your Honor, may it be a final date"
A Supreme Court Judge is addressed as "Your Lordship/
My Lord or Your Ladyship/ My Lady."
Once the matter is re-fixed, make sure that you note
It is a part and parcel of good advocacy and down the next date in your diary clearly and accurately.
legal professionalism to act with extreme
respect and courtesy towards the Court and It is always advisable to inform the client about the day's
the other members of the legal profession. proceedings and the next date after the conclusion of
the case.
“Your Honor, Mr. Saman Ellawala, Advise the Instructing Attorney-at-Law to obtain a
President's Counsel appears for the Plaintiff. certified copy of the proceedings (if available) before
Mr. Ellawala, President's Counsel is the next date.
indisposed. Therefore, I respectfully move
that the matter may be re-fixed for trial Oral and Written Applications Before the Court
(support/argument etc.)"
Oral Applications:
If the Senior Counsel is having a personal difficulty: Due to the large volume of work before courts, the
learned Judges are under intense pressure to hear each
“Your Honor, Mr. Saman Ellawala, and every case within a limited judicial time period.
President's Counsel appears for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Ellawala, President's Counsel is having a It is essential that lawyers understand that in such
personal difficulty to be present before Your situations brevity and precision are highly appreciated
Honor's Court today.Therefore, I respectfully attributes in any practitioner.
move that the matter may be re-fixed for
trial (support/argument etc.)" Therefore, as a junior lawyer it is very useful if you plan
out your application in advance and be ready to address
court without causing unnecessary delay. It is advisable
If you wish to keep the case down: to have your appearance and points written down on a
paper for easy reference.
"Your Honor, Mr. Saman Ellawala,
President's Counsel appears for the Plaintiff. As a Counsel appearing on behalf of a litigant, it is your
May this matter be taken up a little later” duty to assist the court in coming to the appropriate
conclusions.
13
Glanville Williams Learning the Law (10th edn, Stevens & Sons Limited 1978)
Institution of Action:
If Defendant absent
If Defendant present
and unrepresented
Plaintiff to
take steps
Written Submissions
Judgment
PLAINT PETITION
2
The plaint or in appropriate actions the petition commences the legal process. A
plaint can be amended (S. 93 of CPC) or withdrawn (S.406 of CPC). There can be
instances where the law requires the Plaintiff to submit an Affidavit to support the
contents of the plaint/petition. Therefore, it is important to consider the relevant
legal provisions prior to the institution of the action.
SUMMONS
3
Once the case is filed before the Court, summons will be issued to the Defendant.
Sections 55 to 71 of the CPC are applicable. There can be instances where law
requires summons to be in a special form (Form 19 in the 1st schedule to the CPC
under summary procedure on liquid claims).
ANSWER
4
On the summons returnable date, the Defendant is required to file the proxy and
the answer. Sections 72 to 78 of the CPC are applicable in this regard.
REPLICATION
5
If the answer of the Defendant contains a claim in reconvention, in terms of S. 79 of
CPC the Plaintiff is entitled to file a replication.
PRE-TRIAL
6
Once all the pleadings are completed, the matter will be fixed for pre-trial. Ss. 79A,
142A to 142I of CPC are applicable. The written issues and admissions of the
respective parties should be filed 14 days prior to the pre-trial date with notice to
opposing party. It is advisable to file the list of witness and documents also along
with the written issues and admissions despite that the list needs to be filed 15 days
prior to the trial date.
20 Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers
TRIAL
7
Once the pre-trial is over, the matter will be fixed for trial. If a party intends to
invoke steps specified in Chapter XVI of the CPC (interrogations,
discovery/inspection/production/impounding documents) necessary applications
must be made prior to the date of the trial. Due to the default of a party, as the case
may be, the matter may get fixed for ex-parte trial or may get dismissed. The
relevant provisions are found under Ss. 84 to 88 of the CPC.
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
8
At the conclusion of the trial as a practice of court, the learned Judge may direct the
parties to tender their respective written submissions.
APPEAL
11
If any party to a litigation is aggrieved by any order or judgment delivered by a court,
such party is entitled to prefer an appeal. The relevant procedure is found
in Chapter VIII of the CPC.
It is necessary to understand that drafting of legal documents and pleadings, including letter of
demand/notice to quit, etc. are interconnected components in the litigation process.
Once you send the letter of demand or file your pleadings, your client's case will be defined and restricted
by the contents of the letter of demand or the pleadings you have filed. Hence, the entire civil litigation
process will depend on the initial documents you draft and tender.
Therefore, it is necessary to consider the entire process prior to the drafting of such written documents.
Cause of Action
In terms of Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Code, every application to a court for relief or remedy obtainable
through the exercise of the court's power or authority or otherwise to invite its interference constitutes an
"action." In civil litigation, every action is based on a "cause of action." Therefore, identification of the
correct cause of action is fundamental to any legal drafting.
14
15
Civil Procedure Code [1890] as amended, s.5 Relief
Pless Pol v Lady de Soysa et al 1907], 9 NLR 316
When drafting pleadings, it is Unless the Plaintiff has sought interim relief, it is not
necessary to consider the necessary to plead evidence in the Plaint filed before
possible admissions and issues the District Court or Commercial High Court,
Admissions in the eventual trial. Therefore, except the base document/s. However, in terms of
and Issues pleadings need to be drafted in Section 101 of the Evidence Ordinance, generally
a manner that admissions and the burden of proof lies on the party who asserts the
issues could be framed existence of facts. Further, it is necessary to consider
referring to specific averments whether your client is required to tender an affidavit
in pleadings. along with the plaint/petition, etc.
Plaint
A
Sections 39 to 54 of the Civil Procedure Code Civil Procedure Code, as amended
Answer
B Applicability of the Evidence Ordinance in
Sections 72 to 78 of the Civil Procedure Code Civil Actions by Dr. Abdul Majeed
Replication
C A Commentary on Civil Procedure
Section 79 of the Civil Procedure Code
Code and Civil Law in Sri Lanka by
Dr. Abdul Majeed
Affidavit
D Sections 437 and 151A of the Civil Procedure Civil Procedure in Sri Lanka by
Code Kalinga Indatissa, President's Counsel
26
INTRODUCTION
An Attorney-at-Law engaging in criminal practice, fulfils At a consultation, you must strive to ascertain all the
a vital role in the administration of justice in any facts of the matter and assess as to what criminal
country. offences have been committed by the alleged
perpetrator. Thereafter, the next step would be to
In appearing for a suspect or an accused, an Attorney is proceed to lodge a formal complaint to the relevant
duty bound to ensure certain fundamentals. For authority. Depending on the nature of the
instance, it is essential to ensure that the Constitutional alleged offence, such authority could be:
rights of such person are safeguarded. Article 11 of the
Constitution prohibits torture or cruel, inhumane, or The relevant Police Station
degrading treatment or punishment. Article 13 of the
Constitution provides safeguards against arbitrary Criminal Investigations Department
arrests, detentions, and guarantees a 'fair trial'.1 A
criminal lawyer must always bear in mind the Colombo Fraud Investigations Bureau
'presumption of innocence' which is enshrined in
Article 13(5) of the Constitution. Commission to Investigate Allegations
of Bribery or Corruption
A lawyer practicing criminal law also has the
opportunity of providing legal assistance to victims of National Child Protection Authority 3
crime and witnesses. Importantly, the AAL has a role to
play in every stage of the criminal justice system The procedure at the Criminal Investigations
commencing from the investigation stage, trial stage, Department is that a written complaint of the
and finally the appellate and/or revisionary stage of a complainant must first be submitted to the relevant
criminal case. 2 counter at the Criminal Investigations Department
with supporting evidence/documents, and thereafter
COURT PROCESSES AND the Criminal Investigations Department will inform the
complainant to attend the Criminal Investigations
PRACTICES
Department for statements to be recorded.
Lodging a Police Complaint
Most investigative authorities, require the complainant
You may be consulted by an individual who has been
to attend the investigative authority so that statements
subject to a criminal offence.
can be directly recorded.
1
AG v. Segulebbe Latheef and another (2008) 1 SLLR 225
2
Provisions of The Assistance to and Protection of Victims of Crime and Witnesses Act No: 4 of 2015
3
This list is not exhaustive.
27 Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers
Preparing to Lodge a Police Complaint · Complain to the National Police Commission
· Make a formal representation to the Hon.
It is necessary that you prepare your client to explain to Attorney General and/or lodge a complaint at the
the investigator, the following matters clearly: Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka
· If all of the above steps do not result in any relief,
you may have to consider filing a fundamental rights
application based on a violation of Article 12 of the
Background to the incident Constitution
Private Plaints
When did the alleged incidents take Whether the victim has lodged a police complaint, or
place? not, if the police do not initiate criminal proceedings,
you are entitled to file a 'private plaint' in the relevant
Magistrate Court against the offender. 4
Where did those incidents take place? Such an application is filed with a plaint and an affidavit,
and you need to satisfy the Magistrate that there is
sufficient material for the Magistrate to issue process.
Generally, a draft charge is also filed as part and parcel
What other witnesses and evidence of the application. The plaint should be signed by the
are available to confirm the version of complainant and counter signed by the Attorney-at-
the client? Law appearing for them.
Sometimes the police may refuse to record your It is important to be familiar with the provisions of The
client's complaint by stating that “no criminal Assistance to and Protection of Victims of Crime and
offence has been revealed.” Or else, after having Witnesses Act No. 4 of 2015, which has greatly
recorded the complaint, they may not commence and enhanced the role of Attorneys-at-Law appearing for
proceed with an investigation. You may need to the aggrieved party and witnesses. Frequently, you may
consider taking the following steps: be called upon to address the concerns of the victim or
witness in the following matters:
· Complain to the relevant Superintendent of Police,
requesting that appropriate action be taken Any special difficulty in attending court
· Complain to the office of the Inspector General of
Police
Any illness of the victim/witness
4
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 136 (1) (a)
5
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 260
Judicature Act No. 27 of 1999, s 41
Bandaranaike v Jagathsena and others [1984] 2 SLR 397
JURISDICTION AND CASE TYPES When you appear in court representing a suspect who
has just been arrested, and is now being produced
The investigation stage before the Magistrate for the first time, depending on
the instructions of your client, remember to inform the
A criminal investigation would generally commence Magistrate of the following matters:
following a first information/complaint.8
If the suspect has a definite defense, such as an 'alibi', you may place
it on record
If the suspect alleges that they were subjected to torture, you may
request that the Magistrate produce them for a medical examination to
a Judicial Medical Officer so that a report can be tendered to court
Whether the suspect has any injuries and/or illnesses that need
medical attention
Whether the suspect was kept detained for a longer period of time
than what is permitted by law
6
The Assistance to and Protection of Victims of Crime and Witnesses Act No. 4 of 2015, s 31
7
The Assistance to and Protection of Victims of Crime and Witnesses Act No. 4 of 2015, s 3
8
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 109
9
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 124
Revision applications to the High Court Generally, in the Magistrate Court, a motion can be
filed on the same morning.23 It is useful to inquire and
If your client is aggrieved by any 'order' imposed by a find out as to which day it would be possible to have
Magistrate, there is a possibility of filing a revision the case called by way of a motion, because
20
application against such order, in the High Court. Magistrate Courts generally have court dates set
Revisionary jurisdiction is 'discretionary'. Therefore, apart of various police stations.
you will need to demonstrate 'exceptional
circumstances' in order to succeed. Sometimes, where the opposing party also needs to be
heard, you may have to file the motion after giving
The revision application to the High Court will consist adequate notice to the opposing party. In such
of a proxy, motion, petition, and affidavit. A complete instances, you may be required to submit proof along
certified copy of the Magistrate Court case record with the motion to satisfy court that the opposing party
which contains the impugned order, needs to be has been served with such notice.
annexed to the application. 21
• Annexure (K) contains a draft motion
Against an order of acquittal, an appeal to the High
Court can be preferred only with the sanction of the Proceedings in the High Court
Attorney General.22 If the sanction of the Attorney
General is not obtained; the alternative would be to Service of Indictment and Bail
file a revision application in the High Court.
Before you appear on the first day where the
There is no bar to filing a revision application in the indictment is to be served on the accused, it is best to
High Court against a final order/judgment of the obtain information as to the usual bail conditions that
Magistrate Court, if one can explain the failure to the relevant High Court Judge would order in similar
appeal, provided that there is no inordinate delay and cases.
'exceptional circumstances' can be established.
Different High Court Judges have different policies
In a revision application, it would be required to aver concerning the bail conditions that would be ordered.
whether the revisionary jurisdiction of the High Generally, it is advisable to be prepared for the
Court has been previously invoked or not. following bail conditions:
18
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 320
19
Section 19 of the Bail Act
20
The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka of 1978, Article 154 P (3) (b) of the 13th
Amendment; The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka of 1978, Article 138.
21
The Court of Appeal (Appellate Procedure) Rules 1990, Part II
22
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 318
23
Different courts may have different policies.
• Several sureties who should be prepared with the The purpose of the pre-trial conference is to ensure
Grama Sevaka certificates and their legible national that all parties are prepared to face the trial once it
identity cards to confirm their place of residence commences. Therefore, it is advisable that you obtain
and identity from court custody or from the prosecution, all
information and documents which would be
• Some High Courts may require blood relatives as needed for you to face a 'fair trial.'
sureties in which case documents in proof of the
relationship will have to be ready It is necessary that you are well versed with the
provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure
• Sometimes, Court may order a foreign travel ban, (Amendment) Act No. of 2022 with regard to your
and may order that the passport of the accused be duties during the 'pre-trial conference.'
handed over to court custody. If there is no
passport, Court may require for an affidavit to be Preparing for a High CourtTrial
submitted to that effect.
Have consultations with the accused and explain the
When the indictment is served on the accused, you may nature of the charge/charges. Note down the version
obtain it to your custody so that you can ascertain of the accused. Discuss the statements of the
whether the indictment contains all the necessary prosecution witnesses and the other documents
information. relied upon by the prosecution (such as
medico-legal reports, government analyst reports,
If there is any information or documents lacking, you audit reports, etc.) and ascertain the position of
will have to raise this at the pre-trial stage.24 the accused concerning these items of evidence.
24
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act No. 2 of 2022.
It is important to obtain information about the If you are dissatisfied with the sentence of the High
antecedents of the prosecution witnesses so that they Court (if it is too harsh or if it is contrary to law) you
can be properly cross-examined. may challenge it before the Court of Appeal by way of
an appeal or revision.
If the defense hopes to tender computer evidence, it is
required to comply with the procedures set out in Pleading guilty to an amended indictment which
Evidence (Special Provisions) Act No.14 of 1995. contains less serious charges
Pleading guilty to the indictment as it is, and The Attorney General may then move to amend the
mitigating for a lenient sentence indictment, and you may proceed to plead guilty to
amended charges. 27
Carefully consider the penal provisions of the charges
in the indictment and discuss the possible penalties Pleading guilty to a 'lesser offence,' if the
which the Court may impose, with the accused before prosecutor (Attorney General's Department) is
taking this decision. If the accused has previous willing to accept a plea for a lesser offence
convictions, we may expect the Judge to give a custodial
sentence. 25 Make representations to the prosecutor (State
Counsel) setting out the special exceptions applicable
However, if the punishment prescribed permits a to your client and other mitigatory factors. The
suspended sentence in terms of section 303 of the Attorney General's Department may take some time
Code of Criminal Procedure Act and the accused to consider whether they are willing to accept a 'plea'.
has no previous convictions, there may be a
possibility of a lenient sentence.26 If your client is willing to voluntarily pay compensation
to the aggrieved party, you may indicate that to the
Before your client decides to plead guilty to the charges prosecuting State Counsel. If the Attorney General is
in the indictment as they stand, you must explain the willing to accept a plea, with the permission of the court
possible penalties. you can proceed to plead guilty to the lesser offence.28
25
Always check the fingerprint report of the accused to check whether he/she has any previous convictions, before taking the decision to plead guilty.
26
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act No. 49 of 1999, s 303 and the determination of the Supreme Court in SC Ref: 3/2008.
27
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 167
.28
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 194
33 Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers
It is important that you explain to your client that Section 200(1) Applications
although you submit mitigatory grounds on their behalf
for a lenient sentence, it is ultimately the decision of the When the prosecution has concluded its case, if the
High Court Judge as to what sentence may be imposed. evidence is incapable of leading to a conviction, you may
If the sentence imposed is too harsh or illegal, the make an application that the accused be acquitted
remedy would be to file an appeal or a revision to the without calling for a defense.31 It is advisable only to
Court of Appeal against such sentence. make an application on this basis, where you find that
the evidence is clearly inadequate.
Cross-Examination of Prosecution Witnesses
THE DEFENSE CASE
As stated previously, it is expected that you would have
obtained all documents necessary for the preparation As discussed previously, you ought to have arrived at an
of the case, by the time the prosecution starts leading understanding with the accused as to what kind of
the evidence of its first witness. 29 Therefore, you should defense you would take in the case, even before the
foresee what each prosecution witness will state in prosecution case has commenced. Of course,
their evidence in court. depending on the evidence which materializes during
the case, you may have to re-assess your defense
The strategy that you adopt to cross-examine (or to position.
refrain from cross-examining) a prosecution
witness will depend on your overall defense in the However, it is advisable that your client understands
case. As a rule, it is best not to cross-examine when the defense position that is being taken on their behalf.
the evidence of a witness does not have an adverse This is because, they may have to give evidence
bearing on your case. Remember to suggest the (from the witness box or make a docks statement) at
defense position, to appropriate prosecution the end of the trial. It is also your client who can
witnesses during your cross examination. inform you of any available defense witnesses on their
behalf.
Examples:
The Accused Remaining Silent
In a case where the evidence of a certain
witness does not have an adverse impact The accused has a right to remain
on your defense position, you may refrain s i l e n t . 32 H oweve r, o n e mu s t
from cross-examining such witness. remember the application of the
'Ellenborough dictum'. Thus, if the
prosecution has built up prima facie case against your
client, it is advisable that the accused at least makes a
In a murder case, where your defense is 'dock statement' in their defense. 33
that of a 'sudden fight', it is imperative that
you suggest this position to the relevant
eyewitness (if any) and to the investigating The Accused Giving Evidence
officers who may have come across from the Witness Box
information or evidence to suggest that the
incident took place during a 'sudden fight'. This is a decision that should be
taken after much consideration.The
accused tends to become nervous
It is important to remember that you are not permitted and excited during cross-
to make imputations to a witness without reasonable examination by the prosecution, even though they may
grounds and that you must not pose questions to a claim to be innocent. The Court room atmosphere
witness which are indecent, scandalous and intends to may be intimidating, and even a well-prepared accused
insult or annoy a witness. 30 may falter.
29
During the pre-trial conference stage
30
Sections 149 to 152 of the Evidence Ordinance
31
AG v Baranage [2003] 1 SLLR 340
32
The Queen v Santin Singho [1962] 65 NLR 445
33
AG v Potta Naufer and others (Sarath Ambepitiya Case) [2007] (2) SLLR 144
However, if not, they will most certainly be cross- However, it is advisable to explain to the client, that the
examined by the prosecution severely on their court has ultimate discretion on determining the
different stances. punishment, notwithstanding what submission are
made on behalf of the accused or against the accused.
34
Familiarize yourself with the Supreme Court determination in SC Ref: 3/2008 and subsequent judgments concerning minimum mandatory sentences and judicial
discretion to impose suspended sentences even when the law provides for mandatory prison sentences.
35
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act No. 47 of 1999
35 Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers
• Taking up a preliminary objection against a charge/indictment36
• Objecting to leading questions or to the leading of inadmissible/prejudicial evidence by the opposing party
• Making an application in terms of section 200(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, when the
prosecution case is concluded
• Final submissions, after the conclusion of the prosecution case and the defense case
As a general rule, it is best to present oral or written • Annexure (L) contains a draft Motion
submissions in a brief manner. As Judges are often over-
worked and pressed for time, it is best to focus on your Proceedings in the Court of Appeal
main arguments.
Appeals from the High Court to the Court of
Cite the law with the relevant provisions and judicial Appeal
authorities and explain how it applies favorably to your
argument. Whatever grievance of a client you raise, Against a conviction and sentence imposed in the High
remember to back it up with the law. It is advisable that Court, there is a right of appeal to the Court of Appeal
38
you submit to the Judge, copies of judgments that you within 14 days. You are required to file a 'petition of
may rely on, in support of your arguments. appeal' which is addressed to the Court of Appeal, but
which is to be filed in the High Court Registry. It is
Always remember that although you represent one important to list your main grounds of appeal concisely
party to the case, the Judge will have to assess the case in the said petition of appeal.
from different angles.
• Annexure ( M ) contains a draft Petition of Appeal
Therefore, it is best for you to be fair in your submission
and arguments. If not, when the opposing party When the petition of appeal is filed in the High Court
addresses the Court and exposes your misrepre- Registry, it will take some time for the matter to be
-sentations, the Judge will not be inclined to rely on listed before the Court of Appeal. When it is listed, a
your arguments. notice will be sent to the address of the Appellant by
the Court of Appeal Registry, thereafter on the
Motions in the High Court payment of the 'brief fees' the appeal brief may be
obtained.
Motions are generally filed to get the case called in
open court on an earlier date, to make some special In the Court of Appeal, the procedure of determining
application on behalf of your client. Generally, in High criminal appeals is in terms of provisions of the Code of
Courts the motion must be filed in the Registry at least Criminal Procedure Act and the Court of Appeal
two to three days prior to the date on which the case is Rules.39
to be called in open court. 37
The appellant would file written submissions first, next
It is imperative that notice is given to the opposing the Attorney General, and finally the arguments will be
party (generally the State Counsel prosecuting in the conducted. On a prescribed date, the Court of Appeal
relevant High Court), in order for the Judge to allow would deliver the final order.
the motion to be called.
36
Judicature Act No. 27 of 1999, s 39
37
It is to be noted that different courts may have different policies
38
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 331. See also International Covenant on Civil and Political. Rights Act, No. 56 of 2007, s 4(2).
39
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 331 - 342; The Court of Appeal (Appellate Procedure) Rules 1990.
If the Court of Appeal is satisfied that there are It is also possible to file a Supreme Court Special Leave
sufficient grounds to issue 'notice' to the respondents, to Appeal Application where the accused was
the Court will proceed to issue 'notice' on the convicted by the Magistrate and the Appeal to the High
respondents and fix the case to be mentioned for Court has been held against the accused.
'notice returnable' on which date the respondents are
required to appear. In this situation, the High Court 'appeal brief' will have
to be filed in the Supreme Court along with petition,
It is important that you properly file the notices in the affidavit, and proxy.47
Court of Appeal Registry, so that the notices could be
served on the respondents without delay. • Annexure (O) contains a draft Petition pertaining to such
an application
40
The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka of 1978, Article 138. See also SC Appeal No: 111,113,114/2015 decided on 27-05-2020.
41
The Court of Appeal (Appellate Procedure) Rules 1990
42
The Court of Appeal (Appellate Procedure) Rules 1990, Rule 3(1) (b)
43
The Court of Appeal ( Appellate Procedure) Rules 1990
44
The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka of 1978, Article 128.
45
Ibid.
46
Within six weeks of the Court of Appeal Order.
47
Ibid.
CRIMINAL LITIGATION
Special Leave
Direct Appeal
to Appeal
Supreme
Court
From the From the Permanent
Court of Appeal High Court Trial - at - Bar
Trial - at - Bar
AG CIABOC
48
Supreme Court Rules 1990.
Basic Principles The Bail Act does not apply to offences under the Public
Security Ordinance or Prevention of Terrorism Act.49
You may be instructed by your client to obtain 'bail' on Also, if the person was arrested concerning a criminal
behalf of a suspect or accused who is incarcerated. At a offence under a special statute which contains an
consultation, you need to try and ascertain the 'express provision' which applies to bail, it is that special
following information from the client and their family bail provision that would apply and not the Bail Act. 50
members and/or close associates:
Example: The Penal Code does not contain any express
provisions pertaining to Bail. Therefore, it is the Bail Act
When were they arrested/incarcerated? which would apply.
Who arrested them? Which police station or Section 83(1) of the Poisons, Opium, and Dangerous Drugs
Ordinance contains a special bail provision. Therefore, the
authority was involved in the arrest?
Bail Act does not apply to situations under section 83(1) of
the Poisons, Opium, and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance.
To which court have they been produced, or if
they had not yet been produced to Court yet,
Obtaining Bail under the Bail Act
which Court are they due to be produced
before? Whether the offence is 'bailable' or 'non-bailable,' the
criteria for determining whether it is suitable to grant
In which Court did they appear for their case? bail is set out in section 14. Those considerations are as
follows:
Any details about the alleged offence
committed by the person under arrest?
52
Bail Act No. 30 of 1997, s 13 will be taken up and Court will make an order
Bail Act No. 30 of 1997, s 17; Wickremasinghe v AG and another [2010] 1 SLR 141
53
Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, s 115 - 120 concerning the bail application.
54
Bail Act No. 30 of 1997, s 21
55
Bail Act No. 30 of 1997, s 19
40 Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers
Example: The general practice is that you may make an oral
When the allegation is the commission of the offence of submission pleading for bail. You can also file written
'murder' under section 296 of the Penal Code which is submissions with supporting documents and case law,
punishable by 'death'. in support of your application. The prosecution and
aggrieved party also may make submissions concerning
• Annexure (Q) contains a draft Petition of a High Court bail and the Magistrate will make an order on the same
bail application under the Bail Act day on another date.
If your client has already been indicted and is in remand, If bail is refused in the Magistrate Court, you have the
while the case is proceeding in the High Court, you may opportunity to plead for bail, if and when there are new
make an oral bail application on the date in which the grounds for the Court to consider. When the
case is taken up in Court, or if there is an urgency, you Magistrate Court has refused your bail application,
may have the case called by way of a motion to make a you may file a Revision Application against the said
bail application in open Court. refusal of bail. The first step is to apply and obtain a
complete certified copy of the entire case record of
the Magistrate Court case. The revision application
Bail Pending Appeal Following can be filed before the relevant Provincial High
a Conviction in the High Court Court. The drafts applicable to revisions to the High
Court against orders of the Magistrate Court
If the accused is convicted in the High would apply with appropriate amendments.59
Court, and an appeal has been filed to
the Court of Appeal on their behalf, you Bail Applications to be Filed Directly in the High
may make a bail pending appeal Court
application to the High Court itself.56 A
person who has been sentenced to Under certain statutes, where the Bail Act does not
death cannot obtain bail pending appeal. apply, you may have to directly file a bail application to
the High Court in terms of the relevant Law.
The drafts applicable to direct bail
applications to the High Court can be Example: Section 83(1) of the Poisons, Opium, and
used with appropriate amendments, in Dangerous Drugs Ordinance as amended by Act No: 41 of
this regard.57 You will have to convince 2022.
the High Cour t that there are
'exceptional circumstances' to release • Annexure (R) contains a draft Petition of a bail
the accused on bail pending appeal. 58 application under section 83(1) of the Poisons, Opium, and
Dangerous Drugs Ordinance as amended by Act No: 41 of
2022.
Example: Offenses against the Public Property Act Section In such instances, you will be required to file a direct
8(1) contains such a provision. In terms of this section, bail application before the Court of Appeal.
Bail can be sought in the Magistrate Court.
• Annexure (S) contains a draft Petition of a direct Court of
Appeal bail application
56
Bail Act No. 30 of 1997, s 20
57
See Annexure (J) and (K)
58
Ramu Thamotharampillai v. AG [2004] 2 SLR 180; AG v. Ediriweera [2006] (BLR) 12
59
See Annexure (C)
42
INTRODUCTION
Legal practitioners engage in legal research in the A practitioner needs to act with due diligence,
context of advancing justice for their clients. Such legal swiftness, and courtesy while maintaining their client's
research differs from the type of research undertaken confidence and avoiding conflict of interests.Therefore,
by a legal academic or student who wishes to write a practitioner who neglects to conduct thorough legal
an essay, article, or thesis. research may run the risk of failing in their duty to the
client and to the Court. Poor research may deprive the
1. The Purpose of Legal Research relevant actors from gaining a better understanding of
the law. Practitioners should thus commit themselves
The aim of legal research as far as a practitioner is to continuously developing their research skills and
concerned boils down to ascertaining the law so it can knowledge of the law.
be applied to a particular legal problem. Therefore, a
practitioner approaches legal research in a practical Types of Research
and methodical manner with a view to deriving an
answer to a particular legal question. In doing so, a Legal research (including academic legal research)
practitioner will also benefit practically. For example, tends to focus on legal doctrine (and occasionally on
correctly identifying relevant legal issues can help legal theory) and does not usually include empirical
ensure proper case management. research of an observational or consultative nature, i.e.,
primary research involving quantitative research or
On occasion, the practitioner will discover that the law qualitative research.1
on a particular legal question does not provide a
clear answer, either because the interpretation of Distinctions between legal research of an academic
the relevant statute or judgment is contested, or nature and non-academic legal research that a
because there is no clear legal answer to the practitioner would undertake ought to be noted.
question. Therefore, legal research can also
contribute towards the development of the law. First, the central purpose of academic legal research is
to contribute towards the development of legal
The Importance of Legal Research knowledge. By contrast, the main purpose of non-
academic legal research undertaken by a legal
The skill to conduct legal research is vital for practitioner is to present an argument on behalf of
practitioners regardless of their area of practice. their client, or to explain a legal position to their client.
Every case, appeal, opinion, and advisory engagement The end of such legal research is argumentative,
would require varying degrees of legal research. For analytical, and explanatory, and does not need to be a
instance, a practitioner's understanding and analysis of 'new' contribution to legal knowledge. Second, the
a case begins with the identification of the facts and methods and methodology of academic legal research
determining the 'issues' (i.e., the precise legal differ from non-academic legal research that is
questions raised by the facts). undertaken by practitioners.
1
However, legal research has evolved significantly in recent times to include 'socio-legal' and 'law in context' approaches that have strong parallels with other disciplines in the
humanities.
43 Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers
Legal research may also be classified according to the Types of Legal Sources
nature of the research.This may range from descriptive
research, analytical research, quantitative research, The most frequent research method used by a
qualitative research, and conceptual research. While a practitioner entails the interpretation and analysis of
practitioner does not engage in all types of legal legal sources. The practitioner must know how to
research, there may be instances where the access and organize such sources. The key legal
practitioner's work may involve more than one type of sources used by practitioners include (1) statutes, (2)
legal research. subsidiary legislation (usually formulated by executive
officials acting under a statute), (3) case law, (4) treaty
Legal Research Methods and Methodology law, (5) treatises (an extensive and exhaustive book
on a specific subject, usually a legal topic. E.g. The Law
Research methods refer to the techniques and tools by of Evidence in Sri Lanka by G.L. Peiris (1974) is an
which one may research a subject or a topic. Research example of a treatise), and (6) legislative preparatory
methodology refers to the overall approach that work such as the Hansard.
specific research techniques and tools fall under. For
example, conducting focus group discussions and case Locating Legal Sources
studies may be the research 'methods' undertaken.The
overall 'methodology' in this regard may be termed as While online databases usually offer access to most
'qualitative' research methodology. research material, on occasion, physical copies may be
required. The following resource centres are useful for
The knowledge of methods and methodology provides the purpose of accessing legal material:
a good training to practitioners, as it helps the
practitioner to develop disciplined thinking in terms of
building an argument. 1. National Archives of Sri Lanka
2. Colombo Law Library
2. Accessing Resources and Organizing
Research 3. Bar Association Law Library
4. Centre for the Study of Human Rights
The process of locating relevant legal sources is a
crucial step in legal research.These include primary and 5. The Nadesan Centre
secondary sources of law.
6. Law and Society Trust
A. Developing a Fact Pattern Depending on the issue, the client may wish to institute
legal action, or if they are the responding party, to
A practitioner will gather the facts and documents contest the other party's claim. In the event that the
relating to the client's issue after the initial consultation. client wishes to institute action, there may be more
Thereafter, setting out a clear, chronological account of than one legal remedy available.
all relevant facts of the case or client inquiry, i.e.,
developing a 'fact pattern,' is useful, as the facts The practitioner should initiate any preliminary legal
generally form the descriptive part of the final legal steps that need to be taken to safeguard the best
output. This output could range from a petition, interests of the client. If the client wishes to settle, then
written submission, or a legal opinion. steps should be taken to ensure that the best possible
settlement is secured for the client.
Step 1: Introductory stage: obtaining basic client
information At this stage of the process, the practitioner should
provide an estimate of the fees that would be charged.
During the initial consultation, the client must be
addressed in a manner that puts them at ease. It is the Stage 4: Examine documents, persons, and scenes, and
stage at which a practitioner introduces themselves hold follow-up consultations
and exchanges a few courteous remarks.
Inspect and thoroughly examine all documents,
Simple questions should be used to confirm important exhibits, and other material made available. If possible,
details and client background information. Depending interview eye-witnesses to the alleged event to obtain
on the nature of the case, client information can include their version of the facts and any other potential
name, address, date of birth, period of time at current witnesses who may have information relevant to the
address, family relationships, educational history, case. If applicable, examine the scene of the alleged
employment history, criminal history, immediate event.
medical needs, and emergency contact information.
The practitioner should exercise discretion on the Stage 5: Finalizing the fact pattern
extent of the client information required, and not
request irrelevant information, which could amount to Once all information with respect to the facts of a case
an intrusion into the client's privacy. have been duly received and recorded, a practitioner
should prepare a written 'fact pattern' or chronology
Step 2: Fact-gathering stage (i.e. the timeline of the event, and the key facts
leading up to the event). This fact pattern will feed
Gather more specific information about the matter the into a legal output such as a plaint or petition.
client wishes to discuss and obtain advice on.
Moreover, an issue of law can be procedural. For R Rule (relevant law): What are the relevant legal
example, the question of whether a respondent is principles derived from statutes and case law tied to the
statutorily entitled to raise the time bar objection (i.e., issue identified? Establish the governing legal rule(s)
where the appellant has delayed in filing the appeal) that the court will employ to resolve that issue.
before a court may be considered an issue of
procedural law. A Application of relevant law to the facts: apply the
rule to the facts, using the statutory provisions and
An issue of fact is an issue concerning the factual cases discussed in the rule section to draw analogies or
elements or the material facts of the dispute. For distinctions. What is the evidence that supports the
instance, whether or not a party accepted a gift is an client's position? Are any of the defences relevant?
issue of fact.
C Conclusion: concisely state the outcome of the
A practitioner may begin 'issue spotting' by asking analysis based on the application of the rule(s) to the
several preliminary questions.These can be a mix of the facts of the case.
following questions:
C. The Authoritative Value of Sources
Who are the parties?
Once the relevant legal issues have been identified, the
If applicable, what is their relationship
to each other? legal practitioner must identify all relevant legal
authorities3 that can help answer the questions arising
What were their actions? from the identified issues.
Who was affected by their actions?
Bear in mind that the discussed legal sources will have
How were they affected? arguments that will strengthen or weaken one's case. It
is the practitioner's task to take a relevant argument
Thereafter, a practitioner can use the following steps and meld it into their case in a manner that is beneficial
for issue identification: to their case.
1. Identify each area of law possibly involved The authoritative value of a source of law depends
2. Identify the elements necessary for a cause of on the type of source. Such value also depends on
action under each law identified whether the specific legal authority is regarded as
3. Apply the elements of the law to the client's binding or persuasive and which court was involved
in its development. The location of a court within a
facts to determine the key facts
hierarchy is especially important in this regard.
4. Identify the relevant legal issue(s)
2
Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, Wex at https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/question_of_law.
3
See section on legal sources.
The 'literal approach' and the 'purposive approach' to 1. A hierarchy of 2. A system of law
interpretation are the most commonly used courts: a decision is reporting. E.g. the
approaches to statutory interpretation. The literal binding on a bench of New Law Reports,
approach focuses on the ordinary grammatical lesser authority. Thus, Sri Lanka Law
meaning of words in a statute. Under this approach, it is necessary for Reports.
deviation from the ordinary meaning can take place there to be a clearly
only in exceptional and definitive circumstances. graded hierarchy of
authority.
E.g. to avoid absurdity and to resolve ambiguity. The
purposive approach focuses on promoting the general
legislative purpose underlying the provision. It allows F. Comparative Jurisprudence
one to look beyond the ordinary meaning of the words
and delve into the intention of the legislature. In Sri Lanka, Indian, South African, and English cases are
of persuasive authority. However, they are not
E. Interpreting Judgments considered binding authorities. Comparative
jurisprudence allows a legal practitioner to study and
When using caselaw, the practitioner must be able analyze a similar law in a foreign jurisdiction.This would
familiar with key terms and concepts. Here are some involve the comparison of laws, norms, and regulations
salient ones: of other countries. Comparative jurisprudence can
have additional benefits. For example, it may reveal an
Ratio decidendi: the main rationale of the judicial area of the law that requires reform.
decision. It is the principle of law on which the court
reaches its decision. The ratio of a case must be G. Preparing Legal Arguments and Output
deduced from its material facts, the reasons the court
gives for reaching its decision, and the decision itself. The final stage of legal research involves developing the
Only the ratio of a case is binding on inferior courts, legal output.This output will contain the legal argument
by reason of the doctrine of precedent (see stare that the practitioner intends to present on behalf of
decisis). The task of extracting and applying the ratio of a their client. This stage would entail writing a petition or
case will fall on a judge in a subsequent case. written submissions in the context of litigation or
writing a legal opinion in the context of a client inquiry.
Obiter dicta: ancillary judicial pronouncements found
in case law. They are the remarks made by a judge in The legal authorities used in the legal output must be
passing while setting out the judgment. It is not essential appropriately cited so that a reader can understand the
to the decision in the case. It does not create binding basis for a particular argument.
precedent, as it does not form any part of the ratio.
4
Black's Law Dictionary (8th Edition, 2004).
A practitioner must bear in mind the professional These mechanisms range from negotiation (informal or
boundaries that define the appropriate interaction formal), conciliation, mediation, and arbitration.
between an Attorney-at-Law and a client.
If the relevant contract has an arbitration clause, a
A legal practitioner must always ensure that they practitioner must inform the client that the matter can
remain within their area of expertise. only be resolved through arbitration.
50
INTRODUCTION
Systemic delays and inefficiencies in the process of As such, lawyers have a duty to guide/advise their
dispute resolution through 'litigation' inevitably result clients to select the most appropriate method of
in the deprivation of timely and effective justice for dispute resolution, to craft innovative solutions, and to
disputants. secure effective justice for the specific dispute in
question. As lawyers, it is part of our responsibility
Therefore, it is important to note that litigation is not to properly assess the dispute and identify the most
the only method of dispute resolution. appropriate dispute resolution method, if we are to
ensure efficiency as well as effectiveness of dispute
When each and every dispute is taken to litigation resolution and if we genuinely want to help the
without proper assessment of the dispute and an disputant/client to save relationships, cost, and time.
informed understanding of the most appropriate
methods of resolution, negative implications ensue for Let us first understand the different ways in
the disputants as well as the system of justice, due to which disputes can be resolved. These range
wasteful and inappropriate allocation of time, from informal to formal mechanisms of dispute
resources, and cost. resolution.
ADR SPECTRUM
The full spectrum of Alternative Dispute Resolution processes go from informal/consensual processes where
the parties retain control and decide the outcome - to formal/adjudicative processes where the parties cede
control and the neutral decides the outcome.
EARLY NEUTRAL
EVALUATION/
NEGOTIATION FACILITATION MEDIATION CONCILIATION ARBITRATION LITIGATION
CONTRACTUAL
ADJUDICATION
INFORMAL/CONSENSUAL FORMAL/ADJUDICATIVE
Parties retain control over the process Parties cede control over the process
Parties decide the outcome Neutral decides the outcome
Party Autonomy
over the Dispute
Resolution
Process and the
Final Outcome
Formality
Involvement of
Attorneys-at-Law
Enforceability of
the Outcome
Key legislation providing for different dispute » Commercial Mediation: Commercial Mediation
resolution methods (Mediation, Conciliation, and Centre of Sri Lanka Act No. 44 of 2000 (Not
Arbitration) Functioning)
» Companies Act No. 07 of 2007 (Disputes
Board - Not Functioning)
Arbitration » No financial limit
» Not free
» 100 percent party autonomy in selecting the
» Arbitration Act No. 11 of 1995 (note that mediators
section 14 of the Act provides for other » Ad-hoc or institutional
methods of settlement such as mediation and
conciliation)
Other Legislations Providing for
Arbitration, Mediation, and Conciliation
Community Mediation
When a client brings a dispute to you and seeks your legal advice on how to resolve the dispute, you can follow
the steps below:
Check the contract, if any, and read the dispute resolution clause carefully
Analyze the pros and cons of selecting one method over the other
Analyze which process will best overcome barriers to resolution, specific to the dispute
Discuss the ability of your client to afford each type of dispute resolution method
The most important thing in this process is actively This is provided for in Section 408 of the Civil
listening to your client and asking relevant questions. Procedure Code and Section 14 of the Arbitration
This will help you diagnose the dispute and the most Act No. 11 of 1995, respectively.4
effective method of resolution for that particular
dispute. Therefore, if you as lawyers assess that there is scope
for settlement of a dispute pending before a court or an
Please remember that every dispute is different and as arbitral tribunal, it is very much within your
such, every dispute needs to be resolved through the professional role to encourage and guide parties
method that matches that particular dispute. As lawyers through an effective settlement process.
we should not take our clients to court on every
dispute but only for disputes which require the Amicable settlement through negotiation, mediation,
intervention of the judicial mind. or conciliation will achieve effective and efficient
solutions, preserve the productivity and cohesiveness
Also be mindful of the hybrid dispute resolution of the relationship, and reduce costs for the disputants
processes. Even when a matter is pending in court, or and the State.
even in Arbitration, parties have the right to attempt
to resolve the dispute amicably out of court.
4
Court of Appeal ( Mediation in Appeals) Rule 1990 provides for the mediation of appeals in Court of Appeal, by the Court of Appeal Justices. However, this rule is
yet to come in to force. Nevertheless in practice, almost in every court, judges allow out of court settlements to be filed in Court, in resolution of matters that
are pending before Court, including in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
55
INTRODUCTION
Equity
The legal profession/justice system must reflect the Society and social institutions generally looks to the
diversity of the population it serves. leaders of the legal profession and justice system in
directing its course.
The lack of diversity within the profession and judiciary
for instance may influence the level of public confidence Where the leadership in the justice system is diverse, it
in the administration of justice, especially among will surely influence the diversity among government
vulnerable communities and groups who are often and business leadership.
under represented and subject to exclusion.
Gender Equality
A range of quality professionals:
An important topic relating to social inclusion is
A commitment to diversity and inclusion will ensure 'gender' or 'gender equality'. Gender may be
the profession and justice system includes skilled considered a separate social group that merits
persons from all groups and communities.This will also separate discussion given that we, all of us, relate to
ensure a better representation of the different some form of gender identity.
'interests' and 'rights' that must essentially be
vindicated by the justice system (especially in cases of The concept of 'gender' is not easy to understand and
public law/ public interest law). has evolved over time to be more inclusive of persons
who, at times fall outside traditional definitions of
Innovation and perspective: gender.
As in other sectors, diversity in the justice system While this section will attempt to highlight why it is
can promote diverse perspectives and innovation necessary for law practitioners and judicial actors to
in implementing effective justice that is inclusive understand this concept, it is by no means an exhaustive
and relevant to all segments of society. discussion of gender (see further reading listed below).
A more informal use of the term gender is to refer Gender identity is often confused with
to the 'biological sex' of a person, or the sexual orientation. The latter is about who one is
biological, reproductive characteristics that a person is physically and emotionally attracted to in
born with. A person's gender reference in this relation to one's own gender/sexuality.
approach is necessarily either male or female, but
'gender' is something different to one's biological sex. For example, a man may be attracted to another
man and hence his sexual orientation may
The term is used to refer not just to the 'sex' of a be referred to as 'gay', but his gender identity as a
person, but to social and cultural expectations of 'male' is not impacted.
'who' or 'what' a person should be. Hence, it is not
merely a matter of the biological sex of the person, but Not about women's empowerment:
about the roles and behaviors that is ascribed to
them by society (see for further discussion under Gender is often confused with women's
'stereotype'). empowerment movements. While a more
progressive approach to gender may complement
An evolving approach is that gender cannot be women's empowerment initiatives, gender
something 'binary' and must be inclusive of persons should not be confused as one and the same thing.
who do not necessarily view themselves as a man or
a woman or reflect characteristics or personality Not something political:
traits that are commonly associated with a man or
woman (as the case may be). The use of the word gender has come to be
associated with programs and projects that are of
In this approach, gender may be understood and Western origins and hence as a tool of political
expressed in a range of ways that is 'gender influence and socio-cultural transformation. It is,
fluid' (and not in reference to the gender-binary of however, merely a concept that factors in the
man or woman). This approach is more inclusive of realities of human identities and relations.
persons who are biologically neither man nor woman
(example - intersex persons2 ), and of persons whose It is important for judicial actors and law practitioners
gender identity is different to their biological sex to be sensitive to the issues and challenges confronting
(among other gender identities). persons of different gender identities.
It is often a complex task to go against popular, socio- The discussions in this section are intended to be a
cultural notions, and hence a person may be subject starting point in a continued discovery of how the
to disadvantage and exclusion by virtue of justice system can be more inclusive and equitable. It
stereotypical thinking unless it is actively addressed. aims to provide the reader with some key concepts and
realities concerning the integration of vulnerable
groups within the justice system (including their
Impact of stereotypical thinking on the better integration in the legal profession). It has been
attainment of justice:3 compiled in recognition that the law professional
plays a vital and significant role in this regard.
Stereotyping permeates the various stages of
the legal process: the investigation, trial, and Further Reading:
judgment phases. Accordingly, judges,
magistrates, and adjudicators are not the only 1. Naomi Mezey, Law as Culture, 13Yale. J.L. & Human.
actors in the justice system that apply, 35.46 (2001).
perpetuate, and reinforce stereotypes. 2. Cordelia (2010). Delusions of Gender: How Our
Prosecutors, law enforcement officials, and Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create
other actors can allow stereotypes to Difference. W.W. Norton
influence investigations, trials, and ultimately 3. United Nations General Assembly, Report of
the judgment. OHCHR, Summary Report on the
Recommendations of the Panel Discussion on
Prosecutors and judges should identify, Gender Stereotyping and on Women's Human
challenge, and dismantle stereotypes that Rights in the Context of Sustainable Development
occur in the justice system. This not only Agenda, (2014)
means that judges and prosecutors must not 4. CEDAW General Recommendation No. 33 on
engage in discriminatory behavior nor engage Women's Access to Justice, (2015) and related
in gender stereotyping themselves, but they recommendations and comments of the CEDAW
must also adopt gender sensitive approaches Committee and other treaty bodies
to the application of law and counter the 5. See: https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/
myths and stereotypes present in laws or aba-news-archives/2018/09/new-study-finds-
submitted by any of the parties. gender-and-racial-bias-endemic-in-legal-professi1/
3
Taken from USAID's Efficient and Effective Justice Activity's Participants' Manual on Gender Equality and Social Inclusion - Dr. Charles Ericksen. USAID's Efficient and
Effective Justice Activity. Prepared by Gender Resources, Inc. 2022.
4
Ibid
A
FORMAT OF A PLAINT
The Plaint of the Plaintiff above named appearing by ……………, his Attorney-at-Law states as follows;
1. The Plaintiff above named is a duly incorporated Company under the laws of Sri Lanka with the
capacity to sue and be sued in its corporate name having its registered office and/or the principle
place of business at the aforementioned address and inter alia , sales and supplies computers,
electronic devices, equipment, accessories and spare parts in its usual course of business.
The Plaintiff files herewith marked ‘P1’ and pleads as part and parcel hereof, a true copy of the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Plaintiff dated 20-12-2003.
3. The Defendant resides and the causes of action hereinafter set forth arose within the local limits
of Jurisdiction of this Court.
4. The Plaintiff pleads that the Plaintiff entered into a Dealership Agreement for sale of computers,
electronic devices, equipment, accessories and spare parts with the Defendant.
5. The Plaintiff pleads that, the Plaintiff from time to time supplied inter alia , computers, electronic
devices, equipment, accessories and spare parts to the Defendant on credit. The Defendant is
obliged to sell the same and remit the monies due to the Plaintiff after retaining a commission.
6. The Plaintiff pleads that the Defendant from time to time, in consideration of the aforesaid
supplying of computers, electronic devices, equipment, accessories and spare parts by the
Plaintiff, handed over a cheque to the Plaintiff and promised to settle the outstanding amount in
due course;
8. The Plaintiff pleads that the aforesaid cheque got dishonored with the endorsement “Refer to
Drawer”.
The Plaintiff files herewith marked ‘P2’ and pleads as part and parcel hereof, the Cheque Return
Notification relating to the aforesaid cheque bearing No. 000056 dated 15-07-2021.
9. The Plaintiff pleads that the Plaintiff Company duly gave Notice of Dishonor to the Defendant.
10. In the circumstances the Plaintiff Company pleads that a cause of action has arisen to sue the
Defendant for the sum of Rs.4,000,000/-on the cheque bearing No. 000056 dated 15-07-2021
drawn on Green Bank, City Branch.
11. The Plaintiff Company pleads that a sum of Rs.4,000,000/- is justly due to the Plaintiff Company,
on the cheque bearing No.000056 dated 15-07-2021 drawn on Green Bank City Branch.
12. The Plaintiff further pleads that on or about the …………. the Plaintiff justly made a demand
from the Defendant to make immediate payment of a sum of Rs.4,000,000/- being the sum due to
the Plaintiff on the aforementioned dishonoured cheque after having given credit for moneys paid
by the Defendant to the Plaintiff.
13. The Plaintiff pleads that the Defendant has up-to-date failed and/or neglected to comply or even
respond to the aforesaid Letter of Demand sent by the Plaintiff.
14. The Plaintiff values this action at Rs.4,000,000/- for the purpose of stamp duty.
15. The Affidavit of the General Manager of the Plaintiff Company is filed herewith in support of the
averments contained herein.
(a) Issue summons to the Defendant in accordance with the form No. 19 in the First
Schedule.
(b) Judgment in favour of the Plaintiff in a sum of Rs.4,000,000/- together with legal interest
due from the date of filling of this action till payment in full;
(d) Such other and further relief as to Your Hounor’s Court shall seem meet.
REGISTERED ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
FOR THE PLAINTIFF
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANT
On this day of December 2022
The Answer of the Defendant above named (or defendants as the case may be ) appearing by
……………, his Attorney-at-Law states as follows;
1. The Defendant denies all and singular the several averments set out in the Plaint, save except
those that are hereinafter specifically admitted.
2. The Defendant admits the averments contained in paragraph 1 of the Plaint of the Plaintiff.
3. The Defendant specifically denies the averments contained in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Plaint
and puts the Plaintiff to the strict proof thereof.
4. The Defendant admits the averments contained in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Plaint of the Plaintiff.
5. The Defendant denies the averments contained in paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Plaint and
states that the Defendant had handed over several cheques to the Plaintiff as security.
6. Answering the averments contained in paragraph 11 of the Plaint, the Defendant only admits the
bare receipt of the Letter of Demand sent through the Attorney- at-Law for the Plaintiff .
a. The Defendant has duly paid and settled all outstanding sums due to the Plaintiff;
b. The Plaintiff is seeking to unjustly enrich itself by presenting a cheque handed over to
Plaintiff as a security by the Defendant.
8. The Defendant states that the Plaintiff is not entitled to the sums claimed in this action.
10. The Defendant paid a sum of Rs. 3,000,000/- as an advance payment to a stock of computer
accessories on or about 5th January 2022 to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff undertook to deliver the
same on or before 4th April 2022.
11. The Plaintiff has wrongfully failed and neglected to deliver the said goods or repay the Defendant
the said sum of Rs.3,000,000/- though obliged to do so and thereto often demanded.
12. In the premises aforesaid, a cause of action has accrued to the Defendant to sue the Plaintiff for
the recovery of the said sum of Rs.3,000,000/- together with legal interest thereon from date
hereof until date of Decree and thereafter, legal interest on the aggregate sum of Decree until
payment in full.
WHEREFORE , the Defendant respectfully prays Y our Honor’s Court be pleased to: -
(b) Enter judgment and Decree in favour of the Defendant in a sum of Rs.3,000,000/-
together with legal interest thereon from date hereof until date of Decree and thereafter
legal interest on the aggregate sum of the Decree until payment in full on the First Cause
of Action;
(d) Grant such further and other relief as to the Court shall seem meet.
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANT
On this day of December 2022
The Replication of the Plaintiff above named (or defendants as the case may be ) appearing by
……………, his Attorney-at-Law states as follows;
1. The Plaintiff denies all and singular the several averments set out in the Answer, save except
those that are hereinafter specifically admitted.
2. The Plaintiff joins issue with the Defendant in respect of the several denials contained in the
Answer.
3. The Plaintiff admits the averments contained in paragraph 2 of the Answer of the Defendant.
4. The Plaintiff specifically denies the averments contained in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Answer and
reiterates the averments contained in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the Plaint.
5. The Plaintiff denies the averments contained in paragraph 5 of the Answer, and reiterates the
averments contained in paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Plaint.
6. The Plaintiff denies the averments contained in paragraph 6 of the Answer, and reiterates the
averments contained in paragraph 11 of the Plaint.
8. The Plaintiff denies the averments contained in paragraphs 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Answer, and
puts the Defendant to strict proof thereof.
b. Judgment and Decree be entered in favour of the Plaintiff as prayed for in the prayer to the Plaint;
d. Such other and further relief as to this Court may seem meet be granted.
I, NIMAL SILVA of No. 8, Temple Road, Colombo 6 being a Roman Catholic do hereby make oath and
state as follows:-
2. I swear to the matters contained herein from my personal knowledge, on advice, and from
knowledge gained by perusing records, documents, files and data, which are in my possession
and/or have been made available to me.
3. I state that I have paid and settled all the outstanding monies due to New Computers (Private)
Limited.
AFFIDAVIT
(OF A BUDDHIST, HINDU, OR MUSLIM, OR OF SOME OTHER RELIGION ACCORDING TO
WHICH OATHS ARE NOT OF BINDING FORCE )
I, GAMINI PERERA, of No. 4, Pannipitiya Road, Maharagama being a Buddhist do hereby solemnly,
sincerely and truly affirm and declare as follows:
2. I affirm to the matters contained herein from my personal knowledge, on advice, and from
knowledge gained by perusing records, documents, files and data, which are in my possession
and/or have been made available to me.
ADMISSIONS
ISSUES
1. Did the Defendant tender the cheque for a sum of Rs.4,000,000/- bearing No. 000056 dated 15-
07-2021 drawn on Green Bank City Branch, in favour of the Plaintiff Company?
2. Did the aforesaid cheque get dishonored with the endorsement “Refer to Drawer?
3. Did the Plaintiff Company duly give Notice of Dishonor to the Defendant?
4. Is a sum of Rs.4,000,000/- is justly due to the Plaintiff Company, on the said cheque bearing
No.000056 dated 15-07-2021 drawn on Green Bank City Branch?
5. Did the Plaintiff justly make a demand from the Defendant to make immediate payment of a sum
of Rs.4,000,000/- being the sum due to the Plaintiff on the aforementioned dishonoured cheque?
6. Has the Defendant up-to-date failed and/or neglected to comply or even respond to the aforesaid
Letter of Demand sent by the Plaintiff?
7. If the above Issues are answered in favour of the Plaintiff, is the Plaintiff entitled to the relief
prayed for in the prayer to the Plaint?
I tender herewith the List of Witnesses and Documents of the Plaintiff above-named and move that
Y our Honour's Court be pleased to accept same, direct the same be filed of record and issue summons on
the witnesses named herein.
LIST OF WITNESSES
1. Chief Executive Officer and/or his agent, New Computer Private Limited, No. 420/1, Lake Road,
Maharagama.
2. Nilantha Samaratunga, Managing Director, Vision Global Private Limited, No. 5, 1st Floor,
V auxhall Street, Colombo 2
3. Managing Director and/or his agent, Vision Global Private Limited, No. 5, 1st Floor, Vauxhall
Street, Colombo 2
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
1. Letter dated 13.04.2021 and its attachments sent by the Defendant to the Plaintiff.
2. Cheque return Notice in respect of the Cheque bearing No. 000056 dated 15-07-2021 drawn on
Green Bank City Branch for a sum of Rs. 4,000,000/-
Notice is hereby given to the Defendant under Section 66 of the Evidence Ordinance to produce
the originals of the documents mentioned above which are in the custody of the Defendant at each
and every date of trial hereinafter. Please note that in the event of your failure to comply with the
aforesaid, the secondary evidence in respect of the said documents will be led on behalf of the
Plaintiff in terms of the provisions of Section 66 of the Evidence Ordinance.
REGISTERED ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
FOR THE PLAINTIFF
MOTION
WHEREAS Your Honour's Court directed the parties to tender their respective Written Submissions on
07th December 2022;
I tender herewith the Written Submissions on behalf of the Plaintiff above-named and respectfully move
that Your Honour's Court be pleased to accept the same and direct the same be filed of Record.
A copy of this Motion together with the Written Submissions have been sent by Registered Post to the
Registered Attorney-at-Law for the Defendant and the relevant Registered Postal Article receipt is
attached herewith as proof thereof.
REGISTERED ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
FOR THE PLAINTIFF
Thilak Alwis
No: 30, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Complainant
Accused
The complainantabovenamed appearing by his Attorney -at -Law Kamal Perera, states as
followsby way of his complaint:
1) The complainant states that on the 2nd of January 2022, he saw a newspaper
advertisement where the Accusedabove named, had advertised a car bearing Registration
No: WP CAB 3456 to be sold at a price of Rs. 5,000,000/=.
2) The complainant states that he contacted the accused using the information given in the
paper advertisement and went to meet him at the address above mentioned on 05.01.2022
in order to inspect the vehicle.
3) The complainant states that the Accused stated that the car had been taken by his brother
to Kataragama for a pilgrimage and that an advance of Rs. 50,000/= may be paid to the
4) The complainant states that having believe the accused, he handed over a sum of Rs.
50,000/ to the Accused in cash and obtained a receipt and the accused informed the
complainant to come on the following day to inspect the car.
A true copy of the said receipt issued by the accused when he obtained the sum of Rs.
50,000/= from the complainant, is annexed herewith marked as “ P 2” and is pleaded as
part and parcel of this application.
5) The complainant states that thereafter, the accused never answered the phone, and when
he went to the address above mentioned, the house was closed up and abandoned. On
inquiring from the residents in the area, the complainant was informed that the said house
had been closed up for several years and that no one had been living there permanently.
6) The complainant therefore states that the Accused has committed the offence of
“cheating” which is punishable under section 403 of the Penal Code through deception by
obtaining a sum of Rs. 50,000/= as a purported advance to sell a car.
7) The complainant states that he has not previously invoked the jurisdiction of Your
Honour‟s Court concerning this matter.
8) The complainant states that if inadvertently hehas failed to submit any document which is
necessary for Your Honour‟s Court to determine thisapplication, thecomplainant may be
permitted to submit same with notice to the accused.
……………... ……………………………………….
Complainant Attorney-at-Law for the Complainant
List of Witnesses:
……………... ……………………………………….
Complainant Attorney-at-Law for the Complainant
CHARGE SHEET
Case No:
On or about the 5th of January 2022, in Colombo 08, which is within the jurisdiction of this
Court, you did commit the offence of “cheating” which is punishable under section 403 of the
Penal Code by obtaining a sum of Rs. 50,000/= from Thilak Alwis of No: 30, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08 by deceiving him that the said sum was an advance payment for the purchase of
vehicle bearing Registration No: WP CAB 3456.
………………….
Magistrate
PETITION OF APPEAL
Complainant
Accused
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Accused-Appellant
V.
1) Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Complainant-Respondent
2nd Respondent
TO: THE HONORABLE HIGH COURT JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF THE
WESTERN PROVINCE HOLDEN IN COLOMBO
2) The Appellant pleaded “not-guilty” to the above chargeand the evidence of the following
witnesses were led on behalf of the prosecution:
3) After the conclusion of the prosecution case, the Appellant made a dock statement and
concluded the defense case.
4) Thereafter, written-submissions were filed on behalf of the Appellant and the case was
fixed for Judgment to be delivered on the 1st of November 2022.
5) On the 1st of November 2022, the Learned Magistrate delivered the finaljudgment,
convicting the Appellant of the charge. On the same day, the Learned Magistrate called
for a fingerprint report for punishments to be imposed on the 15th of November 2022.
6) The Appellant who is aggrieved by the final judgment dated 01.11.2022 in Colombo
Magistrate Court Case No:4567/22/1, submits this Petition of Appeal against the said
conviction based on the following grounds of appeal:
iii. The Learned Magistrate has failed to properly consider defense version and
the reasonable doubt
WHEREFORE the Accused-Appellant prays that Your Honor’s Court be pleased to:
a) Set aside the conviction dated 01.11.2022 in Colombo Magistrate Court Case
No:4567/22/1,
b) Grant such other and further relief as may seem meet to Y our Honour’s Court.
I hereby certify that this Appeal contains matters of law which are fit for adjudication by Your
Honour’s Court.
Attorney-at-Law
PETITION
Complainant
Accused
Raj Kumar
No: 20, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
V.
1) Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Complainant-Respondent
2nd Respondent
TO: THE HONORABLE HIGH COURT JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF THE
WESTERN PROVINCE HOLDEN IN COLOMBO
1) The Petitioner states that the charge sheet against the Accused in the Magistrate Court of
Colombo in Case No: 1234/22/1 contained the following charge:
On or about the 5th of January 2022, in Borella, the Accused committed an offence
punishable under section 47 (1) of the Excise Ordinance as amended, by transporting
825 liters of Spirit in the Van bearing Registration No: WP PA 9676 in violation of the
Law.
2) The Petitioner states that the on the 15th of February 2022, the Accused Pleaded guilty to
the said charge and was sentenced accordingly. As the Petitioner made an application to
Court that he is the Registered Owner of the Van bearing Registration No: WP PA 9676
and that the said vehicle be released to him, the Learned Magistrate fixed the matter for an
inquiry to be held on the 2nd of March 2022 to decide whether the said vehicle should be
confiscated or released to the Petitioner.
3) The Petitioner states that on the 15th of February 2022, he gave evidence and stated that he
had entered into a written agreement with the Accused who had taken his van on hire to
use the vehicle as a school van. the Petitioner stated that he had no knowledge or
involvement concerning the alleged offence committed by the Accused. The Accused also
gave evidence on the same day, confirming the evidence of the Petitioner.
4) The Petitioner states that on the 2nd of March 2022, the Learned Magistrate delivered an
order confiscating the Van bearing Registration No: WP PA 9676.
A complete certified copy of the Case Record of Colombo Magistrate Court Case No:
1234/22/1 is annexed herewith marked as “ P 1” whereas the said confiscation order dated
02.03.2022 is marked as “ P 1 (a)” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this Application.
a) The Petitioner being the registered owner of the vehicle, had no knowledge or
involvement concerning the alleged offence committed by the Accused.
b) The agreement between the Petitioner and the Accused clearly states that the purpose
of giving the vehicle on hire, was for a school service, and not for any illegal activity.
c) The evidence of the Petitioner is corroborated by the evidence of the Accused, who
stated that the Petitioner had no knowledge or involvement in the alleged offence and
that the Accused takes full responsibility for same.
6) The Petitioner states that he has not previously invoked the jurisdiction of Your Honour’s
Court concerning this matter.
7) The Petitioner states that if inadvertently the Petitioner has failed to submit any document
which is necessary for Your Honour‟s Court to determine this application, the
Petitioner may be permitted to submit same with notice to the Respondents before the
hearing of this matter.
WHEREFORE the Petitioner prays that Y our Honour’s Court be pleased to:
b) Grant an order staying the execution of the confiscation order dated 02.03.2022 in
Colombo Magistrate Court Case No: 1234/22/1, until the final determination of this
application,
c) Set aside the confiscation order dated 02.03.2022 in Colombo Magistrate Court Case
No: 1234/22/1, grant an order releasing the said vehicle to the Petitioner,
d) Grant such other and further relief as may seem meet to Y our Honour’s Court.
MOTION
Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Complainant
Suspect
Whereas, in terms of order dated 10th of October 2022 a foreign travel ban has been imposed on
the suspect and whereas it has become necessary for the suspect to travel to India for medical
treatment within the month December 2022, it is respectfully pleaded that this case be called in
open Court on the 2nd of December 2022, in order that an application can be made to Your
Honour’s Court in this regard.
MOTION
Complainant
V.
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Accused
TO: THE HONORABLE HIGH COURT JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF THE
WESTERN PROVINCE HOLDEN IN COLOMBO
Whereas, by order dated 10th of January 2022, a foreign travel ban has been imposed on the
Accused, and whereas it has become necessary for the Accused to travel to India for urgent
medical treatment during the month of December 2022, it is respectfully pleaded that this case be
called in open Court on the 6th of December 2022 in order that an application can be made to
Your Honour’s Court in this regard.
True copies of documents pertaining to this application which are relied upon by the Accused,
are annexed herewith marked as “X 1”.
PETITION OF APPEAL
Court of Appeal
Case No: Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Complainant
Accused
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Accused-Appellant
V.
Respondent
On or about the 5th of January 2018, in Borella, the Accused committed the offence of
murder which punishable under section 296 of the Penal Code by causing the death of
Saman Fernando.
2) The Appellant pleaded “not-guilty” to the above chargeand the evidence of the following
witnesses were led on behalf of the prosecution:
3) The following documents and productions were marked in the course of the prosecution
case:
4) After the conclusion of the prosecution case, the Appellant made a dock statement and
concluded the defense case.
5) Thereafter, written-submissions were filed on behalf of the Appellant and the case was
fixed for Judgment to be delivered on the 20th of November 2022.
6) On the 20th of November 2022, the Learned High Court Judge delivered the judgment
convicting the Appellant for committing the offence of murder and imposed the death
sentence on the Appellant.
7) The Appellant who is aggrieved by the final judgment and sentence dated 20.11.2022 in
Colombo High Court Case No: HC 55/20 submits this Petition of Appeal against the said
conviction and punishment, based on the following grounds of appeal:
i. The alleged “dying declaration” implicating the Appellant which was led in
the course of the evidence of PW 01 (wife of the deceased) ought to have been
ii. The evidence of PW 01 and PW 02 stating that there was a previous animosity
between the deceased and the appellant, is inadequate to convict the
Appellant for committing the offence of murder.
iii. The Learned High Court Judge has failed to properly consider the reasonable
doubt which arises in the prosecution case itself.
iv. The Learned High Court Judge has failed to properly consider the dock
statement of the Appellant.
WHEREFORE the Accused-Appellant prays that Y our Lordship's Court be pleased to:
a) Set aside the conviction and sentence dated 20.11.2022, of the Learned High Court
Judge of Colombo in High Court Case No: HC 55/20,
b) Grant such other and further relief as may seem meet to Y our Lordship's Court.
PETITION
Court of AppealRevision
Application Case No: Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Complainant
2) Kumar Jayaratne
No: 15, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Anula Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Petitioner
V.
1) Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Complainant-Respondent
2nd Respondent
Petitioner- Petitioner
V.
1) Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Complainant-Respondent -Respondent
2nd Respondent-Respondent
1) The Petitioner states that she is the wife of Ajith Silva, the suspect abovenamed and that
she is a mother of two children aged 02 and 05.
(A complete certified copy of Colombo High Court Bail Application Case No: HC BA
10/22 is annexed herewith marked as “ P 1” and the true copy of the Marriage Certificate
of the Petitioner and the Birth Certificates of her two children are annexed herewith
2) The Petitioner states that her husband is the sole breadwinner of the family and until his
arrest and incarceration, he was supporting the family as a three-wheeler driver.
3) The Petitioner states that on the 4th of January 2022, her husband left home in his three-
wheeler at about 7 am, for a hire but did not return in the evening as usual and his mobile
phone was not functioning.
4) The Petitioner states that her brother (Suresh Mendis) came to her house at about 8pm
and informed her that her husband had been arrested and is now placed in custody at the
Borella Police Station.
5) The Petitioner states that she immediately went to the Borella Police Station, at about
8.30pm and saw that her husband was kept in a cell but she was not permitted to speak
with her husband.
6) The Petitioner states that a Police Officer informed her that her husband had been
arrested while carrying a packet of heroin in his trouser pocket and that he will be
produced before Court on the following day.
7) The Petitioner states that on the 6th of January 2022, her husband was produced to the
Colombo Magistrate Court No: 01 under Case No: B. 2323/22/1 and was further
remanded. Another individual who was referred to as the 2nd suspect, was also produced
before Court and remanded along with the Petitioner’s husband.
8) The Petitioner states that according to the B Report dated 06.01.2022, filed by the
Complainant-Respondent, it was the 2nd suspect (Kumar Jayaratne) who was the
passenger of the three-wheeler, who had allegedly been in possession of 05 grams of
heroin. The husband of the Petitioner, named as the 1 st suspect had only been the driver of
the three-wheeler.
(The certified copy of the B report dated 06.01.2022 is annexed herewith marked as “P 1
(d)” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
9) The Petitioner states that her husband was merely going on a three-wheeler hire and had
no knowledge of the contents of the pockets of the passenger of the three-wheeler, at the
time he was arrested on 05.01.2022.
(A true copy of the Diagnostic Card issued by the National Hospital of Sri Lanka,
concerning the heart ailment of the Petitioner‟s husband is annexed herewith marked as
“P 1 (e)” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
11) The Petitioner states that a Bail Application was filed in the High Court of Colombo
which was listed as HCBA 10/22, in order to obtain bail for her husband.
12) The Petitioner states that objections dated 4th of March 2022, were filed on behalf of the
Hon. Attorney General.
A certified copy of the said objections is annexed herewith marked as “P 1 (f)” and is
pleaded as part and parcel of this application.
13) The Petitioner states that on the 25th of March 2022, the bail inquiry was taken up and on
the same day, the Learned High Court Judge delivered an order rejecting bail.
A certified copy of the said order dated 25.03.2022 is annexed herewith marked as “P 1
(g)” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this application.
14) The Petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 25.03.2022, of the Learned High Court
Judge of Colombo in Bail Application Case No: HC BA 10/22 submits this Revision
Application based on the following circumstances, which in its totality may amount to
“exceptional circumstances”:
a) The material reported to Court by the Complainant-Respondent does not disclose that
the 1st suspect was aware that the 2nd suspect was hiding narcotics in his trouser
pocket.
b) The incarceration of the 1st suspect who is a heart patient, may cause a danger to the
health of the 1st suspect.
c) The 1st suspect is the sole breadwinner of his family, and due to his incarceration, the
Petitioner and his two children are left destitute.
15) The Petitioner states that the jurisdiction of Your Lordships Court has not been
previously invoked in respect of this matter.
WHEREFORE the Petitioner prays that Your Lordship's Court be pleased to:
b) Set aside the order dated 25.03.2022 of the Learned High Court Judge of Colombo in
Bail Application Case No: HC BA 10/22,
c) Enlarge the husband of the Petitioner (1st suspect) on Bail, on conditions that may be
acceptable to Your Lordship's Court,
d) Grant such other and further relief as may seem meet to Y our Lordship's Court.
PETITION
Court of Appeal V.
Case No: CA 105/21
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Accused
High Court of Colombo
Case No: HC 55/20
And then Between
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Accused-Appellant
V.
Respondent
Accused-Appellant- Petitioner
V.
Respondent-Petitioner
TO: HIS LORDSHIP THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE OTHER HONORABLE
JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA.
1) The indictment against the Petitioner in Colombo High Court Case No: HC 55/20
contained the following charge:
On or about the 5th of January 2018, in Borella, the Accused committed the offence of
murder which punishable under section 296 of the Penal Code by causing the death of
Saman Fernando.
2) The Petitioner pleaded “not-guilty” to the above chargeand the evidence of the following
witnesses were led on behalf of the prosecution:
3) The following documents and productions were marked in the course of the prosecution
case:
5) Thereafter, final submissions were made on behalf of the Petitioner and the case was
fixed for Judgment to be delivered on the 20th of November 2021.
6) On the 20th of November 2021, the Learned High Court Judge delivered the judgment
convicting the Petitioner for committing the offence of murder and imposed the death
sentence on the Petitioner.
7) The Appellant who is aggrieved by the final judgment and sentence dated 20.11.2021 in
Colombo High Court Case No: HC 55/20filed an Appeal against the said conviction and
punishment, based on the following grounds of appeal:
i. The alleged “dying declaration” implicating the Appellant which was led in
the course of the evidence of PW 01 (wife of the deceased) ought to have been
disregarded, due to the reason that the evidence of the PW 03- Consultant
JMO confirms that the deceased could not have spoken after he received the
injuries to his neck.
iii. The Learned High Court Judge has failed to properly consider the reasonable
doubt which arises in the prosecution case itself.
iv. The Learned High Court Judge has failed to properly consider the dock
statement of the Appellant.
8) The Petitioner states that the said Appeal was listed in the Court of Appeal as Court of
Appeal Case No: CA 105/21 and written – submissions were filed on behalf of the
Petitioner as well as the Hon. Attorney General and argument was held on 26 th of June
2022.
9) The Petitioner states that by Judgment dated 5 th of August 2022, the Court of Appeal
dismissed the Appeal and affirmed the conviction and death sentence imposed by the
High Court.
10) The Petitioner states that he is aggrieved by the order of the Court of Appeal dated 5 th of
August 2022, in Court of Appeal Case No: CA 105/21 and the Petitioner moves Your
Lordship's Court to grant Special Leave to Appeal to Your Lordship's Court on the
a) The alleged “dying declaration” implicating the Petitioner which was led in the
course of the evidence of PW 01 (wife of the deceased) ought to have been
disregarded, due to the reason that the evidence of the PW 03- Consultant JMO
confirms that the deceased could not have spoken after he received the injuries to
his neck.
c) The Learned High Court Judge has failed to properly consider the reasonable
doubt which arises in the prosecution case itself.
d) The Learned High Court Judge has failed to properly consider the dock statement
of the Appellant.
11) The Petitioner states that the following questions of law arise for adjudication by Your
Lordships Court in this Case:
a) Should the alleged “dying declaration” implicating the Petitioner which was led in
the course of the evidence of PW 01 (wife of the deceased) be disregarded, due to
the reason that the evidence of the PW 03- Consultant JMO confirms that the
deceased could not have spoken after he received the injuries to his neck ?
c) Has the Learned High Court Judge and Judges of the Court of Appeal failed to
properly consider the reasonable doubt which arises in the prosecution case itself?
d) Has the Learned High Court Judge and Judges of the Court of Appeal failed to
properly consider the dock statement of the Appellant?
a) Grant Special Leave to Appeal to Your Lordships Court against the order dated
05.08.2022 of the Court of Appeal in Case No: CA 105/21,
c) Set aside the conviction and death sentence imposed by the Learned High Court Judge of
Colombo in Case No: HC 55/20 dated 20.11.2021,
e) Grant such other and further reliefs that Your Lordship's Court shall seem meet.
PETITION
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Petitioner
V.
Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Respondent
1) The Petitioner states that he is a Director of “New Cars (Pvt) Ltd” which engages in the
business of importing cars to Sri Lanka from Japan.
(True copies of documents to in proof of the above are annexed herewith marked as
“P 1” and are pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
2) The Petitioner states that on 10.08.2022, a customer by the name of “Kumara Alwis” had
visited the showroom at No: 18, Ward Place, Borella and paid an advance of Rs.1 million
to the sales manager at the showroom by the name of Anthony Mark for the importation
of a “Tota Viz” vehicle manufactured in 2021 in Japan, the total price being Rs. 6
million.
3) The Petitioner states that according to the said agreement, the said vehicle was due to
arrive in Sri Lanka during the latter half of October 2022, however due to the “Fushima
earthquake” which unexpectedly affected Tokyo on the 28th of August 2022, it was not
possible for the vehicle to be brought to Sri Lanka as planned.
4) The Petitioner states that the above-mentioned customer “Kumara Alwis” came to the
showroom several times during the month of October and demanded for a refund of the
advance of Rs. 1 million. The Petitioner states that it was explained to “Kumara Alwis”
that due to the situation in Japan, it may not be possible to import the same type of
vehicle but that an older Indian manufactured vehicle of the same type can be imported
and sold at the same price.
5) The Petitioner states that the above mentioned “Kumara Alwis” who arrived at the
showroom on the 3rd of November 2022 attempted to violently assault the sales manager
Anthony Mark, demanding the refund of the advance of Rs. 1 million. The Petitioner
states that he intervened and tried to prevent this assault and that the said customer
“Kumara Alwis” threatened the Petitioner that he will take criminal legal action and have
the Petitioner arrested and remanded without bail for 01 year, using his political and
police contacts.
(A Compact Disk containing the relevant CCTV footage is marked as “P 3” and a true
copy of the affidavit of Anthony Mark pertaining to these events is marked as “P 4” and
are annexed as part and parcel of this application.)
6) The Petitioner states that during the month of November 2022, several phone calls were
received to the showroom where the above mentioned “Kumara Alwis” threatened that
he will have the Petitioner remanded and incarcerated if the Rs. 1 million advance is not
returned.
7) The Petitioner states that he is advised that “ Kumara Alwis” is attempting to make an
allegation that the Petitioner has committed the offence of “cheating” which is punishable
under section 403 of the Penal Code and which offence is a “non-bailable” criminal
offence.
8) The Petitioner states that he denies that he has committed any criminal offence and that
he is ready to come to an amicable settlement with “Kumara Alwis” concerning this
commercial dispute.
9) The Petitioner states that considering the behavior and threats made by “Kumara Alwis”
his only aim is to have the Petitioner arrested and remanded and to punish and harass the
Petitioner.
(True copies of the marriage certificate of the Petitioner and birth certificated of the two
children are annexed herewith marked as “P 5”, “P 6” and “P 7” respectively and are
pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
11) The Petitioner states that he is an insulin dependent diabetes patient, and that if he is
incarcerated, it would adversely affect his health.
12) The Petitioner states that he undertakes to assist in any criminal investigation or judicial
proceeding against him and appear before Court as and when required.
13) The Petitioner states when the above material is considered in its totality, suitable
grounds have been established to grant Anticipatory Bail to the Petitioner.
14) The Petitioner states that he has not invoked the jurisdiction of this Court or any other
Court concerning this matter.
15) The Petitioner states that if inadvertently any document necessary for the determination
of this application has not been submitted, he may be permitted to submit such document
with the permission of Court before the hearing of this application.
Whereas the Petitioner pleads that Your Honour’s Court be pleased to:
PETITION
Complainant
Suspect
Kanthi Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Petitioner
V.
1) Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Complainant-Respondent
2nd Respondent
And
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Suspect
(Presently in Colombo remand Prison)
TO: THE HONORABLE HIGH COURT JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF THE
WESTERN PROVINCE HOLDEN IN COLOMBO
The Petitioner abovenamed appearing by his Attorney –at-Law Kamal Perera,states as follows in
his Petition:
1) The Petitioner states that she is the wife of Ajith Silva, the suspect abovenamed and that
she is a mother of two children aged 02 and 05.
(A true copy of the Marriage Certificate of the Petitioner and the Birth Certificates of her
two children are annexed herewith marked as “P 1”, “P2” and “P 3” respectively and
are pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
2) The Petitioner states that her husband is the sole breadwinner of the family and until his
arrest and incarceration, he was supporting the family as a three-wheeler driver.
3) The Petitioner states that on the 5th of October 2022, her brother Sunil Gamini arrived at
their house at about 7pm and thereafter, her brother and her husband started consuming
arrack.
4) The Petitioner states that at about 9pm, she asked her husband and brother to come
inside the house and have their dinner. While they were having dinner, an argument arose
concerning a loan which the Petitioner’s brother had given the Petitioner’s husband. The
argument became more aggressive, and the Petitioner’s brother threw his plate towards
the Petitioner’s husband who managed to catch the place and throw it back towards the
Petitioner’s brother.
6) The Petitioner states that Police officers from the Borella Police Station recorded
statements from several witnesses and after a statement was recorded from her husband,
at about 10pm on the same night, they arrested the Petitioner’s husband without giving a
reason for the arrest.
7) The Petitioner states that on the following day, her husband was produced to the
Colombo Magistrate Court No: 01 under Case No: B. 2323/22/1 and was further
remanded. The Petitioner was surprised to be informed that her husband had been
arrested on an allegation or murder.
(The certified copy of the B report dated 06.10.2022 is annexed herewith marked as “P4”
and is pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
8) The Petitioner states that after the post-mortem inquiry and the inquest proceedings, it
was revealed that the cause of death was a ‘heat attack’ although the deceased had a
minor injury on his face due to the impact of the plate which struck his face.
(A certified copy of the inquest proceedings and the Post-mortem report are annexed
herewith marked as “P 5” and “P 6” and are pleaded as part and parcel of this
application.)
9) The Petitioner states that the Police investigations have been concluded and that the
matter has been referred to the Hon. Attorney General for advice on further legal action
and that her husband remains incarcerated in the meantime.
10) The Petitioner states that her husband vehemently rejects the allegation of murder.
11) The Petitioner states that her husband suffered a heart attack on the 8th of July 2022, and
that he is continuously taking medication for his heart disease and that the incarceration
of her husband may cause a danger to the life of her husband.
(A true copy of the Diagnostic Card issued by the National Hospital of Sri Lanka,
concerning the heart ailment of the Petitioner’s husband is annexed herewith marked as
“P7” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
12) The Petitioner states that Your Honour’s Court may consider enlarging the Petitioner’s
husband on bail, considering that the following circumstances:
b) The incarceration of the suspect who is a heart patient, may cause a danger to his
health.
c) The suspect is the sole breadwinner of his family, and due to his incarceration, the
Petitioner and his two children are left destitute.
e) There are no grounds under section 14 of the Bail Act No: 30 of 1997 to reject bail.
13) The Petitioner states that the jurisdiction of Your Honour’s Court has net been previously
invoked in respect of this matter.
14) If inadvertently the Petitioner has failed to include a document which is necessary for the
determination of this Bail Application, the Petitioner seeks the permission of Your
Honour’s Court, to tender such documents to Your Honour’s Court, with notice to the
Respondents, before the hearing of this matter.
WHEREFORE the Petitioner prays that Y our Honour’s Court be pleased to:
b) Enlarge the husband of the Petitioner on Bail, on conditions that may be acceptable to
Y our Honour’s Court,
c) Grant such other and further relief as may seem meet to Y our Honour’s Court.
PETITION
Complainant
2) Kumar Jayaratne
No: 15, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Suspects
Kanthi Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Petitioner
V.
Complainant-Respondent
2nd Respondent
And
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
1st Suspect
(Presently in Colombo remand Prison)
TO: THE HONORABLE HIGH COURT JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF THE
WESTERN PROVINCE HOLDEN IN COLOMBO
The Petitioner abovenamed appearing by his Attorney -at-Law Kamal Perera, states as follows in
his Petition:
1) The Petitioner states that she is the wife of Ajith Silva, the suspect abovenamed and that
she is a mother of two children aged 02 and 05.
(A true copy of the Marriage Certificate of the Petitioner and the Birth Certificates of her
two children are annexed herewith marked as “ P 1”, “P2” and “P 3” respectively and
are pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
2) The Petitioner states that her husband is the sole breadwinner of the family and until his
arrest and incarceration, he was supporting the family as a three-wheeler driver.
3) The Petitioner states that on the 5th of October 2022, her husband left home in his three-
wheeler at about 7 am, for a hire but did not return in the evening as usual and his mobile
phone was not functioning.
5) The Petitioner states that she immediately went to the Borella Police Station, at about
8.30pm and saw that her husband was kept in a cell but she was not permitted to speak
with her husband.
6) The Petitioner states that a Police Officer informed her that her husband had been
arrested while carrying a packet of heroin in his trouser pocket and that he will be
produced before Court on the following day.
7) The Petitioner states that on the 6th of October 2022, her husband was produced to the
Colombo Magistrate Court No: 01 under Case No: B. 2323/22/1 and was further
remanded. Another individual who was referred to as the 2nd suspect, was also produced
before Court and remanded along with the Petitioner’s husband.
(A complete certified copy of the case record of Colombo Magistrate Court Case No: B.
2323/22/1, is annexed herewith marked as “P 4” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this
application)
8) The Petitioner states that according to the B Report dated 06.10.2022, filed by the
Complainant-Respondent, it was the 2nd suspect (Kumar Jayaratne) who was the
passenger of the three-wheeler, who had allegedly been in possession of 05 grams of
heroin. The husband of the Petitioner, named as the 1 st suspect had only been the driver of
the three-wheeler.
(The certified copy of the B report dated 06.10.2022 is annexed herewith marked as “P 5”
and is pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
9) The Petitioner states that her husband was merely going on a three-wheeler hire and had
no knowledge of the contents of the pockets of the passenger of the three-wheeler, at the
time he was arrested on 05.10.2022.
10) The Petitioner states that her husband suffered a heart attack on the 8th of July 2022, and
that he is continuously taking medication for his heart disease and that the incarceration
of her husband may cause a danger to the life of her husband.
(A true copy of the Diagnostic Card issued by the National Hospital of Sri Lanka,
concerning the heart ailment of the Petitioner’s husband is annexed herewith marked as
“P 6” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
a) The material reported to Court by the Complainant-Respondent does not disclose that
the 1st suspect was aware that the 2nd suspect was hiding narcotics in hist rouser
pocket.
b) The incarceration of the 1st suspect who is a heart patient, may cause a danger to the
health of the 1st suspect.
c) The 1st suspect is the sole breadwinner of his family, and due to his incarceration, the
Petitioner and his two children are left destitute.
12) The Petitioner states that the jurisdiction of Your Honour’s Court has net been previously
invoked in respect of this matter.
13) If inadvertently the Petitioner has failed to include a document which is necessary for the
determination of this Bail Application, the Petitioner seeks the permission of Your
Honour’s Court, to tender such documents to Your Honour’s Court, with notice to the
Respondents, before the hearing of this matter.
WHEREFORE the Petitioner prays that Y our Honour’s Court be pleased to:
b) Enlarge the husband of the Petitioner (1st suspect) on Bail, on conditions that may be
acceptable to Your Honour’s Court,
c) Grant such other and further relief as may seem meet to Y our Honour’s Court.
PETITION
Complainant
Suspect
Kanthi Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Petitioner
V.
1) Officer-in-Charge
Police Station
Borella.
Complainant-Respondent
2nd Respondent
And
Ajith Silva
No: 10, Baseline Road,
Colombo 08.
Suspect
(Presently in Colombo remand Prison)
1) The Petitioner states that she is the wife of Ajith Silva, the suspect abovenamed and that
she is a mother of two children aged 02 and 05.
(A true copy of the Marriage Certificate of the Petitioner and the Birth Certificates of her
two children are annexed herewith marked as “P 1”, “P2” and “P 3” respectively and are
pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
2) The Petitioner states that her husband is the sole breadwinner of the family and until his
arrest and incarceration, he was supporting the family as a three-wheeler driver.
3) The Petitioner states that her husband is the Accused in Colombo Magistrate Court Case
No: 4567/22/1 and the charge against him is that he had committed an offence punishable
under section 314 of the Penal Code by slapping a person by the name of Ananda
Kulasinghe.
(A complete certified copy of the case record of Colombo Magistrate Court Case No:
4567/22/1 is annexed herewith marked as “ P 4” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this
application)
5) The Petitioner states that as the Petitioner and her husband, exited the Court premises
after the trial on 10.10.2022, at about 3.30pm, the virtual-complainant in Colombo
Magistrate Court Case No: 4567/22/1, walked towards them and stated as follows: “I
will make sure you end up behind bars !” . The Petitioner states that her husband replied
stating:“ we will see about that!” and they both walked away and returned home.
6) The Petitioner states that on the following day (11.10.2022), her husband was informed
by an officer of the Borella Police Station to meet the Officer-in-Charge and when he
went there at about 2pm, he was arrested on an allegation that he had threatened the
virtual-complainant of Colombo Magistrate Court Case No: 4567/22/1, on 10.10.2022
after the hearing of the trial.
7) The Petitioner states that her husband was kept incarcerated overnight at the Police
Station and was produced on the following day (12.10.2022) before the Magistrate under
Case No: B. 8585/22/1 and remanded further on the basis that he had allegedly
committed an offence under section 8 (1)(a) of the Assistance to and Protection of
Victims of Crime and Witness Act No: 04 of 2015 and therefore the Magistrate Court
does not have the jurisdiction to consider bail.
(A complete certified copy of the case record of Colombo Magistrate Court Case No: B.
8585/22/1 is annexed herewith marked as “ P5” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this
application)
8) The Petitioner states that her husband vehemently denies the above allegation and that the
Petitioner was present with her husband when an exchange of words took place after the
Magistrate Court trial on 10.10.2022 between her husband and the virtual-complainant,
and that no offence in terms of the provisions of the Assistance to and Protection of
Victims of Crime and Witness Act No: 04 of 2015 was committed by her husband.
9) The Petitioner states that her husband suffered a heart attack on the 8th of July 2022, and
that he is continuously taking medication for his heart disease and that the incarceration
of her husband may cause a danger to the life of her husband.
(A true copy of the Diagnostic Card issued by the National Hospital of Sri Lanka,
concerning the heart ailment of the Petitioner‟s husband is annexed herewith marked as
“P 6” and is pleaded as part and parcel of this application)
a) The material reported to Court by the Complainant-Respondent does not disclose that
the 1st suspect was aware that the 2nd suspect was hiding narcotics in his trouser
pocket.
b) The incarceration of the suspect who is a heart patient, may cause a danger to the
health of the suspect.
c) The suspect is the sole breadwinner of his family, and due to his incarceration, the
Petitioner and his two children are left destitute.
11) The Petitioner states that the jurisdiction of Your Lordship’s Court has not been
previously invoked in respect of this matter.
12) If inadvertently the Petitioner has failed to include a document which is necessary for the
determination of this Bail Application, the Petitioner seeks the permission of Your
Lordship’s Court, to tender such documents to Your Lordship’s Court, with notice to the
Respondents, before the hearing of this matter.
WHEREFORE the Petitioner prays that Your Lordship’s Court be pleased to:
b) Enlarge the husband of the Petitioner on Bail, on conditions that may be acceptable to
Y our Lordship’s Court,
c) Grant such other and further relief as may seem meet to Y our Lordship’s Court.