0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views6 pages

ACC213 WEEK67 ULOa

study purposes
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views6 pages

ACC213 WEEK67 ULOa

study purposes
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Department of Accounting Education

Mabini Street, Tagum City


Davao del Norte
Telefax: (084) 655-9591, Local 116

Big Picture
Week 6&7: Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO): At the end of the unit, you are expected
to:
a. explain the concept of variable and absorption costing.
b. describe the concept and importance ofcost-volume-profit relationship in the
operation of the business.

Big Picture in Focus: ULOa. explain the concept of variable and


absorption costing

Metalanguage
In this section, the most essential terms relevant to the topic and to demonstrate ULOa
will be operationally defined to establish a common frame of reference as to how the
texts work in your chosen field or career.
1. Absorption costing – (also known as full costing) is an approach to product
costing that assigns all manufacturing costs (direct materials, direct labor and
all factory overhead) to the items produced. Thus, inventoriable cost include all
the cost elements of production; and period include all non-manufacturing
costs. This method is typically used for external income statement reporting.

2. Variable costing – (also known as direct costing) is an approach to product


costing that assigns only variable manufacturing costs (direct materials, direct
labor and variable factory overhead) to the items produced. Thus, inventoriable
cost are limited to the variable manufacturing costs; and period include all fixed
costs and variable non-manufacturing costs. This method is typically used for
internal income statement reporting.

Please proceed immediately to the “Essential Knowledge”.

Essential Knowledge

This portion discusses the cost accumulation and presentation techniques to product
costing. Cost accumulation and presentation procedures are accomplished using one
of two methods: absorption costing or variable costing. Each method uses the same
basic data, but structures and processes the data differently.

1. Product Cost Components

Absorption Costing Variable Costing


Direct materials Direct materials
+ Direct labor + Direct labor
+ Variable FOH + Variable FOH
+ Fixed FOH -
Product Cost Product Cost
Department of Accounting Education
Mabini Street, Tagum City
Davao del Norte
Telefax: (084) 655-9591, Local 116

2. Distinction between Period costs and Product costs

Period Cost Product Cost


1. Cost that is charged against 1. Cost that is included in the
current revenue during a time computation of product cost that
period regardless of the is apportioned between the sold
difference between production and unsold units.
and sales volumes.
2. Does not form part of the cost of 2. An inventoriable cost. The portion
inventory. of the cost that has been allocated
to the unsold units becomes part
of the cost of inventory.
3. Reduces income for the current 3. Reduces current income by the
period by its full amount. portion allocated to the sold units;
the portion allocated to unsold
units is treated as an asset, being
part of the cost of inventory.

3. Principal differences between Absorption and Variable Costing Method

Absorption Costing Variable Costing


1. Cost segregation Seldom segregates costs Costs are segregated into
into variable and fixed variable and fixed
costs
2. Cost of inventory Cost of inventory includes Cost of inventory includes
all the manufacturing only the variable
costs: materials, labor, manufacturing costs:
variable factory overhead, materials, labor, and
and fixed factory overhead variable factory overhead
3. Treatment of fixed Fixed factory overhead is Fixed factory overhead is
factory overhead treated as product cost treated as period cost
4. Income Statement Distinguishes between Distinguishes between
production and other variable and fixd costs.
costs. Sales XX
Sales XX -Variable costs XX
-COGS (production XX Contr. margin XX
costs) -Fixed costs XX
Gross Profit XX Profit XX
-S&A costs XX
Profit XX

5. Net Income Net income between the two methods may differ from
each other because of the difference in the amount of
fixed overhead costs recognized as expense during
an accounting period. This is due to variations
between sales and production. In the long run,
however, both methods give substantially the same
Department of Accounting Education
Mabini Street, Tagum City
Davao del Norte
Telefax: (084) 655-9591, Local 116

results since sales cannot continuously exceed


production, nor production can continually exceed
sales.

4. Difference in Net Income under Absorption and Variable Costing

Variable and absorption costing methods of accounting for fixed manufacturing


overhead result in different levels of net income in most cases. The differences are
timing differences, i.e., when to recognize the fixed manufacturing overhead as an
expense. In variable costing, it is expensed during the period when the fixed
manufacturing overhead is incurred, while in absorption costing, it is expensed in the
period when the units to which such fixed manufacturing overhead are sold.

▪ Production equals Sales


When production is equals to sales, there is no change in inventory.
Fixed overhead expensed under absorption costing equals fixed
overhead expensed under variable costing. Therefore, absorption
costing income equals variable costing income.

▪ Production is greater than Sales


When production is greater than sales, there is an increase in inventory.
Fixed overhead expensed under absorption costing is less than fixed
overhead expensed under variable costing. Therefore, absorption
costing income is greater than variable costing income.

▪ Production is less than Sales


When production is less than sales, there is an decrease in inventory.
Fixed overhead expensed under absorption costing is greater than fixed
overhead expensed under variable costing. Therefore, absorption
costing income is less than variable costing income.

5. Reconciliation of Absorption and Variable Costing Income Figures

Absorption costing income P XX


Add: Fixed overhead in the beginning inventory XX
Total XX
Less: Fixed overhead in the ending inventory XX
Variable costing income P XX

6. Accounting for Difference in Income


Change in inventory (production less sales) P XX
Multiple by: FOH cost per unit XX
Difference in income P XX
Department of Accounting Education
Mabini Street, Tagum City
Davao del Norte
Telefax: (084) 655-9591, Local 116

7. Arguments for the use of Variable costing


1) Variable costing reports are simpler and more understandable.
2) Data needed for break-even and cost-volume-profit analyses ae readily
available.
3) The problems involved in allocating fixed costs are eliminated.
4) Variable costing is more compatible with standard cost accounting system.
5) Variable costing reports provide useful information for pricing decisions and
other decision – making problems encountered by management.

8. Arguments against Variable costing


1) Segregation of costs into fixed and variable might be difficult, particular in the
case of mixed costs.
2) The matching principle is violated by using variable costing which excludes
fixed overhead from product costs and charges the same to period costs
regardless of production and sales.
3) With variable costing, inventory costs and other elated accounts, such as
working capital, current ratio, and acid test ratio are understated because of the
exclusion of fixed overhead in the computation of product cost.

Sample problem:
During the year 2020, Clove Corporation’s production was equal to its normal capacity
of 1,000 units. It sold 900 units at a price of P50 per unit.

The following costs were incurred during the year:


Total Cost Cost per unit
Direct materials P 12,000 P12
Direct labor 10,000 10
Variable factory overhead 8,000 8
Fixed factory overhead 6,000 6
Variable selling & administrative 4,500 5*
Fixed selling & administrative 3,000 3

*variable selling &adm. cost per unit = P4,500 ÷ 900 = P5.

I. Product cost per unit


Product cost per unit
Absorption Costing Variable Costing
Direct materials P 12 P 12
Direct labor 10 10
Variable factory overhead 8 8
Fixed factory overhead 6 -
Product cost per unit P 36 P 30
Department of Accounting Education
Mabini Street, Tagum City
Davao del Norte
Telefax: (084) 655-9591, Local 116

II. Income under absorption costing


Sales (900 units x P50) P 45,000
Less: Cost of goods sold (900 units x P36) 32,400
Gross Profit 12,600
Less: selling & administrative expenses
Variable (900 x P5) P 4,500
Fixed 3,000 7,500
Income P 5,100

III. Income under variable costing


Sales (900 units x P50) P 45,000
Less: Variable costs
Cost of goods sold (900 x P30) P 27,000
selling & administrative expenses 4,500 31,500
Contribution Margin 13,500
Less: Fixed costs
Factory overhead 6,000
selling & administrative expenses 3,000 9,000
Income P 4,500

IV. Computation of and accounting for the difference in income


Absorption costing income P5,100
Variable costing income 4,500
Difference in income P 600

Self-help
You can also refer to the sources below to help you further understand the
lesson:
Cabrera, M. E. (2017). Management Accounting: Concepts and Application. Manila:
GIC Enterprises & Co., Inc.

De Leon, E.D., & De Leon N.D. (2016). Cost accounting. Manila: IC Enterprises &
Co., Inc.

Raiborn, C. A., & Kinney, M.R. (2014). Cost accounting (2014 second edition).
Philippines Hixes Press, Inc.
Department of Accounting Education
Mabini Street, Tagum City
Davao del Norte
Telefax: (084) 655-9591, Local 116

Let’s Analyze!
The Casper Company is comparing its present absorption costing practices with direct
costing methods. An examination of its records produced the following information:
Maximum plant capacity 40,000 units
Normal capacity 36,000 units
Fixed factory overhead P 54,000
Fixed marketing and administrative expense P 20,000
Sales price per unit P 10
Standard variable manufacturing cost per unit P4
Variable marketing expense per unit sold P1

For the year, the following data are available:


Budgeted production 36,000 units
Actual production 30,000 units
Sales 28,000 units
Finished goods inventory, beginning P 1,000
Unfavorable variances from standard variable P 5,000
manufacturing costs

All variances are written off directly at year-end as an adjustment in Cost of Goods
Sold.

Required:
1) Prepare the income statement under the direct costing method.
2) Prepare the income statement under the absorption costing method.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy