Reduction of Order
Reduction of Order
2 REDUCTION OF ORDER
Integration yields
ln 𝑤 + 2 ln 𝑦1 = − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥 + ln 𝑐
ln|𝑤𝑦12 | = − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥 + ln 𝑐 = ln 𝑒 − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥 + ln 𝑐 = ln 𝑐 𝑒 − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥
Or
𝑤𝑦12 = 𝑐 𝑒 − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥
Or
𝑐 𝑒 − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥
𝑤=
𝑦12
But 𝑤 = 𝑢′(𝑥), so we have
𝑐 𝑒 − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥
𝑤 = 𝑢′ (𝑥) =
𝑦12
𝑒 − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥
𝑦2 (𝑥) = 𝑦1 (𝑥) ∫ 𝑑𝑥. (5)
𝑦12
It makes a good review of differentiation to verify that the function 𝑦2 (𝑥) defined in (5)
satisfies equation(2) and that 𝑦1 and 𝑦2 are linearly independent on any interval on which
𝑦1 (𝑥) is not zero.
EXAMPLE 1: Find the general solution to
𝑦 ′′ + 4𝑦 ′ + 4𝑦 = 0 (1)
Given that 𝑦1 (𝑥 ) = 𝑒 −2𝑥 is a solution.
SOLUTION: Let
𝑦2 = 𝑢(𝑥 )𝑦1 (𝑥 ) = 𝑢(𝑥 )𝑒 −2𝑥
be the solution of (1), then it must satisfies (1).
𝑦′2 = 𝑢′ 𝑒 −2𝑥 − 2 𝑢 𝑒 −2𝑥
𝑦′′2 = 𝑢′′ 𝑒 −2𝑥 − 4𝑢′ 𝑒 −2𝑥 + 4 𝑢 𝑒 −2𝑥
Substituting the values of 𝑦2′ and 𝑦′′2 in (1).
𝑦2′′ + 4𝑦2′ + 4𝑦2 = (𝑢′′ 𝑒 −2𝑥 − 4𝑢′ 𝑒 −2𝑥 + 4 𝑢 𝑒 −2𝑥 ) + 4(𝑢′ 𝑒 −2𝑥 −
2 𝑢 𝑒 −2𝑥 ) + 4(𝑢(𝑥 )𝑒 −2𝑥 ) = 0
After simplification, we have
𝑢′′ (𝑥 )𝑒 −2𝑥 = 0
This tells us either 𝑢′′ (𝑥 ) = 0 or 𝑒 −2𝑥 = 0.
But 𝑒 −2𝑥 ≠ 0, so 𝑢′′ (𝑥 ) = 0
Integration yields
𝑢′ (𝑥 ) = 𝑐
Again integrating, we have
𝑢(𝑥 ) = 𝑐 𝑥 + 𝑑
If we take 𝑐 = 1 and 𝑑 = 0, we have
𝑢(𝑥 ) = 𝑥
So we have obtained the second solution as 𝑦2 = 𝑢(𝑥 )𝑒 −2𝑥 = 𝑥𝑒 −2𝑥 .
Method II. We can also use the formula derived in (5) as
𝑒 − ∫ 𝑃 𝑑𝑥
𝑦2 (𝑥) = 𝑦1 (𝑥) ∫ 𝑑𝑥
𝑦12
𝑒 − ∫ 4 𝑑𝑥 𝑒 −4𝑥
= 𝑒 −2𝑥 ∫ 𝑑𝑥 = 𝑒 −2𝑥 ∫ 𝑑𝑥 = 𝑒 −2𝑥 ∫ 1 𝑑𝑥 = 𝑥𝑒 −2𝑥 .
𝑒 −4𝑥 𝑒 −4𝑥
To see whether they linearly independent or not, we use Wronskian of the two
function 𝑦1 (𝑥 ) = 𝑒 −2𝑥 and 𝑦2 = 𝑥𝑒 −2𝑥 .
𝑦1 𝑦2 𝑒 −2𝑥 𝑥𝑒 −2𝑥 −4𝑥
𝑊 = |𝑦 ′ 𝑦2′ | = | −2𝑥 | = 𝑒 ≠ 0.
1 −2𝑒 −2𝑥
𝑒 −2𝑥
− 2𝑥𝑒
So 𝑦1 and 𝑦2 are linearly independent. Hence the general solution is
𝑦 = 𝑐1 𝑦1 + 𝑐2 𝑦2 = 𝑐1 𝑒 −2𝑥 + 𝑐2 𝑥𝑒 −2𝑥 .
Exercise 4.2
In Problems 1–16 the indicated function 𝑦1 (𝑥) is a solution of the given DE. Use
reduction of order or formula (7) as instructed, to find the 2nd solution 𝑦2 (𝑥).