Ethical Dilemma
Ethical Dilemma
Ethical Dilemma
An ethical dilemma is a situation in which a person or group must choose between two or more
conflicting moral principles, where every option involves some ethical compromise. In such
dilemmas, there is no clear "right" or "wrong" choice, and any decision made may violate one
ethical principle to uphold another. Ethical dilemmas often arise in areas like healthcare, law,
business, and personal life, requiring individuals to navigate complex decisions that may affect
others.
1. Medical Ethics:
o End-of-Life Decisions: Healthcare providers may encounter ethical dilemmas
when dealing with terminally ill patients. For example, a patient may wish to
discontinue life-sustaining treatment, raising questions about the balance between
respecting the patient’s autonomy and the ethical principle of non-maleficence
(avoiding harm).
o Resource Allocation: During situations like pandemics or natural disasters,
healthcare providers may have to decide how to allocate limited resources (e.g.,
ventilators, ICU beds). This creates a dilemma between providing care to the most
critically ill patients and ensuring fairness (justice) in the distribution of resources.
2. Business Ethics:
o Whistleblowing: An employee might face an ethical dilemma when they discover
unethical behavior or illegal activities within their company. Reporting the issue
(whistleblowing) may protect the public or consumers but could also lead to
personal and professional consequences, such as retaliation from colleagues or
superiors.
o Profit vs. Social Responsibility: Business leaders may encounter ethical
dilemmas when deciding between maximizing profits and fulfilling their
corporate social responsibilities. For example, a company might need to choose
between using cheaper materials that could harm the environment and
maintaining higher costs for eco-friendly alternatives.
3. Legal Ethics:
o Confidentiality vs. Public Safety: Lawyers may face dilemmas related to client
confidentiality. For instance, a defense attorney might learn that their client
intends to commit a serious crime. The lawyer is ethically bound to maintain
confidentiality but also has a responsibility to prevent harm to others.
o Defending the Guilty: A defense attorney may face a dilemma when they know
or strongly suspect that their client is guilty of a serious crime but are ethically
obligated to provide the best defense possible.
4. Personal Ethical Dilemmas:
o Honesty vs. Protecting Feelings: In personal relationships, people may face
dilemmas about whether to be completely honest or to protect the feelings of
others. For instance, telling a friend a difficult truth might strain the relationship,
while keeping silent could lead to long-term harm or resentment.
o Family Obligations vs. Personal Freedom: Many people experience ethical
dilemmas related to balancing family responsibilities with personal goals and
aspirations. For example, caring for an elderly relative may conflict with pursuing
career opportunities, leading to difficult decisions about prioritizing family or
personal growth.
1. Deontological Ethics: This approach, based on the work of philosopher Immanuel Kant,
emphasizes following moral rules or duties, regardless of the outcome. In this view,
certain actions are intrinsically right or wrong, and ethical decision-making involves
adhering to these rules. For example, a healthcare provider might prioritize the duty to
preserve life over the patient’s choice to refuse treatment.
2. Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism, associated with philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John
Stuart Mill, is a consequentialist approach that focuses on producing the greatest good for
the greatest number of people. In ethical dilemmas, utilitarianism emphasizes choosing
the option that maximizes overall well-being or minimizes harm, even if it involves
making sacrifices for individuals.
3. Virtue Ethics: This approach, rooted in Aristotelian philosophy, emphasizes the
character and intentions of the decision-maker rather than focusing solely on rules or
consequences. Virtue ethics encourages individuals to act in ways that reflect moral
virtues, such as compassion, honesty, and courage, to resolve dilemmas.
4. Principlism: In healthcare, principlism is a common ethical framework that involves
applying four primary principles—autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice
—to resolve dilemmas. This approach is often used by bioethics committees to analyze
complex ethical situations and make recommendations that respect both patient rights and
professional obligations.
1. Identify the Ethical Issues: Clearly define the ethical principles that are in conflict and
the values that are at stake in the situation. Recognizing all stakeholders involved is
crucial.
2. Gather Information: Collect relevant facts about the situation, including medical details,
legal considerations, cultural factors, and the perspectives of everyone involved.
3. Evaluate Options: Consider the potential consequences of each possible action,
including the impact on all parties. Apply ethical theories (deontology, utilitarianism,
etc.) to analyze the options.
4. Make a Decision: After weighing the options, choose the course of action that aligns best
with the prioritized ethical principles and the specific context of the dilemma.
5. Implement and Reflect: Carry out the decision and evaluate its outcomes. Reflect on the
process and consider what could be learned from the experience for future ethical
challenges.
Conclusion
Ethical dilemmas present complex challenges that require individuals to balance competing
values and principles. Whether in healthcare, business, law, or personal life, these situations
demand careful consideration, critical thinking, and moral judgment to find solutions that are
both ethical and practical. While there may be no perfect resolution, ethical frameworks and
theories provide guidance to help navigate these difficult decisions.