Make It Stick
Make It Stick
Make It Stick
Learning is a lifelong process of building knowledge, experiences, and skills, and then storing them in
your memory to apply to problems you encounter. But as natural as it may seem, you have to
learn how to learn.
Most people hold false beliefs about learning that lead them to use ineffective study methods, such as
rereading and drilling the same skill over and over. These ineffective strategies and learning myths are
ingrained in our educational system and perpetuated by teachers, coaches, parents, and peers.
By contrast, the most effective learning strategies are often counterintuitive. That’s why this book
teaches you how to learn and study based on data about how your brain comprehends and retains
information.
The book’s principles and prescriptions draw from a vast number of research studies. Two of the
authors, cognitive scientists Henry Roediger and Mark McDaniel, collaborated with other researchers on
a 10-year study about how to apply cognitive psychology to improve learning practices, and a number of
their findings are included in the book.
If you want to improve your learning, you must first define your goals for learning and studying. This
book doesn’t help you simply pass the midterm—it teaches you how to absorb and master new
information.
1. Comprehension: You want to gain a deep understanding of the underlying principle in order to
understand how it applies to different situations.
2. Retention: You need to remember the information when a problem or situation calls for it, and
when you get a chance to build upon it with more advanced knowledge.
When you’re learning something new, instead of simply memorizing the information from your textbook
or lecture notes, you’ll gain a more meaningful understanding if you identify the rules, which are the
underlying principles that will guide you when you call on this knowledge to solve real-world
problems. In order to extract the main principles, you need to be able to weed out extraneous
information.
1) Examining multiple examples at once—instead of one at a time—in order to more clearly see the
common thread and extract the underlying principles.
For instance, if you want to learn more about butterflies, instead of examing species one at a
time, study a variety of butterfly species at once and note their similarities and differences.
2) Examining two different problems at once, in hopes of finding similarities or differences that
illuminate the rules and help you reach each problem’s solution.
For instance, when solving two unrelated problems, such as 1) how to get a large group of
firefighters across a river without breaking its fragile bridges and 2) how to treat a tumor
without damaging the healthy tissue surrounding it, compare the problems. The similarities (a
high volume of something needs to reach a target, but sending it all at once will cause damage)
might lead to solutions (direct smaller forces at the target through different passages—multiple
bridges or different angles of radiation—at the same time).
Once you recognize the rules, connect those principles with prior relevant knowledge. This process—
called structure building—creates context, which deepens your understanding.
Structures help you create mental models, which bring together interrelated concepts or skills into one
fluid skillset. For example, driving a car requires knowledge of traffic laws as well as motor skills to push
the brake pedal and turn the wheel with the right amount of force. At first, it feels like you’re juggling
several skills at once, but experience merges them all into a mental model that enables you to drive
without consciously thinking about each individual action.
Mental models are essential for achieving mastery—such as the driver who appears to react
instantaneously when another car abruptly cuts into her lane or suddenly brakes right in front of
her. The more mental models you have, the better prepared you are to navigate any
situation. Additionally, practicing your mental models in a variety of contexts improves your ability to
apply them in different situations. For example, if you’re skilled at driving a car in various road, weather,
and environmental conditions, you’ll be better able to apply those skills to driving a bus or an RV.
Knowing a skill is one thing—but remembering it when a situation calls for it is what counts. And the
better you remember something, the more reflexively you can recall that information when you need it.
Many people try to burn information into their memories by rereading, but this approach only commits
the information to their short-term memories, making it a waste of time in the long run. Instead, the
most effective way to improve retention of new information is through retrieval practice, which is any
exercise that requires you to recall what you’ve learned. You can practice retrieval with classroom
quizzes, flashcards, self-testing, and reflection, when you assess how you approached a particular
problem and how you can improve next time.
1) More difficult retrieval leads to better retention. The harder your brain has to work to retrieve the
information, the more firmly it cements it in your memory.
One way to create this “desirable difficulty” is by using generation, which requires you to generate the
answer from memory (for example, using flashcards or short-answer questions instead of multiple-
choice questions). Another way is to delay your retrieval practice long enough that your memory has
gotten a little fuzzy and your brain has to work harder to retrieve the information.
2) Frequent testing improves retention. Regular testing deepens your comprehension, which improves
your ability to apply the knowledge in different contexts. And the longer you continue regular testing—
even after you feel that you’ve mastered the skill—the longer-lasting your retention will be.
The most effective testing schedule is to build in a slight delay before the first test, and then follow up
with regular testing at various intervals.
3) Corrective feedback is crucial to prevent students from remembering the wrong answer, and to
reinforce the correct information.
Corrective feedback is most effective when it’s slightly delayed, because immediate feedback can
become a crutch in learning and mastering the material. Immediate feedback is like learning to ride a
bike with training wheels—the correction is so automatic that you begin to rely on that support, which
inhibits you from truly learning and mastering the skill.
Spaced Practice
As we mentioned, spacing out your retrieval practice creates desirable difficulties that improve your
retention. Instead of focusing on one skill or topic at a time—a strategy called massed practice—spaced
practice gives your brain the time it needs to strengthen new knowledge and store it in your long-term
memory through a process called consolidation.
1) Interleaved practice mixes your practice among multiple related topics or skills. For example, if you're
learning how to calculate volumes of different geometric shapes, mix up the problems—doing a sphere
problem, then a cube problem, then another sphere problem—instead of grouping your practice
problems by shape. Not only does interleaving space your practice, but it also helps you make mental
connections to the other subjects you mix in.
The key to interleaving is to switch to the next skill or concept before you’ve finished practicing one. It
feels frustrating to switch gears before you’re ready, but this method improves your long-term
retention.
2) Varied practice involves practicing a skill in different contexts. This strategy strengthens your
understanding of the underlying principles and your ability to apply that skill in a variety of situations, as
in the example of improving your driving skills by practicing in various weather conditions.
In order to expand your learning, you need to know what you know, what you don’t know, and what you
need to work on. But people are poor judges of their own knowledge and abilities, and those
miscalculations can inhibit learning.
There are several reasons humans struggle to accurately gauge their own competencies:
Perceptual illusions distort your senses and make you misinterpret images, sounds, or other
sensations. For example, pilots can encounter optical illusions or, in extreme situations, illusions
that make them think the plane is flying level when it’s actually tilted.
Cognitive biases are caused by systematic problems with your way of thinking that impact your
judgment and decision making. For example, the bandwagon effect is a cognitive bias that
makes people more likely to think or do something if other people think or do it.
A “hunger for narrative”—the natural desire to create narratives that explain why things are the
way they are—leads people to misinterpret situations. Narratives are a stronger influence than
objective facts, yet people fail to recognize or vastly underestimate this influence. For example,
if your parents made a lot of money from running their own business, you may extoll the
concept of pulling yourself up by your bootstraps and climbing the socioeconomic ladder, and
you may have a hard time understanding anyone’s argument for social welfare programs.
Distorted memories lead people to color their memories with false details, and even claim to
remember something that never happened. The human memory is inherently moldable, lending
itself to distortions and false memories. For example, if a witness to a crime views photos of
suspects and then subsequently looks at a lineup, she’s more likely to falsely accuse someone in
the lineup if she’s already seen his photo.
Misdiagnosing a problem and failing to recognize that it requires a different approach than what
your mental model dictates. For example, brain surgeons typically have to perform surgery
slowly and steadily, but if certain conditions create pressure in the brain, their patients’ lives
depend on them doing the opposite and working as quickly as possible.
Oblivious incompetence makes people overestimate their own abilities and underestimate their
need to improve.
When these factors impede your ability to accurately gauge your knowledge and ability, you don’t know
where your gaps in knowledge are. You’re less likely to spend the extra time practicing the things you
need to work on, and when a real-life situation calls for that knowledge, you fall flat.
However, you can improve your gauge of your own competence. Use these learning strategies to help
you keep an accurate view:
Apprenticeship: Learning alongside a seasoned veteran gives you a clearer view of your skill level
compared to an expert’s.
Peer Instruction: Collaborative learning with your peers helps you to avoid the kinds of
misconceptions you can have when you study by yourself.
Peer Review: Your fellow students or professionals can tell if you’re doing a good job or not, and
if they give you honest feedback, you can adjust and improve as needed.
Team Learning: When you work in a team of people who have complementary skills, each
member of the team has an opportunity to learn from the others. Additionally, each person’s
strengths are on display, and it’s often apparent if someone is falling short.
Real-World Simulations: Training under conditions that resemble what you will face in real-life
situations is the best way to hone your skills and see any gaps between conceptual learning and
application.
Aside from illusions that alter your perception of your knowledge, your learning can also be impeded by
myths about your ability to learn. There’s a common belief that everyone has a learning style—such as
auditory, kinesthetic, or visual—and that individuals learn best when the style of instruction matches
their learning style.
1. While it may be true that people have distinct preferences about the way they learn, research
shows that learning isn’t inhibited if the style of teaching doesn’t match the learning style. In
fact, everyone learns best when the style of instruction matches the subject of the lesson, such
as using visual means to teach geometry, audio to teach foreign language, or kinesthetic to
teach physics principles on motion.
2. A focus on learning styles tends to limit a student’s views of her own abilities and potential. That
limitation can affect the student’s confidence to try new things, how much effort she puts forth,
and her perseverance in the face of obstacles.
In addition to the myth of learning styles, the myth that intelligence is fixed also impedes people’s
learning. When people believe they’re born with a predetermined capacity for learning, they don’t put
as much effort into learning. However, intelligence isn’t fixed.
In fact, Americans’ average IQ has risen over time. Several factors affect IQ scores, including a person’s
genes, environment, socioeconomic status, and nutrition.
1) Have a growth mindset. People with growth mindsets understand that effort and discipline are critical
to learning, so they work harder, take more risks, and view failures as learning opportunities. By
contrast, people with fixed mindsets believe intelligence is fixed and that it determines success, so they
become helpless in the face of failure because they attribute it to their lack of innate ability.
2) Perform deliberate practice. Deliberate practice is crucial to reaching mastery, and it’s distinct from
mere repetition because it’s solitary, it’s goal-oriented, and it consistently pushes you past your current
ability. Pushing yourself, failing, troubleshooting, and trying again are necessary to create mental models
and achieve mastery.
3) Use memory cues. Memory cues help you organize and retain information using familiar triggers.
Memory cues include mnemonic devices like acronyms or more complex tools like memory palaces.
Now that you understand the principles of effective learning, here are some tips for applying them.
Pause regularly to ask yourself questions about the key concepts in the material you’re learning.
Regularly quiz yourself on new and past material, interleaving multiple subjects. Study the topics
of the questions you get wrong.
Teachers, teach your students about the principles and strategies of effective learning—the importance
of desirable difficulties, failure, and pushing beyond current ability. Incorporate them into your
curriculum by:
Using the principles of spacing, interleaving, and variation in your lesson planning.
Providing study aids that use retrieval practice, elaboration, and generation—such as practice
tests and short-answer exercises.
Asking students to spend 10 minutes at the end of class writing about everything they
remember from the day’s lessons. After the 10 minutes, they should revisit their notes to find
out what they’ve forgotten, and then study that information.
Putting students into small groups to collaborate on high-level conceptual questions posed by
the teacher, or on concepts they’re struggling with in the material.
Introduction
Learning is a lifelong process of building knowledge, experiences, and skills, and then storing them in
your memory to apply to problems you encounter. But as natural as it may seem, you have to
learn how to learn.
Most people hold false beliefs about learning that lead students to study ineffectively and teachers to
teach ineffectively. These methods include:
The most effective strategies for deep comprehension and long-term retention are actually
counterintuitive to the logic behind the most common methods. That’s why this book teaches you how
to learn and study based on data about how your brain comprehends and retains information.
The book’s principles and prescriptions draw from a vast number of research studies. Two of the
authors, cognitive scientists Henry Roediger and Mark McDaniel, collaborated with other researchers on
a 10-year study about how to apply cognitive psychology to improve learning practices, and a number of
their findings are included in the book.
We’ll explore principles and strategies to become a more effective learner. The principles include:
2. Making and learning from mistakes are necessary aspects of the learning process.
3. You’re not a good judge of how well you’re absorbing a lesson, or how well you know something
you learned previously.
4. Students don’t learn any better when the lesson matches their preferred learning styles.
1. Creating Mental Models: Group interrelated concepts or skills into one fluid skillset
3. Generative Learning: Trying to solve a problem before you’re given the solution, even if you do it
wrong
Before we dig into the strategies for maximizing your learning, let’s explore what happens in your
brain when you learn.
1) Encoding: When you learn something new, your brain encodes it by creating memory traces,
which are mental representations of the information. The memory traces are stored in the short-
term memory, as if your brain were taking notes in a notebook.
2) Consolidation: The memory traces in your short-term memory are still somewhat pliable, so the
consolidation process strengthens the knowledge and transfers it to your long-term memory.
Scientists believe that during consolidation, your brain rehashes the lesson, fleshes out gaps in the
memory traces, and connects the new information to your prior knowledge and experiences. This
process requires hours or days, and experts believe sleep aids in consolidation. (Shortform note:
Read more about how sleep improves learning in our summary of Why We Sleep.)
Compare consolidation to revising an essay: Your first draft is rough but gets the general ideas
down, like the encoding process. Then, as you edit the paper, you fill in the gaps and it becomes
more refined. Finally, after you put it away for a while and then come back to write the final draft,
your thoughts clarify and you gain a better sense of what your thesis is and how to illustrate it to
readers by drawing links to information they already know.
3) Retrieval: The purpose of learning is to have that knowledge on hand when you need it—whether
you’re solving a math problem or speaking a second language. This requires that you commit the
information to your long-term memory, and that you create retrieval cues, which connect the new
information to your prior knowledge and experiences.
For example, a Marine learning to parachute in jump school must learn how to hit the ground to
minimize injury. First, trainees practice falling from a standing position and get corrective feedback
on their positioning. Then, they do the same from two feet off the ground. The Marines apply their
knowledge to each progressive level of difficulty as they fall from higher and higher off the ground,
incorporating more complicated skills at each level.
Each time you practice, you create a new experience, creating a new cue and further cementing that
knowledge in your memory. Retrieval cues help you pull up the information in different situations,
making the difference between retaining static facts and being able to use the knowledge when a
situation calls for it. The more retrieval cues you have, the more readily you can recall information.
Additionally, when you retrieve knowledge from your memory, you trigger reconsolidation, which
further bolsters the memory traces and allows you to form even more connections with information
you’ve learned since the knowledge was first consolidated.
Learning is a lifelong process. Your brain is designed with plasticity and flexibility that allow you to
learn and adapt—for example, the way a blind person’s brain heightens her other senses to
compensate for her lack of vision.
You’re born with billions of nerve cells called neurons. Your neurons sprout axons, which stretch like
branches to connect with other neurons’ receiving ports, called dendrites. When an axon connects
with a dendrite, this connection is called a synapse. Synapses are the circuits through which signals
and information travel.
Some axons have a waxy coating called myelin, which acts like the plastic that’s wrapped around the
wires on electrical cords. Scientists believe that the more you practice a skill, the thicker the myelin
coating on the associated axons—and the thicker the myelin, the stronger and faster the signals to
perform that skill. This explains how, after thousands of hours of practice, professional basketball
players’ dribbling synapses are so heavily myelinated that they can do it reflexively.
When skills become habit, experts believe your brain links the motor skill with the cognitive action
so that they fire off simultaneously and subconsciously, rather than through a conscious (albeit
rapid) thought process. The habit is then recoded and stored deep in the brain, in the basal ganglia,
where eye movements and other subconscious acts originate. Many people experience this in the
way they type on a computer keyboard without thinking about what their fingers are doing.
Your brain continues to make new neurons your entire life. This process is called neurogenesis, and
it happens in the hippocampus—the same area that consolidates new information and memories.
Research is ongoing about the connection between neurogenesis and learning and memory, but
there is evidence that when you make connections between different types of information, it
stimulates neurogenesis.
Discover
Books
Articles
My library
Search
Make It Stick
Back to Education
Now let’s explore how to put this information to use with strategies to help you learn and study more
effectively.
1. Comprehension: You want to gain a deep understanding of the underlying principle in order to
understand how it applies to different situations.
2. Retention: You need to remember the information when a problem or situation calls for it, and
when you get a chance to build upon it with more advanced knowledge
When you’re learning something new, simply memorizing the information from your textbook or lecture
notes leads to a shallow comprehension of the topic. Instead, you’ll gain a more meaningful
understanding if you first identify the underlying principles—the rules. The rules are the common
denominators among different examples and contexts, and they’ll guide you when you call on this
knowledge to solve real-world problems.
People who are naturally adept at recognizing the key concepts in lessons and situations are rule
learners. Rule learners know how to weed out irrelevant information to distill the main points.
By contrast, example learners remember specific examples, but they struggle to extract the underlying
principles. As a result, they don’t know how to navigate new situations that don’t match the examples.
One method is to study multiple examples at once—instead of one at a time—in order to more clearly
see the common thread and extract the underlying principles.
Similarly, another method is to examine two different problems at once, in hopes of finding similarities
or differences that illuminate the rules and help you reach each problem’s solution. For example, in one
study, students are given two problems:
1. An army attacking a castle must cross a moat, but the bridges are designed to explode if too
many people cross at once.
2. An inoperable tumor must be treated with radiation, but the amounts of radiation that are small
enough to avoid damaging the surrounding healthy tissue aren’t enough to destroy the tumor.
The students struggle to find a solution to either question in isolation, until they look at both and try to
discern the commonalities between them. In both problems:
3. Smaller portions of the force avoid disaster, but they don’t deliver enough power to solve the
problem
When students extract these similarities, they’re more likely to reach a solution in which they direct
smaller forces at the target through different passages—multiple bridges or different angles of radiation
—at the same time. Additionally, once students identify the underlying principles of the solution, they’re
able to apply it to all different kinds of problems.
After you’ve identified the rules, connect those principles with prior relevant knowledge. This process—
called structure building—creates context, which deepens your understanding. Structure building also
develops mental models, which bring together interrelated concepts or skills into one fluid skill set.
We’ll talk more about mental models next.
High structure builders are adept not only at rule learning, but also at recognizing when additional
information adds values to their structures. Low structure builders, on the other hand, struggle with
these skills.
Experts are unsure whether high structure builders have an innate cognitive advantage, or pick up the
skill intuitively.
Regardless of the explanation, low structure builders can improve using these methods:
1. Regularly stop while listening to a lesson or reading a text to ask yourself what the main
concepts are.
2. Reflect on what you’re learning or how you applied the knowledge in a particular situation.
Think about how you solved a problem, what you could have done differently, and how you can
improve next time. Reflecting on a problem naturally crystallizes the main ideas.
Mental Models
As we mentioned, mental models group knowledge and skills together to create more complex skills.
For example, driving a car involves a broad range of knowledge and skills: You must understand traffic
laws, know how hard to push the gas and brake pedals, and know how to turn on your windshield
wipers without taking your eyes and mind off the road. At first, it feels like you’re juggling all these new
skills at once, but over time and practice they all merge into a mental model that enables you to drive
without consciously thinking about each individual action.
You can adapt your mental models to different situations—for example, applying your knowledge of
driving a car to learn how to drive a bus or a big rig. Just like practicing a specific skill, when
you practice your mental models in different contexts, you improve your ability to apply them in
different situations.
Forming mental models is an essential step to achieving mastery in a skill or subject. People who
become experts in their work—such as professional musicians or NBA players—practice thousands of
hours until they’ve amassed an array of mental models for practically any possible situation. Then, when
they’re playing a concert or a playoff game, they can agilely apply whichever mental model they need in
any situation.
Discover
Books
Articles
My library
Search
Make It Stick
Back to Education
You’ve extracted the key concepts from a lesson and used them to build a mental model. Now you need
to remember the information.
The most effective way to improve retention of new information is through retrieval practice. Retrieval
is any exercise that requires you to recall the information or skill you’ve learned. Retrieval practice can
take the form of:
A classroom quiz
Making up your own questions about key concepts to test yourself later
Think of learning like stringing beads for a necklace: Every new fact, concept, and skill is a bead, and
your memory is the string. The beads will simply slide off the other end of the string if you don’t tie a
knot to keep them in place. Retrieval is the knot at the end of the string that prevents you from
forgetting what you learn. When you repeatedly practice retrieval, you’re double- and triple-knotting the
string to make sure the beads don’t slip off.
The better you remember something, the more reflexively you can recall that information when you
need it, which is a key aspect of mastery. For example, a quarterback practices movements and
scenarios until they become second nature—because when it’s game time, he won’t have a spare
second to stop and think about what he has to do.
Before we explain how to maximize the benefits of retrieval practice, let’s go over the problems with the
strategies most people use: Rereading and massed practice.
You have a test or presentation in a few days. You have pages of notes you need to burn into your
memory. What do you do?
If you’re like most people, you read the material—and then read it again, and again, perhaps
highlighting and annotating along the way.
Most people believe that rereading and massed practice (practicing one thing over and over in one
sitting) are the most effective ways to learn and remember information. However, single-subject focus
and endless repetition present three problems:
1) They take a lot of time. The time you spend rereading would be better spent using other, more
effective strategies, which we’ll get into later.
2) They don't help you remember the information long term. You may remember the material long
enough to pass a test the following day, but you’ll forget most of it by the time the midterm rolls
around. In fact, research proves that retention quickly fades with these methods.
In a pair of identical experiments conducted at two different universities, one group of participants read
the material once, and another group read it twice in one sitting. When both groups were tested right
after reading, the group that read the material twice did slightly better. However, when the groups were
tested later, there was no difference—the benefit of rereading was only temporary.
3) They fool you into thinking you’ve mastered the material. Rereading in succession makes you more
familiar with the specific text and its wording, which tricks you into thinking you’ve mastered the
concepts behind the text. Mastery requires you to know the information, grasp the underlying ideas and
concepts, and understand how to apply them to different situations.
You may have understood a concept as it’s described in a lecture or a textbook, but can you explain it to
someone else in your own words? Can you come up with another example of it? Can you apply it to
another context? Rereading alone doesn’t illuminate where your gaps in understanding are.
There is a myth among some educators that learning and studying are more effective when they’re
presented in ways that are easy and enjoyable. If students are engaged and having fun, they must also
be learning, right?
On the contrary, the harder your brain has to work to retrieve the information, the better it cements it
in your memory. You can make retrieval more challenging in two ways:
1. By using generation, or generative learning, which requires you to generate the answer.
Flashcards, short-answer questions, and essay prompts use generation, as opposed to true/false
and multiple-choice questions, which offer possible answers.
2. By delaying the retrieval practice, which forces your brain to work harder to remember the
material. The delay should be long enough that your memory has gotten a little fuzzy, but not so
long that you have to relearn the material. The longer you wait before the first test, the more
you’ll forget in the interim. However, research shows that the rate of forgetting slows
significantly after the first retrieval practice.
In one study, participants remembered pairs of words better when they had to use generation and first
figure out one of the words in each pair and fill in missing letters. For example, participants were given
the clue “foot-s__e” and had to determine that it should be “foot-shoe.” Although the exercise was
fairly simple, the additional effort of having to fill in the blanks—as opposed to simply reading the pairs
—improved participants’ retention.
Additionally, when participants were tested later, their memory was better if they were first exposed to
a word pair and then had to fill in 20 other word pairs before doing their first retrieval practice.
Again, the slight delay made the initial retrieval a little harder, and that effort improved retention.
When you’re first learning a concept, use generation by attempting to solve a problem before you know
how. Even if you come up with the wrong answer, you’ll gain a deeper understanding and better
retention of the solution when you learn it.
1. As you try to figure out the answer, you search your brain for prior knowledge that might help
lead you to it. For example, if you’re trying to figure out the capital of Texas, you start by listing
the Texas cities you know and anything you know about them. When you do learn the correct
answer, your prior knowledge is already pulled up and primed to make connections with this
new information, which is a critical aspect of learning and retention.
2. When you fail to come up with the right answer to a problem, you pay more attention to the
solution when you learn it.
In addition to the difficulty, the timing of your retrieval practice also impacts its effectiveness. The most
effective approach is to test soon after you’re exposed to the material—after a slight delay, as we
discussed in Principle 1—and then follow up with additional tests at various intervals.
After the first test, the longer you continue to practice retrieval at spaced-out intervals, the longer-
lasting your retention will be. Additionally, regular testing deepens your level of understanding, which
improves your ability to apply the knowledge in different contexts.
One study had students listen to a story and then try to recall the 60 objects that were mentioned in the
story. Retention among different groups of students shows the impact of immediate and frequent
retrieval:
Students tested right after hearing the story remembered 53% of the objects, and they could
still remember 39% a week later.
Students who weren’t tested immediately only remembered 28% of the objects a week later.
Students who were tested three different times within the first week remembered 53% of the
objects a week later. (Shortform note: The book doesn’t specify at what intervals they took the
three tests.)
Furthermore, when corrective feedback is slightly delayed, it leads to better retention than immediate
feedback. Think of immediate feedback like learning to ride a bike with training wheels: You’re corrected
automatically and begin to rely on that support, inhibiting your true learning and mastery of the
material.
Now that you know the principles of retrieval practice, how can you apply them? One way is through
reflection.
You can reflect on a lesson from class by looking at your notes or the text and using a strategy called
elaboration, in which you rephrase the main concepts and connect them with your existing knowledge
and prior experiences. For example, if you’re reading a book about the history of Mexico, think about
everything you already know about Mexico’s past and present and see how your knowledge connects
with the information in the text.
Additionally, each real-world situation that requires you to use your knowledge and skills offers an
opportunity to improve your performance and retention through reflection. After you have an
experience that uses certain knowledge, think about:
As you reflect, mentally rehearse how to apply your knowledge, which deepens its imprint in your mind.
Frequent tests and quizzes are another key element of retrieval practice. In a classroom setting, testing
is often used and thought of as a measure of students’ retention, but it’s generally overlooked as
a tool to aid retention. However, small changes can make a big impact on students’ learning.
Instead of having just a few big tests during a semester, students benefit from more frequent tests, such
as unit tests and low-stakes quizzes. In addition to improving retention, the benefits of this approach
include:
Increasing students’ attendance, focus during lessons, and at-home studying because they know
they have an impending test on the material.
Decreasing students’ testing anxiety, because each test or quiz has a smaller impact on their
overall grades than if their entire grades depended on just two big tests. (Shortform note: The
book doesn’t cite this reason, but the regularity of testing may also make students more
accustomed to and comfortable with testing.)
Helping students gauge what they know and which topics they need to study more.
Helping teachers gauge what students know and what material needs to be reviewed.
Discover
Books
Articles
My library
Search
Make It Stick
Back to Education
Now that we know that spacing out your retrieval practice improves retention, we’ll discuss why it
works and offer some methods for spacing your practice.
As we talked about, when you learn something new, your brain undergoes a process of consolidation,
which can take hours or days. Spaced practice gives your brain the time it needs to strengthen the new
knowledge and store it in your long-term memory through consolidation.
Additionally, the effort of retrieving the knowledge from your last practice session triggers
reconsolidation, further embedding the information.
Spaced practice develops your “underlying habit strength,” which prepares you to use that knowledge
when you need it. Spaced practice feels less productive than massed practice initially because you’ve
forgotten some of the material and it feels like you don’t have a grasp of it—but that extra effort is
precisely what makes the method effective.
Many people resist spaced practice because it doesn’t give them the immediate gratification of seeing
improvements as they practice that comes with massed practice, which scientists call “momentary
strength.”
However, that feeling belies the fact that momentary strength quickly fades, because massed practice
stores information in your short-term memory.
There are two methods that improve comprehension and retention while organically spacing your
practice.
Interleaved Practice
One way to space out your practice and improve your retention is by interleaving, or mixing up your
practice among multiple related topics or skills. Interleaving improves your comprehension and
retention in two ways:
1. Switching among different topics naturally spaces out your practice in any one area.
2. Changing your focus among related topics helps you make connections among them, which
deepens your understanding of each subject.
The key to interleaving is to switch to the next skill or concept before you’ve finished practicing one. It
feels counterintuitive and frustrating to switch gears before you’re ready, which is why teachers and
students often resist interleaving.
In fact, in contrast to the momentary strength you get from massed practice, interleaving actually
hinders your performance while you’re learning the material. However, in the long term, this method
still results in better retention.
In one study, college students learned how to calculate the volumes of four geometric shapes. One
group of students solved practice problems that were grouped by the shape, while the other group of
students solved an interleaved set of practice problems. That day, students doing massed practice
performed better, averaging 89% correct answers, compared to 60% among students who did
interleaved practice. However, on a test the following week, the students who’d done interleaved
practice averaged 63% correct, whereas the other group dropped to 20%.
(Shortform note: Although the interleaved group improved slightly, while the massed practice group
dropped drastically, the interleaved group never performed at a level close to the massed practice
group’s initial work. The book doesn’t address how the interleaved group could have raised its score
overall—perhaps simply by doing more interleaved practice.)
Interleaving simulates and better prepares you for the final test—and real life—where you’ll encounter
situations that require a mix of different skills and knowledge.
Varied Practice
Varied practice involves practicing a skill in different contexts, which strengthens your ability to apply
that skill to a variety of situations. Varied practice strengthens your understanding of the underlying
principles and makes you better at discerning among different contexts to determine the best way to
approach a situation.
One study illustrates the effectiveness of variation: Two groups of children practiced throwing bean bags
into buckets. The first group practiced only with buckets that were three feet away, while the other
group practiced with a mix of buckets that were two and four feet away. After a few months of
practicing, everyone was tested on throwing bean bags into buckets three feet away—and the kids
who’d practiced on the mix of buckets (none of which were three feet away) far outperformed the kids
who’d only practiced on three-feet buckets.
Neuroimages of people learning new motor skills reveal that varied practice engages an area of the
brain that deals with more difficult motor skills, while mass practice engages a part of the brain that
deals with simpler tasks. This suggests that learning a skill through varied practice produces a more
complex mastery, which broadens its applicability.
Similar results have been found in cognitive tasks. One experiment asked a group of students to solve
the same anagram (word scramble) repeatedly, while another group of students solved different
anagrams that made the same word. When all the students were tested on the anagram that the first
group had solved—the only anagram that group worked on throughout the experiment—the students in
the second group still outperformed them.
However, when varying your practice, be careful not to slip into blocked practice, which is doing
variations in the same order. Blocked practice is like failing to shuffle your flashcards: You get a variety
of topics and practice spaced-out retrieval, but encountering them in the same order every time limits
the effectiveness.
Interleaved and varied practice strengthen your conceptual knowledge of the underlying principles, as
opposed to a simple surface-level understanding of facts and figures.
The conceptual knowledge you gain through these methods improves your ability to discriminate, or
determine what knowledge or which skill you need in various situations. This is a crucial aspect of using
what you learn in real-life situations.
In one experiment, researchers asked participants to study several artists’ paintings so that they could
look at a piece of art and be able to identify the painter. Some participants used massed practice,
studying each artist extensively before moving onto the next, while others used interleaving and
switched among different artists.
Interleaving helped participants see the differences among different artists’ works, as opposed to
the commonalities in each individual artist’s works. That ability to discriminate helped them identify
who’d painted not only the paintings they’d studied, but also paintings they’d never seen before.
No matter how well you know something, you must continue spaced practice in order to maintain your
mastery. Don’t fall into the “familiarity trap,” when you neglect a skill because you feel you’ve got it
down pat. The better you know something, the less frequently you need to practice it—but never stop
practicing it altogether.
For example, a basketball coach may spend the majority of practices on shooting drills, running plays,
and playing scrimmages. But the coach must also regularly drill dribbling and passing, even though
they’re basic skills that are ingrained in the players’ repertoire. The players can’t perform the higher-
level skills if they lose proficiency in the fundamentals.
Prioritize your practice with flashcards organized in the Leitner system, which naturally spaces your
practice. Divide your flashcards into four sections in a box:
1. In the first section, put flashcards you struggle with the most. These are the cards you’ll practice
most often.
2. In the second section, put flashcards you’re slightly better at. You’ll practice these about half as
often as the first section.
3. In the third section, put flashcards you’re even better at. You’ll practice these less often than the
previous section.
4. In the fourth section, put flashcards you seldom get wrong. You’ll practice these the least
When you have a wrong answer, move that flashcard up to the next section. When you get a right
answer, move the flashcard back a section.
The goal of learning is to acquire and retain knowledge to use in real-world situations. Spaced retrieval,
varied practice, and interleaving simulate the randomness of practical experience—whether you’re a
doctor seeing patients with a variety of different ailments or a football player encountering different
situations in a game: Each patient and each play is a test in its own right.
Discover
Books
Articles
My library
Search
Make It Stick
Back to Education
The learning strategies we’ve discussed improve comprehension and retention because the more your
brain has to work, the deeper it embeds the information. In contrast to the belief that learning is
effective when it’s easy and enjoyable, these kinds of challenges—called “desirable difficulties”—
improve long-term learning.
To be clear, there are also undesirable difficulties that don’t benefit your learning. A difficulty is
undesirable if:
1. You don’t have the prior knowledge to overcome and learn from the difficulty
If you push yourself, take risks, and engage in learning that incorporates desirable difficulties, you’ll
inevitably fail sometimes. Failure is not only a critical aspect of learning because it’s an invaluable
opportunity to learn from your mistake.
People who understand that mistakes and failures are critical to learning are more inclined to:
Research proves the benefits of desirable difficulties in learning, but negative attitudes toward failure
still persist from outdated theories.
In the mid-20th century, psychologist B.F. Skinner suggested that wrong answers inhibit learning and
reflect poor teaching. Skinner pushed for “errorless learning” methods, in which teachers introduced
new material bit by bit to make it easily digestible, and then tested students while the lesson was still
fresh.
Most classrooms still don’t embrace errors. As a result, many students develop a fear of failure that
impedes their learning in two ways: First, their fear inhibits them from trying challenging lessons.
Second, fear of failure produces anxiety in high-pressure situations, such as tests. Anxiety taxes your
working memory, which is your capacity to keep information in your head while solving a problem.
When performance anxiety strains your working memory, you have less mental bandwidth to actually
figure out the problem in front of you.
Discover
Books
Articles
My library
Search
Make It Stick
Back to Education
The strategies we’ve discussed give you the tools for effective learning, but the tools alone aren’t
enough—you must clear away the illusions and myths that impede your drive to learn.
Misperceptions about your competence and myths about your ability to learn can both inhibit you from
pursuing greater levels of knowledge.
Continued learning requires you to consistently strengthen and build upon your skills and knowledge. In
order to expand your learning, you need to know what you know, what you don’t know, and what you
need to work on.
The problem is that most people are poor judges of their own competencies. Humans are naturally
prone to illusions and cognitive biases that make us blind to our shortcomings.
1. The automatic, unconscious system that’s responsible for your intuitions and knee-jerk
reactions. This system is critical for situations that require split-second decisions and reflexive
action, whether you’re getting away from a dangerous situation or defending against another
player on the basketball court.
2. The controlled, conscious system that’s responsible for logic and reason. This system works a
little more slowly, helps you analyze problems, and balances the impulsivity of the first system.
For example, your unconscious system notices a snake and makes you bolt away, but a few
seconds later your second system kicks in and makes you realize that it’s not a snake, after all—
it’s simply a garden hose.
(Shortform note: Learn more about these two systems in our summaries of Thinking, Fast and
Slow and Blink.)
When your conscious system fails to correct a misperception by your unconscious system, you can end
up believing illusions that make you misjudge your ability, such as:
1. Perceptual illusions: Perceptual illusions distort your senses and make you misinterpret images,
sounds, or other sensations. For example, pilots can encounter optical illusions or, in extreme
situations, illusions that make them think the plane is flying level when it’s actually tilted.
2. Cognitive biases: Cognitive biases are caused by systematic problems with your way of thinking
that impact your judgment and decision making. For example, the bandwagon effect is a
cognitive bias that makes people more likely to think or do something if other people think or do
it.
Paradoxically, people sometimes unwittingly create their own illusions in an attempt to make sense of
the world. People naturally want to find order and reason, so they unconsciously create narratives that
explain why something is the way it is.
People also create narratives that explain events in their own lives, including circumstances they’ve
faced and actions they’ve taken. For example, someone may say that no one in her family has attended
college because they’re not “academic” types, which reflects the narrative she and her family have
created.
Narratives are a stronger influence than objective facts, yet people fail to recognize or vastly
underestimate this influence.
A common narrative in educational settings is the belief that everyone has a preferred learning style,
though everyone has some ability in each area.
There are many learning styles theories and models, each defining different types of learning styles
based on different criteria. A common model defines three learning styles:
1. Auditory: students who learn best through oral presentations, such as lectures
3. Visual: students who gain the most from graphs and images
Many people also believe that students learn best when they’re taught according to their learning styles,
but focusing on learning styles tends to limit a student’s views of her own abilities and potential. For
example, if a student self-identifies as a kinesthetic learner, she’s less likely to put as much effort into a
reading assignment because it supposedly doesn’t play to her strengths.
In fact, while it may be true that people have distinct preferences about the way they learn, learning
isn’t inhibited if the style of teaching doesn’t match the learning style. Researchers found that the few
studies that had adequately tested the theory either failed to affirm it or debunked it outright. The
takeaway was that all students learn best when the instruction style matches the subject of the lesson—
such as using visual means to teach geometry, audio to teach foreign language, or kinesthetic to teach
physics principles on motion.
While it turns out your learning style isn’t a big factor in your ability to learn, the way you see yourself
and your potential is. This is part of your narrative, which shapes how you interpret your experiences
and actions. Your narrative affects your confidence to try new things, how much effort you put forth,
and your perseverance in the face of obstacles.
Memory Distortions
Narratives are so strong that they shape how you interpret and remember your experiences. In other
words, your memory is inherently moldable.
On one hand, your memory’s pliability is critical to your ability to learn: Everything you learn becomes a
memory, and every time you recall that lesson you’re making new connections and creating new cues
for that information, which further embeds it in your memory. The ability to add to your memory in this
way allows you to deepen your understanding and better retain the information.
On the other hand, your tendency to create distorted memories—and fail to realize that they’re
distorted—can be problematic.
Illusions of Memory
Memories are mere representations of events—not accurate recordings—and thus they easily become
distorted. There’s no way you can remember every detail of an experience. Instead, you remember
certain aspects, and when you call up the memory, you unconsciously fill in the details.
Flashbulb Memories: You tend to believe that there’s no way you’d forget or mistake any detail
of major, emotional events because you have a “flashbulb memory” of the experience—you
recall where you were, what you did, and how you felt. However, research shows that although
people tend to have the highest confidence in their most emotional memories, these are the
memories that become altered the most over time.
Hindsight Bias, or the Knew-It-All-Along Effect: When you’re reflecting on an event, you’re likely
to inflate how predictable it was, even though you couldn’t have actually predicted it before it
happened.
Interference: If you’re exposed to something right before or after an experience, it can distort
the memory of that experience. For example, if a witness to a crime views photos of suspects
and then subsequently looks at a lineup, she’s more likely to falsely accuse someone in the
lineup if she’s already seen his photo.
Mistaking Implications for Fact: As you naturally fill in the details of your memory, you’re likely
to remember things that you understood to be implied and assumed to be fact, but which may
not be. For example, when you recall a meeting with your boss about your new promotion, you
probably assumed that a pay raise was implied, and thus you may falsely remember your boss
stating that you’d receive a raise with your new title, but that’s not the case.
Power of Suggestion: Other people’s suggestions can heavily influence and alter your memories.
For example, study participants watched a video of a car running a stop sign and hitting another
car. Those who were asked how fast the car was going when it “smashed” into the second car
guessed 41 miles per hour, while those who were asked how fast the car was going when it
“contacted” the second car guessed 32 miles per hour. By simply changing the language of the
question, researchers changed participants’ memories of the video.
Social Contagion of Memory, or Memory Conformity: If you and a friend are recalling a joint
experience, you’re likely to merge her memories with your own—even if she supposedly
remembers something that didn’t actually happen. In other words, other people’s errors can
contaminate your memory.
Furthermore, you can entirely fabricate memories under certain circumstances, such as:
Feeling of Knowing: When something is familiar, you’re more likely to believe it’s true. This
means that if you hear the same lie enough times, you eventually believe it’s the truth.
Imagination Inflation: If you imagine something vividly enough, you can start to believe it
happened and mistake your visualization for an actual memory.
False Perceptions
There are still more ways our minds trick us into misjudging our knowledge and abilities. These include:
Curse of Knowledge: The more proficient you are in a particular skill or subject area, the more
ingrained your mental models become. The more ingrained your mental models, the harder it is
to break them down into individual steps in order to teach someone else, and the more likely
you are to underestimate how long it will take someone to learn the skill.
False Consensus Effect: You’re inclined to assume that other people think the way you do
because you underestimate how much your individual paradigms influence the way you
interpret the world. If you mistakenly assume you’re on the same page with people around you,
you may fail to see the shortcomings in your performance.
Fluency Illusions: If you easily follow a text or lecture about a topic, you may mistakenly think
that your fluency with the content means you have mastery of the concepts—but, in reality, you
may have just read or heard a simplified presentation of the topic.
Misdiagnosing Problems: Sometimes, your mental models lead you astray when you encounter
a problem that you think is familiar and apply your tried-and-true solution, only to find out that
it’s a different kind of problem and requires a different approach. For example, brain surgeons
typically have to perform surgery slowly and steadily, but if certain conditions create pressure in
the brain, their patients’ lives depend on them doing the opposite and working as quickly as
possible.
Oblivious Incompetence: People who are the least competent in a given skill are often the most
oblivious to their shortcomings and, thus, don’t think they need to improve. However, they can
counteract this by learning how to more accurately judge their knowledge and skills.
You’re not the best judge of your own competence, and that makes it difficult to effectively improve
your knowledge and skills. But you can improve—if you know which cues to trust, which cues not to
trust, and the tools to more accurately gauge your competence.
Don’t rely on these cues to judge your proficiency:
How easily you recall information a day or more after you learn the information
How easily you can explain a concept or lesson in your own words
Here are some learning strategies that help you keep an accurate view of your competence:
Apprenticeship: Learning alongside a seasoned veteran gives you a clearer view of your skill level
compared to an expert’s.
Peer Instruction: Collaborative learning with your peers helps you to avoid the kinds of
misconceptions you can have when you study by yourself. An example of peer instruction is if
students first read a lesson, then listen to a class lecture, which is punctuated with questions
about the concepts. After spending a couple minutes on each question, students gather in small
groups to discuss the answers they reached.
Peer Review: Your fellow students or professionals can tell if you’re doing a good job or not, and
if they give you honest feedback, you can adjust and improve as needed.
Team Learning: When you work in a team of people who have complementary skills, each
member of the team has an opportunity to learn from the others. Additionally, each person’s
strengths are on display, and it’s often apparent if someone is falling short.
Real-World Simulations: Training under conditions that resemble what you will face in real-life
situations is the best way to hone your skills and see any gaps between conceptual learning and
application.
Discover
Books
Articles
My library
Search
Make It Stick
Back to Education
If the purpose of learning is to move through life more effectively, the measure of your intelligence
should be how well you navigate each day. But, for many reasons, people want a way to quantify
cumulative intelligence.
Modern psychologists largely agree that there are at least two kinds of intelligence:
1. Fluid intelligence is your capacity to think both logically and abstractly, understand how things
relate, and keep relevant information front-of-mind while solving a problem.
2. Crystallized intelligence is your library of knowledge about how the world works as well as the
mental models you’ve created from your experiences.
Models of Intelligence
Various psychologists have theories that expand upon the different areas of intelligence. One example is
Howard Gardner’s model that lists eight kinds of intelligence:
2. Spatial: the ability to visualize things in your mind and to gauge three-dimensional spaces
6. Interpersonal: the ability to pick up on people’s mental and emotional states and work with
them
7. Intrapersonal: self-awareness and the ability to accurately judge your own knowledge and
competence
8. Naturalistic: the ability to relate to your natural surroundings (such as a hunter or gardener
does)
2. Creative: Thinking outside the box to use what you know to create new ideas and solutions
3. Practical: Adapting and applying new ideas and solutions in the varied contexts of daily life
(street smarts)
Sternberg did a study of children in Kenya that tested their practical knowledge of herbal medicines,
which would help them in daily life, as well as their analytical knowledge, which helps them in school.
Children who knew more about herbal medicines tended to perform worse at school, and vice versa.
Sternberg reached the conclusion that the difference depended upon whether a child’s family valued
and emphasized practical knowledge or academic (analytical) knowledge.
Sternberg’s study produced two important takeaways about traditional intelligence tests:
2. They measure what people know at the time they take the test. People learn continually
throughout their lives, and intelligence tests indicate nothing about test-takers’ ability or
potential to learn more.
In order to improve upon the shortcomings of traditional tests, Sternberg and Elena Grigorenko
developed dynamic testing. The premise of dynamic testing is that people constantly learn and raise
their competence, so dynamic testing accounts for and contributes to that continual improvement.
Redoubling efforts to improve in the areas where you performed poorly on the test
Instead of interpreting low test scores as inability, dynamic testing frames them as areas that simply
need more attention. Additionally, dynamic testing is a better indicator of students’ potential to learn,
rather than their past learning.
When it comes to gauging intelligence, many people default to the IQ test, which measures logical and
verbal ability.
Contrary to what many people think, your IQ isn’t predetermined. In fact, Americans’ average IQ has
risen over time, likely because of changes in nutrition, schools, and culture.
1. Genes
3. Socioeconomic status: In more affluent families, the parents tend to have higher levels of
education as well as jobs that give them more resources to support their children’s learning.
4. Nutrition: Certain vitamins and nutrients support the brain’s health and boost its capacity for
learning. Specifically, fatty acids aid nerve cell development and the formation of new synapses.
Studies showed babies’ IQ scores were 3.5 to 6.5 points higher if they were exposed to fatty acid
supplements directly or through their pregnant or breastfeeding mothers.
IQ measures fluid and crystallized intelligence. The methods we’ve discussed—including consistent and
spaced retrieval practice—improve your crystallized intelligence. But science hasn’t proven that you can
improve your fluid intelligence.
Working memory is a key aspect of fluid intelligence, and that’s what brain training games, videos, and
exercises aim to improve. Brain training methods are largely based on a 2008 Swiss study in which
participants had to remember two different kinds of information—a number sequence and the location
of a small light—for increasingly longer intervals while they viewed other lights and number sequences.
All the participants improved on this task by the end of the experiment, and those who’d done the
exercise the most had the biggest improvements. This was the first time research suggested people
could improve their fluid intelligence. However, there were several issues with the study.
1. Participants did just one task, which makes it impossible to know whether the participants
improved their working memories or merely improved their performance on this task.
Improving one skill doesn’t affect other skills; a professional pianist’s superior dexterity on the
keys has no impact on her dexterity when crocheting a scarf.
3. The sample size was small (35 people) and not diverse.
Although the participants may not have actually improved their fluid intelligence, they left the
study feeling like they’d strengthened their mental capacity. This effect was merely the participants’
perception, but higher confidence does correlate with more perseverance. In other words, when the
participants encounter a problem, their chance of success will be higher—not because they’ve made
mental improvements, but because their confidence will make them try harder to solve it.
Discover
Books
Articles
My library
Search
Make It Stick
Back to Education
Aside from raising your IQ score, there are strategies you can use to make the most of your intelligence
with diligence, practice, and tools to help you remember information.
Grit and perseverance are far more important ingredients for success than intelligence. People who
have a “growth mindset” are empowered to take their success into their own hands because they
understand that effort and discipline are critical to their learning potential. These people work harder,
take more risks, and view failures as learning opportunities.
On the other hand, people who have a “fixed mindset” have no sense of control over their own destinies
because they believe that intelligence is the bottom-line determiner of success: They were either born
with it or they weren’t. These people become helpless when they encounter failure because they
attribute it to their lack of intelligence and ability.
Psychologist Carol Dweck studied this phenomenon and found several other characteristics associated
with growth and fixed mindsets.
Create learning goals, which focus on gaining information and skills. They set increasingly
challenging goals in order to continually expand their knowledge.
Tend to receive praise for their effort, which encourages them to continue to work hard and
persevere.
Create performance goals, which focus on measurable achievements that validate their skills.
They set more conservative goals to ensure they can achieve them and receive the validation
they seek.
Tend to receive praise for their intelligence, which discourages them from taking risks, for fear
of blowing their image as an intelligent person.
(Shortform note: Read more about the growth mindset in our summary of Mindset, and about the value
and the building blocks of grit in our summary of Grit.)
Mastery requires thousands of hours of deliberate practice. Deliberate practice is more than mere
repetition—it has several distinct characteristics, including:
Being solitary
Being goal-oriented
(Shortform note: Read more about the power of deliberate practice in our summary of Peak.)
Pushing yourself, failing, troubleshooting, and trying again are necessary for building the skills and
creating the mental models that lead to mastery. Through deliberate practice, you gradually develop a
repertoire of increasingly high-level skills that you can then apply in a wide variety of situations.
Although deliberate practice is generally most effective when it’s solitary, coaches and trainers can play
pivotal roles in helping you to see your areas of weakness, providing corrective feedback, and pushing
you to redouble your efforts on the areas where you’re struggling most.
Memory cues are tools for shorthanding information that you need to remember. Memory cues can
help you remember facts on a surface level, but they’re most valuable as a way of organizing and
retaining information that you’ve already mastered. For example, you can use a mnemonic device to
remember names and dates for a history test, but you won’t ace the test if you don’t understand
the significance of those names and dates.
Mnemonic devices are tools that range from simple to complex to remember various types of
information. For example, the acronym ROY G BIV is a mnemonic device for remembering the colors of
the rainbow. In order for a mnemonic device to be useful, it needs to tether reminders to something
very familiar, so that the things you need to remember are all tied to something nearly impossible to
forget.
One type of mnemonic device that helps you recall larger amounts of information is a memory palace.
Memory palaces capitalize on the idea that it’s easier to remember images than words.
1. Choose a physical space or route that you’re very familiar with, such as your home or your
commute to work.
2. Choose objects or features that stand out in that physical space, such as your couch or a major
intersection.
3. Make a mental link between each object and something you want to remember. For example,
imagine yourself sitting on your couch with a friend who you need to remember to call.
When you need to recall the information, take a mental tour of the space. As you imagine yourself
passing by each object, its associated reminder should pop up in your mind.
Another type of mnemonic device is a rhyme scheme, in which you create rhymes that associate your
reminders with concrete images.
An example of a rhyme scheme is the peg method, which is a memory aid for lists of items. The peg
method assigns an image to each number, from 1 to 20; the images always remain the same, no matter
what you need to remember. Then you associate a reminder with each image. Say you assign “shoe” to
2, and you associate shoe with a reminder to go for a run.
Discover
Books
Articles
My library
Search
Make It Stick
Back to Education
Now that you understand the principles of effective learning, let’s look at how to apply them to your life.
Think of your intelligence as a work in progress and remember that you’re constantly learning.
Take an active approach to your learning. Reading this summary is a good first step. Follow up with
these strategies:
Pause regularly to ask yourself questions about the material you’re learning. These questions
may include:
Think of a metaphor or image that demonstrates the principle you’re learning (for example,
thinking of how the movement of a bowling ball illustrates a law of physics).
Engage with your reading by anticipating what the main concepts will be and trying to define
them before you’ve found the definition in the text. As you read, see if you were right.
Similarly, try to solve math and science problems before you learn the formula. Once you learn
the formula, go back and see how close you were.
Schedule time to regularly spend a few minutes quizzing yourself on new and past material,
interleaving multiple subjects. Check your answers and review the topics of the questions you
get wrong.
To get the most out of a conference or professional development training, use these strategies:
Using a copy of the schedule or presentation materials, test yourself about the main concepts.
Schedule monthly emails to yourself with questions about the material to continue regular self-
testing.
Teachers play an important role in teaching their students how to learn and designing instruction that
incorporates effective learning and studying strategies.
First, help your students understand the principles of effective learning, including:
Desirable difficulties are important for deep understanding and long-term retention
The only way to achieve mastery is to consistently reach beyond your current ability level
Failures are not only inevitable but also provide invaluable learning opportunities
Using the principles of spacing, interleaving, and variation in the way you present information
Giving frequent, low-stakes quizzes and being transparent about the quiz schedule. Students
generally react and perform better when they know when to expect quizzes, and the
anticipation doesn’t reduce the quizzes’ effectiveness.
Providing study aids that use retrieval practice, elaboration, and generation—such as practice
tests, reflection writing exercises, short answer retrieval exercises, and problems assigned
before a lesson is reviewed in class
Explaining the methods to students, and acknowledging the initial frustrations that these can
cause to prevent students from getting discouraged and distrusting the strategies
Additionally, consider using some of these strategies to integrate the principles of effective learning:
Bloom’s Taxonomy Answer Keys: For each test, create an answer key that includes multiple
answers for every question—an answer for each level of Bloom’s taxonomy of learning. Bloom’s
taxonomy describes the different levels of comprehension: remembering, understanding,
applying, analyzing, evaluating, creating (creating may not be relevant for many test questions).
When students get their tests back, provide the answer key and ask them to consider at what
level they answered each question and how they can reach a higher level. For example, did they
merely recall the three branches of government (remember)? Did they explain how the
branches interact through checks and balances (understand)? Did they illustrate how the three
branches work to pass a piece of legislation (apply)?
Free Recall: At the end of class, students spend 10 minutes writing everything they remember
from the day’s lessons. Even if they feel stuck after just a couple minutes, they must spend the
entire 10 minutes trying to recall anything they can. After 10 minutes, they revisit their notes
from the day, check that what they’ve recalled is correct, and—most importantly—see what
they’ve forgotten. Then they know they must study the information they forgot.
High-Structure Class Design: Create a high-structure class, which includes daily and weekly
retrieval exercises that are low-stakes but still count toward students’ grades.
Learning Paragraphs: At the end of the week, students write a paragraph answering a question
that reflects on something from that week—it may be about a main concept from the material,
or how the student would improve her performance on the next test.
Role Playing: For practice skills, have students role play, which allows them to use generative
learning, get feedback, and reflect on how they could improve their approach.
Small Groups: Students work in small groups during class to answer a high-level conceptual
question the teacher poses. After a while, one student from each group explains her group’s
answer to the rest of the class, and the class critiques the group’s conclusions.
Summary Sheets: At the start of each week, students turn in a summary sheet of the previous
week’s lessons, preferably through illustrations (if the subject allows) with notations pointing
out key concepts.
Testing Groups: Replace study groups with testing groups. Without referring to their textbooks,
students gather in groups to discuss questions they’re struggling with and collaborate to find the
answers. Each student typically knows different aspects of the answer, and together they can
piece together the entire concept.