XTHBVSDG
XTHBVSDG
XTHBVSDG
共Received 20 July 2009; revised manuscript received 11 November 2009; published 23 February 2010兲
Using density-functional theory within the generalized gradient approximation, we investigate the interac-
tion between atomic oxygen and Cu共100兲 and Cu共110兲 surfaces. We consider the adsorption of oxygen at
various on-surface and subsurface sites of Cu共100兲 for coverages of 1/8 to 1 monolayers 共ML兲. We find that
oxygen at a coverage of 1/2 ML preferably binds to Cu共100兲 in a missing-row surface reconstruction, while
oxygen adsorption on the nonreconstructed surface is preferred at 1/4 ML coverage consistent with experi-
mental results. For Cu共110兲, we consider oxygen binding to both nonreconstructed and added-row reconstruc-
tions at various coverages. For coverages up to 1/2 ML coverage, the most stable configuration is predicted to
be a p共2 ⫻ 1兲 missing-row structure. At higher oxygen exposures, a surface transition to a c共6 ⫻ 2兲 added strand
configuration with 2/3 ML oxygen coverage occurs. Through surface Gibbs free energies, taking into account
temperature and oxygen partial pressure, we construct 共p , T兲 surface phase diagrams for O/Cu共100兲 and
O/Cu共110兲. On both crystal faces, oxygenated surface structures are stable prior to bulk oxidation. We combine
our results with equivalent 共p , T兲 surface free energy data for the O/Cu共111兲 surface to predict the morphology
of copper nanoparticles in an oxygen environment.
Our discussion is organized as follows: In Sec. II, our 0.002 eV/ Å2, respectively. For Cu共110兲, coverages of be-
computational methodology is detailed, including the defini- tween 1/8 to 1 ML are achieved using 共2 ⫻ 1兲, 共3 ⫻ 1兲, 共4
tions of several calculated quantities and a brief description ⫻ 1兲, 共2 ⫻ 2兲, 共3 ⫻ 2兲, 共8 ⫻ 1兲, 共2 ⫻ 4兲, and c共6 ⫻ 2兲 cells.
of the ab initio atomistic thermodynamics approach. Section Brillouin-zone integrations are performed using 共12⫻ 12
III A revisits the clean Cu共100兲 and Cu共110兲 surfaces, which ⫻ 1兲 and 共6 ⫻ 12⫻ 1兲 Monkhorst-Pack grids for the 共1 ⫻ 1兲
serves to validate our methodology against previous results surface unit cells of Cu共100兲 and Cu共110兲, respectively. For
in the literature. In Sec. III B, we present our calculations for the larger surface unit cells, correspondingly smaller grids
the O/Cu共100兲 system discussing energetic, structural, and are used to ensure an equivalent sampling of reciprocal
electronic properties. The corresponding results for space. The convergence with respect to k-point density of
O/Cu共110兲 are presented in Sec. III C. In Sec. IV we com- binding energies and free surface energies to below 0.01 eV
bine our data into thermodynamic 共p , T兲-phase diagrams to and 0.001 eV/ Å2, respectively, was earlier established by
facilitate comparison with experiment. Soon et al.61 using the same computational model of the Cu
surface.
Average binding energies per oxygen atom, EO b , are given
II. COMPUTATIONAL METHOD
relative to the clean surface and an isolated oxygen mol-
All calculations are performed using density-functional ecule. We calculate EO b as
theory 共DFT兲 in the generalized gradient approximation
共GGA; Perdew, Burke, and
exchange-correlation兲58 as implemented in the DMol3
Ernzerhof EO
b =−
1
NO
冉slab
EO/Cu slab
− ECu − ⌬NCuECu −
NO
2
E O2 , 冊 共1兲
software.59 The electronic eigenfunctions are expanded in where NO is the number of adsorbed oxygen atoms, EO/Cu slab
is
terms of a localized atomic orbital basis set of double nu- the total energy of the adsorbate-substrate system, EO2 is the
merical plus polarization 共DNP兲 quality and a real-space cut- energy of an isolated oxygen molecule 共see below兲, and ECu slab
off of 9 Bohr. Our calculations include scalar-relativistic cor- is the energy of the clean surface. ⌬NCu is the difference in
rections. A thermal broadening of 0.1 eV is applied to the number of Cu atoms between the O/Cu system and the
improve the convergence of the self-consistent procedure. clean surface slab, and ECu is the energy of a Cu atom in bulk
For bulk copper, we use a 12⫻ 12⫻ 12 Monkhorst-Pack Cu. The term ⌬NCuECu accounts for differences in the num-
grid to integrate over the Brillouin zone of the elemental ber of Cu atoms, when we compare oxygen adsorption be-
fcc-unit cell and obtain a calculated lattice constant of tween clean, missing-row, and added-row reconstructions.
3.64 Å, in good agreement with experiment 共3.61 Å兲.60 The Average binding energies are defined such that a positive
calculated bulk modulus and cohesive energy are 136 GPa value indicates a thermodynamically favorable adsorption
and 3.45 eV, respectively; also in good agreement with the process.
experimental values of 137 GPa and 3.49 eV.60 The energies of an oxygen molecule 共EO2兲 and an isolated
Periodic slabs are used to model the surfaces of copper.
oxygen atom are obtained from spin-polarized calculations
The Cu共100兲 slab is composed of 9 atomic layers with an
where we use a real-space basis set cutoff of 20 Bohr. Using
approximate thickness of 14.6 Å. The Cu共110兲 surface is
these two energies, we calculate the molecular binding en-
represented using a slab of 11 atomic layers which is ap-
ergy of an oxygen molecule to be 6.08 eV 共or 3.04 eV per
proximately 13.0 Å thick. Successive slabs in the three-
atom兲, somewhat larger than the experimental value of 5.12
dimensionally repeated unit cell are separated by a large
eV 共or 2.56 eV per atom兲. Our overestimation of the O2
vacuum region of ⬇30 Å. In all our calculations, oxygen
binding energy is inline with previous studies that use DFT
atoms are adsorbed on both surfaces of the slab in order to
in the GGA approximation.47,62 For the molecular bond
preserve inversion symmetry. In our geometry optimizations,
length and the vibrational frequency we obtain 1.22 Å and
three atomic layers at the center of the slab are held fixed at
1544 cm−1, respectively, in good agreement with the experi-
the calculated bulk positions. All other atoms are fully re-
mental values of 1.21 Å and 1580 cm−1 共Ref. 63兲.
laxed until all force components acting on the atoms are
The effect of the gaseous environment on the relative sta-
below 0.015 eV/ Å. Test calculations using larger slabs have
bility of the considered surface structures is captured by the
confirmed that the resultant error to the average oxygen bind-
method of ab initio atomistic thermodynamics.11,55,56 The
ing energy and the Gibbs free surface energy 共see definitions
availability of oxygen from the environment is represented
below兲 are smaller than 0.01 eV and 0.001 eV/ Å2, respec-
by the oxygen chemical potential, O, which is a function of
tively.
the gas-phase temperature and the oxygen partial pressure,
Several surface supercells are used to study the effects of
pO2. For a given O共pO2 , T兲, the thermodynamically pre-
oxygen coverage, ⌰, on the electronic and geometric struc-
ture of the surface. For the Cu共100兲 surface we consider ferred surface is the one with the lowest Gibbs free energy ␥
coverages of between 1/8 and 1 ML, using 共1 ⫻ 1兲, 共2 ⫻ 2兲, which we calculate as
共4 ⫻ 4兲, 共2冑2 ⫻ 冑2兲R45°, 共2冑2 ⫻ 2冑2兲R45°, and c共4 ⫻ 6兲 sur- 1
face unit cells. For the large c共4 ⫻ 6兲 unit cell, computational ⌬␥ = 共Gslab − GCu
slab
− ⌬NCuCu − NOO兲. 共2兲
2A O/Cu
restrictions necessitated a thinner, five-layer slab, as opposed
to the regular nine-layer slab. This increases for this structure In this equation, ⌬␥ is the surface Gibbs free energy rela-
the error in the average oxygen binding energy and the Gibbs tive to the oxygen-free, nonreconstructed surface. The calcu-
free surface energy to smaller than 0.03 eV and lated Gibbs free energies of the oxygenated and the oxygen-
075430-2
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF OXYGEN ON Cu共100兲… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
free slab model used to represent the surface are denoted, both surfaces and compare our calculated interlayer spacings
slab
GO/Cu slab
and GCu , respectively. The term ⌬NCuCu represents with previously reported values. In the following, interlayer
the cost of exchanging Cu atoms with a reservoir with separations near the surface are given as percent changes ⌬ij
chemical potential Cu. In our case, this reservoir is bulk relative to the respective bulk separations of 1.82 and
copper with which the surface is assumed to be in equilib- 1.30 Å in the 具100典 and 具110典 directions. For the Cu共100兲
rium; thus, Cu equals the free energy of a copper atom in surface, the change between the first and second atomic layer
bulk. In Eq. 共2兲, the factor 2A 1
is the reciprocal of the total 共this is denoted ⌬12兲 is calculated to be −2.3%, correspond-
共in-plane兲 surface area of the slab model 共i.e., the sum of ing to a small contraction relative to bulk. Between the sec-
both sides兲. The factor serves to normalize to a common unit ond and third layer the change is ⌬23 = +1.0%. These values
area the surface free energies of slabs of varying unit cells. are in good agreement with previous DFT-GGA
In our calculations, we neglect in GO/Cuslab
and GCuslab
the free calculations65 that report ⌬12 = −2.6% and ⌬23 = +0.9% and
energy contributions due to vibrational motion and the experimental LEED data68,69 with ⌬12 = −2.1% and ⌬23 =
pressure-volume term.56 This allows us to replace these +0.5%. For the Cu共110兲 surface, we obtain ⌬12 = −10.0% and
terms with the respective DFT total energies, EO/Cu slab
and ECuslab
. ⌬23 = +3.0%, consistent with the experimental values of ⌬12
It is convenient to combine Eqs. 共1兲 and 共2兲 to obtain the = −10.0⫾ 2.5% and ⌬23 = 0.0⫾ 2.5% 共Ref. 66兲, and theoreti-
surface free energy in terms of the average oxygen binding cal results using the linearized augmented plane wave
energy, i.e., 共FLAPW兲 method,67 yielding ⌬12 = −9.7% and ⌬23 = +3.6%.
Our calculated work functions for clean Cu共100兲 and
1 Cu共110兲 surfaces are 4.39 and 4.18 eV, respectively, which
⌬␥ ⬇ b − NO⌬O兲,
共− NOEO 共3兲
2A are in reasonable agreement with the experimental values of
4.59 and 4.48 eV.64 Earlier theoretical results include those
In this equation, ⌬O denotes the chemical potential of Skriver and Rosengaard71 who calculated values of 5.26
given relative to the dissociation energy EO2 of an isolated and 4.48 eV using linear muffin-tin orbitals and the local
O2 molecule, i.e., we define density approximation 共LDA兲. Tao et al.65 report a work
1 function of 4.49 eV for Cu共100兲 using DFT-GGA in good
⌬ O = O − E O2 . 共4兲 agreement with our value of 4.39 eV. We note that the work
2
functions of metal surfaces are usually underestimated by
In our electronic structure analysis, we consider electron DFT-GGA calculations.67
density differences Our calculated surface energies for Cu共100兲 and Cu共110兲
are 0.64 and 0.97 eV per surface unit cell, respectively.
n⌬共r兲 = nO/Cu共r兲 − nCu共r兲 − nO共r兲, 共5兲 These results correlate well with the FLAPW calculations of
where n O/Cu
共r兲 is the total electron density of the substrate- Da Silva et al.72,73 reporting surface energies of 0.60 eV for
adsorbate system, and nCu共r兲 and nO共r兲 are the electron den- Cu共100兲 and 0.90 eV for Cu共110兲. The more approximate
sities of the clean substrate and the isolated O ad-layer, re- LDA muffin tin calculations of Skriver and Roosengard71
spectively. The density difference is evaluated and plotted for yield 0.85 and 1.33 eV, respectively.
the relaxed adsorbate system, which highlights those regions
near the surface where oxygen adsorption induces a deple-
B. Oxygen adsorption on Cu(100)
tion or accumulation of the electron density.
The surface dipole moment 共in Debye兲 is evaluated using Cu sublattices and O binding sites. We examine oxygen
the Helmholtz equation adsorption on three types of Cu共100兲 surface structures 共Fig.
1兲. The first structure is the simple, nonreconstructed
A⌬⌽ Cu共100兲 surface shown in Fig. 1共a兲 which defines the
= , 共6兲
12⌰ 共1 ⫻ 1兲 surface unit cell of this crystal face. On this surface
there are three distinct high-symmetry adsorption sites: The
where A is the area 共in Å2兲 of a 共1 ⫻ 1兲 surface unit, and ⌬⌽
top site 共T兲 is located directly on top of a surface Cu atom,
is the work-function change 共in eV兲 relative to the clean
the bridge site 共B兲 is a twofold coordinated site between two
surface. The work function is defined as the difference be-
Cu atoms, and the hollow site 共H兲 is coordinated by four Cu
tween the electrostatic potential 共U兲 in the middle of the
atoms. The second surface structure 关Fig. 1共b兲兴 is a missing-
vacuum region and the Fermi energy 共EF兲, so that,
row reconstruction with a 共2冑2 ⫻ 冑2兲R45° unit
⌬⌽ = U − EF − ⌽clean , 共7兲 cell,14,16,19,20,23 which features a chain of Cu atom vacancies
in the 关011兴 direction. On this reconstruction the most favor-
where ⌽clean is the work function of the clean surface. able adsorption site is the pseudohollow site 共pH兲, which is
similar to the hollow site on the clean surface, but only three-
III. RESULTS fold coordinated due to the missing row of Cu atoms. The
third structure prototype is the distributed vacancy recon-
A. Clean Cu(100) and Cu(110) surfaces
struction 共not shown in Fig. 1兲, which is closely related to the
The clean Cu共100兲 and Cu共110兲 surfaces are well charac- missing-row reconstruction, but is characterized by a nonor-
terized experimentally and theoretically in the literature.64–70 dered, random distribution of Cu vacancies in the surface.
As a point of reference, we relax the atomic positions for The importance of the vacancy order/disorder transition was
075430-3
DUAN et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-4
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF OXYGEN ON Cu共100兲… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
TABLE I. Calculated structural parameters for different O coverage 共from 1/8 to 1 ML兲 on Cu共100兲 in the
hollow site. The values of oxygen adsorbed on the missing-row 共MR兲 reconstructed surface for 1/4 and 1/2
ML are included for comparison. The binding energy, EO b , is calculated with respect to the isolated oxygen
molecule. dCu-O indicates the average bond length between oxygen and the nearest copper atom. dO1 is the
minimum vertical height of O with respect to the surface Cu layer, ⌬ij 共i = 1 , 3 , j = 2 , 4兲 represents percent
change relative to the bulk interlayer spacing, between the ith and jth atomic interlayer, where the center-
of-mass of the layer is used. Also given are the workfunction change, ⌬⌽, and the corresponding surface
dipole moment, .
reduced oxygen coverage 共1/4 ML兲 is created using a same coverage 共see Fig. 2兲. For 1/4 ML coverage, the aver-
doubled unit cell, MR-共4冑2 ⫻ 2冑2兲R45°, in which only half age oxygen binding energy of the missing-row 共4冑2
of the pseudohollow sites are occupied by oxygen. Missing- ⫻ 2冑2兲R45° structure is 0.36 eV less stable, suggesting that
row structures with increased coverage 共3/4 and 1 ML兲 are a missing-row reconstruction is not preferred at this low cov-
created in the 共2冑2 ⫻ 冑2兲R45° unit cell by placing additional erage. However, this preference reverses when we consider
oxygen atoms into subsurface tetrahedral or octahedral sites. higher coverages. At 1/2 ML, we find for the MR-共2冑2
The in-plane position of the subsurface sites are labeled as ⫻ 冑2兲R45° structure an oxygen binding energy that is 0.11
shown in Fig. 1共b兲 where sT1 and sT2 are tetrahedral sites, eV more favorable than that of the N-c共2 ⫻ 2兲 structure. For
and sO1 and sO2 are octahedral sites. For 3/4 ML coverage, 3/4 and 1 ML oxygen coverages, the missing-row reconstruc-
two reconstructions were considered: The tetrahedral recon- tions are also more stable than the nonreconstructed Cu共100兲
struction contains oxygen at the sT1 subsurface site, and the surface; however, the average oxygen binding energies are
octahedral reconstruction has one oxygen at the sO1 site. We somewhat smaller relative to the 1/2 ML case, probably due
also construct tetrahedral and octahedral subsurface recon- to the less favorable subsurface oxygen binding sites in-
structions for 1 ML coverage. The tetrahedral reconstruction volved. Overall, our results are consistent with the STM ex-
has two oxygen atoms at two sT2 subsurface sites, the octa- periments of Fujita et al.23 who report a 共2冑2 ⫻ 冑2兲R45°
hedral reconstructions has one oxygen atom each at sO1 and missing-row phase only for higher coverages.
sO2 sites. Iddir et al.33 recently made the convincing argument that
We now compare the energetics of the missing-row recon- the experimentally observed 共2冑2 ⫻ 冑2兲R45° to c共2 ⫻ 2兲
structions to those of the nonreconstructed surface at the transition at 475 K is due to an order-disorder phase transi-
tion involving the Cu vacancies that make up the missing
row. They propose that above 475 K, the vacancies in the Cu
sublattice become disordered, such that the apparent symme-
try in the diffraction is determined by the 1/2 ML oxygen
sublattice with a c共2 ⫻ 2兲 unit cell.
In our calculation, we use the same 1/2 ML disordered
vacancy 共DV兲 structure 关Fig. 3共c兲兴 that Iddir et al.33 employ
to represent this surface 共referred to as a “spaced vacancy
structure” in Ref. 33兲. This structure has a 共2冑2
FIG. 3. 共Color online兲 Top views of the favorable oxygen ad-
⫻ 2冑2兲R45° unit cell and arises by shifting every other Cu
sorption structures on Cu共100兲: 共a兲 1/4 ML oxygen coverage on a atom from a complete row into the missing row, thereby
nonreconstructed surface with a 共2 ⫻ 2兲 unit cell, 共b兲 the missing effectively creating a surface with two half-missing rows.
row 共2冑2 ⫻ 冑2兲R45° reconstruction with 1/2 ML coverage, and 共c兲 The calculated average oxygen binding energy for this struc-
the “disordered vacancy” 共2冑2 ⫻ 2冑2兲R45° structure that becomes ture is 1.78 eV, which is 0.02 eV less than for the missing-
stable at high temperature due to configurational entropy. Large row structure with ordered Cu vacancies. The energy differ-
white and gray spheres represent top layer Cu atoms and underlying ence per Cu vacancy is 0.058 eV, from which we can
substrate Cu atoms, respectively. Black 共red兲 spheres represent O estimate, via the configurational entropy 共see Ref. 33 for de-
atoms. The rectangles 共blue兲 indicate the supercells used in the tails兲, a transition temperature of 300 K between the ordered
calculations. MR-共2冑2 ⫻ 冑2兲R45° and the quasi-disordered 共2冑2
075430-5
DUAN et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-6
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF OXYGEN ON Cu共100兲… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-7
DUAN et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-8
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF OXYGEN ON Cu共100兲… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-9
DUAN et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-10
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF OXYGEN ON Cu共100兲… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-11
DUAN et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-12
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF OXYGEN ON Cu共100兲… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-13
DUAN et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
*Present address: Department of Physics, Ningbo University, Foster, T. Kangas, and K. Laasonen, Catal. Today 100, 403
Ningbo 315211, China. 共2005兲.
† 31
o.warschkow@physics.usyd.edu.au N. Bonini, A. Kokalj, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, and S.
1 A. Guerrero-Ruiz, L. Rodriguez-Ramos, and J. L. G. Fierro, Baroni, Surf. Sci. 600, 5074 共2006兲.
Appl. Catal. 72, 119 共1991兲. 32 M. J. Harrison, D. P. Woodruff, J. Robinson, D. Sander, W. Pan,
2
G. Centi and S. Perathoner, Appl. Catal. 132, 179 共1995兲. and J. Kirschner, Phys. Rev. B 74, 165402 共2006兲.
3 33
P. J. Godowski, J. Onsgaard, A. Gagor, M. Kondys, and Z. S. Li, H. Iddir, D. D. Fong, P. Zapol, P. H. Fuoss, L. A. Curtiss, G.-W.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 406, 441 共2005兲. Zhou, and J. A. Eastman, Phys. Rev. B 76, 241404共R兲 共2007兲.
4 M. Brandhorst, J. Zajac, D. J. Jones, J. Roziére, M. Womes, A. 34 S. Jaatinen, M. Rusanen, and P. Salo, Surf. Sci. 601, 1813
Catal. Lett. 74, 115 共2001兲. 38 R. A. DiDio, D. M. Zehner, and E. W. Plummer, J. Vac. Sci.
7
C. Fukuhara, H. Ohkura, Y. Kamata, Y. Murakami, and A. Iga- Technol. A 2, 852 共1984兲.
rashi, Appl. Catal., A 273, 125 共2004兲. 39 F. M. Chua, Y. Kuk, and P. J. Silverman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63,
8
A. Atkinson, S. Barnett, R. J. Gorte, J. T. S. Irvine, A. J. McE- 386 共1989兲.
40
voy, M. Mogensen, S. C. Singhal, and J. Vohs, Nature Mater. 3, F. Jensen, F. Besenbacher, E. Læsgaard, and I. Stensgaard, Phys.
17 共2004兲. Rev. B 41, 10233 共1990兲.
9 F. Luck, Catal. Today 27, 195 共1996兲. 41 D. J. Coulman, J. Wintterlin, R. J. Behm, and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev.
10 C. Stampfl, M. V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, K. Reuter, and M. Schef-
Lett. 64, 1761 共1990兲.
fler, Surf. Sci. 500, 368 共2002兲. 42 R. Feidenhans’l, F. Grey, R. L. Johnson, S. G. J. Mochrie, J.
11 C. Stampfl, Catal. Today 105, 17 共2005兲.
Bohr, and M. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. B 41, 5420 共1990兲.
12
M. Wuttig, R. Franchy, and H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. 213, 103 共1989兲. 43
S. R. Parkin, H. C. Zeng, M. Y. Zhou, and K. A. R. Mitchell,
13 H. C. Zeng, R. A. MacFarlane, and K. A. R. Mitchell, Surf. Sci.
Phys. Rev. B 41, 5432 共1990兲.
208, L7 共1989兲. 44
L. Ruan, F. Besenbacher, I. Stensgaard, and E. Laegsgaard, Phys.
14 M. Wuttig, R. Franchy, and H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. 224, L979
Rev. Lett. 70, 4079 共1993兲.
共1989兲. 45
J. Buisset, H.-P. Rust, E. K. Schweizer, L. Cramer, and A. M.
15 K. W. Jacobsen and J. K. Nørskov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1788
Bradshaw, Surf. Sci. 349, L147 共1996兲.
共1990兲. 46 F. Frechard and R. A. van Santen, Surf. Sci. 407, 200 共1998兲.
16 47
F. Jensen, F. Besenbacher, E. Lægsgaard, and I. Stensgaard, Y. S. Liem, G. Kresse, and J. H. R. Clarke, Surf. Sci. 415, 194
Phys. Rev. B 42, 9206 共1990兲. 共1998兲.
17 I. K. Robinson, E. Vlieg, and S. Ferrer, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6954 48 Y. Uehara, T. Matsumoto, and S. Ushioda, Phys. Rev. B 66,
共1991兲. 共2008兲.
19
M. Sotto, Surf. Sci. 260, 235 共1992兲. 50
R. Feidenhans’l, F. Grey, M. Nielsen, F. Besenbacher, F. Jensen,
20 F. Besenbacher and J. K. Nørskov, Prog. Surf. Sci. 44, 5 共1993兲.
E. Laegsgaard, I. Stensgaard, K. W. Jacobsen, J. K. Nørskov,
21 T. Lederer, D. Arvanitis, G. Comelli, L. Tröger, and K. Baber-
and R. L. Johnson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2027 共1990兲.
schke, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15390 共1993兲. 51 R. Feidenhans’l, F. Grey, R. L. Johnson, and M. Nielsen, Phys.
22
W. Liu, K. C. Wong, H. C. Zeng, and K. A. R. Mitchell, Prog. Rev. B 44, 1875 共1991兲.
Surf. Sci. 50, 247 共1995兲. 52
G. Dorenbos, M. Breeman, and D. O. Boerma, Phys. Rev. B 47,
23 T. Fujita, Y. Okawa, Y. Matsumoto, and K.-I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev.
1580 共1993兲.
B 54, 2167 共1996兲. 53
L. D. Sun, M. Hohage, and P. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. B 69,
24 M. Kittel, M. Polcik, R. Terborg, J. T. Hoeft, P. Baumgärtel, A.
045407 共2004兲.
54
M. Bradshaw, R. L. Toomes, J.-H. Kang, D. P. Woodruff, M. L. D. Sun, M. Hohage, R. Denk, and P. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. B
Pascal, C. L. A. Lamont, and E. Rotenberg, Surf. Sci. 470, 311 76, 245412 共2007兲.
共2001兲. 55
W. X. Li, C. Stampfl, and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. B 68, 165412
25 S. Stolbov and T. S. Rahman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 116101
共2003兲.
共2002兲. 56
K. Reuter, C. Stampfl, and M. Scheffler, Handbook of Materials
26 S. Stolbov, A. Kara, and T. S. Rahman, Phys. Rev. B 66, 245405
Modeling 共Springer, Berlin, 2005兲, Vol. 1.
共2002兲. 57
A. Soon, M. Todorova, B. Delley, and C. Stampfl, Phys. Rev. B
27 I. Merrick, J. E. Inglesfield, and H. Ishida, Surf. Sci. 551, 158
73, 165424 共2006兲.
共2004兲. 58 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77,
28 M. Alatalo, S. Jaatinen, P. Salo, and K. Laasonen, Phys. Rev. B
3865 共1996兲.
70, 245417 共2004兲. 59
B. Delley, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 7756 共2000兲; 92, 508 共1990兲.
29 T. Kangas, K. Laasonen, A. Puisti, H. Pitkänen, and M. Alatalo, 60 C. Kittel, Introduction of Solid State Physics 共Wiley, New York,
075430-14
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF OXYGEN ON Cu共100兲… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 81, 075430 共2010兲
075430-15