Ellison and Boyd 2013

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Ellison and Boyd (2013) defined social networking sites as “a networked

communication platform in which participants have uniquely identifiable


profiles that consist of user-supplied content, content provided by other users,
and/or system-level data can publicly articulate connections that can be
viewed and traversed by others; and can consume, produce, and/or interact
with streams of user-generated content provided by their connections on the
site. This definition emphasizes three defining features of social networking
sites.

First, social networking sites allow users to create uniquely identifiable


profiles animated by both user- and system-supplied information. Examples
of these user- and system-supplied information that define a user’s profile on
social networking sites include biographic details, self-descriptions, photos,
interests and activities (Ellison & Boyd, 2013). These pieces of information
facilitate online peer-to-peer networking by revealing users’ identities (Kane et
al., 2014; Zhang & Leung, 2015). Second, social networking sites allow users to
articulate connections that can be viewed and traversed by others. These
connections are typically manifested in the form of friends lists, followers lists,
group memberships, liked pages and so on. These publicly stated connections
enable users to discern other users’ social connections, further facilitating
peer-to-peer networking activities on the platforms (Ellison & Boyd, 2013).
Zhang and Leung (2015) maintained that the ability to traverse and view other
users’ connections and activities is an innovative feature of social networking
sites that is virtually unknown in traditional forms of communication. Finally,
social networking sites allow users to consume, produce and interact with the
streams of user-generated content provided by their connections (Kane et
al., 2014). Users create their content by combining text, images, videos,
emoticons, animations and so forth—all languages of social networking sites
(Dumpit & Fernandez, 2017). As well as sharing their own content, users can
consume and interact with other users’ content, by liking, sharing and
commenting on them, thereby creating a dynamic and continuous cycle of
online interaction and engagement, which is essential to the vitality of social
networking sites (Masrom et al., 2021; Smith, 2017).
College students rely heavily on social networking sites for their daily
communication, entertainment and information needs (Ansari & Khan, 2020;
Doleck et al., 2018; Ifinedo, 2016; Lemay et al., 2020). Studies tracking college
students’ social media habits have indicated that students spend a significant
amount of time daily, switching between multiple social networking sites such
as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Snapchat (Alhabash &
Ma, 2017; Dumpit & Fernandez, 2017; Felisoni & Godoi, 2018; Smith, 2017;
Wang et al., 2015). College students use social networking sites for various
purposes including opinion sharing, information acquisition, entertainment,
self-documentation, self-expression and social interactions, among others
(Alhabash & Ma, 2017; Chawinga, 2017; Lemay et al., 2020). Educational use
of social networking sites, such as accessing course information, organizing
group work, receiving feedback and interacting with instructors, have also
been noted in the literature (Al-Qaysi et al., 2021; Al-Rahmi et al., 2020;
Ansari & Khan, 2020; Hoi, 2021; Raza et al., 2020; Smith, 2017).

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy