M0004 Datafile
M0004 Datafile
M0004 Datafile
PARETO TABLE
No. of Failures % Cumulative
PARETO ANALYSIS OF WIRE FAILURE
Cause due to this Contribution % 120.00
cause
100.00
BW 359 45.39 45.39
80.00
CCF 141 17.83 63.21
Rough 136 17.19 80.40 60.00
Frequency (Nos)
35
1.3845 - 1.3875 1.386 2 1.67 30
1.3875 - 1.3905 1.389 14 11.67 25
20
1.3905 - 1.3935 1.392 18 15.00 15
1.3935 - 1.3965 1.395 47 39.17 10
5
1.3965 - 1.3995 1.398 33 27.50 0
1.3995 - 1.4025 1.401 5 4.17 1.383 1.386 1.389 1.392 1.395 1.398 1.401
Diameter (mm)
TOTAL : 120
DIAMETER
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
16 54 3 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.16
17 82 8 0.10 0.00 0.06 0.14
Sample No.
18 67 3 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.15 Fraction Defective (p) LCL(p) UCL(p) CL(p)
19 18 0 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.23
20 52 4 0.08 0.00 0.06 0.16
21 72 6 0.08 0.00 0.06 0.14
22 96 0 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.13
N D pbar
Totals 3624 218 0.06
CL(p)
17
18
19
20
CL(p)
21
22
np-Chart
Sample Number of
4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
c-Chart
Sample No. of
Sample No: Size (n) Defects, c LCL( c ) CL( c ) UCL( c )
1 1 9 0 4.86 11.48 Defects (c) Chart
2 1 12 0 4.86 11.48 16
3 1 7 0 4.86 11.48
4 1 7 0 4.86 11.48 14
5 1 8 0 4.86 11.48
6 1 14 0 4.86 11.48 12
7 1 3 0 4.86 11.48
8 1 5 0 4.86 11.48 10
No. of Defects
9 1 6 0 4.86 11.48
10 1 6 0 4.86 11.48 8
11 1 4 0 4.86 11.48
6
12 1 1 0 4.86 11.48
13 1 3 0 4.86 11.48 4
14 1 2 0 4.86 11.48
15 1 4 0 4.86 11.48 2
16 1 3 0 4.86 11.48
17 1 0 0 4.86 11.48 0
18 1 5 0 4.86 11.48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
19 1 1 0 4.86 11.48
20 1 2 0 4.86 11.48 Sample No.
No. of Defects, c LCL( c ) CL( c ) UCL(
21 1 4 0 4.86 11.48
22 1 1 0 4.86 11.48
N C cbar
Totals 22 107 4.86
CL( c ) UCL( c )
Xbar - Range Chart
Sample
Data (Sample Size, n = 4) Average, Sample
Sample No: Xbar Range, R LCL(R) CL(R) UCL(R) LCL(Xbar) CL(Xbar) UCL(Xbar)
0.5160
1 0.511 0.510 0.510 0.508 0.5098 0.0030 0.0000 0.0055 0.0126 0.5055 0.5096 0.5136 0.5140
Sa
DATA HOMOGENISATION AND CALCULATION OF CONTROL LIMITS
For n=4,
d2 = 2.059 D3 = 0.000
A2 = 0.729 D4 = 2.282
As the sample range is beyond control limits for sample No. 5, this sample is dropped.
Now, re-calculate Rbar, Xdbar, and control limits with the remaining 19 samples.
As all the 19 ranges fall within the new control limits, new Rbar value is accepted.
Data homogenisation is completed with this 2nd iteration. Use new control limits.
0.5120
0.5100
0.5080
0.5060
0.5040
0.5020
0.5000
0.4980
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Sample No.
Sample Average, Xbar LCL(Xbar) CL(Xbar)
UCL(Xbar)
Range Chart
0.0180
0.0160
0.0140
Sample Range (R)
0.0120
0.0100
0.0080
0.0060
0.0040
0.0020
0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Sample No.
Data (X)
4 1 3.86 0.09 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973
5 1 3.72 0.14 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 3.500
6 1 4.17 0.45 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 3.000
7 1 4.37 0.20 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 2.500
8 1 4.65 0.28 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 2.000
9 1 4.70 0.05 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Sam
1
10 1 4.35 0.35 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973
11 1 4.18 0.17 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 Data (X) LCL(X) CL(X)
12 1 4.76 0.58 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973
13 1 4.50 0.26 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973
14 1 4.20 0.30 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 Moving R
15 1 4.10 0.10 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 1.000
16 1 3.90 0.20 0 0.282 0.921 3.475 4.224 4.973 0.800
5 6 7 8 9 Sample
10 No.
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Sample No.
LCL(MR)
UCL(MR)