Nidhi Nep Assignment
Nidhi Nep Assignment
Compare and contrast: Analyse the key differences and similarities between the NEP 1986
and NEP 2020.
Evaluate effectiveness: Assess the effectiveness of both policies in achieving their stated
goals.
Identify challenges and opportunities: Analyse the challenges faced in implementing the
NEPs and identify potential opportunities for improvement.
Explore impact: Examine the impact of the NEPs on Indian education, including changes
in enrolment rates, quality of education, and equity.
INTRODUCTION
The Ministry of Human Resource Development formed a committee chaired by Dr K.
Kasturirangan for preparing the National Education Policy. The Committee was constituted
in June 2017. The Committee submitted its report on May 31, 2019.
Education is the backbone of the nation. To, improve the entire educational system, a strong,
well- planned and systematic education system is required. The National Policy on Education
covers elementary and university education in urban as well as rural India.
The very first policy for education was promulgated in 1968 with the second one following in
1986.
The first NPE was based on the recommendations of the Education Commission (1964-66). This
policy sought to have a ‘radical restructuring’ of India’s educational system and equalizing
opportunities for education for all, to accomplish national integration and better economic and
cultural development.
The NPE also called for realizing compulsory education for every child until the age of fourteen,
as mentioned in the Indian Constitution.
It also aimed at providing enhanced training and improving teachers’ qualifications.
The National Education Policy aims to restructure the regulation and governance of the Indian
education system to address (sustainable) developmental goals of the country. The general
objective of the National Education Policy is to create an equitable and inclusive education system
that can provide learning for all. The system has to equip all learners in India with foundational
literacy and numeracy, a ‘light but tight’ regulatory framework to ensure integrity and resource
efficiency of the system, promotion of Indian culture and traditions, and a focus on
multilingualism and respect for the diversity of local contexts. The policy aims to promote the role
of teachers in Indian society and culture and to develop foundational capacities (e.g. literacy and
numeracy) in pupils, as well as social, ethical, emotional, and critical-thinking capacities in all
learners.
The concept of lifelong learning in the Indian policy is connected to the development of
foundational skills and competences that allow its citizens to participate in society, reducing socio-
cultural disadvantages and unemployment. The policy mentions the necessity of fostering lifelong
learning activities at all educational levels and proposes to create an adult education curriculum
framework to develop skills and competences in the adult population.
The NPE of 1986 had a significant impact on Indian education. It laid the foundation for
several reforms, including:
While the NPE of 1986 was a landmark policy, it also faced criticisms. Some critics argued
that the policy was overly ambitious and that its implementation was slow. Additionally,
some concerns were raised about the quality of education provided under the NPE.
Despite these criticisms, the NPE of 1986 remains a significant milestone in the history of
Indian education. It laid the groundwork for subsequent education policies and reforms, and
its influence can still be seen in the Indian education system today.
NEP 2020 OVERVIEW
The National Education Policy (NEP) of 2020 is a comprehensive framework designed to
revolutionize India's education system. It outlines the goals, objectives, and strategies for
achieving quality education for all. The NEP aims to create a holistic, student-centric, and
equitable education system that prepares learners for the 21st century.
Holistic Development: The NEP emphasizes the development of the whole child,
focusing on not just academic achievement but also physical, social, emotional, and
cognitive skills.
Equity and Inclusion: The policy aims to ensure that all students, regardless of their
background, have equal access to quality education.
Student-Centric Learning: The NEP shifts the focus from teacher-centric to student-
centric learning, empowering students to take ownership of their education.
Flexibility and Choice: The policy promotes flexibility in curriculum and
assessment, allowing students to choose subjects and pathways that align with their
interests and aspirations.
Technology Integration: The NEP recognizes the importance of technology in
education and aims to integrate it seamlessly into the learning process.
The NEP has the potential to significantly impact the education landscape in India. It aims to
create a more equitable, inclusive, and student-centric education system that prepares learners
for the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century. However, successful implementation
of the NEP will require substantial investment, policy coherence, and effective
implementation strategies.
Funding: The NEP requires significant investment to implement its various reforms.
Ensuring adequate funding will be crucial for its success.
Teacher Training: Upgrading the quality of teacher education will be essential for
implementing the NEP's vision of student-centric learning.
Infrastructure: Building and upgrading educational infrastructure, especially in rural
areas, will be necessary to provide access to quality education for all.
Equity: Addressing disparities in education access and outcomes for marginalized
groups will be a key challenge.
Technology Integration: Ensuring equitable access to technology and training
teachers to use it effectively will be important for implementing the NEP's vision.
Despite these challenges, the NEP presents a significant opportunity to transform India's
education system. By implementing its reforms effectively, India can create a world-class
education system that empowers its citizens and contributes to its economic and social
development.
COMPARISON OF BOTH
POLICIES
NPE 1986 focused on 10 + 2 format whereas NEP 2020 focuses on 5 + 3 + 3 + 4 Format.
Under NPE there are 2 age groups 6 to 16 and 16 to 18 whereas in NEP there are 4 age
groups 3 to 8, 8 to 11, 12 to 14 and 14 to 18. Exams as per NPE 1986 policy were to be held
on a yearly basis that too in descriptive form once a year but in NEP 2020 exams will be held
twice a year in the form of objective and descriptive papers, and the new syllabus is also
divided into 2 parts.
Curriculum in NEP 1986 is reduced where the focus is on essential subject paths in order to
develop qualitative education in students but this is not the same in NPE 2020 policy where
all the quality is to be maintained but the burden is also much on students. NPE 1986 didn’t
have any vocational subject as a mandatory part of the curriculum but NEP 2020 has
compulsory one vocational subject from classes 6 to 8 which students have to study as a
compulsion. Here the main focus is to build skills in students which are enhanced by
vocational subjects.
NEP 2020 has a preparatory class that is Bal-Vatika for children below 5 years, which is
conducted by ECCE qualified teachers but it is not so in NPE 1986 format in fact no such
provision is there. The preparatory stage covered age groups of 8 till 11 years as per NEP this
is included in classes from 3rd to 5th, this stage covered activity-based pedagogy and
curriculum style for the foundational stage this focus basically on discussion method, an
experimental method so that students learn the practicality of the subjects but NPE does not
follow any of these things.
From the classes 6 till 8 which is included in the middle stage of NEP covering the age
groups of 12 to 14 years these 3 years are the foundational stage of building pedagogy and
curriculum style 4 preparatory stages where students have detailed learning about subjects
like math, science, arts etc.
Where they enhance their skills in the particular subjects in order to have a great idea of those
subjects, they wish to pursue but under NPE it was compulsory to study each and every
subject with the student is willing or not willing to study for it does not look forward to the
practicality.
For higher education, NPE offered a one or 2-year diploma, 3-year graduation, 4-year
graduation with research but NEP offers a one-year diploma 2-year advanced diploma 3-year
graduation 4-year graduation with research. Not just this NEP has also changed with teaching
curriculum which has enhanced its practical approach. National Institute for Pali, Persian and
Prakrit, Indian Institute of Translation and Interpretation to be set up.
Teacher education:
4-year integrated B.Ed.: Minimum degree qualification for teaching that includes student
teaching at local schools. by 2030.
2-year B.Ed.: For applicants with an existing Bachelor's Degrees in other specialized subjects
1 year B.Ed.: For those who have completed the equivalent of 4-year multidisciplinary
Bachelor's Degrees or have obtained a Master's degree in a specialty.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, both the NEP 1986 and NEP 2020 have played crucial roles in shaping India's
education system. While the 1986 policy laid the foundation for universal education, the 2020 policy
aims to transform the education system to meet the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century.
The successful implementation of the NEP 2020 will be essential for realizing its ambitious goals and
ensuring a bright future for India's education system.
REFLECTION
The National Education Policies of 1986 and 2020 represent significant milestones in
India's educational journey. While both policies aimed to improve the quality and
accessibility of education, they reflect distinct approaches and priorities.
NEP 1986 laid the foundation for universalization and equity in education. It emphasized the
importance of providing education to all children and addressing inequalities. However, it
faced challenges in implementation and was criticized for its slow progress.
NEP 2020 builds upon the foundations laid by its predecessor but introduces a more
comprehensive and ambitious vision. It emphasizes holistic development, student-centric
learning, and the integration of technology in education. The 2020 policy also places greater
importance on early childhood education, vocational education, and assessment reforms.
Successful implementation of NEP 2020 will require concerted efforts from all stakeholders,
including the government, educational institutions, teachers, and students. It will also require
adequate funding, effective governance, and a commitment to continuous improvement.
REFERENCES
h ps://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2308622.pdf
h ps://sdmmmkmysore.in/department/commerce/shubhada/new%20educa on%20policy
%202020a%20compara ve%20analysis%20with%20exis ng%20na onal%20policy%20of%20
educa on%201986.pdf
h ps://ijsi.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/18.02.004.20220703.pdf