Ramanujan 2020 Edathua
Ramanujan 2020 Edathua
Ramanujan 2020 Edathua
Srinivasa Ramanujan
His life and his work
Michel Waldschmidt
Sorbonne University
Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu
http://www.imj-prg.fr/~michel.waldschmidt/
Abstract
http://beta.thehindu.com/education/article41732.ece
Biography of Srinivasa Ramanujan
√ √
x + y = 7, x+ y = 11
x = 9, y = 4.
Biography (continued)
Subrahmanyam scholarship
MacTutor History of Mathematics
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/
n
n
N
X 1 1 1 1 1
SN = = 1 + + + + ··· +
n=1
n 2 3 4 N
Z N Z N
dx dx
< SN < 1 +
1 x+1 1 x
γ = lim (S N − log N ).
N →∞
Reference
Jeffrey C. Lagarias
Euler’s constant: Euler’s work
and modern developments
Bulletin Amer. Math. Soc.
50 (2013), No. 4, 527–628.
arXiv:1303.1856 [math.NT]
Bibliography: 314 references.
http://eulerarchive.maa.org/
http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~euler/index/enestrom.html
http://www.eulerarchive.org/
1 3 1 1 11
H 1 = 1, H2 = 1 + = , H3 = 1 + + = ,
2 2 2 3 6
n
1 1 1 X1
Hn = 1 + + + · · · + = ·
2 3 n j=1
j
Sequence:
3 11 25 137 49 363 761 7129
1, , , , , , , , ,...
2 6 12 60 20 140 280 2520
The online encyclopaedia of integer sequences
https://oeis.org/
Neil J. A. Sloane
Numerators and denominators
Numerators: https://oeis.org/A001008
1, 3, 11, 25, 137, 49, 363, 761, 7129, 7381, 83711, 86021, 1145993,
Moreover,
∞
X ζ(m)
γ= (−1)m ·
m=2
m
Riemann zeta function
X 1
ζ(s)=
n≥1
ns
Y 1
=
p
1 − p−s
Euler: s ∈ R. Riemann: s ∈ C.
Numerical value of Euler’s constant
γ = 0, 577 215 664 901 532 860 606 512 090 082 402 431 042 . . .
Euler constant
Euler–Mascheroni constant
1 1 1
γ = lim 1 + + + · · · + − log n = 0.577 215 664 9 . . .
n→∞ 2 3 n
B 0 + 4B 1 + 6B 2 + 4B 3 = 0 B3 =0
1
B 0 + 5B 1 + 10B 2 + 10B 3 + 5B 4 = 0 B4 = −
30
..
.
s r
√
q
6+2 7 + 3 8 + 4 9 + · · · =?
Answers from Ramanujan
s r
√
q
1+2 1 + 3 1 + 4 1 + ··· = 3
s r
√
q
6+2 7 + 3 8 + 4 9 + ··· = 4
“Proofs” n(n + 2)
(n + 2)2 = 1 + (n + 1)(n + 3)
p
n(n + 2) = n 1 + (n + 1)(n + 3)
f (n) = n(n + 2)
p
f (n) = n 1 + f (n + 1)
q p
f (n) = n 1 + (n + 1) 1 + f (n + 2)
“Proofs” n(n + 3)
(n + 3)2 = n + 5 + (n + 1)(n + 4)
p
n(n + 3) = n n + 5 + (n + 1)(n + 4)
g(n) = n(n + 3)
p
g(n) = n n + 5 + g(n + 1)
q p
g(n) = n n + 5 + (n + 1) n + 6 + g(n + 2)
Letter of S. Ramanujan to M.J.M. Hill in 1912
1
1 + 2 + 3 + ··· + ∞ = −
12
12 + 22 + 32 + · · · + ∞2 = 0
1
13 + 23 + 33 + · · · + ∞3 =
120
Answer of M.J.M. Hill in 1912
1
1 + 2 + 3 + · · · + n = n(n + 1)
2
n(2n + 1)(n + 1)
12 + 22 + 32 + · · · + n2 =
6
2
3 3 3 3 n(n + 1)
1 + 2 + 3 + ··· + n =
2
Renormalisation of divergent series
Leonhard Euler
(1707 – 1783)
(1748)
Euler
Values of Riemann zeta function at negative integers :
B k+1
ζ(−k) = − (n ≥ 1)
k+1
1
ζ(−1) = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · = −
12
1
ζ(−3) = 13 + 23 + 33 + 43 + · · · =
120
1
ζ(−5) = 15 + 25 + 35 + 45 + · · · = −
252
G.H. Hardy: Divergent Series (1949)
1
1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + ··· =
4
1 − 1! + 2! − 3! + · · · = .596 · · ·
Answer from Hardy
(February 8, 1913)
I was exceedingly interested by your letter and by the theorems
which you state. You will however understand that, before I
can judge properly of the value of what you have done, it is
essential that I should see proofs of some of your assertions.
Your results seem to me to fall into roughly three classes:
(2) there are results which, so far as I know, are new and
interesting, but interesting rather from their curiosity and
apparent difficulty than their importance;
Srinivasa Ramanujan
Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis 1887 – 1920
1893 – 1972
http://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Mahalanobis.html
https://www.math.auckland.ac.nz/~butcher/miniature/miniature2.pdf
Balancing numbers
Answer: house number 204 in a street with 288 houses.
Sequence of balancing numbers (number of the house)
https://oeis.org/A001109
http://www.drnarendrajadhav.info
Ramanujan – Taxi Cab Number 1729
50 = 72 + 12 = 52 + 52
x3 + y 3 + z 3 = w 3
(x, y, z, w) = (3, 4, 5, 6)
33 + 43 + 53 = 27 + 64 + 125 = 216 = 63
Parametric solution:
x = 3a2 + 5ab − 5b2 y = 4a2 − 4ab + 6b2
z = 5a2 − 5ab − 3b2 w = 6a2 − 4ab + 4b2
Ramanujan – Nagell Equation
Trygve Nagell (1895 – 1988)
x2 + 7 = 2n
12 + 7 = 23 = 8
32 + 7 = 24 = 16
52 + 7 = 25 = 32
112 + 7 = 27 = 128
1812 + 7 = 215 = 32 768
x2 + D = 2n
1 p(1) = 1
2 = 1+1 p(2) = 2
3 = 2+1=1+1+1 p(3) = 3
4 = 3+1=2+2=2+1+1
= 1+1+1+1 p(4) = 5
p(5n + 4) is a multiple of 5
p(7n + 5) is a multiple of 7
p(11n + 6) is a multiple of 11
S. Chowla, . ”Congruence
Properties of Partitions.” J.
London Math. Soc. 9, 247, 1934.
https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-9.4.247a
Sarvadaman Chowla
(1907–1995)
Partitions - Ken Ono
1
=
(1 − x)(1 − x2 )(1 − x3 ) · · · (1 − xn ) · · ·
∞
X ∞
Y
1+ n
p(n)x = (1 − xn )−1
n=1 n=1
Eulerian products
Riemann zeta function
For s > 1,
∞
X 1 Y
−s −1
ζ(s) = = 1 − p
n=1
ns p
∞
Y ∞
X
n 24
x (1 − x ) = τ (n)xn .
n=1 n=1
∞
X τ (n) Y −1
= 1 − τ (p)p−s + p11−2s
n=1
ns p
Ramanujan’s Congruences
Ramanujan’s Conjecture,
proved by Deligne in 1974
A (x) = n ≤ x ; (1 − ) log log n < ω(n) < (1 + ) log log n .
1
A (x) → 1 when x → ∞.
x
Highly composite numbers
(Proc. London Math. Soc. 1915)
n = 2 4 6 12 24 36 48 60 120 . . .
d(n) = 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 12 16 . . .
log 1729
Example: For t = , we have 2t = 1729 ∈ Z, but
log 2
is not an integer.
Pàl Erdős Carl Ludwig Siegel
√ !
63 17 + 15 5
√ = 3.141592653 80568820189839000630 . . .
25 7 + 15 5
π = 3.141592653 58979323846264338328 . . .
Another formula due to Ramanujan for π
∞
!−1
9 801 X (4n)!(1 103 + 26 390n)
π= √
8 n=0
(n!)4 3964n
n → n + 1: 8 more digits
https://sas.sastra.edu/ramanujan/Ramanujan-Awards.php
SASTRA Ramanujan Prize
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SASTRA_Ramanujan_Prize
ICTP Ramanujan Prize
https://www.ictp.it/about-ictp/prizes-awards/the-ramanujan-prize/the-ramanujan-prize-winners.aspx
ICTP Ramanujan Prize
References (continued)
Don Zagier (March 16, 2005, BNF/SMF) :
Landau–Ramanujan constant
Mock theta functions
Ramanujan prime
Ramanujan–Soldner constant
Ramanujan theta function
Ramanujan’s sum
Rogers–Ramanujan identities
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srinivasa_Ramanujan
Landau–Ramanujan constant
In mathematics, the Landau–Ramanujan constant occurs in a
number theory result stating that the number of positive
integers less than x which are the sum of two square numbers,
for large x, varies as p
x/ ln(x).
The constant of proportionality is the Landau–Ramanujan
constant, which was discovered independently by Edmund
Landau and Srinivasa Ramanujan.
More formally, if N (x) is the number of positive integers less
than x which are the sum of two squares, then
p
N (x) ln(x)
lim ≈ 0.76422365358922066299069873125.
x→∞ x
Landau–Ramanujan constant
M.W. Representation of integers by cyclotomic binary forms.
Number Theory Web Seminar, Tuesday, May 12, 2020.
Link to recording and slides
https://sites.google.com/view/ntwebseminar/previous-talks
2, 11, 17, 29, 41, 47, 59, 67, 71, 97, 101, 107, 127, 149,
151, 167, 179, 181, 227, 229, 233, 239, 241, 263, 269, . . .
1.451369234883381050283968485892027449493 . . .
Ramanujan’s sum (1918)
In mathematics, the
Ramanujan theta function
generalizes the form of the
Jacobi theta functions, while
capturing their general
properties. In particular, the
Jacobi triple product takes on
a particularly elegant form
when written in terms of the
Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi
Ramanujan theta.
(1804–1851)
Rogers–Ramanujan identities
In mathematics, the
Rogers–Ramanujan identities
are a set of identities related
to basic hypergeometric
series. They were discovered
by Leonard James Rogers
(1894) and subsequently
rediscovered by Srinivasa
Ramanujan (1913) as well as
Leonard James Rogers
by Issai Schur (1917).
1862 - 1933
G.H. Hardy: Divergent Series
In
1
= 1 + z + z2 + z3 + · · ·
1−z
set z = −1, as Euler does:
1
1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ··· = ·
2
deduce
1
1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + ··· = ·
4
s = 1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + ···
(1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + · · · )2 = (1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + · · · )(1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + · · · )
yields to 2
1 1
1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + ··· = = ·
2 4
Cesaro convergence
For a series
a0 + a1 + · · · + an + · · · = s
converging (in the sense of Cauchy), the partial sums
s n = a0 + a1 + · · · + an
1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ···
s0 + · · · + sn
lim
n→∞ n+1
a0 + a1 + a2 + · · · = s and b0 + b1 + b2 + · · · = t implies
a0 + b0 + a1 + b1 + a2 + b2 + · · · = s + t.
a0 + a1 + a2 + · · · = s if and only if a1 + a2 + · · · = s − a0 .
12 − 2 2 + 3 2 − 42 + · · ·
Recall
1
= 1 + 2z + 3z 2 + 4z 3 + · · ·
(1 − z)2
Take one more derivative, you find also
1
1 · 2 − 2 · 3 + 3 · 4 − 4 · 5 + ··· =
4
from which you deduce
12 − 22 + 32 − 42 + · · · = 0.
Further examples of divergent Series
1 + 1 + 1 + ··· = 0
1
1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + ··· =
3
1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + · · · = −1
Euler:
1 1
1 − 1! + 2! − 3! + 4! + · · · = −e(γ − 1 + − + ···)
2 · 2! 3 · 3!
gives the value 0.5963 . . . also found by Ramanujan.
Ramanujan’s method (following Joseph Oesterlé)
Here is Ramanujan’s method
for computing the value of
divergent series and for
accelerating the convergence
of series.
The series
a0 − a1 + a2 − a3 + · · ·
can be written
1
(a0 + (b0 − b1 + b3 − b4 + · · · ))
2
where bn = an − an+1 .
Acceleration of convergence
For instance in the case an = 1/ns we have bn ∼ s/ns+1 .
Repeating the process yields the analytic continuation of the
Riemann zeta function.
Srinivasa Ramanujan
His life and his work
Michel Waldschmidt
Sorbonne University
Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu
http://www.imj-prg.fr/~michel.waldschmidt/