Poster Presentation On Heterotic Grouping

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Test cross breeding potential of segregating

populations derived from two-, three- and


four- parents crosses in maize (Zea mays L.)
D MONIKA, PAMB 2226
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CoA, GKVK.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ▪ Estimates of TC hybrid variances derived from


INTRODUCTION
the two-, three- and four-parents’ crosses were
▪ The estimates of mean grain yield of the TC
▪ Breeders normally use bi-parental crosses to comparable (Fig 2)
hybrids of partial inbred lines derived from two-,
generate variability
three- and four- parents’ crosses were comparable
▪ Of late, several breeders advocating the use of
(Fig 1)
multi-parent (MP) crosses to generate variability
▪ The use of MP crosses is justified if their testcross
breeding potential in terms of mean and variance ‘F’ Statistic: 0.55
is more than compensates the longer time and ‘F’ Probability: 0.69
other resources required for their development(
Bernardo , 2021)
Fig 3: Agarose gel image showing SSR marker –
OBJECTIVE based genetic diversity among parents
▪ To assess test cross hybrid means and variance of
▪ However, the estimates of the standardized
random partial inbred lines derived from two-,
range (Fig 4) which quantifies extreme
three- and four-parents’ crosses
performance of TC hybrids derived from two-
MATERIALAND METHODS parent crosses were greater than those derived
from three- and four- parents’ crosses
▪ The experimental material consisted of partial Fig 1: Box plot depicting test cross hybrid means of
inbred lines derived from the following two-, two-, three- and four- parents’ crosses- derived 0.8
three- and four – parents’ crosses partial inbred lines 0.7
Two parent crosses

Standardized Range
SCH : Two-parents’ cross-derived partial inbred lines 0.6
1. MAI 105 × MAI 194 (SCH 1)
population, TCH : Three-parents’ cross-derived 0.5
2. SKV 50 × MAI 194 (SCH 2)
partial inbred lines, DCH : Four-parents’ cross-
Three parent crosses 0.4
derived partial inbred lines
1. ( MAI 105 × MAI 194) × 40061 (TCH 1)
0.3
2. ( SKV 50 × MAI 194) × 40061 (TCH 2) 450
Four parent crosses 0.2
400 Levene’s test statistic : 0.56
1. ( SKV 50 × MAI 349) × ( MAI 105 × MAI Probability : 0.68 0.1
350
194) (DCH 1)
Genotypic variance

300 0
SCH1 SCH2 TCH1 TCH2 DCH1
Lines Tester 250
× Fig 4: Bar diagram indicating standardized range
20 each of the randomly LM 13 200
segregating partial inbred of TC hybrids of two-, three-and four- parents’
150
lines from five populations crosses- derived partial inbred lines
100
50
100 Test cross (TC) hybrids were derived CONCLUSION
during 2023 post rainy season 0
SCH1 SCH2 TCH1 TCH2 DCH1 ➢ Mean grain yield and variance of TC
Fig 2: Bar graph indicating the test cross hybrid hybrids derived from two-, three- and four-
Field evaluation genotypic variance of two-, three- and four- parents’ parents’ crosses were comparable
crosses - derived partial inbred lines ➢ Bi-parental crosses are likely to uncover
Season Design greater frequency of more extreme
α- lattice with Table 1: Estimates of SSR marker- based parental phenotypes as evident from SR
2023 Rainy season
2 replications genetic distance and mean and variance of different ➢ It is not worthwhile to affect either three-
▪ Data was recorded on grain yield per plant types of crosses parents’ or four-parents’ crosses to generate
➢ Statistical analysis variability considering the time resources
SSR marker-based Mean
▪ ANOVA performed to detect genetic differences Crosses Variance
genetic distance grain yield
among TC hybrids
SCH1 0.58 109.28 171.71 REFERENCE
▪ TC hybrid mean and variance were estimated SCH2 0.60 107.59 142.01
➢ Inference Criteria BERNARDO, R., 2021, Predictive breeding in
TCH1 0.53 107.57 213.14
Higher the estimates of mean , standardized range maize during the last 90 years. Crop Sci. 61:
TCH2 0.59 112.73 315.27
(SR) and variance, better is the breeding potential DCH1 0.58 114.46 411.94 2872-2881.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy