Project Proposal & Annotated Bibliography
Project Proposal & Annotated Bibliography
Project Proposal & Annotated Bibliography
Prabhpreet singh
Instructor
PHIL 2399 A
2
Abstract
devices available at home including, mobile phones and computers in their school work. In
K-12 learners, the use of technology is usually supervised to prevent distraction and misuse
of devices. Mobile phones are schools remain a debatable issue since learners can easily
access and use the devices by virtue of being exposed. Despite the benefits that accrue to
the use of mobile phones, they pose a risk of increased bullying at school, distractions,
and noise, which lowers the quality of learning. Research included in the discussion concur
on the negative implications of mobile phones in schools on learners' mental and physical
wellbeing. While it appears noble to keep learners updated on technology, schools should be
parents and caregivers might not readily appraise. Children can efficiently share images and
texts about others to enhance bullying, while being oblivious of the resultant emotional
implications. Mobile phones also distract learners due to the consistent urge to check on the
devices, particularly when they are expecting information from their peers. Sustained
distraction can affect learning outcomes. Additionally, teachers may not consistently monitor
all the students without affecting the quality of their lesson delivery and course outcomes.
The multiple disruptions from devices pollute the learning environment and affects the
concentration of other learners who may not have devices. Some educational scholars argue
that students should not be restricted from using devices in the fast-paced technological
environment. However, such use may not be productive when it remains unsupervised in K-
12 schools. The use of other school-owned and controlled technological devices and
applications, therefore, should justify the ban of mobile phones in K-12 schools.
3
Annotated Bibliography
Beneito, P., & Vicente-Chirivella, O. (2020). Banning mobile phones at schools: Effects on
The article investigates the impact of banning mobile phones in schools on bullying.
The authors employ a comparative case study of two regions in Spain where jurisdictional
authorities had banned mobile phones in schools in 2015. Through a diff-in-diff regression
analysis, the research revealed that bullying incidents had reduced among children aged
between 12 and 17 years. The findings are crucial to the topic because it supports its position
on the restriction of mobile phones in schools. Particularly, it affirms that restricted use has
The article refutes that mobile phones have detrimental Implications on instruction
and classroom behavior. Teachers who took part in the Action Research confirmed that
engagement. The article contributes to the topic by providing a counter view of the thesis,
00156-7
The study explored the position of teachers in secondary schools with non-restrictive
policies on the use of mobile phones. In a quantitative review, the teachers observed that
mobile phones in secondary schools increase the prevalence of abusive behavior, distraction,
4
and noise. The article is crucial to the discussion because it supports the thesis. It also helps
to dispel the notion that older learners are more responsible when using mobile devices in the
classroom.
Robertson, L., Muirhead, B., & Corrigan, L. (2020, March). ‘Don’t answer that!’-cell phone
The article explores the validity of the restrictions passed by the Ontario authority to
bar learners from having mobile phones in the classroom. Despite the widespread digital
connectivity and the need to share information, the article considers the possibility of mobile
phones distracting learners. The article uses a policy analysis framework to justify the
position of the Ontario Education Minister, who posits that there is high probability that
learners would be distracted by social media when they should be focusing on classroom
activities. The article is crucial in the discussion because it provides a balanced approach on
when cellphones can be used, which allows a guided approach to the use of digital
technology. This coincides with the papers proposition that mobile phones should only be
Smale, W. T., Hutcheson, R., & Russo, C. J. (2021). Cell phones, student rights, and school
The article explores the negative consequences of allowing learners to bring mobile
phones to school. Using a literature review of multiple sources, the authors conclude that
mobile phones in schools increase the risk of cyberbullying, sexting, and academic
dishonesty. In the longterm, the implications would lead to mental health problems that can
be effectively averted. The article informs the papers thesis that mobile phones distract
References
Beneito, P., & Vicente-Chirivella, O. (2020). Banning mobile phones at schools: Effects on
00156-7
Robertson, L., Muirhead, B., & Corrigan, L. (2020, March). ‘Don’t answer that!’-cell phone
Smale, W. T., Hutcheson, R., & Russo, C. J. (2021). Cell phones, student rights, and school