SAQA - 8420 - Assessment Guide
SAQA - 8420 - Assessment Guide
SAQA - 8420 - Assessment Guide
ASSESSMENT GUIDE
US ID: 12646
Perform quality checks
1|Page
CANDIDATE DETAILS
Candidate
Name:
Identity Number
Tel: Email:
Assessor Name:
Tel: Email:
Moderator
Name:
Tel: Email
Physical Address:
Tel:
Declaration:
Candidate
Date
signature
Assessor
Date
signature
Moderator
Date
signature
2|Page
ASSESSMENT STRATEGY
Qualificatio NATIONAL CERTIFICATE: SAQA QUAL
20288
n Title FARMING ID
Total Credit
Level
NQF Level 2 Value 120
The National Certificate: Wholesale and Retail: Buying Planning, NQF
Level 5 addresses skills and competencies required to effectively
follow a career and make use of opportunities in the buying and
procurement function.
Target
Group After the successful completion of this qualification learners will be
able to:
Understand the nature and importance of the buying and planning
function in the Wholesale and Retail environment.
Plan product procurement within the context of competitor strategies,
merchandising per performance, pricing, organisational target
markets and product range identification.
Calculate costing and pricing.
Apply decision-making and negotiating skills.
Perform buying and associated administrative activities in the area of
specialisation.
Range Addressed
The range covered, refers to all the unit standards, specific
outcomes and assessment criteria as outlined by the
Qualification.
Summative Assessment
This is a summative assessment and assesses candidates for
NATIONAL CERTIFICATE: FARMING
Rating
Learners are rated “Competent" or "Not Yet Competent”.
Assessment Instruments
Types of
Assessment Method
Evidence
Knowledge Questionnaire:
Product Sampling:
Direct
All your documented evidence on completion of
the assessment process will be evaluated.
Assessment Conditions
Review the
Complete the “Assessment Review” documents and submit
Assessment
to the assessment co-ordinator.
Process
Assessor
Date
Signature
ASSESSMENT CONFIRMATION
We will discuss:
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any further queries.
Thank you
DESCRIPTION YE N COMMENTS/
S O CONTINGENCY
This assessment is a formative assessment and
it is based on the outlined unit standard/s for
the Perform quality checks module.
Your assessment evidence for the Perform
quality checks module needs to be submitted
on....... (day) of...............(month)...........(year)
at the following
address/place.....................................................
...........
You will be assessed based on the outlined Unit
Standards. The assessment activities are linked
to specific outcomes/assessment criteria of the
outlined Unit Standards.
To determine your competence level, the
following are the methods to be used for this
assessment:
1. Knowledge questionnaire
2. Product Sampling
To be declared competent on Perform
quality checks module (formative
assessment), you should have obtained at least
80% of the total mark of this assessment.
You will be provided with detailed feedback on
your performance of this assessment as
follows:
1. Written Feedback
2. Verbal Feedback
Should you be declared “not yet competent” on
this assessment, you will be entitled for re-
assessment opportunity/ies.
You will be required to re-submit evidence (only
for areas) you were declared not yet
competent. A date for re-submission will be
Learner’s Declaration
I…………………………………………………………………………………………….herewith
declare that I am ready for the assessment, that we have reviewed the assessment
preparation and plan, I understand the assessment process and I am happy that the
assessment will be conducted in a fair manner.
Learner Signature: Date: Assessor Date:
Signature:
Candidate Assessor
Venue Date
Qualificatio
NATIONAL CERTIFICATE: FARMING
n
EVIDENCE SUMMARY
TYPES OF ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK REQUIREMEN
EVIDENCE METHODS TS MET
YES NO
DIRECT KNOWLEDGE
QUESTIONNAIR
E
The candidate is not yet competent in The following items needed some
the following criteria: corrective action or improvement:
RE-ASSESSMENT DECISION: 1
The candidate has submitted additional evidence that was required. The
evidence is valid, relevant, sufficient and authentic against the listed specific
outcomes and covered all range statements. (Yes/No)
RE-ASSESSMENT DECISION: 2
The candidate has submitted additional evidence that was required. The
evidence is valid, relevant, sufficient and authentic against the listed specific
outcomes and covered all range statements. (Yes/No)
Declaration by candidate
Candidate Application
Date
Assessor Assessment
Date
Assessment
Venue
Different Time
List any special needs you
may have.
The following will apply with reference to the (Insert company name) re-
assessment policy:
1. When a candidate has to undergo re-assessment, he/she will be given
specific feedback and guidance so as to concentrate on areas of weakness.
2. The onus is on the candidate to communicate with the assessor to inform
him/her when he/she is ready for assessment
3. The re-assessment will take place in the same/similar situation or context
and under the same conditions
4. The same assessment methods and/or instruments may be used, but the
task and materials will be different but at the same level and complexity as
the previous task
5. Re-assessment can take place a maximum of 2 times per candidate, per
unit standard. Any further reassessment must be discussed with clients so
as to arrive at the best solution and advice for the learner.
6. A maximum of 3 months will be allowed in between each re-assessment,
unless otherwise discussed between the parties
7. Guidance will be given to those candidates who are unsuccessful after 3
attempts, and possible and more suitable learning avenues will be offered
to learners. Costs will be discussed with the SETA and client and any costs
incurred will be at a learners’ cost.
Candidate Assessor
Venue Review date
Qualification NATIONAL CERTIFICATE: FARMING
ASSESSO CANDIDAT
Review Dimension ACTION
R E
Agree
The principles/criteria for good Agree
Disagre
assessment were achieved. Disagree
e
Agree
The assessment related to the Agree
Disagre
registered unit standard. Disagree
e
Agree
Agree
The assessment was practicable. Disagre
Disagree
e
It was time efficient and cost- Agree
Agree
effective and did not interfere Disagre
Disagree
with my normal responsibilities. e
The assessment instruments Agree
Agree
were fair, clear and Disagre
Disagree
understandable. e
The assessment judgements Agree
Agree
were made against set Disagre
Disagree
requirements. e
Agree
The venue and equipment were Agree
Disagre
functional. Disagree
e
Special needs were identified Agree
Agree
and assessment plan was Disagre
Disagree
adjusted. e
Agree
Feedback was constructive Agree
Disagre
against the evidence required. Disagree
e
Specific Outcome 2 Describe and carry out the roles and responsibilities required to work in a team.
Specific Outcome 3 Identify factors affecting a team within workplace and learning environment and explain affect.
UNIT STANDARD CCFO Working effectively with others Activity 1-12 Task 1-12
WORKING as a member of a team, group,
organisation or community -
relates to the all outcomes.
UNIT STANDARD CCFO Organizing and managing Activity 1-12 Task 1-12
ORGANISING oneself effectively - relates to
the all outcomes.
UNIT STANDARD CCFO Personal Development - relates Activity 1-12 Task 1-12
DEMONSTRATING to the all outcomes.