RESTORATION
RESTORATION
RESTORATION
AND
dtd.9.6.23
jajpur, …….APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
Dist-khurdha
Chandaka, Dist-khurdha
2
…..… RESPONDENTS
1) That, the petitioner filed the above case correction of ROR in the name
of the petitioner.
2) That, after admission direction was issued to the petitioner’s counsel to
file substitution petition for opp-party no-4 and correct address for opp-
party no-
3) That, it is necessary to mention here that the abovementioned case the
previous Counsel have not seen the list and on the date i.e.,
06.05.2022 when the matter was called no one appeared for which the
matter has been dismissed for want of prosecution.
4) That it is submitted that the petitioners/ Appellants due to COVID-19
did not contract the counsel regularly and neither the counsel informed
the petitioner/ Appellant for this. when the petitioners/ Appellants
enquired into the matter personally , as to why the case has not been
listed they came to know that the matter has been dismissed due to
want of prosecution on dated 06.05.2022
3
Date: Advocate
AFFIDAVIT
I, Prasanta Kumar Jena, aged about 54 years, S/O-late Sasadhar Jena,
affidavit
2) That the facts stated above are all true to the best of my
Identified by
ADVOCATE DEPONENT
CERTIFICATE
Certified that due to non availability of cartridge papers this has been
Date: Advocate