Tylor PhilosophyReligionamong 1870
Tylor PhilosophyReligionamong 1870
Tylor PhilosophyReligionamong 1870
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland is collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of the Ethnological Society of London (1869-
1870)
OF THE
and is often so called. But the word has this obvious defect to
us-that it has become the designation of a peculiar modern sect,
who, indeed, hold extreme spiritualistic doctrines, but who cannot
be taken as typical of the theory of spiritualism among mankiind
at large. It may therefore be found convenient to use for the
belief in spiritual beings the not unknown term of Animism.
This animism is, in fact, the groundwork of the philosophy of
religion at large, from the religion of savagery to that of civilized
life. It -may be taken as the minimum definition of religion, in an-
swering the often repeated question, "Have such and such a tribe
a religion ? " If they are animists, we may say "Yes." And
though this definition of minimum religion may seem bare and
meagre, it will be found practically to carry more than at first
appears. For, first, he who believes in spiritual beings will
generally be found to believe them active as to his own life
here and hereafter; and secolndly, he who believes in such active
spirits will generally put himself into intercourse with them,
seeking to propitiate them, and thus will arise some form of
prayer and worship.
Here arises a profoundly interesting question, " Are there, or
have there been human tribes so low in culture as to have no
religious conceptions whatever?" This is an old question, and
has been affirmed and denied for thousands of years with a con-
fidence that may seem surprising to us, who see on what imper-
fect evidence both affirmationi and denial were based.
Ethlnographers, if looking to a theory of development to ex-
plain civilization, regarding its successive stages as rising from
low grades upwards, would receive with great interest accounts
of tribes devoid of all religion. Here, they will naturally say,
are tribes of men who have no religion because their forefathers
never had any. They represent a prereligious stage of the
human race, above which, in the course of ages, religious stages
have risen; but, though in general advocating a development-
theory of culture, I am unable to start a theory of animism
from this prereligious condition. The niche is ready, but there
is a difficulty about the statue to place in it. I fail to find the
existence of tribes in this state proved by sufficient evidence.
Assertions of tribes said to have no religion, but who prove, on
closer examination, to bave a good deal, and of others whose reli-
gious condition is obscure, may be had in abundance, but will not
serve our purpose. What is wanted is a declaration by observers
intimately acquainted with the language of the tribe, and also
intimate enough to gain confidence on a subject on which savages
are less apt to be confidential than any other. The savage's poor
shy gods hide in holes and corners before the white man's
mightier Deity. Now it is not denied in the abstract that
Thus the Nicaraguans held that when a man dies, there comes
out of his mouth something resembling a person, which is the
life, and which departs to where the man is; but the body re-
mains here. Parallel to this is the African conception of the
man's shadow seized by a monster, whereupon the man after-
wards dies-a story which appears to give the fundamental idea
of the well-known European folk-lore tales of shadowless men.
The soul-ghost appears in dreams and visions. Live men's
souls may do this, as when a Fijian's soul goes out in sleep, and
troubles other people. But especially the souls of the dead are
supposed to do this. Thus Wilson says of the negroes that their
dreams are visits from souls of deceased friends, and that the
habit of talking dreams over makes them dream the more, till
they have almost as much intercourse with the dead in sleep as
with the living in waking, and can hardly distinguish dream
from fact. A familiar classic instance is when the soul of Pa-
troklos stands by Achilles, like in stature and the beauteous eyes,
and the voice and garments; Achilles tries to grasp it with
loving hands, but cannot catch it, and like a smoke the soul is
borne away. The shade-soul appears as a ghost in the philoso-
phy alike of the North-American Indian, the African negro,
and the European peasant.
For obvious reasons, the idea appears in savage psychology
that the soul is sometimes visible and sometimes invisible. This
explains the fact of only one seeing it at once, though we
account for this in a different way by the theory of the subjec-
tivity of visions. This is unknown to the savage, who (these
Africans may serve as a type) is a man who scarcely distin-
guishes his subjectivity from objectivity, hardly knows his inside
from his outside.
The animistic theory, as it explains death, so among many
races explains sleep, and with this dreaming works in, as when
the Greenlander lies insensible while his soul goes out hunting
and visiting. The Karens cleverly account for the fact of our
seeing known places in dreams, by saying that the leip-pya can
only find the way where it has been before in life. It explainis
coma, where the body lies senseless while the mind wakes with
new experiences, as when Australian or Khond sorcerers go out
of their bodies for spirit-knowledge, or where in the Vatns-doela
Saga, the Finns sent to visit Iceland lie rigid while their souls
go out on the errand and return with information. Of classic
tales appropriate to these things, is the story of Hermotimos,
whose body his wife burnt while his soul was gone out in search
of spiritual knowledge. It explains sick-ness, as when the
Karens call back the kelah of a sick man, and the sick Fijian
may be heard bawling for his own soul to come back.
It has been well said of the Polynesians by Ellis, that they hold
the doctrine expressed in Milton's lines-
"Millions of spiritual creatures walk the earth,
Unseen, both when we wake and when we sleep."
And from this level the doctrine of nature-pervading spirits
extends fully into mediaeval European culture, and thence holds
on to no small extent in survival.
What are these spirits for? If it be true, as the poet sings,
"Felix qui potuit rerutn cognoscere causas,"
then the savage should be happy, for here he at least thinks he
has grasped the causes of things. To hiim all is the immediate
work of personal spirits. We have seen that life and death and
dreams and disease have spirits for causes, and so, to the savage
mind, nature throughout is animated nature. As theAbbe Raynal
says, where there is motion, there the savage supposes a soul.
What gives some men knowledge and power sometimes, or takes
it away? What makes strange noises in the hut? What pushes
the North-American Indian into the fire? What pulls him
under water? What drives the fat deer some days into his
path, and some days gives none? Do not go under that tree,
the fever demon is sitting upon the branches ready to pounce
upon you. Will you cross the lake? Pray, and offer to its
Manitu.
From the tiniest elf in the long grass to the Gitchi Manitu, all
spirits are causes. The hamadryad of the tree grows with it, and
dies when it falls, " Non sine hamadryadis fato." Every group
of trees, every grove has its presidi-ng genius. Wells, waterfalls,
rocks have their superintending spirits; and over these reigns
the higher Spirit of the Forest, the Water, &c. Species and tribes,
animal and human, have presiding genii. Whatever we may
judge of the savage belief in spirits, we are not to call it a pur-
poseless fancy; for these beings have full office to perform in
being, as it were, the souls of natural objects in carrying on
their operations. Phenomena which the savage referred to the
action of personal spirits, civilized peoples explain by theories of
another sort; but we are not to misunderstand the reasonable,
purposeful inference by which men in the lower culture used the
theory of animism to serve them as a philosophy of nature.
In conclusion, as to the higher deities of Polytheism. Above
the inferior divinities of nature there reign the great nature-
gods, whose sway extends not over this or that district, but over
the world at large-Sun and Moon, Heaven and Earth and Sea,
the Thunder-god, the Storm-god. Evil deities are often more
propitiated than good, as the savage seeks rather to appease his
enemy than please his friend; and early in savage culture ap-
pears that Dualism which divides spiritual beings into good and
evil, i. e. friendly and hostile, each company led by a great deity.
And sometimes a deity is erected into supremacy. Thus over
the polytheistic system of nature-gods reigns the Peruvian Sun-
god; the Heaven-god is the Chinese Tien or the Greek Zeus.
Even the system of the manes-worshippers admits of a primeval
ancestor obtaining the divine supremacy, like the Unkulunkulu,
the Old-old-one of the Zulus.
It has thus been attempted to set forth very briefly the out-
lines of the lower animism. The theory of its development may
be thus recapitulated: Man's earliest and primitive conception
of a spiritual being may well have been that of his own human
soul, the idea of which served to explain many of the great phe-
nomena of his own existence-life, death, sleep, dreams, visions,
ecstasy, disease. Then he may have extended this conception
to souls of animals, trees, even lifeless objects. Then looking
to the analogy of his own human life to explain the action of
Nature at large, he attributed to other spiritual beings, bearing
strong likeness in form and character to the souls, the existence
and growth of a nature which to him was indeed " animated
nature" in a sense far beyond ours. These spiritual beings are
of many orders, from low elves up to great fetish deities like
Heaven or Sun; and the Polytheism of low races even shows traces
of approach to the supremacy of one great deity, and thus
faintly foreshadows the coming Monotheism. But throughout
his hierarchy the human conception served as his model of the
divine.
This may be called the natural theology of the lower races.
It is true that it differs a good deal from the natural theology
of which we read in books. But then we must remember that
men like Paley and Butler drew their main ideas from races at
a condition as high at least as the ancient Greeks. Ethnology
was scarcely known to them, or appreciated by them.
The great question for ethnographers is, Do these savage
views represent remnant or rudiment? If they represent a rem-
nant of broken down high culture, they are of comparatively
little consequence. But if-and, it seems to me, the more we
work at ethnography the more we shall admit this-if they
represent human thought at a comparatively rudimentary stage,
they become of immense practical interest. To understand the
rude animism of the lower races, and to trace it onward as modi-
fied from century to century to fit with more advanced intelli-
gence, is indispensable to the full comprehension of not only the
historical but the actual position of philosophy and theology.
DISCTSsION.
Mr. IJoWORTH thanked the author for the new and suggestive
manner in which he had treated a much-written about and apparently
trite subject. In illustration of his remark, that the immolation of
the widow on the pyre of her deceased husband is a very widespread
custom, the speaker observed that he had met with a curious illustra-
tion a short time ago in an essay by D'Ohsson, giving, from an
Arabic traveller, an account of the funeral of a Nbrse chief, which he
witnessed at Bolghara. The body was laid out in a ditch for ten
days. Meanwhile the bark of the deceased was dragged ashore, a
splendid tent of Roman cloth of gold erected on it, in which was put
a couch, and on the couch the dead warrior in most sumptuous dress.
His wives and slaves were now asked which of them would volunteer
to die on the pyre. An old hag, called the Angel of Death, was
mistress of the ceremonies. The volunteer, after drinking plenty of
spirits and wailing a weird good-bye to her friends, was then
strangled and placed alongside her dead husband. Two horses were
then chased round till they were fagged and covered with sweat
(apparently to make them easier to catch in the Happy Land); they
were then killed, as were also two hounds and a cock and hen. The
whole having been thrown on the pyre, fire was applied, and in the
quaint language of the Arab, the deceased went straight to Heaven
instead of passing through ignoble worms. This account has been
confirmed to the letter by the Cossack explorations of graves at
Novgorod.
With Mr. Tylor's conclusions the speaker could not possibly
agree. Comparative mythology, like comparative philology and
even anatomy, cannot be safely treated empirically. The only scien-
tific-method is the historic. We must trace up the history of known
religions to their sources if we are to generalize on the source of
all religions. If we approach our subject from this point, we shall
find that MIr. Tylor's theory is untenable. He argues that polytheism
is the earliest type of religion, and that polytheism is only a deve-
lopment of manes or ancestral worship, and was in its origin invari-
ably anthropomorphic. Now among the Norsemen and the Greeks
we can actually trace the first introduction of manes-worship at a
very secondary state of religious development. The demigods of the
Greeks, like Odin and his Asirs among the Norsemen, formed no
part of their original mythology, which was in both cases that of
superhuman deities. If we examine religions nearer home, in Italy
and Portugal for instance, we shall find that an immature form of
polytheism has developed itself from a monotheistic religion, The
army of saints, whose cultus is more popular than and even hides
that of the Deity himself, is but an everyday type of the growth of
polytheism. If we examine the earliest records we possess, the in-
scriptions of Mesopotamia, we shall find a more reasonable theory
for the growth of polytheism. Each town and little community has
its separate god, and only one god, the God of the Hebrews, of the
Hittites, &c. When several of these communities were joined into
one state, the latter adopted these national gods (originally the
same god), and thus formed a Pantheon.
Fetishism is the natural growth of pantheism. The universally
present god is easily translated by the savage mind into a substan-
tive god in each material object. This growth we may also trace in
better known mythologies; spirits of woods and brooks and hills are
only disintegrated portions of the one underlying spirit.
Mr. Howorth held that the historic testimony proved that the
simplest and earliest form of religion is monotheism, from which
the various faiths of savages have grown-luxuriantly grown very
often; and where we see the introduction of a monotheistic creed
among a polytheistic race, it is only another instance of the philo-
sophy of the more cultured human mind reverting to its original and
most ancient creed.
Mr. HYDE CLARKE called attention to the phenomena connected
with the comparative psychology of the subject-the animistic ten-
dencies of animals. Those who have experience of the domestic
animals know that they have superstitions like ourselves. The dog
or the horse is affected by the same strange appearances as is the
man, and has the like dread of ghosts arnd spirits. It might be asked
how a,nimals obtained these ideas; but Mr. Tylor had afforded a clue
by his reference to the experience of man in dreams as to phantoms
and creatures of a disturbed imagination. The mind of a dog being
constituted like that of a man, he has, there can be no reasonable
doubt, the same p?henomena of dreaming, and in the disordered
condition of the senses at the moment of waking would see distorted
images, which are treated as actual experiences. In this way he
accounted for the growth of superstition in animals, although they
have no means of intercommunication, except by the propagation of
fear at the sight of some object of alarm.
With regard to the doctrine of the transmigration of the souls of
ancestors to children, he would suggest that it may be partly due to
the natural phenomena of atavism. Where it has been observed
that a child inherits the likeness or qualities of a grandparent
(those of the grandsire), it was easy to suppose that he has inherited
the soul. Mr. Tylor's doctrine of the influence of the dual idea of
good and evil in animistic developments should be extended to the
influence of the dual sexual idea, as more notably in its application
to the sun and moon and the nature-gods.
Mr. TYLOR, in a brief reply, called attention to the citation by
Jacob Grimm (in his ' Verbrennen der Leichen ') of the remarkable
Slavonic wife-sacrifice noticed by Mr. Howorth. With regard to
the argument for monotheism as the original doctrine of mankind,
Mr. Tylor pointed out that the course theology has taken in the
world is indicated by the fact that the religions of savage races afford
explanations of otherwise obscure beliefs and rites of the civilized
world, and not vice versd; so that it is rather in the doctrines of low
tribes than among high nations that original theological conditions
are to be sought.