Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Paul Lorence J.
Ocular
CE_3S
Quiz2
1. Critically examine the budget process in the Philippines, detailing the
steps and Procedures from budget preparation to budget accountability. Identify and Analyze the roles of different government agencies involved in each phase, Including the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), the Executive Branch, Congress, the Commission on Audit (COA), and other relevant entities.
The Philippines’ budget process involves multiple government
agencies, including the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), which formulates the National Expenditure Program (NEP), oversees the release of funds, and the Executive Branch, which submits the proposed budget to Congress. The House of Representatives initiates the budget deliberation process, which is scrutinized by various committees, leading to the creation of the General Appropriations Bill (GAB). The Senate reviews and deliberates on the GAB, and the Bicameral Conference Committee resolves any differences. The Commission on Audit (COA) audits government expenditures to ensure transparency, accountability, and alignment with development goals.
2. Differentiate between the procurement processes for government and
private Civil engineering projects in the Philippines. Discuss the regulatory framework, Particularly focusing on Republic Act No. 9184 (RA 9184) for government Projects, and compare it with the procurement practices typically followed in the Private sector. Highlight the key differences in terms of pre-bidding procedures, Bidding processes, evaluation criteria, and awarding of contracts. Additionally, Analyze the impact of these differences on project transparency, efficiency, and Overall quality.
The article compares the procurement processes for civil
engineering projects in the Philippines, focusing on the government and private sector approaches. It discusses the regulatory framework provided by Republic Act No. 9184, also known as the Government Procurement Reform Act, and its impact on transparency, efficiency, and quality of projects. The Act mandates open and competitive bidding processes, reducing corruption and ensuring public access to information. However, it can lead to delays and potential quality risks. On the other hand, private sector procurement is less regulated, with companies having the flexibility to establish their procurement policies based on best practices and internal guidelines. This results in more efficient and transparent procurement processes, but may also lead to delays.