DRAFTUNSIGNEDNSTFHANDBOOK2023

SCHOOL, DIVISION,
REGIONAL, AND
NATIONAL SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY FAIR
GUIDEBOOK
FIRST EDITION | AUGUST 2023
School, Division, Region, and National Science and Technology Fair Handbook
First Edition May 2023
Copyright © 2023 Department of Education
All rights reserved. This document or any portion thereof may not be reproduced
or used in any manner without the expressed written permission of the publisher
except for the use of quotations with proper referencing and acknowledgment.
For permission requests, please contact the Department of Education

– Bureau of Curriculum Development at bcd.od@deped.gov.ph
SCHOOL, DIVISION,
REGIONAL, AND
NATIONAL SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY FAIR
GUIDEBOOK
FIRST EDITION | MAY 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW 6
II. OBJECTIVES 6
III. FAIR FEATURES 7
TUKLAS: A Research Project Fair

INNOVATION EXPO
STEM ACADEMY
AGHAMBAYANIJUAN
IV. A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE TO STEM RESEARCH INVESTIGATION 7
V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 8

OF LEARNERS AND ADULTS
VI. CONTEST MECHANICS 11
VII. GENERAL PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 12

1. School Science & Technology Fair (SSTF) 12
2. Division Science & Technology Fair (DSTF) 14
3. Regional Level Science & Technology Fair 15
4. National Level Science & Technology Fair 16
VIII. REFERENCES 19
IX. APPENDICES 21
Appendix 1: Schematic Diagram of the Flow of STF Activities 22
Appendix 2: TUKLAS Research Paper Format 23
Appendix 3: TUKLAS Display Board Format and Safety Guidelines 26
Appendix 4: Sample Abstracts 29
Appendix 5: Innovation Expo Paper Format 30
Appendix 6: Innovation Expo Display Board Format 30
Appendix 7: Checkpoints for SRC Review 31
Appendix 8: Learner Media Release Consent Form 33
Appendix 9: Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) Form 34
Appendix 10: Report of the Conduct of the STF Format 35
Appendix 11: List of Forms and Documents Required 35
for Submission in All Levels of Competition
Appendix 12: Innovation Expo Screening Form 36
Appendix 13: Innovation Expo Judges Form 37
Appendix 14: Official List of Participants Template 38
Appendix 15: Suggested Timeline of Activities 39
for the Conduct of Research Projects
Appendix 16: Project Labeling and Coding 41
Appendix 17: End of Activity Report Format for the Regional/ 42
Division/School Science and Technology Fair
Appendix 18: SRC Review and Recommendation 43
Report Form
Appendix 19: BOJ Project Evaluation Form 50
Appendix 20: Sample Board of Judges Summary Score Sheet 52
Appendix 21: Sample Consolidated Board of Judges Score Sheet 53
LIST OF ACRONYMS
AND
ABBREVIATIONS
BOJ Board of Judges
DSTF Division Science and Technology Fair
IACUC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
IRB Institutional Review Board
ISEF International Science and Engineering Fair
LS-I Life Science Individual Category
LS-T Life Science Team Category
MCS-I Mathematics and Computational Science Individual Category
MCS-T Mathematics and Computational Science Team Category
MIM Mathematics Investigation and Modeling
NDA Non-Disclosure Agreement
NSTF National Science and Technology Fair
PHBAs Potentially Hazardous Biological Agents
PS-I Physical Science Individual Category
PS-T Physical Science Team Category
RIM-I Robotics and Intelligent Machines Individual Category
RIM-T Robotics and Intelligent Machines Team Category
RRI Regulated Research Institutions
RSTF Regional Science and Technology Fair
SRC Scientific Review Committee
STEM Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics
TWG Technical Working Group
SCHOOL, DIVISION, REGIONAL, AND NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FAIR GUIDEBOOK
6
OVERVIEW
OVERVIE
he National Science and Technology Fair (NSTF) is an project-based research, which highlights their competence
T
W
annual Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in the application of STEM process skills, design thinking
(STEM) research and innovation competition organized by the skills, and 21st-century skills in real-life setting. They work
Department of Education through the Bureau of Curriculum independently or in teams to address community problems
Development. Conducted among junior and senior high and research gaps in fields such as Life Sciences, Physical
school learners, the competition starts from the school level Sciences, Robotics and Intelligent Machines, Engineering,
which progresses through the division, regional, and national and Mathematics that interest them. NSTF also provides an
levels. Around 3,000 research projects from public and avenue to encourage and inspire Filipino learners from the
private high schools are evaluated by the Scientific Review different regions of the country to pursue STEM careers as
Committees (SRC), and are pared down to an average of 80 researchers, scientists, technology experts, engineers, and
STEM projects competing in the national level every year. mathematicians who will provide positive and significant
contributions in the country.
NSTF showcases the top young STEM-oriented high
school learners and the culmination of their acquired and NSTF serves as a STEM talent pipeline, selecting young
applied scientific and mathematical knowledge, skills, and STEM enthusiasts to compete in international research and
attitudes manifested through STEM investigations with the innovation competitions, primarily the annual International
development of effective and efficient solutions to address Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF). ISEF is the world’s
local and global issues and challenges. The competition largest and premier pre-college STEM competition involving
also celebrates the achievements and collaboration of local thousands of student researchers. Every ISEF finalist is
research communities. These communities are established celebrated by fellow attending learners, parents, teachers,
through the initiatives of junior and senior high school mentors, sponsors, organizers, experts/judges, government
learners, with the extended efforts and support of parents, units, and the public from various countries, regions, and
teachers, school administrators, staff, a pool of experts territories. They come together in a global research endeavor
from research institutions, government agencies and units, to design and develop STEM advancements for sustainable
organizations, industries, and other stakeholders. development.
Through NSTF, thousands of learners are challenged to

go beyond their classroom studies to do independent
OBJECTIVES
The National Science and Technology Fair (NSTF) aims to:
Develop and strengthen the Science, Technology, Provide an avenue for high school learners to communicate
Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) skills of learners research findings and showcase their investigations and
through the conduct of research projects that address innovations to both the STEM community and the public.
local, national and/or global issues, concerns, and
problems;
Provide an avenue for high school learners to

communicate research findings and showcase their
investigations and innovations to the STEM community
and the public;
Foster a culture of creativity and innovation among the

youth;
Promote STEM awareness and interest among learners,

teachers, and the public;
Provide an opportunity for collaboration and establish

research networks between and among the learners,
stakeholders, and the community.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
7
FAIR FEATURES
TUKLAS INNOVATION EXPO
A Research Project Fair GAWAD AgLiTekno
A STEM research competition that provides opportunities A Technology Innovation competition which aims to recognize
for Junior and Senior High School learners to showcase their the most creative and market viable project addressing
research projects based on their field of interest and/or real- major issues in food safety, water conservation, renewable
world problems, issues, and concerns. energy, cyber security, road safety, health, disaster mitigation,
agriculture, and environment.
STEM ACADEMY AGHAMBAYANIJUAN

A conference designed to provide the participants with learning A public community exhibition showcasing the partners in STEM
opportunities and experiences through various talks promoting Research and Innovation and their latest innovative products,
innovation, creativity, and excellence in the fields of STEM. technologies, and services offered to different sectors of the
community.
A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE TO
STEM RESEARCH
INVESTIGATION
1 Choose an area of interest or problem to solve
through STEM research. 9 Check the availability of resources, facilities,
equipment, and experts.
2 Gather relevant information to better understand

the topic’s impact. 10 Communicate with regulated research institutions
and qualified scientists for technical assistance.
3 Identify research gaps and ways to address

limitations of previous solutions. 11 Obtain necessary permits for research involving humans,
animals, chemicals, and other biological agents.
4 Develop specific research questions and variables.

12 Conduct experiments, observe, measure, and
record data.
5 Formulate hypotheses and predict expected

outcomes. 13 Organize and present data in tables and/or graphs.
6 Choose appropriate and ethical research

methodologies. 14 Analyze data, draw conclusions, and align with
research questions and hypotheses.
7 Write a project plan with the help of an adviser or

PROJECT consultant. 15 Explain data trends and compare results with
previous studies.
8 Keep a data logbook to record activities, procedures,
literature, raw data, and correspondence. 16 Discuss implications of results and recommend
future studies to expand investigations.
Note: MIM projects need not follow the suggested steps.
OVERVIE
W
STUDENT RESEARCHER
Understands and abides by the ethical and safety
considerations, national laws, and updated rules and
regulations set by the NSTF and ISEF in planning and
Secures the original copies of signed ISEF forms and
certification from Scientific Review Committee (SRC),
Institutional Review Board (IRB) and/or Institutional Animal
performing STEM research investigations. Care and Use Committee (IACUC) before starting the
research work.
Identifies a research topic/problem and formulates a
plan to address the problem. Records the details of the preliminary research project-related
activities, experimentation proper, raw data, and summary
Conducts a comprehensive review of related literatures of the consultations with the research adviser and qualified
about the topic/problem. scientist/laboratory assistant in a data logbook.
Writes a research plan using the prescribed format. Performs the experimentation with the guidance of the
Prepares other documents to support the project research adviser and qualified scientist/laboratory assistant.
plan such as budget plan, timeline of activities, risk
assessment, and target deliverables. Takes necessary and appropriate photo-documentation.
Communicates with qualified scientists from regulated Conducts data analysis with the guidance of the research
research institutions (RRI) to ask for technical assistance adviser and/or statistician.
to improve the research plan and request for permission
to conduct experimentation in the RRIs laboratory/ Writes the research paper following the APA (American
facility with the supervision of a consultant/laboratory Psychological Association) style formatting and citation.
assistant.
Chooses the appropriate category that most accurately fits
Completes all necessary ISEF forms based on the nature the nature of the study and prepares a brief presentation
of the chosen research study. about the research project.
Presents the project display poster and answers questions

and clarifications from the judges and the general public.
ADULT ADVISOR/SPONSOR
May be a teacher, parent, professor, and/or a qualified qualified scientist and designated supervisor b) adherence to
scientist who will directly oversee student researchers the rules, regulations, and laws.
throughout the course of the STEM research project.
Communicates with the parent/guardian of student
Should have a solid background in the area of student researchers regarding the rationale of conducting STEM
research. If not, carry out a literature review to know researches and the general details on how research activities
more about the pre-requisite information regarding the will be carried out. Secures signed copies of parental/
main topic/problem, entities/test subjects, variables, guardian consent for the participation of learners in the
methodologies, and other relevant related literatures research endeavor.
needed to better understand the rationale and basics of
the research project. Reviews the necessary ISEF forms and research proposal to
ensure that learners are abiding by the rules and regulations.
Must be familiar with the safety and ethical considerations,
national laws and updated rules and regulations set Ensures the health and safety of learners by identifying
by NSTF and ISEF in planning and performing STEM potential hazards and evaluates risks involved in all research-
research. related activities with the researchers. Familiarizes learners
on how to minimize research-related risks and carry out
Orients learners on the following: a) roles and necessary measures during emergencies.
responsibilities of the researcher, advisor (adult sponsor),
9
Collaborates with RRIs to ask for technical assistance
from their pool of experts and permission to use their
laboratory facilities. Prepares communication letters,
memorandum of understanding/agreement, and other
necessary requirements.
Monitors the conduct of research activities within

the projected workplan. Asks relevant questions to
researchers before, during and after experimentation
to evaluate and strengthen their understanding of the
technical know-how of the research process.
Allows student researcher consultation during the most

convenient time for both parties (learner and adviser).
Checks the correct usage, syntax, and grammar of

the research paper, and display poster of the student
researchers.
Guides student researcher in choosing the appropriate

category that most accurately fits the nature of the
study.
Conducts local oral defense presentations and provides

comments and suggestions to further improve the
content and delivery of the presentation.
Ensures that the learner is physically, emotionally, and

mentally ready for the oral defense presentation.
QUALIFIED SCIENTIST
A qualified scientist should have earned a doctorate
degree and/or at least 3 years of extensive experience
and expertise in a STEM discipline related to the learner’s
research investigation.
Can also serve as the adult sponsor if the abovementioned

qualifications are met.
Needed for research involving human participants,

animals, hazardous chemicals, and/or other PHBAs.
Must be thoroughly familiar with ethical and safety

considerations, national laws, and updated rules set by
NSTF and ISEF that relate to the nature of the research
project.
Reviews and provides comments and suggestions to

further refine the STEM project proposal. Approves the
learner’s project plan.
Reviews and completes the required documentation in

the ISEF forms and data logbook.
May or may not come from the RRI where experimentation

is to be conducted; if not from RRI, a separate designated
supervisor from the RRI must be present to supervise
the experimentation conducted at the RRI.
Ensures the proper training of student researchers and/

or designated supervisors in carrying out the necessary
procedures.
10
DESIGNATED SUPERVISOR INSTITUTIONAL
Must be familiar with the learner’s project and
REVIEW BOARD
underwent/undergoes relevant trainings related to the
area of study of the researcher. An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a committee
May also serve as the adult sponsor for the project.
If the project involves the use of vertebrate animals, the

designated supervisor must be well-equipped with the
relevant knowledge and skills on proper handling and
ethical concerns with the use of the test animals. least three members: a science teacher, a school
Provides direct supervision during conduct of the

experimentation.
Reviews and completes the required documentation in

the ISEF forms and data logbook.
SCIENTIFIC REVIEW COMMITTEE (SRC)

An SRC must consist of a minimum of three individuals
with at least 3 years of extensive experience and expertise
in STEM research project and/or graduate degrees in
STEM related disciplines, whereas it is recommended
to diversify the expertise of the committee (e.g., Life
Science research SRC: agronomist, STEM professor/
educator, biomedical scientist).
Orientation of SRC members regarding the national

laws, safety and ethical considerations, and the rules and
regulations set by NSTF and ISEF needed to be adhered
in conducting STEM Research Project.
Must be thoroughly familiar with ethical and safety

considerations, national laws, and updated rules and
regulations set by NSTF and ISEF.
Checks and evaluates student research project,

certifications, research plan, documentation, evidence
of proper supervision, and project display in compliance
with NSTF and ISEF rules, applicable laws and regulations
at each level of the STEM fair competitions. Examines
research projects for the following:
a. Evidence of literary research

b. Evidence of proper supervision
c. Consistency of completion of the required
information, signatures and dates in the
ISEF forms and data logbook
d. Use of accepted and appropriate research
methodologies
e. Evidence of risk assessment and appropriate
literatures search and attribution
f. Search for alternatives to animal use
g. Humane treatment of animals
h. Documentation of substantial expansion for
continuation projects
i. Compliance with ISEF ethics statement
NOTE: To avoid conflict of interest, no adult sponsor, parent or

other relative of the student, qualified scientist, or designated
supervisor who oversees the project, may serve on the SRC or
IRB reviewing the STEM research projects.
11
CONTEST MECHANICS
OVERVIE
W
TUKLAS
A Research Project Fair
ELIGIBILITY
The competition is open to Grades 9-12 learners of both
public and private high schools in the Philippines who have
not reached the age of 20 on or before May 1 of the current
school year.
Learners may work individually or in teams with 2-3 members

from the same school. Each learner is only allowed to submit
one (1) research project in one (1) of the four (4) research
categories: Life Science, Physical Science, Robotics and
Intelligent Machines, and Mathematics and Computational
Sciences. The project should include no more than 12 months
of continuous research and should not include research
activities performed before January of the previous school
year. (e.g., For school year 2023-2024 with the target opening
of classes on August 2023 and ISEF on May 2024, research
projects may be accomplished within 1-12 month/s starting
from January 2023 to January 2024).
The top three (3) winners in each category of TUKLAS will

be screened by the division Scientific Review Committee
(SRC) and qualifiers will advance to the Division Science and
Technology Fair (DSTF). Life Science
First placers in each category in the Regional Science and This category deals with living organisms such as plants,
Technology Fair (RSTF)will be screened by the national microorganisms, and animals including humans and their
SRC. The qualifiers will advance to the National Science and life processes. Projects that involve systematic observation,
Technology Fair (NSTF). development, experimentation, and understanding of living
things and biological processes belong to this category.
First and second placers in each category in the Regional Subcategories include Animal Sciences, Biomedical
Science and Technology Fair (RSTF)will be screened by the and Health Sciences, Cellular and Molecular Biology,
national SRC. The qualifiers will advance to the National Microbiology, Plant Sciences, and Translational Medical
Science and Technology Fair (NSTF). Science.
Physical Science
RESEARCH CATEGORIES
This category deals with the nature and properties of non-
living matter, energy and systems. Projects that involve
The STEM research competition is divided into four (4) systematic observation, development, experimentation,
categories. The student researchers and advisor should and understanding of materials and phenomena belong to
carefully consider which category best describes the research this category. Subcategories include Astronomy, Chemistry,
project. They may enter the competition as an individual or Earth and Environmental Sciences, Energy, Engineering
as a team. Technology, Statics and Dynamics, Sustainable Materials
and Design, Environmental Engineering, Materials Science,
and Physics.
Robotics and Intelligent Machines
This category deals with the design, implementation,

and use of prime technologies and machine intelligence
in providing a wide range of innovative solutions and
12
advancements across multiple disciplines to reduce Communication with the preselected qualified
reliance on human intervention. Subcategories include scientist/designated supervisor and Regulated
Biomechanics, Cognitive Systems, Control Theory, Machine Research Institution (RRI).
Learning, and Robot Kinematics.
Submission of Memorandum of Agreement/
Mathematics and Computational Science Understanding and other documentary
requirements (if applicable) to the research
Mathematics deals with the measurement, properties, institution prior to experimentation.
and relationships of quantities and sets using numbers
and symbols. Subcategories include Algebra, Analysis, Completion of the required ISEF forms and
Combinatorics, Graph Theory, Game Theory, Geometry and certifications/pre-approvals before
Topology, Number Theory, and Probability and Statistics. experimentation.
Computational Science deals with the development and Conduct of the research and completion of
implementation of mathematical models and simulations required ISEF forms and data logbook entries for
to understand natural systems and processes, and solve the accomplished research activities.
STEM problems using computers. Subcategories include
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Computational Writing of research manuscript and preparation for
Chemistry, Computational Mechanics, and Theoretical, 10 project display and oral defense.
Computational and Quantum Physics.
Meeting of the department head/chairman and
Technical Working Group (TWG) for the planning of
the conduct of the School Science and Technology
Fair (SSTF).
Issuance of school memorandum regarding the

12 conduct of SSTF which includes the mechanics,
guidelines, criteria, schedule of activities, and TWG
anchored on the Division, Region and National
GENERAL PROCEDURES Science and Technology Fair Memorandum.
AND GUIDELINES
Signing of non-disclosure agreements with the
13 adult sponsor, SRC and TWG members.
A. School Level Science & Technology Fair (SSTF)
Submission of three (3) hard and digital copies of
Before: properly color-coded and sequenced (as indicated
in the memorandum) manuscripts, ISEF forms, data
Orientation of learners regarding the processes logbook, and other entry requirements (student
and guidelines in planning and conducting STEM media release forms, project evaluation forms,
investigations. medical certificate, etc.) to the TWG on or before
the deadline.
Identification of the school level Scientific
Review Committee (SRC) which will evaluate Forwarding of submitted manuscripts to the SRC/
project proposals, required forms, certifications/ 15 Board of Judges (BOJ) for project pre-evaluation
pre-approvals, data logbooks, and research guided by the attached criteria.
manuscripts. Orientation of SRC members
regarding the national laws, safety and ethical Issuance of school memorandum regarding the
considerations, and the rules and regulations 16 results of the SRC review and the list of qualifiers
set by NSTF and ISEF needed to be adhered in for the SSTF and final judging.
conducting STEM research project.
Returning of the qualified SSTF manuscripts and
Writing of the research proposal and completion 17 other entry requirements for further revisions
of the data logbook entries for the planning of the based on the listed comments and suggestions
project. by the SRC in the Review and Recommendation
Report (RRR).
Identification of the research category that best
describes the project and presentation of research Final meeting of the TWG for the preparations
proposals for further revision and approval. 18 needed for the conduct of the SSTF.
Orientation and agreements with parents/ Online resubmission of the digital copies of
guardians on the responsibilities of learners and 19 manuscripts, other entry requirements and
supervisory adults in the specific arrangements PowerPoint presentation for the STEM Congress
during the research activity engagement. to SSTF focal person.
During
13
Registration of participants and submission of the
three (3) softbounded hard copies of color-coded
manuscripts with tags to identify the revisions
done based in the RRR.
It is also suggested for the student researchers to

be in their smart casual during the conduct of SSTF.
Set-up for the project display that conforms with

the display and safety regulations.
Project Display inspection by the assigned TWGs

to ensure adherence to the prescribed project
display rules and guidelines.
Conduct of the SSTF opening program and on-site

judging of the entries.
SRC/BOJ final evaluation of the qualified research

entries through the STEM Congress.
Deliberation of the SRC/BOJ and awarding of the

Top 5 winners for the individual and team projects
in each research category. Other special awards
(e.g., Best Poster, Best Presenter/s, Peers’ Choice
Award, Best Shoutout) and sponsored honorable
awards by institutions/organizations may also be
given to learners and advisors.
Orientation of the student researchers and

advisors of the Top 3 entries for the individual and
team projects in each research category for further
comments, suggestions and other preparations
needed as school representatives to the Division
Science and Technology Fair (DSTF).
After
Issuance of school memorandum regarding the

winners of the SSTF.
Final revision of the manuscripts and other entry

requirements incorporating the recommendations
by the SRC/BOJ.
Re-submission of the revised manuscripts and

other entry requirements to the school SRC for
final quality assurance.
Submission of the Top 3 Entries to the Division

Level Science Fair Technical Working Group
Conduct of STEM cliniquing to improve learners’

presentation skills and preparation of Poster
Displays.
14
B. Division Science & Technology Fair (DSTF) Online resubmission of the digital copies of
13 manuscripts, other entry requirements and
Before: PowerPoint presentation for the STEM congress to
DSTF focal person with official endorsement by the
Planning and consultation meeting spearheaded school head to the division office.
by the Division Education Program Supervisors
in Science and Math with the school heads, and Online pre-registration of participants (optional).
science and mathematics department heads,
coordinators/focal persons, and TWG.
During:
Issuance of the division memorandum on the Registration of participants and submission of the
conduct of the DSTF aligned with the Regional and three (3) softbound hard copies of color-coded
National Memorandum. manuscripts (see Appendix 16) with tags to identify
the revisions done based on the RRR.
Identification of the division level SRC based on
the criteria set by NSTF and ISEF. The division- Submission of the school shoutout and three
level SRC will evaluate the research manuscripts, (3) softbounded hard copies of color-coded
required forms, certifications/pre-approvals, and manuscripts with tags to identify the revisions
data logbooks of the school entries to the DSTF. done based in the RRR. It is also suggested for
the student researchers to be in their formal attire
Orientation of SRC members regarding the during the conduct of DSTF.
national laws, safety, and ethical considerations,
and the rules and regulations set by NSTF and Inspection of the Project display, whereas the
ISEF that needs to be adhered to when conducting TWG may require learners to make revisions in the
STEM investigations. display boards in order to adhere to the prescribed
rules and regulations.
Signing of non-disclosure agreements with the SRC
and TWG members. Conduct of the DSTF opening program and on-site
Submission of the three (3) hard and digital
copies of research manuscripts and other entry SRC/BOJ final evaluation of the qualified research
requirements of the Top 3 entries for the individual entries through the STEM congress.
and team projects in each research category to
the DSTF focal person with attached report of the Deliberation of the SRC/BOJ and awarding of
conduct of SSTF and endorsement by the school the Top 5 winners for the individual and team
head on or before deadline. projects in each research category. Other special
awards (e.g., Best Poster, Best Presenter/s,
Forwarding of submitted manuscripts to the SRC/ People’s Choice Award, Peers’ Choice Award,
BOJ for project pre-evaluation guided with the Best Shoutout) and sponsored honorable awards
attached criteria and RRR. by institutions/organizations may also be given to
learners and advisors.
Issuance of division memorandum regarding the
results of the SRC review and the list of qualifiers Orientation of the student researchers and
for the DSTF and final judging. advisors of the Top 2 entries or the individual and
team projects in each research category for further
Meeting with the learners and advisors of the comments, suggestions and other preparations
unqualified projects for the discussion of the needed as division representatives to the Regional
disapproval/disqualification issues and their rights Science and Technology Fair (RSTF).
for an appeal period of three (3) days. An appeal
can be requested by the student researcher and
advisor through the submission of a letter for
reconsideration addressed to the SRC chairman
explicitly stating the valid explanations to After:
reconsider the disqualification of the entry.
Issuance of division memorandum regarding
Returning of the qualified DSTF manuscripts and the winners of the DSTF and the schedule of
10 other entry requirements for further revisions cliniquing/mentoring/coaching of the regional
based on the listed comments and suggestions by representatives to the RSTF pre-evaluation of
the SRC in the RRR. research projects.
Final meeting of the TWG for the preparations Final revision of the manuscripts and other
needed for the conduct of the DSTF. entry requirements by incorporating the
recommendations of the SRC/BOJ.
Preparation of the 1-minute video presentation for
12 the school shoutout. Improving learners’ presentation skills through the
conduct of mock STEM Congress.
Re-submission of the revised manuscripts and

other entry requirements to the division SRC for
the final quality assurance.
15
C. Regional Level Science & Technology Fair Forwarding of submitted manuscripts to the SRC/
BOJ for project pre-evaluation guided with the
Before: attached criteria and RRR.
Planning and consultation meeting spearheaded Issuance of regional memorandum regarding the
by the Regional Education Program Supervisors results of the SRC review and the list of qualifiers
(REPS) in Science and Math with the division EPSs for the RSTF and final judging.
in science and mathematics, and other members of
the RTWG. Meeting with the learners and advisors of the
unqualified projects for the discussion of the
Identification of the regional level SRC based on disapproval/disqualification issues and their rights
the criteria set by NSTF and ISEF. The regional for an appeal period of three (3) days. An appeal
level SRC will evaluate the research manuscripts, can be requested by the student researcher and
required forms, certifications/pre-approvals, advisor through the submission of a letter for
and data logbooks of the division entries to the reconsideration addressed to the SRC chairman
Regional Science and Technology Fair (RSTF). explicitly stating the valid explanations to
Orientation of SRC members regarding the
national laws, safety and ethical considerations, Returning of the qualified RSTF manuscripts and
10 other entry requirements for further revisions
and the rules and regulations set by NSTF and
ISEF that needs to be adhered to when conducting based on the listed comments and suggestions by
STEM investigations. Signing of non-disclosure the SRC in the RRR.
agreements with the SRC members.
Final meeting of the TWG for the preparations
Signing of non-disclosure agreements with the SRC needed for the conduct of the RSTF.
and TWG members.
Preparation of the 1-minute video presentation for
12 the division shoutout.
Issuance of the regional memorandum regarding
the conduct of RSTF which includes the mechanics,
guidelines, criteria, schedule of activities, and Online resubmission of the digital copies of
13 manuscripts, other entry requirements and
TWG.
PowerPoint presentation for the STEM Congress
Submission of the three (3) hard and digital to RSTF focal person with official endorsement by
copies of research manuscripts and other entry the division office to the regional office.
requirements of the Top 2 entries for the individual
and team projects in each research category to Online pre-registration of participants (optional).
the RSTF focal person with attached report of the
conduct of DSTF and endorsement by the Schools
Division Superintendent on or before deadline.
16
During: After:
Registration of the learner and teacher participants. Issuance of regional memorandum regarding the
winners of the RSTF and the schedule of cliniquing/
Submission of the division shoutout and three mentoring/coaching of the regional representatives
(3) softbounded hard copies of color-coded to the NSTF pre-evaluation of research projects.
manuscripts with tags to identify the revisions
done based in the RRR. It is also suggested for Final revision of the manuscripts and other
the student researchers to be in their smart casual entry requirements by incorporating the
during the conduct of RSTF. recommendations of the SRC/BOJ.
Set-up the project display that conforms with the Improving learners’ presentation skills through the
display and safety regulations. conduct of mock STEM Congress.
Project display inspection whereas the TWG may Re-submission of the revised manuscripts and
require learners to make revisions in the display other entry requirements to the regional SRC for
boards in order to adhere to the prescribed rules the final quality assurance.
and regulations.
D. National Level Science & Technology Fair
Conduct of the RSTF opening program and on-site
judging of the entries. Before:
SRC/BOJ final evaluation of the qualified research Planning and consultation meeting spearheaded
entries through the STEM Congress. by the National Science and Technology Fair Focal
Persons.
Deliberation of the SRC/BOJ and awarding of the
Top 5 Winners for the individual and team projects Identification of the national level SRC based on
in each research category. Other special awards the criteria set by NSTF and ISEF. The national-
(e.g., Best Poster, Best Presenter/s, People’s level SRC will evaluate the research manuscripts,
Choice Award, Peers’ Choice Award, Best Digital required forms, certifications/pre-approvals, and
Shoutout, Most Innovative Award) and sponsored data logbooks of the regional entries to the NSTF.
honorable awards by institutions/organizations
may also be given to learners and advisors. Orientation of SRC members regarding the
national laws, safety and ethical considerations,
Orientation of the student researchers and and the rules and regulations set by NSTF and
advisors of the Top 2 entries for the individual and ISEF that need to be adhered to when conducting
team projects in each research category for further STEM investigations. Signing of non-disclosure
comments, suggestions, and other preparations agreements with the SRC members.
needed as regional representatives to the NSTF.
Signing of non-disclosure agreements with the SRC
and TWG members.
Issuance of the national memorandum regarding

the conduct of NSTF which includes the mechanics,
guidelines, criteria, and schedule of activities.
Submission of the three (3) hard and digital

copies of research manuscripts and other entry
requirements of the Top 2 entries for the individual
and team projects in each research category to
the NSTF focal person with attached report of the
conduct of RSTF and endorsement by the regional
director on or before deadline.
Forwarding of submitted manuscripts to the SRC/

BOJ for project pre-evaluation guided with the
attached criteria and Review and RRR.
Issuance of national memorandum regarding the

results of the SRC review and the list of qualifiers
for the NSTF and final judging.
Meeting with the learners and advisors of the

unqualified projects for the discussion of the
disapproval/disqualification issues and their rights
for an appeal period of three (3) days. An appeal
can be requested by the student researcher and
advisor through the submission of a letter for
17
reconsideration addressed to the SRC chairman
explicitly stating the valid explanations to
Returning of the qualified NSTF manuscripts and

10 other entry requirements for further revisions
based on the listed comments and suggestions by
the SRC in the RRR.
Issuance of regional memorandum regarding

the list of qualified entries and names of official
regional delegates and other participants based on
the allowed number of representatives per region.
Final meeting of the TWG for the preparations

12
needed for the conduct of the NSTF.
Preparation of the 1-minute video presentation

13 for the regional shoutout, polo shirt uniform for
the opening program, and souvenir items for the
learners’ mixer.
Online resubmission of the digital copies of

manuscripts, other entry requirements and
PowerPoint presentation for the STEM Congress
to NSTF focal person with official endorsement by
the regional office to the central office. Deliberation of the SRC/BOJ and awarding of the
Top 3 Winners for the individual and team projects
Online pre-registration of participants on or before in each research category and the NSTF Best 8
15 Projects. Other special awards (e.g., Best Poster,
the deadline.
Best Presenter/s, Best Shoutout) and sponsored
During: honorable awards by institutions/organizations
may also be given to learners and advisors.
Registration and distribution of NSTF kits for the
official regional delegates.
After
A. Online Mentoring Phase:
Submission of the regional shoutout and three
(3) soft-bounded hard copies of color-coded
manuscripts with tags to identify the revisions Orientation of the student researchers and advisors
done based in the RRR. of the Best 8 Projects who will undergo online
mentoring/coaching in the preparations needed
Conduct of the regional poster-making activity. for the submission of entries for pre-evaluation to
International Science and Engineering Fair.
Set-up for the project display that conforms with
the display and safety regulations. Each project will be assigned to a particular set
of mentors who will be providing comments and
Project display inspection whereas the TWG may suggestions in the research plan, manuscript,
require learners to make revisions in the display and other entry requirements. Mentees will
boards in order to adhere to the prescribed rules communicate with their mentors thru e-mail and
and regulations. use the assigned project code (e.g., LS-I, LS-T,
etc.) as the subject. It is also recommended to cc
Orientation of the student participants on the the NSTF focal person and advisor in all e-mail
general guidelines and procedures for the opening threads for the monitoring of the progress of the
ceremony, learners’ mixer, on-site evaluation, STEM mentoring/coaching phase.
Congress, public viewing of exhibits, symposiums/
conferences, and awarding ceremony. Learners Clustered mentors assigned in each study will
and other official delegates are encouraged to discuss their individual comments and suggestions
participate in all NSTF activities. to agree on the set of recommendations to be
Conduct of the RSTF opening program and on-site

SRC/BOJ final evaluation of the qualified

research entries through the STEM Congress. It
is suggested for the student researchers to be in
their formal attire during the conduct of NSTF on-
site evaluation and congress.
18
provided to the assigned mentee/mentees. If there
will be dissensus among the members of the group
of mentors, the chair will mediate and interpose if
necessary.
The assigned focal person among the mentors

will communicate the recommendations to the
mentee/mentees thru e-mail in which the learners
are expected to provide responses regarding the
revisions needed.
All mentors will evaluate and deliberate on the

eight projects for the selection of the official
entries which will proceed to the cliniquing phase
to be sent to international research and innovation
competitions. It is also recommended that the
learners with the guidance of their advisors and
parents secure necessary travel requirements such
as a passport and travel clearance for minors from
the Department of Social Welfare and Development
(DSWD). DSWD also requires obtaining copies
of the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) birth
certificate and marriage certificate of parents,
affidavit of consent by both parents, affidavit
of support by sponsoring agency, passport of
companion, and official invitation from ISEF.
B. Science Camp (One-week cliniquing phase before ISEF):
The members of the Philippine Team will

undergo pre-departure orientation regarding the
preparations needed for the entry requirements
(manuscript, project plan, ISEF forms, data
logbook, certifications and/or prototype models),
travel documents, schedule of activities of the
ISEF, and other related activities.
The student researchers will undergo

communication and presentation skills
enhancement training with the mentors.
REFERENCES
20
THE FOLLOWING REFERENCES ARE USED TO

SUPPORT THE AFOREMENTIONED GUIDELINES:
International Rules for Pre-College Science Research Guidelines for Science

and Engineering Fairs 2022–2023
https://sspcdn.blob.core.windows.net/files/Documents/SEP/ISEF/2023/Rules/Book.pdf
Roles and Responsibilities of Students and Adults

https://www.societyforscience.org/isef/international-rules/roles-and-responsibilities-of-
students-and-adults/
REGENERON ISEF - Rules Wizard

https://ruleswizard.societyforscience.org
Research Plan Templates

https://www.societyforscience.org/isef/2021-resources/
International Rules for Pre-Collegiate Research: Guideline for Science and Engineering
https://sspcdn.blob.core.windows.net/files/Documents/SEP/ISEF/2023/Resources/
Changes-to-International-Rules-2022-2023.pdfb
ISEF Overview of Forms and Dates

https://www.societyforscience.org/isef/overview-of-forms-and-dates/
Intel ISEF Affiliated Fair Judging Guidelines

https://www.sefi.org/hsef/IntelISEF%20Judging%20Guidelines.pdf
ISEF Grand Award Judging Criteria

https://www.societyforscience.org/isef/grand-award/criteria/
APPENDICES
22
APPENDIX 1:
Schematic Diagram of
the Flow of STF Activities
SCHOOL LEVEL DIVISION LEVEL
Project Proponents
Division Level Division
IRB/SRC
STF Participants SRCs
Physical/Applied Science
Qualified
Projects Team Qualified
Team Project Projects
Project
BOJ
BOJ
Winners
Winners
NATIONAL LEVEL REGIONAL LEVEL
National National Level Regional Regional Level

SRCs STF Participants SRCs Participants
Qualified Qualified Team

Projects Team Projects Project
Project
BOJ BOJ
Online Evaluation and

Winners Science Cliniquing of Official Winners
Philippine Representatives
23
APPENDIX 2:
TUKLAS Research Paper Format
I. Research Plan: II. Project Data Logbook:

This is to be written prior to experimentation A project data logbook is an organizational tool
following the instructions below to detail the used by student researchers to organize and record
rationale, research questions, methodology, and narrative and evidence of the research activities
risk assessment of the proposed research. (This is including the planning, research design, drawings/
compiled separately from the rest of the research illustrations, procedures, data collection, analysis
manuscript.) and presentation, inferences, and conclusions.
All projects should include the following: a Detailed and accurate notes in paragraphs or
bullets show consistency and thoroughness which
a Rationale: Include a brief synopsis of the will be helpful when writing the research paper.
background that supports your research problem
and explain why this research is important and
if applicable, explain any societal impact of your
b It is also recommended to use hardbound record
notebooks instead of spring notebooks to avoid
research. tearing out pages, write entries using permanent
pens, and minimize erasures.
b Research Question or Problem being addressed
c Goals/Expected Outcomes/Hypotheses
c Procedures are to be presented in flow charts
and data in organized tables. Each data entry
(qualitative and quantitative) should also be
d Procedures: Detail all procedures and experimental
design to be used for data collection.
accurately recorded, dated and signed by the
supervising adult (if applicable) during the research
activity.
e Risk and Safety: Identify any potential risks and
safety precautions needed.
d Each data logbook entry should also be dated
and signed by the supervising adult (if applicable)
Data Analysis: Examine, organize, and interpret
f data to answer research questions, or either accept
during the research activity.
or reject hypotheses.
If erasures cannot be avoided, strike the word, phrase,
sentence, or figure or numbers once and countersign
g Bibliography: List at least five (5) major references
each. Avoid using correction tapes and the likes.
(e.g., science journal articles, books, internet
sites) from your literature review using the APA
style formatting and citation. If you plan to use III. Research Paper Format:
vertebrate animals, one of these references must
be an animal care reference. Science Project
1 INTRODUCTION - What relevant background

information supports your research problem/
questions?
Explain what is known or has already been done
in your research area. Include a brief review of
relevant literature. If this is a continuation project, a
brief summary of your prior research is appropriate
here. Be sure to distinguish your previous work
from this year’s project.
Include a brief description on how your project will

address an issue, concern or problem. Explain why
this research is important and any societal impact
of your research.
24
2 METHODS – What procedures were carried out Engineering Project
for the experimentation?
Explain in detail what you did. What data did you 1 INTRODUCTION - What is your engineering
collect and how did you collect those data? Discuss problem and goal?
your control group and the variables you tested. What problem were you trying to solve? Include a
description of your engineering goal.
Discuss your control group, the variables you
tested, and the statistical treatment used. Explain what is known or has already been done
Handling and disposal of wastes may be included to solve this problem, including work on which
if necessary. you may build. You may include a brief review of
relevant literature.
DO NOT include a list of materials.
If this is a continuation project, a brief summary
of your prior work is appropriate here. Be sure
3 RESULTS - What were the result(s) of your project? to distinguish your previous work from this year’s
project.
Include tables and figures which illustrate your
data. – What are your methods and
2 METHODS
procedures for building your design?
Include relevant statistical analysis of the data.
Explain what you did. How did you design and
produce your prototype? If there is a physical
4 DISCUSSION - What is your interpretation of these prototype, you may want to include pictures or
results? designs of the prototype.
What do these results mean? Compare your results
If you tested the prototype, what were your testing
with theories, published data, commonly held
procedures? What data did you collect and how
beliefs, and expected results.
did you collect that data?
Discuss possible errors. Did any questions or
DO NOT include a separate list of materials.
problems arise that you were not expecting? How
did the data vary between repeated observations
of similar events? How were results affected by
uncontrolled events?
3 RESULTS - What were the result(s) of your project?
How did your prototype meet your engineering
goal?
5 CONCLUSIONS - What conclusions did you reach?
If you tested the prototype, provide a summary of
What do these results mean in the context of the testing data tables and figures that illustrate your
literature review and other work being done in results.
your research area? How do the results address
your research question? Do your results support Include relevant statistical analysis of the data.
your hypothesis/hypotheses?
What application(s) do you see for your work?

4 DISCUSSION
results?
- What is your interpretation of these
What do these results mean? You may compare

6 REFERENCES-What are your sources? your results with theories, published data,
commonly held beliefs, and/or expected results.
This section should not exceed one page. Limit
your list to the most important references. Did any questions or problems arise that you were
not expecting? Were these problems caused by
List the references/documentation used which uncontrolled events? How did you address these?
were not of your own creation (i.e., books, journal
articles). How is your prototype an improvement or
advancement over what is currently available?
Your reference list should be written based on the
APA (American Psychological Association) style
formatting and citation. 5 CONCLUSIONS - What conclusions did you reach?
Did your project turn out as you expected?
What application(s) do you see for your work?
25
6 REFERENCES – What are your sources?
This section should not exceed one page. Limit
your list to the most important references.
List the references/documentation used which

were not of your own creation (i.e., books, journal
articles).

APA (American Psychological Association) style
formatting and citation.
Mathematics and Computer Sciences Project
1 INTRODUCTION - What is your research question?

Explain what is known or has already been done
in your research area. Include a brief review of
relevant literature.
If this is a continuation project, a brief summary of

your prior work is appropriate here. Be sure to
distinguish your previous work from this year’s
project.
2 FRAMEWORK – What is your framework? What challenges do you foresee in extending your
Introduce the concepts and notation needed to results further?
specify your research question, methods, and
results precisely. What application(s), if any, do you see for your
work?
Define relevant terms, and explain prior/
background results. (Novel concepts developed
as part of your project can be presented here or in
5 REFERENCES – What are your sources?
Section 4, as appropriate.) This section should not exceed one page. Limit
your list to the most important references.
3 FINDINGS – What are your findings and supporting
arguments? List the references/documentation used which
What did you discover and/or prove? Describe were not of your own creation (i.e., books, journal
articles).
your result(s) in detail. If possible, provide both
formal and intuitive/verbal explanations of each
major finding.
Chicago Manual of Style. For more information,
you may visit the websites below:
Describe your methods in general terms.
- http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html
- http://www.calvin.edu/library/knightcite/index.ph
Present rigorous proofs of the theory results – or,
if the arguments are long, give sketches of the
proofs that explain the main ideas. IV. Abstract:
For numerical/statistical results, include tables and The abstract should be 250 words or less. Do not
discuss specific aspects of the researchin great detail,
figures that illustrate your data. Include relevant
statistical analysis. Were any of your results including experimental procedures and statistical
statistically significant? How do you know this? methods. Anyinformation that is unnecessary to include
in a brief explanation should be saved for thewritten
research paper or the project exhibit board.
4 CONCLUSIONS - What is your assessment of your
findings? If the project is a continuation from a previous year, the
How do the results address your research question? abstract should only summarizethe current year’s work
And how have you advanced your readers’ . If it is necessary to mention supporting research from
understanding relative to what is already known? previousyear(s) , it must be minimal.
Discuss possible limitations. Did any questions If the abstract text includes special characters, such
or problems arise that you were not expecting? as mathematical symbols, which can’tbe translated
electronically, spell out the symbol.
26
Do not include acknowledgements in the abstract.
There should be no references tomentors,
institutional facilities, and awards or patents received.
Title
Finalist’s Name (or names, if a team project)
School Name, City and Region
Purpose
• An introductory statement providing background
or the reason for investigating the project topic.
• A statement of the problem the research is looking

to solve or the questions being tested.
Procedure
• A brief overview of how the investigation was
conducted, highlighting key points, and including
methods and resources used.
• Do not provide details about materials used

in the research unless they greatly influenced
APPENDIX 3:
the procedure or were needed to conduct the TUKLAS Display Board Format
investigation.
and Safety Guidelines
• An abstract should only include procedures done
by the finalist. Do not include work done by a
mentor (such as surgical procedures) or work done
Display Guidelines
prior to the Finalist’s involvement. The project display using photo paper
summarizes the research project and must focus
Observations/Data/Results on the proponent’s work for this year’s study,
• This section should provide key results that lead and if applicable, with only minimal reference
directly to the conclusions. to previous research. Tarpaulins will not be
used in any level of Science Fair competition in
• Do not include unnecessary data or observations support of the environmental advocacy of the
about the results, nor tables, charts, graphs or government in reducing the consumption of non-
other images. While these belong in the research biodegradable or non-recyclable materials.
paper or the project board, they do not belong in
the formal ISEF abstract. The safety regulations that must adhere to or
should be consistent with the guidelines set by
• Unless significant, do not include any of the
experimental design difficulties encountered in
the International Science and Engineering Fair
research. (ISEF).
The following items should be seen in the

Conclusions
project display: Abstract, Background,
• This section should be confined to a short summary Objectives, Significance, Methodology, Results
in 1-2 sentences. It is a reflection on the research and Discussion, Conclusion, Recommendations,
process and results, which may include conclusive Bibliography and if applicable, Photo Credits
ideas, important applications, and implications of (including illustrations and graphics).
the research.
• The ISEF abstract does not include a bibliography.

ISEF requires the bibliography as part of the
research plan to be provided on Form 1A.
Ethics Statement. Scientific fraud and

misconduct is not condoned at any level
ofresearch or competition. Plagiarism, use or
presentation of other research’s work as one’sown
and fabrication of data will not be tolerated.
Fraudulent projects are disqualifiedfrom the
competition.
27
Physical Project Board Dimension:
The dimensions of the project board
may not exceed 2.5 m high and 1m wide.
1 meter
PROJECT TITLE
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND RESULTS AND

2.5 meters
DISCUSSION
OBJECTIVES
CONCLUSION
SIGNIFICANCE
RECOMMENDATION
METHODOLOGY BIBLIOGRAPHY
PHOTO CREDITS
28
Research Logbook: etc.)
11. Flames or highly flammable materials
These forms do NOT need to be in this particular 12. Batteries with open-top cells
order, just present in the logbook. 13. Glass or glass objects unless deemed by the Display
1. Signed ISEF Abstract 14. & Safety Committee to be an integral and necessary
2. Signed Checklist for Adult Sponsor Form 1 part of the project
3. Student Checklist Form 1A 15 Lasers or laser pointers
4. Research Plan 16.Any apparatus deemed unsafe by the Scientific Review
5. Signed Approval Form 1B Committee, the Display & Safety Committee of the
Fair
6. All other pertinent ISEF forms
Photography/Images: Other Safety Restrictions:

Display of photographs other than that of the learner/s 1. Any inadequately insulated apparatus producing
MUST have a photo release signed by the subject, and extreme temperatures that may cause physical burns
if under 18, also by the guardian of the subject. is not allowed.
2. Any apparatus with unshielded belts, pulleys, chains, or
Any photographs, visual image, chart, table and/or
moving parts with tension or pinch points must be for
graph is allowed if:
display only.
1. It is not deemed offensive or inappropriate (which 3. Project sounds, lights, odors or any other display items
included images/photos showing vertebrate animals/ must not be distracting.
humans in surgical, necrotizing or dissection situations) 4. The Display & Safety Committee, and/or the Scientific
by the SRC, Display & Safety Committee. Review Committee in various level of the Science
2. It has a credit line of origin. Fair reserve the right to remove any project for safety
3. If it is from the Internet, magazine, newspaper, journal, reasons or to protect the integrity of the NSTF and its
etc. and a credit line is attached. rules and regulations.
4. It is a photograph or visual depiction of the finalist.
5. It is a photograph or visual depiction for which a signed
consent form is at the project.
6. Images used as backgrounds must also be credited.
Items NOT Allowed to be Displayed

with the Project:
1. Awards, medals, business cards, flags, logos, CDs,
DVDs, flash drives, brochures, booklets, endorsements,
giveaway items and/or acknowledgements (graphic or
written) unless the item(s) are an integral part of the
project.
2. Postal addresses, Internet, email, and/or social media
addresses, QR codes, telephone, and/or fax numbers
of a student.
3. Active internet or email connections as part of the
display or operating the project.
Safety Guidelines
Items NOT Allowed at the Project Display:
1. Living organisms, including plants
2. Soil, sand, rock, and/or waste samples, even if
permanently encased in acrylic
3. Taxidermy specimens or parts
4. Preserved vertebrate or invertebrate animals
5. Human or animal food
6. Human or animal parts or body fluids
7. Plant materials (living, dead or preserved) that are in
their raw, unprocessed or non-manufactured state
(Exception: manufactured construction materials
used in building the project or display)
8. All chemicals including water
9. All hazardous substances or devices (i.e.: poisons,
drugs, firearms, weapons, ammunition, reloading
devices, lasers, etc.)
10. Dry ice or other sublimating solids
Sharp items (i.e.: syringes, needles, pipettes, knives,
29
APPENDIX 4:
Sample Abstracts
2018 ISEF Second Grand Award, 2018 ISEF Third Grand Award, Earth
Energy Physical and Environmental Science
Biosorption of Manganese Mine Effluents Using

Solar-Tracking Adaptive Robot PV Panels
Crude Chitin from Shell Wastes of Philippine Bivalves
By Cadores, Keith Russel ; Rivera,

By Saquin, Elaine ; Molejona, Randy
Eugene ; Manzanero, Joscel Kent
Adviser: Ronilo Aponte
Adviser: Johnny T. Samino
The leading sources of energy globally are oil, The area around Ajuy River in Iloilo, Philippines
coal, and natural gas - fossil fuels that can be is currently being mined for manganese ore,
depleted, and whose access and use greatly and river water samples exceed the maximum
impact the environment. Hence, much study has manganese contaminant level set by US-EPA. At
been made of renewable energy sources and the same time, the surplus of local bivalve waste
use, including harnessing solar power through is another environmental concern. Studies show
a photovoltaic cell. The study aimed to improve that chemical treatment compromises water
the power harvesting and generating capacity of quality leaving toxic residues, and an alternative
photovoltaic cells by designing and building a treatment process is biosorption, or using the
solar device that mimics a flower opening when physical and chemical properties of a biomass
the sun is out, tracks the sun’s movement, closes to adsorb heavy metals in contaminated water.
when the light source is no longer detected The study aims to extract crude chitin from
and responds to humidity and temperature to shell wastes of Bractechlamys vexillum, Perna
maximize power generation. Six (6) photovoltaic viridis, and Placuna placenta and determine its
panels are mounted on a base operated by adsorption capacity on manganese in simulated
servo motors and controlled by Arduino module. and actual mine water. Crude chitin was
Electronics, servo motors, Arduino, and humidity obtained by pulverization, deproteinization,
sensors were acquired commercially. Other demineralization, and decolorization of shells.
material included those repurposed from a Biosorption by flocculation followed 5 g: 50 mL
broken umbrella and electric fan, and scrap acrylic chitin-to-water ratio. Filtrates were analyzed
sheets. The device’s performance was compared using MP-AES after 24 hours. In both actual and
to that of a fixed-mounted photovoltaic panels simulated mine water respectively, B. vexillum
at different angles. The fixed setup generated yielded the highest adsorption percentage of
4.71W while the petal panels produced 6.95W, a 91.43% and 99.58%, comparable to P. placenta of
47.72% increase. Taxing the power consumption 91.43% and 99.37%, while significantly different
of the device to the power it generates gives an to P. viridis of - 57.14% and 31.53%, (p<0.05).
average of 6.09W. This translates to a 29.29% FT-IR validated the presence of chitin in shells
improvement from the 4.71W generated by the based on carbonyl containing functional groups
fixed panel setup. T Test for Dependent Means at peaks 1530-1560 cm-1 and 1660-1680 cm-1.
was used and showed that there is a significant SEM micrographs showed the amorphous and
difference between the power generations of the non-homogenous structure of chitin. Thus, crude
two setups (p= 0.000261, a = 0.05). This robotic chitin from B. vexillum and P. placenta can be
design amplifies capacity to harness solar power bio-sorbents for water treatment of manganese-
through a photovoltaic cell. impacted effluents, and promote appropriate
waste management of local bivalves.
30
APPENDIX 5: APPENDIX 6:
Innovation Expo Display
Innovation Expo Paper Format
Board Format
Title Page and Table of Contents: The title page Create a clear and
and table of contents allow the reader to follow the Title attention-grabbing title
organization of the paper quickly. that accurately reflects
your innovation.
Introduction: Provide a brief introduction

to your innovation,
1. Features and Specifications – This describes the details Introduction highlighting its purpose
of your invention. and significance.
2. Market Trends and Opportunities – This part of the
report must include three items: what inspired you to Clearly state the problem
Problem or challenge that your
develop this invention, an explanation of what problem
Statement innovation addresses.
your invention will solve, and provide supporting details
that your invention does not exist yet. Explain what
Describe your innovative
products are already on the market that are somewhat Solution/ solution concisely and
like your invention and describe how yours differs. Innovation prominently on the poster.
Present the key features

Features and and specifications of your
Materials and Methods: Describe in detail how you
Specifications innovation using bullet
made your invention. Explain what materials were used points or visuals.
and how you put them together to make your invention.
Your report should be detailed enough so that someone Use simple visuals
Materials and or graphics to illustrate
would be able to repeat the steps and make your the materials used and
invention. Directions on how to use the invention are also Methods the steps in the
necessary here. You must include a detailed drawing(s) development process.
of your invention.
Showcase the results
of your innovation
Results and Discussion: This is the essence of your paper. Results and and compare them to
Compare your results with theoretical values, published expectations or existing
Discussion solutions. Use graphs,
data, literature and related studies, commonly held
charts, or infographics to
beliefs, and/or expected results. Include a discussion present data effectively.
of possible errors, statistics, graphs, pages with your
raw collected data, etc. How did the data vary between Emphasize the potential
repeated observations of similar events? How were your Benefits benefits of your innovation
to the target users or
results affected by uncontrolled events? What would the community.
you do differently if you repeated this project? What
other experiments should be conducted? Include images, diagrams,
and photographs
Visuals to enhance the visual
Conclusions: This discusses the potential applications, appeal and understanding
possible customer benefits, and the impact of the of your innovation.
innovation in solving problems and issues of today and Summarize the main
tomorrow. conclusions and the
Conclusions
broader implications of
Acknowledgements: This part gives credit to those who your innovation.
have assisted you, including individuals, businesses, and Discuss potential
educational or research institutions. Future future developments
Development or applications of your
innovation.
References/Bibliography: Your reference list should
be written based on the APA (American Psychological Indicate the name/s of
Association) style formatting and citation. Developers’ the proponent/s (Do not
Name indicate the name of the
school/region)
Specifications: Each Display Board must have a 38” x

48” dimensions (portrait style)
31
APPENDIX 7:
Checkpoints for SRC Review
TYPE OF FORM WHO WILL FILL OUT? WHEN TO WHEN IS IT

FILL OUT? REQUIRED?
Form 1 - Checklist for

Research Adviser Before experimentation Required for all Projects
Adult Sponsor
Form 1A - Student
All student researchers Before experimentation Required for all Projects
Checklist
Form 1B - Approval
Form
Research Plan/Project
Summary
Required if research
is conducted in a
Form 1C - Regulated regulated research
Research Institution/ Adult supervising After experimentation institution, industrial
Industrial Setting Form setting or any work
site other than home,
school or field
involves human
Form 2 - Qualified Qualified Scientist/ participants, vertebrate
Before experimentation
Scientist Form Adult Supervising animals, potentially
hazardous biological
agents and hazardous
Form 3 – Risk Student Researcher/s

Qualified Scientist/ Before experimentation Required for all Projects
Assessment Form
Adult Supervising
Student Researcher/s involves human
Form 4 – Human participant
Participants Form Institutional Review Before experimentation *if in a regulated
Board research institution use
institutional approval
forms
Form 4A – Human Student Researcher/s Required if research

Informed Consent Before experimentation involves human
Form Research Participant participant
Student Researcher/s
Required for all
Scientific Review
research involving
Form 5A – Vertebrate Committee
Before experimentation vertebrate animals
Animal Form Veterinarian
that is conducted in
Designated
a school/home/field
Supervisor/Qualified
research site
Scientist
32
TYPE OF FORM WHO WILL FILL OUT? WHEN TO WHEN IT IS

FILL OUT? REQUIRED?
Required for all

research involving
Student Researcher/s
Form 5B – Vertebrate vertebrate animals
Before experimentation
Animal Form that is conducted in
Qualified Scientist
Regulated Research
Institution
Required for
research involving
Student Researcher
microorganisms,
Form 6A – Potentially rDNA, fresh/frozen
Qualified
Hazardous Biological tissue(including primary
Scientist/Designated Before experimentation
Agents Risk cell lines, human
Supervisor
Assessment Form and other primate
established cell lines
Scientific Review
and tissue cultures),
Committee
blood, blood products,
and body fluids.
Required for research

involving fresh/frozen
tissue (including primary
cell lines, human
Student Researcher and other primate
established cell lines
Form 6B – Human and
Qualified Before experimentation and tissue cultures),
Vertebrate Animal blood, blood products
Tissue Scientist/Designated
Supervisor and body fluids. If the
research involves living
organisms, please
ensure that the proper
human or animal forms
are completed.
Required for projects

Form 7 – Continuation/ that are a continuation/
Research Progression Student Researcher Before experimentation progression in the
Projects Form same field of study as
previous project.
33
APPENDIX 8:
Learner Media Release
Consent Form
I, the undersigned, hereby grant the Department of Education - National Science

and Technology Fair the right to record, film, photograph, audiotape, or videotape
of me, my work, and performances.
I also grant to the right to edit, use, and reuse said products for nonprofit purposes
including use in print, on the internet, and all other forms of media.
I also hereby release the Department of Education and its and employees from all
claims, demands, and liabilities whatsoever in connection with the above.
I certify that I have read the Media Consent and Release Form and fully understand
its terms and conditions.
Agreed and accepted by
Signature of Learner :
Date:
Address of Learner:
Parental Consent:
I certify that I am the parent or guardian of, , a minor

under the age of eighteen years. I hereby agree to assume legal responsibility of
his/her authorizations referred to in this Form.
Parent/Guardian Signature Over Printed Name:
Address:
Date:
34
APPENDIX 9:
Non-Disclosure Agreement
Form (NDA) Form
I, , of legal age, Filipino, and with residence

address at , have accepted voluntarily the role as
SRC/Judge/Mentor/Adviser.
I understand that everything that I receive and access from the activity
is the property of and is very
confidential. Hence, I commit not to copy, reproduce, multiply, photograph,
and disseminate any part of the instruments, materials, information, and
documents. I am obligated to use the forms and materials only during the
duration of the activity based on my TOR until .
I understand that if I am found to have violated the conditions set for the
service I rendered, I will be held accountable for my actions.
CONFORME:
Signature Over Printed Name

Date:
Contact Number:
E-mail address:
Witnessed by:
35
3. Forms depending on the type of research
APPENDIX 10: (e.g. involving humans, vertebrate animals,
hazardous chemicals, etc.
Report of the Conduct
• Qualified Scientist Form (2)
of the STF Format • Risk Assessment Form (3)
• Human Participants Form (4)
The consolidated report of the conduct of the STF • Human Informed Consent Form
must be submitted to the National Science and • Vertebrate Animal Form (5A)
• Vertebrate Animal Form (5B)
Technology Fair Technical Working Group before
• Potentially Hazardous Biological Agents Risk
the conduct of the National Level Science Fair. The Assessment Form (6A)
report should include the following: • Human and Vertebrae Animal Tissue Form (6B)
• Continuation Project Form (7)
1. Title
4. Abstract (Maximum of 250 words)
2. Table of Contents The abstract should include the following:
3. Introduction/Rationale • Purpose of the experiment
• Procedure
4. Detailed Information • Data conclusion
• General information • The abstract may NOT include the following:
• SRC Deliberation (include the results, findings - Acknowledgement
and recommendations) - Work of procedures done by the mentor
• Program of Activities (day-to-day activities)
• List of Entries (include a brief profile of the
5. Research Paper
research adviser of each entry) 6. Project Evaluation Form
• List of Winners (Research & Innovation
Congress) 7. Scanned copy of the log book in PDF
• Trend Analysis (results from 3 consecutive years) format
• Financial Report
5. Conclusions
6. Recommendations
7. Appendix
APPENDIX 11:
List of Forms and Documents
Required for Submission in All
Levels of Competition
The following are the forms and manuscripts to be

submitted in ALL levels of the competition:
1. Research Plan
2. Forms for all the Projects
• Checklist for Adult Sponsor
• Student Checklist (1A)
• Research Plan (NOTE: No need to attach the
Research Plan Instructions )
• Approval Form (1B)
• Regulated Research Institutional/Industrial
Setting Form (1C)
36
APPENDIX 12:
Innovation Expo Screening Form
TITLE OF THE PROJECT
INDIVIDUAL/TEAM
PROJECT PROPONENT/S
CRITERIA WEIGHT RATING

ORIGINALITY AND CREATIVITY
This criterion assesses the uniqueness and innovation of the
project. It looks at how the research addresses a problem 35%
in a novel way or introduces creative solutions.
COMMUNITY CONNECTION & IMPACT

This criterion evaluates how the innovation research benefits the
community or society. It assesses the project’s potential to 25%
make a positive impact and address real-world issues.
MARKET ATTRACTIVENESS
This criterion examines the commercial viability of the innovation.
It considers the potential market demand, scalability, 25%
and sustainability of the project.
UTILIZATION OF PATENT INFORMATION

This criterion focuses on how well the project utilizes relevant 15%
patent information and avoids infringement on existing patents.
TOTAL 100%
COMMENTS

Date Signed:
37
APPENDIX 13:
Innovation Expo Judges Form
TITLE OF THE PROECT
INDIVIDUAL/TEAM
PROJECT PROPONENT/S
CRITERIA WEIGHT RATING

ORIGINALITY AND CREATIVITY
This criterion assesses the uniqueness and innovation of the
project. It looks at how the research addresses a problem
25%
in a novel way or introduces creative solutions.
COMMUNITY CONNECTION & IMPACT
This criterion evaluates how the innovation research benefits the
community or society. It assesses the project’s potential to make 20%
a positive impact and address real-world issues.
MARKET ATTRACTIVENESS
This criterion examines the commercial viability of the innovation.
It considers the potential market demand, scalability, 15%
and sustainability of the project.
FUNCTIONALITY AND
TECHNOLOGY VALIDATION
This criterion evaluates the practical functionality and
performance of the innovation. It assesses how well the 25%
innovation functions in real-world scenarios and whether
it meets the intended objectives. Researchers should
demonstrate evidence of successful testing, validation, or
prototypes to support the claims of the innovation’s effectiveness.
PRESENTATION AND
PRODUCT PRESENTATION
This criterion looks at how effectively the innovation and
research are presented to the audience. It assesses the clarity,
coherence, and visual appeal of the poster display and any
supplementary materials. Additionally, researchers’ ability to
15%
communicate the innovation’s key features, benefits, and impact
in a compelling and engaging manner is considered. The criterion
also considers how well the researchers answer questions and
engage with expo attendees during their presentation.
TOTAL
COMMENTS:

Date Signed:
38
APPENDIX 14:
Official List of
Participants Template
This template is to be used in the official endorsement of the

school to division, division to region, and region to national.
Region: Division:
First Middle Last Grade School Team/ Team Research

No. Gender Category
Name Name Name Level Name Individual Code Adviser
Data Total Data
Total No. of Robotics and Intelligent Machines

Total No. of Female
Project Entries
Total No. of Mathematics and Computer

Total No. of Male
Sciences Project Entries
Total No. of Participating Schools Total No. of Grade 7 Student Participants
Total No. of Participating Private Schools Total No. of Grade 8 Student Participants
Total No. of Participating SP STEM Schools Total No. of Grade 9 Student Participants
Total No. of Participating SP STEM Male Student Total No. of Grade 10 Student Participants
Total No. of Participating SP STEM Female

Total No. of Grade 11 Student Participants
Student
Total No. of Individual Project Entries Total No. of Grade 12 Student Participants
Total No. of Mathematics and Computer

Total No. of Team Project Entries
Sciences Project Entries
Total No. of Life Sciences Project Entries Total No. of Participating Teachers
Total No. of Physical Sciences Project Entries
Prepared by:
Mobile No:
School/Office Address:
Regional Coordinator:
39
APPENDIX 15:
Suggested Timeline of Activities for
the Conduct of Research Projects
ACTIVITIES
May-June Preliminaries
• Refine and finalize research project plan
• Carry out risk assessment and plan for precautionary measures to minimize
hazards involved in the conduct of the research project
• Communicate with the parent/guardian of researchers and secure a signed
consent which allows the learner/s to conduct the research project
• Check the attainability and availability of materials/test subjects, laboratories/
facilities, protocols/procedures, and experts in the field
• Submission of letter of intent for collaboration with higher education
institutions/research institutions
• Submission of memorandum of agreement/understanding, research project
• plan, list of materials and equipments to be used, timeline of activities, and
budget plan to research institution and qualified scientist
• Revision of research project plan (if needed)
• Preparation of International Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF) forms and
data logbook
• Secure Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) permit (for
studies which will be using vertebrate animals) and IRB/SRC approval forms
June-July • Preparation and collection of materials

• Conduct of experimentation (e. g. Plant/Animal Identification/Authentication,
Extraction Procedures, Preparation of Treatments, Material/Product
Development, Pre-screening Tests, Testing Proper, Waste Disposal)
• Data Collection and Analysis
August-September • Writing of the Research Paper (Introduction, Methodology, and Results and
Discussion)
• Preparation of requirements for LSTF SRC screening (manuscript, ISEF forms,
data logbook, display board)
• Local Science and Technology Fair
September-October • Submission of school entries for DSTF SRC screening

• Division Science and Technology Fair SRC Screening
• Announcement of Qualified Entries for DSTF
• Submission of revised copies of manuscript marked with tags based on the
SRC recommendations/ suggestion and other documents
• Division Science and Technology Fair
October-November • Submission of division entries for RSTF SRC screening
• Regional Science and Technology Fair SRC Screening
• Announcement of Qualified Entries for RSTF
• Regional Science and Technology Fair
December • Submission of regional entries for NSTF SRC screening
January • National Science and Technology Fair SRC Screening

• Announcement of Qualified Entries for NSTF
February-March • National Science and Technology Fair

• Announcement of National Level STF Winners
April • Science Cliniquing

• Preparation for travel requirements (DSWD travel clearance, passport, and
others)
May • International Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF)
41
APPENDIX 16:
Project Labeling and Coding
Digital copies of manuscripts and forms must be submitted in this format
Example:
CONTENT OF THE FOLDER SAMPLE CONTENT OF THE

FOLDER CODE FOLDER FOR FORMS
LS-I-RO1 Manuscript:
science- LS-I-RO1-School Name

individual-region 1
Folder containing the LS-I-RO1-Form1
needed forms:
LS-I-RO1-Forms
LS-I-RO1-Form 2
LS-I-RO1-Logbook
necessary forms are found
CODES COLOR CODING

LS-I GREEN
LS-T YELLOW
PS-I BLUE
PS-T ORANGE
RIM-I PINK
RIM-T BROWN
MCS-I RED
MCS-T PURPLE
42
APPENDIX 17:
End of Activity Report Format for the Regional/
Division/School Science and Technology Fair
The End of Activity Report for the Regional/Division/School

Science and Technology Fair should contain the following sections:
1. Title Page: Include the name of the region/division and a clear,

concise title for the report.
2. Table of Contents: List all the sections of the report and their
corresponding page numbers to help readers navigate the
document.
3. General Information: Provide a broad overview of the

fair, including its purpose, goals, and objectives, as well as
information on its structure, participants, and timeline.
4. Results: Present the results of the fair, including statistics

and data related to the number of entries, participants, and
winners, as well as any trends or patterns observed.
5. List of Activities Conducted: Provide a detailed list of the

activities conducted during the fair, including dates, locations,
and participants.
List of Entries: Provide a list of all entries submitted to the fair,
including the title, author, and category.
6. List of Winners: List the winners of the fair, including the title,
author, and category.
7. Financial Report: Provide a detailed financial report of the

fair, including expenditures and income, as well as any funding
sources.
8. Conclusions: Summarize the main findings and conclusions of

the fair, and provide recommendations for future action.
9. Recommendations: Provide specific recommendations for

future action, based on the findings of the fair, and identify
areas for improvement.
10. Appendix: Include any additional materials, such as detailed

data tables, charts, or other relevant documents, that support
the findings of the report.
43
APPENDIX 18:
Review & Recommendation Report
Project Title:
Fair Division: [ ] Life Science [ ] Physical Science [ ] Robotics and Intelligent Machines
[ ] Mathematics and Computational Science
Category: [ ] Individual [ ] Team
Instruction: Please put a check [] in the appropriate column and if necessary, write recommendations on the space provided.
PART 1: REQUIRED FORMS

COMPLETE INCOMPLETE RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR ALL RESEARCHES
1. Checklist for Adult Sponsor (1).

Is it accomplished and signed?
2. Student Checklist 1A.

Is it complete and signed?
If answer to item 5 is YES, must also have Form 7 (See Part II, item 13 below)
If answer to item 7 is Research Institution or Other, must also have Form IC (See Part II, item 6 below)
3. Research Plan. (Attachment to

item 2 above). Does it include
the following:
A. Rationale. Does it Include

a synopsis of background
information that supports the
research problem and explains
why the research is important
scientifically? If applicable, does
it explain the societal impact of
the research?
B. HYPOTHESIS(ES), RESEARCH
QUESTION(S), ENGINEERING
GOAL(S), EXPECTED
OUTCOMES. Is this based on
RATIONALE?
C. RESEARCH METHODS AND

CONCLUSIONS.
a. Procedures.
i. Does it show all procedures
and experimental designs,
including methods for data
collection?
ii. There should be NO
inclusion of work of mentor
or others.
iii. Parameters should NOT
be too strict to allow for
possible changes.
44
b. Risk and Safety. Does it
identify all potential risks and
safety precautions needed?
c. Data Analysis.
i. Does it describe all
procedures for data analysis?
ii. Parameters should NOT
be too strict to allow for
possible changes.
D.BIBLIOGRAPHY. Does it have at

least 5 major references? If using
vertebrate animals, include 1
reference on animal care. (American
Psychological Association)
Note: Items 3.E-H are needed ONLY for researches on HUMAN PARTICIPANTS, VERTEBRATE ANIMAL, POTENTIALLY
HAZARDOUS BIOLOGICAL AGENTS (see attached Research Plan/Project Summary Instructions)
E. HUMAN PARTICIPANTS
RESEARCH. Does it provide for
the following?
a. Description
b. Recruitment
c. Methods
d. Risk Assessment
e. Protection of Privacy
f. Informed Consent Process
F. VERTEBRATE ANIMAL
the following?
a. Potential ALTERNATIVES to
vertebrate animal use
b. Potential impact or
contribution of research
c. Detailed procedures
d. Detail animal numbers, strain,
sex , age, source, etc.
e. Describe housing and
oversight of daily care
f. Disposition of animals at study
termination
G.POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS
BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
the following?
a. Biosafety Level (BSL)
Assessment and
Determination
b. Source of agent, specific cell
line.
c. Safety precautions
d. Methods of disposal
4. Approval Form 1B (for ALL

students)
5. Abstract
VERY IMPORTANT: See Part II, Risk Assessment (3) for
Studies involving protists, archaea and similar microorganisms.
Research using manure for composting, fuel production, or other non-culturing experiments.
Commercially-available color change coliform water test kits. These kits must remain sealed and must be properly
disposed.
Studies involving decomposition of vertebrate organisms (such as in forensic projects).
Studies with microbial fuel cells.
PART 2: ADDITIONAL
REQUIRED FORMS
6. Regulated Research
Institutional or Industrial
Setting Form (1C). Must
be completed AFTER
experimentation by the adult
supervising the student research
conducted in a regulated
research institution or any work
site aside from home, school or
field.
Is it properly accomplished and
signed by the DESIGNATED
SUPERVISING ADULT?
7. Qualified Scientist Form (2) -

for researches with human
participants, vertebrate animals,
potentially hazardous biological
agents, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA)-controlled
substances; completed and
signed BEFORE start of
experimentation.
Is it properly accomplished
and signed by the QUALIFIED
SCIENTIST?
8. Risk Assessment Form (3) –

for researches using hazardous
chemicals, activities or
devices and microorganisms
exempt from pre-approval.
Must be completed BEFORE
experimentation.
Is it properly accomplished
and signed by DESIGNATED
SUPERVISING ADULT OR
QUALIFIED SCIENTIST (when
applicable)?
9. Human Participants Form (4) –

for researches involving human
participants not at a Regulated
Research Institution.
Did the DESIGNATED ADULT
SUPERVISOR/INSTITUTION
approve the research BEFORE
experimentation?
46
10. Vertebrate Animal Form
(5A) – for researches involving
vertebrate animals that is
conducted in a school/home/
field research site.
A. Is it properly accomplished,
approved and signed by SRC
BEFORE experimentation?
B. Is it properly accomplished,
approved and signed by
DESIGNATED VETERINARIAN
C. Is it properly accomplished,
DESIGNATED SUPERVISOR
OR QUALIFIED SCIENTIST
(as applicable) BEFORE
experimentation?
11. Vertebrate Animal Form

(5B) – for researches involving
vertebrate animals that is
conducted at a Regulated
Research Institution.
A. Does it have IACUC approval
a QUALIFIED SCIENTIST/
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR?
12. Potentially Hazardous

Biological Agents Risk
Assessment Form (6A) –
for researches involving
microogranisms, rDNA, fresh/
frozen tissue (including primary
cell lines, human and other
primate established cell lines
and tissue cultures), blood,
blood products and body fluids.
A. Does it have SRC/IACUC/
Institutional Biosafety
Committee (IBC) approval
approved and signed by a
QUALIFIED or DESIGNATED
SUPERVISOR BEFORE
experimentation?
C. Is it properly accomplished,
approved and signed by the
SRC BEFORE experimentation?
D. Human Vertebrate Animal
Tissue Form (6B) – for
researches involving fresh/
frozen tissue (including primary
cell lines, human and other
primate established cell lines
and tissue cultures), blood,
blood products and body
fluids. If research involves living
organisms, ensure that the
proper human or animal forms
are completed. All researches
using any tissue listed above
must also complete Form 6A.
Is it properly accomplished,
approved and signed by a
QUALIFIED or DESIGNATED
SUPERVISOR BEFORE
experimentation?
13. Continuation/Research
Progression Projects Form
(7) – for researches that are
a continuation/progression in
the same field of study as a
previous research.
A. 13.This form MUST be
accompanied by the
PREVIOUS YEAR’S ABSTRACT
and RESEARCH PLAN
approved and signed by the
student/s?
PART 3: RESEARCH PAPER

(See attached IMRAD Format)
1. COVER PAGE
A. Is the research title present?
B. Part 3 1 B: Is/Are the name/s
of the student proponent/s
present?
C. Is/Are the appropriate
persons credited? (The
Research adviser and
Research Consultants, if
applicable MUST be present)
2. INTRODUCTION
Does it outline the research
question and its significance
within the topic discussed,
making its relevance clear to
readers in a CONCISE manner?
3. METHOD
Does it clearly and
comprehensively provide the
reader with a description of the
methods used in the research?
4. RESULTS
Does it clearly and
comprehensively SHOW the
reader what the research came
up with? This should be the
MAIN section of the paper.
5. DISCUSSION
Does this show what the
findings in RESULTS mean?
6. LIMITATIONS ON THE
RESEARCH DESIGN AND
MATERIAL
Does this show knowledge
and understanding of research
limitations?
7. CONCLUSION, NOTES,
WORKS CITED AND
APPENDICES/BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Does the conclusion briefly
and clearly analyze what the
paper proposed, discussed
and concluded?
B. Are there (in MLA format)
possible Researcher Notes,
the research paper’s Works
Cited, and Appendices?
PART 4: RESEARCH ABSTRACT

(MAX. 250 WORDS)
1. Does it clearly and concisely

state the PURPOSE OF THE
RESEARCH?

state the PROCEDURE/S
undertaken in the RESEARCH?

state the DATA collected from
the RESEARCH?
4. 4.Does it clearly and concisely

state the CONCLUSIONS OF
THE RESEARCH?
VERY IMPORTANT: There should be NONE of the following:
Self-promotions and external endorsements
PART 5: RESEARCH LOGBOOK COMPLETE INCOMPLETE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Is the logbook intact and not

tampered with? It should NOT
be loose-leafed.
2. Does the START DATE in the

logbook match the START DATE
in Student Checklist (1A)?
3. Does the END DATE in the

logbook match the END DATE
in Student Checklist (1A)?
4. Are all the entries in the

logbook properly dated?
5. Does the logbook show

accurate and detailed notes and
findings throughout the course
of the research? Does it include
data tables, and the like?
6. Does the logbook show

accurate and detailed
description of procedures and
processes conducted in the
course of the research?
7. Does the logbook show student

notes and questions in the
course of the research?
[ ] Qualified [ ] Disqualified Reviewed by: Date:
Reason/s for Disqualification:
50
APPENDIX 19:
Project Evaluation Form
Title of Research Project: Code:
Fair Division: [ ] Life Science [ ] Physical Science [ ] Robotics and Intelligent Machines
[ ] Mathematics and Computational Science Category: [ ] Individual [ ] Team
CATEGORY SCORE
1. CREATIVE ABILITY (30)

1. Does the project show creative ability and originality in the:
a. questions asked?
b. approach to solving the problem?
c. analysis of the data?
d. interpretation of the data?
e. use of equipment?
f. construction or design of new equipment
2. Creative research should support an investigation and help answer a question in an original
way.
3. A creative contribution promotes an efficient and reliable method for solving a problem.
When evaluating project, it is important to distinguish between gadgeteering and ingenuity.
2. SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT (30)

(If an engineering project, please see 2b Engineering Goals.)
1. Is the problems stated clearly?
2. Was the problem sufficiently limited to allow plausible approach? Good scientists can identify
important problems capable of solutions.
3. Was there a procedural plan for obtaining a solution?
4. Are the variable clearly recognized and defined?
5. If controls were necessary, did the student recognize their need and were they used
correctly?
6. Are there adequate data to support the conclusions?
7. Does the finalist/team recognize the data’s limitations?
8. Does the finalist/team understand the project’s ties to related research?
9. Does the finalist/team have an idea of what further research is warranted?
10. Did the finalist/team cite scientific literature, or only popular literature (e.g. local
newspapers, Readers Digest)?
ENGINEERING GOALS
1. Does the project have a clear objective?
2. Is the objective relevant to the potential user’s needs?
3. Is the solution: workable? Acceptable to the potential user? Economically feasible?
4. Could the solution be utilized successfully in design or construction of an end product?
5. Is the solution a significant improvement over previous alternatives or application?
6. Has the solution been tested for performances under the conditions of use?
3. THOROUGHNESS (15)
1. Was the purpose carried out to completion within the scope of the original intent?
2. How completely was the problem covered?
3. Are the conclusions based on a single experiment or replication?
4. How complete are the project notes?
5. Is the finalist/team aware of other approaches or theories?
51
6. How much time did the finalist or team spend on the project?
7. Is the finalist/team familiar with scientific literature in the studied field?
8. Are the relevant details (including the pages and dates) of the experiment recorded in the
research data logbook?
4. SKILL (15)
1. Does the finalist/team have the required laboratory, computation, observational and design
skills to obtain the supporting data?
2. Where was the project performed (i.e. home, school laboratory, university laboratory)
Did the student or team receive assistance from parents, teachers, scientists or engineers?
3. Was the project completed under adult supervision, or did the student/team work largely
alone?
4. Where did the equipment come from? Was it built independently by the finalist or team?
Was it obtained on loan? Was it part of a laboratory where the finalist/team worked?
5. CLARITY (10)
1. How clearly does the finalist or team discuss his/her/their project and explain the
purpose, procedure, and conclusions? Watch out for memorized speeches that reflect little
understanding of principles.
2. Does the written material reflect the finalist’s or team’s understanding of the research?
3. Are the important phases of the project presented in an orderly manner?
4. How clearly is the data presented?
5. How clearly are the results presented?
6. How well does the project display explain the project?
7. Was the presentation done in a forthright manner, without tricks or gadgets?
Did the finalist/team perform all the project work, or did someone help?
TOTAL
Signature Over Printed Name of Judge
52
NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FAIR (NSTF)

BOARD OF JUDGES – INDIVIDUAL SCORE SHEET
PHYSICAL SCIENCE - INDIVIDUAL
CRITERIA
Code RESEARCH PROJECT TILE Creative Scientific Thoroughness Skill Clarity TOTAL
Ability Thought
30 30 15 15 10
(Signature over printed name)

Judge
NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FAIR (NSTF)
BOARD OF JUDGES CONSOLIDATED SCORE SHEET
PHYSICAL SCIENCE – TEAM
Code RESEARCH PROJECT TITLE JUDGE 1 JUDGE 2 JUDGE 3 TOTAL RANK
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)
Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3
Date Signed: Date Signed: Date Signed:
53
SCHOOL, DIVISION, REGION, AND NATIONAL
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FAIR GUIDEBOOK
First Edition | May 2022
Bureau of Curriculum and Development
DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue, Pasig City 1600
633-7216/ 638-8634 | www.deped.gov.ph

DRAFTUNSIGNEDNSTFHANDBOOK2023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DRAFTUNSIGNEDNSTFHANDBOOK2023

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DRAFTUNSIGNEDNSTFHANDBOOK2023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SCHOOL, DIVISION,

Copyright © 2023 Department of Education

For permission requests, please contact the Department of Education

III. FAIR FEATURES 7

TUKLAS: A Research Project Fair

IV. A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE TO STEM RESEARCH INVESTIGATION 7

V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 8

VI. CONTEST MECHANICS 11

VII. GENERAL PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 12

Through NSTF, thousands of learners are challenged to

Provide an avenue for high school learners to

Foster a culture of creativity and innovation among the

Promote STEM awareness and interest among learners,

Provide an opportunity for collaboration and establish

STEM ACADEMY AGHAMBAYANIJUAN

2 Gather relevant information to better understand

3 Identify research gaps and ways to address

4 Develop specific research questions and variables.

5 Formulate hypotheses and predict expected

6 Choose appropriate and ethical research

7 Write a project plan with the help of an adviser or

Presents the project display poster and answers questions

Monitors the conduct of research activities within

Allows student researcher consultation during the most

Checks the correct usage, syntax, and grammar of

Guides student researcher in choosing the appropriate

Conducts local oral defense presentations and provides

Ensures that the learner is physically, emotionally, and

Can also serve as the adult sponsor if the abovementioned

Needed for research involving human participants,

Must be thoroughly familiar with ethical and safety

Reviews and provides comments and suggestions to

Reviews and completes the required documentation in

May or may not come from the RRI where experimentation

Ensures the proper training of student researchers and/

May also serve as the adult sponsor for the project.

If the project involves the use of vertebrate animals, the

Provides direct supervision during conduct of the

Reviews and completes the required documentation in

SCIENTIFIC REVIEW COMMITTEE (SRC)

Orientation of SRC members regarding the national

Must be thoroughly familiar with ethical and safety

Checks and evaluates student research project,

a. Evidence of literary research

NOTE: To avoid conflict of interest, no adult sponsor, parent or

Learners may work individually or in teams with 2-3 members

The top three (3) winners in each category of TUKLAS will

Robotics and Intelligent Machines

This category deals with the design, implementation,

Issuance of school memorandum regarding the

It is also suggested for the student researchers to

Set-up for the project display that conforms with

Project Display inspection by the assigned TWGs

Conduct of the SSTF opening program and on-site

SRC/BOJ final evaluation of the qualified research

Deliberation of the SRC/BOJ and awarding of the

Orientation of the student researchers and

Issuance of school memorandum regarding the

Final revision of the manuscripts and other entry