Lesson 3 Lecture
Lesson 3 Lecture
Introduction
Good tests do not happen overnight. In order to assure the test quality, a
teacher has to prepare the test at least two weeks before the scheduled
examination.
This lesson will introduce to you the nature of teacher-made tests and give
you the bird’s eye view of the whole process of developing tests. The succeeding
two lessons, namely Lessons 4 and 5, will discuss elaborately the development of
different item formats to match the learning targets that you want to assess.
bjectives
Teacher-made tests are the ones prepared by classroom teachers and generally
refereed to as paper-and-pencil tests. These tests usually focused on assessing the
cognitive aspects of student learning. These are the type of tests that teachers employ to
measure achievement in the form of quizzes, unit test or periodical examinations.
Most teacher-made tests fall into two categories: objective tests and essay tests.
Objective tests require the student to supply a specific and brief answer, usually
one or two words; essay tests require the student to organize and express an answer in his
or her own words and do not restrict the student to a list of responses. Objective tests
require only one possible correct answer while essay tests may have several correct
responses.
An essay test usually consists of a few questions, each requiring a lengthy answer.
An objective test consists of many questions, each taking little time to answer. Content
validity and reliability are likely to be observable in objective tests. Essay tests provide
an opportunity for high-level thinking skills while most objective tests emphasize low-
level thinking or memorization. The quality of an objective test depends primarily on the
skill of the test writer, while the quality of essay test depends mainly on the skill of the
person grading the test (Ornstein, 1990).
1. Essay tests
a. Restricted type
b. Extended type
2. Objective tests
Recall type
a. Simple recall
b. Completion
Recognition type
a. Alternative Response/Binary Test
b. Multiple Choice
c. Matching Type
d. Rearrangement
e. Analogy
f. Identification
The summary of relative advantages and disadvantages of objective and essay
tests is presented below.
Test construction does not only involve writing the test items, give to students
and score the papers. It requires several procedures that require reflective and creative
thinking to ensure quality assessment. The following are the general steps in
constructing teacher-made tests.
Teachers who are already in the service for years may already have an item bank
which may be an accumulation of the tests already made in the past. The item bank is a
great help for them because it can be a direct source of items for the test. However, for a
beginner test writer like you, it is always important that you consider the objectives of
each lesson included in the test. From the list of objectives of each lesson, you will be
able to make Table of Specification (TOS) more easily.
The six levels are categorized into two: lower order thinking skills (LOTS)
namely, remembering, understanding and applying; and higher order thinking skills
(HOTS) which include analyzing, evaluating and creating (Pohl, 2000).
1. Remembering which requires the learners to recall information. LOTS makes use of
the behavioral verbs like recognize, list, describe, retrieve, name and find.
6. Creating means generating new ideas, products, or ways of viewing things which is
illustrated by the behavioral verbs like design, construct, plan, produce and invent.
Summarized below are the behavioral objectives under each level of thinking
skills.
Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)
Remembering Understanding Applying Analyzing Evaluating Creating
*** The K-12 curriculum makes use of spiral progression in the concept development of
each lesson. Meaning, the topics on Volcanoes and Earthquakes are discussed from Grade 6
up to Grade 10, from simplest to complex concepts, with additional information and complexity
as the grade level progresses.
Assessment is aimed at helping students learn more and perform well in relation to the
learning standards. Learning standards are concise, written descriptions of what students are
expected to know and be able to do at a specific stage of their education.Learning standards
comprises the a) content standard, b) process standard and c) learning competencies. Each
lesson has content and process standards and learning competencies.
Content standards identify and set the essential knowledge and understanding that the
learners should know. It answers the question, “What should the learners know?”
Process standards, on the other hand, describe the abilities and skills that learners
are expected to demonstrate in relation to the content standards and integration of 21st-
century skills. It answers the following questions: 1. "What can learners do with what they
know?"; 2. "How well must learners do their work?"; 3 "How well do learners use their
learning or understanding in different situations?"; 4. "How do learners apply their
learning or understanding in real-life contexts?“; and 5. "What tools and measures should
learners use to demonstrate what they know?"
Learning competencies refer to the knowledge, understanding, skills, and attitudes that
students need to demonstrate in every lesson and/ or learning activity.
Here are examples of behavioral objectives under each level.
The Table of Specification (TOS) or test blueprint guides the item writer in
writing the test. It ensures content validity and the alignment of objectives with the items
in the test.
For elementary tests, the 60-30-10 principle, meaning 60 easy, 30 moderate and
10 difficult questions, is followed. However, it would be more convenient if the levels of
thinking skills will be used in specifying the items in the test. In the first place, these
levels were considered in writing test objectives, therefore, it is deemed appropriate to
use them again in ascertaining whether the objectives are achieved or not. If test
objectives are already done, it is easier to construct TOS because you will just filter out
the number of objectives to be included in the test and from which you will base your
questions on.
As a guide, we may consider the idea of creating more LOTS for younger pupils
and more HOTS for older ones. In the following example, the percentage of items for
elementary is 70-30, meaning 70% LOTS and 30% HOTS.
First, decide for the number of items to be included in the test. You may also
consider the time allotment and the coverage of the test. For example, you have decided
to create a 30-item test which covers three chapters.
Next, you have to divide 30 by the percentage you will allot for LOTS and HOTS.
If you are preparing elementary tests using the 70-30 principle, you have to:
a. Multiply 30 by 0.70 = 21 items. Distribute 21 items among remembering (R),
(U) understanding and (Ap) applying. For instance, you have allotted 11, 7
and 3, for R,U and Ap, respectively.
b. Under R, distribute 11 items among 3 chapters, considering the coverage or
scope of each chapter. In the example, the number of asterisks marks the
coverage of each chapter; the more asterisks the broader the coverage. For
instance, the 11 items that will assess remembering is distributed to Chapter 1
(4 items), Chapter 2 (6 items) and Chapter 3 (1 item). Do the same procedure
in distributing number of items for U and Ap.
c. Next, multiply 30 by 0.30 = 9 items. Distribute the 9 items under Analyzing
(An), Evaluating (E) and Creating (C). For example, you have equally divided
the 9 items among the three levels, giving you 3, 3 and 3. Distribute the items
based on the coverage of each chapter. Similarly, distribute the items to each
chapter coverage. In the example, 1 item is assigned to each chapter.
d. Sum up the number of items under each level of thinking skills. This will give
you the number of items under each level.
e. Sum up the number of items across each chapter. This will give you the
number of items under each chapter.
f. Get the percentage of items per chapter by simply dividing the number of
items by 30.
g. For the item placement, decide where in the test the items will be placed. As
a general rule, easy items should come first . Using the Revised Bloom’s
Taxonomy, easier items are the lower-order thinking skills.
The sample TOS below follows 70-30 principle. The asterisks indicate that Chapter 2 has
the broadest coverage, followed by Chapter 1; and Chapter 3 has the shortest coverage.
Number of 11 7 3 3 3 3 30
items
% of items 70% 30% 100%
Another example of a TOS below consists of 30 items and intended for high school
students. It follows the principle of 30-70, which gives 30% LOTS and 70% HOTS. This
puts more emphasis on the development of higher order thinking skills among high
school learners.
After the test objectives and TOS are prepared, we will now translate the
objectives into questions. This ensures appropriate match of questions with the objectives
set. As Pohl (2000) stressed out that questions should be used purposefully to achieve
well-defined goals. He categorized questions into two levels: lower level and higher level.
Lower level questions are those at the remembering, understanding and lower
level application of the taxonomy. Usually questions at the lower levels are appropriate
for:
Evaluating students’ preparation and comprehension
Diagnosing students’ strengths and weaknesses
Reviewing and/or summarizing content
Higher level questions, on the other hand, are those requiring complex application,
analysis, evaluation or creation skills. Questions at higher levels of the taxonomy are
usually most appropriate for:
2. give the different parts of a volcano 2. What do you call the part of volcano
where magma flows out?
3. recall the different types of volcano 3. Which volcano erupts continuously?
8. apply the concept of rescuing during 8. How can you rescue a person who was
Earthquakes sandwiched between collapsed concrete
wall and floor?
9. complete the given characteristics of 9. The Mt. Arayat in Pampanga was found to
a dormant volcano have erupted hundreds of years ago. Is there
a possibility that it will erupt again?
Analyzing (11 items, 10- 20) For 10-16, identify the intensity of earthquake
described in each statement:
10-16 analyze the given events 10. The earthquake does not felt by people
according to the intensity of 11. The buildings collapsed. The roads
earthquake cracked. Trees fell down. The whole
cities are destroyed.
12. The walls of the houses fell down.
13. The ground shook as if a big truck had
gone past.
14. The grounds cracked. Some buildings fell
down.
15. The earthquake was felt by lots of people.
16. The earthquake did not disturb anyone.
Some cockroaches went out of the
ground cracks.
17-20 identify the types of volcanoes For 17-20, identify the type of volcanoes
based on characteristics described.
21. choose the best action to do during 21. Which is the best action to do during
earthquakes earthquake?
22. choose the best action to do during 22. Which is the best action to do during
volcanic eruption volcanic eruption?
23. evaluate the importance of readiness 23. Which is the most important value of
during natural calamities readiness during natural calamities?
24-26. decide which is the most 24-26. Decide on the appropriateness of action
appropriate action to take during taken during volcanic eruption.
volcanic eruption (sample actions/measures during
volcanic eruption)
27-30. predict the future events given the 27. The rain never stops from falling down the
situations whole night and day.
28. The cockroaches and rats seemed to be
disturbed and went out of their hiding
places.
29. The volcano continuously blows out heavy
smoke and the ground shakes from time to
time.
30. The earthquake shook the ground heavily.
The water in the sea seemed to dry for a while.
c. Selecting the Appropriate Item Format
According to Mehrens and Lehmann (1973), there are six factors to consider in
choosing between objective and essay tests.
Ornstein (1990) stressed that in order to write an appropriate test the teacher must
obviously know the course content. But knowledge of content is not enough. The teacher
must be able to translate the objectives of the course into test items that will distinguish
between students who know the material and who do not, and that will measure
qualitative differences (preferably in higher-order thinking) related to the course as well
as knowledge.
In guiding you to choose the best item formats to use, here is the summary of
relative advantages of essay and objective tests over the other (Ornstein, 1990):
After you have developed test items, they need to be put together in the form of a
test. The following guidelines should be considered:
a. Directions- test directions may include the purpose, time allowed for completing the
test, basis for responding, procedures for recording answers, what to do with guessing
and how constructed-response items will be scored. The direction should be brief, clear
and complete with the information needed by the students to properly respond to each
item format of the test.
Examples:
1. TRUE OR FALSE. On your answer sheet, write T if the statement is true or F if false.
Do not guess, right-minus-wrong scheme will be employed. (10 points)
2. MULITPLE CHOICE. On the space provided before each item write the letter of the
correct answer. Avoid erasures. Erasures will be considered incorrect. (1 point for
every correct answer = 20 points)
b. Test arrangement – arranging the items from easiest to most difficult has little effect
on the results. The most important consideration is item type. Items answered more
quickly would generally come first, and keep all items in one section of the whole test.
c. Physical layout of the test- test items should be formatted in such a way that they are
easy to read and answer. Do not crowd too many items in a single page.
The following rating scale may be used to evaluate the administration of test.
Direction: Using the scale 1-5, 5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest, please rate the performance
of the test examiner by putting a check (/) under appropriate scale.
Legend: 5 = Excellent
4= Very Good
3 = Good
2 = Fair
1 = Needs Improvement
Scale 1 2 3 4 5
1. Pleasant in physical appearance
2. Speaks fluently and loudly; enough to be heard by the students
3. Administers the test in a place familiar to the students
4. Provides comfortable environment conducive to testing (checks
lights, fans, sitting arrangement, floors)
5. Arranges the students one-sit-apart and free from books and
notebooks
6. Gives complete and clear direction before the test starts
7. Corrects typographical error, if there is any, before the test begins
8. Has a systematic plan in the distribution of test materials
9. Writes on the board the time the test was started and the time it will
end
10. Does not allow the students to leave the examination room unless
for personal necessities
11. Does not entertain questions about the direction while the test is in
progress
12. Courteous in dealing with the students and the teacher
13. Collects the test materials carefully and quickly after the test
14. Leaves the room clean and orderly.