CSTR End TermNotes
CSTR End TermNotes
CSTR End TermNotes
Corporate strategy- captures a set of choices that a corporation makes to create value through
configuration and coordination of its multi-market activities. Pertains to the whole organization.
Find synergy for the whole corporation.
Competitive strategy- a set of choices confined to a single market. Corporate strategy, if
designed and executed well, will increase business units’ competitive advantage over and above
what they could otherwise achieve.
Corporate scope- the markets in which the corporation has chosen to maintain a competitive
presence.
Porter’s Tests (of Value Creation):
o Better off Test- does the presence of the corporation in the market improve the total
competitive advantage of business units over and above what they could achieve on
their own?
o Attractiveness test & Cost of Entry test usually cancel out each other, so Better Off Test
is used.
o Value can also be created by restructuring, transferring resources & economies of scope
Ownership Test- Does ownership of the business unit produce a greater competitive advantage
than an alternative arrangement would produce?
Horizontal Diversification- simultaneous ownership of two or more units that utilize a similar set
of tangible and intangible resources
Economies of Scope- exists if the total cost of producing two goods jointly is less than the
combined cost of producing each product separately.
o Multi-purpose tangible/intangible assets can be used for this.
o It can increase WTP for products as firms provide a one-stop solution for multiple
products (eg: IBM, Honda, etc)
Vertical Integration- A corporation owns business units that make inputs for other business units
within the corporation (upstream and downstream).
To check Global scope (expand abroad or not), use the same better-off & ownership tests
Advantages of globalization-
o Factor Cost differences- locating overseas to exploit lower prices of inputs in other
countries
o Economies of Scale
o Knowledge Transfer: Japanese lean manufacturing concepts used by US firms
A major disadvantage of diversification is the costs involved, especially in coordination.
Advantages of Diversification-
o Economies of Scope- using a resource across multiple activities uses less of that
resource than when the activities are carried out independently. Resources can be
intangible (brands) or tangible (higher the fixed cost, greater the economies of scope)
o Organizational capabilities of parent firm (parenting advantage)
o Conglomerates/ firms as internal capital markets- allocation of budget across firms
o Internal labor market- transfer of staff between internal firms (eg: Tata)
Resources (capital doesn’t count)
o General- brand equity, management practices. Can be used in unrelated businesses also
o Specific- Farther away we go from the core business, the lesser useful they become
No empirical evidence that unrelated diversification will make a firm worse off
BCG Matrix: Market share 1.4 implies 40% higher share than next player & 1 implies same share
as next competitor. X implies the growth rate of economy.
o Issues with such matrices- Market share alone is pointless- doesn't say anything about
profitability. Matrices don’t capture inter-relationships & corporate wide competencies-
they are too simplistic.
1.0
AAA triangle- (firms need to prioritize between the 3A’s to define their strategy- which A or
which combinations give the most leverage)
o Adaptation- boost revenues and market share by maximizing a firm’s local relevance
o Aggregation- deliver economies of scale by creating regional or sometimes global
operations; standardize offering and group together the development and production
processes
o Arbitrage- exploitation of differences between national or regional markets, often by
locating separate parts of the supply chain in different regions
Importance of each A changes across the life cycle of a firm. The pursuit of AA strategies
requires considerable organizational and material innovation
Achieving AAA is kind of elusive for firms. Each A should be a good fit to overall business
strategy
o Some barriers are managerial limitations, cultural issues (focus on specific A’s mindset)
& competitor’s actions
o To even try AAA- a firm must be operating in an environment in which the tensions
among adaptation, aggregation, and arbitrage are weak or can be overridden by large
scale economies or structural advantages, or in which competitors are otherwise
constrained
GEMS has achieved AAA to a considerable degree-
o Aggregation- higher economies of scope, scale & acquisition capabilities
o Arbitrage- Pitcher-Catcher concept of having teams coordinate between old & new sites
till the new site achieves the performance metrics of older site
o Adaptation- country specific marketing, providing services, in China- for China idea
Knowledge mgmt. strategy should reflect competitive strategy- create value for customers,
support economic model & guide how people deliver on it
Do Not Straddle- 80-20 split: 80% of their knowledge sharing follows one strategy, 20% the
other. Executives who try to excel at both strategics risk failing at both.
Questions to answer while choosing knowledge management strategy-
o Do you offer standardized or customized products? (Customization- personalization
model helpful)
o Do you have a mature or innovative product? (If yes, reuse of data by codification
works)
o Do your people rely on explicit or tacit knowledge to solve problems? (explicit= codify)
Transforming Data to information to knowledge- increasing meaning & relevance such that
knowledge is a framework with value
Knowledge can be- Tacit or codifiable. Tacitness depends on Complexity, Non-quantifiability and
non-measurability & subtlety.
Knowledge Spiral- transformation from Tacit to Codified & vice-versa
o Codified to Tacit- internalization
o Tacit to codified- externalization
o Tacit to tacit- socialization
Tacitness-
o Contextual- Implied as everyone understands a fact
o Inaccessible (neither understandable, neither able to articulate) eg: Nadal’s tennis skills
o Accessible (understand but can’t articulate- mostly used by managers)
Learning cycle of an organization- (action on knowledge)
o Scanning (become aware)- Codifying (note down)- Abstracting (generalize)- Diffusing
(share with others)- Absorbing (application in new situations)
7S Model
An ideal organization is aligned/fits with its environment. Both internal & external alignment are
important.
The seven key elements of an organization that are critical in understanding an organization’s
effectiveness are: (a high degree of “fit,” or internal alignment, among these 7 is needed)
o Strategy- The ways in which competitive advantage will be achieved
o Structure- The way in which tasks and people are specialized and divided, and authority
is distributed. The mechanisms by which the activities of the members of the
organization are coordinated.
o Systems- The formal processes and procedures used to manage the organization
o Staffing- The organization’s approaches to recruitment, selection, and socialization. How
people are developed; how recruits are trained, socialized, and integrated; and how
their careers are managed
o Skills- The distinctive competencies that reside in the organization
o Style- The leadership style of top management and the overall operating style of the
organization. Style impacts the norms people follow and how they work and interact
with each other and with customers
o Shared value- The core or fundamental set of values that are widely shared in the
organization and serve as a guiding principle
These 7S’s are inter-linked, can’t be viewed in isolation. Tailoring one requires modifying others
accordingly
Strategy, structure, and systems are the “hard S’s which are easier to change than their
counterparts I.e., the “softer S’s” – staffing, skills, style and shared values. These are harder to
change directly, and it takes longer to do so.
Schein’s framework