Project Base
Project Base
APA Citation: Suryani, L., & Argawati, N. O. (2023). Teaching speaking through project-based learning with
ICT. Indonesian EFL Journal, 9(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v9i1.7134.
35
Lilis Suryani & Ningtyas Orilina Argawati
Teaching speaking through project-based learning with ICT
fundamental question integrated with topics that Besides, the speakers are unable to actively
will make students fells curious. Second, designing participate in verbal conversation due to individual
a plan for the project: students and teachers circumstances and cultural barriers (Abrar, 2019).
develop a plan by actively sharing ideas. Third, It is confirmed by some previous studies that
creating a schedule: Both teachers and students demonstrate that learning to talk might be
create a schedule to decide the time allocation for challenging (Ratnasari, 2020; Geria, 2022;
working on the project and the deadline to submit Oktavia, 2022).
the project. Fourth, monitoring: the teacher The suitable choice of the best language
observes the progression, guides the students learning techniques will assist the students in
during the project development, facilitates the developing their speaking abilities both inside and
learning process, and ensures every student is outside of the ESL classroom, where the language
involved. Fifth, assessing the outcome: teacher will applies to real-world situations (Zakaria et al.,
determine the product made by students by giving 2019). Speaking can be taught in a variety of
feedback. Last, evaluating the experience: teacher strategies, either individually or in groups. One
and students reflect on the project they have done learning strategy that works well is project-based
by sharing their knowledge of conducting the learning. Project-based learning can improve
project to get perfection in the next project. students’ performance, including speaking
The researchers used ICT and project-based (Winasih et al., 2019). With this strategy, students
learning in this study. To address the needs of can develop real things individually or in groups.
students in Industry 4.0, ICT is integrated into Project-based learning is an innovative approach,
Project-based learning. The majority of students and it allows students to think critically and
use their devices regularly and are comfortable creatively by building initiatives to produce real
with technology. Additionally, teachers products in the form of goods or services (Ukah et
incorporate various applications into their lessons al., 2023).
to achieve the learning objective. ICT is expected Almulla (2020) says that the findings
to help the learning process effectively, which is in demonstrate that the project-based learning
line with previous research that ICT can support technique enhances student involvement by
teaching to improve the effectiveness of the facilitating knowledge, information sharing, and
learning process (Suryani et al.,2019). Therefore, discussion. On the other hand, project-based
it is hoped that project-based learning and ICT can learning triggers the students' participation but also
solve the learning gap. collaborates the students to work in a group. In the
Many learning gaps can cause learning issues. end, the students can achieve the purpose of
Speaking is one of the issues, and it is an essential learning. The PBL technique is also strongly
skill that belongs to the category of productive advised for usage in the classroom by students and
skills. To communicate effectively, you must have should be promoted at universities.
this ability. To improve communication among Regarding the explanation above, this research
target language learners, speaking ability must be would like to implement project-based learning
developed equally as much as other skills (Aziz & with ICT in teaching speaking and knowing the
Kashinathan, 2021). The learners are expected to students' responses. In this research, some
master speaking because it is an essential language applications for creating video projects were used
ability for foreign language learners to master. This to design the research project.
is in line with Sabina (2018), Rao (2019), and Rani
(2020); speaking is the most important of the four METHOD
language skills to communicate effectively. Sadly, In this study, which aims to understand how
the students still require assistance with their project-based learning using ICT is implemented in
speaking. Acquiring a language is not always speaking, classroom action research was chosen as
simple (Riadil as cited in Khatoony and Rahmany, an appropriate method. It also serves as a tool for
2020). understanding how students feel about PBL with
Speaking becomes a problem since it is ICT.
undoubtedly tricky for non-native speakers and is Students' difficulties with speaking are
frequently attributed to various factors. Speaking addressed through classroom action research,
English is challenging since speakers need to be which also reveals how PBL and ICT have
knowledgeable in a wide range of skills, such as improved students' speaking abilities. Teachers
pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, fluency, and conduct classroom action research to enhance
comprehension (Aziz & Kashinathan, 2021). teaching and learning, identify issues, and develop
36
Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ) p-ISSN 2252-7427, e-ISSN 2541-3635
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2023 https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IEFLJ/index
37
Lilis Suryani & Ningtyas Orilina Argawati
Teaching speaking through project-based learning with ICT
step is monitoring; the lecturer tried to see the schedule was the next step; the students would
students' progress and asked them about the make a video based on the agenda. While the
project's challenges. At the last meeting, the students were doing the project, the lecturer
students finished their job and uploaded their monitored the project.
projects to the YouTube channel class. Assessing Finishing the project and uploading the project
is done by the lecturer. After uploading, they is the following step. After editing, the students had
watched together and gave comments about the to upload it. The students were easier to finish the
video. Here is the detailed data from cycle 1: second video, and they also uploaded it to their
class YouTube channel. The students knew better
Table 1. Cycle 1 how to do the second project.
Meeting 1 ● Explaining project-based
learning steps Table 2. Cycle 2
● Giving essential questions Meeting ● Giving essential questions about the
● Introducing about interesting 1 favorite place and its unique culture
facts about me ● Discussing the topic
Meeting 2 ● Showing some videos related to Meeting ● Providing some videos related to
exciting facts about me 2 the topic
● Drilling some vocabulary and ● Drilling some vocabularies
answering worksheets ● Talking about their hometown
● Identifying their personality ● Designing a project
● Designing a plan and creating a ● Creating the schedule
schedule Meeting ● Sharing about their hometown
Meeting 3 ● Sharing their personality 3 ● Monitoring
● Explaining some applications Meeting ● Finishing video
that can be used in creating 4 ● Uploading video
video ● Assessing
● Monitoring ● Evaluating
Meeting 4 ● Finishing video After conducting two cycles, here is the
● Uploading video following result of students' speaking scores based
● Assessing the project
● Evaluating
on five criteria of the speaking rubric from cycle 1
to cycle 2:
Second cycle
The lecturer introduced another topic in the second
cycle: my favorite place(s) and its unique culture. Speaking score
She also discussed four related issues:
conversation, verbal and non-verbal 80
communication, display of emotion and affection,
dress, punctuality, and formality, and asked the 75
students about their hometowns and tried Mean Score
70
comparing them and the topic. This is called the
first step of PjBL, giving essential questions. 65
Next meeting, the lecturer showed some videos cycle 1 cycle 2
related to the topic. The students were asked to give
comments about the video that they watched. After Figure 1. The mean score of cycles 1 and 2
that, the students worked in a group and were asked The figure shows that cycle one's mean score
to make a concept about their video. They shared was 72, and cycle two's was 79. According to the
and revised each other. They talked about their mean score, there was an improvement in the
hometown and its culture. students' speaking. It was reported that the
Designing the project was the next step; they students' speaking scores were good when project-
discussed and identified the topic. They talked and based learning was implemented. The students'
planned, then created the video; every student in lowest speaking exam score in the first cycle was
their group had to participate in the project. The fluency, according to the results. It was due to
students decided on the application that could be particular students' pauses and continued usage of
used to make a video. Here is the second cycle, so their first language. Drilling deeper in cycle two
the students were more familiar with the video may be the answer. The fluency aspect's overall
application they would use. Then, creating a score rose in the second cycle, while grammar
38
Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ) p-ISSN 2252-7427, e-ISSN 2541-3635
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2023 https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IEFLJ/index
received the lowest mark. It was clear that the Argawati & Suryani (2020) that the students are
students provided inappropriate phrases or actively involved in learning. The students are
sentences in their responses. Based on the scoring actively engaged in their group, and they can share.
rubric criteria, the students showed good progress It can be seen that the students speak more in
from cycle 1 to cycle two. So, Project-based English with their friends; they can support one
learning can improve students' speaking skills, another. The result of the interview proves it.
which is supported by a previous study (Riswandi,
2018; Sirisrimangkorn, 2018; Mafruudloh & Student 4 : “It is easier to speak in English
Fitriati, 2020). with friends in a group, and we
can help each other.
Student 6 : “I am involved in a learning
Students' responses in learning to speak using
project with my friends.
project-based learning with ICT
According to the student's responses, project-
The fourth is new knowledge. The students
based learning with ICT for teaching speaking has
learned some applications related to creating
both positive and negative aspects. The following
videos and uploaded the video to a YouTube
is the result.
channel. By facilitating knowledge and
The first is collaboration, which aligns with
information sharing and discussion, the findings
Astuti et al.’s research (2021) that the students can
demonstrate how the PjBL technique enhances
work with their friends. The students gained a
student involvement (Almulla, 2020). In addition,
variety of abilities, including group teamwork and
the result of the interview showed the same result
negotiating. The majority of the students could
as the observation result.
share and collaborate well, as seen by the
observation in the classroom. For example, when Student 5: “I know more about some
the students were uncertain of the video's story, applications to make the video.”
they could negotiate with their friends to determine Student 9: “It is interesting to do this project
the story. Additionally, the result of the interview using ICT, it is interesting.”
supports it.
In addition, the project has two weaknesses: the
Interviewer : “What are the advantages of first is the time limit, and the second is the
project-based learning?” storyline. The first is that the video editing process
Student 7 : “I can share and do a collaborationtook longer than expected, so limited time can be
with my friends in a group.
challenging in implementing PjBL. It is supported
Then, making and taking videos
to finish the project with my (Sirisrimangkorn, 2021) that time constraints
friends were posed a significant challenge in the study. The
exciting
experiences” issue might be resolved by assigning tasks to each
Student 3 : “I can work with friends, and itgroup member. The second is a story told at the
is easier.” beginning; because everyone had various ideas, it
took some explaining to figure out the story of the
The second is motivation. PBL considerably video. Negotiating among them could be able to
and favorably increased the accomplishment find a solution.
motivation (Sari, 2018). The students enjoyed
discussing and doing the project (Abubakar, 2015). CONCLUSION
They also got more confidence in speaking Project-based learning with ICT could enhance
(Pratiwi, 2016). When the students worked on a students' speaking skills through involvement in
project in their group, they were motivated to the project. The scores of the students significantly
discuss it. The observation reveals that the majority increased between the first and second cycles. The
of students completed them with enthusiasm. This students responded well, especially after they
is in line with the result of the interview. posted their project and allowed their friends to
watch it. They might actively collaborate and
Student 1 : “I am interested in doing the support one another in completing their tasks. PBL
project with my friends” may motivate kids to speak up and assist them in
Student 5 : "it is more fun.” learning to talk effectively and energetically
The third is that the students are more active. It REFERENCES
is supported by Mafruudloh & Fitriati (2020) and Abrar, M. (2019). Re-telling: A Narrative inquiry of
39
Lilis Suryani & Ningtyas Orilina Argawati
Teaching speaking through project-based learning with ICT
Indonesian graduate students' speaking Mafruudloh, N., & Fitriati, R. (2020). The effect of
experiences in a United Kingdom university. project-based learning on the student's speaking
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, ability. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English
8(30), 588-596. Langauge Teaching, Literature and Linguistics,
Aguskin, L., & Maryani. (2020). Investigating the use 7(1), 57-64.
of project-based learning in enhancing Meesuk,P., Sramoon, B. & Wongrugsa, A.(2020).
Indonesian university students' cultural Classroom action research-based instruction: the
knowledge. Humaniora, 11(3), 203-210. sustainable teacher professional development
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v11i3.6645 strategy. Journal of Teacher Education for
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project- Sustainability,22(1)98-110.
based learning (PBL) approach as a way to Mertler, C. A. (2021). Action research as teacher
engage students in learning. Sage Open, 10(3), inquiry: A viable strategy for resolving problems
2158244020938702 of practice. Practical Assessment, Research, and
Argawati, N. O., & Suryani, L. (2020). Project-based Evaluation: Vol. 26 , Article 19.
learning in teaching writing: The implementation Oktavia, F. (2022). The students' problems in learning
and students' opinion. English Review: Journal English speaking at SMAN 1 Grati Pasuruan.
of English Education, 8(2), 219-226. Enreal: English Research and Literacy Journal,
Aminullah, A., Loeneto, B. A., & Vianty, M. (2019). 2(2), 212-228.
Teachers' attitudes and problems of using ICT in Ratnasari, A. G. (2020). EFL Students' challenges in
teaching EFL. English Review: Journal of learning speaking skills: A case study in
English Education, 8(1), 147-156. mechanical engineering. Journal of Foreign
Argawati, N. O., & Suryani, L. (2020). Project-based Language teaching and learning, 5(1).
learning in teaching writing: The implementation Riswandi, D. (2018). The implementation of project-
and students' opinion. English Review: Journal based learning to improve students' speaking
of English Education, 8(2), 219-226. skills. International Journal of Language
Astuti, D., Syukri, S., Nurfaidah, S., & Atikah, D. Teaching and Education, 2 (1), 32 -40.
(2021). EFL students' perceptions of the benefits Rao, P. S. (2019). The importance of speaking skills in
of project-based learning in translation class. English classrooms. Alford Council of
International Journal of Transdisciplinary International English & Literature Journal
Knowledge, 2(1), 12–26. (ACIELJ), 2(2), 6-18.
Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL learners' Rani, S. (2020). Factor analysis: The issues and
challenges in speaking English in Malaysian challenges in English speaking skill of
classroom. Development, 10(2), 983-991. Bangladeshi EFL learners at tertiary level.
Geria, A. A. J. A. (2022). Challenges faced students in Journal of Critical Reviews, 7, 6983-6993.
speaking English in Indonesia: A literature Sabina, Z. (2018). The importance of teaching listening
study. Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Indonesia, and speaking skills. World Science, 7(34), 52-55.
2(2), 123-126. Sari, I. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning and
Helmanda, C. M., & Nisa, R. (2019). The analysis of project-based learning on the achievement
students' oral performances by using a speaking motivation. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 6 (2), 129-
scoring rubric. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 3(2), 135.
76-86. Sathappan, R., & Gurusamy, P. (2021). The benefits of
Ilham. (2022). Implementing project-based learning for project-based language learning: A case study in
EFL students' writing achievement at the tertiary a Malaysian secondary school. Journal of Social
level. English Review: Journal of English Science Research, 17, 1–9.
Education, 10(3), 1003-1012. Sirisrimangkorn, L. (2018). The use of project-based
http://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i3.6470. learning focusing on drama to promote the
Khatoony, H., & Rahmani, L. (2020). Difficulties and speaking skills of EFL learners. Advances in
weaknesses of speaking skill among Iranian EFL Langauge and Literary Studies, 9(6), 14-20.
learners: a review article of speaking obstacles in Sirisrimangkorn, L. (2021). Improving EFL
applied linguistic students. International Journal undergraduate learners' speaking skills through
of Language, Literature, Culture and History project-based learning using presentation.
Studies, 2(2), 59-69. Advances in Language and Literary Studies,
Kingston, S. (2018). Project based learning & student 12(3), 65-72.
achievement: What does the research tell us? Suryani, L., Syahrizal, T., & El Fauziah, U. N. (2019).
PBL Evidence Matters. 1(1), 1-11. Using ORAI application in teaching
http://bie.org/x9JN pronunciation. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(2),
Lufungulo, E., Mambwe, R., & Kalinde, B. (2021). The 93-102.
meaning and role of action research in education. Ukah, Y., Ayewu, C., & Oworu, P. (2023). Improving
Multidisciplinary Journal of Language and students' language learning through project-
Social Science Education, 4(2), 115-128. based learning activities. JELITA, 9-23.
40
Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ) p-ISSN 2252-7427, e-ISSN 2541-3635
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2023 https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IEFLJ/index
Wiranda, R., Petrus, I., & Vianty, M. (2020). The use of ability across personality types. Arab World
ICT in learning process by vocational teachers of English Journal, 10 (1) 73- 83.
English. English Review: Journal of English Zahra, W., Inderawati, R., & Petrus, I. (2019). The use
Education, 8(2), 283-290. of ICT in authentic assessment of the students'
Wulandari, A. dan Ahmad, A. (2020). The effect of productive skills. English Review: Journal of
using project-based learning method on students' English Education, 8(1), 81-90. doi:
writing skill. Journal of English Language and 10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2110
Education, 5(1), 1-15. Zakaria, N., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). A
Winasih, W. W., Cahyono, B.Y., & Prayogo, J. A. review of affective strategy and social strategy in
(2019). Effect of project-based learning using e- developing students' speaking skills. Creative
poster on Indonesian EFL students’ speaking Education, 10(12), 3082-3090.
41
Lilis Suryani & Ningtyas Orilina Argawati
Teaching speaking through project-based learning with ICT
42