Delegate’s Handbook

2024
 LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY GENERAL
Dear delegates and Faculty Advisors,

It is with great pleasure and excitement, that I warmly welcome everyone to the second edition
of the Antonio Raimondi Model United Nations. I am Sofia Vargas, I’m in 4th Liceo Linguistico
and the Head Delegate of the Raimondi Team and now Secretary General of RAIMUN 2024. I
am truly grateful for this position and for being able to host such a large-scale conference, our
dedicated Secretariat and our talented team of staff and faculty have worked tirelessly to
bring you the best conference possible.

Growing up in a household with both lawyer parents, our family conversations naturally
evolved into lively debates, particularly during dinners when we gathered to discuss current
political events. These moments, filled with spirited dialogue, remain the fondest and most
cherished memories of my family life. It wasn't until 2019 that I had the opportunity to apply
the skills honed during these conversations.

At the age of 12, I found myself enrolled in my first Model United Nations (MUN) experience.
Despite my initial lack of familiarity with the intricacies of the MUN format, my enthusiasm and
research helped me not only navigate the conference successfully but also garner an award.
Yet, beyond the accolades, what truly resonated was my growing ambition to further immerse
myself in MUN, taking every opportunity available to better my skills.

As Secretary-General, I aspire to provide each participant, regardless of their level of MUN

experience, with an enriching and transformative experience. My own journey in MUN has
significantly shaped my character, and I take pride in discovering a space where my
extroverted, witty, and dedicated personality aligns seamlessly with MUN and being able to be
surrounded by fellow future leaders and bright minds.

I extend a warm invitation for each delegate to set a personal goal before the conference
starts, whether it be forging new friendships, refining negotiation and speaking skills, or simply
enjoying the experience. Embrace the challenge and encourage both yourself and fellow
delegates to overcome any obstacles that may arise during committee sessions. We have
diligently worked to ensure transparency and fairness in every aspect of the conference.
Should you have any inquiries or concerns, do not hesitate to reach out to me through the
channels provided in this Handbook.

Kind Regards,
Sofía Vargas Solari
Secretary General
LETTER FROM THE CO-SECRETARY GENERAL

Dear delegates,

I am more than excited to welcome you to the second edition of Raimondi Model United
Nations. I am looking forward to seeing how each and every one of you tackles these intricate
global challenges. I have endeavored to choose topics based on the importance and relevance
of contemporary concerns, and I hope you will enjoy learning and discussing these issues.

Model United Nations has allowed me to find my voice, learn to work with others, and
articulate my views. By attending Model UN conferences, I have been able to discover my
strengths in communication and research, and I hope that everyone can get at least some
benefit from this conference.

At present, I am immersed in the exciting final stage of my secondary education, being a

student of the 4th Liceo, the last year of the Italian baccalaureate. This period marks not only
the culmination of my academic achievements but also the beginning of a fascinating
transition to new horizons.

In organizing this conference, our purpose was to create a safe environment where every
participant could learn. So, whether you have big ambitions and are chasing an award, don't
forget to enjoy the process! Make friendships and live every moment of this conference,
which although short, offers valuable opportunities. I am sure that in the end, what you will
remember is not only the prize you won, but the laughs shared, the connections made, and the
special moments. Winning is rewarding, but experiencing personal growth during and after
the conference is even more meaningful, and this applies not only to Model UN but to life in
general.

And now I invite you to continue your research and read the rest of the material we have
prepared for you. Thank you for taking the time to read this, and even if you skipped the letter,
I hope you have an incredible conference experience!

Best Regards,
Diego Mejia
Co-Secretary General
 the structure of raimun
RaiMUN is a three-day international relations simulation for high school students held
annually in the city of Lima, Peru. After our first edition in 2018, we are back with a new
edition.

At RaiMUN, delegates experience first-hand the challenges of negotiation, taking on the role
of representatives of the United Nations and members of other decision-making bodies.

In this second edition, there will be 13 committees.

3 General Assembly committees, 6 regional bodies and ECOSOCS, and 3 specialized
agencies, as well as a press corps. Each school attending the conference has been assigned
multiple countries, and each country is represented by one or two delegates on each
committee.

Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC): The uses of Lethal

Autonomous Weapons and Artificial Intelligence in Warfare
The DISEC committee addresses the multifaceted challenges arising from lethal autonomous
weapons and artificial intelligence in warfare. Striving for global security, it deliberates on
regulations and frameworks to navigate the ethical, legal, and strategic implications of these
advanced technologies, ensuring responsible and accountable use.

Social, Cultural, and Humanitarian Committee (SOCHUM): The situation in Western

Sahara
The SOCHUM Committee addresses global challenges related to human rights, cultural
preservation, and social issues. In the context of Western Sahara, SOCHUM examines
humanitarian concerns, indigenous rights, and socio-cultural aspects to foster international
cooperation and seek resolutions for the region's complex situation.

United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC): Promotion and Protection of Human
Rights in Central America
The UNHRC focuses on advancing and safeguarding human rights in Central America,
addressing regional challenges through diplomatic dialogue and cooperation. It strives to
mitigate issues such as social inequality, violence, and discrimination, working towards a
more just and inclusive society in the Central American region.

World Health Organization (WHO): Prevention of narcotic drug use in adolescents

The World Health Organization (WHO) actively addresses the prevention of narcotic drug use
in adolescents by implementing evidence-based strategies. Through comprehensive
initiatives, the committee focuses on education, community engagement, and policy
advocacy to safeguard the well-being of adolescents, promoting a drug-free environment
and fostering long-term public health outcomes.
 Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA): Protección cultural y religiosa de Pueblos
Indígenas
La Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA) se dedica a la protección de la cultura y
religión de los Pueblos Indígenas en el continente americano. Desarrolla políticas y programas
que respetan y preservan las prácticas culturales y religiosas, promoviendo la diversidad y el
respeto a los derechos de los pueblos originarios.

Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL): The US-china trade war
The SPECPOL Committee addresses the complex issue of the US-China trade war, aiming to
foster international cooperation and resolution. Through diplomatic dialogues and policy
recommendations, SPECPOL seeks to mitigate tensions, promote fair trade practices, and
facilitate a peaceful resolution that benefits global economic stability and cooperation.

United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN WOMEN):
Preventing Child Marriage and Female Genital Mutilation
UN Women plays a crucial role in preventing child marriage and female genital mutilation
(FGM) worldwide. The organization employs a multifaceted approach, advocating for legal
reforms, community awareness, and empowerment programs. By collaborating with
governments and grassroots organizations, UN Women strives to eradicate these harmful
practices, promoting gender equality, and safeguarding the rights and well-being of girls and
women globally.

United Nations Security Council (UNSC): Combating the black market in arms and
terrorist groups
The UNSC is actively engaged in combating the black market in arms and terrorist groups.
Through stringent resolutions, intelligence-sharing, and international cooperation, the UNSC
seeks to disrupt illicit arms trade networks and dismantle support systems for terrorist
organizations. By addressing the root causes and enforcing sanctions, the council aims to
enhance global security and stability.

Unión Europea (UE): Gestión de los flujos migratorios y el Derecho al asilo

La Unión Europea (UE) gestiona los flujos migratorios y el derecho de asilo mediante políticas
integradas. Mediante la cooperación entre los Estados miembros, la UE promueve una gestión
humanitaria y sostenible de la migración, respetando el derecho de asilo. Se centra en políticas
comunes, seguridad fronteriza y solidaridad, buscando soluciones integradoras y respetuosas
con los derechos humanos.
 Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la infancia (UNICEF): Previniendo la Apatridia y el
tráfico de menores
El Comité de UNICEF, dedicado a la prevención de la apatridia y la trata de menores, se enfoca
en abordar dos problemáticas fundamentales: la apatridia, que afecta a millones de personas
en todo el mundo al negarles una nacionalidad y los derechos que esta conlleva, y la trata de
menores, que explota a niños y niñas vulnerables de diversas maneras. Este comité trabaja
para desarrollar políticas, programas y campañas destinadas a proteger los derechos de los
niños y combatir estas formas extremas de vulnerabilidad. Su labor es esencial para promover
la justicia y garantizar un futuro más seguro y digno para todos los niños.

CONGRESO: Golpe de Estado de Pedro Castillo (2022)

El 7 de diciembre de 2022, el presidente Pedro Castillo intentó dar un golpe de Estado al
disolver el Congreso de la República, intervenir al Poder Judicial y al Ministerio Público, y
convocar a elecciones para un nuevo Congreso con facultades constituyentes.

Historical Crisis: Fall of the fascist regime in Italy

The fall of the fascist regime in Italy (1943-1945) marked the end of Benito Mussolini's rule. The
Fascist Grand Council, fearing defeat in World War II, turned against Mussolini, leading to his
arrest. The Italian Committee of National Liberation emerged, aiding the Allies, and Italy
transitioned to a democratic republic in 1946.

PRESS CORPS
Relentless journalists, agile reporters, inquiring minds, weaving stories through updates and
capturing the essence of truth amidst the chaotic dance of events with the bias of the media.
 How to prepare for RaiMUN
Functional Research:
Introduction:
There are three equally important aspects of delegate preparation: functional, substantive,
and positional preparation. Functional preparation equips the delegates with basic tools,
including an understanding of the rules, necessary to perform in committee. The substantive
element provides a groundwork of specific information on the topic areas. Finally, positional
preparation requires the students to adopt perspectives that are not their own. With this in
mind, the RaiMUN Secretariat provides three tools to aid you:
This Guide to Delegate Preparation, Background Guides, and the Rules of Procedure.
Together, these will ensure you will be ready for the conference. Beyond reading and
understanding the material we have provided, the more practical experience you can acquire
through debate, resolution-writing, making presentations, and the like, the better
prepared you will be.

Substantive Preparation:
The Study Guides are the result of thorough research and commitment by the directors and
assistant directors, forming the essential basis for substantive preparation in each
committee. We advise a comprehensive review of these guides, identification of challenging
areas, additional research, and, in case of any inquiries, contacting your directors through
email. They will be delighted to help with any uncertainties you may have. A delegate who
has not assimilated all the information in the Study Guide may face difficulties in effectively
participating in the committee. Although the Study Guide provides general information about
committees and topics, delegates are expected to further research the issues and their
countries' policies.

Positional Preparation:
Delegates are required to embrace and represent the stance and policies of the specific
country, character, or media outlet assigned to them in this Model UN. This encompasses,
among other things, adopting the biases and viewpoints associated with their assigned role.
This obligation compels delegates to thoroughly analyze the perspectives, challenges, and
policies of fellow delegates' countries.

Differences between a General Assembly Committee and a Crisis Committee:

Crisis Committees diverge from the standard General Assembly Committees in several
aspects, despite sharing certain discussion protocols. Notably, their rules exhibit a higher
degree of flexibility. A primary distinction lies in the fact that, while in a Crisis Committee,
delegates represent a character rather than a country.
Furthermore, extensive research is required on the assigned character's portfolio of powers
and responsibilities within the committee. Another significant deviation involves the types of
documents presented during the session, a topic that will be further explored in the
subsequent discussion on the presentation of directives and secret actions.

The ultimate disparity lies in the support provided to all crisis committees through a Crisis
Room, overseen by the Crisis Director. The crisis room is responsible for coordinating and
delivering to the committee all crisis elements, referred to as updates, while also reviewing
documents prepared by the delegates. It is crucial to note that, unlike a standard General
Assembly Committee, delegates in a Crisis Committee confront a continual stream of issues
that evolve based on the committee's responses.

Where to Start Your Research:

The Study Guides and any materials prepared by the Raimondi Model United Nations
directors or staff are not intended to replace your research. Specific sources to investigate
include:

Yearbook of the United Nations: The Yearbook is a good starting point for your research. The
Yearbook will provide you with general information on what has been done on your topic
during any particular year. It also provides very helpful references to previous articles and
resolutions.
https://www.un.org/en/yearbook

United Nations Chronicle: This magazine gives you general information on the proceedings
of the UN. Keep an eye out for special reports on your topic area, which will inform you about
the topic and nations’ positions on it.
https://www.un.org/en/chronicle

UN Document Index: This index for all UN documents comes in three different versions: UNDI
(1950-1973), UNDEX (1970-1978), and UNDOC (1979-present). Depending on which of the three
you are using, you will find a subject index, a country index, and an alphanumeric list of all
documents published (this is useful because each committee has its unique alphanumeric
prefix, and thus you can find all the documents put out by a committee during a certain year
regardless of the specific topic).

UN Resolutions: This series is both valuable and very easy to use. The index is cumulative
from 1946, which means that you need only check the most current index to find all the
resolutions on your topic that the UN has ever passed. The resolution voting records (located
in the front of the book) will indicate where your country and others stand on the issues.
 Position Papers
Once you have completed your preliminary research, you are ready to write your position
paper. RaiMUN requires delegates to write a one page (excluding bibliography) position paper.
Your Director’s email address can be found either in your Background Guide or the RaiMUN
website.

Each position paper has three basic parts: your country’s national interests, your country’s
national policies, and your opinion on potential resolution components. National interests are
what a country would like to see happen in the world (e.g. Cameroon, a lesser-developed
country troubled by terrorism, wants to reduce the incidence of terrorism to stabilize its
government). These interests are not subject to compromise, but instead generally idealized
goals or methods of solving specific problems.

National policies are the country’s attempts to secure its interests (e.g. Cameroon, to combat
terrorism, has sought to enter into new extradition treaties). These policy positions are
usually open to negotiation. Your opinions on potential resolution components are your
responses to the “Questions A Resolution Must Answer” section of the Background Guide.
Although these sections provide flexibility, you need to keep in mind the interests of your
nation. Possible resolutions must be consistent with your country’s national interests and
current national policies (e.g. Cameroon feels that any resolution on the prevention of
terrorism must assign to the injured state the right to try the terrorists. In addition, Cameroon
would not be averse to the establishment of an international information network on
terrorism. Cameroon, however, will not support any resolution that allows terrorist acts to be
protected from extradition under the political offense exception doctrine).

Writing position papers benefits you in many ways. The staff reads over the position papers
and summarizes them to gauge what the committee will be like and to see which delegates
have done a good job preparing for the conference.

Most importantly, writing a position paper makes you think about the information you have
researched and helps you to express ideas concisely and clearly, making you better prepared
for the conference.

The structuring of the position papers is intended to elicit responses from the delegates that
provide a clear picture of a nation’s stance on a particular topic area. By providing an outline
of a position paper, we hope that delegates will be able to illustrate knowledge of their
country’s policies and interests instead of simply reiterating parts of the Background Guide.
A position paper should include three sections:

Background of the Topic

• In your country’s opinion, what are the main elements of the problem?
• What are the roots of those elements?

Position taken by your delegation

• What are your national interests in the situation?
• What are your nation’s policies on the topic?
• What steps would you like to see taken to deal with the problem?

Proposed Solutions
• What does your nation believe needs to be done to solve the problem?
• What do you predict will be the main opposition to your proposals?

Position papers should roughly adhere to the above form, with the Country, the Committee,
the Topic, and the school name included at the top. Please limit your paper to one page
(excluding bibliography)

Plagiarism Policy
While discourse benefits from an open exchange of ideas, delegates must transparently
acknowledge reliance on others' work. All submissions to the committee must be original,
with proper citation for any external content. Delegates are urged to consult advisors if
uncertain, ensuring a clear distinction between personal ideas and sourced information.
Plagiarism, encompassing various forms, is strictly cautioned against. Consultation with
faculty advisors, Directors, or Co-Secretary-Generals is encouraged before submission to
mitigate risks.

Plagiarism can take many forms, including:

Direct copying: Employing language from an external source or fellow delegate without
appropriate citation.

Inadequate paraphrasing: Modifying concepts from an external source or fellow delegate

without giving credit to the original origin.

Content duplication: Presenting written materials that have been previously utilized in
academic or extracurricular contexts, or a different Model UN committee.

Delegates under suspicion of plagiarism will undergo an inquiry reported to faculty

advisors, potentially leading to disciplinary measures such as reduced consideration, and
award ineligibility. Our advanced plagiarism detection system (Turnitin) will scrutinize all
materials submitted to the dais. Any concerns about policy violations should be promptly
reported to the Committee Director. Failure to report known instances of plagiarism may
incur consequences equivalent to direct involvement in plagiarism.
 A note on Single Delegations vs Double Delegations committees
In Raimondi's Model United Nations, we offer committees made up of single or double
delegations. It is imperative that students on a dual delegation effectively share duties and
responsibilities both before and during the conference. Students participating in dual
delegation committees should not split preparation and knowledge of subject areas.

In addition, both members of the delegation must participate in debate, caucus, and
resolution writing at the conference.

We discourage students from merely being "speakers" or "caucusers" and encourage an

effective balance between the two roles, in part because it allows us to better assess the
performance of both delegates, but also because we believe it is important that
that delegates practice the skills necessary to be successful in both block formation outside
the room and communication in the committee room.

The premise of a dual delegation committee is not to split the work in half, but to offer
different approaches to diplomacy. Dual delegations bring an additional element of teamwork
necessary for success in drafting resolutions: the ability to cooperate with one's own
country's representatives and advocate a position in line with one's national policy. It is only
when both members of the delegation collaborate effectively and participate in all aspects of
the committee that they make the most of their dual delegation experience.

A note on Press Corps (TPA) Committees

This committee is usually made up of different media so that decisions can be made
according to the editorial line of our media. Despite these differences, there are certain
requirements that each delegate must follow.

The main task of a delegate in this committee is to make "pieces", which should contain
information that will aim to supply readers that may be delegates and thus, country
representatives, staff of the UN, in this case, the dais, and daily readers (those outside the
conference). These pieces can vary depending on the press corporation and what type of
content they produce. Pieces normally seen are updates, articles, videos, photographs,
editorials, interviews, podcasts, infographics, political cartoons, and social media, among
many others. You can find more information about the committee's expectations in your
study guide and should you have any additional questions please do not hesitate to contact
your chairs by email.
 A note on Crisis Committees
Like regular General Committees, Crisis Committees follow all the rules of procedure
regarding debate and speeches, which means that delegates can still make motions in
moderate and non-moderate caucuses. However, delegates may use an additional motion,
called a Round Robin, which allows all delegates to speak for a specified time (determined by
the delegate making the motion), in counterclockwise order. The rules regarding the voting
procedure remain the same as in a regular General Assembly Committee. However, motions
to divide Questions and Voting Time are more frequent and more useful in a crisis committee
than in a regular general committee.

Delegates to a Crisis Committe are not required to submit working papers or draft
resolutions. Instead, they must submit documents specific to Crisis Committees. These
documents are:

Directives:
Although many say that a directive is like a clause in a draft resolution, we prefer to define it
as a concise and clear document in which delegates outline a detailed plan to address the
crisis through an "update." Therefore, it is not like a draft resolution, because directives do not
need to follow a format to be accepted. The only requirement is that they meet the number of
signatures determined by the Directors.

When crafting a directive, it is highly recommended to address key questions: What is the
intended action? How will it be executed? When is the proposed timeline? Who will be
impacted? What is the source of funding? Directives, while not mandated to be brief, should
be detailed and specific. Clear and concise language is essential to articulate each step of the
proposed idea. The approval process mirrors that of a draft resolution. After submission and
approval, the delegate presents the directive for debate. Once the debate concludes, the
delegate must motion to close it before the committee proceeds to the voting phase to
determine approval.

Secret Actions:
As the name implies, a Secret Action is an individual action that a delegate may take,
depending on his or her character, during the Committee, either to help himself or herself or
to endanger the Committee. A Secret Action may be written on a simple piece of paper and
should be given to the Crisis Director for review. The Crisis Director will read it and respond to
you, telling you whether or not the action you have taken has occurred. Although it is not
formatted, we strongly recommend that you write it as if it were a letter addressed to
someone your character knows and would be willing to help (e.g., your secretary or a family
member). We also encourage you to answer the following questions as you write it:
 What do you intend to do?
How will he/she do it?
When will you do it?
Who will it affect?
How do you plan to fund it?

Is that action something your character can and would do? Why? Remember that good Secret
Actions will always go toward solving the Committee's problems, so we encourage you to
follow these tips:

Make sure the Secret Action is relevant and related to the situation going on in your committee.
Remember it should be detailed enough to avoid updates that could negatively affect your character
or the Committee. Please think before you write it.

Make sure your Secret Action is proportional to your character's portfolio of powers (e.g., a Minister of
the Environment cannot use the Intelligence Service to hack into a computer). In other words, make
sure your character can do what you intend.

Documents that must be submitted to General Assembly Committees

Working Paper:
Working papers are the initial stride towards achieving a resolution, arising from collaborative
efforts and discussions among delegates. Functioning as tangible documents, these papers
embody the essence of their name by providing a foundation for delegates to build upon.
They represent the inaugural endeavor to transform abstract concepts from debates and
position papers into written expressions. While maintaining a certain formality, working
papers retain a degree of flexibility, unencumbered by the structure dictated by resolutions.
Essentially, these papers act as preliminary versions, honing in on specific facets of the
overall topic and guiding discussions.

Working papers play a pivotal role in shaping consensus within the committee. This phase is
crucial for constructive deliberations, as addressing challenges at this juncture significantly
streamlines the resolution process. The director holds authority over the working paper
process, necessitating approval before it can be presented.

It's important to note that working papers lack a rigid format. Working papers are presented
in flexible formats, with the draft approach being common. Drafts provide a malleable
foundation for collaborative modifications, evolving into refined resolutions. This format
enables easy editing, fostering collective input for a cohesive resolution. Additionally, working
papers may use visual tools like Canva or PowerPoint for engaging presentations. These
multimedia formats enhance idea communication, captivate audiences, and promote
interactive discussions, offering a visual dimension for conveying complex concepts among
delegates.
 Draft Resolutions:
The draft resolution is the committee's definitive response to the challenges, and its objective
is to synthesize the diverse interests of nations into a global solution for the world
community. Procedurally, it becomes the formal document that guides the commission's
actions through amendments and votes. This intricate document follows a strict format,
encapsulating negotiation, debate and innovative proposals. Prior to formal submission,
approval by the Director is required, contingent upon the resolution demonstrating a nuanced
understanding of the issue, addressing the questions in the Background Guide.

A well-crafted resolution brings together several qualities, including familiarity with the
problem, recognition of relevant issues, conciseness and good form. The background and
previous UN actions should be mentioned, so that the resolution recognizes the real power
and influence of the commission. Ambiguous or inapplicable resolutions are discouraged.
Answering the "Questions to be answered by a resolution (QARMAS)" is essential, and each
clause and sentence should have a purpose, avoiding clumsy grammar or sloppy formatting.

The heading of the resolution includes the name of the committee, the signatories, and the
topic. Preambulatory clauses precede operative clauses, providing context, recalling past
actions, explaining the purpose of the resolution, and supporting subsequent actions.
Operative clauses are numbered and articulate actions, each initiated with an underlined
participle and concluded with a semicolon or period for the last clause.

While compromise is encouraged, it is not mandatory, recognizing the imperative of

safeguarding national interests. Resolutions need not be based on compromise alone, and
delegates should not feel compelled to unduly compromise national interests for the sake of
consensus. Acceptance by the dias requires that the resolution can be adopted in its present
form, addressing all the issues identified in the Background Guide.

Amendments
Given that not all details can be resolved before introducing resolutions, it is anticipated that
amendments will be proposed during the session. The amendment process enables delegates
to modify specific parts of a resolution without discarding the entire document, enhancing
consensus by accommodating changes on contentious sections. It is crucial for delegates to
discern the impact of amendments on the committee's direction. Non-substantive
amendments can complicate proceedings without contributing meaningfully. In RaiMUN,
there are no friendly amendments, and a resolution cannot be altered post-introduction
without a vote, emphasizing the importance of procedural considerations in the amendment
process.
 ©HARVARD MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2022 GUIDE TO DELEGATE PREPARATION

© LEIDEN MODEL UNITED NATIONS

 Rules of Procedure (RoP)
GENERAL RULES:
1. RULE #1 - SCOPE: These rules will be applied to all committees in the General Assembly,
Economic and Social Council and Regional Bodies. Rules for specialized agencies may vary
for each committee, although special rules will be based on this document, which is why all
delegates are encouraged to become familiar with these basic rules. Committee directors
may provide variations to these rules. If this is the case, those rules will always take
precedence over these in the event of a conflict.

2. RULE #2 - LANGUAGE: English will be the official and working language of the conference.
Committees carried out in Spanish and Italian represent an exception to this rule.

3. RULE #3 - DELEGATIONS: Each delegation will be represented by one or two delegates,

depending on the committee, and will have the right to one vote. Representatives of observer
and non-member states will have the same rights as those of full members, except that they
may not vote on any substantive issues. Representatives of the Press Corps will also have the
same rights as those of full members, except that they may not vote on any issues, both
procedural and substantive.

4. RULE #4 – STATEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS: The Secretary-General or a member of the

Secretariat or Executive staff may at any time make either written or oral statements to the
committee. The director may also interrupt committee procedure to allow for a presentation,
guest speaker, or expert witness. Additionally, the director or moderator may allow a Press
Corps delegate to speak upon being introduced to the committee.

5. RULE #5 - QUORUM: A quorum is the minimum number of delegates that must be present
for the debate to start. The director may declare a committee open and permit debate to
proceed when at least one-quarter of the members of the committee are present. The
presence of a majority of the members will be required for any substantive vote. A quorum
will be assumed to be present unless specifically challenged and shown to be absent. A roll
call is never required to determine the presence of a quorum.

6. RULE #6 - COURTESY: Delegates will show courtesy and respect to the committee staff and
to other delegates. No talking is allowed in the committee room, except during an
unmoderated caucus or when recognized by the dais. The moderator will immediately call to
order any delegate who fails to comply with this rule.
7. RULE #7 – ELECTRONIC DEVICES: The use of electronic devices by delegates is forbidden in
the committee room during formal debates or moderated caucuses. These devices include
but are not limited to laptops, tablets, smartphones, and smartwatches. Electronics may be
used outside the committee room, during moderated or unmoderated caucuses.

8. RULE #8 - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: In the Raimondi Model United Nations Conference, the
use of artificial intelligence in any official document is strictly forbidden and will be verified
by employing a special program for its detection. If any delegate is found to be misusing
these technologies, he/she/they will be immediately declared unawardable without the right
of appeal.

RULES GOVERNING DEBATE

9. RULE #9 – MODERATED CAUCUS: The purpose of the moderated caucus is to facilitate

substantive debate at critical junctures in the discussion. In a moderated caucus, the
moderator will temporarily depart from the speakers’ list and call on delegates to speak at his
or her discretion. A motion for a moderated caucus is in order at any time when the floor is
open, prior to closure of debate. The delegate presenting the motion must briefly explain its
purpose and specify a time limit for the caucus as well as the time limit per speech. A simple
majority is required to pass. The moderator may end a moderated caucus early at his or her
discretion.

10. RULE #10 – UNMODERATED CAUCUS: The purpose of an unmoderated caucus is to

facilitate negotiation and drafting of documents. A motion for an unmoderated caucus is in
order at any time when the floor is open, prior to closure of debate. The delegate presenting
the motion must specify a time limit for the caucus but is not required to specify a purpose. A
simple majority is required to pass. The moderator may rule the motion dilatory or end the
unmoderated caucus early at his or her discretion.

11. RULE #11 – CONSULTATION OF THE WHOLE: Delegates may motion for a consultation of the
whole when the floor is open for points or motions, prior to the closure of debate. The rules of
parliamentary procedure will be suspended to carry out an informal discussion in the
committee room. The delegate raising the motion must specify the topic and the total time
limit of the consultation of the whole, which should not exceed ten minutes. The motion will
be put to a vote and requires simple majority to pass. During the consultation of the whole,
the delegate who presented the motion will speak first, and may then choose to select all
speakers and moderate the whole motion, or to enable each delegation to select the next
speaker. The chair may rule the motion dilatory or end the consultation of the whole at any
point at his or her discretion.
RULES GOVERNING POINTS
12. RULE #12 – POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE: Whenever a delegate experiences personal
discomfort that impairs his or her ability to participate in the proceedings, he or she may rise
to a point of personal privilege. This point may interrupt a speaker only if the speaker is
inaudible, and delegates should use this power with the utmost discretion.

13. RULE #13 – POINT OF ORDER: During the discussion of any matter, a delegate may rise to a
point of order to indicate an instance of improper parliamentary procedure. The point of order
will be immediately decided by the moderator in accordance with these rules of procedure.
The moderator may rule out of order those points which are improper. A representative rising
to a point of order may not speak on the substance of the matter under discussion. A point of
order may not interrupt a speaker.

14. RULE #14 – POINT OF PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY: When the floor is open, a delegate may rise
to a point of parliamentary inquiry to ask the moderator a question regarding the rules of
procedure. A point of parliamentary inquiry may never interrupt a speaker. Delegates with
substantive questions should not rise to this point, but should rather approach or send a note
to the committee dais.

PRECEDENCE
15. RULE #15 – PRECEDENCE OF POINTS AND MOTIONS DURING DEBATE: This refers to the
hierarchy established between the different types of motions. They will be considered in the
following order of precedence: Point of personal privilege, Point of order, Point of
parliamentary inquiry, Adjournment of debate, Suspension of debate, Unmoderated caucus,
Consultation of the whole, Moderated caucus, Motion to change the speaking time,
Introduction of draft resolutions, Introduction of amendments, Postponement of debate,
Resumption of debate, Closure of debate.

16. RULE #16 – PRECEDENCE OF POINTS AND MOTIONS AFTER CLOSURE OF DEBATE: When the
final voting procedure starts, only the following points of motions may be presented, in the
following order of precedence: Point of personal privilege, Point of order, Point of
parliamentary inquiry, Reordering of draft resolutions, Division of the question, Roll call voting.

The rest of the rules of parliamentary procedure can be found in several PDFs per
language on the following link (https://bit.ly/ropraimun). Below is a table of motions for
ease of reference
©PROMOTORA INTERNACIONAL DE DEBATES DEL PERU FOR RAIMONDI MODEL UNITED NATIONS 2018
 AWARDS POLICY
At RaiMUN we are primarily concerned with providing each delegate with an enjoyable and
educational experience. We strongly believe that this conference is an opportunity for students to
learn about international relations, public speaking and the challenges of high-stakes diplomacy
through first-hand experience. Above all, we hope that delegates will leave the conference as global
citizens better informed and empowered to act on the international stage. However, we also value
the recognition of students and delegations who have contributed to the conference in an
exemplary manner. At the closing ceremonies, the Secretariat will announce the individual and
delegation awards.

Each Committee Director, in consultation with his or her committee staff, will determine individual
awards based on the following criteria:

- Ability to work with and persuade other delegates through detailed explanations and convincing
arguments;
- Quality of position papers and attendance at all committee meetings;
- Compliance with all RaiMUN policies;
- Demonstrated willingness to compromise, while still adhering to the policies and interests of the
individual, media outlet or country assigned;
- Ability to develop and convey pragmatic and workable solutions, both orally and in writing;
- Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the intricacies of the subject(s) being addressed,
- Skill and effectiveness in caucusing, resolution writing and debate.

Approximately 4 awards will be given per committee: one Best Delegate, one Outstanding Delegate
and one Honorable Mention and one Verbal Commendation.

* The final number will be at the discretion of the directors of each committee and the
secretariat.

In double delegation committees, if applicable, pairs of delegates will be evaluated and recognized
together.

The Secretariat shall determine the awards for delegations based on their overall performance.
Delegations are eligible in one of two categories, small and large delegations:

Delegations whose size is equal to or less than 13 delegates are eligible as Small Delegations.
(Please note that if less than 5 delegates show up on the day of the conference, the school
automatically becomes ineligible for a delegation award).

Delegations whose size exceeds 14 delegates will be classified as Large Delegations. Awards will be
given to the best large delegation, outstanding large delegation, the best small delegation and
outstanding small delegation. (Please note that in the case of large delegations, the more
delegates are absent during the conference, the more points each school will be penalized in
consideration for delegation awards).
* Notes on delegation awards do not apply to individual awards.
 Communication
In case of any inconvenience, delegates may communicate with their directors via their
committee chat during the session. It is strictly forbidden to communicate via private
WhatsApp chat with any director unless it is during an unmoderated caucus. If a delegate
does so, he/she will be sanctioned (Communicating via WhatsApp with any director before
the conference is strictly forbidden). The delegate should limit his or her communication
with the director to committee sessions only. If the delegate wishes to communicate with his
or her director after the session has ended, he or she should do so only by e-mail or wait until
the next session. Only in case of major inconvenience, delegates may contact their committee
directors via WhatsApp.

They should communicate the problem they are having to their directors, as well as their
faculty advisor. The faculty advisor may contact one of the following emails to resolve the
problem.

● llopez@raimondi.edu.pe (Mr. Leonardo Lopez - Faculty Advisor)

● info.mun@raimondi.edu.pe (Ms. Sofia Vargas - Secretary General) & Secretariat
● +39 331 214 2669 (RaiMUN 2024 Official WhatsApp Account)
Please note that many people may be trying to reach the same person at the same time and it
will take longer to respond to your message to resolve your problem. All communications
with a staff member should always be formal. This applies to both delegates and other faculty
advisors. Sanctions will be applied if a participant is disrespectful in any way to a staff
member.

If a delegate is found referring to his or her directors for irrelevant matters or in informal
and/or disrespectful language, he or she will be immediately disqualified. Should this
occur after the conference has ended, the delegate will not be allowed to participate in
our next year's conference. In particular situations, these sanctions may be modified
depending on the severity of the action; the Secretary and school administrators will
determine the sanction applied.

The school administration reserves the right to make a decision regarding possible
penalties for misconduct.
 Faculty Advisors and Coaches’
Rules of Procedure

Faculty Advisors (FA) are the teachers that lead student groups to Model UN Conferences The
Faculty Advisor provides academic advising and support to students from his or her school.

The main functions of the faculty advisor include:

Effective academic counseling and advising for students, and services such as assistance
in student recruitment.

Provide information, resolve routine problems, or otherwise respond to legitimate

requests.

The role of a faculty advisor is that of a mentor guide and differs categorically from that
of a task-specific advisor.

Responsible for supervising your delegates at all times and ensuring that they follow
conference rules, including but not limited to those outlined in the Delegate Handbook and
Code of Conduct.

The faculty advisor must be aware of delegation and what happens when it is not a
committee.

The faculty advisor should help maintain the committee's decorum, especially on the large
General Assembly committees. We will report any disruptive behavior to advisors and request
that advisors discipline delegates accordingly.

Dress Code:
Faculty advisors are models of formality for students at MUN conferences. Formality is highly
appreciated by coaches, students, and faculty advisors. If a faculty advisor does not come
dressed appropriately, we will please ask them to change their clothing. The dress code at
RaiMUN is formal and all delegates, coaches, and faculty advisors are expected to wear
Western business attire to all committee sessions. Faculty advisors should ensure that all
delegates wear appropriate Western business attire during all committee sessions.