Presentation
Presentation
Presentation
PLAN
1. The future through art. How do you understand the role of art in
imagining the future?
Art is a powerful medium that helps humanity explore and shape its vision of
the future. It serves as both a mirror to current realities and a window into
possibilities. Artists use their works to examine societal values, fears, and
aspirations, imagining futures that range from utopian to dystopian. Through
creativity, art helps society:
1)Critique the present: Artists question current norms, systems, and behaviors,
pointing out flaws that could lead to undesirable futures.
2)Warn of potential dangers: Art can serve as a cautionary tale, highlighting
the consequences of unchecked technological or societal developments (e.g.,
Orwell’s 1984).
3)Inspire hope: By envisioning utopian futures or innovations that solve major
problems, art motivates society to work toward positive change.
4)Bridge emotions and intellect: Art connects people emotionally to abstract
ideas, making complex future scenarios more relatable and understandable.
4. Research Questions
The creators imagined both utopias and dystopias, showing what could go
right or wrong.
II
1)Who is Stanislavsky?
2)My play deals with the lack of communication due to too rapid technological
advancement, and I believe Stanislavski's system is the most suitable for staging
it. Why?
The essence of the system and its uniqueness is that Stanislavski suggests that
the actor seeks the truth in art, that is, to make the play so real that the audience
believes in every emotion and action on stage.
- The magical "if" allows actors to imagine themselves in the shoes of their
characters: "What would I do if I were in these circumstances?" This is perfect
for the theme of my play, where the characters are faced with inner emptiness,
disconnection from real communication, and loss of themselves.
- Emotional memory gives the actors the opportunity to refer to their own
experiences and memories in order to feel more deeply the loneliness and
isolation in question.
3)Why Stanislavski?
"The Cherry Orchard" premiered on January 17, 1904 at the Moscow Art
Theatre (MHT). The director of the production was Konstantin Sergeyevich
Stanislavsky, one of the founders of the theater. This performance was a
landmark event, as it was not only the first staging of Chekhov's play, but also
his last work, completed shortly before the writer's death.
Stanislavsky saw The Cherry Orchard as a drama, despite the fact that Chekhov
himself considered it a comedy. The director interpreted the work as a tragedy
of loss, the conflict between the old and the new world, which was reflected in
the features of the production.
Stanislavsky sought to convey to the audience the idea of the tragedy of change
and the impossibility of reconciliation with them. Through the image of the
crumbling way of life at Ranevskaya's estate, he raised the issues of the loss of
spiritual values, the inability of man to adapt to change and the contradictions
between generations.
The super task was to show how people refuse to accept the new reality:
- The disconnection of characters who seem to live together but are emotionally
distant from each other.
My perception:
I was deeply impressed by the production. I saw in it not only the story of one
family, but also the universal conflict between past and future. I was particularly
moved by the scenes where the characters look at the cherry orchard, realizing
that they are losing it forever. This pain of loss was conveyed through the
sincere acting of the actors and the melancholy stage design.
The scenography for the play was developed by Viktor Simov. His approach
was aimed at creating a realistic environment, which enhanced the emotional
impact on the audience:
- Venue: The stage was traditional, using a full theatrical space. The centerpiece
was the symbolic image of a cherry orchard, conveyed through lighting effects
and minimalistic sets.
- Psychologism: All the characters were worked out in detail, their emotions
and actions looked logical and vital.
- Naturalness: The sets, costumes and behavior of the characters were as close
to real life as possible.
- Depth: Each scene had a subtext, thanks to which the viewer could
independently interpret the characters' feelings and motivations.
- Noise design: The sounds of nature - birds chirping, wind rustling in the
garden - created a sense of life offstage. In the finale of the performance the
sound of a broken string increased the drama of what was happening.
- Music: Chamber music was used, which emphasized the melancholy mood of
the production. Lyrical motifs were replaced by disturbing chords at key
moments.
- Costumes: They corresponded to the era - the clothes of the characters were
kept in the style of the early XX century. Ranevskaya's dresses emphasized her
aristocratic origins, while Lopakhin's costume reflected his practicality and
simplicity
6)Light: Stanislavski made extensive use of light to create emotional mood. For
example, the soft lighting in the flashback scenes and the cold light in the finale
heightened the sense of loss.
In addition, his method involves deep work on the character's task, which helps
to reveal the meaning of the characters' actions against the background of a
rapidly changing world. This makes the performance more integral and full.