Gec - Ambedkar Notes 1
Gec - Ambedkar Notes 1
Ambedkar advocated for a social system in which a man's rank is determined by his merit
and achievements, and no one is noble or untouchable because of his or her birth.
He argued for preferential treatment of the country's socially downtrodden and economically
exploited population. His contributions were multifaceted, ranging from legal reforms to
social activism and political leadership.
Dr Ambedkar played a pivotal role in drafting the Constitution of India, ensuring that
principles of equality, justice, and rights were enshrined within its framework. He advocated
for the rights of Dalits (formerly known as untouchables) and other oppressed groups,
emphasising education and empowerment as crucial tools for social up-liftment.
Despite attending school, Ambedkar and other untouchable children were kept apart and
received little attention or assistance from teachers.
They were not permitted to touch the water or the vessel that carried it. This task was
generally completed for the young Ambedkar by the school peon, and if the peon was
unavailable, he had to go without water; he later described the circumstance as "No peon,
No water" in his works.
In 1897, Ambedkar's family relocated to Mumbai, and he was the only untouchable student
at Elphinstone High School. In 1906, at the age of roughly 15, he married Ramabai, a 9
year old girl. Ambedkar received a Baroda State Scholarship for postgraduate studies at
Columbia University in New York City in 1913, when he was 22 years old. Ambedkar
obtained his Ph.D. in economics from Columbia in 1927.
In the ancient Indian approach, justice was concerned with the performance of duties, not
with the notion of rights. In ancient Indian tradition, there were two approaches ‘Dandaniti’
and ‘Dharma’, which were concerned with justice. ‘Dandaniti’ was very close to the modern
notions of justice (law and punishment).
It suggested the legal aspect of justice. Dharma was another name for the code of duties
and justice was nothing but virtuous conduct with dharma. Thus, like Platonic justice, the
Hindu tradition linked justice with performance of duties prescribed by dharma.
The modern approaches to justice are broadly Liberal and Marxist approaches. The Liberal
argument is that the individual’s rights and liberty are necessary for a just society, while the
Marxist approach relies upon equality for a just society.
The latter believe that unless and until the existing inequalities in society are removed,
society will not be just. The basic premises of justice are liberty, equality and rights.
The concept of social justice emerged out of a process of evolution of social norms, order,
law and morality. It laid emphasis upon just action and created space for intervention in the
society by enforcing rules and regulations based on the principles of social equality.
The term ‘social justice’ consists of two words: one is social and the second is justice. The
term ‘social’ is concerned with all human beings who live in society, while the term ‘justice’ is
related to liberty, equality and rights.
Thus, social justice is concerned with ensuring liberty, providing equality and maintaining
individual rights for every human being in society. In other words, securing the highest
possible development of the capabilities of all members of the society may be called social
justice.
Being a multi-dimensional concept, social justice has been viewed by scholars of law,
philosophy and political science differently. The term is quite comprehensive.
Social justice is a bundle of rights; it is the balancing wheel between the haves and
have-nots. It has a great social value in providing for a stable society and securing the unity
of the country. In general, social justice may be defined as ‘the rights of the weak, aged,
destitute, poor, women, children and other under-privileged persons’.
According to Professor R.M.W. Dias, ‘Justice is not something which can be captured in a
formula once and for all; it is a process, complex and shifting balance between many
factors’.
The tasks of justice are ‘the just allocation of advantages and disadvantages, preventing the
abuse of power, preventing the abuse of liberty, the just decision of disputes and adapting to
change’ (Dias, 1985).
Justice may be natural justice or distributive justice. Social justice is basically a term that
provides sustenance to the rule of law. It has a wider connotation in the sense that it
includes economic justice also. It aims at removing all kinds of inequalities and affording
equal opportunities to all citizens in social as well as economic affairs. Thus, the aim of
social justice is to remove all kinds of inequalities based upon caste, race, sex, power,
position and wealth and to bring about a balance between social rights and social controls.
The Hindu dharma, sought to be maintained by the ancient Hindu legal system, fully
supported the four Varnas (Varna is a Sanskrit word which means color or class. Ancient
hindu literature classified all humankind and all created beings into four varnas- The
Brahmins, The Kshatriyas, The Vaishyas and The Shudras) and the caste system. The
Hindu legal system refused to recognize the basic fundamental right that all humans are
born equal. The glaring inequalities and dehumanization based on the hierarchical caste
system, with its graded disabilities from birth and humiliating and degrading occupations
assigned to certain designated low castes to be followed by them till their death, were the
greatest bane of the Hindu society.
There was no scope for moulding a new social order that could guarantee social justice.
The caste system founded on Varnashrama dharma was the very negation of social justice.
The Hindu
Varnashrama dharma and the caste system pushed forth Brahmins as the highly privileged
caste with a high hereditary social status and stamped the vast majority of the people as
‘sudras’ and ‘untouchables’ fit for only manual labour. They were deprived of educational
opportunities and were condemned to a low social status. In course of time, the privileges
for the privileged class increased and the other classes became more and more oppressed
and depressed; such a social structure bred inequality in status and denial of equal
opportunities for all. It ushered in an unjust social order in the country.
Social justice in India seeks to remove the glaring inequalities in society based on such a
hierarchical caste system, with its graded disabilities from birth imposed on a large section
of Hindu society and the conferment of privileges and position of dominance of Brahmins,
which is a small section of the society.
He saw the caste system as the root cause of Hinduism's problems. According to him, the
varna system is the primary cause of all inequity, as well as the source of caste and
untouchability.
Ambedkar advocated for a social system in which a man's rank is determined by his merit
and achievements, and no one is noble or untouchable because of his or her birth.
The Indian Constitution, drafted under his supervision, has clauses ensuring justice,
liberty, equality, and fraternityfor all residents. It also includes many measures that
ensure preferential treatment for the oppressed in a variety of industries. Article 17 of the
Indian Constitution declares untouchability eradicated.
In his speech to the Constituent Assembly for the approval of the Constitution, Ambedkar
stated: “I have completed my work; I wish there should be a sunrise even tomorrow.
The new Bharat has got political freedom, but it is yet to raise the sun of social and
economic liberty”.
Conclusion
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's concept of social justice provides a foundational framework for
addressing contemporary socio-economic and political challenges. Embracing his vision
entails commitment to equality, dignity, and empowerment for all individuals, ensuring that
his legacy continues to guide efforts towards a more just and inclusive society.