Analysis and Themes WHistle and Ill Come to You
Analysis and Themes WHistle and Ill Come to You
Analysis and Themes WHistle and Ill Come to You
The weather in the extract mirrors the escalating fears of Arthur Kipps. As the storm
intensifies, so does Kipps' terror. The use of pathetic fallacy here is crucial; it creates an
ominous atmosphere and heightens the reader's sense of impending doom.
Through the simile describing the house as "a ship at sea," Hill underscores the
isolation and vulnerability of both the house and Arthur Kipps. The imagery evokes a
ship battered by a storm, emphasizing its precarious situation and, by extension, Kipps'
exposure to supernatural forces.
Susan Hill employs a variety of linguistic and structural techniques to instill fear and
convey Arthur Kipps' psychological transformation.
The use of violent verbs like "battered" and "roaring," along with plosive sounds, adds to
the sense of jeopardy. These choices in language enhance the reader's perception of
Kipps’ precarious situation and mirror his growing anxiety.
Kipps starts as a rational and logical character, but his grip on reality loosens as the
narrative progresses.
Hill uses a flashback to Kipps' childhood to afford him a moment of comfort amidst
chaos. The snug safety of his family home contrasts sharply with his current
vulnerability, emphasizing the psychological strain he endures. The sibilance in "snug
safety" draws attention to this fleeting sense of security, highlighting the drastic shift in
his circumstances.
The use of non-specific nouns like "somewhere" and "somewhat" creates an unsettling
ambiguity, enhancing the sense of mystery. Predatory descriptions, such as the wind
raging "like a lion," further depict Kipps as under attack.
Kipps' language begins to shift from logical to emotional, indicating his dwindling control.
He transitions from referencing facts to describing impressions and senses, signaling
his increasing reliance on intuition over reason.
The passive voice in "he was catapulted back into the present" reflects Kipps' loss of
control. Shorter sentences such as "I listened hard. Nothing." create pauses that
heighten anticipation and tension.
The reference to the wind like a banshee—a bad omen in folklore—creates a sense of
foreboding. Repetition of phrases related to the wind's violence and the child's cries
reinforce the relentless nature of the supernatural threat, increasing the reader’s
anxiety.
Kipps' earlier declaratives like "There was no child; I knew that" starkly contrast with his
later rhetorical questions, illustrating his internal conflict and fading grasp on logic. His
plea of "rest in peace" to the spirit indicates his cognitive dissonance, acknowledging
the supernatural despite his initial disbelief.
The darkness symbolizes the unknown and accentuates Kipps’ fear. When the lights go
out, symbolism of the unknown skyrockets, and Kipps' vulnerability becomes palpable.
The short, narrow corridor entraps Kipps physically and metaphorically. The door of the
nursery, previously locked but now open, is an inexplicable event challenging his core
beliefs. The adverb "inexplicably" underscores his struggle to find a rational explanation.
The rhetorical questions signify his confusion and desperation. Kipps shifts entirely to
emotional language, marked by "weeping tears of despair and fear." His violent
reaction—drumming his fists on the floorboards in rage—shows a complete loss of
control, contrasting sharply with his initial logical demeanor.
Ominous Calm: The Role of the Dog
Kipps finds a semblance of calm when the dog stays close by, offering companionship.
However, this calm is ominous; it doesn't signal the end of his ordeal. The relentless
storm and the child’s repetitive cries leave readers with a looming sense of unease.
The extract concludes without resolving the tension. Kipps remains trapped physically
and psychologically, and the relentless supernatural elements suggest that his ordeal is
far from over. This unresolved tension keeps the reader on edge, anticipating what
might come next.