Strategic Management Module-1
Strategic Management Module-1
CHAPTER 1
Part-1: Overview of Strategic
Management
The word "policy" can be used to cover matters ranging from high order strategy to
administrative detail. Policy can encompass a position, an intention or a plan on any issue
where the government or the organization needs to take action. To assure consistency and
uniformity of action, sound policy must be formulated. The dictionary meaning of the word
policy is or policy can mean:
The art or manner of governing nation or the line of conduct, which rulers of nation adopts
(Webster).
A plan of action, usually based on certain principles, decided on by a body or individual, or
a principle or set of principles on which to base decisions, or a course of conduct to be
followed (Chambers English Dictionary)
Policy/ Policies
Is a general guide to action? Typically it doesnt tell a person exactly what to do, but it
does point out the direction to go. (Newman)
Policy restricts the freedom of action and it is generally expressed in qualitative, conditional
and general way. Business policy is managements expressed or implied interest to govern
action in the pursuit of companys objectives. It is simply, the guide to action for the
successful achievement of the objectives of the enterprise.
For a business to function effectively, managers must base their decisions on governing
principles; because policy is basic to this effort. A definite statement of principles or
procedures will bring about an understanding of requirements for effective action or
management.
Policy is a means by which company objectives are effectively reconciled with internal
factors and organizational functions.
The objectives and decision making are contingent on internal factors. Managers must set
goals that are reasonable in accordance with internal factors the companys resources and
organizational functions, - and which involves various sections.
Policy is a statement of procedure or principle by which a company intends to realize its
objectives.
It insures proper direction toward definite objectives of a business in the light of internal
factors and organizational functions.
Effective policy making is one of the most important issues. Every aspect of policy making
should directly and indirectly improve the learning, development and wellbeing of
community.
Policies should be based on facts and sound judgment and should not continue merely
personal reflections. Since policies are intended to be general principles to guide future
actions, they should not prescribe detailed procedures. Policies should be subject to
evaluation. From time to time policies must be evaluated so that changes or innovations may
be corporate. It should, as far as possible, be stated in writing.
Policies may be the explicit declarations in writing or may be inferred from the behavior
of members of an organization.
Policy formulation is a function of all managers in an organization. However, higher
level managers play a much more important role in policy making.
These are policy characteristics which are necessary to solving the policy problem:
Flexibility, Comprehensiveness, Coordination, and Ethics.
1.6. What is good policy?
Good policy is beneficial.
o Good policy creates public value. Policy change should benefit individuals,
organizations and services.
Good policy is necessary.
o A clear rationale for a new policy or revising an existing policy is an essential first
step.
Good policy has an end in mind.
o The direction to be set, or the problem to be fixed by policy change, must be clear
from the outset. Good policy making considers both the immediate short term and
longer term systems impact.
Good policy aligns with the goals.
o Policy is an instrument of change that must be attuned to corporate goals.
Good policy is well informed, concise and rigorous.
o Good policy uses evidence and information as the basis for analysis which should in
turn be rational, comprehensive, thorough and balanced. Quantitative and qualitative
information should be applied.
Good policy is ethical.
Good policy is transparent.
o The processes used to develop policy need to be clearly communicated and widely
understood. They should engage those individuals and organizations who will be
affected by policy change from the outset.
Good policy is intelligible.
o Clarity and economy are essential features of good policy. Policy should be described
in as few words as possible with clear messages which are readily understood. A good
policy should be in plain English.
Good policy is open to change and improvement.
o All policy documents are constructed, published and written in a particular time and
place. They should be reviewed, refreshed, replaced as we move forward.
o Government policies
Government policies for reservation of certain products for public sectors, private sectors and
small scale sector, industrial licensing, export-import control act, control of wealth in few
hands, price amalgamation and merger, expansion, foreign exchange regulation act, etc
exercises significant influences on business policy.
o Technology
Technological development forces the management to go for it. If the organization doesnt
adopt the advanced technology it cannot face risk and return of technological obsolesces.
Therefore, the nature of technology cost and risk involved in it are the determinants of
technology.
o Social and political environment
It is known that enterprises deal with people, religion, cultural and ethnic dimensions of
social environment. The social environment consists of the views, pressures and inter-
relationship of various sections of the society. Therefore, enterprises must keep in mind the
above noted facts into consideration while formulating the policies.
o Business objectives
Business objectives are concerned with profitability, market share, growth, diversification,
social responsibility, etc Therefore, policy makers should take into account the objectives
of business while formulating the corporate policy.
o Management philosophy
Management philosophy exercises a significant influence on policy formulation. Autocratic
and paternalistic management formulates the policies without consulting subordinates. And
participative and democratic management consults while formulating the policies.
1.9. Merits and demerits of policy
The merits or importance of policy can be understood from the following points.
Policies are the guideline for the member of organization to take decision and action in a
specific situation, which may occur frequently under similar conditions. Without policy
guidelines, decisions taken at different levels of management may be inconsistent with
the basic aim and the philosophy of the company.
Policies help to accomplish the predetermined goals and objectives and prevent unwanted
deviations from planned course of action.
Written down policies serve as a means of communication and help to avoid
misunderstandings between employees and management.
Written down policies provide a frame of reference to management and subordinates. The
framed policies save the time of managers in taking decisions for recurring nature of
problems.
Every policy should have an alternative which may be used in the situation when original
policy doesnt work. The environmental analysis will reveal the strength, weakness and risk
of an organization, which will lead to generate alternative policies.
1.14. Evaluation of policy alternatives
Alternative policy should be evaluated in terms of their contribution to corporate goals. The
effectiveness of policy can be tested by evaluating the profitability, growth, and image of the
company in the minds of customers.
Policy making is a continuous and complex task that crosses all levels of the departments
work, ranging from the most general to the most specific. A well designed policy document
is more likely to be better received and understood.
Principles - a description of the principles that have shaped the development of the policy
and their effect on the way in which it should be applied
Responsibility - Identification of those responsible for implementing the policy and what
is expected of them
Policy statement - the policy itself
Evaluation process - a description of the way in which the impact of the policy will be
assessed and a timeline for this
Review date - a date for review of the policy
Document and version control - the document and author name version, sign off and
publication date
Contacts, supporting tools and resources people - as a minimum, a contact person who
can assist with inquiries about the policy and any other tools or supporting materials that
will help the policy to be understood and successfully implemented.
Review Questions
Define what policy does mean?.
List the concepts that are common to any business policy
Identify and explain types of business policies?
can you list the reason behind having policies?
List the criteria that have to be considered in good policy selection?
Identify the Merits and Demerits of policy?
2
CHAPTER
The Nature of Strategy and
Strategic Management
Brief Contents
2 .1 Introduction What Is Strategy?
Managers must be able to act on uncertain predications of unknown future, and seek out
sources of innovation in the way their business operates and competes; and they must also be
able to implement effective change and to align collective objectives in their organization to
allow new capabilities and skills to be developed.
The allocation of resources necessary for carrying out these goals/ the activities.
Is the pattern or plan that integrates organizations major goals, policies, and action
sequences into a cohesive whole.
A well-formulated strategy helps to marshal and allocate organizations resources
into a unique and viable posture based upon its
relative internal competences and shortcomings,
anticipated changes in the environment, and
Contingent moves by intelligent opponents.
is the pattern of objectives, purposes or goals and the major policies and plans for achieving
these goals, stated in such a way as to define
what business the company is in or is to be in and
The kind of company it is or it to be.
Is all about competitive advantage.
The sole purpose of strategic planning is to enable a company to gain efficient and a
sustainable edge over its competitors.
Corporate strategy thus implies an attempt to alter a companys strength relative to
that of its competitors in the most efficient way.
Competitive advantage refers to what sets the organization apart from others and provides
with a distinctive edge in the market place.
2.1.1. The role of strategy in success
Effective strategy can have a significant impact on the organizations success through the
creation of dynamic match between the organization and its environment, and how managers
play central role in making that happen. Strategy is integrative and cross-functional which
concerned to the whole organization interaction with environment. It has a long-term horizon
and its projection and forecast to uncertain future.
The role or purpose of strategy is to identify the potential for competitive advantage within
an industry in terms of the factors that determine a firms ability to survive and prosper. To
survive and prosper in an industry, a firm must meet customers needs and survive
competition.
Strategy is source of competitive advantage; and helps to achieve success, but it does not
guarantee. Soundly formulated and efficiently implemented strategy is the key to success.
The key common factor or ingredient for success is to have a soundly formulated and
effectively implanted strategy.
Successful
strategy
Effective implementation
Long-term, Profound
Objective
simple and understanding of
appraisal of
agreed the competitive
resources
objectives environment
The features of strategy that contribute to the success are such as:
Goals should be simple, consistent, and long term.
o Clarity of goals
Profound understanding of the competitive environment.
o Deep and insightful appreciation of the arena in which one is competing or
understanding the battlefield conditions where it would engage them.
Objective appraisal of resources.
o Emphasizing upon exploiting internal strength to the fullest and protecting areas of
weakness.
Effective implementation.
o Not only the strategies are sound, but their implementation is also effective.
o Having effective leaders; eager to make decisions, to implement them, and to demand
loyalty and commitment from subordinates.
o Be structured to implement the strategies effectively. Structures and systems that
permitted the effective exploitation of the specialized skills and individual organization
members with the coordination and communication needed to integrate these individual
effects and focus them upon achieving the underlying strategic goal.
The role of strategy in success can be made in relation to most fields of human endeavor.
Whether we look at warfare, chess, politics, sport, or business, successful individuals and
organizations are seldom the outcome of some random process or the superiority in initial
endowments of skills and resources.
Strategies that build upon the above four elements almost always play an influential role.
High achievers in any competitive area or successful individuals in terms of recognition,
power, and material rewards are not, most commonly, those with the greatest innate abilities.
Central to the success of individuals within each of their highly competitive spheres is the
pursuit of strategies that share the same elements identified above, i.e.
Having clear, long-term career objectives.
knowing their environment
Tend to be fast learner in terms of understanding the game
knowing themselves well
Appreciate their strengths and weaknesses
pursuing their careers with commitment, consistency and determination
Hence, to be successful clear objectives, understanding the environment, resource appraisal,
and effective implementation are very vital.
2.1.2. A framework for analyzing business strategy
The framework views strategy as forming a link between the firm and its environment. The
task of business strategy is determining how the firm will deploy its resources within its
environment and satisfying the long-term goals, and how to organize itself to implement that
strategy.
The firm combines three sets of key characteristics: Goals & values; Resources &
capabilities; and Structure & system.
The external environment of the firm comprises the whole range of economic, social,
political, and technological factors that influence a firms decisions and its performance.
However, for most strategy decisions, the core of firms external environment is its industry,
which is defined by its relationships with customers, competitors, and suppliers.
2.1.3 Strategic Issues
A key skill for strategists to develop is the ability to recognize those issues facing an
organization that are strategic.
Strategic issues are those which, if they are not addressed appropriately, will severely affect
(handicap) the organizations ability to function effectively. They can be characterized by
developments inside or outside an organization that are likely to have an important impact on
its ability to meet or determine its purpose and objectives.
Strategic issues are important to an organization and have biggest impact, and they are
identified by strategic analysis.
Benefits of identifying strategic issues (problems)
Strategic issues
creates pressure or tension in the organization
gives a clue about how to resolve the problems identified
Enable management to see that there will be consequences to the organization if the issues
are not handled well.
give attention to focus on which is really important to the organization
A helpful way of identifying strategic issues might be by reference to the (military)
distinction between strategy and tactics:
Strategy is concerned with all levels, but it is helpful to create a classification that can help us
to focus our attention at any one time. The hierarchies/ levels of strategy in organization are
the following three.
Corporate strategy
Business strategy
External environment
Resource Strategic
requirement managemen Organization
t al structure
Strategic
Harambee University College 27 | P a g e
control
Business Policy and Strategic Management 2012/20
Strategic planning
Strategic planning is the process of determining what an organization intends to be in the
future and how it will get there.
It is envisioning about the future and developing necessary procedures and operations.
Strategic planning developing objectives for an organization and its sub part, alternatives
courses of action to reach these objectives and doing these on the basis of SWOT
The purpose of strategic planning is to enable organizations to gain a sustainable age over its
competitors.
Aspects of strategic planning
Future aspect
o Future oriented; Recognizes environment will charge; Anticipate events than react as they
occur.
External aspects
o Takes into account external environment
Internal aspects
o Staff stability; Change in leadership
Dynamic aspect
o Continues process; Changing objectives and strategies in light of shifting circumstances
within the environment.
Finding the fit
There should be fit among the three sets of forces.
1. What you intend to accomplish?
o Vision, mission, objectives
2. What is needed and feasible?
o Opportunity and threat
3. What you are capable of doing?
o Strength and weakness
Important points to strategic planning
The 1st step in strategic planning is Planning to plan or get organized.
Strategic planning
is way of thinking and ongoing process, but never perfect or complete.
has to be continuously improved
Harambee University College 29 | P a g e
Business Policy and Strategic Management 2012/20
increased by globalization, new technology formation of new enterprises and the dissolving
of industry boundaries. Acquiring deep insight into the determinants of business success is
the basis for developing sound strategy.
Strategic management
Strategic management is all about managing an enterprise/ organization to achieve superior
performance. At the heart of strategic management the main question is: Why & how do some
firms outperform others?
Strategic management consists of analysis, decisions, and actions of organizations
undertakings to create and sustain competitive advantages. It is the process of guiding
members of an organization and its stake holders to envision about the future and to develop
necessary procedures / operations to achieve their goals or be successful in the future
Strategic management is plans and actions that lead to superior competitive standing.
What changes and trends are occurring in the competitive environment?
Who are our competitors and what are their strengths and threats?
Who are our customers?
What products/ services should we offer? How can be offering them most efficiently?
What does the future hold for our industry?
How can we change the rule of the game?
Strategic management is a set of decision and actions used to formulate and execute
strategies that will provide a competitive superior fit between the organization and its
environment so as to achieve organizational goals. It includes environmental scanning
(analysis), strategic implementation, strategic formulation and evaluation and control. And
it also entails three ongoing processes: analysis, decision and action resource allocation
The essence of strategic management is
To identify the sources of profit available to the business enterprise, and
To formulate and implement strategies that exploits these sources of profit.
Key attributes of strategic management
There are four key attributes of strategic management. They are strategic management
Directed towards overall organization goals and objectives
External analysis
(external environment) Strategic control
Direction Setting
Vision Develop control
Mission Generate evaluative & Allocate & merge Build relationship systems, measure
Value & design
selective strategies strategies & evaluate
Goals/ objectives structure performance
Internal analysis (internal
environment)
To develop and mobilize people and other assets in the organization, leaders are needed. No
longer can organizations be effective if the top does the thinking and the rest of the
organization does the work.
Brief Contents
3 .1 Defining vision and mission of an organization
The first direction setting task is defining mission what business the company will be in, and
forming a strategic vision of where the organization needed to go. Managers have to think
strategically about where they are trying to take the company. Developing a carefully
reasoned answer pushes managers to consider what the companys business character. What
the company seeks to do and to become is commonly termed the companies situation.
Managements concept of the business needs to be supplemented with a concept of the
companys future business make up and future direction.
3.1.1 What is Vision?
Managements view of the kind of company it is trying to create and its intent to stake out a
particular business position represents a strategic vision for the company.
Vision defines the desired or intended future state of an organization or enterprise in terms of
its fundamental objective and/or strategic direction.
For example a charity working with the poor might have a vision statement which read "A
world without poverty"
Vision
is a statement about a companys long-term direction.
hope for the reality to be
desired situation opposing the existing situation
not realized in short or ones life time.
Keeps an organization moving forward.
Should be a description of the desired outcome of the strategic plan.
Organizations need a vision based on a set of values that everyone in share. Vision is used to
set out a 'picture' of the organization in the future. Vision is what keeps an organization
moving forward even against discouraging odds. Visions are broad, but point where to go.
Vision must be compelling, inspiring and make people want to join the organization. It is the
banner, around which the organization rallies, since it is the driving force that keeps the
organization move towards a feasible by inspired future conditions. If vision is vivid and
meaningful enough, people can do outstanding things to bring to realization. However, if it is
lacking, no amount of resources will induce people to move forward.
Vision Statement is a statement of the future ideal you are working towards. It outlines what
the organization wants to be, or how it wants the world in which it operates to be. It provides
inspiration and the basis for all the organization's planning. It concentrates on the future and
provides clear decision-making criteria.
The advantage of having a vision statement is that
it creates value for those who get exposed to the statement, and those prospects are
managers, employees and sometimes even customers.
It creates a sense of direction and opportunity.
It is an essential part of the strategy-making process.
Purpose of Vision
Shared vision is an initial force that brings people together.
Clearly articulated vision can provide energy, momentum and strengths to individuals.
It inspires stakeholders.
It is life-blood of an organization.
It helps to see what you are working towards.
It provides bases for partnership and incentive to work through internal conflict.
It binds an organization together in times of crises.
Therefore, a firms vision is determined by asking the following questions:
What would the country lose if our organization ceased to exist?
Why do we want to dedicate our creative energies to this organizations effort?
What does our organization do to fill basic human needs?
what does our organization do that impact the country?
A vision is the hope for the reality to be to replace the reality that is.
Why is a strategic vision important?
A managerial imperative exists to look beyond today and think strategically about
impact of new technologies
how customers needs & expectations are changing
what it will take to outrun competitors
which promising market opportunities ought to be aggressively pursued
External and internal factors driving what a company needs to do to prepare for the
future.
Features of an effective vision statement include:
Clarity and lack of ambiguity
Vivid and clear picture
Purpo
se
It is believed that leaders will find it easier to create employees with commitment and
enthusiasm if they choose a purpose aimed at a higher ideal.
What is the organization?
For whose benefit is all the effort being put in?
Why should a manager or an employee do more than the minimum required?
Strategy
To achieve a purpose, there needs to be a strategy.
If the purpose is to be the best, there must be a strategy explaining the principles
around which the company will become the best.
Behavior Standards
Purpose and strategy are empty intellectual thoughts unless they can be converted into
action.
By translating purpose and strategy into actionable policies and standards senior managers
can dramatically change the performance of the employees.
Human beings are emotional. To capture the emotional energy of an organization the mission
needs to provide some philosophical or moral rationale for behavior to run alongside the
commercial rationale. This brings us to the next elements of our definition of mission.
Values
Values are the beliefs and moral principles that lie behind the organizations culture.
Values give meanings to norms and behaviors in the organization.
In many organizations, organizational values are not explicit and can only be understood by
perceiving the philosophical rational that lies behind management behavior.
Values can provide a rational for behavior that is just as strong as strategy.
A strong mission exists when the four elements of mission reinforce each other. This is most
easily perceived by looking at the links between the strategy and the value system and
whether both can be acted out through the same behavior standards.
A mission should:
define what the company is
define what the company aspires to be
limited to exclude some ventures
broad enough to allow for creative growth
distinguish the company from all others
Should not be so narrow to restrict the organizations activities nor should it be too
broa to make itself meaningless.
Clear:
Should be clear enough to lead to action.
Should not be a high sounding set platitudes meant for publicity purposes.
Motivating:
Should be motivating for members of the organization or being its customers.
Distinctive:
The indiscriminate one (random, arbitrary) is likely to have little impact.
If all defined their mission in a similar fashion, there would not be much of a
difference among them.
If defined as providing value for money, for years it created an important distinction
in the public mind.
indicate major components of strategy:
Along with the organizational purpose should indicate the major components of the strategy
to be adopted.
indicate how objectives are to be accomplished:
Besides indicating the broad strategies to be adopted, it should also provide clues regarding
the manner in which the objectives are to be accomplished.
They define not what kind of people we are but what we do such as commitment to
excellence and empowerment.
Operational Values:-
These are related to day-to-day operations of different parts of the organization.
They define how things are done.
Acceptance of the values represented by mission can lead to three characteristics of firms
that accomplish this acceptance.
Values stand for something
The way in which business is to be conducted is widely understood.
Values are accepted by all employees
Through the firms organization structure from topmost level of management down to the
lowest level of production jobs
Employees feel special because of a sense of identity which distinguishes the firm from other
firms.
When you have something you want to accomplish, it is important to set both goals and
objectives. The two key sides of writing goals and objectives: be persistent with your goals,
but flexible.
Objectives are brief, clear statements that describe the desired learning outcomes of
instruction.
Goals are what we want to achieve. Goals (aims) are where you want to go. Objectives are
how you are going to get.
Goals express intended outcomes in general terms and objectives express them in specific
terms. Objectives are short but clear statements about the specific outcomes. A goal is
something personal that you aim to become or have done. An objective is something that is a
requirement that should be met in any way possible. Goals are what you aim for, what you
want to obtain; objectives are the move or plan on how to achieve the goals. Goals are
written in broad, global, and sometimes vague, language. Objectives are statements that
describe the intended results of instruction in terms of specific student behaviors.
Goals are general directions that are not specific enough to be measured. On the other hand,
objectives are specific, measurable and set within a timeframe.
Goals are broad objectives are narrow.
Goals are general intentions; objectives are precise.
Goals are intangible; objectives are tangible.
Goals are abstract; objectives are concrete.
Goals can't be validated as is; objectives can be validated
Goals are what you set to achieve the mission of your organization or program. Goals
should include words such as "increase/decrease," "deliver," "improve" and "create."
Objectives are milestones that are along the way to reaching your goal.
In reality,
An aim is a target -something to which you aspire, or something you aim to achieve. An
objective on the other hand, is something that you can achieve.
o E.g.: My aim is to lose weight, but my objective is to lose one pound a week.
Goals are broad statement of desired outcomes what we hope will know and be able to
do as a result of completing the program/course. Objectives are clear, brief statements used
to describe specific measurable act.
Objectives are potential goals. Goals are accomplishments (things you wish to complete).
Aims are your ability to not be side tracked while reaching for your goals. Visions are
visualizing your entire task to complete a goal.
A goal is a target or a desired result. The aim is the process of orienting yourself and your
actions towards a goal or an ambition. An aim is like a relatively long term plan of action.
Goals are what you aim for, what you want to obtain; objectives are the move or plan on
how to achieve the goals target are the ones, the thing or the place where you must execute
the objectives to attain the goals.
Setting Objectives
Objective setting requires of all managers regardless of their position. Because every unit in
the organization need concert, measurable performance targets that contribute meaningfully
toward achieving company objectives.
An alternative approach to setting objectives is to write objectives such as: For the client/
customer to
identify what the need is
articulate the need
identify what needs to be done to meet the need
increase their self esteem / confidence so it is possible for them to act to meet their
needs
do what needs to be done to meet their needs.
Roles of Objectives
The achievement of corporate objectives should result in the fulfillment of the corporations
mission. Objectives play an important role in strategic management, such as
Objectives define the organizations relationship with its environment
By stating its objectives, an organization commits itself to what it has to achieve for its
employees, customers and the society at large.
Objectives help on organization pursue its mission and purpose
By defining the long-term position that an organization wishes to attain and the short-term
targets to be achieved
Objectives provide the basis for strategic decision making
By directing the attention of strategists to those areas where strategic decisions need to be
taken. Objectives lead to desirable standards of behavior and in this manner, help to
coordinate strategic decision making
Objectives provide the standard for performance appraisal
By stating goals and targets to be achieved in a given time period, and the measures to be
adopted, objectives lay down the standards against which organization as well as individual
performance would have no clear and definite basis for evaluating its performance.
Characteristics of Objectives
Objectives as measures of organizational behavior and performance should possess certain
desirable characteristics in order to be effective. Such characteristics are manly:
Objectives should be understandable:
Objectives play an important role in strategic management and are put to use in a variety of
ways. They should be understandable by those who have to achieve them.
If something is not understandable by managers no action will be taken or ever a wrong
action might be taken.
Objectives should be concrete and specific
Better to say Our Company plans to achieve a 12% increase in sale than our company
seeks to increase its sales. The first statement implies a concrete and specific objective and
is more likely to lead and motivate the managers.
Objectives should be related to a time frame
If objectives are related to a time frame, then managers knew the duration within which they
have to be achieved. If the statement given above is restricted as our company plans to
increase its sales by 12% by the end of two years it enhances the specificity of objectives.
Objectives should be measurable and controllable:
Many organizations perceive themselves as companies, which are attractive to work for. If
measures like the number and quality of job applications received, it would be possible to
measure and control the achievement of this objective with respect to comparable companies
in a particular industry and in general.
Objectives should be challenging
Objectives that are too high and too low are both de-motivating and, therefore, should be set
at challenging but not unrealistic levels. To set a high sales target in a declining market does
not lead to success and also a low sales target in a burgeoning (rapidly increasing, growing,
mushrooming) market is easily achievable and therefore, leads to sub-optimal performance.
Different objective should correlate with each other
Organizations set many objectives in different areas. If objectives set in one area are
disregarding the other areas, such an action is likely to lead to problems. Different objectives
correlate with each other are mutually supportive, and result in synergistic advantages. This
is specifically true for organizations, which operate on a profit center basis.
Objectives should be set within constraints
There are many constraints - internal as well as external, which have to be considered in
objective-setting. For example: resource availability is an internal constraint which affects
objective setting. Different objectives compete for scarce resources and tradeoffs are
necessary for optimum resource utilization. Organizations face many interests, and
environmental pollution. All these limit the organizations ability to set and achieve objective.
In sum, objective setting is a complex process; we will further examine a few issues relevant
to objective in order to understand this complex process.
Making Objectives SMART
You should create your objectives to be SMART. SMART objectives means
1. Specific (S)
Well defined, significant, stretching
Clear to anyone that has a basic knowledge of the project
Objectives must be clear and un ambiguous, vagaries and platitudes have no place in
objective /goal setting
When objectives are specific, they communicate exactly what is expected, when, and how
much
Focus, creates a powerful force: goal/objective power
The more focused your energies, the more power you generate
N.B:- Too many goals dilute focus, Optimal 2 - 3 goals per unit at any one time!
2. Measurable (M)
Measurable, meaningful, motivational
Know if the goal is obtainable and how far way the completion is
Know when it has been achieved
Track team progress ; help/ keep the team motivated
N.B:- A goal without a measurable outcome is like a sports competition without a
scoreboard or scorekeeper.
3. Attainable (A)
agreed upon achievable, acceptable, action-oriented
Agreement with all the stakeholders what the goals should be
Goals must be achievable and attainable by all employees.
The best goals require employees to stretch a bit to achieve them, but they are not
extreme.
Goals that are set too high or too low become meaningless, and employees naturally
come to ignore them.
N.B: Supervisors and managers must work with their employees to set goals.
4. Relevant (R)
Realistic, relevant, reasonable, rewarding, result-oriented
Goals must be aligned to the firms visions and mission
must be based on the current conditions and realities of the environment i.e. with the
availability of Rs, Knowledge and time
N.B: Unrealistic goals/ irrelevant goals
Make firms loss focus and goals are ignored.
Loss of team motivation
Employees feel overburdened, over whelmed and stressed out.
5. Time-bound (T)
Time-based, timely, tangible, traceable
Goals must have starting points, ending points and fixed durations.
Deadline bolsters employees commitment to achieving the goal.
Creates urgency
N.B:
N.B: Time must be measurable, attainable and realistic.
SMART goals = SMART organization
SMART goals propel firms fast forward.
CHAPTER
4. Analyzing Organizational Environment
Brief contents:
4.1. The external environment assessment/ analysis
The societal, or macro environment includes the general forces that do not directly touch on
the short-run activities of the organization but that can, and often does, influence its long-run
Harambee University College 58 | P a g e
Business Policy and Strategic Management 2012/20
decisions. Environmental analysis involves identifying the major present and future threats
and opportunities to or from the organizations principal constituents (components -
stakeholders, customers, competitors, suppliers, employees, and general public) along the
dimensions of the organizations economic, political/ legal, technological, and social
environments.
Characteristics of Environment
Business environment exhibits many characteristics. Some of the important and obvious
characteristics are briefly:-
Environment is complex
Environment consists of a number of factors, events, conditions and influences arising from
different sources. All these do not exist in isolation but interact with each other to create
entirely new sets of influences. All in all, environment is a complex phenomenon relatively
easier to understand in parts but difficult to grasp in its totality.
Environment is dynamic
Environment is constantly changing in nature. Due to many and varied influences operating,
there is dynamism in the environment causing it to continuously change its shape and
character.
Environment is multi-faceted
What shape and character an environment assumes depends on the perception of the
observer. Different observers may view a particular change in the environment, or a new
development, differently. This is frequently seen when one company welcomes the same
development, as an opportunity while another company perceives it as a threat.
Environment has a far-reaching impact on organizations.
The growth and profitability of an organization depends critically on the environment in
which it exists and environmental change has an impact on the organizations is several
different ways.
Since the environment is complex, dynamic, & multi-faceted and has a far-reaching impact,
impact,
dividing it into external and internal components enables us to understand it better.
Environment is further classified as external and internal, it includes all the factors outside
the organization, which provide opportunities or pose threats as well as strength and
weaknesses to the organization.
Generally environmental influences could be described as
1. Opportunity:
It is a favorable condition in the organizations environment, which enables it to consolidate
and strengthen its position.
2. Threat:
It is an unfavorable condition in the organizations environment, which creates, arises for or
causes damage to the organization.
3. Strength:
It is an inherent capacity, which an organization can use to gain strategic advantage over its
competitors.
4. A weakness:
It is an inherent limitation or constraint, which creates a strategic disadvantage.
Conducting Environmental Analysis
Firms must continually monitor the events and general trends in their environment as well as
the actions and intentions of their competitions. To obtain the information a manager has to
deal with environmental scanning and competitors intelligence.
intelligence. Environmental analysis is
the process by which strategists monitor the environmental factors to determine opportunities
or threats to their firms. It consists of:
1. Identifying threats and opportunities
Scanning activities involve monitoring and evaluating information from the external
environment and disseminating it to key people in the organization. Therefore, manager must
direct their efforts to evaluate those trends that have a significant impact on their pursuit and
future product market activities.
2. Gathering of information about competitors intelligence
A continuous scanning of changes in the external environment enables the mangers to
determine how the firm should be positioned in the long run to exploit new opportunities.
The information about the competitors helps the manager to develop strategies to counteract
their competitors. Firms gather information about competitors such as
new product introduction capacity increase,
cost structure
Executive compensation plan, and
Financial position.
3. Forecasting future direction of environmental changes
After gathering the information of environment and competitors etc, intelligent managers are
able to forecast about future direction of environmental changes. Apart from this, managers
also need to forecast about more specific issues such as
customer preference,
demand for existing products and proposed products availability and
price of input materials and
impact on technological innovation.
Factors to be considered for environmental scanning
The external environment in which an organization exists consists of a variety of factors.
These factors (influences) are events, trends, issues, and expectations of different interested
groups.
Events are important and specific occurrences taking place in different environmental sectors.
Trends are the general tendencies or the courses of action along which events take place.
Issues are the current concerns that arise in response to events and trends.
Expectations are the demands made by interested groups in the light of their concern for
issues.
After the environment scanning process is complete, the strategists are faced with the
question of how to structure the mass of information available to them. The problem
boils down to sifting the information in such a manner that a clear picture emerges of what
opportunities and threats operating in different sectors of the environment face the
organization.
Opportunities and
Societal, political, Industry
Threats
Regulatory Factors Attractiveness
External Factors
Conclusions
about how Identificatio Drafting
Internal n and Strategy
Companys Strategic /external Education of for
Factors Alternatives overall
Situation matters Situation
Internal Key
Shared Values Internal Factors
HarambeeExecutives
Strengths University College
and 62 | P a g e
Culture
and Influences
Weaknesses
Business Policy and Strategic Management 2012/20
The rural society (traditional society) may not be congenial for the development and
growth of modern entrepreneurs. Thus, it can be said that business has to produce that
what actually the society. The overall social climate in which business operates has
broad systemic implications for organizations.
Political and Legal Environment
The political environment consists of factors related to management of public affairs and
their influence on an organization.
Factors/ influences operating in the political environment
Some of the important factors and influences operating in the political environment are:
The political system and its features like
o nature of the political system,
o ideological stands of political parties and
o Centers power.
The political structure,
o its goals and stability.
Political processes like
o operation of the party systems elections,
o funding of elections
o legislation with respect to economic and industrial promotion and regulation.
Political philosophy,
philosophy, governments role in business,
o its policies and interventions in economic and business development.
Politics play an important role in business dealings and strategic planning. In broad sense
o it promotes and control the business actions.
o Stable, honest, efficient and dynamic political system ensures personal security to the
people.
o Firms must cope with government policy regarding economic policy and regulatory
policies, etc.
o Political environment sometimes offers opportunity and sometimes threats to the
organization.
Role of the Government towards business
The role of the government towards business can be understood from the following noted
facts.
Harambee University College 64 | P a g e
Business Policy and Strategic Management 2012/20
Government established laws and regulations for the successful operation of business
Government enforces the laws and provides a system of courts for adjudicating
differences between business firms and government agencies.
Government regulates the circulation of money and credit and protects the integrity of
the birrs by means of which transaction can be affected.
Government provides infrastructure facilities such as transport, power, finance and other
civic amenities for the smooth functioning of business.
Government issues licenses to competent business establishment,
establishment, conducts inspection, and
assures quality products to consumers.
Government uses tariff and quotas to protect business from foreign competition,.
Therefore, business executives
should take into account the working of the political system and public opinion while taking
business decisions because todays public opinion becomes tomorrows legislations.
If the business executives do not learn how to deal with the public opinion,
opinion, the business will
face disaster.
Business cannot be developed without the support and encouragement of the politicians who
make the government, therefore business executives should take keen interest in political
affairs at local state levels.
Business executive should try to anticipate changes in Government policies and political
forces for the successful operation of business.
Economic Environment
The economic environment consists of macro level factors related to the means of production
and distribution of wealth that have an impact on the business of an organization. There is a
close relationship between business and its economic environment.
environment. Business obtains all its
needed input from economic environment and it absorbs the output of business units.
Economic environment is multi-dimensional in nature and refers to all forces which have an
impact on business.
The factors/ forces which make up the total economic environment that have tremendous
impact on business firms are such as:
trends in fiscal policies, credit policies, monetary policies, money supply,
inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate, employment rate,
Balance of payment, budget deficit.
Each of these factors can serve as an opportunity and threat. Some of the important factors
and influences operating in the economic environment are:
The economic stages existing at a given time in a country.
The economic structure adopted, such as a capitalistic, socialistic or mixed economy.
Economic planning,
planning, such as five-year plans, annual budgets etc.
Economic policies such as industrial, monetary and fiscal policies.
Economic indices like national income, distribution of income, rate and growth of GNP, per-
capital income, disposable personal income, rate of savings and investments, value of exports
and import the balance of payments etc.
Infrastructural factors such as financial institutions, banks mode of transportation
communication facilities etc.
Cultural Environment
The term culture includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, laws, custom, values, norm, and
accepted behavior patterns.
According some writers,
culture consists of behavior patterns that number of a society learn through language and
other form of symbolic interaction their customs, habits, beliefs, and values, the common
viewpoints which bind them together as a social entity.
Cultures change gradually,
gradually, packing up new ideas and dropping old ones,
ones, but many of the
cultures of the past have been so persistent and self contained that the impact of such sudden
change has torn them apart, uprooting their people psychologically.
When people with different cultural background promote, mange, organize then they tend to
acquire distinct culture and adjust its methods of operation according to societys values and
changes
culture determines the types of goods and services to be produced, because,
o the type of food people eat,
o the clothes they wear,
o the festivals they celebrate,
o building material they use to construct houses vary farm culture to culture.
culture. Therefore,
business environment should identify these cultural differences and produce such
products and services, which are suitable to a particular culture.
The environmental impacts of conventional technology are relatively well known today. Air
pollution, acid rain, industrial waste disposal, toxic effluent, noise and vibrations, crowding
and congestion are the side effects of urbanization and industrialization. Thus government
and entrepreneurs should come forward with such technology through which they can control
the side effects of technology on business and society.
To succeed an organization must either fit its strategy to the industry environment in which it
operates, or be able to reshape the industry environments to its advantage through its chosen
strategy. Organizations typically fail when their strategy no longer fits the environment in
which they operate. Organizations to avoid the mistakes that some other organizations made,
they must understand the force that drive competition in the industry in which they are
operating. Otherwise they have little hope of either pursuing strategies that fit existing
industry environment or identifying strategies that might reshape the industry environment to
their advantage.
There are models that can assist managers in analyzing the environment. The models provide
a framework that can be used to identify environmental opportunities and treats.
Opportunities arise when environmental trends create the potential for organization to
achieve a competitive advantage.
So that, some essential requirements are needed for success.
Competitive success
requires Fit with existing environment
o competitive environment
Mainly concerned with industry environment.
environment.
Generally, firms compete with other firms in the same industry. Gathering industry
information and understanding competitive dynamics among the different organizations in
the industry is vital to successful strategic management. An industry can be defined as a
group of organizations offering products or services that are close substitutes for each other.
An industry
industry is composed of:
a set of firms that offer similar products or services,
services,
provide to similar customers,
customers, and
Use similar methods of operation.
operation.
Industry is defined as a group of business whose products are close substitutes. But this
definition can be inadequate because some organizations and industries produce goods and
services and concerned with supply of products side economic system. Close substitutes are
products or services that satisfy the same basic consumer needs . For example,
example, the metal and
plastic body panels used in automobile construction is close substitutes for each other. They
are serving the same consumer need. The task facing managers is to analyze competitive
forces in an industry environment in order to identify the opportunities and threats
confronting an organization.
A market:
market:
Consists of a group of customers with specific set of requirement, which may be
satisfied by one or more products.
Analysis of market will give an understanding about the customers requirements, the
products which satisfy their requirements, the organization producing the product and the
means by which customers obtain those products (distribution channels).
Why analysis of industry and market is necessary? (Competitive
environment)
The analysis of industry and market (competitive environment) is necessary for the following
reasons.
To identify other industries core competencies.
To understand the nature of customers and their need,
Suppliers
Bargaining power of suppliers
Industry
competito
Potential entrants Substitutes
Threat of new entrants rs Threat of substitute products
Rivalry among
established firms
Buyers
Bargaining power of buyers
On the other hand, if the risk of new entry is low, established organizations could take
advantage of this opportunity to raise prices and earn greater returns. The strength of the
competitive forces of potential rivals is largely a function of the height of barriers to entry.
The concept of barriers to entry implies that there are significant costs in joining an industry.
The greater the costs that potential competitors must bear, the greater are the barriers to
entry. High entry barriers keep potential competitors out of an industry even when industry
returns are high. The principal sources of barriers to entry are:
Economies of scale
Absolute cost advantage
Brand loyalty and switching cost
Capital requirement
Product differentiation
Access to distribution channels
Government and legal barriers
Retaliation by established producers
When this risk is low,
low, established organizations can charge higher prices and earn greater
profits than would have been possible otherwise clearly, then, it is the interest of
organizations to pursue strategies consistent with these aims. Indeed, empirical evidence
suggests that the height of barriers to entry is the most important determinant of success rates
in an industry.
The threat of substitute products
Here, the products of industries that serves similar consumer needs as those of the industry
being analyzed. A substitute may be regarded as something, which meets the same needs as
the product in any industry.
industry. The extent of threat from particular substitute depends on two
factors.
factors.
The extent to which price and performance of this substitute can match industries
product. If the price and performance of existing product rise above that of the
substitute product, customer tends to switch to the substitute.
The willingness of buyers to switch to the substitute. Buyer will be more willing to
change substitute if switching costs are low.
low.
For example:
Organization in the coffee industry competes indirectly with those in the tea and soft-
drink industries. (All three industries serve consumer needs for drinks).
The extent to which substitutes limit price and profit depends on:
The buyers propensity to substitute
Relative price and performance of substitutes
Alternatively, weak buyers give an organization the opportunity to raise prices and earn
greater returns. An industrys buyers tend to be powerful relative to the firms if they are
buying from when the conditions listed below apply (these factors also apply to a group of
consumers and to industrial and commercial buyers):
buyers):
Buyers are concentrated as in cooperatives, or they account for a large volume of
purchases.
Products are undifferentiated or standardized.
standardized.
The sellers component represents a large portion of the total cost of the buyers
finished product.
product. When the sellers product has a small cost share, buyers tend to be
less prices sensitive.
Buyers are earning low profits and are thus more price sensitive than if they were
highly profitable.
The sellers product is not critical in one way or another to the buyer. If it is critical to the
quality, price, appeal,
appeal, etc,, of an industrial buyer groups finished product, for example,
then the sellers will have power over the buyers.
There is a threat that buyers can integrate backward to make the suppliers product.
Alternatively, week supplies give a company the opportunity to force down prices and
demand higher quality. The power of suppliers is high in the following situations:
There are few suppliers who are more concentrated than their customers
Suppliers product is differentiated
Customers switching costs are high
There is little pressure on suppliers to protect themselves from substitutes or
replacements for their product
When suppliers have the capability to integrate forward.
forward.
High exit barriers causing firms to bear low or negative returns on investment
Wide spectrum of strategies and types of firms which generates confusion and frequent
collision in the market. The opposite case might be an oligopoly like the
automobile industry where most actions are reactions to another competitor and rivalry
is somewhat orderly, albeit intense.
Intense rivalry among established organizations constitutes a strong threat to success.
success. And it
is largely a function of three factors.
factors.
Industry competitive structure
Demand conditions and
The height of exit barriers in the industry
Competitive structure
Competitive structure refers to the number and size distribution of organizations in an
industry. Different competitive structures have different implications for rivalry. Structures
vary from fragmented up to consolidated.
Fragmented Consolidated
One firm or one dominant firm (Monopoly)
Many firms no dominant firms
Few firms
Shared dominance
(Oligopoly)
Declining demand results in more competition as organization fight to maintain revenues and
market-share. Demand declines when consumers are leaving the market place or when each
consumer is buying less. When demand is declining, an organization can attain growth only
by taking market share away from other organization. Thus, declining demand constitutes a
major threat, for it increase the extent of rivalry between established organizations.
Exit barrier
Exit barrier are a serious competitive threat when industry demand is declining. They are
economic, strategic, and emotional factors that keep organization competing in an industry
even when returns are low. If exit barriers are high,
high, organization can become locked into an
unfavorable industry and excess productive capacity can result. In turn, excess capacity
tends to lead to intensified price competition,
competition, with organizations cutting prices in an attempt
to obtain the orders needed to utilize their idle capacity. Common exit barriers include the
following:
Investments in plant and equipment that have no alternative uses and cannot be sold off.
If the organization wishes to leave the industry, it has to write off the book value of these
assets.
High fixed costs of exit,
exit, such as severance pay to workers who are being made redundant.
Emotional attachments to an industry,
industry, as when an organization is unwilling to exit from
its original industry for sentimental reasons.
Strategic relationship between business units.
units. For example, within a multi-industry
organization, a low-return unit may provide vital inputs from a high return unit based in
another industry. Thus the organization may be unwilling to exit from the low-return
units.
Economic dependence on the industry,
industry, as when an organization is not diversified and so
relies on the industry for its income.
Demand Conditions
Demand decline
Demand growth
When demand growth is high, the environment of consolidated industry may be favorable.
When demand is declining and exit barriers are high, the probable emergency of excess
capacity is likely to causes to price wars. Thus, depending on the interaction between these
various factors,
factors, the extent of rivalry among established organization in a consolidated
industry might constitute an opportunity or a threat.
external environment. It is the sum total of resources and behavior, strength and weaknesses,
synergistic effects occurring in, and the distinctive competence of any organization.
Organizational capability is measured and compared through the process of organizational
appraisal.
appraisal.
Organizational
Capabilities
RESOURCES
Appropriability
Sustainability and Appropriability
Sustainable Competitive Advantage is the result of
Durability: Some resources are more durable than others and, hence, they are a more secure
basis for competitive advantage. The increasing pace of technological change is shortening
the useful life-span of most capital assets.
Transferability (Mobility): The simplest means of acquiring the resources and capabilities
necessary for imitating another firms strategy is to buy them. If rivals can acquire on
similar resources for imitating the strategy of a successful company, then that companys
competitive advantage will be short lived. The ability to buy a resource or capability depends
on its transferability the extent to which it is mobile between and among companies.
Replicability: If a firm cannot buy a resource or capability, then it must build it.
Appropriability: The returns generated from a resource (Grant). Grant uses three categories
to explain this: property rights, relative bargaining power and embeddedness of the resource
Effective internal analysis provides a clearer understanding of how an organization can
compete through its resources. Resources are a source of competitive advantage.
advantage. Because:
Resource is instrumental for creating customer value,
value, if it increases the benefits
customer derive from a product or service relative to the costs they incur (earn, acquire),
then the resources can lead to competitive advantage.
Resources are a source of advantages
if they are rare and note equally available to all competitors.
competitors.
For every extremely valuable resource,
resource, if all competitors have equal access; the
resources cannot provide a source of competitive advantage.
Resources can enhance a firms competitive advantage.
advantage.
as strategies are changed and organizations are restructured
When they are well organized,
organized, many firms layoff long-time employees and lose as
well their potentially valuable skills.
1. Corporate Success
2. A competitive advantage.
Corporate Success
3. Distinctive capabilities and
strategic assets.
4. Relationships
Harambee University College 83 | P a g e
Business Policy and Strategic Management 2012/20
Architecture: Architecture is the term used to describe relationships, both formal and
informal, between internal staff, with customers and suppliers, and inter firm collaborative
arrangements (networks).
Reputation: Reputation is built on relationships with an organizations suppliers and
customers. A particular reputation, perhaps for reliability or speed of service, is a source of
advantage where the buyer values this reputation. Reputations are, however, a wasting source
of advantage if they are not maintained.
Innovation: Innovation can be a source of competitive advantage when it provides means for
an organization to compete more efficiently, offering a product which is more valuable to the
customer; or when it allows the organization to compete in new ways.
The software of the organization that assessed in relation to the prevailing conditions of the
organization is:
Staff. The assessment to prove whether the organization is having adequate manpower with
necessary requirements. Also assesses the assignment of the right person to the right job.
Harambee University College 84 | P a g e
Business Policy and Strategic Management 2012/20
Skill. To checks whether the employees have the necessary skills needed to carry out the
organizations strategy and achieve organizational goals.
Shared values. The assessment to prove whether the employees share the same guiding
values in the organization.
Style. The assessment to identify whether the organizations employees stare a common
way of thinking and behavior.
SWOT analysis
The other most basic technique for the analysis of the firm and industry conditions is SWOT
analysis. SWOT analysis provides a framework for analyzing the four elements of an
organizations internal and external environment.
Opportunities and threats
strengths and weaknesses
SWOT analysis provides inputs a basic listing of conditions both inside and surrounding
an organization. It helps executives summarize the major facts and forecasts derived from the
external and internal analysis. From this, executives can derive a series of statements that
identify the primary and secondary strategic issues confronting the organization. The
strengths and weaknesses portion of SWOT refers to the internal conditions of a firm where
the firm excels (shows strength) and where it may be lacking relative to similar competitors
(shows weaknesses).
3. Enumerate (name, list, specify, itemize) the critical operational factors of each
functional area.
4. Identify both qualitative and quantitative variables to describe performance of the
SBU on each operational factor.
factor.
5. Conduct research to assign either qualitative or quantitative values to the variables
identified in (4).
6. Organize findings by function according to whether they represent strengths or
weaknesses.
Conducting an internal analysis of the R&D function involves identifying strengths and
weaknesses in R&D activities such as the following:
Demand for R&D
Is demand for R&D services stable?
Is R&D funding stable?
Is R&D funding vulnerable to profit variations?
Facilities and equipment
Are facilities and equipment state-of-art?
Is obsolete equipment expendable?
Is space a problem?
Market and production inputs
Does market information get fed into the R&D process?
Does production information influence the R&D process?
Are marketing and production influences balanced?
Planning and scheduling
Are jobs planned and scheduled?
Are costs effectively monitored?
Are human resource needs planned?
Is the level of uncertainty associated with the type of R&D activity in which the
organization is involved appropriate for the intended level of risk?
Some of the criteria that can be used to analyzed organization structure are as follows:
Present Strategies
Whether present strategies are stated explicitly, must be inferred from behavior of the
organization, the goals and action plans currently applicable must be identified and analyzed.
The idea is to determine which strategies are working (that is, which action plans are being
implemented in such a way that their associated goals are being met) and which ones are not.
Information about the relative success of current strategy can then be fed into the process of
formulating and implementing new strategies. In this way problems associated with existing
strategies can be corrected by formulating modifications or replacements for them and
effective strategies can be improved upon, retained as is, or extended so that strategic success
is facilitated. The following steps can be followed to evaluate current strategy at any of the
levels of strategy:
Select strategy levels for analysis.
Identify present goals and action plans at each level.
Determine extent to which short and long-term goals have or have not been met.
Determine which action plans have and have not been effective.
Of course, a strategy successfully carried out constitutes a positive attribute of the firm, and
unsuccessfully implemented one is a problem to be dealt with. For an internal analysis,
however, the point is to identify strategies that are particularly effective - they become
strength. Weaknesses are strategies that have been especially unsuccessful in their operation.
Competitive advantages
A winning business strategy is grounded in sustainable competitive advantages. A company
has competitive advantage whenever it has an edge over rivals in
attracting customers and
Defending against competitive forces.
There are many sources of competitive advantage:
advantage:
having the best made product on the market,
delivering superior customer service,
achieving lower cost, than rivals,
being in a more convenient geographic location,
proprietary technology,
features and styles with more buyer appeal,
a well-known brand name and reputation,
shorter lead time in testing and developing new product,
providing more value for customers for their money and
Combinations of two or more of these advantages.
CHAPTER
5. Strategy Formulation: Options and Choices
Brief contents:
5.1. Levels of Strategy / The strategy hierarchy
Developing a strategic vision and mission, establishing objectives, and deciding on a strategy
are basic direction setting tasks. They map out where the organization is moving. All the
three together constitutes strategic plan. Strategy formulation is often referred to as strategic
planning of long-range planning and it is concerned with developing an organization mission,
objectives, strategies, and policies. It is useful to consider strategy formulation as part of a
strategic management process that comprises three phases:
Diagnosis,
formulation, and
Implementation.
Formulation, the second phase in the strategic management process, produces a clear set of
recommendations, with supporting justification, that revise as necessary the mission and
objectives of the organization, and supply the strategies for accomplishing them.
There are four primary steps in this phase:
Reviewing the current key objectives and strategies of the organization, which usually
would have been identified and evaluated as part of the diagnosis
Identifying a rich range of strategic alternatives to address the three levels of strategy
formulation.
Doing a balanced evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of the alternatives relative
to their feasibility plus expected effects on the issues and contributions to the success
of the organization
Deciding on the alternatives that should be implemented or recommended.
In most (large) corporations there are several levels of management. Each level (of strategy)
involves different strategic decisions. Strategic management is the conduct/ way of drafting,
implementing and evaluating cross-functional decisions that will enable an organization to
achieve its long-term objectives. Strategic management is the process of
specifying the organization's mission, vision and objectives,
developing policies and plans, often in terms of projects and programs, which are
designed to achieve these objectives, and then
Allocating resources to implement the policies and plans, projects and programs.
It provides overall direction to the enterprise. It gives direction to corporate values,
corporate culture, corporate goals, and corporate missions.
There is wide diversity in the strategic management literatures attached to the different levels
of strategy that may exist in a firm. Strategy can be formulated on different levels.
Thompson and Strickland propose four levels:
o corporate strategy,
o business strategy,
o functional area support strategy, and
o Operating-level strategy.
Each layer provides strategic guidance of the next level of subordinate managers.
Two-way Influence
A Diversified Company
Under this broad corporate strategy there are typically business-level competitive strategies
and functional unit strategies.
At the business unit level, the strategic issues are less about the coordination of operating
units and more about developing and sustaining a competitive advantage for the goods and
services that are produced. At the business level, the strategy formulation phase deals with:
positioning the business against rivals
anticipating changes in demand and technologies and adjusting the strategy to
accommodate them and
Before using one of the two generic competitive strategies (lower cost or differentiation), the
firm or unit must choose
the range of product varieties it will produce,
the distribution channels it will employ,
the types of buyers it will serve,
company or business unit a defense against rivals. Cost leadership is appealing to a broad
cross-section of the market by providing products or services at the lowest price. It requires
being the overall low-cost provider of the products or services. Implementing this strategy
successfully requires continual, exceptional efforts to reduce costs without excluding product
features and services that buyers consider essential. Some conditions that tend to make this
strategy an attractive choice are:
The industry's product is much the same from seller to seller
The marketplace is dominated by price competition, with highly price-sensitive buyers
There are few ways to achieve product differentiation that have much value to buyers
Most buyers use product in the same ways
Switching costs for buyers are low
Buyers are large and have significant bargaining power
Product/service
Product/ design or brand superior technology,
quality, image, prestige, or
special features, dealer network, Convenience.
after-sale service,
service, customer services,
Sustainable differentiation usually comes from advantages in core competencies, unique
company resources or capabilities, and superior management of value chain activities.
3. Cost focus
In using cost focus, the company or business unit seeks a cost advantage in its target segment.
The cost focus strategy is Price focus strategy and a market niche strategy, concentrating on a
narrow customer segment and competing with lowest prices, requires/ having lower cost
structure than competitors.
Cost focus strategy is a lower-cost competitive strategy that focuses on a particular buyer group
or geographic market and attempts to serve only this niche, to the exclusion of others. It focuses
its efforts better able to serve its narrow strategic target more efficiently than can its competitors
as well as requires a trade-off between profitability and overall market share.
4. Differentiation focus
Differentiation strategy is a second market niche strategy, concentrating on a narrow customer
segment and competing through differentiating features. It is that concentrates on a particular
buyer group, product line segment, or geographic market. In using differentiation focus, the
company or business unit seeks differentiation in a targeted market segment. This strategy is
valued by those who believe that a company or a unit that focuses its efforts is better able to
serve the special needs of a narrow strategic target more effectively than can its competition.
Some conditions that tend to favor focus, i.e. price or differentiation focus are:
The business is new and/or has modest resources
The company lacks the capability to go after a wider part of the total market
Buyers' needs or uses of the item are diverse; there are many different niches and
segments in the industry
Buyer segments differ widely in size, growth rate, profitability, and intensity in the five
competitive forces, making some segments more attractive than others
Industry leaders don't see the niche as crucial to their own success
Few or no other rivals are attempting to specialize in the same target segment
This strategy could be attractive in markets that have both variety in buyer needs that make
differentiation common and where large numbers of buyers are sensitive to both price and value.
Porter argues that this strategy is often temporary, and that a business should choose and achieve
one of the four generic competitive strategies. Otherwise, the business is stuck in the middle of
the competitive marketplace and will be out-performed by competitors who choose and excel in
one of the fundamental strategies. His argument is analogous to the threats to a tennis player
who is standing at the service line, rather than near the baseline or getting to the net.
Competitive Tactics
In general, tactics are shorter in time horizon and narrower in scope than strategies. Among the
various tactics that may be useful and dealt in this section are:
competitive tactics, and
Cooperative tactics.
Two categories of competitive tactics are those dealing with
timing (when to enter a market) and
Market location (where and how to enter and/or defend).
Timing Tactics:
When to make a strategic move is often as important as what move to make. We often speak of
first-movers - the first to provide a product or service; second-movers or rapid followers, and late
movers - wait-and-see
These fall conveniently into offensive and defensive tactics. Offensive tactics are designed to
take market share from a competitor, while defensive tactics attempt to keep a competitor from
taking away some of our present market share, under the onslaught of offensive tactics by the
competitor. Some offensive tactics are:
Frontal assault Bypass attack
Flanking maneuver Guerrilla warfare
Encirclement
Some defensive tactics are:
Raise structural barriers:
Increase expected retaliation:
Reduce inducement for attacks:
They are particularly necessary and potentially useful when a company wishes to enter a new
industry, new markets, and new parts of the world. Acquisitions involve buying an existing
business; internal new ventures involve starting a new business from scratch; and joint ventures
typically involve starting a new business from scratch with the assistance of a partner.
Stability Strategies
There are a number of circumstances in which the most appropriate growth stance for a company
is stability, rather than growth. An organization may choose stability over growth by continuing
its current activities without any significant change in direction. The stability strategies can be
appropriate for a successful corporation operating in a reasonably predictable environment. They
are very useful in the short run but can be dangerous if followed for too long. They may be used
for a relatively short period, after which further growth is planned. And they usually involve
with circumstances that either permit a period of comfortable coasting or suggest a pause or
caution. Some of the more popular of these strategies are:
the pause strategy,
strategy,
the no change strategy,
strategy, and
the profit strategy.
strategy.
1. Pause strategy
A pause strategy also called pause and then proceed or a timeout. It is an opportunity to rest
before continuing a growth or retrenchment strategy. It is typically a temporary strategy to be
used until the environment becomes more hospitable or to enable an organization to consolidate
its resources after prolonged rapid growth.
2. No change strategy
A no change strategy is a decision to do nothing new, a choice to continue current operations and
policies for the foreseeable future. Rarely articulated as a definite strategy, a no-change
strategys success depends on a lack of significant change in an organization situation.
3. Profit strategy
A profit strategy is grab profits while you can. It is a decision to do nothing new in a worsening
situation, but instead to act as though the organizations problems are only temporary. It is an
attempt to artificially support profits when a companys sales are declining by reducing
investment and short term discretionary (optional, flexible) expenditure. It is a non-
recommended strategy
Retrenchment strategies/ Exit strategy
Retrenchment Strategies
Management may pursue retrenchment strategies when the company has a weak competitive
position in some or all of its product lines resulting in poor performance, that is when sales are
down and profits are becoming losses. These strategies generate a great deal of pressure to
improve performance.
Restructuring
So far we have focused on strategies for expanding the scope of a company into new business
areas. We turn now to their opposite. i.e. strategies for reducing the scope of the company by
exiting from business areas.
In recent years reducing the scope of a company through restructuring has become an
increasingly popular strategy, particularly among the companies that diversified their activities.
In most cases, organizations that are engaged in restructuring are divesting themselves of
diversified activities in order to concentrate on their core businesses. The first question that must
be asked is
Why are so many companies restructuring at this particular time?
Exit strategies
Organizations adopt/ employ different strategies for exiting from business areas and various
turnaround strategies to revitalize (refresh, revive) their core business area.
The three main strategies for exiting business areas are
divestment,
Independent investor
harvest, and Divestm (spin-off)
Another
liquidation ent
organization
Exit Business unit
Harve management (MBO)
Strategies
st
Liquidat
ion
Exit strategy
Divestment
Of the three main strategies, divestment is usually the favored one. It represents the best way for
a company to recoup as much of its initial investment in business unit as possible. The idea is to
sell the business unit to the highest bidder.
Harvest and Liquidation:
A harvest or liquidation strategy is generally considered inferior to a divestment strategy since
the company can probably best recoup its investment in a business unit by divestment. A harvest
strategy involves halting investment in a unit in order to maximize short to medium-term cash
flow from that unit before liquidating it. A liquidation strategy is the least attractive of all to
pursue since it requires the organization to write off its investment in a business unit, often at a
considerable cost.
Turnaround:
This strategy, dealing with a company in serious trouble, attempts to resuscitate (save) or revive
the company through a combination of contraction (general, major cutbacks in size and costs)
and consolidation (creating and stabilizing a smaller, leaner company). Although difficult, when
done very effectively it can succeed in both retaining enough key employees and revitalizing the
company.
Captive company strategy
This strategy involves giving up independence in exchange for some security by becoming
another company's sole supplier, distributor, or a dependent subsidiary.
Sell out
If a company in a weak position is unable or unlikely to succeed with a turnaround or captive
company strategy, it has few choices other than to try to find a buyer and sell itself (or divest, if
part of a diversified corporation).
2. Portfolio Strategies
Strategic planning is the process of developing and maintaining a strategy fit between
organizations goals & capabilities and its changing marketing opportunities. And the steps are
Defining the company mission
Setting companys objectives and goals
Designing the Business Portfolio
Developing business unit strategy
Designing functional plans
Designing the Business Portfolio
Based on the companys mission statement and objectives, managers must plan its business
portfolio. Business portfolio is the collection of businesses and products that make up the
company or the company comprises. It is best if it fits the companys strengths and weakness to
opportunities in the environment. Companies must analyze their business portfolio
& decide which business should receive more, less, or no investment, and
develop growth strategies for adding new products or businesses to the
portfolio.
One of the most popular aids to developing corporate strategy in Multi Business Corporation is
portfolio analysis. Portfolio analysis is a tool that management uses to identify & evaluate the
various businesses that make up the company. In portfolio analysis, top management views its
product lines and business units as a series of investments from which it expects a profitable
return; and the product lines/ business units form a portfolio of investments that top management
must constantly juggle (organize, manage, fit in) to ensure the best return on the corporations
invested money.
What should be our portfolio strategy?
This second component of corporate level strategy is concerned with making decisions about the
portfolio of lines of business (LOB's) or strategic business units (SBU's), not the company's
portfolio of individual products.
The best test of the business portfolio's overall attractiveness is whether the combined growth
and profitability of the businesses in the portfolio will allow the company to attain its
performance objectives. Questions related to this overall criterion are such as:
Does the portfolio contain enough businesses in attractive industries?
Does it contain too many marginal businesses or question marks?
Is the proportion of mature/ declining businesses so great that growth will be sluggish?
Are there some businesses that are not really needed or should be divested?
Does the company have its share of industry leaders, or is it burdened with too many
businesses in modest competitive positions?
Is the portfolio of SBU's and its relative risk/ growth potential consistent with the strategic
goals?
Do the core businesses generate dependable profits and/ or cash flow?
Are there enough cash-producing businesses to finance those needing cash
Is the portfolio overly vulnerable to seasonal or recessionary influences?
Does the portfolio put the corporation in good position for the future?
It is important to consider diversification versus concentration while working on portfolio
strategy. However, having a single business puts "all the eggs in one basket," which is dangerous
when the industry and/or technology may change. Strategic management within multi-business
companies has been closely associated with the development and application of portfolio
planning models, and more recently with the application of shareholder value models to
restructuring strategies.
Portfolio Planning Models
Portfolio matrix models can be useful in reexamining a company's present portfolio. The
purpose of all portfolio matrix models is to help a company understand and consider changes in
its portfolio of businesses, and also to think about allocation of resources among the different
business elements. The primary models are
the BCG Growth-Share Matrix and
the GE Business Screen
These models consider and display on a two-dimensional graph each major SBU in terms of
some measure of its industry attractiveness and its relative competitive strength.
Low
Buil
s
Mediu Hol
d
High Harves
t
3. Parenting Strategies
This third component of corporate level strategy, relevant for a multi-business company (it is not
for a single-business company), parenting strategy. It is concerned with how to allocate resources
and manage capabilities and activities across the portfolio of businesses.
Corporate Parenting, in contrast to portfolio analysis, views the corporation in terms of resources
and capabilities that can be used to build business unit value as well as generate synergies cross
business units. The best parent companies create more value than any of their rivals would if
they owned the same business. And have what we call parenting advantage.Corporate
parenting generates corporate strategy by focusing on the core competencies of the parent
corporation and on the value created from the relationship between the parent and its business.
As noted earlier, the four factors which build competitive advantage are efficiency, quality,
innovation and customer responsiveness. They are the generic building blocks of competitive
advantage. These factors are generic in the sense that they represent four basic ways of lowering
costs and achieving differentiation that any company can adopt, regardless of its industry or the
products or services it produces; and all highly interrelated. Thus, for example, superior quality
can lead to superior efficiency, while innovation can enhance efficiency, quality, and customer
responsiveness.
CHAPTER
6. Implementing Strategies (Strategies in Action)
Brief contents:
6.1. The nature of strategy implementation
6.2. Strategy Implementation issues
6.3. Approaches to strategy implementation
Chapter Six: Implementing Strategies (Strategies in Action)
6.1. The nature of strategy implementation
Successful strategy formulation doesnt guarantee successful strategy implementation!
Successful strategy formulation doesnt guarantee successful strategy implementation.
Steps to strategic management
Environmental analysis
Establish organizational direction
Strategy formulation
Strategy implementation
Strategic control
Strategy formulation Versus Strategy implementation
Strategy Formulation: easier to say going to do it
Strategy Implementation: more difficult to do something
Strategy Formulation Strategy Implementation
Positioning forces before the action Managing forces during the action
Focuses on effectiveness Focuses on efficiency
Primarily an intellectual process Primarily an operational process
Requires good intuitive and Requires motivation and leadership
analytical skills skills
Requires coordination among a few Requires coordination among
individuals many persons
Strategy implementation
Once the strategies have been formulated, then the task remains of implementing those
strategies. Strategy implementation
means change.
Shift in responsibility from strategists to divisional and functional managers
varies among different types and sizes of an organization.
Successful implementation requires:
Support Motivation
Discipline Hard work
CHAPTER
Brief contents
Specific Objectives:
Define the term control,
List the purposes of managerial control,
Identify and elaborate the three approaches of controlling,
Able to list and explicitly discuss the type of managerial controlling
Strategic control simply means monitoring the strategic management process, comparing its
performance to specified standards, and then taking action where needed to ensure that the
planned events outlined in the strategic formulation process actually occur.
market control,
bureaucratic control, and
Clan control.
7.4.1. Market control
it involves the use of price competition to evaluate output.
Managers compare profits and prices to determine the efficiency of their organization.
In order to use market control,
o there must be a reasonable level of competition in the goods or service area and
o it must be possible to specify requirements clearly.
Market control is not appropriate in controlling functional departments, unless;
the price for services is set through competition and
Its representative of the true value of provided services.
7.4.2. Bureaucratic control
Is the use of rules, policies, hierarchy of authority, written documentation, reward systems,
and other formal mechanisms to influence employee behavior and assess performance.
Can be used when behavior can be controlled with market or price mechanisms.
7.4.3. Clan control
Represents cultural values almost the opposite of bureaucratic control.
Relies on values, beliefs, corporate culture, shared norms, and informal relationships to
regulate employee behaviors and facilitate the reaching of organizational goals.
Organizations that use clan control require trust among their employees. Given minimal
direction and standards, employees are assumed to perform well - indeed, they participate in
setting standards and designing the control systems.
7.5. Types of Control
Management can implement controls before an activity commences, while the activity is going
on, or after the activity has been completed. The types of organizational control are:
feed forward,
concurrent, and
feedback
strategic control,
management control, and
Operational control.
7.5.1. Feed forward Control
Is sometimes called preliminary control, pre-control, preventive control, or steering control.
Focuses on the regulation of inputs (human, material, and financial resources that flow into
the organization) to ensure that they meet the standards necessary for the transformation
process.
Are desirable because they allow management to prevent problems rather than having to cure
them later.
Require timely and accurate information that is often difficult to develop.
However, some authors use term "steering control" as separate types of control. This types of
controls are designed to detect deviation some standard or goal to allow correction to be made
before a particular sequence of actions is completed.
7.5.2. Concurrent Control
sometimes is called screening or yes-no control, because it often involves checkpoints at
which determinations are made about whether to continue progress, take corrective action, or
stop work altogether on products or services.
Takes place while an activity is in progress.
Involves the regulation of ongoing activities that are part of transformation process to ensure
that they conform to organizational standards.
Is designed to ensure that employee work activities produce the correct results.
Since concurrent control involves regulating ongoing tasks, it requires a thorough
understanding of the specific tasks involved and their relationship to the desired and product.
7.5.3. Feedback Control
Focuses on the outputs of the organization after transformation is complete.
Sometimes called post action or output control, fulfils a number of important functions.
For one thing, it is often used when feed forward and concurrent controls are not feasible or
are too costly.
Sometimes, feedback is the only viable type of control available.
has advantages over feed-forward and concurrent control.
o It provides managers with meaningful information on how effective its planning effort was.
If feedback indicates little variance between standard and actual performance, this is evidence
that planning was generally on target.
If the deviation is great, a manager can use this information when formulating new plans to
make them more effective. Second, feedback control can enhance employees motivation.
The major drawback of this type of control is that,
The time the manager has the information and if there is significant problem the damage is
already done. But for many activities, feedback control fulfills number important functions.
Multiple Controls
Feed-forward, concurrent, and feedback control methods are not mutually exclusive. Rather, they
are usually combined into a multiple control systems. Managers design control systems to define
standards of performance and acquire information feedback at strategic control points. Strategic
control points are those activities that are especially important for achieving strategic objectives.
When organizations do not have multiple control systems that focus on strategic control points,
they often can experience difficulties that cause managers to reevaluate their control processes.
7.5.4. Strategic Control
Strategic control, the process of evaluating strategy, is practiced both after the strategy is
formulated and after it is implemented. Strategic control is concerned with
tracking the strategy as it is being implemented,
detecting any problems areas or potential problem areas, and
Making any necessary adjustments.
Newman and Logan use the term "steering control" to highlight some important characteristics
of strategic control. Ordinarily, a significant time span occurs between initial implementation of
a strategy and achievement of its intended results. During that time, numerous projects are
undertaken, investments are made, and actions are undertaken to implement the new strategy.
Also the environmental situation and the firm's internal situation are developing and evolving.
Strategic controls are necessary to steer the firm through these events. They must provide some
means of correcting the directions on the basis of intermediate performance and new
information.
The importance of strategic control
Henry Mintzberg,
o one of the foremost theorists in the area of strategic management,
o Tells us that no matter how well the organization plans its strategy, a different strategy
may emerge.
o Starting with the intended or planned strategies, he related the five types of strategies in
the following manner:
Intended strategy Unrealized strategy
Deliberate strategy Emergent strategy
Realized strategy
Recognizing the number of different ways that intended and realized strategies may differ
underscores the importance of evaluation and control systems so that the firm can monitor its
performance and take corrective action if the actual performance differs from the intended
strategies and planned results.
7.5.5. Management Control
Where management control is imposed, it functions within the framework established by the
strategy. Normally these objectives (standards) are established for major subsystems within the
organization, such as SBUs, projects, products, functions, and responsibility centers.
Management control focuses on the accomplishment of:
o the objectives of the various sub-strategies comprising the master strategy and
o the objectives of the intermediate plans
o For example, "are quality control objectives being met?"
Typical management control measures include:
o ROI, residual income, cost, product quality, and so on.
o These control measures are essentially summations of operational control measures.
o Corrective action may involve very minor or very major changes in the strategy.
7.5.6. Operating Control
Operational control systems:
o are designed to ensure that day-to-day actions
o Are consistent with established plans and objectives.
o Focuses on events in a recent period.
o Are derived from the requirements of the management control system.
Operational control is concerned individual and group performance as compared with the
individual and group role prescriptions required by organizational plans. For example, "are
individual sales quotes being met?"
Each of these types of control is not a separate and distinct entity and, in fact, may be
indistinguishable from others. Moreover, similar measurement techniques may be used for each
type of control. Corrective action is taken where performance does not meet standards. This
action may involve
o training, o leadership, o Termination.
o motivation, o discipline, or
Recent conceptual contributors to the strategic control literature have argued for anticipatory feed
forward controls that recognize a rapidly changing and uncertain external environment.
Schreyogg and Steinmann (1987) have made a preliminary effort, in developing new system to
operate on a continuous basis, checking and critically evaluating assumptions, strategies and
results. They refer to strategic control as: "The critical evaluation of plans, activities, and results,
thereby providing information for the future action". Schreyogg and Steinmann proposed an
alternative to the classical feedback model of control: a 3-step model of strategic control which
includes:
o premise control,
o implementation control, and
o Strategic surveillance.
Premises Control
Planning premises/assumptions are established early on in the strategic planning process and act
as a basis for formulating strategies. "Premise control has been designed to check systematically
and continuously whether or not the premises set during the planning and implementation
process are still valid. It involves the checking of environmental conditions. Premises are
primarily concerned with two types of factors:
Environmental factors (for example, inflation, technology, interest rates, regulation, and
demographic/social changes).
Industry factors (for example, competitors, suppliers, substitutes, and barriers to entry).
All premises may not require the same amount of control. Therefore, managers must select
those premises and variables that
are likely to change and
would a major impact on the company and its strategy if they did.
Implementation Control
Strategic implantation control provides an additional source of feed-forward information.
"Implementation control is designed to assess whether the overall strategy should be changed in
light of unfolding events and results associated with incremental steps and actions that
implement the overall strategy." Strategic implementation control does not replace operational
control. Unlike operations control, strategic implementation control continuously questions the
basic direction of the strategy. The two basic types of implementation control are:
1. Monitoring strategic thrusts (new or key strategic programs). Two approaches are useful in
enacting implementation controls focused on monitoring strategic thrusts:
a. one way is to agree early in the planning process on which thrusts are critical factors in the
success of the strategy or of that thrust;
b. the second approach is to use stop/go assessments linked to a series of meaningful
thresholds (time, costs, research and development, success, etc.) associated with particular
thrusts.
2. Milestone Reviews
Milestones are significant points in the development of a program, such as points where large
commitments of resources must be made.
A milestone review usually involves a full-scale reassessment of the strategy and the
advisability of continuing or refocusing the direction of the company.
In order to control the current strategy, must be provided in strategic plans.
Strategic Surveillance
Compared to premise control and implementation control, strategic surveillance is designed to be
a relatively unfocused, open, and broad search activity. "strategic surveillance is designed to
monitor a broad range of events inside and outside the company that are likely to threaten the
course of the firm's strategy." The basic idea behind strategic surveillance is that some form of
general monitoring of multiple information sources should be encouraged, with the specific
intent being the opportunity to uncover important yet unanticipated information. Strategic
surveillance appears to be similar in some way to "environmental scanning." The rationale,
however, is different. Environmental, scanning usually is seen as part of the chronological
planning cycle devoted to generating information for the new plan. By way of contrast, strategic
surveillance is designed to safeguard the established strategy on a continuous basis.
Special Alert Control
Another type of strategic control is a special alert control.
A special alert control is the need to thoroughly, and often rapidly, reconsider the firm's basis
strategy based on a sudden, unexpected event." The analysts of recent corporate history are full
of such potentially high impact surprises (i.e., natural disasters, chemical spills, plane crashes,
product defects, hostile takeovers etc.). While Pearce and Robinson suggested that:
special alert control be performed only during strategy implementation,
Preble recommends that because special alert controls are really a subset of strategic
surveillance that they be conducted throughout the entire strategic management process.
The characteristics of each control component are including
the component's purpose, degree of focusing,
mechanism used to implement it, information sources, and
the procedure to be followed, organizational/personnel to be utilized.
7.6. Differences between Strategic and Operational Control
The differences between strategic and operational control are highlighted by reference to a
general definition of management control: Management control is the set of measurement,
analysis, and action decisions required for the timely management of the continuing operation of
a process. This section discusses in the terms of.
Measurement:
Strategic control requires data from more sources.
Strategic control requires more data from external sources.
Strategic control is oriented to the future.
Strategic control is more concerned with measuring the accuracy of the decision premise.
Strategic control standards are based on external factors.
Strategic control relies on variable reporting interval.
Analysis:
Strategic control models are less precise.
Strategic control models are less formal.
The principal variables in a strategic control model are structural.
The key need in analysis for strategic control is model flexibility.
The key activity in management control analysis is alternative generation.
The key skill required for management control analysis is creativity.
Action:
The relationship between action and outcome is weaker in strategic control.
The key action variables in strategic control are organizational.
Alternative actions in strategic control are less easy to choose in advance.
The worst failing in strategic control is omitting a worthwhile action.
The time for strategic control is longer.
The timing of strategic control is events oriented.
Strategic control has little repetition.
Implications for Information Systems
Strategic control requires a greater variety of data types.
The total volume of data required for strategic control is smaller.
Strategic control data are more aggregated.
Strategic control data are less accurate.
The most important strategic control information is structural.
The receipt of data for strategic control is more sporadic.
Strategic control data are less processable by computer.
The key decision in information for strategic control is what data to save.
Implications for Controlling Formal Plans
Contingency plans are less possible in strategic control.
Triggering contingency planning is more important in strategic control.
Preprogrammed variance analysis is less possible in strategic control.
A variance inquiry system is more necessary in strategic control.
A variance inquiry language is more necessary in strategic control.
An augmented formal planning system in more necessary in strategic control.
7.7. Approaches to the Evaluation Organizational Effectiveness
An organization's effectiveness is in major part a measure of the effectiveness of its master
strategy. Selection of the appropriate basis for assessing organizational effectiveness presents a
challenging problem for managers and researchers. There are no generally accepted
conceptualizations prescribing the best criteria. Different organizational situations - pertaining to
the performance of the organization's structure, the performance of the organization's human
resources, and the impact of the organization's activities -require different criteria. J. Barton
Cunningham, after reviewing the relevant literature, concluded that seven major ways of
evaluating organizational effectiveness existed:
o rational goal model, o organizational development
o systems resource model, model,
o managerial process model, o The bargaining model.
The overall outcome is a function of the particular strategies selected by the various decision-
makers in their bargaining relationships. This model measures the ability of decision-makers to
obtain and use resources for responding to problems important to them. Each of the subsystems'
needs should be evaluated from two focal points:
o efficiency and
o Stress.
Efficiency is an indication of the organization's ability to use its resources in responding to the
most subsystems' needs. Stress is the tension produced by the system in fulfilling or not
fulfilling its needs.
7.7.4. The Managerial Process Model
The managerial process model assesses the capability and productivity of various managerial
processes for performing goals. The managerial process model is based on the intuitive concept
of substantial rationality, which inter-relates the drives, impulses, wishes, feelings, needs, and
values of the individuals to the functional goals of the organization.
7.7.5. The Organizational Development Model
This model appraises the organization's ability to work as a team and to fit the needs of its
members. The model focuses on developing practices to foster:
1. supervisory behavior manifesting interest and concern for workers;
2. team spirit, group loyalty, and teamwork among workers and between workers and
management;
3. confidence, trust and communication among workers and between workers and
management;
4. More freedom to set their own objectives.
The model's procedure attempts to answer four main questions:
1. Where are we?
2. Where do we want to go?
3. How will we get there?
4. How will we know when we do get there?
These questions can be divided into four areas:
o question one is concerned with diagnosis,
o question two with the setting of goals and plans,
o question three with the implementation of goals, and
o Question four with evaluation.
This model is concerned with changing beliefs, attitudes, values, and organizational structures
so that individuals can be better adopt to new technologies and challenges. It is a process of
management by objectives in contrast to management by control.
7.7.6. The Structural Functional Model
The structural functional approach tests the durability and flexibility of the organization's
structure for responding to a diversity of situations and events. According to this model, all
systems need maintenance and continuity. The following aspects define this:
o security of the organization as whole in relation to the social forces in its environment
(this relates to ability to forestall threatened aggressions or deleterious consequences
from the actions of others);
o stability of lines of authority and communication (this refers to the continued capacity of
leadership to control and have access to individuals in the system);
o stability of informal relations within the organization;
o continuity of policy making (this refers to the ability to reexamine policy a continuing
basis);
o Homogeneity of outlook (this refers the ability to effectively orient members to
organization norms and beliefs).
7.7.7. The Functional Model
In the functional approach an organization's effectiveness is determined by the social
consequences of its activities. The crucial question to be answered is: How well do the
organization's activities serve the needs of its client groups? The appraisal of an organization's
effectiveness should consider whether these activities are function or dysfunctions in fulling the
organization's goals. These seven models have their strengths and shortcomings depending upon
the organizational situation being evaluated. The choice of evaluation approach usually hinges
on the organizational situation that needs to be addressed.
7.8. Strategic Control Process
Although control systems must be tailored to specific situations, such systems generally follow
the same basic process. Regardless of the type or levels of control systems an organization needs,
control may be depicted as a six-step feedback model:
1. Determine what to control. What are the objectives the organization hopes to accomplish?
2. Set control standards. What are the targets and tolerances?
3. Measure performance. What are the actual standards?
4. Compare the performance the performance to the standards. How well does the actual match
the plan?
5. Determine the reasons for the deviations. Are the deviations due to internal shortcomings or
due to external changes beyond the control of the organization?
6. Take corrective action. Are corrections needed in internal activities to correct organizational
shortcomings, or are changes needed in objectives due to external events?
Feedback from evaluating the effectiveness of the strategy may influence many of other phases
on the strategic management process. A well-designed control system will usually include
feedback of control information to the individual or group performing the controlled activity.
Simple feedback systems measure
outputs of a process and feed into the system or
the inputs of a system corrective action to obtain desired outputs.
The consequence of utilizing the feedback control systems is that the unsatisfactory performance
continues until the malfunction is discovered. One technique for reducing the problems
associated with feedback control systems is feed-forward control. Feed-forward systems:
monitor inputs into a process to ascertain whether the inputs are as planned;
if they are not, the inputs, or perhaps the process, are changed in order to obtain desired
results.
7.8.1. Determine What to Control
The first step in the control process is determining the major areas to control. Usually base their
major controls on the organizational mission, goals and objectives developed during the planning
process. Must make choices because it is expensive and virtually impossible to control every
aspect of the organization's activities. In deciding what to control,
The organization must communicate through the actions of its executives that strategic
control is a needed activity.
Without top management's commitment to controlling activities, the control system
could be useless.
7.8.2. Set Control Standards
The second step in the control process is establishing standards.
A control standard:
is a target against which subsequent performance will be compared.
Standards
are the criteria that enable managers to evaluate future, current, or past actions.
are measured in a variety of ways, including physical, quantitative, and qualitative terms.
Five aspects of the performance can be managed and controlled:
o quantity, o cost, and
o quality, o behavior.
o time
Each aspect of control may need additional categorizing.
An organization must identify the targets, determine the tolerances those targets, and specify the
timing of consistent with the organization's goals defined in the first step of determining what to
control. For example, standards might indicate. Standards may also reflect specific activities or
behaviors that are necessary to achieve organizational goals. Goals are translated into
performance standards by making them measurable. An organizational goal to increase market
share, for example, may be translated into a top-management performance standard to increase
market share by 10 percent within a twelve-month period. Helpful measures of strategic
performance include:
sales (total, and by division, product category, and region),
sales growth, cash flow,
net profits, market share,
return on sales, product quality,
assets, valued added, and
equity, and employees productivity.
investment cost of sales,
Quantification of the objective standard is sometimes difficult. For example, consider the goal of
product leadership. An organization compares its product with those of competitors and
determines the extent to which it pioneers in the introduction of basis product and product
improvements. Such standards may exist even though they are not formally and explicitly stated.
Setting the timing associated with the standards is also a problem for many organizations. It is
not unusual for short-term objectives to be met at the expense of long-term objectives.
These standards can be based on data derived from the PIMS (profit impact of market strategy)
program, published information that is publicly available, ratings of product / service quality,
innovation rates, and relative market shares standings. PIMS was developed by Professor Sidney
Shoeffler of Harvard University in the 1960s. Strategic control standards are based on the
practice of competitive benchmarking. The process of measuring a firm's performance against
that of the top performance in its industry. The proliferation of computers tied into networks has
made it possible for managers to obtain up-to-minute status reports on a variety of quantitative
performance measures. Managers should be careful to observe and measure in accurately before
taking corrective action.
7.8.4. Compare Performance to Standards
The comparing step determines the degree of variation between actual performance and
standard. If the first two phases have been done well, the third phase of the controlling process -
comparing performance with standards - should be straightforward. However, sometimes it is
difficult to make the required comparisons (e.g., behavioral standards). Some deviations from the
standard may be justified because of changes in environmental conditions, or other reasons.
7.8.5. Determine the Reasons for the Deviations
The fifth step of the control process involves finding out: "why performance has deviated from
the standards?" Causes of deviation can range from selected achieve organizational objectives.
Particularly, the organization needs to ask if the deviations are due to internal shortcomings or
external changes beyond the control of the organization. A general checklist such as following
can be helpful:
Are the standards appropriate for the stated objective and strategies?
Are the objectives and corresponding still appropriate in light of the current environmental
situation?
Are the strategies for achieving the objectives still appropriate in light of the current
environmental situation?
Are the firm's organizational structure, systems (e.g., information), and resource support
adequate for successfully implementing the strategies and therefore achieving the objectives?
Are the activities being executed appropriate for achieving standard?
The locus of the cause, either internal or external, has different implications for the kinds of
corrective action.
7.8.6. Take Corrective Action
The final step in the control process is determining the need for corrective action. Managers can
choose among three courses of action:
1. they can do nothing
2. they can correct the actual performance; or
3. They can revise the standard.
Maintaining the status quo if preferable when performance essentially matches the standards.
When standards are not met, managers must carefully assess the reasons why and take corrective
action. Moreover, the need to check standards periodically: is to ensure that the standards and
the associated performance measures are still relevant for the future. The final phase of
controlling process occurs when managers must decide action to take to correct performance
when deviations occur. Corrective action depends on
the discovery of deviations and
the ability to take necessary action.
Often the real cause of deviation must be found before corrective action can be taken. Causes of
deviations can range from unrealistic objectives to the wrong strategy being selected achieve
organizational objectives. Each cause requires a different corrective action. Not all deviations
from external environmental threats or opportunities have progressed to the point a particular
outcome is likely, corrective action may be necessary. There are three choices of corrective
action:
Normal mode follow a routine, no crisis approach; this take more time
Ad hoc crash mode saves time by speeding up the response process, geared to the problem ad
hand.
Preplanned crisis mode specifies a planned response in advance; this approach lowers the
response time and increases the capacity for handling strategic surprises. The below checklist
suggest the following five general areas for corrective actions:
Revise the Standards. It is entirely possible that the standards are not in line with objectives
and strategies selected. Changing an established standard usually is necessary if the standards
were set too high or to low are the outset. In such cases it's the standard that needs corrective
attention not the performance.
Revise the Objective. Some deviations from the standard may by justified because of changes
in environmental conditions, or other reasons. In these circumstances, adjusting the
objectives can y much more logical and sensible then adjusting performance.
Revise the Strategies. Deciding on internal changes and taking corrective action may involve
changes in strategy. A strategy that was originally appropriate can become inappropriate
during a period because of environmental shifts.
Revise the Structure, System or Support. The performance deviation may by caused by an
inadequate organizational structure, systems, or resource support. Each of these factors is
discussed elsewhere in this chapter, or other part of this thesis.
Revise Activity. The most common adjustment involves additional coaching by management,
additional training, more positive incentives, more negative incentives, improved scheduling,
compensation practices, training programs, the redesign of jobs or the replacement of personnel.
Managers can also attempt to influence events or trends external to itself through advertising or
other public awareness programs. In such case, the changes should be made only after the most
intense scrutiny. Management must remember that adjustments in any of the above areas may
require adjustments in one or more of the other factors. For example, adjusting the objectives is
likely to require different strategies, standards, resources, activities, and perhaps organizational
structure and systems.
The list is long and many other factors could be included. The objective of all of these
endeavors is financial control.
Summary Questions
Dear students by now you are able to identify somehow whether you are grasp the main
concept of this last chapter or not, so please go through them seriously and know your
position. The questions are:
1. How can you define the term control with regard to management concept?
2. List and clearly describe the three approaches of managerial controlling?
3. What are the types of control? List and discuss them?
4. What is strategy? How can we formulate good strategy? Can you list the three major
questions that used to evaluate the given strategy?
144 | P a g e