research
research
CMAJ 2006;175(9):1071-7
the 1990–1994 National Health Survey of Pakistan, conducted
by the Pakistan Medical Research Council, under the techni-
For the primary outcome, we performed logistic regression Health Statistics for that purpose. The final model included
analysis specific for complex survey designs21 that accounted variables that were associated with the outcomes at p < 0.05.
for the clusters (primary sampling units), strata (provinces) The presence of each of hypertension, diabetes and raised
and data weighted to the general population of Pakistan in serum cholesterol concentration was then entered into the fi-
1990, with weights calculated by the Pakistan Federal Bureau nal model to explore the independent association of BMI with
of Statistics and confirmed by the US National Center for these conditions.
Table 3: Association between overweight and obesity (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) and sociodemographic factors in the surveyed
Pakistani population aged 15 years or more
Age, yr, mean (SD)‡ 36.8 (17.3) 39.6 (15.3) 1.08 (1.06–1.10) 1.11 (1.09–1.13)
Ethnicity§ NS
Muhajir 1606 554 (34.5) 1.63 (1.17–1.28)
Punjabi 3536 859 (24.3) 1.00
Baluch 282 85 (30.1) 1.05 (0.68–1.64)
Sindhi 1425 293 (20.6) 0.96 (0.61–1.50)
Pashtun 1072 292 (27.2) 1.07 (0.69–1.65)
Other 1051 232 (22.1) 0.90 (0.61–1.34)
Male 4414 1019 (23.1) 0.73 (0.65–0.81) 0.66 (0.58–0.75)
Female 4558 1296 (28.4) 1.00 1.00
Urban residence 3239 1216 (37.5) 2.36 (1.76–3.16) 2.20 (1.62–2.99)
Rural residence 5733 1099 (19.2) 1.00 1.00
Literate (able to read) 2943 845 (28.7) 1.25 (1.06–1.48) 1.25 (1.09–1.44)
Illiterate (unable to read) 6029 1470 (24.4) 1.00 1.00
Economic status¶
High 1607 492 (30.6) 1.60 (1.08–2.39) 1.56 (1.06–2.26)
Middle 4396 1206 (27.4) 1.36 (1.06–1.74) 1.14 (0.88–1.46)
Low 2969 617 (20.8) 1.00 1.00
Food intake**
Meat, high 2719 994 (36.6) 2.13 (1.71–2.65) 1.65 (1.37-1.98)
Meat, low 6253 1321 (21.1) 1.00 1.00
Fruit, high 3224 972 (30.2) 1.34 (1.08–1.65) NS
Fruit, low 5748 1343 (23.4) 1.00
Milk, high 4431 1027 (23.2) 0.78 (0.66–0.92) NS
Milk, low 4541 1288 (28.4) 1.00
Eggs, high 1434 451 (31.5) 1.44 (1.17–1.77) NS
Eggs, low 7538 1864 (24.7) 1.00
Rice, high 2220 620 (27.9) 1.21 (0.95–1.55) NS
Rice, low 6752 1695 (25.1) 1.00
Potatoes, high 4672 1252 (26.8) 1.14 (0.90–1.44) NS
Potatoes, low 4300 1063 (24.7) 1.00
Use of cigarettes or “beddies”
Current 1412 328 (23.2) 0.82 (0.69–0.96) NS
Not current 7560 1987 (26.3) 1.00
Use of chewable tobacco or
snuff
Current 1003 233 (23.2) 0.83 (0.64–1.07) NS
Not current 7969 2082 (26.1) 1.00
Note: OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, SD = standard deviation, NS = not significantly associated with overweight in the multivariable model
and therefore not included in the final model.
*Unless stated otherwise.
†Adjusted for age, sex, urban v. rural dwelling, literacy status, economic status and high v. low intake of meat.
‡Odds ratios are for each 5-year increase.
§Reported as “mother tongue,” which is specific for each of the 5 major ethnic subgroups of Pakistan: Muhajir, Punjabi, Baluch, Sindhi and Pashtun.
¶The 3 levels were defined through a simple count of the number of items owned.
**Defined as high if the particular type of food was consumed at least every other day.
The sensitivity and specificity of the BMI for an association sensitivity of 56% and 59%, respectively, and a specificity of
with hypertension or diabetes were expressed by receiver op- 72% in both sexes. A cutoff value of 23 kg/m2 had a sensitivity
erating characteristic (ROC) curves. of 46% and 59% and a specificity of 78% and 73% in men and
women, respectively.
Results
Interpretation
Of the 9442 subjects aged 15 years or more, 470 women re-
ported being pregnant and were excluded from the analysis. This nationally representative survey showed 25.0% of the
Thus, our final sample was 8972 subjects. Pakistani population to be overweight or obese according to
The overall prevalence of overweight and obesity, weight- the Asian-specific BMI cutoff value of 23 kg/m2 and 10.3% to
ed to the general Pakistani population, was 25.0% (95% CI be obese according to the BMI cutoff value of 27 kg/m2. Our
21.8–28.2%). The prevalence was highest, 42.8%, among data confirm a major public health problem in Pakistan.
women aged 35–54 years but was also high among those Discussions around the global epidemic of obesity have
aged 15–24 years, at 12.4% for men and 13.8% for women often used the future tense for the developing world. We
(Table 1). Table 2 shows the weighted prevalence of over- have shown that current rates of overweight and obesity are
weight and obesity according to various BMI cutoff values. already unacceptably high among youths. This is of consid-
The overall weighted prevalence of obesity according to our erable concern for a number of reasons. Obesity tends to
study definition was 10.3% (95% CI 7.0%–13.2%). track within individuals and populations: obese children be-
The factors independently and significantly associated come obese adults. This tendency, combined with the con-
with being overweight or obese included greater age, being tinued trend toward urbanization, will serve to seriously es-
female, urban residence, being literate, and having a high calate adult levels of obesity: we observed a 2.5 times greater
(v. low) economic status and a high (v. low) intake of meat prevalence of obesity among urban residents than among ru-
(Table 3). ral residents. In addition, there are indications that obesity in
Being overweight or obese was independently associated youth coupled with low birth weight is the worst possible
with having hypertension, diabetes and a raised serum cho- combination for adult cardiovascular disease and diabetes,
lesterol concentration (Table 4). conditions to which Indo-Asian populations are already par-
The ROC curves (Fig. 1) illustrate the sensitivity and speci- ticularly susceptible.9
ficity of the BMI for an association with hypertension or dia- Critics have challenged the revised BMI thresholds for
betes. For hypertension, the optimal cutoff value for the BMI defining overweight in subpopulations on the grounds that
was 21.2 kg/m2 in both men and women, yielding a sensitivity these thresholds may not necessarily be associated with ad-
of 61% and 65% and a specificity of 68% and 63%, respec- verse clinical outcomes.22,23 However, data for Chinese sub-
tively. A cutoff value of 23 kg/m2 had a sensitivity of 43% and jects aged 40 years or over revealed a U-shaped association
50% and a specificity of 82% and 76% in men and women, re- of BMI with 10-year all-cause mortality rates, with the least
spectively. For diabetes, the optimal cutoff value for the BMI risk of death at a BMI of less than 21 kg/m2 among men and
was 22.1 kg/m2 in men and 22.9 kg/m2 in women, yielding a less than 22 kg/m2 among women.24 We found an inde-
Table 4: Association of overweight and obesity (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) with clinical characteristics in the surveyed
Pakistani population aged 15 years or more
Note: OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, SD = standard deviation, NS = not significantly associated with overweight in the multivariable
model and therefore not included in the final model.
*Unless stated otherwise.
†Based on the multivariable model. Adjusted for age, sex, urban v. rural dwelling, literacy status, economic status and high v. low intake of meat.
‡Defined as having a systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or greater or a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater (based on the mean
of the 2 readings) or currently receiving therapy with antihypertensive medication.
§Defined as having a nonfasting blood glucose concentration of 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) or greater or a history of diabetes mellitus.
¶Defined as a urine protein concentration of 30 mg/dL or greater as measured by a reagent strip (reading of 1+ or greater). Data on urine
protein levels were not available for 1224 people.
**For each increase of 5.0 mg/dL (0.13 mmol/L).
A Hypertension B Diabetes
BMI — Men BMI — Men
100 100
80 80
Sensitivity
Sensitivity
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
100 — Specificity 100 — Specificity
80 80
Sensitivity
Sensitivity
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
100 — Specificity 100 — Specificity
Fig 1: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the sensitivity and specificity of the association between body mass index
(BMI) and hypertension (A) and diabetes mellitus (B). For hypertension in men, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.68 (95% confi-
dence interval [CI] 0.66–0.69) and the optimal BMI cutoff value 21.2 kg/m2 (triangle); this BMI value had a sensitivity of 61% and a
specificity of 68%. The sensitivity and specificity were 43% and 82%, respectively, for a BMI cutoff value of 23 kg/m2 and 28% and 90%,
respectively, for one of 25 kg/m2. For hypertension in women, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI 0.65–0.68) and the optimal BMI cutoff value
21.2 kg/m2 (triangle); this value had a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 63%. The sensitivity and specificity were 50% and 76%,
respectively, for a BMI cutoff value of 23 kg/m2 and 37% and 85%, respectively, for one of 25 kg/m2. For diabetes in men, the AUC was
0.64 (95% CI 0.63–0.66) and the optimal BMI cutoff value 22.1 kg/m2 (triangle); this value had a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of
72%. The sensitivity and specificity were 46% and 78%, respectively, for a BMI cutoff value of 23 kg/m2 and 29% and 88%, respectively,
for one of 25 kg/m2. For diabetes in women, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI 0.65–0.68) and the optimal BMI cutoff value 22.9 kg/m2 (trian-
gle); this value had a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 72%. The sensitivity and specificity were 59% and 73%, respectively, for a
BMI cutoff value of 23 kg/m2 and 42% and 82%, respectively, for one of 25 kg/m2.
pendent association between a BMI of 23 kg/m2 or greater ulation. Immediate efforts are needed at a national level to
and the presence of hypertension, diabetes or a raised control this problem in Pakistan and possibly the neighbour-
serum cholesterol concentration. Further, the ROC curves ing developing countries.
showed that even lower cutoff values than the recom-
mended 23 kg/m2 (21.2 and 22.9 kg/m2 in women and 21.2 This article has been peer reviewed.
and 22.1 kg/m2 in men), albeit unadjusted for other factors, From the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Health Sci-
yielded the optimal areas under the curve for the associa- ences (Jafar, Pappas), and the Section of Nephrology, Department of Medi-
tions with hypertension and diabetes, respectively. Using a cine (Jafar), Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; the Division of Nephrol-
conventional cutoff value of 25 kg/m2 resulted in poor sen- ogy, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Tufts University
Medical School, Boston, Mass. (Jafar); and the National Heart and Lung In-
sitivity for both associations. Our findings support the use stitute, Imperial College, London, UK (Chaturvedi)
of a lower cutoff value of BMI (23 kg/m2 or even lower) for
identification of subjects with hypertension and diabetes in Competing interests: None declared.
programs screening for these chronic diseases in Indo- Contributors: Tazeen Jafar was the principal author and contributed to the
Asian populations. study concept and design and to the analysis and interpretation of data. Nish
Our analyses had limitations. Clinical diagnosis of hyper- Chaturvedi contributed to the study concept and the interpretation of data.
Gregory Pappas contributed to the acquisition of data. All of the authors re-
tension requires persistent elevation of blood pressure on re- vised the article critically for important intellectual content and gave final ap-
peated visits. However, the mean of multiple readings on the proval of the version to be published.
same day (2 readings in the National Health Survey of Pak- Acknowledgements: We thank members of the Pakistan Medical Research
istan) is considered acceptable for epidemiologic studies and Council and the US Department of Health and Human Services for their
has been used to diagnose hypertension in other surveys.25,26 assistance in the acquisition of data from the National Health Survey of Pakistan.
In the National Health Survey of Pakistan, blood was drawn This study was supported by a grant from the Fogarty International Cen-
ter, US National Institutes of Health.
without a requirement of fasting. Diabetes was defined as a
blood glucose concentration of 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) or
greater or a history of diabetes. This definition diverges from
the standard criterion of a fasting blood glucose concentration REFERENCES
1. Friedrich MJ. Epidemic of obesity expands its spread to developing countries.
of more than 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L).19 However, our main JAMA 2002;287:1382-6.
findings were unchanged when we performed a sensitivity 2. Galal OM, Hulett J. Obesity among schoolchildren in developing countries. Food
Nutr Bull 2005;26:S261-6.
analysis using the older blood glucose criterion of 200 mg/dL 3. Reddy KS, Yusuf S. Emerging epidemic of cardiovascular disease in developing
or greater.28 Thus, we believe that these findings are robust. countries. Circulation 1998;97:596-601.
We acknowledge that some dimensions of socioeconomic sta- 4. Reddy KS. Cardiovascular disease in non-Western countries. N Engl J Med 2004;
350:2438-40.
tus may not have been adequately captured, the food-fre- 5. He J, Gu D, Wu X, et al. Major causes of death among men and women in China.
quency questionnaire was not validated, and information on N Engl J Med 2005;353:1124-34.
6. Jafar TH, Jafary FH, Jessani S, et al. Heart disease epidemic in Pakistan: women
physical activity was not collected. In addition, our associa- and men at equal risk. Am Heart J 2005;150:221-6.
tions between obesity and health conditions were cross-sec- 7. Dhurandhar NV, Kulkarni PR. Prevalence of obesity in Bombay. Int J Obes Relat
Metab Disord 1992;16:367-75.
tional. However, there have been few high-quality cohort stud- 8. Deurenberg-Yap M, Schmidt G, van Staveren WA, et al. The paradox of low body
ies in the developing world that have assessed associations mass index and high body fat percentage among Chinese, Malays and Indians in
Singapore. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:1011-7.
between obesity and incident disease, and we believe that re- 9. Bhargava SK, Sachdev HS, Fall CH, et al. Relation of serial changes in childhood
verse causality is not a major problem for conditions that are body-mass index to impaired glucose tolerance in young adulthood. N Engl J Med
2004;350:865-75.
largely asymptomatic. Moreover, the main objective of our 10. Choo V. WHO reassesses appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations.
analyses was to determine the nationally representative preva- Lancet 2002;360:235.
lence of being overweight. Although we also identified some 11. World Health Organization, Western Pacific Region. The International Associa-
tion for the Study of Obesity and the International Obesity Task Force. The
sociodemographic factors associated with being overweight, Asia–Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. Sydney, Australia:
further, in-depth trials are needed to study the impact of Health Communications Australia Pty Limited; 2000. Available: www.diabetes
.com.au/pdf/obesity_report.pdf (accessed 2006 Aug 23).
strategies aimed at behaviour change that would target these 12. Pakistan Medical Research Council. National Health Survey of Pakistan 1990–1994.
factors as well as those identified previously in an attempt to Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Medical Research Council;1998:50.
13. Qureshi AA, Wajid G, Shaikh IA, et al. Ethical considerations for human investiga-
reduce the prevalence of being overweight or having central tion in the National Health Survey of Pakistan. Pakistan J Med Res 1992;31:270-4.
obesity in Pakistan.27 The sound epidemiologic design, high 14. Mallick MD. Sample design for the National Health Survey of Pakistan. Pakistan J
Med Res 1992;31(Suppl):289-90.
response rate and use of the modified Asian-specific defini- 15. Price CP, Koller PU. A multicentre study of the new Reflotron system for the meas-
tion of being overweight or obese are major strengths of our urement of urea, glucose, triacylglycerols, cholesterol, gamma-glutamyltrans-
findings, which are generalizable. ferase and haemoglobin. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1988;26:233-50.
16. Pappas G, Akhtar T, Gergen PJ, et al. Health status of the Pakistani population: a health
In conclusion, our study showed that 1 in 4 people in Pak- profile and comparison with the United States. Am J Public Health 2001;91:93-8.
istan over the age of 15 years is overweight or obese. We have 17. Durkin MS, Islam S, Hasan ZM, et al. Measures of socioeconomic status for child
health research: comparative results from Bangladesh and Pakistan. Soc Sci Med
demonstrated alarming rates of obesity among youths and 1994;38:1289-97.
women, indicating where, in particular, interventions should 18. Rolka DB, Narayan KM, Thompson TJ, et al. Performance of recommended
screening tests for undiagnosed diabetes and dysglycemia. Diabetes Care 2001;
be targeted. Owing to the better association of hypertension 24:1899-903.
and diabetes with an even lower BMI cutoff value (less than 19. Kuzuya T. Early diagnosis, early treatment and the new diagnostic criteria of dia-
betes mellitus. Br J Nutr 2000;84(Suppl 2):S177-81.
23 kg/m2), our findings support the use of Asian-specific 20. Jafar TH, Chaturvedi N, Gul A, et al. Ethnic differences and determinants of pro-
thresholds for the definition of being overweight in this pop- teinuria among South Asian subgroups in Pakistan. Kidney Int 2003;64:1437-44.
21. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-
Interscience, John Wiley & Sons; 1980. p. 1–134.
22. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and Editor’s take
its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-63.
23. Oh SW, Shin SA, Yun YH, et al. Cut-off point of BMI and obesity-related comor- • The rising prevalence of obesity in industrialized countries is
bidities and mortality in middle-aged Koreans. Obes Res 2004;12:2031-40.
24. Gu D, He J, Duan X, et al. Body weight and mortality among men and women in now well documented. It is generally known that people or
China. JAMA 2006;295:776-83. societies that move from famine to feast go through a time,
25. Hypertension control. Report of a WHO Expert Committee [Technical Report Se- often a generation, of overeating.
ries, no. 862]. Geneva: WHO; 1996.
26. Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of
hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA 2003;290:199-206. • The authors, in reviewing population survey data, estimate
27. Jafar TH, Levey AS, White FM, et al. Ethnic differences and determinants of diabetes
and central obesity among South Asians of Pakistan. Diabet Med 2004;21:716-23.
that Pakistan has a high prevalence of overweight and obe-
28. Lebovitz HE. Diagnosis, classification, and pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus. [dis- sity and find that the trend is similar to that already noted in
cussion 40-1]. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62(Suppl 27):5-9. China and other South Asian countries.
The complete
Publications Mail Agreement no. 41190522; PAP registration no. 9848. USPS #0762-530. USPS periodical postage paid at Champlain, NY. Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to CMA Member Service Centre, 1867 Alta Vista Dr., Ottawa ON K1G 3Y6
CMAJ•JAMC
picture
October 24, 2006, Vol. 175, No. 9 • Le 24 octobre 2006, vol. 175, no 9
on research.
PRACTICAL. RELEVANT. CMAJ IS NOW
MORE COMPREHENSIVE THAN EVER. Deep-vein thrombosis
Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment
reach make it THE place to publish leading Canadian BMI cutoffs should be used? angioedema without urticaria of Chaoulli v. Quebec