@prolegalminds

LL.B 3YDC V SEMESTER

ALTERNATE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION
NEGOTIATION | MEDIATION | CONCILIATION | ARBITRATION

www.prolegalminds.com
This book provides an in-depth understanding of Alternative Dispute Resolution
(ADR), focusing on its principles, processes, and applications. Covering Negotiation,
Mediation, Conciliation, and Arbitration, this guide integrates theoretical knowledge
with practical insights, case laws, and latest legal developments, including the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Mediation Act, 2023, and relevant
amendments.

Specially designed for law students, practitioners, and academicians, this book
bridges the gap between academic study and practical application of ADR
mechanisms in India and internationally.

“Justice delayed is justice denied – ADR paves the way for efficient and
amicable resolution of disputes.”

Osmania University | Faculty of Law 2024

 @prolegalminds

2024 OSMANIA UNIVERSITY

LL.B 3YDC - V SEMESTER

1. CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND LAW OF LIMITATION
2. BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITHA, LAW OF JUVENILE
JUSTICE AND PROBATION OF OFFENDERS ACT.
3. LAW OF BANKING AND NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS

www.prolegalminds.com
4. ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
5. PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
Our comprehensive guide is a must-have for every law student gearing up for the exams. It covers all
five subjects with precision, drawing upon a wealth of previous years' questions to provide you with
the most relevant content. Divided into three parts, each section is tailored to meet your specific
needs:

- Part A: Dive into short questions, each valued at 6 marks, designed to test your foundational
knowledge and understanding.
- Part B: Delve deeper with long answers, worth 16 marks each, allowing you to showcase your
analytical skills and expertise.

But that's not all! Our guide goes above and beyond by including a compilation of top landmark cases
for quick reference, ensuring you have all the tools you need at your fingertips.

Don't leave your success to chance. Invest in your future today with our indispensable guide and
embark on your journey towards academic excellence!

ProLegal Minds & Co

LAW FIRM FOR NATURAL JUSTICE
 LL.B. V SEMESTER
PAPER-V

ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Syllabus

Unit-I:
Alternate Dispute Resolution—Characteristics—Advantages and Disadvantages——
Unilateral — Bilateral — Triadic (Third Party) Intervention —Techniques And Processes--
Negotiation—Conciliation -Mediation- Arbitration - Distinction between Arbitration,
Conciliation and Negotiation – ADR under different laws in India

Unit-II:
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Historical Background and Objectives of
the Act — Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Acts, 2015 – Arbitration and
Conciliation Amendment Act, 2019 and 2019–Definitions of Arbitration,Arbitrator,
Arbitration Agreement -- Appointment of Arbitrator — Termination ofArbitrator–
Proceedings in ArbitralTribunal—Termination of Proceedings—ArbitralAward -- Setting
aside of Arbitral Award — Finality and Enforcement ofAward — Appeals – Conciliation
– Appointment of Conciliators – Powers and Functions of Conciliator--Procedure–
Settlement of disputes through conciliation Arbitration Council of India (ACI)– International
Commercial ArbitrationUNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial
Arbitration, 1985 – Geneva Convention, 1927 – New York Convention, 1958 –
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Award – UNCITRAL Model Law on
International Commercial Mediation and International Settlement Agreements Resulting
from Mediation, 2018 – Singapore Convention on Mediation, 2019 – Online
Dispute Resolution

Unit-III:
OtherAlternative Dispute Resolution Systems—Tribunals--Lokpal and Lokayukta—
Lok Adalats—FamilyCourts–Commercial Courts-Section89 and Order X, Rules 1A, 1B
and 1C of Civil Procedure Code – ADR and Mediation Rules – Pre-litigation Mediation
in India

PAPER-IV:
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The written examination of this paper will be for 50 marks and the remaining 50 marks
for record and viva voce. There shall be classroom instruction on the following topics:
 LL.B. V SEMESTER
PAPER-IV

ALTERNATE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION
Content
PART A - SHORT ANSWERS - 6 MARKS EACH

PART B - LONG ANSWERS - 16 MARKS EACH

PRACTICALS - 50 MARKS

LAND MARK CASES

SUGGESTED READINGS:

1. O.P. Tiwari: The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Allahabad Law Agency.
2. Johar's : Commentary on Arbitration andConciliationAct,1996,KamalLawHouse.
3.TripathiS.C.:Arbitration,ConciliationandADR,CentralLawAgency,
Allahabad.
4. AvatarSingh:ArbitrationandConciliation,EasternLawBookHouse,Lucknow.
5. P.C.Rao:AlternateDisputeResolution,2001Edition,UniversalBookTraders,
NewDelhi.
6. S.D.Singh:AlternateDisputeResolution,UniversalBookTraders,NewDelhi.
7. Sriram Panchu:Mediation-PracticeAndLaw(ThePathToSuccessfulDispute
Resolution),
2015, Lexis Nexis.
8. Anirban Chakraborty: Law & Practice Of Alternative DisputeResolution
In India-ADetailed Analysis, 2015,Lexis Nexis.
9. Madhusudan Saharay:TextbookonArbitration&ConciliationwithAlternative
DisputeResolution [ADR],Universal LawPublishing
10. MargaretL.Moses:ThePrinciplesandPracticeofInternationalCommercial
Arbitration, 2012, Cambridge University Press
11. Harsh Sethi and ArpanKr Gupta: International
CommercialArbitration&it'sIndianPerspective,2011UniversalLawPublishing

ProLegal Minds & Co

LAW FIRM FOR NATURAL JUSTICE
www.prolegalminds.com
 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER-1V

ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

PART A- QUESTION

1. Conciliation
2. Lok Adalat
3. Lok Pal
4. Tribunals
5. Family Courts
6. Negotiation
7. Foreign Award
8. Arbitration Agreement
9. Principals of Natural Justice
10. Adhoc Arbitration
11.Fast Track Arbitration
12. Drafting of settlement Agreement
13. Lokayukta
14. Arbitration Clause
15.Arbitral award.
16.Family Courts.
17.Section 89.
18.Advantages of ADR.
19.ODR.
20.Terminationof proceeding.
21.ArbitralTribunal.
22.Termination of Arbitrator.
23.Powers of Conciliator
24.lnterim Award.
 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

1. Conciliation

Conciliation is an ADR method where a neutral third party, called a conciliator, helps disputing
parties reach an amicable settlement. It is an informal, flexible, and voluntary process that seeks
to resolve disputes without litigation, emphasizing a collaborative approach to conflict resolution.

2. Process of Conciliation
The conciliation process involves the following steps:
• Initiation: Conciliation can be initiated by an agreement between the parties, often outlined in a
conciliation clause within their contract or by mutual consent at the time of the dispute.
• Appointment of Conciliators: Parties either appoint a conciliator or multiple conciliators (usually
one or two) as per the terms agreed upon or in accordance with the rules outlined in the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996.
• Meetings and Discussions: The conciliator facilitates meetings, allowing each party to present
their perspective and seek mutual understanding.
• Exploring Solutions: The conciliator identifies possible solutions and works with the parties to
narrow down options that could be acceptable to both sides.
• Settlement Agreement: If a mutually agreeable solution is reached, the conciliator drafts a
settlement agreement, which the parties sign, making it binding under Section 73 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3. Conciliator’s Job
The conciliator’s main role is to assist parties in identifying common ground and creating solutions
that satisfy both sides. Specific responsibilities include:
• Encouraging Communication: The conciliator encourages open communication between parties
to reduce misunderstandings.
• Suggesting Solutions: The conciliator may propose potential resolutions but does not impose
decisions, unlike in arbitration or litigation.
• Maintaining Neutrality: The conciliator must remain impartial, avoid conflicts of interest, and
handle all discussions confidentially as per Section 70 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996.
• Assisting in Drafting Settlement: If a resolution is reached, the conciliator helps draft a
settlement agreement that reflects the terms agreed upon by the parties.

4. Conciliation Agreement
A conciliation agreement, reached at the end of the conciliation process, is a written settlement
agreement that both parties voluntarily sign. According to Section 73 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996, this agreement has the same status and enforceability as an arbitral award
under Section 74, meaning it is binding and enforceable in court. This agreement finalizes the
conciliation process, providing both parties a legally recognized resolution.

5. Examples
In a dispute between a supplier and a retailer regarding delayed deliveries, a conciliator could help
them negotiate an agreement where the supplier offers compensation or revised delivery
schedules. Once both parties sign the settlement, it becomes enforceable, avoiding further
litigation.

www.prolegalminds.com 1 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

6. Reference Case Laws

• Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of Maharashtra (2000): The Court emphasized the voluntary
nature of conciliation, underscoring that conciliation is based on mutual consent and the
conciliator’s role is to guide parties towards an amicable solution.
• Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005): The Supreme Court stressed the
importance of ADR mechanisms, including conciliation, for reducing the judicial backlog,
recognizing the benefits of conciliation agreements in promoting speedy resolution of disputes.
Conciliation offers a practical and amicable path for dispute resolution, with a conciliator
facilitating discussions and assisting in creating a binding settlement agreement, ultimately
reducing the burden on the court system.

2. Lok Adalat

1. Definition
Lok Adalat, or “People’s Court,” is a statutory mechanism in India designed to resolve disputes
amicably through compromise and conciliation. It provides an accessible and cost-effective forum
for settling disputes outside traditional courts, following principles of social justice and fairness.
Lok Adalats operate under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

2. Constitution of Lok Adalat

The constitution and structure of Lok Adalats are determined by the respective Legal Services
Authorities (National, State, District, or Taluka levels). According to Section 19 of the Legal
Services Authorities Act, 1987, Lok Adalats can be organized at various levels by:
• National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) at the national level.
• State Legal Services Authorities at the state level.
• District Legal Services Authorities at the district level.
• Taluk Legal Services Committees at the taluka level.
Each Lok Adalat consists of a presiding officer, who is usually a retired judge, along with other
members who could include legal experts, social workers, or advocates with relevant experience.
In some cases, Lok Adalats also consist of judicial officers and public-spirited individuals as
conciliators to provide an unbiased view.

3. Functions of Lok Adalat

Lok Adalats aim to resolve disputes quickly, fairly, and at minimal or no cost to the parties. Their
primary functions include:
• Facilitating Settlements: Lok Adalats encourage parties to reach mutually agreeable
settlements through compromise and negotiation, reducing the need for prolonged litigation.
• Resolving Disputes on Various Matters: They can address a wide array of issues, including civil
cases, matrimonial disputes, minor criminal matters, and pending litigation.
• Reducing Court Burden: By handling cases that can be resolved through compromise, Lok
Adalats help ease the workload on the traditional court system.
• Granting Decree or Award: Any decision made by a Lok Adalat, known as an “award,” is deemed
to be a decree of a civil court, making it enforceable and binding on the parties under Section 21 of
the Act. No appeal lies against a Lok Adalat award, emphasizing its finality.

www.prolegalminds.com 2 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4. Process of Lok Adalat

The Lok Adalat process is simple, informal, and follows a structured yet flexible approach:
• Case Selection: Cases may be referred to Lok Adalats by courts, or they can be pre-litigation
cases where the dispute is brought directly to the Lok Adalat before reaching the court. Section
20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, provides the basis for cases being taken up in Lok
Adalats with the consent of the parties involved.
• Settlement Proceedings: Lok Adalats conduct hearings where parties present their viewpoints.
A conciliator or presiding officer encourages compromise by exploring possible solutions and
ensuring fair discussion.
• Mutual Agreement: The conciliators guide the parties towards a mutual agreement, which is
then documented as an award. Lok Adalats rely on the voluntary cooperation of the parties,
making the process more harmonious and cooperative.
• Award Issuance: Once a compromise is reached, an award is issued. This award has the status of
a civil court decree under Section 21 and is binding on the parties without the right to appeal.

5. Types of Cases Handled by Lok Adalats

Lok Adalats typically handle cases that are non-compoundable by law. They cover disputes in:
• Civil cases such as property, debt recovery, and contract disputes.
• Matrimonial and family matters.
• Criminal cases involving minor offenses.
• Traffic violations, public utility bills, and revenue disputes.
• Cases related to the Motor Vehicles Act, accidents, and insurance claims.

6. Examples
Lok Adalats are often utilized for quick resolution of motor vehicle accident compensation cases,
where victims or their families seek compensation from insurance companies. For instance,
instead of waiting for a prolonged trial, parties can approach a Lok Adalat, where a mediator helps
them reach an agreement on compensation.
In bank recovery cases, banks frequently approach Lok Adalats to settle loan disputes with
borrowers, especially when dealing with small loans or overdue amounts. The Lok Adalat helps
determine a fair settlement, which the borrower repays without facing court action.

7. Reference Case Laws

• State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (2008): The Supreme Court of India held that the award of Lok
Adalat is final and cannot be appealed, highlighting the finality and enforceability of Lok Adalat
awards under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
• B.P. Moideen Sevamandir v. A.M. Kutty Hassan (2009): The Court emphasized that Lok Adalat
decisions are binding and equivalent to a civil court decree, provided both parties voluntarily reach
a compromise.

www.prolegalminds.com 3 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3. Lokpal

1. Definition
Lokpal is an independent statutory anti-corruption body in India that investigates allegations of
corruption against public officials, including government servants and politicians. Established to
ensure accountability and transparency in public administration, Lokpal aims to combat corruption
effectively within the higher echelons of government.

2. Constitution of Lokpal
The Lokpal was constituted under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, in response to long-
standing demands for an anti-corruption body that would be free from executive influence. The
Lokpal is composed of a Chairperson and up to eight members, half of whom must have a judicial
background. Furthermore, at least 50% of the members must belong to categories such as
Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), minorities, or be
women.
• Chairperson: Typically a retired Chief Justice of India or a judge of the Supreme Court.
• Members: Up to eight, with at least 50% being judicial members. These members are appointed
through a selection committee that includes the Prime Minister, Speaker of the Lok Sabha, Leader
of the Opposition, Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice,
and an eminent jurist appointed by the President of India.

3. Functions of Lokpal
The Lokpal’s main objective is to investigate and address complaints of corruption against public
officials and act as a deterrent against corruption. Key functions include:
• Investigating Complaints: Lokpal investigates allegations of corruption against high-ranking
public officials, including the Prime Minister (subject to specific limitations), Union Ministers,
Members of Parliament, and senior government officials.
• Supervising Anti-Corruption Investigations: Lokpal supervises investigations conducted by the
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in cases related to public servants’ corruption.
• Prosecuting Corruption Cases: Upon finding sufficient evidence, Lokpal can direct agencies to
prosecute offenders and present the case in designated special courts.
• Recommending Preventive Measures: Lokpal has the authority to suggest measures for
preventing corruption and improving transparency within public administration.

4. Process of Lokpal Investigations

The Lokpal follows a structured process to ensure fairness and impartiality in corruption
investigations:
• Receiving Complaints: Complaints can be made by any citizen or organization, and Lokpal also
accepts complaints from public officials. Complaints against the Prime Minister can only be
investigated if they do not relate to international relations, external and internal security, public
order, atomic energy, and space.
• Preliminary Inquiry: Lokpal conducts a preliminary inquiry to assess whether the complaint has
merit. If the inquiry finds sufficient grounds, a full investigation is initiated.
• Full Investigation: Lokpal either undertakes a full investigation or directs a specialized agency
such as the CBI to investigate the matter under Lokpal’s supervision.

www.prolegalminds.com 4 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

• Prosecution and Court Proceedings: If the investigation finds credible evidence of corruption,
Lokpal may authorize the agency to prosecute the public official in a special court. Lokpal’s
investigative and prosecutorial authority ensures that corruption cases are handled transparently
and efficiently.
• Attachment and Confiscation of Assets: Lokpal has the power to attach or confiscate assets
obtained through corrupt means, as outlined in Section 24 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.

5. Examples
If there is a complaint of corruption against a high-ranking bureaucrat in a government ministry
regarding the misuse of public funds, Lokpal can investigate the allegations. After a preliminary
inquiry, if the complaint holds merit, Lokpal may direct the CBI to conduct a full investigation.
Similarly, in cases involving government officials misusing authority for personal gain, Lokpal can
prosecute those found guilty and confiscate the assets acquired through corrupt practices.

6. Reference Case Laws

• Pramod Kumar Sharma v. Union of India (2017): The Supreme Court reinforced the powers and
jurisdiction of Lokpal in holding public officials accountable, emphasizing the role of Lokpal in
ensuring clean and transparent governance.
• Anjali Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Union of India (2019): The Supreme Court addressed delays in the
appointment of Lokpal and other members, underlining the importance of having a functional anti-
corruption body to combat corruption effectively.
The Lokpal institution exemplifies India’s commitment to upholding integrity in public services,
ensuring transparency, and deterring corruption through comprehensive and impartial
investigations.

4. Tribunals

1. Definition
Tribunals are specialized quasi-judicial bodies established to adjudicate disputes and claims
related to specific areas of law. They serve as an alternative to regular courts, providing quicker
and specialized justice in areas like tax, labor, and administrative disputes. Tribunals often operate
under statutory authority and are designed to offer expertise, efficiency, and affordability in
resolving disputes.

2. Constitution of Tribunals
The Constitution of India, through the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, added Articles 323A and
323B, which authorize the establishment of tribunals. These articles enable the formation of
tribunals for specific matters:
• Article 323A: Deals with tribunals for resolving disputes related to public service, such as
administrative tribunals.
• Article 323B: Allows for the formation of tribunals in various other fields, including tax,
industrial, and land reforms disputes.
Tribunals are constituted by legislation that specifies their jurisdiction, powers, and procedures.
For instance, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the National Green Tribunal are constituted
under their respective Acts to handle disputes in income tax and environmental matters,
respectively.

www.prolegalminds.com 5 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3. Functions of Tribunals
Tribunals function as specialized bodies with expertise in the specific area they cover. Their key
functions include:
• Resolving Disputes Efficiently: Tribunals aim to provide speedy justice by resolving cases with
specialized knowledge in the respective field.
• Reducing Court Burden: By handling specialized cases, tribunals alleviate the burden on
traditional courts, helping reduce backlog.
• Offering Expertise: Tribunals are staffed with experts in relevant fields, ensuring that decisions
are informed by technical and legal knowledge.
• Providing Flexibility in Procedure: Tribunals generally follow simpler, more flexible procedures
than traditional courts, allowing for quicker resolution of disputes.

4. Process of Tribunal Proceedings

Tribunal proceedings, while generally less formal than traditional courts, follow a structured
process:
• Filing and Admittance of Case: The petitioner files a case in the tribunal, often directly or
through an appeal from a lower authority.
• Hearings and Evidence Collection: The tribunal conducts hearings where both parties present
their evidence and arguments. Tribunals may call experts, inspect documents, and hear witnesses
to ensure all relevant information is considered.
• Decision Making: After reviewing evidence and hearing arguments, the tribunal renders a
decision based on its technical and legal expertise. This decision can be appealed to a higher
tribunal or court, depending on the statutory provisions.
• Enforcement of Orders: Tribunal orders are binding and enforceable. In many cases, non-
compliance with tribunal orders can result in penalties, making their decisions authoritative.

5. Types of Tribunals
India has a range of tribunals covering various domains:
• Administrative Tribunals (e.g., Central Administrative Tribunal) for disputes related to public
services.
• Tax Tribunals (e.g., Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) for tax-related disputes.
• Environmental Tribunals (e.g., National Green Tribunal) for environmental and ecological
matters.
• Industrial Tribunals for labor and industrial disputes.
• Consumer Tribunals for consumer rights cases (e.g., National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission).

6. Examples
A taxpayer disputing an income tax assessment can appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT), where a specialized bench reviews the case based on tax laws. Similarly, an industrial
dispute involving worker layoffs may be resolved in an Industrial Tribunal, where labor laws are
considered in resolving disputes between employers and employees.

www.prolegalminds.com 6 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

7. Reference Case Laws

• L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997): The Supreme Court upheld the authority of tribunals
but ruled that their decisions are subject to judicial review by the High Courts, thereby maintaining
the constitutional right to approach higher courts.
• Madras Bar Association v. Union of India (2014): The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of
judicial independence for tribunals, ruling that tribunals must maintain procedural independence
and follow the principles of natural justice.
Tribunals are an integral part of India’s judicial system, providing a faster and more specialized
means to resolve disputes in specific legal areas, ultimately supporting the efficiency and
accessibility of justice.

5. Family Courts

1. Definition
Family Courts are specialized courts established to handle family-related disputes, including
marriage, divorce, custody, and maintenance issues. Created to provide a supportive and non-
adversarial environment, Family Courts aim to resolve family matters amicably and swiftly,
ensuring that the interests of all family members, especially children, are protected.

2. Constitution of Family Courts

Family Courts were established under the Family Courts Act, 1984. Section 3 of the Act mandates
the creation of Family Courts by the state government in consultation with the High Court
wherever the population warrants or based on case requirements. These courts are constituted
with a judge specially trained in family matters and are often aided by counselors and social
workers to foster reconciliation and support.

3. Functions of Family Courts

Family Courts are specifically designed to address family disputes in a constructive and efficient
manner. Their main functions include:
• Resolving Family Disputes: Family Courts handle cases related to marriage, divorce, child
custody, adoption, maintenance, and property division among family members.
• Facilitating Reconciliation: A significant function of Family Courts is to promote reconciliation
and settlement between parties, helping to resolve disputes amicably whenever possible.
• Offering Supportive Services: Family Courts often have counselors and social workers to assist
parties in understanding the impact of family disputes and to facilitate non-adversarial solutions.
• Providing Speedy Justice: Family Courts are structured to expedite the judicial process for
family matters, helping avoid the delays typical in regular courts.

4. Process of Family Court Proceedings

Family Courts follow a simplified and informal procedure to make proceedings more accessible
and less intimidating for families. Key stages include:
• Filing of Case: A party can file a petition in Family Court for matters such as divorce, custody, or
maintenance. In many cases, Family Courts encourage parties to seek mediation before
proceeding.
• Counseling and Mediation: Family Courts emphasize reconciliation, often referring parties to
counselors or mediators to reach a settlement without litigation.

www.prolegalminds.com 7 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

• Hearing: If reconciliation is not possible, the case proceeds to a hearing where both parties
present their evidence and arguments in a non-adversarial setting.
• Judgment and Orders: The Family Court issues orders based on the merits of the case, with a
focus on protecting the welfare of any children involved. The Court may pass orders regarding
custody, maintenance, and visitation rights.

5. Types of Cases Handled by Family Courts

Family Courts address various family-related matters, including:
• Marriage and Divorce: Cases related to annulment, divorce, and judicial separation.
• Custody and Guardianship: Determining the custody of children, guardianship, and visitation
rights.
• Maintenance and Alimony: Deciding on spousal support, child maintenance, and other financial
support matters.
• Property Disputes: Family-related property disputes, particularly in cases of divorce or
inheritance.
• Adoption: Cases involving legal adoption and parental rights.

6. Examples
Family Courts are commonly used for child custody disputes during divorce proceedings. For
instance, if parents are in disagreement over the custody of their child, the Family Court assesses
the best interests of the child, considering factors like the child’s education, emotional stability,
and parental abilities. In cases of spousal support, a Family Court can determine an appropriate
maintenance amount based on the financial circumstances of both parties.

7. Reference Case Laws

• K.A. Abdul Jaleel v. T.A. Shahida (2003): The Supreme Court upheld that Family Courts have the
jurisdiction to handle cases related to maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure
Code, 1973, recognizing their role in providing support to family members.
• D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010): The Court emphasized that Family Courts should interpret
family laws to promote justice within families, particularly when addressing maintenance and
financial support issues.
Family Courts promote a sensitive, supportive, and efficient process for resolving family disputes,
aiming to reduce adversarial confrontations and focus on family well-being, with particular
attention to children’s welfare.

6. Negotiation
1. Definition
Negotiation is an informal, voluntary process where parties involved in a dispute communicate
directly with each other to reach a mutually acceptable solution. It is the most basic form of
alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where parties retain control over the outcome and work
collaboratively without involving a third party.
2. Explanation of the Topic
In negotiation, the parties aim to understand each other’s needs, explore possible solutions, and
create an agreement that satisfies both sides. Negotiation is highly flexible, as it has no formal
procedural requirements, making it suitable for a wide range of issues, from business contracts to
family disputes. It is often the first step in dispute resolution and can be used alongside or before
other ADR methods like mediation or arbitration if needed.

www.prolegalminds.com 8 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3. Detailed Explanation
The process of negotiation typically includes:
• Preparation: Both parties prepare by identifying their goals, understanding the interests of the
other party, and evaluating potential solutions. Preparation is key to effective negotiation.
• Communication: Open and honest communication is essential. Parties should discuss their
positions, identify areas of agreement and disagreement, and share relevant information.
• Bargaining: The core of negotiation involves bargaining, where parties make concessions and
counter-offers. This phase often requires creative problem-solving and compromise.
• Agreement: If the parties can reach a common ground, they draft an agreement that reflects the
negotiated terms. This agreement may be formalized as a contract if necessary, particularly in
commercial negotiations.

4. Types of Negotiation
• Distributive Negotiation: Also known as “win-lose” or “zero-sum” negotiation, where each party
seeks to maximize their gain, often at the expense of the other party.
• Integrative Negotiation: Known as “win-win” negotiation, this approach focuses on finding
solutions that satisfy the interests of both parties, fostering a more cooperative atmosphere.
• Multi-Party Negotiation: Involves more than two parties and often requires additional planning
and facilitation to manage competing interests and reach a collective agreement.

5. Examples
In a business setting, two companies may negotiate the terms of a partnership agreement,
discussing profit sharing, responsibilities, and timelines. Negotiation can also occur in labor
disputes, where employees negotiate with management for improved working conditions, salaries,
or benefits without involving external arbitration or courts.

6. Reference Case Laws

• Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005): The Supreme Court underscored the
significance of negotiation and other ADR methods, encouraging their use in India’s judicial
system to reduce case backlog and foster amicable resolutions.
• Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (2010): The Court recognized
negotiation as an effective ADR method, particularly in civil and commercial disputes, urging
parties to explore negotiated settlements before resorting to litigation.

7. Foreign Award
1. Definition
A “Foreign Award” refers to an arbitral award made in a country outside India and recognized as
enforceable under the New York Convention (1958) or the Geneva Convention (1927). A foreign
award typically arises from international commercial arbitration and is enforceable in India under
the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, provided it meets specific legal
criteria.
2. Explanation of the Topic
Foreign awards are essential in international trade and commerce as they allow parties from
different jurisdictions to resolve disputes through arbitration and have the resultant award
enforced globally. In India, foreign awards are governed by Part II of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996,

www.prolegalminds.com 9 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

which incorporates the provisions of the New York and Geneva Conventions to facilitate the
enforcement of arbitral awards from signatory countries. A foreign award becomes enforceable in
India if it is deemed compliant with Indian laws and does not contravene public policy or
fundamental principles of Indian law.

3. Detailed Explanation with Section References

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, provides a framework for enforcing foreign awards as
follows:
• Section 44: Defines a foreign award as an award made in a territory that is a party to the New
York Convention and with which India has reciprocal arrangements.
• Section 47: Specifies the procedure for enforcing a foreign award, requiring the award-holder to
apply to a competent court and submit a duly authenticated copy of the award, original arbitration
agreement, and translations if required.
• Section 48: Outlines the conditions for refusing enforcement of a foreign award, such as
incapacity of parties, invalid arbitration agreements, or violation of public policy in India. Section
48(2) specifically allows refusal if the enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public
policy of India, which includes considerations like fraud or corruption.
• Section 49: Stipulates that a foreign award is enforceable as a decree of an Indian court once
the court is satisfied that it meets the enforceability requirements.

4. Examples
A dispute arises between an Indian company and a European supplier, and the matter is resolved
through arbitration in a European country. The arbitrator grants an award in favor of the European
supplier. To enforce this award in India, the supplier applies to an Indian court under the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. If the court is satisfied with the requirements under Section
48, the award becomes enforceable in India as a court decree, allowing the supplier to collect
damages.

5. Reference Case Laws

• Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1994): The Supreme Court defined the scope of
“public policy” as a ground to refuse enforcement, restricting it to fundamental policies of Indian
law, interests of India, and justice and morality. This case established guidelines on the application
of public policy in the context of foreign awards.
• Venture Global Engineering v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. (2008): The Supreme Court held
that Indian courts could not reopen the merits of a foreign arbitral award during the enforcement
process. The case reinforced that foreign awards are enforceable in India, with limited grounds for
objection.
Foreign awards play a critical role in facilitating international commercial relationships, ensuring
that arbitral awards are recognized and enforced across borders. This process supports smoother
and more efficient global trade and business by providing reliable legal recourse in case of
disputes.

www.prolegalminds.com 10 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

8. Arbitration Agreement
1. Definition
An arbitration agreement is a contract in which parties agree to resolve their disputes through
arbitration rather than through litigation in courts. This agreement can be a clause within a larger
contract or a standalone agreement that specifies that any disputes arising from the contract will
be submitted to arbitration.

2. Explanation of the Topic

An arbitration agreement is fundamental to the arbitration process, as it establishes the parties’
consent to resolve disputes outside of court and defines the terms of arbitration. The agreement
typically includes essential details such as the seat of arbitration, the number of arbitrators, the
rules governing the arbitration process, and whether the arbitration will be institutional or ad hoc.
Once a valid arbitration agreement exists, parties are generally bound by it, and courts will
typically refuse to entertain litigation on the issues covered by the agreement, as specified in
Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3. Detailed Explanation with Section References

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides specific provisions governing arbitration
agreements:
• Section 7: Defines an arbitration agreement as an agreement by the parties to submit to
arbitration all or certain disputes arising out of a defined legal relationship, contractual or
otherwise. The agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or a separate
agreement.
• Section 8: Mandates that if a legal action involving a matter that is subject to an arbitration
agreement is brought before a judicial authority, the court shall refer the parties to arbitration,
provided a party applies for this before submitting their first statement on the substance of the
dispute.
• Section 9: Allows parties to seek interim relief from a court before or during arbitration
proceedings, ensuring that urgent matters are addressed, such as preserving assets or
maintaining the status quo.
• Section 11: Governs the appointment of arbitrators, allowing courts to appoint an arbitrator when
parties fail to agree or if there is a dispute regarding the appointment process.

4. Key Elements of an Arbitration Agreement

For an arbitration agreement to be effective, it should contain certain essential elements:
• Clear Intent to Arbitrate: The language should unequivocally show that the parties intend to
resolve disputes through arbitration.
• Scope of Disputes: The agreement should specify the scope of disputes to be arbitrated,
covering all or specific issues related to the legal relationship.
• Arbitration Rules and Seat: It is advisable to specify the procedural rules (such as UNCITRAL or
institutional rules like those of the ICC) and the seat of arbitration.
• Number of Arbitrators: The agreement should state the number of arbitrators (usually one or
three), as it impacts the arbitration process’s efficiency and cost.

www.prolegalminds.com 11 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

5. Examples
In a commercial contract between an Indian software company and an American tech firm, the
parties may include an arbitration clause stating that any disputes arising from the contract will
be arbitrated under ICC rules, with the seat of arbitration in Singapore. This agreement ensures
that any disagreements are resolved through arbitration, preventing either party from filing a
lawsuit in court.

6. Reference Case Laws

• K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi (1998): The Supreme Court elaborated on the essential attributes of an
arbitration agreement, emphasizing that it should indicate the parties’ clear intention to refer
disputes to arbitration.
• Bharat Aluminum Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum Technical Services Inc. (2012): Known as the BALCO
judgment, the Court held that if parties choose a foreign seat of arbitration, Indian courts do not
have jurisdiction to interfere in the arbitration proceedings, establishing the importance of the
seat in arbitration agreements.
• Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Aksh Optifibre Ltd. (2005): The Court upheld that if there is a valid
arbitration agreement, the court’s role is to refer the matter to arbitration without delving into the
merits, ensuring the binding nature of the agreement.
An arbitration agreement empowers parties to control the dispute resolution process, promoting
efficiency and autonomy in commercial relationships and ensuring that disputes are settled
outside the traditional court system.

9. Principles of Natural Justice

Principles of Natural Justice
1. Definition
The principles of natural justice are fundamental rules that ensure fairness, transparency, and
impartiality in judicial and administrative proceedings. These principles serve as the foundation for
ensuring that justice is administered fairly, upholding the rule of law, and protecting individuals
from arbitrary decision-making.
2. Explanation of the Topic
The principles of natural justice are rooted in common law and are applied across judicial, quasi-
judicial, and administrative bodies. In India, these principles are inherent to the concept of fair play
in any decision-making process that affects the rights and obligations of individuals. Natural
justice does not have rigid rules; instead, it is based on fundamental principles that protect
against unfair or biased proceedings. The two primary principles are:
• Nemo Judex in Causa Sua (No one should be a judge in their own cause): This principle prevents
bias by ensuring that the decision-maker has no personal interest in the case, thus safeguarding
impartiality.
• Audi Alteram Partem (Hear the other side): This principle mandates that each party in a dispute
has the right to be heard before a decision is made. It includes the right to notice of proceedings
and an opportunity to present one’s case.
3. Detailed Explanation with Application in Indian Law
In Indian jurisprudence, the principles of natural justice are not explicitly codified but are
embedded in various laws and are applied by the judiciary. These principles are enforceable in
judicial, quasi-judicial, and administrative proceedings to ensure a fair process.

www.prolegalminds.com 12 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

• Nemo Judex in Causa Sua: This principle is implemented by disqualifying judges or adjudicators
who have any interest in the outcome of a case. In situations where there is a likelihood of bias or
conflict of interest, courts ensure that such persons do not participate in the decision-making
process.
• Audi Alteram Partem: This principle is applied to provide the affected parties with sufficient
notice of the proceedings, access to evidence, and the opportunity to present their case. It
mandates the right to legal representation, the right to cross-examine witnesses, and the right to
access all relevant documents.

Application in Indian Constitution and Judicial Review

• Article 14: The right to equality before the law and equal protection of the laws inherently
includes fair procedure.
• Article 21: The right to life and personal liberty includes the right to a fair trial and due process,
making natural justice an integral part of administrative and judicial proceedings.

4. Examples
A case involving the dismissal of an employee from a government job without a hearing would
violate the principle of audi alteram partem. If an administrative authority fails to give the
employee a chance to defend themselves, the dismissal would be deemed invalid, as the principles
of natural justice were not followed.
In another instance, if a judge is related to one of the parties in a property dispute, they must
recuse themselves to prevent any perceived bias. Failure to do so would breach the principle of
nemo judex in causa sua, compromising the fairness of the trial.

5. Reference Case Laws

• Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): The Supreme Court expanded the scope of Article 21 and
ruled that the principles of natural justice are inherent in the right to life and personal liberty. The
Court emphasized that any procedure that affects personal liberty must follow fair, just, and
reasonable standards, including natural justice.
• A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969): This landmark case underscored the application of natural
justice principles in administrative decisions. The Court held that even administrative proceedings
must adhere to natural justice principles when they affect individuals’ rights, thus blurring the line
between administrative and quasi-judicial actions.
• State of Orissa v. Dr. Binapani Dei (1967): The Supreme Court ruled that administrative actions
that affect rights must comply with natural justice principles, specifically the right to a fair
hearing.
The principles of natural justice are central to ensuring fairness and preventing arbitrary decisions
in legal and administrative proceedings, ultimately fostering public trust in the justice system.

www.prolegalminds.com 13 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

10. Adhoc Arbitration.

1. Definition
Ad hoc arbitration is a type of arbitration where the parties themselves determine the procedure
for resolving their dispute, rather than relying on an institutional framework. This form of
arbitration allows the parties to manage and control the arbitration process without adhering to
predefined rules from an arbitration institution.

2. Explanation of the Topic

In ad hoc arbitration, the parties or their appointed arbitrators organize the proceedings based on
mutually agreed terms or by following the applicable arbitration laws, such as the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 in India. Unlike institutional arbitration, where an arbitral institution (such
as the ICC or LCIA) provides administrative support and procedural rules, ad hoc arbitration is
conducted independently by the parties and the arbitrators they appoint. This type of arbitration is
typically more flexible and cost-effective but requires greater cooperation between parties for
smooth functioning, as it lacks institutional support for managing disputes or procedural delays.

3. Detailed Explanation with Section References

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides the legal framework for ad hoc arbitration in
India:
• Section 10: Allows the parties to determine the number of arbitrators. If the parties fail to
specify, the default is a sole arbitrator.
• Section 11: Governs the appointment of arbitrators. If parties are unable to agree on an
arbitrator, the Act allows either party to request that the court appoint one, ensuring the
arbitration process can proceed even in case of disputes about the arbitrator.
• Section 19: Establishes that parties are free to determine the arbitration procedure. If the parties
do not specify the procedure, the arbitral tribunal can conduct proceedings in a manner it deems
appropriate.
• Section 28: Allows the parties to choose the governing law for the arbitration, providing
flexibility in resolving cross-border disputes.
• Section 31: Sets the guidelines for the arbitral award, including its form and content, and the
timeframe within which it should be rendered.
The absence of institutional rules allows parties greater flexibility in choosing the process,
procedures, timelines, and governing law. However, it may also lead to procedural challenges or
delays if the parties lack clarity or consensus on procedural matters.

4. Advantages and Disadvantages of Ad hoc Arbitration

Advantages:
• Cost-Effective: Ad hoc arbitration eliminates institutional fees, potentially making it more
economical than institutional arbitration.
• Flexibility: Parties can design procedures that suit their specific needs, selecting arbitrators,
rules, and schedules that align with their preferences.
• Control: Parties have complete control over the process, including appointment of arbitrators,
timelines, and procedural rules, allowing for a more tailored dispute resolution process.

www.prolegalminds.com 14 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Disadvantages:

• Lack of Administrative Support: The absence of institutional oversight can lead to procedural
inefficiencies or delays, especially if parties disagree on key elements.
• Risk of Delay: Without fixed timelines or oversight, ad hoc arbitration may face delays if parties
are not cooperative or if the tribunal does not enforce a strict timetable.
• Potential for Higher Costs: While initial costs may be lower, delays or procedural disputes can
increase the overall expense, especially if court intervention is required.

5. Examples
Two companies from different countries may choose ad hoc arbitration to resolve a contractual
dispute without relying on an arbitral institution. They agree on a neutral arbitrator and establish a
customized procedure, such as timelines for submitting evidence and conducting hearings. If
disagreements arise regarding procedural matters, they may need to rely on the local arbitration
laws of the seat of arbitration to resolve the issues.

6. Reference Case Laws

• M/S Narain Das R. Israni v. Sindhu Resettlement Corporation Ltd. (2009): The Supreme Court
upheld that ad hoc arbitration is a valid arbitration method under the Arbitration and Conciliation
Act, 1996, and reiterated the court’s limited role in ad hoc arbitration.
• Centrotrade Minerals & Metal Inc. v. Hindustan Copper Ltd. (2006): This case highlighted the
potential complications in ad hoc arbitration when there are procedural disputes. The Supreme
Court discussed the enforcement of ad hoc arbitral awards and emphasized the need for clarity in
procedural agreements.

www.prolegalminds.com 15 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

11. Fast Track Arbitration.

1. Definition
Fast track arbitration is an expedited form of arbitration where the parties agree to resolve their
dispute within a shortened timeframe, following a streamlined procedure. This approach is
particularly useful for cases that require quick resolution, reducing the time and costs associated
with the standard arbitration process.

2. Explanation of the Topic

In fast track arbitration, parties mutually consent to an accelerated process where procedural
formalities are minimized. This often includes limiting the number of hearings, restricting the time
for each hearing, setting strict deadlines for submissions, and choosing a single arbitrator instead
of a panel. Fast track arbitration is designed for disputes that are straightforward and can be
decided with limited examination of evidence and witnesses. In India, Section 29B of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs the process for fast track arbitration.

3. Detailed Explanation with Section References

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allows for fast track arbitration under Section 29B,
which provides specific guidelines:
• Section 29B(1): States that parties may agree in writing to conduct arbitration under a fast track
procedure, either before or after the dispute arises.
• Section 29B(3): Specifies that the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute on the basis of
written pleadings, documents, and submissions without an oral hearing, unless requested by all
parties or deemed necessary by the tribunal.
• Section 29B(4): Requires the arbitrator to issue an award within six months from the date of the
tribunal’s constitution, ensuring a swift resolution. This deadline can be extended if necessary, but
only with the court’s approval.
• Section 29B(6): States that fees payable to the arbitrator should be determined based on the
simplified procedure, typically lower than traditional arbitration fees.
Fast track arbitration offers an effective alternative for parties seeking a speedy dispute
resolution process, particularly for commercial disputes where time is critical. The flexibility in this
arbitration form allows parties to avoid lengthy procedural requirements, although it requires
strong cooperation and mutual agreement on the process.

4. Advantages and Disadvantages of Fast Track Arbitration

Advantages:
• Speed: By setting a defined timeframe, fast track arbitration enables disputes to be resolved
much faster than regular arbitration or litigation.
• Reduced Costs: Fewer hearings, a simplified process, and a single arbitrator often lead to lower
overall costs.
• Efficiency: Streamlined procedures allow the parties to focus on essential matters, making the
arbitration process more efficient.

www.prolegalminds.com 16 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Disadvantages:
• Limited Scope for Evidence and Arguments: Due to time constraints, the opportunity to present
extensive evidence or conduct detailed examinations is reduced.
• Suitability for Simple Cases Only: Fast track arbitration is best for straightforward cases.
Complex cases with multiple issues may not be suitable due to the limited procedural framework.
• Less Flexibility: The emphasis on speed may reduce the flexibility that parties have in the
arbitration process, potentially affecting the comprehensiveness of the award.

5. Examples
Two companies involved in a contractual dispute regarding a missed deadline might opt for fast
track arbitration to avoid disrupting their business operations. By agreeing to a six-month
resolution process, they can quickly obtain a binding decision, allowing them to continue their
business relationship without prolonged uncertainty.

6. Reference Case Laws

• ONGC v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003): Although not directly about fast track arbitration, this case
reinforced the idea of efficiency and minimal judicial interference in arbitration proceedings,
supporting the need for expedited dispute resolution.
• M/s Icomm Tele Ltd. v. Punjab State Water Supply and Sewerage Board (2019): This case discussed
the need for arbitration to be efficient and effective, highlighting the importance of fast and
economical dispute resolution mechanisms within the framework of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996.

12. Drafting of settlement Agreement

1. Definition
A settlement agreement is a legally binding document that resolves a dispute between two or
more parties. It details the terms agreed upon by the parties to settle the conflict, eliminating the
need for litigation or arbitration. Once signed, a settlement agreement is enforceable and can be
presented in court as evidence of the agreed-upon resolution.

2. Explanation of the Topic

The drafting of a settlement agreement is a critical process in alternative dispute resolution
(ADR), as it formalizes the terms agreed upon by the parties and ensures clarity and enforceability.
The agreement should accurately reflect the settlement terms, including any obligations,
payments, or actions each party must undertake. In India, settlement agreements are commonly
drafted in mediation, conciliation, or Lok Adalat proceedings, and they must comply with relevant
legal principles to be effective and binding.

3. Key Elements of a Settlement Agreement

A well-drafted settlement agreement generally includes the following elements:
• Title and Introductory Paragraph: The document should begin with a title like “Settlement
Agreement” and a brief introductory paragraph outlining the purpose and background of the
agreement.
• Identification of Parties: Each party’s legal name, address, and other identifying information
should be clearly stated.
• Recitals: Recitals provide the context of the dispute and the reason for reaching a settlement,
explaining why the agreement was made.
www.prolegalminds.com 17 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

• Definitions and Interpretation: If specific terms or phrases are used frequently, they should be
defined to avoid ambiguity.
• Terms of Settlement: The core of the agreement, this section should outline the terms of the
settlement in detail, including any obligations, payments, or actions each party must take.
• Confidentiality Clause: Often, parties agree to keep the terms of the settlement confidential,
especially in commercial or sensitive disputes.
• Release and Waiver of Claims: This clause specifies that both parties release each other from
any claims or liabilities related to the dispute, signifying the finality of the settlement.
• Dispute Resolution Clause: In case of future disputes related to the settlement, this clause
specifies how they will be resolved (e.g., mediation, arbitration).
• Governing Law and Jurisdiction: The agreement should specify the law under which it will be
interpreted and the jurisdiction in case of any enforcement issues.
• Execution and Signature: The agreement concludes with the signatures of all parties involved
and, if applicable, their legal representatives.

4. Legal Framework in India

In India, a settlement agreement made during conciliation is enforceable as per the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996 (particularly Section 73 for conciliation settlements). If parties reach a
settlement in a Lok Adalat, the settlement award is deemed equivalent to a court decree under
Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, making it final and binding without the
possibility of appeal.

5. Examples
In a commercial dispute over a contract breach, two companies may enter into a settlement
agreement where one party agrees to pay a specified amount, while the other agrees to withdraw
its claims. The agreement would outline the payment terms, the timeline for execution, and a
release clause indicating that neither party will pursue further claims related to the breach.

6. Reference Case Laws

• B.P. Moideen Sevamandir v. A.M. Kutty Hassan (2009): The Supreme Court held that settlements
reached in Lok Adalats are binding and have the same status as a decree, emphasizing the
enforceability of settlement agreements in ADR.
• Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of Maharashtra (2000): This case highlighted the enforceability
of a conciliation settlement under Section 73 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,
emphasizing that parties can enforce settlements reached in ADR processes.

7. Best Practices in Drafting a Settlement Agreement

• Clarity and Precision: The language should be clear, precise, and free from ambiguity to prevent
misunderstandings.
• Legal Compliance: Ensure the agreement complies with relevant Indian laws and adheres to the
procedural requirements of ADR methods like conciliation and Lok Adalat.
• Mutual Intent and Consent: All parties must genuinely consent to the terms, ensuring the
agreement reflects mutual understanding.
• Future-Proofing: Anticipate and address potential issues, such as payment delays or non-
performance, and include clauses to manage these risks.A well-drafted settlement agreement is
crucial to ensuring that the terms of a dispute resolution are clearly recorded and legally
enforceable, providing closure and certainty to all parties involved.

www.prolegalminds.com 18 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

13. Lokayukta
1. Definition
Lokayukta is an anti-corruption ombudsman organization in Indian states, established to
investigate complaints of corruption and maladministration against public officials, including
politicians and government servants at the state level. The Lokayukta’s objective is to ensure
accountability and integrity in public services at the state level.

2. Explanation of the Topic

The Lokayukta is designed as a state-level counterpart to the national-level Lokpal, operating
under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. Each state has the power to establish its own
Lokayukta, and its structure and powers may vary from one state to another, depending on state-
specific legislation. The Lokayukta’s role is to investigate complaints of corruption, abuse of
power, or misuse of government resources. While Lokayuktas have judicial powers to probe
allegations, they also play an advisory role in ensuring transparency and preventing corruption in
state administration.

3. Constitution and Structure of Lokayukta

The structure and jurisdiction of Lokayuktas vary across Indian states. Each state government has
the authority to determine the composition of the Lokayukta, which usually includes:
• Lokayukta (Head): A high-ranking judicial officer, such as a retired Chief Justice of a High Court
or an eminent legal expert, appointed as the head.
• Uplokayukta(s): These are subordinate officials appointed to assist the Lokayukta, often with
jurisdiction over specific districts or areas within the state.
The Lokayukta is generally appointed by the state government, in consultation with the Chief
Justice of the respective High Court, the Leader of the Opposition, and other state officials as per
the Lokayuktas Act.

4. Functions of Lokayukta
Lokayuktas are entrusted with a range of functions aimed at addressing and reducing corruption
within the state government’s machinery:
• Investigating Complaints: The Lokayukta investigates complaints against public servants,
including ministers, legislators, and high-ranking officials, when allegations of corruption,
misconduct, or maladministration are made.
• Supervising Investigations: The Lokayukta can oversee and direct investigations, either
independently or through state investigative agencies, and may require the assistance of the
police or state vigilance departments.
• Advisory Role: Lokayuktas advise state governments on steps to improve governance,
transparency, and integrity in public administration.
• Submitting Reports: The Lokayukta may submit reports to the state government on corruption
cases and recommend measures or penalties against officials found guilty.

5. Process of Lokayukta Investigations

• Complaint Filing: Any citizen can file a complaint with the Lokayukta. Complaints are usually
filed against state public officials for issues related to corruption, abuse of power, or improper
conduct.
• Preliminary Inquiry: Lokayukta first conducts a preliminary inquiry to assess the complaint’s
validity. If there is merit, the Lokayukta proceeds with a formal investigation.

www.prolegalminds.com 19 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

• Investigation: During the investigation, the Lokayukta examines evidence, summons witnesses,
inspects documents, and may use state resources, including the assistance of state police or other
investigative bodies.
• Report and Recommendations: Upon concluding the investigation, the Lokayukta issues a report
with findings and recommendations. If the Lokayukta finds evidence of corruption or misconduct,
it can recommend action to the state government. The Lokayukta’s findings are usually advisory,
but they hold moral and political weight.

6. Examples
If a high-ranking state official is accused of misusing government funds allocated for a
development project, a citizen or public interest group can file a complaint with the Lokayukta. The
Lokayukta would then investigate the claim, gather evidence, and, if substantiated, submit a
report recommending action to the state government. Similarly, in cases involving improper
appointments or favoritism in government contracts, the Lokayukta can investigate and suggest
corrective measures.

7. Reference Case Laws

• Justice Chandrashekaraiah (Retd.) v. Janekere C. Krishna & Ors. (2013): The Supreme Court
emphasized the importance of the Lokayukta’s role in state-level anti-corruption efforts,
reinforcing the independence of the Lokayukta to probe corruption cases in state administration.
• A. C. Reddy v. Lokayukta of Karnataka (2016): The Court upheld the Lokayukta’s authority to
investigate state public officials, acknowledging the Lokayukta’s power to bring accountability
within the state governance system.

14. Arbitration Clause.

1. Definition
An arbitration clause is a provision within a contract that mandates that any disputes arising out
of the contract will be resolved through arbitration rather than through litigation in court. This
clause serves as a pre-dispute agreement between parties to refer any future disputes to
arbitration, ensuring a private, binding resolution process.

2. Explanation of the Topic

An arbitration clause is a vital part of dispute resolution in commercial agreements, as it provides
an alternative to court litigation and gives parties more control over the resolution process. The
clause typically specifies the rules of arbitration, the seat of arbitration (location), the number of
arbitrators, and the governing law. If a dispute arises, the arbitration clause binds the parties to
resolve their issues in accordance with the terms of the clause, ensuring a binding and enforceable
decision by an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators.

3. Detailed Explanation with Section References

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, governs the enforceability of arbitration clauses in
India. Important sections related to arbitration clauses include:
• Section 7: Defines an arbitration agreement and recognizes an arbitration clause within a
contract as valid. According to this section, an arbitration clause is a part of the arbitration
agreement, which can either be in the form of a separate agreement or included within the main
contract.

www.prolegalminds.com 20 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

• Section 8: If a dispute covered by an arbitration clause is brought before a court, this section
mandates that the court must refer the parties to arbitration upon the request of one of the
parties, provided the request is made before submitting the first statement on the dispute.
• Section 11: Governs the appointment of arbitrators as specified in the arbitration clause. If the
parties are unable to agree on an arbitrator, they may approach the court for assistance, as
outlined under Section 11.
• Section 16: Provides the “Kompetenz-Kompetenz” principle, allowing the arbitral tribunal to rule
on its jurisdiction, including objections related to the existence or validity of the arbitration clause.
A well-drafted arbitration clause minimizes ambiguity by explicitly stating the process for
resolving disputes and eliminating the need for court intervention unless absolutely necessary.

4. Essential Elements of an Arbitration Clause

A comprehensive arbitration clause should include:
• Scope of Arbitration: Specify which types of disputes are subject to arbitration, such as “any
dispute arising out of or related to this contract.”
• Rules Governing Arbitration: Specify the rules of arbitration, such as ICC, SIAC, or UNCITRAL
rules, or indicate ad hoc arbitration if no institution is involved.
• Seat of Arbitration: The seat or location of arbitration is critical, as it determines the procedural
law that governs the arbitration.
• Number of Arbitrators: Specify the number of arbitrators (usually one or three), as it affects the
time and cost of arbitration.
• Language of Arbitration: Mention the language in which proceedings will be conducted,
especially in international contracts.
• Confidentiality Clause: Optional but common in commercial arbitration, this clause ensures
confidentiality of the proceedings.

5. Examples
In a technology licensing contract, the parties may include an arbitration clause specifying that
any dispute arising out of the agreement will be settled by arbitration under the rules of the
Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), with Singapore as the seat of arbitration, and
English as the language of the proceedings. This clause prevents either party from filing a lawsuit,
ensuring that disputes are handled privately through arbitration.

6. Reference Case Laws

• Bharat Aluminum Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum Technical Services Inc. (2012): Known as the BALCO
judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that if parties choose a foreign seat of arbitration, Indian
courts do not have jurisdiction to intervene, underscoring the significance of specifying the seat of
arbitration in an arbitration clause.
• K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi (1998): The Supreme Court clarified that an arbitration clause must clearly
indicate the parties’ intent to submit disputes to arbitration, reinforcing that arbitration clauses
must be explicit to be enforceable.
• Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Aksh Optifibre Ltd. (2005): The Court affirmed that if an arbitration
clause exists, courts must honor the arbitration agreement and refer the matter to arbitration,
emphasizing the binding nature of arbitration clauses.

www.prolegalminds.com 21 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

15.Arbitral award.

An Arbitral Award is the final decision made by an arbitral tribunal to resolve a dispute referred to
arbitration. It can decide on monetary claims, declaratory reliefs, or specific performance. The
award is binding, enforceable, and has the same effect as a decree of a court.

Key Features of an Arbitral Award

1. Binding Nature:
• The award is final and binding on the parties, enforceable under Section 36 of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. Form and Content (Section 31):
• Must be in writing and signed by all arbitrators.
• Should include reasons unless parties agree otherwise.
• Must mention the date and place of arbitration.
3. Types of Awards:
• Final Award: Resolves all issues in dispute.
• Interim Award: Decides specific issues before the final resolution.
• Consent Award: Based on mutually agreed terms between parties.

Requirements for Validity

1. The award must adhere to the arbitration agreement.
2. It must comply with the procedural rules under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
3. The tribunal must give equal opportunity to all parties to present their case, ensuring natural
justice.

Challenge to an Arbitral Award

Under Section 34, an award can be challenged on grounds like:
• Violation of natural justice.
• Invalid arbitration agreement.
• The award is against the public policy of India (e.g., fraud, corruption).
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
1. Domestic Awards:
• Enforceable as a court decree under Section 36 unless challenged.
2. Foreign Awards:
• Recognized under the New York Convention, 1958, and Geneva Convention, 1927, as per
Sections 44 to 52 of the Act.
Landmark Cases on Arbitral Awards
1. ONGC v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003): Expanded “public policy” to include patent illegality.
2. Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1994): Defined the scope of public policy for
foreign awards.

Conclusion
An arbitral award is the cornerstone of arbitration, providing finality to disputes. Governed by the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it ensures efficiency, enforceability, and justice. However,
adherence to procedural and legal standards is essential for its validity.

www.prolegalminds.com 22 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

16.Family Courts

Introduction to Family Courts

Family Courts are special courts established to deal with disputes related to family and
matrimonial matters. They aim to promote conciliation, amicable settlement, and provide a quick,
cost-effective, and efficient mechanism for resolving disputes within the family.
The concept of Family Courts in India is governed by the Family Courts Act, 1984, enacted to
ensure the speedy resolution of disputes relating to marriage, divorce, child custody, maintenance,
and other family matters.

Objective of Family Courts

The primary objectives of Family Courts are:
1. To promote reconciliation and amicable settlement of family disputes.
2. To avoid lengthy, formal procedures of traditional courts.
3. To ensure quick and inexpensive justice for family matters.

Jurisdiction of Family Courts (Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984)

Family Courts have jurisdiction over:
1. Matrimonial Disputes:
• Divorce, nullity of marriage, restitution of conjugal rights, and judicial separation.
2. Child Custody and Guardianship:
• Matters related to custody, guardianship, and visitation rights of children.
3. Maintenance Claims:
• Claims under Section 125 of the CrPC and other provisions.
4. Property Disputes:
• Property disputes between spouses or family members.
5. Other Family-Related Matters:
• Adoption, legitimacy of children, and declaration of marital status.
Constitution of Family Courts
1. Family Courts are established by the State Government in consultation with the High Court
under Section 3 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
2. A Family Court Judge is appointed to preside over the court, often with experience in family law.

Special Features of Family Courts

1. Reconciliation and Settlement (Section 9):
• The court must make every effort to settle disputes amicably through conciliation or mediation
before proceeding with the trial.
2. Informal Procedures (Section 10):
• Family Courts are not bound by the strict procedures of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) or Indian
Evidence Act, 1872.
• Proceedings are conducted in a simple and informal manner.

www.prolegalminds.com 23 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3. In-Camera Proceedings (Section 11):

• Family Court proceedings can be held in private to ensure confidentiality, particularly in
sensitive matters like divorce or child custody.
4. Assistance from Counselors:
• The courts may seek help from counselors or experts to facilitate reconciliation and settlements.
5. Exclusive Jurisdiction:
• Family Courts exercise exclusive jurisdiction over family disputes, avoiding duplication of
proceedings.

Advantages of Family Courts

1. Speedy Justice:
• Family Courts aim to deliver quick resolution of family disputes to minimize emotional distress.
2. Informal and Accessible:
• Proceedings are simple and less intimidating for litigants.
3. Promotes Reconciliation:
• Encourages amicable settlements through conciliation and counseling.
4. Confidentiality:
• In-camera proceedings protect the privacy of the parties involved.
5. Cost-Effective:
• Family Courts reduce litigation costs and procedural delays.

Challenges in Family Courts

1. Overburdened Courts:
• Family Courts often face heavy caseloads, leading to delays.
2. Lack of Infrastructure:
• Many Family Courts lack proper facilities and trained personnel.
3. Inadequate Reconciliation Efforts:
• In some cases, reconciliation processes are not followed effectively.
4. Lack of Awareness:
• Litigants, especially women, are often unaware of Family Court mechanisms and procedures.

Landmark Case Laws on Family Courts

1. Shamima Farooqui v. Shahid Khan (2015)
• The Supreme Court emphasized that maintenance granted under family laws must be
reasonable and sufficient to sustain the claimant’s livelihood.
2. K.A. Abdul Jaleel v. T.A. Shahida (2003)
• The Supreme Court held that Family Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over matters relating to
property disputes between spouses.
3. Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999)
• The Court interpreted the term “guardian” under family law, emphasizing equality in parental
rights.
4. Dhurinder Singh v. Kuldip Kaur (2008)
• The Supreme Court upheld that maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC is a statutory
obligation enforceable through Family Courts.

www.prolegalminds.com 24 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Conclusion
Family Courts play a critical role in resolving family and matrimonial disputes by promoting
reconciliation, privacy, and speedy justice. Governed by the Family Courts Act, 1984, these courts
serve as a more accessible and efficient forum for family matters, ensuring minimal emotional
distress and encouraging amicable settlements. Strengthening infrastructure, improving
counseling services, and raising awareness will further enhance their effectiveness in delivering
justice.

17.Section 89.

Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) provides a legal framework for referring
disputes pending in courts to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms. This section was
introduced through the Amendment Act of 1999 to promote amicable settlement of disputes and
reduce the burden on courts.
The objective of Section 89 is to encourage the resolution of disputes outside the formal judicial
system through ADR processes like arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and judicial settlement,
including Lok Adalats.

Text of Section 89

“Settlement of disputes outside the court:

(1) Where it appears to the court that there exist elements of a settlement which may be
acceptable to the parties, the court shall formulate the terms of settlement and give them to the
parties for their observations, and after receiving the observations of the parties, the court may
reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for:
(a) Arbitration;
(b) Conciliation;
(c) Judicial settlement, including settlement through Lok Adalat; or
(d) Mediation.
(2) Where a dispute has been referred—
(a) to arbitration or conciliation, the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 shall
apply as if the proceedings for arbitration or conciliation were referred for settlement under the
provisions of that Act;
(b) to Lok Adalat, the court shall refer the same to the Lok Adalat under the provisions of Section
20(1) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987;
(c) to judicial settlement, the court shall refer the same to a suitable institution or person and such
institution or person shall be deemed to be a Lok Adalat under the provisions of the said Act;
(d) to mediation, the court shall affect a compromise between the parties and shall follow such
procedure as may be prescribed.”

www.prolegalminds.com 25 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Purpose of Section 89
The introduction of Section 89 aims to:
1. Encourage settlement of disputes outside the court.
2. Promote ADR mechanisms as faster and cost-effective alternatives to litigation.
3. Reduce the backlog of cases in courts.
4. Enhance access to justice by offering flexible, informal, and accessible options for dispute
resolution.

Mechanisms Provided under Section 89

1. Arbitration
• A binding process where parties submit disputes to a neutral arbitrator whose decision (award) is
final and enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. Conciliation
• A non-binding process facilitated by a conciliator, governed by Part III of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996. The conciliator helps parties reach a mutually acceptable settlement.
3. Judicial Settlement (Lok Adalat)
• The court refers disputes to Lok Adalats under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 for
settlement through compromise. The decision of the Lok Adalat is binding and enforceable as a
court decree.
4. Mediation
• A voluntary process where a neutral third-party mediator facilitates communication and
negotiation between disputing parties to reach a mutually agreeable solution. It is now governed
by the Mediation Act, 2023.

Procedure under Section 89

1. Identifying Settlement Possibilities:
• The court examines if there is an element of settlement in the dispute.
2. Formulation of Terms:
• The court formulates the terms of a possible settlement and shares them with the parties for
observations.
3. Reformulation of Terms:
• After considering the parties’ observations, the court may reformulate the terms.
4. Referral to ADR:
• The court refers the dispute to one of the ADR mechanisms: arbitration, conciliation, judicial
settlement (Lok Adalat), or mediation.
5. Outcome:
• The settlement reached through ADR is recorded and enforced as a court decree.

Landmark Case Laws on Section 89

1. Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005)

• The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 89 and emphasized the
importance of ADR mechanisms in delivering quick and inexpensive justice.
• The Court also directed the framing of mediation rules for better implementation.

www.prolegalminds.com 26 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2. Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (2010)

• The Supreme Court clarified that Section 89 applies to cases where the dispute is capable of
being settled through ADR.
• The Court provided guidelines for choosing the appropriate ADR method based on the nature of
the dispute.
3. B.S. Krishnamurthy v. B.S. Nagaraj (2010)
• The Court held that matrimonial disputes should first be referred to mediation before
adjudication to preserve family relationships.
4. K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa (2013)
• The Court emphasized mandatory mediation in matrimonial disputes to avoid adversarial
litigation.

Significance of Section 89
1. Promotes ADR:
• Encourages parties to resolve disputes amicably through ADR mechanisms.
2. Reduces Court Backlog:
• Helps in reducing the burden on courts by diverting cases to alternative forums.
3. Cost-Effective and Time-Saving:
• ADR is faster, more flexible, and less expensive compared to traditional litigation.
4. Preserves Relationships:
• ADR methods like mediation and conciliation promote reconciliation and avoid adversarial
outcomes.

Challenges in Implementation
1. Lack of Awareness:
• Many litigants and lawyers are unaware of ADR mechanisms.
2. Infrastructure Gaps:
• Inadequate infrastructure for mediation and conciliation centers.
3. Reluctance by Courts and Lawyers:
• Some courts and lawyers still prefer traditional litigation over ADR.
4. Non-Compliance with Timeframes:
• Delays in referral and completion of ADR proceedings.

Conclusion
Section 89 of the CPC is a landmark provision that promotes the use of Alternative Dispute
Resolution (ADR) for out-of-court settlements. It plays a significant role in reducing the backlog
of cases in courts, ensuring speedy and cost-effective justice, and fostering amicable resolutions.
Strengthening ADR infrastructure and increasing awareness will further enhance its effectiveness
in delivering justice.

www.prolegalminds.com 27 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

18.Advantages of ADR

Introduction
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to mechanisms for resolving disputes outside
traditional court proceedings. ADR includes methods such as Arbitration, Mediation, Conciliation,
Negotiation, and Judicial Settlement (Lok Adalats). These mechanisms offer a faster, cost-
effective, and flexible approach to dispute resolution while preserving relationships between
parties.
The legal framework in India for ADR includes:
• Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
• Mediation Act, 2023.
• Section 89 of the CPC, 1908.
• Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (for Lok Adalats).

Advantages of ADR
1. Speedy Resolution
• ADR resolves disputes much faster compared to traditional court litigation, which often takes
years.
• Example: Arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has a defined timeline of
12 months under Section 29A.
2. Cost-Effective
• ADR methods, such as mediation and conciliation, save substantial legal and administrative
expenses for parties.
• No court fees are required in ADR forums like Lok Adalats.
3. Flexibility of Process
• ADR allows parties to determine the procedure, venue, time, and rules for dispute resolution.
• Unlike courts, it does not strictly adhere to procedural laws like the CPC or Evidence Act.
4. Confidentiality
• Proceedings in ADR, particularly mediation and conciliation, are confidential.
• This ensures that sensitive information is protected, unlike public court hearings.
• Section 22 of the Mediation Act, 2023 guarantees confidentiality in mediation.
5. Preservation of Relationships
• ADR focuses on compromise and mutual agreement rather than adversarial litigation.
• It is particularly useful in family disputes, business conflicts, and employment issues where
maintaining relationships is crucial.
6. Party Autonomy
• Parties in ADR have the freedom to choose:
• The procedure to be followed.
• Arbitrators or mediators of their choice.
• The applicable law and venue for arbitration.

www.prolegalminds.com 28 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

7. Expertise in Resolution
• Arbitrators and mediators are often experts in their fields, such as law, construction, or finance,
ensuring specialized resolution of disputes.
• Example: Arbitrators in construction disputes often have engineering expertise.
8. Reduced Burden on Courts
• ADR helps reduce the backlog of cases in courts, enabling the judiciary to focus on more
complex matters.
• Section 89 of the CPC, 1908 mandates courts to refer disputes for settlement through ADR.
9. Enforceability of Awards and Settlements
• Arbitral awards and conciliation settlements are binding and enforceable as court decrees.
• Section 74 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 makes settlement agreements legally
binding.
10. Informal and Accessible
• ADR processes are informal, less intimidating, and accessible to parties compared to traditional
courtrooms.
• Lok Adalats are especially effective in rural areas where legal awareness may be low.
11. Customizable Solutions
• ADR methods allow parties to craft creative and mutually acceptable solutions, which may not
always be possible in court judgments.

Special Significance of ADR in India

1. Mediation Act, 2023:
• Introduced pre-litigation mediation as mandatory for certain civil and commercial disputes to
promote ADR.
2. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987:
• Lok Adalats provide quick and affordable dispute resolution, particularly for the underprivileged.
3. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
• Ensures enforceable and final arbitral awards while promoting international arbitration.

Examples of ADR in Action

1. Commercial Disputes:
• Large corporations prefer arbitration to resolve high-stakes disputes efficiently.
• Example: Settlement of commercial contracts through institutional arbitration (e.g., SIAC, ICC).
2. Family Disputes:
• Mediation helps resolve matrimonial disputes amicably, preserving family relationships.
• Example: Custody or maintenance disputes settled under Family Courts Act, 1984.
3. Motor Accident Claims:
• Lok Adalats play a vital role in settling motor accident compensation claims under the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.

www.prolegalminds.com 29 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Challenges Despite the Advantages

1. Lack of Awareness:
• Many people, especially in rural areas, are unaware of ADR mechanisms.
2. Implementation Issues:
• Delays in arbitration and enforcement dilute the benefits of ADR.
3. Quality of Mediators/Arbitrators:
• Inadequately trained ADR professionals may affect the fairness and quality of outcomes.
Conclusion
ADR offers significant advantages over traditional court litigation, including speed, cost-
effectiveness, confidentiality, and preservation of relationships. By reducing the burden on courts
and promoting amicable settlements, ADR has emerged as an essential component of India’s
justice delivery system. Strengthening ADR mechanisms through awareness, infrastructure
development, and the latest legal reforms, such as the Mediation Act, 2023, will ensure greater
access to justice for all.

19.ODR

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Comprehensive Overview

Introduction to ODR
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is a technology-driven mechanism for resolving disputes outside
traditional courts through digital platforms. It integrates Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
processes such as mediation, arbitration, negotiation, and conciliation with digital tools to enable
faster, cost-effective, and efficient dispute resolution.
ODR is particularly useful for resolving commercial disputes, e-commerce grievances,
contractual issues, and cross-border disputes.

Legal Framework for ODR in India

1. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
• Provides the statutory framework for arbitration, conciliation, and enforceability of agreements,
including awards rendered through online arbitration.
2. Information Technology Act, 2000:
• Recognizes electronic records, digital signatures, and communication, enabling legally valid
online agreements and processes.
3. Mediation Act, 2023:
• Promotes online mediation as an integral part of dispute resolution. Pre-litigation mediation can
now be conducted through online platforms.
4. Section 89 of the CPC, 1908:
• Permits courts to refer disputes for resolution through ADR mechanisms, including online
platforms.
5. Consumer Protection Act, 2019:
• Recognizes ODR to resolve consumer disputes efficiently, especially for e-commerce
transactions.

www.prolegalminds.com 30 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

How ODR Works

ODR combines ADR mechanisms (arbitration, mediation, conciliation, negotiation) with digital
tools to resolve disputes. Key steps include:
1. Filing a Complaint:
• Parties submit their dispute digitally on an ODR platform.
2. Virtual Communication:
• Proceedings are conducted through emails, video conferencing, chatbots, and other virtual tools.
3. Submission of Documents:
• Evidence and statements are submitted electronically.
4. Dispute Resolution Process:
• Mediation, arbitration, or conciliation is facilitated by a neutral third-party expert, often using
ODR-specific tools.
5. Issuance of Award/Settlement:
• The award, settlement, or agreement is rendered digitally and signed electronically, ensuring
enforceability.

Key Features of ODR

1. Remote Participation:
• Parties can participate from anywhere, making it accessible for individuals, businesses, and
cross-border disputes.
2. Technology Integration:
• Use of video conferencing, chat systems, digital signatures, and blockchain to ensure secure and
transparent proceedings.
3. Cost-Effective and Fast:
• Eliminates travel, paperwork, and formal court delays.
4. Neutrality and Transparency:
• Platforms ensure impartiality through neutral third-party facilitators and secure technology
systems.
5. Scalable for High Volume Disputes:
• Especially useful for e-commerce and consumer disputes where a large number of claims arise.

Advantages of ODR
1. Accessibility:
• Dispute resolution becomes available to individuals and businesses irrespective of their location.
2. Time and Cost Efficiency:
• Reduces the cost and time of resolving disputes compared to traditional courts.
3. Convenience:
• Parties can engage in proceedings at their convenience via virtual platforms.
4. Paperless Process:
• Documents, submissions, and evidence are shared electronically, promoting sustainability.
5. Enhanced Security:
• Digital platforms provide secure communication through encryption and blockchain
technologies.

www.prolegalminds.com 31 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Significance of ODR in Post-Pandemic Era

1. Impact of COVID-19:
• Court closures during the pandemic accelerated the adoption of ODR as a reliable solution for
dispute resolution.
2. Ease of Commercial Disputes:
• Businesses increasingly prefer ODR for contract enforcement and B2B disputes.
3. Virtual Courts:
• The Indian judiciary has also adopted virtual court hearings, setting a precedent for technology-
driven justice delivery.
Case Laws and References
1. Trimex International FZE Ltd. v. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd. (2010)
• The Supreme Court held that contracts and agreements executed digitally are valid under the IT
Act, 2000, which also applies to ODR.
2. Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd. v. Kola Shipping Ltd. (2009)
• The Court acknowledged arbitration agreements made through electronic means, reinforcing
their validity for ODR.
3. NITI Aayog Report on ODR (2020)
• Highlighted the importance of adopting ODR mechanisms to resolve commercial disputes
efficiently.

Conclusion
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is a transformative mechanism that combines technology and
ADR processes to deliver efficient, accessible, and cost-effective dispute resolution. By
overcoming geographical, time, and procedural barriers, ODR is particularly significant for
resolving commercial, consumer, and cross-border disputes. Strengthening the legal framework,
bridging the digital divide, and raising awareness will ensure that ODR becomes a cornerstone of
India’s justice delivery system in the digital age.

20.Termination Of proceeding.

Termination of Proceedings in Arbitration

Introduction
The termination of proceedings refers to the conclusion of arbitration or conciliation proceedings
under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It signifies the formal closure of the dispute
resolution process, either through an arbitral award, settlement, or other valid grounds.
Termination ensures clarity on the finality of proceedings and protects parties from unnecessary
prolongation of the dispute.

Termination of Arbitral Proceedings

The provisions for termination of arbitral proceedings are covered under Section 32 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

www.prolegalminds.com 32 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

1. Modes of Termination of Arbitral Proceedings (Section 32)

Section 32(1) specifies two primary ways in which arbitral proceedings are terminated:
1. By Final Arbitral Award
• When the arbitral tribunal makes a final award on the issues submitted to arbitration, the
proceedings come to an end.
• The award disposes of all claims and counterclaims referred to arbitration.
• Example: Award for monetary compensation, declaratory relief, or dismissal of claims.
2. By an Order of the Arbitral Tribunal
• The tribunal may terminate the proceedings without making a final award under the following
circumstances (Section 32(2)):
• (a) Withdrawal of Claim:
• If the claimant withdraws their claim and the respondent does not object.
• Exception: The respondent may object if they have a legitimate interest in obtaining a final
award.
• (b) Impossibility of Continuation:
• If the tribunal finds that the continuation of proceedings has become unnecessary or impossible
(e.g., parties fail to cooperate, lack of jurisdiction).
• (c) Settlement Between Parties:
• When parties agree to settle their dispute through mediation, conciliation, or negotiation, and a
consent award is recorded under Section 30.

2. Effects of Termination of Proceedings

1. End of Tribunal’s Authority:
• After termination, the arbitral tribunal has no further authority over the dispute.
2. Finality of Award:
• The award becomes final and binding unless challenged under Section 34 (for domestic
arbitration) or enforced as per Section 36.
3. Closure of Claims:
• Claims and counterclaims stand resolved, and fresh arbitration cannot be initiated on the same
subject matter.
Termination in Conciliation Proceedings
Termination of conciliation proceedings is governed by Section 76 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996**.

Modes of Termination (Section 76)

1. Settlement Agreement:
• Conciliation proceedings terminate when a settlement agreement is signed by the parties and
the conciliator under Section 73.
2. Declaration by the Conciliator:
• The conciliator may declare the proceedings terminated if they find that further efforts to
resolve the dispute will be fruitless.
3. Written Declaration by a Party:
• If one party submits a written declaration to the conciliator stating their intention to terminate
the proceedings.
4. Non-Participation:
• If a party fails to cooperate, proceedings can be terminated.

www.prolegalminds.com 33 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Differences Between Arbitration and Conciliation Termination

Aspect Arbitration Conciliation
Legal Provision Section 32 Section 76
Outcome Final Award or Tribunal Order Settlement Agreement or Termination Notice
Authority Tribunal terminates proceedings Conciliator or Parties terminate proceedings
Nature of Closure Binding award enforceable as a court decree Settlement has binding effect on
parties
Landmark Case Laws on Termination of Proceedings
1. K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi (1998)
• The Supreme Court held that an arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction ends once the proceedings are
terminated by a final award.
2. Union of India v. M/s Popular Construction Co. (2001)
• The Court emphasized that after termination, the tribunal cannot revisit the proceedings unless
permitted under the Act.
3. N.B.C.C. v. J.G. Engineering (2010)
• Held that if proceedings cannot continue due to impossibility (e.g., lack of cooperation), the
tribunal can terminate them under Section 32(2)(b).
4. Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of Maharashtra (2000)
• Highlighted the binding nature of termination through consent awards in conciliation
proceedings.

Conclusion
Termination of arbitral and conciliation proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996 provides clarity and finality to the dispute resolution process. While arbitration concludes
through a final award or tribunal order, conciliation terminates through mutual settlement or
declaration. The binding and enforceable nature of termination ensures that parties can achieve
closure to their disputes efficiently and effectively.

21.Arbitral Tribunal.
An Arbitral Tribunal is a neutral body of one or more arbitrators appointed to resolve disputes
submitted to arbitration. It functions as a private adjudicating authority empowered to render a
binding decision known as an arbitral award. The concept of an arbitral tribunal is central to the
arbitration process under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which governs domestic and
international arbitration in India.

Definition
As per Section 2(1)(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
“An ‘arbitral tribunal’ means a sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators.”
The tribunal’s primary role is to adjudicate disputes, ensuring fairness, impartiality, and adherence
to the principles of natural justice.
Composition of Arbitral Tribunal (Section 10)
1. Number of Arbitrators:
• Parties are free to agree on the number of arbitrators.
• If no agreement exists, Section 10(2) provides for a sole arbitrator by default.
• The tribunal can consist of any odd number of arbitrators (e.g., one, three, or five) to avoid
deadlocks.

www.prolegalminds.com 34 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2. Appointment of Arbitrators (Section 11):

• Parties can agree on the procedure for appointing arbitrators.
• If parties fail to agree:
• For a sole arbitrator, the appointment is made by the court.
• For a three-member tribunal, each party appoints one arbitrator, and the two arbitrators appoint
the presiding arbitrator.
• In international commercial arbitration, the Supreme Court or designated authority appoints
arbitrators.

Qualifications of Arbitrators
1. Independence and Impartiality:
• Arbitrators must act independently without bias.
• Schedule V and Schedule VII of the Act provide grounds for assessing impartiality and conflicts
of interest.
2. Expertise:
• Arbitrators are often chosen based on their expertise in the subject matter (e.g., law,
engineering, commerce).
Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal
1. Competence-Competence Principle (Section 16):
• The tribunal has the power to determine its own jurisdiction, including objections related to the
existence or validity of the arbitration agreement.
2. Scope of Jurisdiction:
• The tribunal decides only the matters referred to it by the parties under the arbitration
agreement.

Powers of the Arbitral Tribunal

The powers of an arbitral tribunal are outlined under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
1. Determining Procedure (Section 19):
• The tribunal is not bound by the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
• Parties are free to agree on the procedure; otherwise, the tribunal decides it.
2. Interim Measures (Section 17):
• The tribunal can grant interim reliefs such as:
• Preservation of property.
• Appointment of a receiver.
• Security for the amount in dispute.
3. Equal Treatment of Parties (Section 18):
• The tribunal must ensure all parties are treated fairly and given equal opportunity to present
their case.
4. Conducting Hearings (Section 24):
• The tribunal conducts oral hearings or decides matters on written submissions based on party
agreement.
5. Summoning Evidence:
• The tribunal can summon witnesses, require the production of documents, and inspect property
related to the dispute.
6. Passing an Arbitral Award (Section 31):
• The tribunal delivers a binding decision based on the merits of the dispute.

www.prolegalminds.com 35 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Termination of Arbitrator’s Mandate (Section 14 and 15)

1. The mandate of an arbitrator terminates if:
• They fail to act without undue delay.
• They become unable to perform their duties due to physical or legal incapacity.
• They withdraw or are removed for valid reasons.
Challenges to the Arbitral Tribunal
Under Section 12 and 13, parties can challenge the appointment of an arbitrator on the following
grounds:
1. Conflict of Interest:
• Any personal or financial interest that may affect impartiality.
2. Lack of Independence:
• Relationships with parties, witnesses, or legal counsel.
3. Qualifications:
• Failure to meet the qualifications agreed upon by the parties.

Powers to Rule on its Award

1. Interim Awards:
• The tribunal can issue interim awards before the final award is passed.
2. Final Awards:
• The tribunal issues a conclusive arbitral award that resolves the dispute.
3. Correction and Interpretation of Award (Section 33):
• Parties may request corrections of typographical errors or seek clarification on specific points in
the award.
Advantages of Arbitral Tribunal
1. Expertise:
• Parties can choose arbitrators with technical expertise relevant to their disputes.
2. Efficiency:
• Flexible procedures allow faster resolution compared to traditional courts.
3. Neutrality:
• Parties can ensure impartiality and avoid jurisdictional biases in international arbitration.
4. Confidentiality:
• Arbitral proceedings are private and confidential, unlike court cases.
5. Binding Nature:
• The tribunal’s award is final and enforceable as a court decree under Section 36.

Landmark Case Laws on Arbitral Tribunal

1. K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi (1998)
• The Supreme Court clarified the role and authority of an arbitral tribunal, stating that arbitration
ensures binding decisions through a chosen forum.
2. Fertilizer Corporation of India v. Indian Union (1981)
• The Court emphasized the impartial role of arbitrators and the binding nature of awards.
3. Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd. (2019)
• The Supreme Court held that arbitrators must meet the qualifications specified in the arbitration
agreement.
4. HRD Corporation v. GAIL (India) Ltd. (2018)
• Highlighted the importance of impartiality and independence of arbitrators as per Schedule V
and Schedule VII of the Act.

www.prolegalminds.com 36 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Conclusion

The Arbitral Tribunal plays a central role in the arbitration process under the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996. By ensuring impartiality, flexibility, and expertise, the tribunal provides an
efficient alternative to traditional court litigation. Its decisions, known as arbitral awards, are
binding and enforceable, contributing to the growth of ADR in India and promoting speedy and
effective dispute resolution.

22.Termination of Arbitrator

Introduction
The termination of an arbitrator’s mandate refers to the cessation of the arbitrator’s authority to
act in an arbitration proceeding. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides specific
grounds and procedures for terminating the mandate of an arbitrator to ensure fairness,
impartiality, and efficiency in arbitration proceedings.
The termination can occur voluntarily, by agreement, or under specific circumstances as outlined
in the Act.

Relevant Provisions
The termination of an arbitrator is governed by the following sections of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996:

1. Section 14: Termination of the mandate of an arbitrator.

2. Section 15: Substitution of an arbitrator.
Grounds for Termination of an Arbitrator (Section 14)
An arbitrator’s mandate terminates under the following circumstances:
1. Failure to Act Without Undue Delay
• If the arbitrator fails to perform their duties promptly, causing unnecessary delays in the
proceedings.
• Example: Repeated absence from hearings, failure to deliver an award within the stipulated time
frame under Section 29A.
2. Incapacity or Inability to Act
• If the arbitrator becomes physically or legally incapable of performing their duties.
• Example:
• Medical incapacity.
• Legal disqualification, such as a conflict of interest arising under Schedule V or VII of the Act.
3. Withdrawal by the Arbitrator
• An arbitrator may voluntarily withdraw from their role, either due to personal reasons or
circumstances affecting their impartiality.
4. Mutual Agreement by Parties
• The parties may mutually agree to terminate the arbitrator’s mandate.
5. Challenge to Arbitrator’s Appointment (Section 13)
• If a challenge to the arbitrator’s independence, impartiality, or qualifications is upheld, the
arbitrator’s mandate is terminated.

www.prolegalminds.com 37 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Procedure for Termination of Arbitrator

1. Mutual Agreement or Withdrawal
• The parties or the arbitrator can agree to terminate the mandate amicably.
2. Court Intervention
• If there is a dispute regarding the termination under Section 14(2), the aggrieved party can
approach the court for a decision.
3. Challenge Procedure
• The challenge to the arbitrator’s mandate is made under Section 13.
• If the arbitrator fails to withdraw after being challenged, the arbitral tribunal continues the
proceedings, and the party raising the challenge can apply to the court after the award is made.
Substitution of Arbitrator (Section 15)
When an arbitrator’s mandate is terminated, the Act provides for the substitution of the arbitrator
to ensure the continuity of proceedings.
1. Procedure for Substitution:
• A substitute arbitrator is appointed in accordance with the rules and procedure applicable to the
original appointment under Section 11.
2. Effect on Proceedings:
• The substituted arbitrator may proceed from the stage where the previous arbitrator left, unless
the parties agree otherwise.
• This ensures that the proceedings are not invalidated or delayed unnecessarily.

Impact of Termination of Arbitrator

1. Ensures Fairness and Impartiality
• Termination prevents biased or unqualified arbitrators from continuing the proceedings.
2. Continuity of Proceedings
• Appointment of a substitute arbitrator ensures that arbitration proceedings remain unaffected
and proceed without delay.
3. Judicial Intervention
• Courts can intervene only to resolve disputes about the validity of termination, maintaining a
balance between party autonomy and judicial oversight.

Case Laws on Termination of Arbitrator

1. Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd. (2019)
• The Supreme Court held that an arbitrator’s mandate automatically terminates if they become
ineligible under Schedule VII of the Act.
2. HRD Corporation v. GAIL (India) Ltd. (2018)
• The Court emphasized the importance of impartiality and stated that an arbitrator must
withdraw when legitimate doubts about independence arise.
3. TRF Ltd. v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. (2017)
• The Court ruled that if an arbitrator becomes ineligible to act, they cannot even appoint a
substitute arbitrator.
4. Perkins Eastman Architects v. HSCC (India) Ltd. (2019)
• The Court held that an arbitrator who is disqualified under Schedule VII cannot continue, and
their mandate stands terminated.

www.prolegalminds.com 38 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Conclusion
The termination of an arbitrator ensures that arbitration proceedings remain impartial, efficient,
and free from undue delays. Provisions under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 provide a structured framework for the termination and substitution of
arbitrators, protecting the rights of parties while maintaining the integrity of arbitration. Judicial
intervention is minimal, promoting party autonomy and ensuring smooth progress of proceedings.

23.Powers of Conciliator

Introduction
A Conciliator is a neutral third party appointed to facilitate amicable settlement between
disputing parties through conciliation, a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Unlike
arbitrators, conciliators do not impose decisions but assist the parties in reaching a mutually
acceptable agreement.
The powers and functions of a conciliator are defined under Part III (Sections 61 to 81) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which incorporates principles of the UNCITRAL
Conciliation Rules.

Role and Objectives of a Conciliator

• Facilitate communication and understanding between parties.
• Identify the underlying interests of the parties.
• Propose solutions and options for settlement.
• Assist parties in drafting a mutually agreeable settlement agreement.

Powers of the Conciliator

The conciliator’s powers are primarily governed by Sections 67 to 76 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996.
1. Power to Conduct Conciliation Proceedings Flexibly (Section 67)
• The conciliator has the freedom to conduct proceedings in a manner they consider appropriate,
without being bound by the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
• The procedure is informal and can be adapted to the specific needs of the parties.
Example: The conciliator may conduct joint or separate meetings with the parties.
2. Power to Facilitate Communication
• The conciliator has the power to facilitate communication between parties, including:
• Clarifying misunderstandings.
• Ensuring parties communicate their positions clearly.
• Helping parties understand each other’s interests and concerns.
3. Power to Request Information and Documents (Section 70)
• The conciliator may request parties to submit statements, documents, or evidence explaining
their case.
• Parties are obligated to cooperate and share information necessary for settlement discussions.
4. Power to Make Settlement Proposals (Section 67(4))
• At any stage of the proceedings, the conciliator can propose terms of settlement.
• The proposals may be written or oral and need not be based solely on legal merits.
Example: A conciliator in a commercial dispute may propose an installment-based payment
schedule as a compromise.

www.prolegalminds.com 39 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

5. Power to Hold Private Meetings (Caucuses)

• The conciliator can meet with each party separately to understand their concerns and interests.
• Information shared during private meetings must be kept confidential unless explicitly
permitted to disclose by the party.
6. Power to Maintain Confidentiality (Section 75)
• The conciliator has the duty and power to ensure confidentiality of all matters related to the
proceedings.
• This includes documents, discussions, and proposals.
7. Power to Draft and Assist in Settlement Agreement (Section 73)
• If parties agree to a settlement, the conciliator assists in drafting a settlement agreement.
• The agreement must be signed by the parties and the conciliator, and it has the same effect as
an arbitral award under Section 74.
8. Power to Terminate Conciliation Proceedings (Section 76)
• The conciliator can terminate proceedings in the following circumstances:
• Upon signing of a settlement agreement.
• If they declare that further efforts are fruitless.
• Upon written declaration of termination by one party.
9. Power to Act Independently and Impartially
• The conciliator must remain independent and impartial throughout the process.
• They have the discretion to avoid procedural formalities and focus on the interests of both
parties.

Duties and Limitations of Conciliator

1. Impartiality and Independence:
• A conciliator must act fairly and neutrally without any bias.
2. No Adjudicatory Powers:
• Unlike arbitrators, conciliators cannot impose a decision on the parties. Their role is purely
facilitative.
3. No Evidence in Court (Section 81):
• Statements, admissions, or proposals made during conciliation cannot be used as evidence in
subsequent legal proceedings.

Advantages of the Conciliator’s Powers

1. Flexibility:
• The conciliator can adapt the procedure to the specific needs of the dispute.
2. Confidentiality:
• Ensures open and honest discussions without fear of disclosure.
3. Preservation of Relationships:
• Conciliators focus on resolving disputes amicably, preserving relationships between the parties.
4. Cost and Time Efficiency:
• Conciliators’ powers ensure quick resolution without formalities of litigation.
5. Creative Solutions:
• By proposing innovative and interest-based solutions, conciliators can achieve outcomes beyond
legal remedies.

www.prolegalminds.com 40 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Case Laws on Powers of Conciliator

1. Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of Maharashtra (2000)
• The Supreme Court upheld the binding nature of settlement agreements drafted under
conciliation, recognizing the conciliator’s role in facilitating settlement.
2. Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005)
• The Court emphasized the importance of ADR mechanisms, including conciliation, and the
conciliator’s role in promoting settlement.
3. B.S. Krishnamurthy v. B.S. Nagaraj (2010)
• Highlighted the conciliator’s power to propose flexible and interest-based solutions for
matrimonial disputes.
Conclusion
The powers of a conciliator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ensure that disputes
are resolved in a flexible, amicable, and interest-based manner. By facilitating communication,
proposing settlements, and ensuring confidentiality, conciliators play a vital role in promoting ADR
as a reliable and efficient alternative to litigation. Their powers empower them to create practical
and innovative solutions while preserving relationships and ensuring speedy dispute resolution.

24.interim Award
I
An Interim Award is a temporary or provisional decision issued by an arbitral tribunal during the
arbitration proceedings to address specific issues or disputes that arise before the final arbitral
award. The purpose of an interim award is to preserve the rights of the parties, ensure procedural
fairness, and facilitate the smooth progress of arbitration.
Interim awards are enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and play a
significant role in protecting the interests of parties during the pendency of proceedings.

Legal Framework for Interim Award

The concept and enforceability of interim awards are provided under:
1. Section 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
• Allows an arbitral tribunal to make an interim award on any matter which can be decided as part
of the final award.
2. Section 2(1)(c):
• Defines an arbitral award to include an interim award.

Definition of Interim Award

An interim award is a partial decision by the tribunal that resolves specific matters in dispute
before the issuance of the final award.
Example: Granting interim relief like security for claims, preservation of assets, or determining a
part of the claim before the conclusion of arbitration.

www.prolegalminds.com 41 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Scope of Interim Award

An interim award can be issued for:
1. Part of the Dispute:
• Adjudicating some claims, counterclaims, or defenses while other parts remain pending.
2. Interim Reliefs:
• Protecting the subject matter of the dispute.
• Ordering the preservation or interim custody of property.
3. Costs and Expenses:
• Addressing costs incurred during specific stages of arbitration.
4. Admission of Liability:
• Determining liability for certain claims without deciding on the quantum of damages.

Key Features of Interim Award

1. Binding Nature:
• Interim awards are binding on the parties and enforceable like a final award.
2. Partial Decision:
• It addresses specific issues but does not conclude the entire arbitration.
3. Finality of Matters Decided:
• The issues decided in an interim award cannot be re-litigated in the final award unless appealed.
4. Enforceability:
• Interim awards can be enforced as a court decree under Section 36.

Powers of Arbitral Tribunal to Issue Interim Awards

1. Section 31(6): Making an Interim Award
• The tribunal can make an interim award on any matter that can be finally decided at the
conclusion of proceedings.
2. Scope of Relief:
• The tribunal can issue interim relief such as:
• Securing the amount in dispute.
• Preservation or protection of property involved in arbitration.
• Maintenance of the status quo.
3. Part of Final Award:
• Interim awards form part of the final decision and contribute to the smooth conclusion of
arbitration.
Enforcement of Interim Awards
• Interim awards are enforceable under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996**.
• They can be enforced as a decree of the court, ensuring compliance by the parties.
Grounds for Challenging Interim Awards
Interim awards can be challenged under Section 34 on the following grounds:
1. Lack of Jurisdiction:
• The tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction while issuing the interim award.
2. Violation of Natural Justice:
• If parties were not given proper notice or an opportunity to present their case.
3. Conflict with Public Policy:
• The award is in contravention of Indian public policy (e.g., fraud, corruption).
4. Patent Illegality:
• Applicable to domestic awards under Section 34.

www.prolegalminds.com 42 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-A ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Difference Between Interim and Final Award

Aspect Interim Award Final Award
Nature Temporary or partial resolution of issues. Conclusive decision on all disputes.
Enforceability Enforceable like a decree. Fully enforceable as a final decision.
Scope Limited to specific matters or reliefs. Resolves all claims, counterclaims, etc.
Appeal Can be challenged under Section 34. Finality with minimal grounds for challenge.

Advantages of Interim Award

1. Protects Parties’ Interests:
• Ensures the preservation of assets or maintenance of status quo.
2. Partial Resolution:
• Resolves certain disputes early, narrowing the issues for the final award.
3. Efficient Proceedings:
• Facilitates smoother arbitration by addressing urgent or critical issues.
4. Time-Saving:
• Reduces delays by resolving preliminary or uncontested matters.
5. Binding and Enforceable:
• Interim awards carry the same legal force as final awards.

Landmark Case Laws on Interim Awards

1. McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. (2006)
• The Supreme Court held that interim awards are enforceable like final awards and form part of
the arbitral process.
2. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Amritsar Gas Service (1991)
• Clarified that partial awards resolving specific claims are valid under arbitration law.
3. Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. NEPC India Ltd. (1999)
• Highlighted the tribunal’s power to grant interim measures and ensure effective arbitration
proceedings.
4. ONGC v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003)
• The Supreme Court stated that interim awards are subject to challenge under Section 34 on the
grounds of public policy.

Conclusion
An Interim Award is an essential tool in arbitration, allowing the tribunal to resolve specific
matters and provide interim reliefs during the pendency of proceedings. It ensures protection of
parties’ interests, streamlines the arbitration process, and facilitates efficient dispute resolution.
Governed by Section 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, interim awards are
enforceable and binding, thereby promoting fairness and effectiveness in arbitration.

www.prolegalminds.com 43 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER-1V

ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

PART B- QUESTION

1. Explain the characteristics of ADR? Distinguish between arbitration and negotiation.

2. What are the Salient features of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of alternative dispute resolution?4. Tribunals
4. Under what grounds an award of the Arbitrator can be set aside? Discuss.
5. Explain the powers and function of Conciliators
6. What a note on the finality and enforcement of Arbitral Award?
7. Discuss the importance of Sec 89 of the code of Civil Procedure code 1908 for settlement of
disputes outside the court.
8. Explain the procedure for enforcement of Foreign Award?
9. Discuss the composite functions of family court?
10. What is the role played by Lokpal and Lokayukta in administration of justice in India?
11.Write in brief the procedure followed to appoint and remove Arbitrator.
12. Explain the working of Lok Adalats in the speedy disposal of long pending cases in the civil
courts.
13. Define mediation enhances access to Justice.
14. Write about section 89 and order X Rules 1A,1B and 1C of CPC.
15. ADR under different laws in India
16. Arbitration Council of India (ACI)
17.International Commercial Arbitration Uncitral Model law on International commercial
Arbitration, 1985.
18. Geneva Convention 19275. Explain the powers and function of Conciliators.
19. New York Convention 1958
20. Recognition and enforcement of foreign award
21. Uncitral Model Law on international commercial mediation and International Settlement
agreements resulting from MEDIATION, 2018.
22. Dispute resolution
23. Singapore Convention on Mediation , 2019.
24.What is mediation? Explain the advantages and disadvantages of mediation.
25.What are the advantages and disadvantages of ADR system?
26.1.What is the jurisdiction of the Family Courts? Are the Advocates allowed to represent¿t 0.
litigants at these Courts?

44
 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

1. Explain the characteristics of ADR? Distinguish between arbitration and

negotiation.

1. Characteristics of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) encompasses various techniques used to resolve disputes
outside of traditional court proceedings. ADR methods, including arbitration, mediation,
negotiation, and conciliation, are characterized by specific features that make them a preferred
choice in many cases:
• Voluntary Participation: In most ADR methods, parties voluntarily agree to participate in the
process. This voluntary nature fosters cooperation and a mutual willingness to resolve disputes.
• Confidentiality: ADR processes are generally private, ensuring that the details of the dispute,
evidence presented, and settlement terms remain confidential, unlike in court proceedings, which
are public.
• Flexibility and Informality: ADR proceedings are typically more flexible and informal than
traditional litigation. Parties can customize the procedure to suit their specific needs, adjusting
rules, timelines, and methods.
• Cost-Effectiveness: ADR is often less costly than court litigation due to reduced procedural
formalities, shorter timelines, and flexibility in handling the dispute.
• Speed: ADR methods allow for faster resolution of disputes. Procedures are streamlined, and in
methods like mediation or negotiation, there may be no formal hearings, reducing time.
• Preservation of Relationships: ADR methods such as mediation and negotiation are
collaborative in nature, focusing on mutual understanding. This is beneficial in situations where
the parties have ongoing relationships, such as in business or family matters.
• Control over the Outcome: In processes like negotiation and mediation, the parties retain control
over the outcome. Unlike court judgments, which are imposed by a judge, ADR methods encourage
parties to reach mutually acceptable agreements.
• Binding vs. Non-Binding: Some ADR methods, like arbitration, are binding, meaning the decision
is enforceable in court. Others, such as negotiation and mediation, are non-binding unless parties
formalize the agreement in writing.

2. Distinction between Arbitration and Negotiation

Feature Arbitration Negotiation
Definition A formal process where parties submit their dispute to a neutral arbitrator who makes a
binding decision. Governed by laws and a defined procedure. An informal discussion process
where parties try to reach a mutually agreeable solution without third-party intervention.
Third Party Involvement Yes, involves a neutral arbitrator (or arbitrators) who makes a binding
decision. No third party is involved; parties communicate directly to reach an agreement.
Legal Framework Governed by statutory laws, such as the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Arbitrator’s decision is enforceable as a court decree. No specific legal framework. It is a private
and voluntary process that is non-binding unless formalized in a written agreement.
Binding Nature Binding: The arbitrator’s award is final and enforceable in court, similar to a
judicial ruling. Non-binding unless the parties reach a formal agreement. It is only enforceable if
both parties sign a written agreement.

www.prolegalminds.com 45 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Procedure More formal and structured with specific procedures for filing claims, presenting
evidence, and making arguments. Highly informal with no fixed procedure. Parties decide how and
when to meet, discuss, and resolve issues.
Role of Parties Limited control over the final outcome, as the arbitrator makes the decision based
on evidence and arguments. Full control over the outcome, as parties negotiate and mutually
agree on the terms.
Cost and Time Generally more costly and time-consuming than negotiation, though still faster and
less expensive than court litigation. Typically the least costly and fastest form of ADR due to the
lack of procedural formality and third-party fees.
Examples Used in commercial contracts, employment disputes, and international trade
agreements. Common in cases where parties want a final, enforceable decision but prefer to avoid
litigation. Used in business negotiations, employment salary discussions, and settlement of minor
disputes. Suitable for cases requiring ongoing relationships.
Examples
• Arbitration: A dispute between a contractor and a client over a construction contract may be
resolved through arbitration. Both parties present their evidence and arguments to an arbitrator
who makes a binding decision on compensation or other resolutions.
• Negotiation: In a business dispute between two companies over shared resources, the
companies’ representatives may negotiate directly, discussing needs and expectations to reach a
solution that benefits both parties.

Reference Case Laws

• M/S Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. & Anr v. Rani Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2002): The Supreme
Court discussed the nature of arbitration as a binding ADR method, stating that an arbitrator’s
decision has the same enforceability as a court decree, underscoring the importance of arbitration
for enforceable resolutions.
• Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005): The Supreme Court encouraged ADR
methods, including negotiation, as valuable tools to reduce case backlog and foster dispute
resolution outside of court, especially in cases requiring faster and less formal processes.

Conclusion
ADR offers a spectrum of methods that cater to different needs in dispute resolution. Arbitration
provides a structured, binding process, while negotiation offers flexibility and direct control,
emphasizing the adaptability of ADR in meeting various legal and commercial requirements. Each
method has its unique advantages, and understanding these distinctions is crucial in selecting the
most appropriate ADR method for a specific dispute.

2. What are the Salient features of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is the cornerstone legislation for arbitration and
conciliation in India, aimed at facilitating fair, efficient, and streamlined dispute resolution
processes. The Act draws heavily from the UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on
International Trade Law) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and incorporates
key principles that promote alternative dispute resolution. Below are the salient features of this
Act:

www.prolegalminds.com 46 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

1. Comprehensive Structure Covering Arbitration and Conciliation

The Act is divided into several parts, with Part I governing domestic and international commercial
arbitration in India, Part II covering the enforcement of foreign awards, and Part III dealing with
conciliation. This comprehensive approach offers a unified legal framework for both arbitration
and conciliation, making the Act an all-encompassing ADR statute.
2. Party Autonomy
The Act emphasizes party autonomy, allowing parties significant freedom in deciding the
procedure, appointment of arbitrators, place and language of arbitration, and applicable laws.
Sections 19 and 20 explicitly uphold the principle of party autonomy, allowing parties to agree
upon procedural rules and the location of arbitration.
3. Definition and Formation of an Arbitration Agreement
Section 7 of the Act defines an arbitration agreement as an agreement between parties to resolve
disputes arising out of a defined legal relationship through arbitration. The Act clarifies that the
agreement can either be a separate contract or an arbitration clause within a broader contract,
provided it is in writing.
4. Appointment and Independence of Arbitrators
The Act outlines a process for the appointment of arbitrators in Section 11, allowing parties to
agree on the number of arbitrators and procedures for their selection. If the parties cannot agree,
they may request the court to appoint an arbitrator. Section 12 requires arbitrators to disclose any
factors that might affect their impartiality or independence, ensuring transparency and
impartiality.
5. Power of the Arbitral Tribunal to Determine Its Jurisdiction
Known as the Kompetenz-Kompetenz principle, Section 16 empowers the arbitral tribunal to
determine its own jurisdiction, including any objections related to the validity of the arbitration
agreement. This principle prevents undue interference by courts in the arbitral process, fostering
greater autonomy for the tribunal.
6. Equal Treatment of Parties
Section 18 mandates equal treatment of parties, ensuring fairness by providing both parties with a
full opportunity to present their cases. This feature aligns with the principles of natural justice,
ensuring that no party is prejudiced during the arbitration proceedings.
7. Interim Relief by Courts and Arbitral Tribunals
Section 9 allows parties to seek interim relief from courts before or during the arbitration process
to preserve the subject matter of the dispute, such as asset protection. Section 17 empowers the
arbitral tribunal to grant interim measures during proceedings, ensuring that essential assets or
evidence are preserved.
8. Binding Nature of Arbitral Awards
The Act ensures that arbitral awards are final and binding on the parties. Section 35 states that
an arbitral award has the same enforceability as a court decree, meaning it is legally binding and
can be enforced like a judgment of a civil court.
9. Limited Grounds for Challenge of Arbitral Awards
Section 34 provides limited grounds for setting aside an arbitral award, focusing on procedural
fairness, public policy, or cases where the arbitration agreement is invalid. The Act aims to
minimize judicial interference in arbitral awards, respecting the finality and binding nature of
arbitration.

www.prolegalminds.com 47 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

10. Enforcement of Foreign Awards

The Act incorporates provisions from the New York Convention (1958) and the Geneva
Convention (1927) to enforce foreign arbitral awards. Part II of the Act deals specifically with
foreign awards, outlining procedures for recognition and enforcement while providing limited
grounds for refusal, such as inconsistency with Indian public policy.
11. Conciliation Process
Part III of the Act covers conciliation, which is a voluntary and non-binding ADR method. Sections
61 to 81 outline the conciliation process, appointment of conciliators, and the framework for
drafting a binding settlement agreement. Section 73 specifies that a settlement agreement
resulting from conciliation is enforceable as if it were an arbitral award, granting it finality and
legal effect.
12. Fast Track Procedure
Section 29B introduced the fast track procedure for arbitration, allowing parties to agree on an
expedited process. In fast track arbitration, the tribunal must render an award within six months
from the date of its constitution, enhancing the efficiency and speed of arbitration for
straightforward cases.
13. Limited Judicial Intervention
The Act limits court intervention in arbitration proceedings, in line with the international principle
of minimizing judicial interference. The Act only allows court involvement for essential matters,
such as the appointment of arbitrators under Section 11, interim relief under Section 9, and
enforcement or challenge of awards under Sections 34 and 36.
14. Confidentiality in Arbitration Proceedings
Recent amendments to the Act have added provisions on confidentiality. While not explicitly
stated in the original Act, confidentiality is now recognized as a critical feature, requiring parties
and arbitrators to keep all aspects of the arbitration proceedings private unless disclosure is
necessary for enforcing or challenging the award.
15. Costs of Arbitration
The Act also includes provisions for determining arbitration costs, especially after the 2015
Amendment Act, which introduced a model fee schedule for arbitrators in ad hoc proceedings.
This feature promotes transparency and provides parties with a clear understanding of the costs
involved.
Examples: A manufacturing contract between an Indian company and a foreign supplier might
include an arbitration clause specifying that disputes will be resolved under the UNCITRAL
Arbitration Rules in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ensuring that both
parties have a reliable mechanism for resolving conflicts.
• In a domestic employment dispute, both parties may agree to conciliation to seek a non-binding
settlement through a conciliator, facilitating an amicable resolution under Part III of the Act.
Reference Case Laws
• Bharat Aluminum Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum Technical Services Inc. (2012): Known as the BALCO
judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that Part I of the Act does not apply to arbitrations seated
outside India, emphasizing the autonomy of foreign-seated arbitrations.
• Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd. (2001): The Supreme Court held that foreign awards
can be enforced directly under Part II of the Act without the need for a separate proceeding,
simplifying the enforcement process for foreign arbitral awards.
• M/s Centrotrade Minerals and Metal Inc. v. Hindustan Copper Ltd. (2016): The Court upheld that
parties can agree to a two-tier arbitration process under the Act, affirming the importance of party
autonomy.

www.prolegalminds.com 48 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Conclusion
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is a progressive statute aligned with international
standards, promoting efficient, binding, and flexible ADR processes in India. By minimizing judicial
intervention and emphasizing party autonomy, the Act encourages businesses and individuals to
adopt arbitration and conciliation as effective alternatives to court litigation. This statute has
become foundational to India’s ADR framework, helping expedite dispute resolution and fostering
a pro-arbitration approach in Indian jurisprudence.

3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of alternative dispute resolution?

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) encompasses various methods, including arbitration,

mediation, conciliation, negotiation, and Lok Adalats, aimed at resolving disputes outside
traditional court proceedings. ADR has gained popularity for its flexibility, efficiency, and ability to
reduce the burden on courts. However, it also has some limitations. Below is a detailed analysis of
the advantages and disadvantages of ADR.

Advantages of Alternative Dispute Resolution

1. Cost-Effective
ADR processes generally cost less than traditional court litigation due to their simplified
procedures, fewer formalities, and shorter timelines. This cost-effectiveness makes ADR
particularly attractive for parties who want to resolve disputes without the financial burden of
prolonged litigation.
2. Time-Saving
ADR methods are faster than court proceedings. Disputes can often be resolved within months or
even weeks, depending on the method chosen. For instance, arbitration and mediation typically
have shorter timelines compared to court cases, which can take years to reach a final judgment.
3. Flexibility and Informality
ADR processes are generally more flexible, allowing parties to customize procedural aspects,
such as choosing a convenient location, language, and rules for the proceedings. This informality
provides a less intimidating environment, which can foster open communication and cooperation
between parties.
4. Confidentiality
ADR proceedings are private, ensuring that the details of the dispute, the evidence, and the
outcome remain confidential. This feature is especially advantageous in commercial disputes or
matters involving sensitive information, as it protects parties’ reputations and business interests.
5. Preservation of Relationships
ADR methods like mediation and conciliation encourage collaboration and compromise, making
them less adversarial than litigation. This can be particularly valuable when parties have ongoing
relationships, such as in family, business, or employment contexts, where maintaining a positive
relationship is essential.
6. Party Control over the Outcome
In methods like negotiation and mediation, parties retain control over the outcome and can craft
mutually acceptable solutions. This contrasts with court proceedings, where the judge imposes a
decision. In mediation, for instance, the mediator facilitates discussions, but the parties
themselves agree on the final terms.

www.prolegalminds.com 49 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

7. Reduced Court Burden

By resolving disputes outside of the traditional court system, ADR reduces the backlog of cases in
the courts. This is beneficial not only for the parties involved but also for the judiciary as it allows
the courts to focus on cases that require judicial intervention.
8. Enforceability and Finality (in Arbitration)
In arbitration, the arbitrator’s award is final and binding on the parties, similar to a court judgment.
It is enforceable in court, providing parties with certainty and reducing the likelihood of further
appeals or prolonged disputes.

Disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Resolution

1. Limited Scope for Appeal
In arbitration, the scope for appeal is very limited. Once an arbitral award is made, parties
generally cannot challenge it on merits, with appeals allowed only on procedural grounds or
violations of public policy. This can be a disadvantage if a party feels the arbitrator made an error
or overlooked critical evidence.
2. Possibility of Imbalance in Power Dynamics
In cases where one party has more resources or influence than the other, ADR may be less
effective. A powerful party may pressure the weaker party into accepting unfavorable terms,
especially in methods like negotiation or mediation, which rely on voluntary agreement and
compromise.
3. Enforceability Issues (in Non-Binding ADR)
Some ADR methods, such as mediation and conciliation, result in non-binding outcomes unless a
written settlement is signed. If one party does not comply, the other party may have to pursue
enforcement through the courts, which could diminish the time and cost savings associated with
ADR.
4. Potential for Delay in Arbitration
Although arbitration is generally faster than litigation, it can still be subject to delays, particularly
if parties choose ad hoc arbitration without strict procedural rules. Scheduling issues, procedural
disagreements, and challenges in appointing arbitrators can prolong the process.
5. Costs Can Escalate (in Arbitration)
While ADR is often cost-effective, complex arbitration cases can be expensive due to arbitrators’
fees, expert witness costs, and legal representation. Institutional arbitration, in particular, may
involve higher costs than initially anticipated, especially if the case is prolonged or involves
multiple arbitrators.
6. Lack of Formal Discovery
ADR methods, especially arbitration, typically lack the formal discovery process found in litigation.
This can be a disadvantage if parties need extensive evidence or discovery to prove their case.
Limited discovery can also make it challenging to obtain crucial documents or testimony from the
opposing party.
7. Dependence on Voluntary Participation and Cooperation
ADR methods like mediation, conciliation, and negotiation require the voluntary cooperation of
both parties. If one party is unwilling to participate in good faith or refuses to compromise, the
process may fail, requiring parties to return to court to resolve the dispute.

www.prolegalminds.com 50 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

8. Limited Use for Certain Disputes

ADR may not be suitable for all types of disputes, especially those involving serious criminal
matters, fundamental constitutional issues, or cases where injunctive relief is necessary. In such
cases, only a court of law can provide an adequate remedy or deliver justice.
Examples
• Commercial Dispute in Arbitration: In a contractual dispute between two businesses, arbitration
can provide a binding and enforceable resolution, ensuring that neither party has to endure
prolonged litigation. However, if the dispute involves significant documentary evidence, limited
discovery may hinder one party’s ability to present their case effectively.
• Family Dispute in Mediation: For couples seeking an amicable divorce, mediation helps them
agree on child custody, asset division, and other terms in a private, collaborative setting. However,
if there is a significant power imbalance, such as one spouse being financially dependent on the
other, mediation might not lead to a fair outcome.

Reference Case Laws

1. Bharat Aluminum Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum Technical Services Inc. (2012): Known as the BALCO
case, the Supreme Court ruled that arbitration awards from foreign-seated arbitrations could not
be challenged in Indian courts, highlighting the finality of arbitration and the limited scope for
appeal.
2. Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005): The Supreme Court emphasized the
importance of ADR in reducing the backlog in Indian courts, encouraging the adoption of ADR
methods like negotiation, mediation, and conciliation as viable alternatives to litigation.
3. Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (2010): The Supreme Court
endorsed ADR, especially in civil cases, to expedite dispute resolution and reduce litigation in
courts. The Court encouraged parties to consider ADR, particularly in family, commercial, and
contractual disputes.

Conclusion
ADR offers a range of methods that provide parties with flexibility, cost savings, privacy, and
control over the dispute resolution process. However, it is essential to understand the limitations
and potential risks associated with ADR, particularly in cases involving imbalances of power or the
need for extensive evidence. By carefully choosing the appropriate method and ensuring
procedural safeguards, ADR can be a highly effective alternative to traditional litigation, fostering
faster and more amicable dispute resolution.

4. Under what grounds an award of the Arbitrator can be set aside? Discuss.

An arbitral award is typically final and binding, providing a decisive resolution to disputes without
recourse to appeals or judicial review. However, under certain circumstances, a party may seek to
set aside an arbitral award. In India, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, outlines the
specific grounds under Section 34 for setting aside an arbitral award. These grounds aim to
balance the finality of arbitration with the need to prevent unfair, biased, or procedurally defective
awards.

www.prolegalminds.com 51 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Grounds for Setting Aside an Arbitral Award Under Section 34

1. Incapacity of Parties
Under Section 34(2)(a)(i), an award may be set aside if a party to the arbitration was under some
form of incapacity at the time of entering the arbitration agreement. This ground ensures that
parties have the legal competence to enter arbitration agreements and prevents coercion or fraud.
• Example: If one party to an arbitration agreement is a minor or mentally incapacitated, an award
based on that agreement may be set aside by the court.
2. Invalid Arbitration Agreement
According to Section 34(2)(a)(ii), an award can be set aside if the arbitration agreement itself is
found to be invalid under the law to which the parties have subjected it. This includes situations
where the agreement was forged, coerced, or violates fundamental legal principles.
• Example: If an arbitration clause in a contract is forged or signed under duress, the resulting
award can be challenged and potentially set aside.
3. Lack of Proper Notice or Inability to Present Case
Section 34(2)(a)(iii) allows for setting aside an award if a party was not given proper notice of the
arbitration proceedings or was unable to present their case due to procedural irregularities. This
provision safeguards the right to a fair hearing and ensures that all parties have an opportunity to
participate fully.
• Example: If an arbitrator proceeds with the hearing without notifying one party or denies them
an opportunity to submit evidence, the award can be set aside due to a violation of natural justice.
4. Arbitrator Acting Beyond Scope of Authority
Section 34(2)(a)(iv) states that an award can be set aside if it deals with matters beyond the
scope of the arbitration agreement. If an arbitrator makes a decision on an issue not submitted for
arbitration, this portion of the award may be struck down.
• Example: If the arbitration agreement covers only payment disputes but the arbitrator rules on
unrelated contractual terms, the award can be challenged for exceeding the scope of authority.
5. Improper Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal or Procedure Not in Accordance with
Agreement
According to Section 34(2)(a)(v), an award may be set aside if the composition of the arbitral
tribunal or the arbitration procedure was not in line with the agreement between the parties,
unless the parties have waived this objection by participating in the proceedings without raising it.
• Example: If the parties agreed to a three-member tribunal but the arbitration was conducted by
a single arbitrator, the award can be challenged based on procedural irregularity.
6. Award Contrary to Public Policy
Section 34(2)(b)(ii) allows a court to set aside an award if it is contrary to the public policy of
India. This ground was initially interpreted broadly but has since been narrowed to prevent
excessive judicial interference. The Supreme Court clarified in ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003)
that an award could be set aside for violating fundamental policy, justice, or morality. This was
further restricted in Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa (2013) and the 2015 Amendment Act,
which specified that awards can be set aside only if they:
• Are induced by fraud or corruption: If the award involves corruption or was obtained through
fraudulent means, it can be set aside.
• Are in violation of fundamental policy: The award must adhere to the basic principles of law and
public policy in India.
• Contradict the principles of justice or morality: The award should not conflict with India’s
ethical standards.

www.prolegalminds.com 52 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

• Example: If an arbitral award is based on a fraudulent document or if the arbitrator had a

personal stake in the outcome, the award can be challenged on public policy grounds.
7. Patent Illegality
As per Section 34(2A), introduced in the 2015 Amendment, an award arising from a domestic
arbitration (not an international commercial arbitration) can be set aside if it is “patently illegal.”
Patent illegality refers to a clear and apparent mistake of law on the face of the award that goes
against statutory provisions or established legal principles. However, it does not include mere
errors in reasoning or factual findings unless they involve a fundamental legal principle.
• Example: If an arbitrator misinterprets a statute or awards damages not permitted under Indian
law, the award may be set aside for patent illegality.
8. Grounds for Setting Aside International Commercial Awards
For international commercial awards, Section 34 limits judicial intervention further, only allowing
for challenges based on incapacity, invalidity of the arbitration agreement, lack of fair procedure,
excess of authority, and public policy. This limitation aligns with international standards,
minimizing judicial interference in international arbitration to make India a pro-arbitration
jurisdiction.

Examples of Application
• Commercial Contract Dispute: If two companies agree to resolve disputes through arbitration,
but the arbitrator exceeds their authority by addressing unrelated issues not covered by the
contract, the award can be challenged under Section 34(2)(a)(iv).
• Employment Dispute with Notice Violation: If an employee is arbitrating a wrongful termination
claim and is not given a chance to present evidence or rebut the employer’s claims, the employee
can challenge the award under Section 34(2)(a)(iii) due to procedural unfairness.
Reference Case Laws
1. ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003): The Supreme Court held that awards can be set aside if
they violate public policy, interpreting this term broadly to include fundamental policy, justice, and
morality. This case expanded the scope for challenging awards, especially in cases involving
procedural irregularities.
2. Venture Global Engineering v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. (2008): The Court reiterated
that fraud and corruption are grounds for setting aside awards, ensuring that arbitration remains
free from illegal influence.
3. Associate Builders v. DDA (2014): The Court clarified the grounds of public policy and patent
illegality, distinguishing between the two and affirming that only awards with clear legal
violations or conflicts with public policy could be set aside.
4. Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI (2019): The Supreme Court further
narrowed the public policy ground by ruling that courts cannot review the merits of the award
under the guise of public policy, making it clear that judicial interference should be limited.

Conclusion
The grounds for setting aside an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,
reflect India’s commitment to upholding the finality and independence of arbitration while
balancing the need to ensure fairness, integrity, and public policy compliance in arbitral decisions.
Courts in India are increasingly adopting a restrained approach, limiting their interference to
serious procedural or legal issues, thereby enhancing the credibility and efficacy of arbitration as
a viable dispute resolution method.

www.prolegalminds.com 53 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

5. Explain the powers and function of Conciliators

Powers and Functions of Conciliators
Conciliation is an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) method where a neutral third party, called
a conciliator, assists disputing parties in reaching an amicable settlement. Unlike arbitration,
which involves a binding decision by an arbitrator, conciliation relies on voluntary cooperation and
mutual agreement. The powers and functions of conciliators in India are defined under Part III of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically Sections 61 to 81. Below is a detailed
explanation of the powers and functions of conciliators under this Act.

Functions of Conciliators
1. Facilitating Communication and Understanding
The primary role of a conciliator is to facilitate open communication between the parties. The
conciliator encourages both sides to share their perspectives and concerns, helping them
understand each other’s viewpoints. This fosters a cooperative environment, essential for building
trust and exploring possible solutions.
2. Exploring Common Ground and Suggesting Solutions
A key function of a conciliator is to identify common interests and areas of agreement between
the parties. By highlighting these areas, the conciliator helps the parties focus on shared goals.
Additionally, the conciliator can suggest potential solutions, although these suggestions are non-
binding. The conciliator does not impose decisions but guides the parties in exploring options for a
mutually beneficial resolution.
3. Maintaining Impartiality and Neutrality
Conciliators must remain impartial and avoid any conflict of interest that could affect their
neutrality. According to Section 67 of the Act, conciliators are required to act impartially and
independently, treating both parties equally and without bias. This neutrality helps establish the
credibility of the conciliation process and encourages parties to trust the conciliator’s guidance.
4. Guiding Parties Toward a Settlement Agreement
The conciliator’s goal is to assist the parties in reaching a mutually acceptable settlement. If an
agreement is reached, the conciliator helps draft a settlement agreement, ensuring that it
accurately reflects the terms agreed upon by the parties. Section 73 of the Act states that if the
parties reach an agreement, the conciliator must record the settlement in writing, and both parties
sign it. Once signed, this settlement agreement becomes final and binding, enforceable as an
arbitral award under Section 74.
5. Assisting in Clarifying Legal and Procedural Aspects
Conciliators often explain procedural aspects and clarify legal implications related to the dispute.
Although they do not offer legal advice or act as advocates, they may provide general guidance on
the legal aspects of the issues involved. This helps the parties make informed decisions during the
conciliation process.
6. Encouraging Fairness and Equitability in the Process
Conciliators ensure that the process remains fair by giving both parties an equal opportunity to
present their viewpoints and concerns. Section 67(2) mandates that conciliators take into account
the circumstances surrounding the dispute and consider all facts presented. This ensures an
equitable process where both parties have a fair chance to express their interests.

www.prolegalminds.com 54 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

7. Maintaining Confidentiality
Confidentiality is a fundamental function of the conciliation process. Section 75 of the Act
ensures that all matters relating to conciliation proceedings remain confidential. Information
disclosed by one party to the conciliator cannot be shared with the other party unless permitted.
This confidentiality encourages open communication and reduces the risk of information being
used against a party if the dispute goes to litigation.

Powers of Conciliators
1. Power to Meet and Communicate with Parties Separately
Conciliators have the authority to meet and communicate separately with each party if required.
This power, as per Section 67(3), allows the conciliator to understand each party’s stance
independently, fostering open dialogue and creating a comfortable space for discussing sensitive
issues. Separate meetings help conciliators gain insights into underlying concerns and explore
settlement options.
2. Power to Request Information and Documentation
To fully understand the case and offer constructive suggestions, conciliators can request relevant
information and documentation from both parties. This enables the conciliator to gather all
necessary facts, ensuring that their suggestions are well-informed and appropriate to the context
of the dispute. However, this request is non-binding, and parties are not obligated to comply.
3. Power to Propose Settlement Terms
While conciliators cannot impose a binding decision, they are empowered to propose terms for a
possible settlement. Section 67(4) permits conciliators to suggest terms based on their analysis
of the case, helping guide the parties toward a resolution. This power is crucial when parties reach
a deadlock, as the conciliator’s proposal can offer a neutral solution for consideration.
4. Power to Draw Up the Settlement Agreement
Once the parties reach an agreement, the conciliator has the power to draft the settlement
agreement, as outlined in Section 73. This agreement documents the terms mutually agreed upon,
with the conciliator ensuring accuracy and clarity in the language used. The finality of this
agreement is reinforced by its status as an enforceable award under Section 74.
5. Power to Terminate Conciliation Proceedings
Conciliators have the authority to terminate conciliation proceedings in specific circumstances, as
stated in Section 76. The proceedings may be terminated if the parties sign a settlement
agreement, if one or both parties withdraw from the process, or if the conciliator believes that
further efforts are unlikely to result in a settlement. This power allows the conciliator to ensure
that conciliation efforts are effective and efficient, without prolonging unproductive negotiations.
6. Power to Act as a Neutral Evaluator
While not explicitly stated in the Act, conciliators often act as neutral evaluators of the case,
providing impartial assessments of each party’s position. This evaluation helps parties understand
the strengths and weaknesses of their claims, potentially motivating them to adjust their
expectations and work toward a realistic settlement.

www.prolegalminds.com 55 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Examples
• Employment Dispute: In a dispute between an employer and employee regarding wrongful
termination, a conciliator might suggest a monetary settlement or offer reinstatement with
revised terms. By facilitating dialogue and exploring both parties’ interests, the conciliator can
guide them to a mutually agreeable solution.
• Business Contract Dispute: For a dispute between two companies over contract performance, a
conciliator might meet separately with each company’s representatives to understand their
primary concerns. By proposing solutions such as contract renegotiation or compensation, the
conciliator helps the parties resolve their conflict without litigation.
Reference Case Laws
1. Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of Maharashtra (2000): The Supreme Court emphasized that
the role of conciliators is distinct from that of judges or arbitrators, highlighting the voluntary and
non-binding nature of conciliation. The case underlined the importance of neutrality and mutual
agreement in conciliation proceedings.
2. Mafatlal Engineering Industries Ltd. v. ICICI (1996): The Court reinforced the enforceability of
settlement agreements reached in conciliation, stating that a conciliation agreement has the
same binding effect as an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, thereby
emphasizing the finality of such agreements.
3. Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005): This case encouraged the use of ADR,
including conciliation, in Indian courts, stating that ADR mechanisms like conciliation help reduce
the burden on courts and provide quicker, amicable solutions to disputes.

Conclusion
Conciliators play a vital role in promoting amicable settlements by facilitating dialogue,
suggesting solutions, and maintaining neutrality. Their powers, such as meeting separately with
parties, proposing settlement terms, and drafting agreements, allow them to guide disputing
parties toward a mutually acceptable resolution without imposing a binding decision. Through
these powers and functions, conciliators help foster cooperative conflict resolution, reducing the
need for adversarial litigation and promoting more constructive outcomes for all parties involved.

6. What a note on the finality and enforcement of Arbitral Award?

Finality and Enforcement of an Arbitral Award
An arbitral award is the decision rendered by an arbitral tribunal in resolving a dispute submitted
to arbitration. In India, the finality and enforcement of arbitral awards are governed by the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which aims to provide a swift, binding, and enforceable
resolution to disputes. The Act ensures that awards are treated as final and binding while laying
down specific provisions for enforcing both domestic and foreign arbitral awards.

Finality of an Arbitral Award

1. Binding Nature of an Arbitral Award
According to Section 35 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitral award is final
and binding on the parties. This means that once an award is rendered, the parties are bound by its
terms and must adhere to the decision of the arbitral tribunal. Unlike court judgments, arbitral
awards have a limited scope for appeal, emphasizing the finality of the arbitral process and
discouraging prolonged litigation.

www.prolegalminds.com 56 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2. Limited Grounds for Challenge under Section 34

Although an arbitral award is final, Section 34 of the Act allows a party to apply to set aside the
award on limited grounds, such as procedural irregularities, incapacity, violation of public policy,
or lack of jurisdiction. However, the courts generally adopt a narrow interpretation of these
grounds to ensure that the arbitral process remains efficient and final, respecting the autonomy
and intent of the parties to resolve disputes through arbitration.
• Example: If an arbitrator fails to provide one party with an opportunity to present its case, the
award may be challenged under Section 34. However, the grounds for challenge do not permit a
review of the merits of the award, reinforcing the finality of the arbitral decision.
3. No Appeal on Merits
The Act does not allow parties to appeal an arbitral award on its merits. Courts only intervene if
there are procedural issues or if the award conflicts with public policy. This limited scope of review
ensures that the award retains its finality, discouraging parties from using courts as an additional
forum for dispute resolution.
4. Finality in Foreign Awards
For foreign awards governed by Part II of the Act, the principles of finality are aligned with
international standards, following the New York Convention (1958) and Geneva Convention
(1927). Foreign awards are considered final and binding, and courts only intervene in cases of
clear violations of procedural justice or public policy. This approach promotes India as a pro-
arbitration jurisdiction and facilitates cross-border enforcement.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
1. Enforcement of Domestic Awards: Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,
provides that an arbitral award shall be enforceable as if it were a decree of a civil court. Once the
award is final, i.e., once the time for filing an application to set aside the award under Section 34
has expired, or if such application has been refused, the award becomes enforceable. This
provision ensures that arbitral awards have the same enforceability as a court judgment, allowing
parties to seek enforcement through court mechanisms if necessary.
• Example: In a dispute between a contractor and a client, if the contractor receives an arbitral
award in their favor, they can directly enforce this award as a court decree. If the client does not
comply, the contractor may initiate enforcement proceedings in court to compel compliance.
2. Enforcement of Foreign Awards
The Act facilitates the enforcement of foreign awards under Part II, based on the principles
established by the New York and Geneva Conventions. Foreign awards are enforceable in India,
provided they meet certain conditions under Section 48. If the court finds that the foreign award
does not violate public policy or procedural fairness, it will enforce the award as a decree of the
Indian court.
• Example: A foreign arbitral award rendered in favor of a European company against an Indian
entity can be enforced in India by applying to an Indian court under Part II. The court will examine
the award on limited grounds, and if no issues are found, it will enforce the award, enabling the
European company to collect damages or seek relief in India.
3. Grounds for Refusing Enforcement
Both domestic and foreign awards may face refusal of enforcement on specific grounds, including
public policy violations, incapacity, or procedural irregularities. Section 48 outlines the grounds
for refusing enforcement of foreign awards, while Section 34 covers grounds for setting aside
domestic awards. However, courts adopt a narrow interpretation of these grounds, especially
regarding public policy, to preserve the finality and enforceability of arbitral awards.

www.prolegalminds.com 57 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4. Interim Relief and Execution

The Act allows parties to seek interim relief during the enforcement process to preserve assets or
maintain the status quo. Once an award is enforceable, it can be executed in the same manner as a
civil court decree, using mechanisms like attachment of assets, garnishment, or other legal
remedies. The ability to enforce awards through the court system ensures that successful parties
can secure meaningful relief.
5. Prohibition of Automatic Stay on Enforcement
Before the 2015 Amendment, filing an application to set aside an arbitral award under Section 34
would automatically stay enforcement. However, the 2015 Amendment removed this automatic
stay provision, requiring parties to seek a stay separately. This change promotes the finality and
enforceability of awards by preventing automatic delays and discouraging frivolous challenges.

Examples of Finality and Enforcement in Practice

• Commercial Dispute in India: If a manufacturing company receives an arbitral award in its favor,
ordering the other party to pay damages, the award is enforceable as a court decree. The
manufacturing company can file for enforcement under Section 36 if the other party fails to pay,
allowing the company to recover the damages through court-ordered asset attachment.
• Cross-Border Enforcement: If an American company wins an arbitral award against an Indian
distributor, the American company can enforce the award in India under Part II of the Act. Provided
the award meets the requirements under Section 48, it will be enforced as a court decree, allowing
the American company to collect damages or seek specific performance in India.
Reference Case Laws
1. Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd. (2001): The Supreme Court ruled that foreign
awards can be enforced directly under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act without requiring a
separate suit, thereby streamlining the enforcement of foreign awards in India.
2. Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa (2013): This case narrowed the interpretation of
“public policy” for enforcing foreign awards, aligning Indian law with international standards and
minimizing judicial interference in enforcement proceedings.
3. K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi (1998): The Supreme Court emphasized the finality of arbitral awards
and restricted the scope for setting aside awards on merits, reinforcing the binding nature of
arbitration and the limited grounds for judicial intervention.
4. DDA v. R.S. Sharma & Co. (2008): This case clarified that awards should be enforced unless
they clearly violate statutory grounds for setting aside. The decision reinforced the finality of
arbitration and minimized the possibility of frivolous challenges.
5. Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI (2019): The Supreme Court ruled that
judicial review of arbitral awards on the basis of “public policy” should be narrowly construed. This
case reinforced the approach that arbitral awards should be final and binding, ensuring minimal
interference by the courts.

Conclusion
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, promotes the finality and enforceability of arbitral
awards, ensuring that they are treated as binding and enforceable in the same manner as court
decrees. With limited grounds for challenge and provisions for enforcement, the Act upholds the
autonomy and efficiency of arbitration. Recent amendments and judicial interpretations have
further strengthened the finality of awards, making arbitration a viable and effective alternative
to traditional litigation in India and internationally.

www.prolegalminds.com 58 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

7. Discuss the importance of Sec 89 of the code of Civil Procedure code 1908 for
settlement of disputes outside the court.
Importance of Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for Settlement of Disputes
Outside the Court
Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was introduced with the aim of promoting
the resolution of disputes outside the traditional courtroom setting through Alternative Dispute
Resolution (ADR) methods. This section, introduced by the Amendment Act of 1999, marked a
significant shift towards encouraging out-of-court settlements in India. Section 89 provides a
mechanism for the courts to refer cases for ADR processes, thereby fostering efficient, cost-
effective, and amicable dispute resolution.
Key Provisions of Section 89
Section 89 states that if a court believes there is an opportunity for settlement, it may refer the
case for one of the following ADR mechanisms:
1. Arbitration: A binding process where disputes are resolved by an arbitrator whose decision is
enforceable in court.
2. Conciliation: A non-binding process where a conciliator assists parties in reaching a mutually
acceptable settlement.
3. Mediation: A voluntary and non-binding process where a mediator facilitates negotiation
between parties.
4. Lok Adalat: People’s Court where disputes are settled through compromise and are enforceable
as a court decree.
5. Judicial Settlement: Involves a judge as a mediator, facilitating settlement through mutual
agreement.
Importance and Advantages of Section 89
1. Reduction of Court Backlog and Judicial Efficiency
One of the primary reasons for the introduction of Section 89 was to reduce the overwhelming
backlog of cases in Indian courts. By referring cases to ADR, courts can focus on complex matters
that require judicial intervention, thereby improving the efficiency and speed of the judicial
process. With the provision for out-of-court settlement, Section 89 has contributed to reducing
the pressure on the judiciary and improving case management.
2. Promotion of ADR and Access to Justice
Section 89 plays a crucial role in promoting ADR in India, which was traditionally dominated by
litigation. ADR methods, such as mediation and arbitration, are less formal, flexible, and quicker,
allowing for faster dispute resolution. This has led to greater access to justice, especially for
individuals who may not have the resources for prolonged litigation. Section 89 reflects India’s
commitment to encouraging ADR as a primary mode of dispute resolution.
3. Cost-Effectiveness
ADR mechanisms are often more affordable than court litigation due to their simplified
procedures and shorter timelines. Section 89 enables parties to avoid expensive and prolonged
court proceedings by opting for out-of-court settlement methods. This cost advantage makes ADR
accessible to a broader range of people, fostering more efficient and affordable access to justice.
4. Preservation of Relationships
ADR methods, especially mediation and conciliation, encourage collaborative problem-solving and
compromise, which can help preserve relationships between the disputing parties. In cases
involving family, business, or employment matters, maintaining a positive relationship is often
desirable. Section 89 facilitates this by allowing cases to be settled through cooperative methods
rather than adversarial litigation.

www.prolegalminds.com 59 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

5. Confidentiality
Section 89 enables the resolution of disputes in a private and confidential setting, which is an
attractive feature for parties involved in sensitive matters. ADR methods, particularly arbitration
and mediation, ensure that the details of the dispute and the settlement remain confidential,
protecting the privacy of the parties involved. This confidentiality is especially beneficial in
commercial, family, and reputational matters.
6. Finality and Binding Nature of Settlement
Once a case is referred and settled through ADR methods like Lok Adalat or arbitration, the
settlement is legally binding and enforceable as a court decree. This finality offers parties a
definitive resolution and eliminates the scope for further litigation, providing closure and certainty
to the dispute.
7. Judicial Support for ADR and Legal Culture Shift
Section 89 reflects the judiciary’s support for ADR as an integral part of the legal system. This
provision has contributed to a culture shift, encouraging judges and lawyers to view ADR as a
credible and effective means of dispute resolution. With the judiciary’s endorsement, Section 89
has fostered a growing acceptance and use of ADR methods across the Indian legal landscape.
Application of Section 89 in Practice
Section 89 allows the court to assess the nature of the dispute and determine if it can be referred
for ADR. If so, the court provides parties with an opportunity to attempt an out-of-court
settlement. Some practical examples include:
• Commercial Disputes: In a contract dispute between two businesses, a judge may refer the case
to arbitration or mediation, allowing both parties to resolve the matter through a neutral third
party without disrupting their business relationship.
• Family Disputes: In matrimonial cases involving divorce, child custody, or maintenance, the court
can refer the parties to mediation, providing a collaborative environment to resolve sensitive
family issues without the adversarial nature of litigation.
• Consumer and Employment Disputes: For consumer complaints or employment grievances, Lok
Adalat or mediation can be effective in reaching a mutually acceptable solution. Section 89’s
provisions allow these cases to be resolved efficiently, saving parties from lengthy litigation.

Landmark Case Law

Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005):
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of Section 89 for
promoting ADR and reducing the case backlog in Indian courts. The Court addressed concerns
regarding the practical implementation of Section 89 and directed the formation of mediation and
conciliation centers in courts across India. The judgment highlighted that Section 89 should be
utilized to its full potential, ensuring that courts actively consider ADR as a primary option for
dispute resolution.
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (2010):
The Supreme Court clarified the application of Section 89, stating that the court has the
discretion to determine which disputes are suitable for ADR and referring them accordingly. The
Court stressed that only cases where compromise is possible should be referred under Section 89,
while cases requiring legal determinations or involving public interest should remain in court. This
judgment underscored the significance of Section 89 in promoting ADR while ensuring judicial
discretion.

www.prolegalminds.com 60 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Challenges and Limitations of Section 89

1. Lack of Awareness and Training
One of the main challenges in implementing Section 89 effectively is the lack of awareness about
ADR and insufficient training for judges and lawyers in ADR techniques. This can result in
reluctance to refer cases to ADR and limited effectiveness in promoting out-of-court settlements.
2. Non-Binding Nature of Some ADR Methods
Although methods like arbitration and Lok Adalat provide binding resolutions, others, such as
mediation and conciliation, rely on voluntary agreement. If one party does not comply with the
settlement terms, the other party may still need to approach the court for enforcement, which can
negate the time and cost savings of ADR.
3. Power Imbalance in Certain Cases
In some cases, especially those involving power imbalances (such as employer-employee
disputes), ADR may not be as effective. Without judicial oversight, there is a risk that the weaker
party might feel compelled to accept unfair terms.
4. Difficulty in Determining Suitability of Cases for ADR
Not all cases are suitable for ADR, and Section 89 gives courts discretion in deciding which cases
to refer. However, determining the suitability of cases can sometimes be challenging, and
inappropriate referrals may lead to ineffective ADR outcomes.

Conclusion
Section 89 of the CPC is instrumental in promoting ADR in India, providing an efficient and
effective alternative to traditional litigation. By encouraging the resolution of disputes outside the
courtroom, Section 89 has helped reduce the burden on courts, fostered quicker access to justice,
and strengthened the role of ADR in the Indian legal system. However, effective implementation of
Section 89 requires enhanced awareness, proper training, and careful case selection to ensure
that ADR fulfills its potential in providing amicable and cost-effective resolutions. Through
sustained efforts, Section 89 can continue to transform dispute resolution in India, aligning with
the global trend towards collaborative and less adversarial legal processes.

8. Explain the procedure for enforcement of Foreign Award?

Procedure for Enforcement of Foreign Awards in India

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in
India. Foreign awards are enforceable under Part II of the Act, specifically Chapter I for awards
under the New York Convention (1958) and Chapter II for awards under the Geneva Convention
(1927). The Act sets forth a streamlined process for recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral
awards, with limited grounds for refusal, aligning India with international standards and promoting
cross-border dispute resolution.

Definition of a Foreign Award

A foreign award is an award rendered in an arbitration proceeding conducted outside India and in a
country that is a signatory to either the New York or Geneva Convention, with which India has a
reciprocal arrangement. The award must arise from a commercial legal relationship, and its
enforceability is governed by Sections 44 to 52 of the Act for New York Convention awards and
Sections 53 to 60 for Geneva Convention awards.

www.prolegalminds.com 61 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Step-by-Step Procedure for Enforcement of Foreign Awards in India

1. Filing for Enforcement
To enforce a foreign award in India, the award-holder (the party in whose favor the award is made)
must apply to the appropriate High Court in India. The application must include:
• A duly authenticated original award or a certified copy of the award.
• The original arbitration agreement or a certified copy of the agreement.
• Any other relevant documents, including translations into English, if the award is in a foreign
language.
These documents are required to ensure the award’s authenticity and compliance with procedural
requirements.
2. Jurisdiction of the Court
Under the Act, only a High Court in India has the jurisdiction to enforce a foreign award. The
appropriate High Court is determined by where the assets of the award-debtor (the party against
whom the award is enforced) are located or where the award-debtor resides or carries on business.
3. Recognition of Foreign Award as a Decree
Once the application is accepted, the High Court treats the foreign award as a decree of the court
under Section 49 for New York Convention awards (or Section 57 for Geneva Convention awards).
This provision gives the foreign award the same status as a domestic court judgment, making it
enforceable through Indian courts’ execution mechanisms.
4. Notice to the Award-Debtor
After the enforcement application is filed, the court issues a notice to the award-debtor. The
award-debtor has the opportunity to present objections to the enforcement of the foreign award,
but only on limited grounds specified under the Act.
5. Grounds for Refusal of Enforcement
The award-debtor may oppose the enforcement of the foreign award on certain specific grounds
outlined in Section 48 of the Act for New York Convention awards (or Section 57 for Geneva
Convention awards). The grounds for refusal include:
• Incapacity of Parties: If one of the parties to the arbitration agreement was under some form of
legal incapacity.
• Invalid Arbitration Agreement: If the arbitration agreement is not valid under the law agreed
upon by the parties or the law of the country where the award was made.
• Improper Notice or Inability to Present Case: If the award-debtor was not given proper notice of
the arbitration proceedings or was unable to present its case.
• Exceeding Scope of Arbitration Agreement: If the award deals with issues outside the scope of
the arbitration agreement.
• Improper Composition of Tribunal or Procedure: If the composition of the tribunal or the
arbitration procedure was not in accordance with the parties’ agreement or the relevant law.
• Non-Binding or Set-Aside Award: If the award has not become binding on the parties, or has
been set aside or suspended by a competent authority in the country where it was made.
• Contrary to Public Policy: If the enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public policy
of India. The Supreme Court of India has clarified in cases like Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano
Spa (2013) that “public policy” grounds should be narrowly interpreted to avoid unnecessary
interference with foreign awards.
6. Court Decision on Enforceability
If the court finds that none of the grounds for refusal under Section 48 (or Section 57 for Geneva
Convention awards) apply, it declares the award enforceable in India. This declaration makes the
foreign award equivalent to a court decree and allows the award-holder to proceed with execution.

www.prolegalminds.com 62 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

7. Execution of the Foreign Award

Once the court recognizes the foreign award as enforceable, it can be executed in the same
manner as a decree of an Indian court under Section 36 of the CPC. The award-holder may seek
execution of the award by attaching and selling the award-debtor’s assets, garnishing wages, or
using other legal remedies available for enforcing a court judgment.
Key Considerations in Enforcing Foreign Awards
1. Public Policy Exception
The “public policy” ground for refusing enforcement has historically been the most contentious.
The Supreme Court has limited its application to fundamental policy violations, fraud, corruption,
or principles of natural justice to align with international standards. This interpretation prevents
frivolous challenges and promotes India’s reputation as an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction.
2. No Review on Merits
The enforcing court cannot review the merits of the award, which means that it does not have the
authority to re-examine the evidence or reconsider the arbitrator’s findings. This restriction
reinforces the finality of foreign arbitral awards and limits judicial interference.
3. Timeframe for Enforcement
While the Act does not specify a strict timeframe for enforcement, courts in India strive to
expedite the process to align with the international standard of minimal delay in enforcing foreign
awards.
4. Amendments and Pro-Arbitration Stance
The 2015 and 2019 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasize India’s
pro-arbitration stance by minimizing court intervention in arbitration and aligning the law with
international best practices. These amendments have further streamlined the enforcement
process, encouraging foreign parties to arbitrate in India and promoting India as an arbitration-
friendly jurisdiction.

Example Scenario
• Commercial Dispute between Indian and Foreign Entities: Suppose a U.S.-based company wins
an arbitration award in the United States against an Indian company for breach of contract. To
enforce this award in India, the U.S. company would file an enforcement application in the
appropriate High Court in India, providing a certified copy of the award, the arbitration agreement,
and other required documentation. The Indian court would notify the Indian company, allowing it to
contest the award on limited grounds. If no valid grounds are found, the court would declare the
award enforceable, and the U.S. company could then initiate execution proceedings to recover
damages from the Indian company’s assets.

Reference Case Laws

1. Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd. (2001): The Supreme Court ruled that a foreign
award can be enforced directly under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without requiring
a separate suit, streamlining the enforcement process and reducing delays.
2. Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa (2013): The Supreme Court restricted the
interpretation of “public policy” for foreign awards, ruling that it should only cover cases of
fundamental policy, justice, or morality. This case reinforced India’s pro-enforcement stance by
preventing unnecessary challenges based on public policy.

www.prolegalminds.com 63 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3. Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1994): The Supreme Court clarified that a
foreign award’s enforcement could be denied on public policy grounds only if it violated basic
principles of justice, morality, or national interest, thereby providing a narrow definition of public
policy.
4. Venture Global Engineering v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. (2008): The Court confirmed
that foreign awards could only be set aside on limited grounds, ensuring that foreign awards are
respected and enforceable unless they clearly violate procedural fairness or public policy.

Conclusion
The procedure for enforcing foreign awards in India under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996, reflects India’s commitment to honoring international arbitration agreements and awards.
By limiting judicial intervention to specific grounds, the Act ensures that foreign awards are
treated with respect and are enforceable as decrees of Indian courts. This pro-arbitration
framework encourages cross-border business and provides foreign entities with confidence that
their arbitral awards will be recognized and enforced in India, aligning India’s legal system with
global arbitration standards.

9. Discuss the composite functions of family court?

Family Courts in India were established under the Family Courts Act, 1984 to resolve family-
related disputes in a constructive, efficient, and amicable manner. The purpose of these courts is
to provide specialized forums for handling issues like marriage, divorce, child custody,
maintenance, and property matters among family members. The structure, procedures, and
functions of Family Courts are designed to foster understanding, reduce adversarial
confrontation, and prioritize the welfare of families, particularly children.

Key Composite Functions of Family Courts

1. Adjudication of Family Disputes
Family Courts have the authority to adjudicate various family disputes, including:
• Marriage and Divorce Cases: These courts handle cases related to annulment, divorce, judicial
separation, and restitution of conjugal rights.
• Child Custody and Guardianship: Family Courts decide issues related to custody, guardianship,
and visitation rights, ensuring the best interests of the child.
• Maintenance and Alimony: Family Courts have jurisdiction over claims for maintenance and
alimony, covering spousal support, child support, and other forms of financial relief.
• Property Disputes among Family Members: Family Courts can adjudicate family-related
property matters, particularly in the context of divorce or inheritance.
• Adoption and Related Matters: In some cases, Family Courts also handle legal aspects of
adoption, especially where custody or guardianship overlaps.
This comprehensive jurisdiction allows Family Courts to address various issues affecting families,
reducing the need for litigants to approach multiple courts.

www.prolegalminds.com 64 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2. Promoting Reconciliation and Settlement

One of the core functions of Family Courts is to promote reconciliation and settlement between
parties. Section 9 of the Family Courts Act mandates that Family Courts must attempt to promote
reconciliation before proceeding with a contested case. This is especially relevant in matrimonial
disputes where the court aims to preserve the marriage, if possible, or facilitate an amicable
separation. Family Courts often employ counselors or mediators to assist parties in reaching a
compromise, which can lead to faster and less adversarial resolutions.
3. Providing Counseling Services
Family Courts are equipped with counselors and trained professionals to provide counseling
services to disputing parties. Counselors help families and couples understand the implications of
their disputes, assess the welfare of children, and explore potential resolutions without
adversarial conflict. Counseling is particularly important in cases involving children, as it helps
parents focus on the child’s best interests. By offering counseling services, Family Courts help
parties communicate better, which can often lead to mutually acceptable solutions.
4. Ensuring Child Welfare and Best Interests
A critical function of Family Courts is to protect the welfare and best interests of children in
custody, guardianship, and visitation cases. Courts prioritize the child’s psychological, emotional,
and developmental needs, focusing on stability and a nurturing environment. Family Courts may
consult counselors, psychologists, and child welfare experts when determining custody or
visitation arrangements, ensuring that the child’s well-being remains the highest priority.
5. Simplifying Procedures and Reducing Formalities
Family Courts are designed to simplify legal procedures, reducing the complexity and formalities
associated with traditional court processes. The courts aim to provide an informal and non-
intimidating environment where family members can discuss their disputes freely. By minimizing
procedural delays, Family Courts make the legal process more accessible and efficient for parties,
particularly those with limited legal experience. This approach fosters a more constructive
atmosphere, helping family members focus on resolving their issues rather than getting entangled
in legal technicalities.
6. Providing a Speedy and Cost-Effective Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Family Courts are intended to expedite family-related cases, reducing the time and cost
associated with prolonged litigation. By consolidating jurisdiction over family matters and
simplifying procedures, Family Courts minimize delays and enable faster resolution. This approach
benefits families who might otherwise face financial and emotional stress due to lengthy court
proceedings.
7. Promoting Privacy and Confidentiality
Family Courts maintain confidentiality and privacy for sensitive family matters. Proceedings in
Family Courts are generally closed to the public, protecting the reputation and dignity of the
parties involved. This confidentiality is especially crucial in cases involving marital issues, child
custody, and sensitive personal matters, where privacy fosters a more open and less
confrontational process.
8. Empowering Women and Protecting Vulnerable Parties
Family Courts play a vital role in supporting the rights of women, children, and other vulnerable
individuals in family disputes. For example, in cases involving domestic violence, maintenance, or
child custody, Family Courts work to provide a supportive environment where vulnerable parties
can seek justice without fear of intimidation. By simplifying procedures and offering counseling
services, Family Courts ensure that all parties, regardless of their social or economic status, have
equal access to legal recourse.

www.prolegalminds.com 65 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

9. Executing Court Orders and Enforcing Maintenance Awards

Family Courts also hold the authority to enforce their orders, particularly in cases involving
maintenance, alimony, and child support. These courts can issue orders for the attachment of
property or wages if a party fails to comply with a maintenance award. This enforcement power
ensures that Family Courts’ decisions are binding, providing effective relief to individuals who may
need immediate financial support.
10. Encouraging Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Family Courts often promote ADR mechanisms like mediation and conciliation within the family
law context. Mediation and conciliation allow families to reach mutually acceptable settlements
without going through a trial. ADR is particularly useful in family disputes, where emotional stakes
are high, and a cooperative approach can result in a more satisfactory and sustainable solution for
both parties.

Examples of Composite Functions in Practice

• Child Custody Dispute: In a divorce case involving child custody, the Family Court may first
attempt reconciliation. If unsuccessful, it will consider the child’s best interests, consult with a
child psychologist if needed, and ensure privacy during proceedings. The court may issue a
custody and visitation order that aligns with the child’s welfare and enforce it as necessary.
• Marital Dispute over Maintenance: In a case where a spouse is seeking maintenance, the Family
Court would first assess the financial condition of both parties. It would try to encourage
settlement discussions, and if not reached, proceed with issuing a fair maintenance order. The
court’s simplified procedures allow the applicant to obtain relief without delays or extensive legal
costs.

Reference Case Laws

1. K.A. Abdul Jaleel v. T.A. Shahida (2003): The Supreme Court held that Family Courts have
exclusive jurisdiction over matters of maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure
Code (CrPC), emphasizing the Family Court’s authority to decide on such family-related matters.
This case highlighted the Family Court’s role in providing holistic relief in family disputes.
2. D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010): The Supreme Court stressed the importance of Family
Courts’ role in protecting the rights of women in domestic relationships, reinforcing that
maintenance and alimony claims fall within the court’s jurisdiction.
3. Mamata v. Balakrishna (2014): This case highlighted the Family Court’s duty to prioritize child
welfare in custody disputes, with the Court holding that the child’s interests should guide custody
decisions, illustrating the protective function of Family Courts in child-related matters.

Conclusion
Family Courts perform a range of composite functions designed to ensure justice, fairness, and
protection for families, with a strong focus on child welfare and women’s rights. By promoting
reconciliation, simplifying procedures, providing counseling services, and ensuring privacy, Family
Courts create an accessible and supportive environment for families. Their holistic approach
reduces adversarial conflict and fosters a constructive resolution process, serving as a valuable
alternative to traditional litigation for family disputes. Through their unique functions, Family
Courts play a critical role in providing timely, affordable, and effective justice for family-related
issues in India.

www.prolegalminds.com 66 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

10. What is the role played by Lokpal and Lokayukta in administration of justice in
India?

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, was established to create independent anti-corruption
bodies at the national and state levels to investigate complaints of corruption against public
officials, politicians, and government servants. Lokpal functions at the central level, while
Lokayuktas operate in the states. Together, these institutions play a vital role in enhancing
transparency, accountability, and integrity within the Indian administrative and political systems.
They act as watchdogs to curb corruption and uphold the principles of justice, morality, and good
governance.

Objectives and Importance of Lokpal and Lokayuktas

Lokpal and Lokayuktas are significant as they provide a mechanism for citizens to hold public
officials accountable, thereby strengthening the democratic framework. Their creation represents
an institutional response to the demand for a robust anti-corruption framework. Their main
objectives include:
1. Combating Corruption: Lokpal and Lokayuktas are designed to prevent and investigate
corruption within government institutions and the public sector, promoting transparency and
reducing the misuse of power.
2. Ensuring Accountability: By holding public officials accountable, these bodies increase
accountability within the administrative system, deterring misconduct and abuse of power.
3. Improving Public Trust in Governance: Lokpal and Lokayuktas strengthen public trust by
showing that no one is above the law, not even high-ranking government officials, ministers, or
bureaucrats.

Role of Lokpal in Administration of Justice

Lokpal operates at the central level and has a broad jurisdiction over various categories of public
servants, including the Prime Minister, Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, and senior
government officials.
1. Investigation of Corruption Allegations
Lokpal has the authority to investigate complaints of corruption against high-ranking officials. If
credible evidence is found, Lokpal can initiate proceedings against the accused, including
ministers and Members of Parliament (except for specific cases involving the Prime Minister,
where restrictions apply). This power makes Lokpal a critical entity in addressing corruption and
upholding justice at the national level.
2. Supervision of Anti-Corruption Investigations
Lokpal can supervise investigations by agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in
cases of public corruption. This supervisory role strengthens the investigative process by ensuring
that agencies act independently and follow due procedures, free from political interference.
3. Prosecution and Court Proceedings
Lokpal has the power to recommend prosecution based on its findings, which are presented in
designated special courts. Lokpal’s role in initiating court proceedings underscores its
commitment to delivering justice and preventing corruption through legally enforceable measures.

www.prolegalminds.com 67 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4. Protecting Whistleblowers
The Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2014, complements the Lokpal Act by providing protection to
those who expose corruption in public administration. Lokpal can play a role in safeguarding
whistleblowers, ensuring that individuals who reveal corruption are not subject to retaliation. This
protection promotes transparency and encourages people to report misconduct.
5. Asset Confiscation and Recovery
Lokpal has the authority to order the attachment and confiscation of assets obtained through
corrupt means, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. This asset confiscation serves as a
deterrent and helps recover illicit gains, contributing to economic justice and discouraging
officials from using public office for personal enrichment.
6. Public Awareness and Reporting
Lokpal’s public reporting functions promote awareness of corruption-related issues and provide
periodic reports to Parliament on its actions, investigations, and recommendations. These reports
foster transparency in the fight against corruption, enhancing public knowledge and
accountability.

Role of Lokayukta in Administration of Justice

Lokayuktas function at the state level and are the state counterparts of Lokpal. Their structure
and powers vary from state to state, depending on state-specific legislation.
1. Investigation of State-Level Corruption
Lokayuktas are responsible for investigating corruption complaints against state public officials,
including state ministers, legislators, and government employees. By handling state-level
complaints, Lokayuktas ensure accountability in the functioning of state administrations,
promoting clean governance at the regional level.
2. Preventing Misuse of Power in Local Administration
Lokayuktas address issues of misuse of power, bribery, and favoritism within state governments.
They monitor and investigate cases of administrative malpractices at various state government
departments, ensuring that officials adhere to legal and ethical standards.
3. Promoting Ethical Conduct in State Governance
Lokayuktas aim to uphold ethical behavior among state public officials by taking action against
those found guilty of corruption or misconduct. Their role in promoting integrity discourages
corrupt practices and reinforces adherence to the rule of law within state institutions.
4. Supporting Judicial Processes in Corruption Cases
Lokayuktas work with state investigative agencies to prosecute individuals found guilty of
corruption. They can submit cases to the courts with recommendations for prosecution,
facilitating the legal process and ensuring that justice is delivered.
5. Reporting and Recommendations for Good Governance
Lokayuktas submit reports to the state government, detailing investigations, findings, and
recommendations. These reports highlight governance weaknesses and recommend corrective
measures to prevent future corruption. Through regular reporting, Lokayuktas guide states toward
better governance practices and policy improvements.

www.prolegalminds.com 68 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Challenges Faced by Lokpal and Lokayuktas

1. Political Interference and Lack of Independence
Despite being autonomous bodies, Lokpal and Lokayuktas often face political pressures that
hinder their functioning. Ensuring complete independence from political influence is critical for
these bodies to operate effectively.
2. Delayed Appointments and Operational Constraints
Lokpal and Lokayuktas have faced delays in appointment processes and resource constraints,
impacting their ability to function efficiently. Without adequate personnel and infrastructure, their
capacity to investigate cases is limited.
3. Jurisdictional Limitations
Lokpal and Lokayuktas have specific jurisdictional boundaries, and the Prime Minister is subject to
investigation only under certain conditions. These limitations restrict their reach and reduce their
impact on the highest offices.
4. Lack of Awareness and Access
Many citizens are unaware of the procedures for approaching Lokpal and Lokayuktas, which limits
public engagement. Increased awareness campaigns and simplified access are necessary for
citizens to effectively use these anti-corruption mechanisms.
5. Coordination with Investigative Agencies
Lokpal and Lokayuktas often rely on agencies like the CBI and state police for investigations,
which may face operational delays or political pressures. Improved coordination with investigative
agencies is essential to enhance their efficiency.

Examples of Lokpal and Lokayuktas in Action

• Lokpal Investigation against Senior Bureaucrats: Lokpal investigates a senior bureaucrat
accused of amassing disproportionate assets. Upon confirming corruption, Lokpal recommends
prosecution and asset confiscation, deterring other officials from engaging in similar practices.
• Lokayukta in Karnataka: The Karnataka Lokayukta has been known for its proactive role in
investigating high-profile cases of corruption involving state ministers and bureaucrats. By
holding state officials accountable, the Karnataka Lokayukta set a standard for transparent
governance and demonstrated the effectiveness of state-level anti-corruption mechanisms.
Landmark Case Laws
1. Pramod Kumar Sharma v. Union of India (2017): The Supreme Court reinforced the powers and
jurisdiction of Lokpal, underlining its role in ensuring transparency and accountability in public
administration.
2. Anjali Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Union of India (2019): The Supreme Court addressed the delay in
appointments of Lokpal members, stressing the importance of having a functional anti-corruption
body to address corruption effectively.
3. N. Kannadasan v. Ajoy Khose (2009): This case highlighted the independence of Lokayuktas,
emphasizing that the appointment process should not be influenced by political considerations,
reinforcing the need for autonomy to combat corruption effectively.

www.prolegalminds.com 69 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Removal of Arbitrators
The removal or termination of an arbitrator’s mandate is outlined in Sections 12, 13, and 14 of the
Act.
1. Grounds for Challenge
Section 12 provides grounds on which an arbitrator may be challenged and potentially removed.
Key grounds include:
• Conflict of Interest: If the arbitrator has a direct or indirect interest in the case, is related to a
party, or has prior knowledge of the case that could lead to bias.
• Lack of Independence and Impartiality: If there are reasonable doubts about the arbitrator’s
impartiality.
• Inability to Perform: If the arbitrator is unable to perform their duties due to physical or mental
incapacity.
2. Procedure for Challenging an Arbitrator
Section 13 outlines the procedure for challenging an arbitrator:
• A party must submit a written statement specifying the grounds for the challenge.
• The arbitrator may choose to withdraw voluntarily, or the tribunal may decide on the challenge.
• If the challenge is rejected, the challenging party must wait until the final award is issued and
may then raise the issue in court as grounds to set aside the award under Section 34.
3. Termination of Mandate by Agreement or Court Decision
Section 14 allows the arbitrator’s mandate to terminate if they become de jure (by law) or de facto
(in fact) unable to perform their duties, or if they withdraw or parties agree to terminate their
mandate. If the arbitrator refuses to withdraw despite valid reasons, the parties can approach the
court to terminate the mandate.
4. Appointment of Substitute Arbitrator
Section 15 provides that if an arbitrator’s mandate is terminated, a substitute arbitrator is
appointed. The appointment process follows the same procedure used to appoint the original
arbitrator, ensuring continuity in the arbitration proceedings.

Summary
• Appointment: Parties have the freedom to decide the procedure; courts can appoint if there’s a
deadlock.
• Removal: Grounds include conflict of interest, lack of impartiality, or inability to perform;
challenges are raised in writing, and parties may approach courts if necessary.
• Substitute Arbitrator: Appointed in case of termination, following the original appointment
procedure.
This structured approach to appointment and removal ensures impartiality and integrity in
arbitration proceedings,

12. Explain the working of Lok Adalats in the speedy disposal of long pending
cases in the civil courts.

Lok Adalats, or “People’s Courts,” are an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in India aimed
at resolving cases amicably and efficiently outside the formal court system. Lok Adalats are
constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and are instrumental in addressing
the backlog of cases in civil courts by providing a forum for resolving disputes through
compromise and settlement. They are especially effective in disposing of cases that are pending
for long periods, delivering speedy justice and reducing the burden on the judiciary.
www.prolegalminds.com 70 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Features and Structure of Lok Adalats

1. Voluntary Nature and Consent-Based Resolution
Lok Adalats operate based on mutual consent, where both parties agree to resolve their dispute
amicably. Since participation is voluntary, parties retain control over the resolution process and
are encouraged to settle without the adversarial nature of traditional litigation.
2. Composition of Lok Adalats
A typical Lok Adalat panel consists of a retired or sitting judge and two other members, such as
social workers or advocates, who facilitate negotiations and settlements between parties. These
panels are organized at various levels, including district, state, and national levels, and operate
both permanently and as mobile units in rural areas.
3. Jurisdiction of Lok Adalats
Lok Adalats can handle a wide range of civil cases, including property disputes, family matters,
motor vehicle accident claims, and matrimonial disputes. They also have jurisdiction over pending
cases in courts and can take up cases that haven’t yet been filed if both parties agree to bring the
matter before the Lok Adalat.
4. Powers of Lok Adalats
Under Section 22 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, Lok Adalats have the same powers as a
civil court, including the authority to summon witnesses, examine evidence, and record
statements. They can settle cases by persuading the parties to reach a compromise, but they do
not impose decisions.
5. Binding Nature of Awards
The awards rendered by Lok Adalats are binding on both parties and have the same status as a
decree of a civil court. These awards are final and enforceable, with no provision for appeal,
ensuring that cases are conclusively resolved. This finality is essential for preventing prolonged
litigation and providing closure to parties.

Working and Procedure of Lok Adalats

1. Identification and Selection of Cases
Lok Adalats primarily target cases that are suitable for compromise and have been pending for
extended periods. The court, legal aid authorities, or parties themselves may identify these cases.
The cases may include:
• Pre-litigation cases that have not yet been filed in court
• Long-pending cases in civil courts that could be resolved through amicable settlement
2. Notification and Consent of Parties
Once a case is selected, both parties are notified and invited to attend the Lok Adalat. Since the
process is voluntary, both parties must agree to participate. The consent of parties is a crucial
factor, as the proceedings rely on mutual agreement rather than adjudication.
3. Conciliation and Negotiation
At the Lok Adalat, conciliators, including judges, advocates, and social workers, engage in
discussions with the parties. They encourage open dialogue and assist in negotiating a settlement,
helping parties understand the benefits of compromise. The focus is on achieving a win-win
solution that satisfies both parties.
4. Facilitating Settlement through Mediation
Lok Adalat members use mediation techniques to facilitate the settlement process. They help
parties explore options and find common ground, ensuring that the terms of the settlement are
fair and acceptable. This mediation approach is less adversarial, fostering cooperation and trust
between the parties.

www.prolegalminds.com 71 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

5. Issuing the Award

Once both parties agree on a settlement, the Lok Adalat issues an award based on the terms
agreed upon. This award is then recorded in writing and signed by the members of the Lok Adalat
and the parties involved. As per Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, the award
is final, binding, and enforceable, with the same legal standing as a civil court decree.
6. Execution and Enforcement of the Award
Since the Lok Adalat’s award is treated as a court decree, it is enforceable under the law. If either
party fails to comply with the award, the other party can approach the court for enforcement. The
enforceability of Lok Adalat awards ensures that the settlement is honored, providing an effective
and binding resolution.

Advantages of Lok Adalats in Speedy Disposal of Cases

1. Efficient and Time-Saving
Lok Adalats expedite case resolution by avoiding procedural formalities, making them highly
efficient. The absence of prolonged hearings and the simplicity of the process allow parties to
settle disputes quickly, often in a single day.
2. Cost-Effective
Lok Adalats are free of cost, and no court fees are charged. Parties avoid the financial burden of
traditional litigation, which makes Lok Adalats accessible and affordable, especially for
economically disadvantaged individuals.
3. Reduction of Case Backlog
By resolving cases through compromise and settlement, Lok Adalats help reduce the case backlog
in civil courts. This has a positive impact on the overall judicial system, allowing courts to focus on
more complex cases that require formal adjudication.
4. Preservation of Relationships
Lok Adalats promote compromise rather than confrontation, helping parties maintain
relationships. This is particularly beneficial in family, neighbor, and business disputes, where an
amicable settlement can prevent future conflicts.
5. Promoting Access to Justice
Lok Adalats make justice accessible to marginalized sections of society by offering a simple and
approachable process. Their mobile units bring justice to rural and remote areas, ensuring that
legal services are available to all.
6. Confidentiality and Informality
Proceedings in Lok Adalats are conducted in an informal setting, encouraging open discussion
without the pressure of formal procedures. This informal atmosphere is conducive to settlement,
especially in sensitive cases involving family matters or small financial disputes.

Examples of Lok Adalats in Action

• Motor Vehicle Accident Claims: Lok Adalats are commonly used for resolving motor vehicle
accident claims, where insurance companies and claimants reach settlements on compensation
amounts, bypassing lengthy litigation.
• Family Disputes: In divorce or child custody cases, Lok Adalats encourage mediation between
spouses, enabling them to reach mutually agreeable solutions and avoid adversarial court battles.
• Land and Property Disputes: Lok Adalats help settle property disputes by bringing the parties
together and mediating a compromise, which is especially beneficial in rural areas where land
disputes are common.

www.prolegalminds.com 72 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

5. Issuing the Award

Once both parties agree on a settlement, the Lok Adalat issues an award based on the terms
agreed upon. This award is then recorded in writing and signed by the members of the Lok Adalat
and the parties involved. As per Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, the award
is final, binding, and enforceable, with the same legal standing as a civil court decree.
6. Execution and Enforcement of the Award
Since the Lok Adalat’s award is treated as a court decree, it is enforceable under the law. If either
party fails to comply with the award, the other party can approach the court for enforcement. The
enforceability of Lok Adalat awards ensures that the settlement is honored, providing an effective
and binding resolution.

Advantages of Lok Adalats in Speedy Disposal of Cases

1. Efficient and Time-Saving
Lok Adalats expedite case resolution by avoiding procedural formalities, making them highly
efficient. The absence of prolonged hearings and the simplicity of the process allow parties to
settle disputes quickly, often in a single day.
2. Cost-Effective
Lok Adalats are free of cost, and no court fees are charged. Parties avoid the financial burden of
traditional litigation, which makes Lok Adalats accessible and affordable, especially for
economically disadvantaged individuals.
3. Reduction of Case Backlog
By resolving cases through compromise and settlement, Lok Adalats help reduce the case backlog
in civil courts. This has a positive impact on the overall judicial system, allowing courts to focus on
more complex cases that require formal adjudication.
4. Preservation of Relationships
Lok Adalats promote compromise rather than confrontation, helping parties maintain
relationships. This is particularly beneficial in family, neighbor, and business disputes, where an
amicable settlement can prevent future conflicts.
5. Promoting Access to Justice
Lok Adalats make justice accessible to marginalized sections of society by offering a simple and
approachable process. Their mobile units bring justice to rural and remote areas, ensuring that
legal services are available to all.
6. Confidentiality and Informality
Proceedings in Lok Adalats are conducted in an informal setting, encouraging open discussion
without the pressure of formal procedures. This informal atmosphere is conducive to settlement,
especially in sensitive cases involving family matters or small financial disputes.

Examples of Lok Adalats in Action

• Motor Vehicle Accident Claims: Lok Adalats are commonly used for resolving motor vehicle
accident claims, where insurance companies and claimants reach settlements on compensation
amounts, bypassing lengthy litigation.
• Family Disputes: In divorce or child custody cases, Lok Adalats encourage mediation between
spouses, enabling them to reach mutually agreeable solutions and avoid adversarial court battles.
• Land and Property Disputes: Lok Adalats help settle property disputes by bringing the parties
together and mediating a compromise, which is especially beneficial in rural areas where land
disputes are common.

www.prolegalminds.com 73 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Challenges Faced by Lok Adalats

1. Limited Jurisdiction
Lok Adalats can only resolve cases where parties agree to a compromise. If one party is unwilling
to settle, the matter cannot be resolved in a Lok Adalat and may require formal court proceedings.
2. Dependency on Voluntary Consent
Since Lok Adalats rely on voluntary participation, they cannot address disputes where one party is
resistant to settlement, which can limit their effectiveness in some cases.
3. Lack of Awareness
Many people, especially in rural areas, may not be fully aware of the benefits and procedures of
Lok Adalats, limiting their utilization.
4. Quality of Settlement
The informal setting may sometimes lead to compromises that are less rigorous than formal legal
judgments. There is a risk that settlements may not fully meet the legal standards that a court
might impose.
Landmark Case Law
State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (2008):
The Supreme Court emphasized that once an award is made by a Lok Adalat, it is final and binding,
with no further appeal, as per Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act. The court
reiterated that Lok Adalat awards cannot be challenged in higher courts, underscoring the
importance of finality in the Lok Adalat process.

Conclusion
Lok Adalats play an essential role in the Indian legal system by providing a speedy, cost-effective,
and accessible alternative to traditional litigation. Their focus on compromise, informal
proceedings, and efficiency helps reduce the burden on civil courts and ensures that justice is
served without delay. Lok Adalats, with their simple, approachable structure, enable individuals to
resolve disputes amicably and move forward without the time, cost, and stress associated with
court cases. They are especially significant for resolving long-pending civil disputes, creating a
more efficient and responsive judicial system.

13. Define mediation enhances access to Justice.

How Mediation Enhances Access to Justice

Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process in which a neutral third party, called a
mediator, assists disputing parties in reaching a voluntary, mutually agreeable settlement. Unlike
traditional litigation, mediation is a collaborative, non-adversarial approach to resolving disputes,
providing parties with control over the outcome. By simplifying the legal process and focusing on
amicable solutions, mediation plays a crucial role in enhancing access to justice in the following
ways:
1. Cost-Effectiveness
Mediation is typically much less expensive than traditional court proceedings, as it avoids lengthy
procedural requirements and the high costs associated with litigation. Since there are fewer
formalities, and disputes can often be resolved in a few sessions, mediation offers a cost-effective
way for individuals, especially those with limited resources, to access justice.

www.prolegalminds.com 74 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2. Faster Resolution
Traditional court cases can take years to resolve, whereas mediation allows parties to settle
disputes within weeks or months. This efficiency is critical in enhancing access to justice by
providing quicker relief, which is particularly beneficial in time-sensitive cases such as family
disputes, landlord-tenant conflicts, and small business issues.
3. Flexibility and Informality
Mediation offers a flexible and informal process, allowing parties to set their own timelines and
procedures. This adaptability provides a less intimidating environment compared to courtrooms,
making the process accessible to individuals who may be unfamiliar with or uncomfortable with
the formal legal system. This flexibility makes it easier for people to seek justice on their terms.
4. Empowerment and Control over the Outcome
In mediation, parties have the power to control the terms of the settlement, unlike in litigation
where a judge imposes a decision. This control empowers individuals to create solutions that best
meet their unique needs and circumstances. By giving people agency in their cases, mediation
makes justice more accessible, especially in personal disputes where parties’ preferences and
values play a significant role.
5. Preservation of Relationships
Mediation focuses on collaboration rather than confrontation, which can help preserve
relationships between the parties. This is particularly important in family disputes, community
conflicts, and business partnerships, where ongoing relationships are essential. By prioritizing
reconciliation, mediation fosters a form of justice that is less disruptive and more constructive,
helping people resolve disputes while maintaining important relationships.
6. Privacy and Confidentiality
Mediation proceedings are private and confidential, unlike court cases, which are generally public.
This privacy allows parties to discuss sensitive issues openly without fear of public scrutiny,
enhancing access to justice for those who might otherwise avoid legal action due to concerns over
privacy.
7. Accessibility for Marginalized Communities
Mediation can be more accessible to marginalized communities who may face barriers to justice,
such as language difficulties, unfamiliarity with the legal system, or limited financial resources. By
simplifying the process and making it affordable and approachable, mediation bridges gaps in
access to justice, ensuring that disadvantaged individuals can also find fair resolutions to their
disputes.
8. Focus on Sustainable and Creative Solutions
Unlike court-imposed judgments, mediation allows parties to explore creative and flexible
solutions that may not be possible through formal litigation. This focus on sustainable resolutions
ensures that parties achieve outcomes that genuinely address the root causes of the dispute,
providing longer-lasting justice and reducing the likelihood of future conflicts.

www.prolegalminds.com 75 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

9. Reduction of Court Backlog

By resolving disputes outside the court system, mediation helps reduce the backlog of cases in
civil and family courts. This, in turn, enables courts to focus on cases that require judicial
intervention, indirectly enhancing access to justice for those in the traditional legal system by
speeding up the process for all parties.

Conclusion
Mediation enhances access to justice by providing a cost-effective, faster, and more flexible
alternative to traditional litigation. By prioritizing amicable solutions, confidentiality, and
empowerment, mediation makes justice accessible to a broader range of individuals, including
those who might otherwise face barriers to the formal legal system. Through its emphasis on
collaboration and sustainable outcomes, mediation promotes a more inclusive and responsive
approach to justice that meets the needs of modern society.

14. Write about section 89 and order X Rules 1A,1B and 1C of CPC.

Section 89 and Order X of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, were introduced with the aim of
promoting alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, reducing the backlog of cases in Indian
courts, and expediting the dispute resolution process. These provisions emphasize the use of ADR
mechanisms such as arbitration, conciliation, mediation, and Lok Adalats as alternatives to
traditional court litigation. Together, they provide a framework for courts to encourage parties to
settle disputes amicably outside the courtroom, making justice more accessible, efficient, and less
adversarial.
Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 89 was introduced by the CPC (Amendment) Act of 1999 to provide a legal basis for
courts to refer cases to ADR mechanisms if there is an element of settlement possible in the
dispute. The objective of Section 89 is to reduce the burden on the judiciary, promote amicable
settlements, and provide parties with faster, cost-effective means of resolving disputes.

Key Provisions of Section 89

1. Referral to ADR
Section 89 empowers the court, when it appears that elements of a settlement exist in a dispute,
to refer the parties to ADR. The court can encourage the parties to explore ADR methods such as
arbitration, conciliation, mediation, Lok Adalat, or judicial settlement (settlement facilitated by the
judge).
2. Types of ADR Mechanisms Under Section 89
Section 89 specifies five types of ADR processes:
• Arbitration: A binding ADR method where an arbitrator makes a final decision on the dispute.
• Conciliation: A non-binding process where a conciliator helps parties reach a mutually
acceptable settlement.
• Mediation: A voluntary, non-binding process where a mediator facilitates negotiations and
settlement.
• Judicial Settlement: A judge facilitates settlement discussions and helps parties reach an
agreement.
• Lok Adalat: A people’s court where disputes are resolved through compromise. Lok Adalat
awards are binding and have the status of a court decree.

www.prolegalminds.com 76 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3. Objective of Section 89
The main objective of Section 89 is to decongest the courts by encouraging out-of-court
settlements, saving time and costs for both the judiciary and litigants. By promoting ADR, Section
89 aims to provide a more flexible, cooperative, and accessible means of resolving disputes.
4. Judicial Interpretation
The Supreme Court of India in Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005)
emphasized the importance of Section 89 and recommended that courts actively encourage
parties to explore ADR. The court highlighted that Section 89 should be used to ensure cases
suitable for settlement are resolved efficiently and to foster a culture of amicable resolution.
Order X, Rules 1A, 1B, and 1C of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Order X of the CPC deals with the examination of parties by the court, allowing the court to gather
information about the nature of the dispute and explore settlement possibilities. Rules 1A, 1B, and
1C under Order X were introduced to support the implementation of Section 89 and facilitate the
referral of cases to ADR methods.

Rule 1A: Direction to Opt for ADR

Order X, Rule 1A allows the court to direct parties to opt for one of the ADR methods when a
settlement appears possible. The court may issue this direction after examining the parties and
assessing the nature of the dispute.
• Procedure: After the first hearing, if the court feels that the case can be resolved through ADR, it
may order the parties to attempt an amicable settlement through one of the ADR options specified
in Section 89.
• Objective: Rule 1A encourages parties to explore ADR options, reducing the need for lengthy
trials and promoting an environment of cooperation and compromise.

Rule 1B: Appearance Before a Conciliatory Forum or Authority

Order X, Rule 1B mandates that once the court has directed the parties to opt for ADR under Rule
1A, the parties must appear before the designated conciliatory forum or authority for the chosen
ADR method.
• Purpose: This rule ensures that the parties actively participate in the ADR process and appear
before the conciliatory forum or authority.
• Implementation: The designated forum may include mediation centers, arbitrators, conciliators,
or Lok Adalats, depending on the ADR method chosen by the parties.

Rule 1C: Report of the ADR Authority to the Court

Order X, Rule 1C requires the conciliatory authority or mediator to report the outcome of the ADR
proceedings to the court.
• Objective: The purpose of Rule 1C is to inform the court of the result of the ADR process, whether
successful or unsuccessful, allowing the court to proceed accordingly.
• Follow-Up Actions: If a settlement is reached, the court may pass an order based on the
settlement terms. If no settlement is achieved, the case may proceed to trial as usual.
Importance of Section 89 and Order X, Rules 1A, 1B, and 1C
1. Promotes Amicable Resolution
Section 89 and Order X encourage parties to settle disputes amicably through ADR methods,
which fosters a more collaborative approach to conflict resolution. This reduces hostility and
preserves relationships, especially in family, community, and business disputes.

www.prolegalminds.com 77 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2. Reduces Judicial Backlog

By diverting cases from the regular court process to ADR, these provisions help alleviate the heavy
case load on courts. This, in turn, allows the judiciary to focus on cases requiring judicial
determination, improving the efficiency of the legal system.
3. Time and Cost Savings
ADR is generally faster and more cost-effective than litigation. By directing cases toward ADR,
Section 89 and Order X provide parties with quicker access to justice, reducing the time and
expense associated with lengthy court proceedings.
4. Encourages Access to Justice
The use of ADR makes the legal system more accessible, especially to individuals who may be
discouraged by the costs, time, and complexity of litigation. These provisions ensure that even
individuals with limited resources have an avenue for resolving disputes effectively.
5. Enhances Court’s Role in Dispute Resolution
Section 89 and Order X expand the role of courts from merely adjudicating disputes to actively
encouraging settlement. This transformation aligns the judiciary with a more facilitative and
conciliatory approach to justice.
6. Fosters a Culture of ADR
By integrating ADR into the civil procedure, Section 89 and Order X promote a culture of ADR in
India. This change reflects a global trend of utilizing ADR to manage and resolve conflicts, making
the legal system more responsive and adaptable.
Key Case Law
Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005):
The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of Section 89 in the CPC, stating that courts
should encourage parties to explore ADR whenever possible. The Court clarified that ADR
mechanisms under Section 89 are essential to achieving justice in a timely and cost-effective
manner, reducing the burden on the judiciary.

Conclusion
Section 89 and Order X, Rules 1A, 1B, and 1C of the CPC provide a structured framework for
incorporating ADR into the judicial process, allowing courts to facilitate quicker and more
collaborative dispute resolution. These provisions reflect India’s commitment to promoting ADR as
a viable alternative to litigation, aiming to make justice more accessible, cost-effective, and
efficient for all. Through these measures, the Indian legal system can reduce case backlogs, foster
a cooperative culture of dispute resolution, and ensure that parties can achieve amicable
settlements outside the formal courtroom environment.

15. ADR under different laws in India

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) under Different Laws in India

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms, such as arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and
negotiation, have gained prominence in India as effective methods for resolving disputes outside
the traditional courtroom setting. Recognizing the benefits of ADR in terms of efficiency, cost-
effectiveness, and preservation of relationships, various laws and statutes in India have
incorporated ADR provisions. Here is an overview of how ADR is integrated under different laws in
India:

www.prolegalminds.com 78 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

1. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is the cornerstone legislation for ADR in India,
providing a comprehensive framework for both arbitration and conciliation.
• Arbitration: The Act governs domestic and international arbitration in India, allowing parties to
resolve disputes through a binding decision by an arbitrator. It defines the scope of arbitration
agreements, the process of appointing arbitrators, and the enforcement of arbitral awards,
making arbitration a widely used ADR method.
• Conciliation: The Act provides rules for conciliation, a non-binding ADR process in which a
conciliator helps parties reach an amicable settlement. This part of the Act emphasizes flexibility,
allowing parties to settle disputes voluntarily without formal procedures.
• Key Amendments: The 2015 and 2019 amendments to the Act streamlined arbitration
procedures and aligned India’s arbitration laws with international standards, making arbitration
faster and more efficient.
2. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, includes provisions to promote ADR through Section 89 and
Order X, Rules 1A, 1B, and 1C.
• Section 89: Introduced in 2002, Section 89 enables courts to refer cases for ADR when there are
elements of a settlement. The section specifies that cases can be referred to arbitration,
conciliation, mediation, Lok Adalat, or judicial settlement.
• Order X: Rules 1A, 1B, and 1C further support Section 89 by enabling courts to guide parties
toward ADR options, requiring their appearance before conciliatory authorities, and reporting the
outcome of the ADR process back to the court.
These provisions aim to alleviate the burden on courts and encourage amicable dispute resolution,
reducing the time and cost of litigation.
3. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, provides a statutory basis for Lok Adalats (People’s
Courts) as a form of ADR, offering a forum for resolving disputes through compromise and
settlement.
• Lok Adalats: Lok Adalats are organized at the national, state, and district levels to resolve
pending cases or pre-litigation disputes. They are particularly useful for settling disputes
involving civil, family, and small claims cases.
• Binding Awards: Awards rendered by Lok Adalats are binding on both parties and have the same
legal status as a court decree. These awards are final, with no option for appeal, making them
effective for quick dispute resolution.
• Mobile Lok Adalats: To increase access to justice, mobile Lok Adalats are conducted in rural and
remote areas, ensuring that marginalized communities have access to ADR.
4. Commercial Courts Act, 2015
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, provides for the establishment of Commercial Courts to handle
disputes of a commercial nature. The Act encourages ADR by mandating pre-institution
mediation for certain commercial disputes.
• Pre-Institution Mediation: Parties in commercial disputes that do not involve urgent relief (like
injunctions) are required to attempt mediation before filing a suit in a Commercial Court. This
requirement is intended to reduce the number of commercial cases that go to trial, promoting
quicker, cost-effective settlements.
• Specialized Mediation Centers: The Act authorizes the establishment of specialized mediation
centers to handle these pre-institution mediation cases, ensuring that commercial disputes are
resolved efficiently.

www.prolegalminds.com 79 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

5. Family Courts Act, 1984

The Family Courts Act, 1984, emphasizes the use of ADR, particularly conciliation and mediation,
in family disputes. The Act aims to create a less adversarial atmosphere for resolving family-
related disputes.
• Mandatory Conciliation: Family Courts are required to attempt reconciliation between parties
before proceeding with the case. Judges may act as conciliators, or counselors may be involved to
help parties reach a settlement.
• Mediation Centers in Family Courts: Family Courts often have dedicated mediation centers to
facilitate settlement in cases involving divorce, child custody, maintenance, and other family
matters. Mediation is especially useful in family cases as it focuses on preserving relationships
and minimizing emotional distress.
6. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, provides for ADR mechanisms like conciliation and arbitration
to resolve disputes between employers and employees.
• Conciliation Officers: Under the Act, the government appoints conciliation officers to mediate
disputes in the early stages, aiming to prevent strikes or lockouts. The conciliation officer acts as
a mediator between labor unions and employers to help reach an agreement.
• Voluntary Arbitration: The Act allows parties to refer disputes to arbitration if conciliation fails.
This voluntary arbitration process provides a quicker alternative to lengthy court procedures and
helps maintain industrial peace.
7. The Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013, encourages ADR mechanisms, particularly mediation and conciliation,
for resolving corporate disputes. The Act emphasizes the use of ADR for settling disputes
involving corporate governance, shareholder issues, and business transactions.
• Mediation and Conciliation Panel: The Act provides for a Mediation and Conciliation Panel to
facilitate out-of-court settlements. This panel is available for disputes between shareholders,
creditors, and management.
• National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT): The NCLT is empowered to refer certain cases for
mediation or conciliation, promoting an amicable resolution to corporate disputes, which reduces
litigation costs for businesses and stakeholders.
8. Consumer Protection Act, 2019
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, emphasizes mediation as a key ADR mechanism for resolving
disputes between consumers and businesses.
• Mediation Cells in Consumer Commissions: The Act mandates the establishment of mediation
cells at district, state, and national consumer commissions. If both parties agree, the consumer
forum may refer the matter to mediation before proceeding with the case.
• Voluntary Mediation: Mediation is voluntary under this Act, providing consumers with an option
to resolve their complaints in a less formal, quicker, and cost-effective manner than litigation.
9. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act)
The MSMED Act, 2006, promotes ADR mechanisms, particularly conciliation and arbitration, for
resolving payment-related disputes involving Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs).
• MSME Facilitation Councils: The Act establishes MSME Facilitation Councils to resolve disputes
between MSMEs and large enterprises through conciliation. If conciliation fails, the council can
refer the case to arbitration, making ADR a crucial tool for MSMEs to recover unpaid dues.
• Speedy Disposal: The councils are mandated to complete conciliation or arbitration proceedings
within a specific timeframe, providing MSMEs with swift justice.

www.prolegalminds.com 80 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

10. Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA)

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, encourages ADR in disputes between
homebuyers and builders, as well as disputes between real estate developers and regulators.
• Conciliation Forums under RERA: Many states have established conciliation forums under RERA,
enabling homebuyers and builders to resolve disputes amicably. These forums provide an
accessible platform for quick, low-cost resolution.
• Online ADR: Some RERA bodies facilitate online ADR, allowing parties to resolve disputes
without physical court appearances, making justice accessible and convenient.
11. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and Special Marriage Act, 1954
Both the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the Special Marriage Act, 1954, contain provisions
encouraging conciliation and mediation in matrimonial disputes.
• Conciliation and Reconciliation Efforts: Before granting divorce or separation, courts are
required to attempt reconciliation between the parties. This provision encourages ADR in marital
disputes, with a focus on preserving the marriage where possible.
• Family Courts’ Role: Family Courts established under these Acts work to resolve matrimonial
disputes through mediation and conciliation, reducing adversarial confrontation and focusing on
mutual agreements.

Conclusion
ADR has been increasingly integrated into various Indian laws, recognizing its value in providing
accessible, efficient, and amicable solutions to disputes across sectors. From commercial disputes
to family matters, labor issues, consumer complaints, and real estate conflicts, ADR mechanisms
have become essential for promoting justice outside the courtroom. Through arbitration,
mediation, conciliation, and Lok Adalats, these laws offer flexible and cost-effective alternatives
to litigation, contributing to a more responsive, people-centered justice system in India.

16. Arbitration Council of India (ACI)

The Arbitration Council of India (ACI) was established under the Arbitration and Conciliation
(Amendment) Act, 2019, as a regulatory body to promote and strengthen institutional arbitration
in India. Its creation aims to position India as a global hub for arbitration, improving the efficiency,
quality, and credibility of arbitration services within the country. The ACI is responsible for
regulating the functioning of arbitration institutions, grading arbitrators, and setting benchmarks
for arbitration standards in India, ensuring a robust arbitration ecosystem.

Objectives of the Arbitration Council of India

1. Promote Institutional Arbitration: ACI’s primary objective is to encourage and promote
institutional arbitration, which offers a structured framework and efficient handling of cases
compared to ad hoc arbitration.
2. Enhance Arbitration Standards: ACI aims to improve the quality and credibility of arbitration in
India by establishing high standards for arbitrators and arbitration institutions.
3. Position India as an Arbitration Hub: By setting benchmarks and creating a trustworthy
regulatory framework, ACI seeks to make India an attractive destination for both domestic and
international arbitration, competing with global arbitration centers like Singapore and London.

www.prolegalminds.com 81 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Functions and Powers of the Arbitration Council of India

1. Grading of Arbitration Institutions

ACI is empowered to grade arbitration institutions based on criteria such as infrastructure, quality
of arbitrators, fees, and case management. This grading system helps parties select reputable
institutions and ensures that institutions meet professional standards, enhancing the reliability
and efficiency of arbitration in India.
2. Accreditation of Arbitrators
ACI is responsible for accrediting arbitrators by assessing their qualifications, experience,
integrity, and professional ethics. Accredited arbitrators must meet specific criteria, which
assures parties of their competence and impartiality, thereby raising the quality of arbitration in
India.
3. Setting Standards for Arbitration
ACI establishes rules and guidelines for the conduct of arbitration proceedings, code of ethics for
arbitrators, and best practices for arbitration institutions. These standards ensure transparency,
fairness, and efficiency in arbitration, fostering confidence among parties who opt for arbitration
over litigation.
4. Promoting Research and Training
ACI promotes research, training, and development in arbitration law and practices. It organizes
training programs for arbitrators, lawyers, and institutions to improve their skills, keeping them
informed of international arbitration practices and developments. This focus on capacity-building
helps maintain the quality and relevance of arbitration in India.
5. Making Recommendations for Legislative Changes
ACI has the authority to make recommendations to the central government for reforms in
arbitration law to address evolving needs. By staying responsive to changes in the global
arbitration landscape, ACI plays a role in modernizing India’s arbitration laws and policies.
6. Maintaining an Online Database of Accredited Arbitrators and Institutions
ACI maintains an accessible online database of accredited arbitrators and institutions, providing
parties with easy access to qualified professionals. This transparency assists parties in making
informed choices, supporting trust and efficiency in the arbitration process.
7. Organizing Conferences and Seminars
To promote arbitration and create awareness, ACI organizes conferences, seminars, and
workshops. These events are aimed at educating businesses, legal professionals, and the public on
the benefits of arbitration and the standards set by ACI, further popularizing arbitration as a
preferred dispute resolution mechanism.

Structure and Composition of the Arbitration Council of India

The ACI consists of members appointed by the central government, with representation from
various sectors, including:
• A retired Supreme Court judge or Chief Justice of a High Court as Chairperson.
• An eminent arbitration practitioner with domestic or international experience.
• A member from a recognized arbitration institution.
• Other representatives from law, industry, and academia.
The multi-disciplinary composition of ACI brings diverse expertise, ensuring that the council’s
standards and practices reflect a broad understanding of arbitration needs.

www.prolegalminds.com 82 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Benefits of the Arbitration Council of India

1. Enhanced Credibility and Trust
By accrediting arbitrators and grading institutions, ACI improves the reliability of arbitration in
India, fostering trust among domestic and international parties.
2. Streamlined and Efficient Arbitration
Through standards and guidelines, ACI promotes a uniform approach to arbitration, reducing
procedural delays and promoting swift dispute resolution.
3. Promotion of Skilled Arbitrators
ACI’s focus on accreditation and training ensures that arbitrators are qualified, ethical, and skilled,
elevating the professionalism of arbitration in India.
4. Reduced Court Intervention
With ACI’s regulatory framework, arbitration institutions and arbitrators are expected to function
more independently, reducing the need for court intervention and supporting the goal of
minimizing judicial interference in arbitration.
5. Competitive Positioning
By establishing India as a reliable arbitration jurisdiction, ACI helps India compete with
established arbitration hubs, attracting foreign investors and businesses seeking arbitration-
friendly jurisdictions.

Challenges and Criticisms

1. Independence of the Council
Since ACI is a government-established body, concerns exist regarding its independence. For
international credibility, ACI must demonstrate independence from government influence to
ensure unbiased regulation.
2. Implementation and Enforcement of Standards
Setting standards and enforcing them across India’s diverse arbitration institutions may be
challenging. Consistent implementation of ACI’s regulations and guidelines is essential for
creating a standardized arbitration landscape.
3. Adaptation of International Practices
While ACI promotes domestic arbitration, it also needs to adopt practices compatible with
international arbitration to attract foreign parties. Balancing domestic requirements with
international standards is crucial for India’s positioning as an arbitration hub.

Conclusion
The Arbitration Council of India plays a vital role in strengthening India’s arbitration landscape,
promoting institutional arbitration, and setting high standards for arbitration quality. By
accrediting arbitrators, grading institutions, and encouraging best practices, ACI aims to enhance
the efficiency, credibility, and accessibility of arbitration in India. Although challenges remain in
ensuring its independence and maintaining international competitiveness, ACI represents a
significant step towards establishing India as a preferred jurisdiction for arbitration, benefiting
both domestic and international stakeholders.

www.prolegalminds.com 83 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

17. International Commercial Arbitration Uncitral Model law on International

commercial Arbitration, 1985

The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, adopted in 1985 by the
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), serves as a framework for
harmonizing and modernizing arbitration laws worldwide. This Model Law was designed to guide
countries in establishing uniform legal standards for international commercial arbitration,
ensuring a consistent approach across jurisdictions. By providing a balanced and flexible legal
framework, the Model Law aims to promote efficiency, fairness, and predictability in cross-border
arbitration, making it easier for parties from different countries to resolve disputes.

Key Objectives of the UNCITRAL Model Law

1. Standardization of Arbitration Laws
The Model Law aims to create a consistent legal framework for arbitration across countries,
reducing the variability and uncertainty that can arise when disputes are governed by differing
national laws.
2. Enhancement of Arbitration as a Dispute Resolution Mechanism
It promotes international commercial arbitration as a reliable, efficient, and enforceable means of
resolving cross-border disputes, thereby fostering global trade and investment.
3. Minimization of Court Intervention
The Model Law limits the role of national courts in arbitration, emphasizing the autonomy of the
arbitral process. Courts can only intervene in specific circumstances, such as in the appointment
of arbitrators, interim measures, and enforcement or setting aside of awards.
4. Protection of Party Autonomy
The Model Law prioritizes party autonomy, allowing parties significant freedom to define
procedural rules, select arbitrators, and determine the place of arbitration.
5. Provision of a Fair and Neutral Process
The Model Law establishes procedures that ensure impartiality, fairness, and transparency,
making arbitration accessible to parties from different legal systems and cultures.

Key Provisions of the UNCITRAL Model Law

The Model Law provides a comprehensive framework for various aspects of the arbitration
process, from the initial agreement to the enforcement of awards.
1. Arbitration Agreement (Articles 7-8)
• Form and Validity: The Model Law defines an arbitration agreement as an agreement to submit
disputes to arbitration. It recognizes both written and electronic forms, ensuring flexibility.
• Separability and Competence: The arbitration agreement is treated as independent from the
main contract. Even if the contract is invalid, the arbitration clause can still be enforced.
2. Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal (Articles 10-15)
• Number of Arbitrators: The Model Law allows parties to decide the number of arbitrators. If no
decision is made, a single arbitrator is assumed.
• Appointment and Challenge of Arbitrators: Parties can agree on procedures for appointing and
challenging arbitrators. If they cannot agree, the court or another authority may appoint an
arbitrator.

www.prolegalminds.com 84 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3. Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal (Article 16)

• Competence-Competence Principle: The arbitral tribunal has the authority to determine its own
jurisdiction, including the validity of the arbitration agreement. This principle prevents courts from
unnecessarily intervening in the arbitration process.
4. Interim Measures and Preliminary Orders (Articles 17-17J)
• Interim Relief: The Model Law allows arbitrators to issue interim measures to preserve assets,
evidence, or status quo. Parties may also seek interim relief from courts if needed.
• Enforceability of Interim Measures: Interim measures issued by arbitral tribunals are
enforceable, making it easier for parties to protect their rights pending the final award.
5. Conduct of Arbitral Proceedings (Articles 18-27)
• Equal Treatment and Fairness: The Model Law mandates that parties be treated equally and
given a full opportunity to present their case.
• Party Autonomy in Procedure: Parties have the freedom to agree on procedural rules. In the
absence of an agreement, the tribunal has the discretion to conduct proceedings as it sees fit,
including setting timelines and rules for evidence.
6. Making of Arbitral Awards and Termination of Proceedings (Articles 28-33)
• Choice of Applicable Law: The Model Law allows parties to choose the substantive law
governing their dispute. If no choice is made, the tribunal applies the law it deems appropriate.
• Finality and Binding Nature: The arbitral award is binding on the parties and has the same effect
as a court judgment. The award must be made in writing, signed by the arbitrator(s), and delivered
to the parties.
7. Recourse Against Arbitral Award (Article 34)
• Setting Aside an Award: The Model Law provides limited grounds for setting aside an award,
such as incapacity, invalidity of the arbitration agreement, denial of due process, excess of
authority, or conflict with public policy. This provision limits judicial interference, ensuring that
awards are respected and enforced unless serious procedural issues arise.
8. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (Articles 35-36)
• Recognition and Enforcement: The Model Law mandates that arbitral awards be recognized and
enforced across jurisdictions, similar to the New York Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
• Grounds for Refusal: Enforcement can only be refused on specific grounds, such as incapacity,
invalidity, denial of due process, excess of authority, or public policy. This narrow scope ensures
that awards are honored internationally.

Benefits of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration

1. Uniformity Across Jurisdictions
The Model Law provides a standardized framework that is adopted by many countries, creating
consistency in arbitration practices. This uniformity helps parties understand and trust the
arbitration process regardless of where the arbitration is seated.
2. Reduced Court Intervention
By limiting court involvement, the Model Law ensures that arbitration remains an autonomous and
efficient process. Parties benefit from a streamlined process with fewer delays and obstacles,
reinforcing arbitration as a preferred method for resolving international disputes.
3. Encouragement of Party Autonomy
The Model Law emphasizes party autonomy, allowing parties to define their own procedures and
rules for arbitration. This flexibility makes arbitration more attractive and adaptable to the needs
of international businesses.

www.prolegalminds.com 85 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4. Clear Framework for Enforcement of Awards

The Model Law’s provisions on the recognition and enforcement of awards ensure that arbitral
decisions are binding and enforceable globally. This consistency builds confidence in the
arbitration process as parties are assured that awards will be upheld across jurisdictions.
5. Accessibility for Cross-Border Disputes
The Model Law provides a neutral framework that bridges differences between legal systems,
making it easier for parties from different countries to engage in arbitration. This accessibility
fosters international trade and investment by providing a reliable dispute resolution mechanism.

Implementation of the UNCITRAL Model Law in India

India adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which
governs both domestic and international arbitration in India. The Act aligns closely with the Model
Law, incorporating key principles such as:
• Party Autonomy and Reduced Court Intervention: The Act gives parties control over the
arbitration process and limits judicial interference, particularly in international arbitration.
• Recognition of Foreign Awards: Following the Model Law and the New York Convention, the Act
provides for the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards.
• Competence-Competence: The Act allows arbitral tribunals to determine their own jurisdiction,
adhering to the Model Law’s emphasis on tribunal autonomy.

Key Case Law: Bharat Aluminum Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum Technical Services Inc. (BALCO) (2012)
In the BALCO case, the Supreme Court of India emphasized that the UNCITRAL Model Law
principles apply to international commercial arbitration seated outside India, reinforcing the
autonomy of international arbitration and reducing court intervention. This landmark case aligned
India’s arbitration regime with international standards and underscored India’s commitment to
promoting a favorable environment for cross-border arbitration.

Conclusion
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985, has transformed
international arbitration by providing a consistent, efficient, and predictable framework for
resolving cross-border disputes. By promoting party autonomy, limiting court intervention, and
setting standards for enforcement, the Model Law has made arbitration a viable and attractive
alternative to litigation for international businesses. India’s adoption of the Model Law through the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, demonstrates its commitment to fostering a pro-arbitration
regime, supporting the country’s ambitions to become a global arbitration hub.

18. Geneva Convention 1927

The Geneva Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1927, also known as the
Geneva Convention of 1927, was one of the earliest international agreements to recognize and
enforce foreign arbitral awards. The Convention aimed to promote international trade and
investment by providing a framework for the cross-border enforcement of arbitration awards,
thereby ensuring that businesses could rely on the validity of arbitration decisions made in foreign
jurisdictions. It was later superseded by the New York Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958.

www.prolegalminds.com 86 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Objectives of the Geneva Convention, 1927

1. Promote Cross-Border Arbitration: The Convention was created to encourage the use of
arbitration for resolving international commercial disputes, which in turn would promote
international trade and economic cooperation.
2. Provide Legal Framework for Enforcement: By establishing a set of rules for recognizing and
enforcing foreign arbitral awards, the Convention sought to give awards legal effect across
borders.
3. Limit Grounds for Refusal of Enforcement: The Convention aimed to reduce the obstacles to
enforcement by limiting the grounds on which enforcement of an arbitral award could be refused.

Key Provisions of the Geneva Convention, 1927

The Geneva Convention laid down specific conditions for the recognition and enforcement of
foreign arbitral awards.
1. Scope of Application
• The Convention applied to arbitral awards made in one contracting state and sought to be
enforced in another contracting state. It was intended primarily for commercial disputes.
• It was applicable to awards resulting from arbitration agreements where parties agreed to
submit disputes to arbitration.
2. Requirements for Enforceability
Under Article 1 of the Convention, an arbitral award would be recognized and enforceable only if:
• The award was made pursuant to a valid arbitration agreement.
• The award was final and binding on the parties, without any further appeal available under the
laws governing the arbitration.
• The award was not contrary to the public policy or laws of the country where enforcement was
sought.
3. Burden of Proof on the Award Creditor
• The Convention required the party seeking enforcement (the award creditor) to prove that the
award met the conditions for enforcement. This included demonstrating that the award was final,
binding, and made under a valid arbitration agreement.
• The award creditor was required to submit a certified copy of the award and the arbitration
agreement, along with any other relevant documentation.
4. Limited Grounds for Refusal of Enforcement
Article 2 of the Convention provided limited grounds for refusing enforcement of a foreign arbitral
award:
• If the award was annulled or suspended by a competent authority in the country where it was
made.
• If enforcement of the award would contravene the public policy of the country where
enforcement was sought.
5. Requirement of Reciprocity
The Geneva Convention required reciprocity among contracting states, meaning that an arbitral
award could only be enforced if the country where the award was made was also a signatory to the
Convention. This reciprocity requirement limited the Convention’s effectiveness in some
jurisdictions.

www.prolegalminds.com 87 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

6. Final and Binding Nature of Awards

The Convention stipulated that the arbitral award must be final and binding, meaning it could not
be appealed or further contested in the country where it was made. This ensured that only
conclusive awards were subject to cross-border enforcement.

Limitations of the Geneva Convention, 1927

While the Geneva Convention was a significant step toward facilitating the enforcement of foreign
arbitral awards, it had several limitations:
1. Complex Requirements
The requirement for the award creditor to prove that the award was final, binding, and made under
a valid arbitration agreement made the enforcement process complex and burdensome.
2. Limited Applicability Due to Reciprocity Requirement
The reciprocity requirement limited the scope of the Convention to awards made in contracting
states only. This restriction reduced its effectiveness in promoting cross-border arbitration and
enforcing awards from non-contracting states.
3. Limited Grounds for Refusal but Broad Interpretation
Although the Convention aimed to restrict grounds for refusing enforcement, the “public policy”
exception was subject to broad interpretation by national courts, leading to inconsistent
enforcement practices across countries.
4. Superseded by the New York Convention, 1958
Due to these limitations, the Geneva Convention was eventually replaced by the New York
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958, which provided
a more robust and streamlined framework for enforcing foreign awards.
Legacy of the Geneva Convention, 1927
The Geneva Convention, despite its limitations, was a foundational step toward creating a globally
recognized framework for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. It paved the way for the
development of the New York Convention, which addressed many of its shortcomings and remains
the primary treaty governing the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards worldwide.

Conclusion
The Geneva Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1927, represented an
important early effort to facilitate international commercial arbitration by creating a legal
structure for recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards. Although it was later replaced by
the more effective New York Convention, the Geneva Convention laid the groundwork for modern
arbitration laws and practices by establishing key principles such as finality, reciprocity, and
limited grounds for refusal, all of which remain relevant in the current international arbitration
framework.

www.prolegalminds.com 88 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

19. New York Convention 1958

New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958
The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,
commonly referred to as the New York Convention, was adopted in 1958 and is one of the most
important international treaties governing international commercial arbitration. The Convention
provides a legal framework for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and
arbitration agreements among its member states, thereby facilitating international trade and
investment by ensuring that arbitral awards are recognized and enforceable worldwide.

Objectives of the New York Convention

1. Promotion of International Commercial Arbitration
The New York Convention encourages the use of arbitration for resolving cross-border commercial
disputes, providing a reliable and enforceable alternative to court litigation.
2. Uniformity in Enforcing Arbitral Awards
The Convention seeks to create consistency and predictability in the recognition and enforcement
of arbitral awards across jurisdictions, reducing legal obstacles and making awards enforceable
with minimal court intervention.
3. Encouragement of Party Autonomy
The Convention reinforces the principle of party autonomy, recognizing that parties can freely
choose arbitration as their preferred dispute resolution mechanism and ensuring that the resulting
awards are binding and enforceable.

Key Provisions of the New York Convention

The New York Convention provides a streamlined process for the recognition and enforcement of
foreign arbitral awards, covering various aspects of cross-border arbitration.
1. Scope of Application (Article I)
• The Convention applies to arbitral awards made in a state other than the one where recognition
and enforcement are sought, as well as awards that are not considered domestic in the enforcing
country.
• Countries can make two reservations:
• Reciprocity Reservation: The Convention applies only to awards made in other contracting
states.
• Commercial Reservation: The Convention applies only to disputes that are considered
“commercial” under the national laws of the enforcing country.
2. Recognition and Enforcement of Awards (Article III)
• Recognition and Enforcement: Article III mandates that each contracting state recognize and
enforce arbitral awards in accordance with its national rules of procedure, subject to the
provisions of the Convention.
• No Substantive Review: Courts are not allowed to review the merits of the arbitral award or re-
evaluate the evidence. This principle ensures that awards remain binding and enforceable without
unnecessary intervention.
3. Documents Required for Enforcement (Article IV)
• Application Requirements: To enforce an award, the award creditor must submit the original
award (or a certified copy) and the original arbitration agreement (or a certified copy).
• Translation: If the documents are not in the language of the enforcing court, the applicant may
need to provide a certified translation.

www.prolegalminds.com 89 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4. Grounds for Refusal of Enforcement (Article V)

Article V of the Convention lists limited and specific grounds on which the recognition or
enforcement of an arbitral award may be refused. These grounds are narrowly construed to
promote enforcement and discourage unnecessary challenges:
• Invalid Arbitration Agreement: If the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law chosen
by the parties or, in the absence of a choice, under the law of the country where the award was
made.
• Lack of Due Process: If a party was not given proper notice of the arbitration proceedings or was
otherwise unable to present its case.
• Excess of Authority: If the arbitral award deals with matters not covered by the arbitration
agreement. However, partial enforcement is allowed if part of the award falls within the
agreement.
• Improper Composition of Arbitral Tribunal or Procedure: If the arbitral tribunal or the arbitration
procedure did not conform to the parties’ agreement or the applicable law.
• Award Not Yet Binding or Set Aside: If the award is not yet binding on the parties or has been
set aside or suspended by a competent authority in the country where the award was made.
• Public Policy: If the enforcement of the award would violate the public policy of the country
where enforcement is sought. This is the most flexible ground for refusal, but it is interpreted
narrowly by most jurisdictions to prevent excessive interference with foreign awards.
5. Autonomy and Severability of the Arbitration Agreement (Implied Principle)
• The New York Convention implicitly recognizes the severability of the arbitration agreement,
meaning that the arbitration clause in a contract remains valid even if the main contract is
challenged or terminated. This principle reinforces party autonomy and ensures that disputes can
be arbitrated even if there are issues with the underlying contract.

Importance of the New York Convention

The New York Convention is often regarded as one of the most successful international treaties in
the field of commercial law due to its global acceptance and practical impact on international
arbitration. Key aspects of its significance include:
1. Global Reach and Adoption
With over 170 contracting states, the Convention enjoys widespread acceptance, making it
possible for arbitral awards to be recognized and enforced in most countries around the world.
2. Facilitates Cross-Border Trade and Investment
The Convention provides businesses with confidence that if they choose arbitration, the resulting
awards will be enforceable in other countries. This assurance promotes international trade and
investment by reducing the risks associated with cross-border commercial transactions.
3. Uniformity and Predictability
The Convention establishes a uniform standard for enforcing arbitral awards, creating
predictability and consistency for businesses and legal practitioners. This uniformity encourages
parties to choose arbitration as their preferred dispute resolution method for international
transactions.

www.prolegalminds.com 90 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

20. Recognition and enforcement of foreign award

The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards refer to the process by which a court
in one country validates and enforces an arbitral award issued in another country. This process is
governed primarily by the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards, 1958 (New York Convention) and, for pre-1958 awards, by the Geneva
Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1927.
Foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced by local courts based on specific criteria
outlined in international treaties and national laws. This process is critical for the efficacy of
international arbitration, as it ensures that arbitration remains a reliable and enforceable
alternative to litigation for cross-border disputes.

Key Framework for Recognition and Enforcement

1. New York Convention, 1958
The New York Convention is the most widely adopted international treaty for the recognition and
enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Over 170 countries have signed the Convention, which
requires contracting states to recognize and enforce arbitral awards made in other contracting
states with limited grounds for refusal.
2. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985
Many countries have adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law, which complements the New York
Convention by providing a consistent framework for arbitration. The Model Law guides courts on
the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards, streamlining the process and ensuring
compatibility with international standards.
3. National Legislation
Most countries, including India, have incorporated the New York Convention into their domestic
legislation, which governs the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. In India, the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, incorporates these principles, aligning the country’s
arbitration framework with international standards.

Steps for Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards

The recognition and enforcement process generally involves filing an application with a local
court, submitting the necessary documents, and going through a judicial review based on limited
grounds for refusal.
1. Application for Recognition and Enforcement
The party seeking enforcement (award creditor) must file an application in a court with jurisdiction
in the country where enforcement is sought. This application typically includes:
• The original arbitral award or a certified copy.
• The original arbitration agreement or a certified copy.
• If needed, a certified translation of the documents into the language of the enforcing court.
2. Judicial Review on Limited Grounds
The court reviews the application to determine whether the award meets the standards for
recognition and enforcement. Under the New York Convention (Article V), the grounds for refusing
recognition or enforcement are limited to ensure that awards are enforced consistently across
jurisdictions. These grounds include:
• Invalid Arbitration Agreement: If the arbitration agreement is invalid under the chosen law or
the law where the award was made.

www.prolegalminds.com 91 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

• Lack of Due Process: If a party was not given adequate notice of the arbitration proceedings or
was otherwise unable to present their case.
• Excess of Authority: If the arbitral tribunal ruled on matters outside the scope of the arbitration
agreement.
• Improper Composition or Procedure: If the tribunal’s composition or the arbitration procedure
did not conform to the agreement or applicable law.
• Non-Binding or Set-Aside Award: If the award has been annulled or suspended in the country
where it was issued.
• Public Policy: If enforcing the award would violate the enforcing country’s public policy. This
ground is often interpreted narrowly to prevent excessive interference with foreign awards.
3. Recognition of the Award
Recognition refers to a court’s acknowledgment of the legal validity of the award, allowing it to
have the same status as a court judgment. Once recognized, the award can be enforced through
the court’s execution mechanisms if the losing party (award debtor) does not comply voluntarily.
4. Enforcement of the Award
Enforcement involves using legal procedures to ensure compliance with the award. This may
include attaching or seizing assets, garnishing wages, or other remedies available under the law.
Once the court recognizes the award as binding, it can enforce the award as if it were a domestic
judgment.

Recognition and Enforcement in India

India is a signatory to the New York Convention, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,
governs the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Part II of the Act incorporates
the New York Convention, allowing foreign awards to be recognized and enforced in Indian courts
under specific conditions.
1. Jurisdiction and Application
The application for enforcement of a foreign award can be filed in any High Court in India with
jurisdiction over the area where the award debtor’s assets are located or where the award debtor
resides.
2. Grounds for Refusal under Indian Law
Section 48 of the Act specifies the grounds for refusing enforcement, aligning with the New York
Convention’s criteria, including public policy, lack of due process, invalid arbitration agreement,
and non-binding nature of the award.
3. Judicial Approach in India
Indian courts have adopted a pro-arbitration stance in recent years, generally upholding foreign
arbitral awards and narrowly interpreting the grounds for refusal. Indian courts recognize that
their role is not to re-evaluate the merits of the award but to ensure that it meets basic legal
standards.
4. Public Policy Consideration
Indian courts have limited the interpretation of “public policy” to only include fundamental
principles of law, morality, and justice. In the landmark case of Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v.
General Electric Co. (1994), the Supreme Court of India held that enforcement could be refused
only if the award violated basic principles of justice or national interest, setting a precedent for
minimal intervention.

www.prolegalminds.com 92 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Benefits of the New York Convention for Enforcement

1. Global Applicability
The New York Convention’s wide adoption facilitates the enforcement of arbitral awards in most
major trading nations, providing assurance that awards will be recognized internationally.
2. Consistency and Predictability
By establishing uniform standards, the Convention creates a predictable legal environment for
international arbitration, making it a more attractive option for cross-border dispute resolution.
3. Party Autonomy and Reduced Court Intervention
The Convention upholds the principle of party autonomy, ensuring that arbitration agreements and
awards are respected with minimal court interference, reinforcing arbitration as an independent
dispute resolution mechanism.
4. Encouragement of Investment and Trade
The Convention’s enforcement mechanism provides businesses with confidence in the
enforceability of arbitration awards, thereby promoting global trade and investment.

Challenges in Enforcement
1. Interpretation of Public Policy
The public policy exception remains a flexible ground, and its interpretation varies across
jurisdictions. Some countries apply it narrowly, while others may interpret it broadly, leading to
inconsistent enforcement practices.
2. Execution Delays
Although the Convention streamlines recognition, actual enforcement may still encounter
procedural delays in certain jurisdictions, particularly where asset tracing and seizure are
involved.
3. Non-Signatory States
The New York Convention applies only to awards made in contracting states. Awards from non-
signatory states may not be enforceable under the Convention and may require separate legal
action.

Landmark Case Laws

1. Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1994)
In this case, the Supreme Court of India narrowly interpreted the “public policy” exception, limiting
it to fundamental principles of justice, morality, and national interest. This case set a pro-
enforcement precedent, limiting judicial interference.
2. Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa (2013)
This case reinforced the narrow interpretation of public policy, ruling that courts should avoid
reviewing the merits of an award and focus only on the grounds permitted by the New York
Convention. The case reaffirmed India’s commitment to minimal intervention in foreign arbitral
awards.
3. BG Group Plc v. Republic of Argentina (2014, U.S. Supreme Court)
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the enforcement of an arbitral award against Argentina, despite
Argentina’s argument that local litigation requirements had not been met. This case underscored
the importance of respecting arbitral autonomy and limited judicial intervention.

www.prolegalminds.com 93 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Conclusion
The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards are critical to the success of
international arbitration, as they provide businesses with confidence that awards will be upheld
across jurisdictions. The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards has established a global standard for enforcement, ensuring that arbitral awards
can be recognized and enforced with minimal judicial interference. By limiting grounds for refusal,
the Convention facilitates the swift and consistent enforcement of awards worldwide, making
arbitration a reliable and effective method of cross-border dispute resolution. Through pro-
arbitration reforms and supportive judicial rulings, countries like India have embraced the
Convention’s principles, reinforcing arbitration’s role as a preferred mechanism for resolving
international commercial disputes.

21. Uncitral Model Law on international commercial mediation and International

Settlement agreements resulting from MEDIATION, 2018.

The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Mediation and International Settlement
Agreements Resulting from Mediation, 2018 (2018 UNCITRAL Model Law) was developed by the
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) to provide a framework for
the use, recognition, and enforcement of international commercial mediation and mediation
settlements. This Model Law serves as an amendment and extension to the UNCITRAL Model Law
on International Commercial Conciliation, 2002, and it aligns with the United Nations Convention
on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (the Singapore Convention
on Mediation), 2019.
The 2018 Model Law aims to create uniform standards for international mediation and provide a
mechanism for the enforcement of settlement agreements, enhancing mediation as a reliable
method for resolving cross-border disputes.

Objectives of the 2018 UNCITRAL Model Law

1. Promotion of Mediation as a Dispute Resolution Mechanism
The Model Law encourages the use of mediation for international commercial disputes, providing a
structured framework that promotes mediation as a trustworthy alternative to arbitration and
litigation.
2. Legal Recognition of International Settlement Agreements
The Model Law ensures that settlement agreements resulting from mediation are recognized and
enforceable across jurisdictions, adding a layer of legal certainty to the mediation process.
3. Harmonization of Mediation Laws
By providing a consistent framework, the Model Law encourages countries to adopt similar rules
and standards for mediation, reducing the variability of laws across jurisdictions and making
cross-border mediation more predictable.
4. Alignment with the Singapore Convention on Mediation
The Model Law complements the Singapore Convention, which allows for the enforcement of
international settlement agreements. This alignment strengthens the global framework for cross-
border mediation and increases the enforceability of mediation agreements.

www.prolegalminds.com 94 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Provisions of the 2018 UNCITRAL Model Law

The 2018 UNCITRAL Model Law covers various aspects of international mediation, including the
recognition and enforcement of settlement agreements, the mediation process, and the duties of
mediators and parties.
1. Scope and Application (Articles 1-3)
• International Commercial Mediation: The Model Law applies to international commercial
mediation where parties agree to submit their disputes to mediation. It applies to both pending
disputes and disputes that may arise in the future under an existing mediation agreement.
• Cross-Border Nature: A mediation is considered international if the parties are from different
countries, or if the mediation involves cross-border transactions or assets.

2. Definition and Form of Mediation and Settlement Agreements (Articles 4-5)

• Mediation Definition: Mediation is defined as a process where a neutral third party (the
mediator) assists parties in reaching an amicable settlement of their dispute without imposing a
binding decision.
• Form of Settlement Agreement: The Model Law does not prescribe a strict form for settlement
agreements. However, it requires the agreement to be in writing and signed by the parties to
ensure that it is identifiable and enforceable.

3. Recognition and Enforcement of International Settlement Agreements (Articles 6-7)

• Enforceability of Settlement Agreements: The Model Law provides that international
settlement agreements resulting from mediation are enforceable in the same way as arbitral
awards or court judgments.
• Procedure for Enforcement: A party seeking enforcement must provide a signed copy of the
settlement agreement and evidence that the agreement resulted from mediation. This can include
a statement from the mediator or the institution that conducted the mediation.
• Alignment with Singapore Convention: This provision aligns with the Singapore Convention on
Mediation, ensuring that mediated settlement agreements are enforceable internationally, giving
them legal weight comparable to other cross-border dispute resolution outcomes.

4. Grounds for Refusing Enforcement (Article 8)

Article 8 provides limited and specific grounds on which recognition or enforcement of a
settlement agreement may be refused. These grounds include:
• Incapacity: If a party to the settlement agreement was incapacitated at the time of signing.
• Invalidity: If the settlement agreement is not valid under the law it was subjected to or the law of
the enforcing country.
• Non-Finality or Non-Binding Nature: If the settlement agreement is not final and binding on the
parties.
• Public Policy: If enforcement would violate the public policy of the country where enforcement is
sought.
• Improper Conduct by Mediator: If the mediator failed to disclose conflicts of interest, engaged
in fraudulent conduct, or was otherwise involved in serious misconduct affecting the mediation
process.

www.prolegalminds.com 95 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

5. Mediator’s Role and Duties (Articles 9-10)

• Impartiality and Independence: The Model Law emphasizes that mediators must act impartially
and disclose any circumstances that might affect their independence or create a conflict of
interest.
• Confidentiality: The Model Law mandates confidentiality of information obtained during
mediation. Mediators and parties cannot use or disclose confidential information without consent,
safeguarding the privacy of the process.
6. Conduct of Mediation Proceedings (Articles 11-12)
• Flexibility in Process: The Model Law allows parties significant flexibility to determine the
procedure of mediation, reflecting the principle of party autonomy. The mediator can tailor the
process according to the needs of the parties.
• Termination of Mediation: The Model Law specifies circumstances under which mediation can
be terminated, including when parties reach a settlement, when one or both parties withdraw from
mediation, or when the mediator concludes that further efforts are unlikely to resolve the dispute.
7. Interaction with Other Legal Proceedings (Article 13)
• Stay of Court Proceedings: If parties agree to submit a dispute to mediation, the Model Law
allows for a temporary stay of court or arbitration proceedings related to the same dispute, giving
mediation a fair chance to succeed.
• Effect on Limitation Periods: The Model Law provides that limitation periods for filing lawsuits
or arbitration claims are paused while mediation is in progress, ensuring that parties are not
penalized for attempting to resolve their dispute amicably.

Significance of the 2018 UNCITRAL Model Law

1. Legal Certainty for Cross-Border Mediation
The Model Law provides a predictable legal framework for international mediation, making it a
more viable and reliable option for cross-border commercial disputes. This legal certainty
encourages businesses to opt for mediation, knowing that the resulting settlement agreements
will be recognized and enforceable.
2. Uniform Standards for Mediation Worldwide
The Model Law encourages countries to adopt a consistent approach to mediation, reducing the
variation in laws across jurisdictions. This harmonization simplifies mediation for businesses
operating in multiple countries and promotes mediation as an international standard.
3. Increased Trust in Mediation
By setting out clear guidelines for enforcing mediation agreements, the Model Law enhances trust
in mediation as a dispute resolution mechanism. Parties are assured that mediated settlements
will carry legal weight comparable to other forms of dispute resolution.
4. Complementarity with the Singapore Convention on Mediation
The Model Law complements the Singapore Convention, which provides a framework for the
enforcement of mediated settlement agreements. Together, they create a robust global system
for recognizing and enforcing mediation settlements, increasing mediation’s attractiveness as a
cross-border dispute resolution tool.

Implementation and Adoption

Countries are encouraged to adopt the Model Law or align their national laws with its provisions to
create a uniform global framework for international commercial mediation. This adoption
facilitates the enforcement of mediated settlement agreements worldwide, building a more
accessible and efficient international mediation landscape.

www.prolegalminds.com 96 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Example: Application of the Model Law in Practice

• International Business Dispute: Suppose two companies, one from Germany and one from Japan,
enter into a mediation process to resolve a contractual dispute. They reach a mediated settlement
agreement, which the German company later seeks to enforce in Japan. Under the Model Law and
the Singapore Convention, the Japanese court can recognize and enforce the agreement, provided
the settlement meets the Model Law’s criteria. This predictability promotes confidence in
mediation and enhances its credibility for cross-border disputes.
Conclusion
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Mediation and International Settlement
Agreements Resulting from Mediation, 2018, provides a comprehensive framework for mediation,
promoting its use in resolving international disputes and ensuring that mediated settlements are
recognized and enforceable. By harmonizing standards and aligning with the Singapore
Convention, the Model Law strengthens mediation’s role in global commerce, offering parties an
efficient, reliable, and enforceable alternative to litigation and arbitration. This Model Law
represents a significant advancement in international commercial mediation, supporting the
growing need for accessible and effective dispute resolution in an interconnected world.

22. Dispute resolution

Dispute Resolution: Overview, Types, and Mechanisms

Dispute resolution encompasses a variety of methods used to resolve conflicts between parties
without resorting to traditional litigation in court. Effective dispute resolution is crucial in both
personal and commercial contexts, as it provides fair, efficient, and legally binding solutions to
disputes. Broadly, dispute resolution mechanisms fall into two main categories: Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR), which includes non-litigation methods like arbitration and mediation,
and Judicial Resolution, which involves traditional court processes.

Types of Dispute Resolution

1. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
ADR refers to methods of resolving disputes outside of traditional courts. ADR is generally
quicker, less formal, and often more cost-effective than litigation. ADR includes several key
mechanisms:
• Arbitration: A binding dispute resolution method where a neutral arbitrator makes a final
decision. Arbitration is often used in commercial and international disputes, and the decision
(award) is legally binding and enforceable like a court judgment.
• Mediation: A voluntary, non-binding process where a mediator facilitates negotiations between
the parties to help them reach a mutually acceptable solution. Mediation is widely used in family,
employment, and business disputes due to its focus on collaboration.
• Conciliation: Similar to mediation, but with the conciliator playing a more active role in
suggesting solutions. This method is less formal than arbitration and is commonly used in labor
and commercial disputes.
• Negotiation: The most informal form of ADR, negotiation involves direct discussions between
parties to resolve their dispute without a third-party facilitator. This method allows parties to
maintain control over the outcome.
• Lok Adalat: In India, Lok Adalats (People’s Courts) are used to resolve certain types of cases
quickly through compromise. Lok Adalat awards are binding and have the same effect as court
decrees, making them an effective ADR mechanism.

www.prolegalminds.com 97 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2. Judicial Resolution
Judicial resolution, also known as litigation, involves formal court proceedings where a judge or
jury determines the outcome. Although litigation is often a last resort due to its cost, formality,
and time consumption, it remains necessary for disputes involving complex legal questions,
criminal matters, or cases where one party seeks a legally enforceable remedy that ADR cannot
provide.
3. Hybrid Mechanisms
Some dispute resolution mechanisms combine elements of ADR and traditional litigation:
• Mediation-Arbitration (Med-Arb): Parties attempt to resolve their dispute through mediation. If
they cannot reach an agreement, they proceed to arbitration for a binding decision. This method
offers flexibility and finality.
• Arbitration-Mediation (Arb-Med): The process starts with arbitration, but before the award is
announced, parties may attempt mediation. If mediation fails, the arbitration award is issued. Arb-
Med is useful when parties desire a binding outcome but prefer to settle amicably.

Key Characteristics of Different Dispute Resolution Methods

Method Binding or Non-Binding Formal or Informal Neutral Party Role Common Uses
Arbitration Binding Formal Arbitrator makes decision Commercial, construction, international
disputes
Mediation Non-Binding Informal Mediator facilitates talks Family, employment, community
disputes
Conciliation Non-Binding Informal Conciliator suggests solutions Labor, commercial disputes
Negotiation Non-Binding Informal No third-party involvement Business contracts, personal
disputes
Litigation Binding Formal Judge/jury decides outcome Criminal, constitutional, complex legal
cases

Importance of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

1. Efficiency and Cost Savings
ADR methods like arbitration, mediation, and conciliation often resolve disputes faster than court
litigation, reducing the financial and emotional costs associated with prolonged legal battles.
2. Confidentiality
ADR processes are generally private and confidential, unlike court proceedings, which are public.
This confidentiality is especially valued in sensitive cases, such as family disputes or commercial
matters involving trade secrets.
3. Preservation of Relationships
Non-adversarial processes like mediation and negotiation help preserve relationships by
encouraging cooperation and mutual understanding. This is crucial in family, employment, and
business contexts, where ongoing relationships are beneficial.
4. Flexibility and Control
ADR methods provide parties with more control over the process, as they can choose the rules,
procedures, and even the decision-maker. This flexibility allows for tailored solutions that suit the
needs of both parties.
5. Reduced Court Backlog
By diverting disputes from the traditional court system, ADR helps reduce the burden on courts,
allowing them to focus on cases that require judicial intervention.

www.prolegalminds.com 98 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Legal Framework for Dispute Resolution in India

India has a comprehensive legal framework for ADR under several statutes:
• Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Based on the UNCITRAL Model Law, this Act governs
arbitration and conciliation in India, covering both domestic and international disputes.
• Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Section 89 and Order X): Encourages courts to refer cases to ADR
mechanisms such as arbitration, mediation, and Lok Adalat.
• Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987: Establishes Lok Adalats as an official ADR mechanism,
particularly for resolving pending cases through compromise and settlement.
• Commercial Courts Act, 2015: Mandates pre-institution mediation for commercial disputes,
emphasizing ADR in the business context.
• Family Courts Act, 1984: Encourages conciliation and mediation in family disputes, such as
divorce, custody, and maintenance.

Examples of Effective Dispute Resolution in Practice

1. International Business Dispute: Two companies from different countries may opt for arbitration
due to its enforceability under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of
Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958, which ensures the award can be enforced in multiple jurisdictions.
2. Family Mediation: In a divorce case, mediation allows the couple to negotiate terms regarding
custody, visitation, and division of property in a private, non-adversarial setting, preserving their
relationship for the benefit of their children.
3. Labor Dispute: A conciliation officer may be appointed to mediate a conflict between a
company and its employees, helping them negotiate fair terms without resorting to strikes or
litigation.
4. Commercial Mediation under the Commercial Courts Act: In a dispute between two companies,
the parties may undergo pre-institution mediation as required by law, potentially resolving the
issue without going to court and saving both time and legal expenses.

Challenges in Dispute Resolution

1. Lack of Awareness and Training
In many regions, there is limited awareness about ADR options, and even where ADR is available,
parties may lack access to skilled mediators or arbitrators.
2. Enforceability of Agreements
While arbitral awards are enforceable as decrees, non-binding agreements from mediation or
conciliation may require additional steps for enforcement, depending on the parties’ compliance.
3. Court Intervention in Arbitration
In some jurisdictions, excessive court intervention can undermine the autonomy of the arbitration
process, delaying resolutions and adding costs.
4. Quality and Integrity of Neutrals
The effectiveness of ADR depends on the quality, neutrality, and integrity of mediators,
arbitrators, and conciliators. Inconsistent standards for appointing neutrals can affect the
outcome and credibility of ADR processes.

www.prolegalminds.com 99 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Conclusion
Dispute resolution offers a range of methods tailored to meet the diverse needs of parties,
whether they seek binding solutions or amicable settlements. ADR provides time-saving, cost-
effective, and confidential alternatives to litigation, promoting cooperation and flexibility. While
traditional court processes are essential for certain complex cases, the growth of ADR
mechanisms like arbitration, mediation, and Lok Adalats demonstrates a shift toward a more
adaptable, accessible, and efficient approach to justice. Through robust legal frameworks and
increased awareness, dispute resolution can continue to evolve and serve as a valuable resource
for resolving conflicts in an increasingly interconnected world.

23. Singapore Convention on Mediation , 2019

The United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from

Mediation, also known as the Singapore Convention on Mediation, was adopted in 2019 by the
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). The Convention provides a
framework for the cross-border enforcement of settlement agreements resulting from mediation.
This landmark treaty aims to enhance the credibility and reliability of mediation as an alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) method by making mediated settlement agreements enforceable across
member states, similar to the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards under the New York
Convention, 1958.

The Singapore Convention on Mediation is a key development in international dispute resolution,

offering a predictable and efficient means of enforcing mediated agreements in cross-border
disputes, thereby encouraging parties to use mediation for resolving international commercial
conflicts.

Objectives of the Singapore Convention on Mediation

1. Promote Mediation as a Reliable ADR Method
The Convention encourages businesses and individuals to use mediation to resolve international
disputes by providing a clear and enforceable outcome, making mediation a credible alternative to
arbitration and litigation.
2. Facilitate Cross-Border Trade and Investment
By providing a mechanism for enforcing international settlement agreements, the Convention
reduces the risks associated with cross-border business transactions and fosters international
trade and investment.
3. Harmonize Global Standards for Mediation
The Convention creates a uniform framework for the enforcement of mediated agreements across
jurisdictions, making international commercial mediation more accessible and predictable.
4. Reduce Dependence on Traditional Litigation
The Convention offers a streamlined enforcement process, reducing the need for traditional
litigation to enforce settlement agreements and promoting a quicker resolution of disputes.

www.prolegalminds.com 100 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Provisions of the Singapore Convention on Mediation

The Convention establishes the process and conditions for the enforcement of settlement
agreements resulting from mediation.
1. Scope of Application (Article 1)
• International Commercial Mediation: The Convention applies to settlement agreements
resulting from mediation that resolve international commercial disputes. It does not apply to
domestic disputes or to agreements related to family, inheritance, or employment matters.
• Cross-Border Nature: An agreement qualifies as “international” if the parties to the settlement
are located in different countries, or if the obligations under the agreement are to be performed in
a different country.
2. Enforcement of International Settlement Agreements (Article 3)
• Direct Enforcement: The Convention allows parties to directly enforce mediated settlement
agreements in the courts of contracting states without having to litigate the terms.
• Application for Relief: A party seeking to enforce a mediated settlement agreement can apply
directly to a competent authority in the enforcing state, providing a copy of the agreement and
evidence that the agreement resulted from mediation.
3. Documents Required for Enforcement (Article 4)
• Settlement Agreement: The applicant must provide the original signed settlement agreement or
a certified copy.
• Proof of Mediation: The applicant must provide evidence that the agreement was reached
through mediation. This can include the mediator’s signature, a mediation institution’s statement,
or other evidence acceptable to the enforcing authority.
4. Grounds for Refusing Enforcement (Article 5)
The Convention provides limited grounds for refusing enforcement to protect against abuse while
ensuring that mediated settlements are generally enforceable:
• Incapacity of Parties: If a party was legally incapacitated at the time of signing.
• Invalidity of Agreement: If the settlement agreement is not valid under the law it is subject to, or
under the law of the enforcing state.
• Subsequent Modification: If the terms of the agreement have been modified, or the obligations
have already been performed.
• Public Policy: If enforcing the agreement would violate the public policy of the enforcing state.
• Improper Conduct by Mediator: If there is evidence of serious misconduct, such as fraud,
coercion, or failure to disclose a conflict of interest by the mediator.
5. Exclusions from the Convention’s Scope (Article 1)
The Convention does not apply to:
• Settlement Agreements Approved by a Court: Agreements that have been approved or
concluded in court or are enforceable as a court judgment.
• Arbitral Awards: The Convention does not apply to settlement agreements that are enforceable
as arbitral awards, as such awards are already covered under the New York Convention on the
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.

www.prolegalminds.com 101 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Benefits of the Singapore Convention on Mediation

1. Enhanced Global Credibility of Mediation

The Convention bolsters mediation’s status as a reliable and enforceable form of dispute
resolution by ensuring that mediated agreements are legally binding across borders, similar to
arbitration awards.
2. Efficient Dispute Resolution
The Convention’s streamlined process for enforcing mediated agreements offers parties a quicker,
less formal path to enforce their settlements compared to traditional litigation.
3. Increased Access to Justice
By simplifying enforcement, the Convention encourages businesses and individuals to consider
mediation as a primary method for resolving disputes, providing greater access to justice,
especially in cross-border contexts.
4. Preservation of Business Relationships
Mediation’s collaborative nature helps preserve relationships, which is particularly important in
business. The Convention reinforces this by providing legal certainty that mediated agreements
will be honored, making mediation an attractive option for businesses.
5. Support for International Trade
The Convention reduces risks for companies engaged in cross-border commerce by providing a
reliable enforcement mechanism for settlement agreements. This encourages investment and
trade, as businesses feel confident their agreements will be respected internationally.

Adoption and Implementation of the Singapore Convention on Mediation

The Convention came into force on September 12, 2020. As of now, many countries have signed
the Convention, indicating a global trend toward supporting mediation as an enforceable dispute
resolution method. Countries that adopt the Convention integrate its provisions into their national
laws, allowing their courts to recognize and enforce mediated settlement agreements in line with
the Convention’s standards.

Examples of Practical Application

• International Commercial Dispute: Suppose a company in Singapore mediates a contract
dispute with a company in India. They reach a settlement, which the Singaporean company later
seeks to enforce in India. Under the Singapore Convention, the Indian courts would recognize and
enforce the mediated settlement agreement, provided it meets the Convention’s requirements,
ensuring a predictable outcome.
• Mediation Settlement in a Cross-Border Trade Conflict: In a dispute between a French company
and a U.S. supplier, the parties agree to mediate and reach a settlement. If the U.S. supplier later
breaches the settlement terms, the French company can seek enforcement under the Convention
in U.S. courts, making the process efficient and less costly.

www.prolegalminds.com 102 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Challenges and Limitations

1. Limited Adoption
While the Convention has been widely signed, some major economies have yet to ratify it. Broader
adoption would enhance the Convention’s effectiveness by increasing the number of jurisdictions
where mediated agreements can be enforced.
2. Interpretation of Public Policy
The public policy exception is flexible and can be interpreted differently across jurisdictions,
potentially affecting the consistency of enforcement.

3. Variability in Mediation Standards

Differences in mediation practices and standards worldwide may create challenges in uniformly
enforcing mediated agreements. Harmonizing standards across jurisdictions could further
strengthen the Convention.
4. Mediator Misconduct
Allegations of mediator misconduct can be a complex ground for refusal of enforcement, requiring
courts to evaluate conduct during mediation, which may pose practical difficulties.

Conclusion
The Singapore Convention on Mediation represents a significant advancement in the field of
international dispute resolution. By providing a framework for enforcing cross-border settlement
agreements resulting from mediation, the Convention positions mediation as a globally viable and
effective method for resolving international commercial disputes. The Convention’s alignment
with the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Mediation and the 2018 amendments
further reinforces its role in creating a cohesive and predictable mediation framework. As more
countries adopt the Convention, it will encourage the use of mediation worldwide, providing
businesses with an efficient, enforceable, and cooperative means of resolving disputes in an
increasingly interconnected global market.

24.What is mediation? Explain the advantages and disadvantages of mediation.

What is Mediation?

Mediation is a voluntary, non-adversarial, and flexible method of Alternative Dispute Resolution

(ADR) where a neutral third party (mediator) facilitates communication and negotiation between
disputing parties to help them reach a mutually acceptable settlement. The mediator does not
impose a decision but enables the parties to find their own solution.
In India, mediation is governed by:

• Section 89 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (settlement of disputes outside the court).
• Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Part III: Conciliation includes mediation principles).
• Mediation Act, 2023 (new legislation providing a structured legal framework for mediation).

Definition of Mediation
Under the Mediation Act, 2023, mediation is defined as:
“A process where parties attempt to resolve their disputes amicably with the assistance of a
neutral third party called the mediator.”

www.prolegalminds.com 103 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Key Features of Mediation

1. Voluntary Process: Parties willingly participate and can withdraw at any stage.
2. Neutral Third Party: The mediator facilitates discussions impartially.
3. Confidentiality: Mediation proceedings are private, and information shared cannot be disclosed
or used in court.
4. Party Autonomy: The parties control the outcome, unlike a judge or arbitrator’s imposed
decision.
5. Informal Process: Mediation does not adhere to rigid procedural laws like the CPC or Evidence
Act.

Advantages of Mediation
1. Time-Efficient
• Mediation resolves disputes quickly compared to lengthy court processes.
• Example: Pre-litigation mediation under the Mediation Act, 2023 promotes speedy settlement.
2. Cost-Effective
• Mediation reduces costs associated with court fees, legal representation, and procedural delays.
3. Confidentiality
• Proceedings and outcomes remain private, protecting sensitive information.
• Section 22 of the Mediation Act, 2023 ensures confidentiality.
4. Preserves Relationships
• Mediation focuses on communication and compromise, preserving business, family, and
neighborly relationships.
• Example: Family disputes resolved amicably through mediation avoid bitterness.
5. Flexible and Informal
• Parties are not bound by strict legal procedures and can craft creative solutions.
6. Control of Outcome
• Parties retain control over the settlement terms instead of relying on court-imposed judgments.
7. Voluntary Compliance
• Settlement agreements in mediation are often complied with voluntarily since parties mutually
agree to the terms.
8. Court Support
• Courts encourage mediation through Section 89 of CPC and refer cases for amicable
settlement.

Disadvantages of Mediation
1. Non-Binding Nature
• Unless the settlement is formalized in writing, mediation outcomes lack enforceability.
• However, under the Mediation Act, 2023, a mediated settlement agreement is legally binding
and enforceable.
2. No Guarantee of Resolution
• Mediation may fail if parties are unwilling to cooperate, requiring them to resort to litigation or
arbitration.
3. Lack of Formal Evidence
• Mediators cannot collect or enforce evidence, making it unsuitable for disputes involving
significant factual disagreements.

www.prolegalminds.com 104 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4. Power Imbalance
• If one party is more powerful or influential, the process may favor them, undermining fairness.
5. Limited Legal Precedent
• Mediation does not create binding legal precedents, which may be necessary in cases requiring
clarity on law or interpretation.
6. Lack of Neutrality
• If the mediator is biased or lacks expertise, it can hinder the resolution process.
7. Unsuitability for Complex Disputes
• Cases involving complex legal, technical, or financial issues may require judicial intervention or
arbitration.
Conclusion
Mediation is an effective, flexible, and time-efficient mechanism for resolving disputes amicably.
Its advantages, including confidentiality, cost-effectiveness, and preservation of relationships,
make it a preferred choice for many parties. However, its non-binding nature (unless formalized)
and limited scope for complex disputes can be challenging. The enactment of the Mediation Act,
2023 has provided a robust legal framework to promote and strengthen mediation as a reliable
ADR mechanism in India.

25.What are the advantages and disadvantages of the ADR system?

Advantages and Disadvantages of the ADR System

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to a set of mechanisms for resolving disputes outside
traditional court litigation. It includes methods such as Arbitration, Mediation, Conciliation,
Negotiation, and Judicial Settlement (Lok Adalats). ADR aims to provide a faster, cost-effective,
and flexible resolution to disputes while reducing the burden on the courts.
In India, ADR is governed by:
• The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
• Section 89 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908
• Mediation Act, 2023
• Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
ADR has become a preferred choice for resolving disputes in various areas like commercial
disputes, family matters, labor disputes, and consumer grievances.

Advantages of the ADR System

1. Speedy Resolution
• ADR mechanisms resolve disputes quickly compared to the lengthy processes in traditional
courts.
• Example: Arbitration under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, mandates
a timeline of 12 months for arbitral awards.
2. Cost-Effective
• ADR eliminates high litigation costs, court fees, and expenses related to lawyers and formal
procedures.
• Example: Mediation and Lok Adalats involve nominal costs.

www.prolegalminds.com 105 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3. Confidentiality
• ADR ensures privacy of proceedings, which is particularly beneficial in sensitive disputes like
family matters or trade secrets.
• Section 22 of the Mediation Act, 2023 mandates confidentiality.
4. Preservation of Relationships
• ADR focuses on communication and compromise, making it ideal for disputes where
relationships need to be maintained (e.g., family, business, or employment conflicts).
5. Flexible Procedures
• ADR is not bound by strict procedural laws like the CPC or Evidence Act, giving parties the
freedom to structure the process.
6. Party Autonomy
• Parties have control over the process, including choosing the arbitrator, mediator, or conciliator,
and agreeing to mutually acceptable solutions.
7. Binding and Enforceable Outcomes
• Arbitral awards under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act are enforceable like
court decrees.
• Mediated settlements are legally binding under the Mediation Act, 2023.
8. Reduced Burden on Courts
• ADR helps reduce the backlog of cases in courts by diverting disputes to alternative
mechanisms.
9. International Dispute Resolution
• ADR, especially arbitration, is widely accepted for resolving cross-border disputes under
frameworks like the New York Convention, 1958.
10. Customizable Solutions
• ADR allows parties to explore creative, interest-based solutions that may not be possible in rigid
court judgments.

Disadvantages of the ADR System

1. Non-Binding Nature in Certain ADR Methods
• Mediation and conciliation rely on mutual agreements and may not result in binding outcomes
unless formalized in writing.
2. Limited Scope for Complex Cases
• ADR may not be suitable for disputes involving complex legal or technical issues requiring
judicial interpretation or legal precedents.
3. Power Imbalances
• A stronger party may dominate the proceedings, leading to unfair outcomes, especially in
informal ADR mechanisms like negotiation.
4. No Precedent Value
• ADR decisions do not create binding precedents, which are crucial for the development of law.
5. Lack of Enforcement in Informal ADR
• Informal agreements reached through negotiation or conciliation may face enforceability issues
if one party defaults.
6. Dependence on Party Cooperation
• ADR requires the willingness of both parties to cooperate and resolve the dispute. If one party
refuses, ADR fails.

www.prolegalminds.com 106 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

7. Bias or Lack of Neutrality

• The effectiveness of ADR depends on the neutrality and fairness of the arbitrator, mediator, or
conciliator. Any bias may render the process ineffective.
8. Inadequate Awareness
• Many people, particularly in rural areas, are unaware of ADR mechanisms or lack access to ADR
facilities.
9. No Formal Evidence Rules
• ADR processes do not follow strict evidence rules, which may lead to unfair decisions in disputes
requiring proper documentation or factual clarity.
10. Unsuitability for Criminal and Public Law Matters
• ADR cannot resolve criminal cases or matters of public policy, which require judicial adjudication.

Conclusion
The ADR system provides significant advantages, including speed, cost-effectiveness, flexibility,
and confidentiality, making it a valuable alternative to court litigation. However, limitations such
as non-binding outcomes, power imbalances, and lack of precedents can pose challenges. By
strengthening the legal framework through laws like the Mediation Act, 2023, raising awareness,
and improving access to ADR mechanisms, India can further enhance the effectiveness of ADR in
delivering efficient and fair justice.

26.What is the jurisdiction of the Family Courts? Are the Advocates allowed to
represent litigants at these Courts?

Jurisdiction of Family Courts and Representation by Advocates

Introduction
Family Courts are specialized courts established under the Family Courts Act, 1984 to deal with
disputes relating to family and matrimonial matters. These courts aim to resolve disputes in a
timely, informal, and amicable manner while promoting reconciliation between parties.
The jurisdiction of Family Courts is governed by Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, which
outlines the specific matters they can adjudicate.
Jurisdiction of Family Courts
Section 7(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, states that Family Courts have jurisdiction to deal
with:
1. Matrimonial Disputes:
• Divorce: Cases related to dissolution of marriage or judicial separation.
• Restitution of Conjugal Rights: Applications to restore marital relationships.
• Nullity of Marriage: Cases challenging the validity of a marriage.
2. Child Custody and Guardianship:
• Matters related to custody, guardianship, and access to minors under laws like the Guardian and
Wards Act, 1890.
3. Maintenance:
• Claims for maintenance under:
• Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
• Personal laws (Hindu, Muslim, Christian laws, etc.).

www.prolegalminds.com 107 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4. Property Disputes:
• Disputes related to property of spouses or family members arising out of marital relationships.
5. Declaration of Marital Status:
• Determination of the status of a person in matters of marriage, divorce, or legitimacy of children.
6. Adoption:
• Disputes related to adoption under personal laws.
7. Legitimacy of Children:
• Determination of the legitimacy of children born out of marriage.
8. Other Family-Related Matters:
• Matters assigned to Family Courts under other laws.

Exclusive Jurisdiction
• Family Courts exercise exclusive jurisdiction over family disputes.
• No other civil court can hear matters that fall under the jurisdiction of Family Courts once they
are established.
Are Advocates Allowed to Represent Litigants at Family Courts?
The representation of litigants by advocates in Family Courts is addressed in Section 13 of the
Family Courts Act, 1984, which states:
“No party to a suit or proceeding before a Family Court shall be entitled, as of right, to be
represented by a legal practitioner.”
Explanation of Section 13
1. No Absolute Right:
• Unlike regular courts, litigants in Family Courts do not have an automatic right to be represented
by advocates.
2. Court’s Discretion:
• The Family Court has the discretion to permit representation by legal practitioners if it feels that
professional legal assistance is necessary to ensure justice.
3. Promoting Informality:
• The intention behind restricting advocate representation is to simplify the process and
encourage direct communication between parties to promote reconciliation.
4. Exceptions:
• In complex cases or cases requiring legal expertise, the Family Court can allow advocates to
appear.
• Advocates can also assist in drafting petitions and other documents.

Case Law on Advocate Representation

1. Leela v. Mahadeo (1991)
• The Court observed that Section 13 of the Family Courts Act restricts the automatic right to
advocate representation but does not entirely prohibit it.
2. R. Balasubramanian v. Saroja (2005)
• The Court held that representation by advocates can be permitted if the Family Court deems it
essential for a fair trial.
3. Shahnaz Begum v. Rizwan Ahmad (2008)
• Advocates were allowed to appear when the parties were unable to properly present their case
due to lack of legal knowledge.

www.prolegalminds.com 108 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. V SEMESTER PAPER I PART-B ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Advantages of Restricting Advocate Representation

1. Simplification:
• The absence of legal practitioners reduces technicalities and promotes informal proceedings.
2. Reconciliation:
• Direct communication between parties improves the chances of amicable settlement.
3. Cost-Effective:
• Reduces litigation costs for families in dispute.

Disadvantages of Restricting Advocate Representation

1. Lack of Legal Expertise:
• Parties may struggle to represent themselves effectively in complex legal matters.
2. Inequality:
• A literate or more informed party may have an advantage over an illiterate or uninformed party.
3. Court’s Discretion:
• The decision to allow advocates is discretionary, which may lead to inconsistency.

Conclusion
The Family Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over disputes relating to marriage, maintenance,
custody, property, and adoption under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. While advocates
are not permitted as a matter of right under Section 13, the court may allow legal representation
when necessary to ensure justice. This approach seeks to balance informality, efficiency, and
fairness in resolving sensitive family disputes.

www.prolegalminds.com 109 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 LL.B. IV SEMESTER PAPER I LABOUR LAW-II

DISCLAIMER & WARNING:

DISCLAIMER:

The content provided herein has been meticulously crafted in collaboration with legal experts and AI
technology. While diligent efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and reliability, it is imperative to
acknowledge the inherent possibility of errors and omissions. Therefore, we cannot guarantee the
absolute correctness of every piece of information presented. Users are strongly advised to exercise
their own judgment and undertake due diligence to verify the facts before relying on any content
provided. The information contained herein is intended for general informational purposes only and
should not be construed as legal advice or substitute for professional legal consultation. Any action
taken based on the content herein is at the sole discretion and risk of the reader.

Furthermore, we expressly disclaim any liability for any loss, damage, or inconvenience arising from the
use or reliance on the information provided in this content. This disclaimer extends to any inaccuracies,
incompleteness, or misinterpretation of the content, as well as any consequences resulting from such
inaccuracies.

WARNING:

Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or copying of this content, whether in part or in its entirety, is
strictly prohibited and may result in legal consequences. All rights to the content, including but not
limited to text, graphics, images, and other materials, are reserved. Any unauthorized use or reproduction
of the content without explicit permission is a violation of copyright law and may subject the infringing
party to legal action, including but not limited to civil and criminal penalties.

By accessing, reading, or using this content, you agree to abide by the terms of this disclaimer and
warning. If you do not agree with these terms or find any aspect of this content unacceptable, you are
advised to refrain from accessing or using the content.

[Note: This comprehensive disclaimer and warning are provided for informational purposes only and
should be reviewed and customized as necessary to align with specific legal requirements and
jurisdictional considerations.]

Complied By

ProLegal Minds & Co

LAW FIRM FOR NATURAL JUSTICE
www.prolegalminds.com
 @prolegalminds

2024 OSMANIA UNIVERSITY

LL.B 3YDC - V SEMESTER

This comprehensive guide to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a meticulously crafted resource
for law students, academicians, and legal practitioners. Covering key ADR mechanisms such as
Negotiation, Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration, and modern developments like Online Dispute
Resolution (ODR), the book blends theoretical concepts with practical insights.

It delves into the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Mediation Act, 2023, and other relevant

www.prolegalminds.com
statutes, case laws, and international conventions, including the UNCITRAL Model Laws and
Singapore Convention on Mediation (2019).

Key Features
• Detailed Coverage: Comprehensive explanation of ADR mechanisms with sections, relevant laws,
and case references.
• Student-Centric Approach: Designed to meet the academic requirements of law students pursuing
LL.B and LL.M courses.
• Practical Insights: Real-life examples, problem-solving exercises, and model settlement agreements.
• Updated Content: Incorporates the latest amendments, including the Mediation Act, 2023 and
technological developments like ODR.
• Exam-Focused: Includes short and long-form Q&A for exam preparation, along with case studies and
practical exercises.

“Resolving disputes efficiently, amicably, and effectively – The power of ADR.”

Published by: ProlegalMinds & CO |. ISBN:9190001020104 | Price:

₹1

ProLegal Minds & Co

LAW FIRM FOR NATURAL JUSTICE