ARTICLE 21
ARTICLE 21
ARTICLE 21
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the Right to Life and Personal Liberty, which has
been expansively interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the right to a healthy and pollution-free
environment. This connection between environmental protection and fundamental rights has formed
the foundation of environmental jurisprudence in India.
• Article 21: Guarantees the fundamental right to life, which includes the right to live in a healthy
environment, free from pollution and environmental degradation.
• Judicial Interpretation: The Supreme Court has expanded Article 21 to include the right to a
pollution-free environment, clean water, and air, as essential for a dignified life.
Key Cases:
1. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987): Recognized the right to live in a pollution-free
environment as part of Article 21.
2. Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of UP (Dehradun Quarrying Case, 1985):
First case to include the right to a healthy environment under Article 21.
3. Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar (1991): Emphasized the right to clean air and water as part of
the right to life.
Right to Livelihood
• Expansion of Article 21: The scope of Article 21 includes the right to livelihood, protecting
individuals from actions that threaten their livelihood, especially in cases where environmental
harm causes displacement or loss of income.
Example: Protests against large dams that displace tribal people and deprive them of their livelihood.
Environmental harm that affects livelihoods, such as displacement due to environmental degradation or
pollution, is seen as a violation of this fundamental right.
• The Supreme Court’s interpretation has broadened Article 21 to include other rights essential for
a dignified life, including the right to a clean and safe environment.
A citizen cannot carry on business activities that pose health hazards to society. The environmental
protection safeguards inherent in this principle were recognized in the case of Cooverjee B. Bharucha
v. Excise Commissioner, Ajmer (1954), which balanced the right to trade with environmental concerns.
Judicial Activism:
• Through judicial activism, the courts have continuously expanded the scope of Article 21 to
include environmental protection. Green benches were set up to address environmental issues
more effectively, and courts have actively intervened in cases of environmental damage.
Judicial Interpretation and Environmental Litigation
Key Cases:
• This case marked the first recognition of the right to a healthy environment under Article 21.
The Supreme Court ordered the cessation of illegal mining activities, highlighting the connection
between environmental protection and human rights.
• The Court emphasized that environmental protection is not only a matter of law but also a
human right. This judgment made it clear that the right to a healthy environment is an integral
part of the right to life.
• The Court reinforced the right to pollution-free water and air as part of the fundamental right
to life, and it mandated state action to address pollution issues affecting citizens’ health.
• In various cases, the Court has emphasized that public health and ecology are critical components
of the right to life. For example, the case of Ratlam Municipality v. Vardicharan emphasized
that pollution control and a safe environment are integral to the well-being of citizens.
Public Interest Litigation and Environmental Protection in India
• PIL under Articles 32 and 226 has been key for addressing environmental issues in
India.
o Article 32 allows citizens to approach the Supreme Court for the protection of
fundamental rights.
o Article 226 allows citizens to approach High Courts for environmental matters.
Role of Panchayats:
• Panchayats are empowered to take actions like soil conservation, water management,
and forestry for environmental protection.
Cultural Values:
Constitutional Framework:
Conclusion: