School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering

ECW 557 ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

Semester October 2022-February 2023

SUBMISSION FORM

Submission Date 27/1/2023

Group CEEC2205C2
Lecturer • Profesor Madya Ir Dr Nur Asmaliza Binti Mohd Noor
• Ir.Dr. Suzana Binti Ramli
1) Muhammad Muaz Abqari Bin Mohd Khairi
(2021853038)
2) Muhammad Afiq Bin Rosairie
Group Members & (2021492428)
Student Id No. 3) Muhammad Alif Zakwan Bin Mohd Fariz
(2021615066)
4) Muhammad Anwar Bin Rosman
(2021868114)
5) Nur Zahidah Binti Rosli
(2021468672)
Table Of Content

No Contents Pages
1.0 Introduction 2-3
2.0 Objective 3
3.0 Urban Drainage System Design
3.1- Design Procedure 4-9
3.2- Proposed Development Design To 10
Design Urban Drainage System
3.3- Design Assumptions 11
3.4- Design Calculation Sheet 12
4.0 Discussion 13-14
5.0 Conclusion 15
6.0 Reference 16
7.0 Appendix 17

1
1.0- Introduction

This project's drainage design and standards adhere to the 2012 edition of the Urban Storm Water
Management Manual for Malaysia, Second Edition (MSMA). In addition, the dimensions and
planned water flow of the drainage were well-designed in the Part of Conceptual Design. Drains
should be able to transport water up to and including the minor system design ARI. Drainage is
the process of draining surface and subsurface water from a region. Drainage systems consist of
all pipes on a private or public property that transport sewage, rainwater, and other liquid waste to
a disposal point. The primary duties of a drainage system are to collect and eliminate waste matter
in a systematic manner in order to keep a building healthy. The objective of drainage systems is to
dispose of wastewater as fast as possible and to avoid sewage and septic tank gases from entering
residential areas. As in this case study of a project, the area is predominantly residential. There are
various types of home drainage systems, including;

1. Surface Drainage systems.

Surface drainage systems consist of parallel shallow ditches that function as canals for runoff
water. These ditches direct water to the main drain to prevent flooding and pooling.

2. Subsurface Drainage Methods

A subterranean drainage system is also referred to as a French drain. Subsurface drains are installed
beneath the soil's surface to remove surplus water from the root zone. Subsurface drains necessitate
the construction of deep ditches and underground pipelines. Install a huge collection drain to
collect water from the pipes.

3. Drainage Systems for Slopes

With the aid of pipes running down a slope, slope drains allow water to flow from a structure
below. The installation and anchoring of a pipe into a slight slope causes water to flow into the
pipe and away from the structure.

The drainage systems of residential areas remove excess water. This system helps direct water
away from roofs, sidewalks, and roads to prevent floods. Residential drainage systems are crucial
for preventing rot, mould, mildew, and structural damage in buildings caused by water
accumulation. The most prevalent sort of drainage system is the French drain, which provides a

2
simple route for water to flow. The water flows into a gravel-filled trench, then through a
perforated pipe at the pipe's base, and ultimately discharges at a safe distance from the home. Due
to the land's geography, geological age, and other factors, the construction of this sewage system
will provide numerous obstacles for engineers.

2.0- Objective

1. Propose the drainage layout area for a particular area based on the projected development
plan.
2. To develop residential area projects according to the current Malaysian standard.
3. To create a solution utilising standards or rules of practise and design verification.
4. Determine and calculate the peak flow rate for each drain.

3
3.0- Urban Drainage System Design

3.1- Design Procedure

The priority focus of Urban Stormwater Management Manual for Malaysia (MSMA) is to
eliminate and reduce the possibilities of hazardous such as flash flood, pollutions of river by
managing the stormwater flow. The major objective of MSMA were to ensure the safety of the
public from the environmental hazards. Not only that, MSMA target to control nuisance flooding
and provide for the safe passage of less frequent and larger flood events. Hence, to controlling the
stormwater flow, a designing a drain with consideration of the precipitation volume until final
smooth flow should be done by using the rational method formula. Rational formula is one of the
most frequently used urban hydrology method in Malaysia to compute the stormwater flows from
the rainfall. Here’s the design procedure that be used in designing the drains according to the urban
Stromwater Management Manual Malaysia (MSMA) 2nd Edition;

4
 From Table 2.B1:
CALCULATION OF DRAINAGE 1
Fitting Constants for
1.0 Location the IDF Empirical
Equation for the
● Drain section: D1
Different Locations in
● Length = 45.20m
Malaysia for High
● Return Period = 50 years
ARIs between 2 and
● Area = 0.009 ha
100 Year and Storm
● State = Kg Peta Hulu Sg Endau
Durations from 5
with constants of
Minutes to 72 Hours,
i) λ = 59.500 MSMA 2nd Edition
2012
ii) κ = 0.185

iii) θ = 0.129

iv) η = 0.623

From Table 2.1:

2.0 Flow Time
Equations to Estimate
● Overland flow, to Time of Concentration

1 1 (QUDM, 2007)
107𝑛∗𝐿 3 107𝑥0.623𝑥𝐿 3
= 1 = 1 Assume, to = 5mins
𝑆5 𝑆5
L = for Steep
107𝑥0.015𝑥(45.2)1/3
= 1 = 4.88 mins < 5 mins Slope (>10%), L ≤
(2.212)5 50m

● Slope of overland surface (%), S n* = 0.015 From Table

(𝑅𝐿𝑢𝑝𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚 − 𝑅𝐿𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚) 2.2: Values of

x 100%
𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ Horton’s Roughness
(Paved)
(88.00−87.00)
= 45.20
x 100% = 2.212 %

5
● Drain time, tf Assume, velocity = 2.0
m/s
𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 45.20 𝑚 1 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦
= 2.0 𝑚/𝑠
x 60𝑠

= 0.377 min

● Time of concentration, tc

= Overland Flow Time + Drain Time

= 5.0 + 0.377

= 5.377 min

● Critical time of concentration

= Time of concentration

= 5.0 + 0.377

= 5.377 min

6
3.0 Design Flow, Qdesign Rational Method
● Runoff coefficient, C = 0.7 (Bungalow)
● Intensity, i Equation 2.3, Rational
𝜆𝑇 𝜅 Method, MSMA
=
(𝑑+𝜃)𝜂

59.500∗500.185
= From equation
((5.377/60)+0.129)0.623
2.2.3.2, Empirical IDF
= 316.381 mm/h
Curves, MSMA 2nd
Edition 2012

● Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.7 (Bungalow)

● Equivalent Runoff Coefficient = 0.7
From Table 2.5:
Recommended Runoff
Coefficient for
Various Landuses
(DID, 1980; Chow et
al., 1988; QUDM,
2007 and Darwin
Harbour,2009)
(Residential
● Total Equivalent Area = 0.009 ha
Bungalow House: For
Major System
● Discharge, Qdesign
(> 10 year ARI))
= C*I*A / 360
= (0.7 x 316.381 x 0.009) / 360
= 0.0055 m3/s

4.0 Drain Design, Qcapacity (Manning’s Equation)

7
● Drain section: 0.90x0.45m Drain section, From
● Flow area, A Hume Box Culvert,
2
0.90x0.45 = 0.405m Table 1 - Standard
● Wetted perimeter, P Size

0.90 + (0.45x2) = 1.80m

● Hydraulic radius, R
A/P = 0.405/1.80
= 0.225m
● n = 0.018
● S = 1/200

n = 0.018, From Table

2.2: Values of
Horton’s Roughness n
● Q = (1/0.018) (0.405) (0.225)2/3 (1/200)1/2
(QUDM, 2007)
= 0.589 m3/s

● Actual velocity, V
Q = VA
V = 0.589/0.405
= 1.454 m/s

● Flow time, T
T = L/V
= 45.2/1.454
= 31.09 sec = 0.518 min

● Invert Level 1 = (RLdownstream - Depth)

= 87.00 - 0.45m

8
 = 86.55m
● Invert Level 2 = IL1 - (Length x 1/200)
= 86.55 - (45.2 x 1/200)
= 86.32m

9
 3.2-
Proposed Development Design To
Design Urban Drainage System

10
 A1

NAME OF THE PROJECT :

DRAINAGE DESIGN FOR BLOK B

KUARTES F BUNGALOW
A7

A8
A6

A1
A9
A10
A11
DESIGN BY :
A5
A12

A14
A4
A2
A15 A13
A3 A20
A1

A17
A1

A25 A21
A19
A16
MUHAMMAD ANWAR BIN ROSMAN
A22 A18

A24 A23

DRAWING TITLE:

1. DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN

WITH BUILDING
2. DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN
3. DRAINAGE CATCHMENT
AREA LAYOUT PLAN

1. DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN WITH BUILDING DATE OF SUBMISSION :

25 JANURAY 2023
 NAME OF THE PROJECT :

B DRAINAGE DESIGN FOR BLOK B

KUARTES F BUNGALOW

DESIGN BY :

MUHAMMAD ANWAR BIN ROSMAN

DRAWING TITLE:
2. DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN 1. DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN
WITH BUILDING
2. DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN
3. DRAINAGE CATCHMENT
AREA LAYOUT PLAN

DATE OF SUBMISSION :

25 JANURAY 2023
 D2

NAME OF THE PROJECT :

D1
D3

D4
DRAINAGE DESIGN FOR BLOK B
KUARTES F BUNGALOW

D5

D8
DESIGN BY :
D6
D7

MUHAMMAD ANWAR BIN ROSMAN

DRAWING TITLE:
3. DRAINAGE CATHCMENT AREA LAYOUT PLAN
1. DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN
WITH BUILDING
2. DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN
3. DRAINAGE CATCHMENT
AREA LAYOUT PLAN

DATE OF SUBMISSION :

25 JANURAY 2023
3.3- Design Assumptions

11
 Design Sheet
D1
Drain: ___________________ 45.2m
Length = __________________ Designed by: _________________

Return Period: _________

50 year 59.500
= ________ 0.185
= ________ = ________
0.129 = ________
0.623

Type of sub-area Area (ha) C CA

D1_L 0.009 0.7 0.0063

Inlet time t0 = _______________

4.88 min (Remark: ___________________________________________)
4.88 min < 5 min use 5 min
Drain time tf = ______________
0.377 min (Assumed velocity V = _________m/s)
2
Time of concentration tc = ___________
5.377 min Critical time of concentration t c = __________
5.377 min
Intensity I = _____________________
316.381 mm/h Equivalent runoff coefficient C e = _____________
0.7

Peak discharge Qp = _______________

0.0055 m3/s

0.90x0.45m
Drain section: ____________________________ Section details:
0.405 m2 P = ______
A = ______ 0.225 m
1.80 m R = _______

0.018
n = __________ 1/200
Proposed gradient: __________
Drain Section: 0.90x0.45m
0.589
Capacity Q = ______________________ m3/s
A: 0.405m2
1.454
Actual velocity = ___________________ m/s
R: 0.225m
0.518
Actual drain time = _________________ min
Depth: 0.45m
RL = 87.00m
RL = 88.00m

IL = 86.55m
Upstream Downstream
IL = 86.32m
 Design Sheet
D2
Drain: ___________________ 6.1m
Length = __________________ Designed by: _________________

Return Period: _________

50 year 59.500
= ________ 0.185
= ________ = ________
0.129 = ________
0.623

Type of sub-area Area (ha) C CA

A1a 0.0008 0.00056

A6 0.0006 0.00042
A7 0.0021 0.00147
A8 0.0006 0.7 0.00042
A9 0.0004 0.00028
A10 0.0004 0.00028

Inlet time t0 = _______________

1.93 min (Remark: ___________________________________________)
1.93 min < 5 min use 5 min
Drain time tf = ______________
0.051 min (Assumed velocity V = _________m/s)
2
Time of concentration tc = ___________
5.051 min Critical time of concentration t c = __________
5.051 min
Intensity I = _____________________
321.378 mm/h Equivalent runoff coefficient C e = _____________
0.7

Peak discharge Qp = _______________

0.0031 m3/s

0.90x0.50m
Drain section: ____________________________ Section details:
0.450 m2 P = ______
A = ______ 1.90 m R = _______
0.237 m

0.018
n = __________ Proposed gradient: __________
1/200
Drain Section: 0.90x0.50m
0.677
Capacity Q = ______________________ m3/s
A: 0.450m2
1.504
Actual velocity = ___________________ m/s
0.068
Actual drain time = _________________ min R: 0.237m

Depth: 0.50m
RL = 86.50
RL = 87.00

IL = 86.00 Upstream Downstream

IL = 85.97
 Design Sheet
D3
Drain: ___________________ 3m
Length = __________________ Designed by: _________________

Return Period: _________

50 year 59.500
= ________ 0.185
= ________ = ________
0.129 = ________
0.623

Type of sub-area Area (ha) C CA

D3_L 0.0006 0.7 0.00042

Inlet time t0 = _______________

1.32 min (Remark: ___________________________________________)
1.32 min < 5 min use 5 min
Drain time tf = ______________
0.025 min (Assumed velocity V = _________m/s)
2
Time of concentration tc = ___________
5.025 min Critical time of concentration t c = __________
5.025 min
Intensity I = _____________________
321.783 mm/h Equivalent runoff coefficient C e = _____________
0.7

Peak discharge Qp = _______________

0.0004 m3/s

0.90x0.55m
Drain section: ____________________________ Section details:
0.495 m2 P = ______
A = ______ 2.00 m R = _______
0.248 m

0.018
n = __________ Proposed gradient: __________
1/200 Drain Section: 0.90x0.55m
0.768
Capacity Q = ______________________ m3/s A: 0.495m2
1.552
Actual velocity = ___________________ m/s
R: 0.248m
0.032
Actual drain time = _________________ min
Depth: 0.55m
RL = 86.00
RL = 86.50

IL = 85.45
Upstream Downstream
IL = 85.44
 Design Sheet
D4
Drain: ___________________ 6.6 m
Length = __________________ Designed by: _________________

Return Period: _________

50 year 59.500
= ________ 0.185
= ________ = ________
0.129 = ________
0.623

Type of sub-area Area (ha) C CA

D4_L 0.0013 0.7 0.00091

Inlet time t0 = _______________

1.72 min (Remark: ___________________________________________)
1.72 min < 5 min use 5 min
Drain time tf = ______________
0.055 min (Assumed velocity V = _________m/s)
2
Time of concentration tc = ___________
5.055 min Critical time of concentration t c = __________
5.055 min
Intensity I = _____________________
321.313 mm/h Equivalent runoff coefficient C e = _____________
0.7

Peak discharge Qp = _______________

0.0008 m3/s

0.90x0.60m
Drain section: ____________________________ Section details:
A = ______ 2.10 m R = _______
0.540 m2 P = ______ 0.257 m
0.018
n = __________ 1/200
Proposed gradient: __________
0.858
Capacity Q = ______________________ m3/s Drain Section: 0.90x0.60m

1.589
Actual velocity = ___________________ m/s A: 0.540m2
0.069
Actual drain time = _________________ min R: 0.257m

RL = 85.60 Depth: 0.60m

RL = 86.00

IL = 85.00
Upstream Downstream
IL = 84.97
 Design Sheet
D5
Drain: ___________________ 11.7 m
Length = __________________ Designed by: _________________

Return Period: _________

50 year 59.500
= ________ 0.185
= ________ = ________
0.129 = ________
0.623

Type of sub-area Area (ha) C CA

A11 0.0006 0.00042

A12 0.0019 0.00133
A13 0.0005 0.00035
A14 0.0003 0.7 0.00021
A15 0.0006 0.00042
A16 0.0005 0.00035
A17 0.0013 0.00091

Inlet time t0 = _______________

2.53 min (Remark: ___________________________________________)
2.53 min < 5 min use 5 min
Drain time tf = ______________
0.098 min (Assumed velocity V = _________m/s)
2
Time of concentration tc = ___________
5.098 min Critical time of concentration t c = __________
5.098 min
Intensity I = _____________________
320.650 mm/h Equivalent runoff coefficient C e = _____________
0.7

Peak discharge Qp = _______________

0.0036 m3/s

0.90x0.65m
Drain section: ____________________________ Section details:
0.585 m2 P = ______
A = ______ 2.20 m R = _______
0.266 m

0.018
n = __________ 1/200
Proposed gradient: __________
0.951 Drain Section: 0.90x0.65m
Capacity Q = ______________________ m3/s
1.626
Actual velocity = ___________________ m/s A: 0.585m2

Actual drain time = _________________

0.12 min R: 0.266m

Depth: 0.65m
RL = 84.87
RL = 85.60

IL = 84.22
Upstream Downstream
IL = 84.16
 Design Sheet
D6
Drain: ___________________ 1.8 m
Length = __________________ Designed by: _________________

Return Period: _________

50 year 59.500
= ________ 0.185
= ________ = ________
0.129 = ________
0.623

Type of sub-area Area (ha) C CA

A18 0.0006 0.7 0.00042

Inlet time t0 = _______________

1.89 min (Remark: ___________________________________________)
1.89 min < 5 min use 5 min
Drain time tf = ______________
0.015 min (Assumed velocity V = _________m/s)
2
Time of concentration tc = ___________
5.015 min Critical time of concentration t c = __________
5.015 min
Intensity I = _____________________
321.941 mm/h Equivalent runoff coefficient C e = _____________
0.7

Peak discharge Qp = _______________

0.0004 m3/s

0.90x0.70m
Drain section: ____________________________ Section details:
2.30 m R = _______
0.630 m2 P = ______
A = ______ 0.274 m

0.018
n = __________ 1/200
Proposed gradient: __________
1.044 Drain Section: 0.90x0.70m
Capacity Q = ______________________ m3/s
1.657 A: 0.630m2
Actual velocity = ___________________ m/s
0.018
Actual drain time = _________________ min R: 0.274m

Depth: 0.70m
RL = 84.00
RL = 84.87

IL = 83.3
Upstream Downstream
IL = 83.29
 Design Sheet
D7
Drain: ___________________ 5m
Length = __________________ Designed by: _________________

Return Period: _________

50 year 59.500
= ________ 0.185
= ________ = ________
0.129 = ________
0.623

Type of sub-area Area (ha) C CA

D7_L 0.001 0.7 0.0007

Inlet time t0 = _______________

1.86 min (Remark: ___________________________________________)
1.86 min < 5 min use 5 min
Drain time tf = ______________
0.042 min (Assumed velocity V = _________m/s)
2
Time of concentration tc = ___________
5.042 min Critical time of concentration t c = __________
5.042 min
Intensity I = _____________________
321.522 mm/h Equivalent runoff coefficient C e = _____________
0.7

Peak discharge Qp = _______________

0.0006 m3/s

0.90x0.80m
Drain section: ____________________________ Section details:
0.720 m2 P = ______
A = ______ 2.50 m R = _______
0.288 m

0.018
n = __________ 1/200
Proposed gradient: __________ Drain Section: 0.90x0.80m
1.233
Capacity Q = ______________________ m3/s A: 0.720m2
1.713
Actual velocity = ___________________ m/s
R: 0.288m
0.049
Actual drain time = _________________ min
Depth: 0.80m
RL = 83.65
RL = 84.00

IL = 82.85
Upstream Downstream
IL = 82.83
 Design Sheet
D8
Drain: ___________________ 10.9 m
Length = __________________ Designed by: _________________

Return Period: _________

50 year 59.500
= ________ 0.185
= ________ = ________
0.129 = ________
0.623

Type of sub-area Area (ha) C CA

A1 0.0013 0.00091
A2 0.0002 0.00014
A3 0.0005 0.00035
A4 0.0016 0.00112
A5 0.0037 0.7 0.00259
A18 0.0003 0.00021
A19 0.0006 0.00042
A20 0.0002 0.00014
A21 0.0006 0.00042
A22 0.0008 0.00056
A23 0.0004 0.00028
A24 0.0007 0.00049
A25 0.0006 0.00042

Inlet time t0 = _______________

2.5 min (Remark: ___________________________________________)
2.5 min < 5 min use 5 min
Drain time tf = ______________
0.091 min (Assumed velocity V = _________m/s)
2
Time of concentration tc = ___________
5.091 min Critical time of concentration t c = __________
5.091 min
Intensity I = _____________________
320.754 mm/h Equivalent runoff coefficient C e = _____________
0.7

Peak discharge Qp = _______________

0.0072 m3/s

0.90x0.90m
Drain section: ____________________________ Section details:
0.810 m2 P = ______
A = ______ 2.70 m R = _______
0.300 m

0.018
n = __________ 1/200
Proposed gradient: __________
1.426
Capacity Q = ______________________ m3/s Drain Section: 0.90x0.80m
1.760
Actual velocity = ___________________ m/s A: 0.810m2
0.103
Actual drain time = _________________ min R: 0.300m

RL = 83.00 Depth: 0.90m

RL = 83.65

IL = 82.10
Upstream Downstream
IL = 82.05
 3.4-
Design Calculation Sheet

12
 Location Catchment Flow time Rational Method Drain Design
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
Drain section Length Return period Sub-area Area Overland flow Drain time Time of concentration Critical Time of Concentration Intensity Runoff Coefficient Equivalent Runoff Coefficient Total Equivalent area Discharge Drain Section Gradient Capacity Actual velocity Flowtime Invert level
m yr ha min min min min mm/h ha m3/s 1 in m3/s m/s min m
D1 45.2 50 D1_L 0.009 5 0.377 5.377 5.377 316.381 0.7 0.7 0.009 0.005537 0.90x0.45m 200 0.589 1.454 0.518 86.55
6.1 50 A1a 0.0008 5 0.051 5.051 5.051 321.378 0.7 0.7 0.0008 0.0005 0.90x0.50m 200 0.677 1.504 0.068 86
6.1 50 A6 0.0006 5 0.051 5.051 5.051 321.378 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000375 0.90x0.50m 200 0.677 1.504 0.068 86
6.1 50 A7 0.0021 5 0.051 5.051 5.051 321.378 0.7 0.7 0.0021 0.001312 0.90x0.50m 200 0.677 1.504 0.068 86
D2
6.1 50 A8 0.0006 5 0.051 5.051 5.051 321.378 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000375 0.90x0.50m 200 0.677 1.504 0.068 86
6.1 50 A9 0.0004 5 0.051 5.051 5.051 321.378 0.7 0.7 0.0004 0.00025 0.90x0.50m 200 0.677 1.504 0.068 86
6.1 50 A10 0.0004 5 0.051 5.051 5.051 321.378 0.7 0.7 0.0004 0.00025 0.90x0.50m 200 0.677 1.504 0.068 86
D3 3 50 D3_L 0.0006 5 0.025 5.025 5.025 321.783 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000375 0.90x0.55m 200 0.768 1.552 0.032 85.45
D4 6.6 50 D4_L 0.0013 5 0.055 5.055 5.055 321.313 0.7 0.7 0.0013 0.000812 0.90x0.60m 200 0.858 1.589 0.069 85
11.7 50 A11 0.0006 5 0.098 5.098 5.098 320.650 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000374 0.90x0.65m 200 0.951 1.626 0.12 84.22
11.7 50 A12 0.0019 5 0.098 5.098 5.098 320.650 0.7 0.7 0.0019 0.001185 0.90x0.65m 200 0.951 1.626 0.12 84.22
11.7 50 A13 0.0005 5 0.098 5.098 5.098 320.650 0.7 0.7 0.0005 0.000312 0.90x0.65m 200 0.951 1.626 0.12 84.22
D5 11.7 50 A14 0.0003 5 0.098 5.098 5.098 320.650 0.7 0.7 0.0003 0.000187 0.90x0.65m 200 0.951 1.626 0.12 84.22
11.7 50 A15 0.0006 5 0.098 5.098 5.098 320.650 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000374 0.90x0.65m 200 0.951 1.626 0.12 84.22
11.7 50 A16 0.0005 5 0.098 5.098 5.098 320.650 0.7 0.7 0.0005 0.000312 0.90x0.65m 200 0.951 1.626 0.12 84.22
11.7 50 A17 0.0013 5 0.098 5.098 5.098 320.650 0.7 0.7 0.0013 0.000811 0.90x0.65m 200 0.951 1.626 0.12 84.22
D6 1.8 50 A18 0.0006 5 0.015 5.015 5.015 321.941 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000376 0.90x0.70m 200 1.044 1.657 0.018 83.3
D7 5 50 D7_L 0.001 5 0.042 5.042 5.042 321.522 0.7 0.7 0.001 0.000625 0.90x0.80m 200 1.233 1.713 0.049 82.85
10.9 50 A1 0.0013 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0013 0.000811 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A2 0.0002 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0002 0.000125 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A3 0.0005 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0005 0.000312 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A4 0.0016 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0016 0.000998 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A5 0.0037 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0037 0.002308 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A18 0.0003 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0003 0.000187 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
D8 10.9 50 A19 0.0006 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000374 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A20 0.0002 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0002 0.000125 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A21 0.0006 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000374 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A22 0.0008 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0008 0.000499 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A23 0.0004 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0004 0.000249 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A24 0.0007 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0007 0.000437 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
10.9 50 A25 0.0006 5 0.091 5.091 5.091 320.754 0.7 0.7 0.0006 0.000374 0.90x0.90m 200 1.426 1.76 0.103 82.1
Rlupstream Rldownstream
s=((Rlupstream-Rldownstream)/length) x100%
88.00 87.00 2.212
87.00 86.50 8.197
86.50 86.00 16.667
86.00 85.60 6.061
85.60 84.87 6.239
84.87 84.00 48.333
84.00 83.65 7.000
83.65 83.00 5.963
4.0- Discussion

Through the use of the Rational Method, one may express a correlation between the peak
flood flow and the amount of rainfall and the catchment area. The Rational Method has been
around for nearly a century, but its use dates back more than 150 years. When it comes to
constructing climate patterns, the Rational Method is among the most widely used approaches.
There have been many technology advances, and this is employed in every country. If
implemented correctly, and the results and design ideas are evaluated to make sure they make
sense, this strategy is still beneficial even for small catchment areas. When the entire catchment is
involved in the flood, peak flow occurs, the Rational Method states, and the rainfall intensity is
consistent across the catchment area and during the concentration period, tc.

It has been suggested that the plan contain a total of eight drains based on the drainage
idea in order to manage all of the runoff water that emanates from the bungalow class F quarters.
This would be in accordance with the drainage concept. In addition, there are two entrances that
ultimately lead into the primary discharge point.

Because the majority of the values were lower than 2.0 m/s, the flow rate of the water was
assumed to be 2.0 m/s, and the return period was assumed to be 50 years for each drain. The flow
velocity can be determined by using table 1.2, which is the Surface Flow criteria. The amount of
time that passes between occurrences of extreme weather, such as earthquakes and floods, is
referred to as the return period. It is also used to quantify the intensity of such events, most likely
the water level when a flood occurs, the longer the return period, the more intense it is. The
Kampung Peta Hulu Sg. Endau coefficients for λ, K, ɵ and n were acquired from MSMA, and they
were given the values 59.500, 0.185, 0.129, and 0.623 accordingly. The computation was
performed assuming that the slope was one in two hundred. According to the calculation, the
velocity must be more than 0.9 m/s in order to prevent water from stagnating. Because every figure
in the calculation of actual velocity presented above was larger than 0.9m/s, the specified drainage
was deemed to be in compliance with the standards.

When determining the peak flow for each drain, we employed the rational technique formula
Q=CIA/360. According to the structure of the design, the discharge capacity needs to be higher
than the peak discharge (Qcapacity > Qpeak). According to the drainage layout design, D8 is the
primary drain, and this form of drainage was in charge of transporting and collecting all of the

13
water before it was released into the outlet. In order to prevent any kind of problem from occurring,
this drain needs to have a drain size that is adequate enough to fit the capacity of the other drain.

14
5.0- Conclusion

In conclusion, the project that has been proposed to undertake urban drainage design in the
context of development project using the local hydrological procedure were successfully achieved.
The success of the project can be proof by achieving all four objectives of this project. First of all,
the objective of propose the drainage layout area for a particular area based on the projected
development area. This can be proof by the autocad drawing of the drainage design for Block B
Kuartes F Bungalow. From the autocad drawing, its shows the flows of water from the
precipitation to the proper outlet by assume it as an arrow. The flow of water were determine based
on reduce level of the project locations. The second objective that been achieved is by design the
drainage of residential area according to current Malaysian standard. This can be proof by the
extraction of 8 drain from the propose drainage layout. Those 8 drains were being design according
to the design procedure from the Urban Stormwater Management Manual Malaysia 2nd Edition as
shows in figure 1. Third objective that be achieved is to determine and calculate the peak flow rate
for these 8 drains. This can be proof by the data obtained from the calculation for all drain peak
flow discharge,Qp;

Drain Peak Flow Discharge, Qp

D1 0.0055 m3/s
D2 0.0031 m3/s
D3 0.0004 m3/s
D4 0.0008 m3/s
D5 0.0036 m3/s
D6 0.0004 m3/s
D7 0.0006 m3/s
D8 0.0072 m3/s

Lastly, the final objective that been achieved is to create a solution ultilising standards or rules of
practice and design verification. This can be proof by checking the design drain pass the design
verification which is (Qcapacity > Qpeak). To conclude, all 8 design drain passed the design
verification and align with rules of practice.

15
6.0- Reference

1) ECW557 Lecture Notes Chapter 10- Rational Method

2) Site Plan of the project.

3) Urban Stormwater Management Manual for Malaysia

4) Drainage

Retrieve from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drainage

5) Types of drainage system

Retrieve from: https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/livestock-and-animals/dairy/managing-wet-

soils/types-of-subsurface-drainage-
systems#:~:text=There%20are%204%20main%20types,interceptor%20drains

16
7.0- Appendix

Table 2: Johor has been choosen as the location to be study and analyze.

17