Exegesis Hebrews 12 2
Exegesis Hebrews 12 2
Exegesis Hebrews 12 2
Introduction to back ground The background to which the letter was written seems to be Jewish Christians who are under persecution and maybe in serious danger of apostasy. But in saying that there is enough evidence to suggest that many of the illustrations given could be understood by Jewish and Gentile readers alike.1 It seems the strongest argument for Jewish readership is the various uses of rabbinical practices in the interpretation of the book of Hebrews.2 Vos suggests that the readership could not have been Jewish because of the elementary things that must be taught again (Hebrews 6:1-2; 9:14). He argues that Jews would have already known those elementary truths.3 Vos sees the acts that lead to death or dead works that must be left behind attributed to gentiles. However as Trotter points out, the writer is as much concerned about the dead works of Judaism (Hebrews 8:5, 9:23 and 10:1)4. The elementary things are about Christ and they would still be elementary to Jews. And it is about Christ that our text is concerned with, the author and protector of our faith. There is no doubt that this letter is written to a particular group of people, as seen in 13:245, and while a Jewish audience cannot be proven, it is our understanding that it was the most likely option and a better way of interpreting Hebrews 12:1-3. Therefore we find this concept in Hebrews 12:2 where the writer draws on a traditional view of seated at the right hand of God (Psalm 110:1) and the historical survey of Hebrews 11 that Hebrews 12:1 uses as
1
Page | 1
Ellingworth, Paul. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Michigan : Eerdmanns, 1993. 24-25. Trotter, Andrew, H. Jr. Interpreting the Epistle to the Hebrews. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1997. 29. Vos, G. The teaching of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Eugene, Origen: Wepf and Stock, 1998. 18 (Trotter 1997, 30) (Ellingworth 1993, 26)
We are called to persevere in the faith using a series of examples taken from the history of Gods people. The reader is being exhorted to persevere in the will of God (10:36) and in our perseverance we are not without witness or example.6 The theme of perseverance is highlighted through 12:1-13, has a literary pattern (Vanhoye) that is similar to other homiletical complexes in Hebrews. The following chiastic structure is an example:7 A A Call to run with endurance (vv. 1-3) B A Explanation of the role of suffering (vv. 4-11)
Our pericope (vs.1-3) also introduces and summarises chapter 11:1-40 and is followed by a citation of scripture, which in turn is followed by an explanation of the image of that scripture.8 We quickly move from using the third person in chapter 11:1-40 to using the verb in the first or second person, moving from historical canvas of faith and perseverance of Hebrews 11 to personal application and pastoral exhortation in chapter 12.9 The emphasis of verse put on Jesus the perfecter of our faith is seen in Hornings chiastic structure of Hebrews 12:1-2:
6
Kistemaker, S.J. Hebrews. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic , 1984. 365 (Ellingworth 1993, 637) Attridge, H.W. The Epistle to the Hebrews Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989. 354
Lane, William L. Word Biblical Commentary: Hebrews 9-13. Dallas : Word, Incorporated, 2002 (Word Biblical Commentary 47B), S. 403
As Hornung points out, this center point changes the focus of the passage from we in the first half to Jesus in the second. The second half develops the example of Jesus which believers are to follow: His patient endurance (C), which is parallel to the patient endurance enjoined of them in the first half (C). Thus the chiasm with its central element emphasizes Jesus as the One who is the Model of the patient endurance God desires from believers; they are not expected to go it alone.11 Verse 1 The introduction of this new section is developed by a change in genre and mood. The previous chapter (11:1-40) was mainly historical; chapter (12:1) introduces a pastoral exhortation. The previous section was composed entirely
10
Man, Ronald E. "The Value of Chiasm for New Testament Interpretation." Bibliotheca Sacra (Dallas Theological Seminary) 141 (1084-2002): 146-154.:297 (Man 1084-2002, 297-298)
11
Page | 4
12
Girdwood, James, Verkruyse, Peter. Hebrews. Joplin, Mo. : College Press, 1997 (The College Press NIV Commentary), S. Heb 12:1
14
13
(Ellingworth 1993, 637) (Ellingworth 1993, 637) (Guthrie 1983, 248) (Girdwood and Verkruyse 1997, Heb 12:1) (Guthrie 1983, 248) (Westcott 1977, 392) (Lane 2002, 398)
15
16
17
18
19
20
Page | 5
(Brown 1961, 601) (Lane 1991, 408) Souza, Scott. "Consider Him." Reformation and Revival Ministries 8 (1999-2003): 108. (Souza 1999-2003, 108) (Guthrie 1983, 248-249) McArthur, John. The MacArthur New Testament Commentary Hebrews. Chicago: The Moody Bible Intstitute , 1983. 374. (Kistemaker 1984,366-367) (Bruce 1990, 333) (Lane 2002 , 398) (Ellingworth 1993, 683)
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Laying aside all/ every we are to lay aside or throw off everything that hinders. But it is sin that is particularly identified.32 the ..Sin despite the use of the definite article and the verbal objective between the definite article between the nouns, the writer does not indicate a particular sin or the nature of this sin, but he points to Sin itself.33 It is the Sin itself that we need to avoid, it weighs us down, entangles us and prevents us from competing effectively.34 easily entangling This word is difficult to translate or as F.F Bruce says, it defies easy translation.35 It points to something that surrounds and constricts the runner; Trotter suggests this term might have been coined to avoid having to use an entire phrase as an adjective.36 It seems to be there to help the reader focus on the word (sin as the weight that restricts us as we run). Brown sees even non sinful actions that may even be praiseworthy as entangling the Christian from running with diligence.37 This view may be fuelled by Vaccaris understanding of this word (Bib 39 (1958) 473-77, and RevistB 6 (1958) 235-41). He translates: Let us also set aside every encumbrance and superfluous equipment, and run the race this is other
31
(Girdwood and Verkruyse 1997 , Heb 12:1) ( Brown 1961, 607) (Kistemaker 1984, 371) (Kistemaker 1984, 367) (Bruce 1990, 336) (Trotter 1997, 140) (Brown 1961, 607-608)
32
33
34
35
36
37
let us run with perseverance this is the positive side of shedding of the unassay burdens of sin.40 The emphasis is that the Christian will complete the race, finish, not competing against others. 41 The image of the race is common in St Paul: 1 Cor. 9:24 ff.; Gal. 2:2; Phil. 2:16; 3:12; 2 Tim. 4:7. Compare Acts 13:25; 20:24; Rom. 9:16.42 The race is in this text is more of a marathon rather than a sprint as seen in the phrase ( ) persevere; we 43 need to have sustainable effort that can go the distance. set before us a participle that linguistically may be understood to define the race as laid out, prescribed, appointed, or alternatively as lying before, ahead.44 This race has been put before all believers in Jesus Christ. We are not just competing in a race or any race but a particular event set before us. 45 Verse 2 We have been encouraged by the cloud of great witnesses, we have seen their faith under trials and tribulations, and we have been exhorted to put off all that hinders that sin that easily entangles and run the race set before us.46 But we are not to look back at this great cloud and be distracted, no, they cheer us forward and our eyes are fixed on Jesus as we run. Jesus becomes the ultimate
38
(Lane 2002, 398) (Lane 2002,398) (Guthrie 1983, 249) (Ellingworth 1993, 639) (Westcott 1977, 396) Guthrie, George H. Hebrews. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998. 398. (Lane 2002 , 399) (Ellingworth 1993, 639) (MacArthur 1983, 378-379)
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
to fix ones eyes this compound present active participle from (away) and aw ((I see) signifies that we should look to (Jesus 48 ) and not be distracted. (Jesus) is the chief witness our eyes are to be on Him who is above the cloud of witness, to Him every eye should be turn while we look away from other distractions.49 We need to look to Jesus and away from distractions, we will see everything clearly if our eyes are on Him.50 Kistemaker notes that the name of Jesus is introduced so the reader will concentrate on his earthly life.51 The writer does not put Jesus among the heroes of the faith from chapter 11, but gives him special prominence above all else.52 founder, perfector, faith we look to Jesus because he is the founder and perfecter of our faith. You could translate as author; he is the champion, leader, forerunner and initiator.53 He is also the one who not only begins our faith but also brings it to a successful conclusion.54 This understanding helps to clarify the significance of . implies priority or preeminence in the exercise of faith precisely because of Jesus supremacy in bringing faith to complete realization and giving it a perfect basis through his suffering. 55 also has the idea of completeness, to be fulfilled, it emphasises the fact that Jesus is the very essence of completeness and perfection.56 Therefore (faith) is an
47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
(Westcott 1977, 396) (Kistemaker 1984, 371) (Souza 1999-2003, 111) (MacArthur 1983, 379) (Kistemaker 1984, 376) (Kistemaker 1984, 378) (Guthrie 1998, 398) (Souza 1999-2003, 111-112) (Lane 1991, 412) (Trotter 1997, 142)
56
Page | 9
a cross, despise, shame To die on a cross was not only a terrible way to die, but it was also the lowest depth of disgrace. A punishment that was given to those considered subhuman.64 Jesus is the subject of endurance as despised the shame of the cross65 To Jews there was particular shame to dying on a cross (Deuteronomy 21:23). The cross here is not metaphoric as in take up your cross daily (Luke 9:23) but this is clearly an historical reference to His death on a literal cross. 66
57 58
59 60
(Ellingworth 1993, 642) (Brown 1961, 612) 64 (Bruce 1990, 338) 65 (Attridge 1989, 357) 66 (Ellingworth 1993, 641-642)
Page | 10
(Ellingworth 1993, 242) (Kistemaker 1984, 369) 69 (Kistemaker 1984, 369) 70 (Kistemaker 1984, 369) 71 (Souza 1999-2003, 116-123) 72 (Kistemaker 1984, 371-372) 73 (Souza 1999-2003, 123) 74 (Kistemaker 1984, 369) 75 (Brown 1961, 616)
Page | 11
76 77
(Kistemaker 1984, 372) (Lane 1991, 400) 78 (Guthrie 1998, 400) 79 (Kistemaker 1984, 379) 80 (Brown 1961, 616-617) 81 (Girdwood and Verkruyse 1997, Heb 12: 3)
Page | 12
Page | 13