vankalapati2021
vankalapati2021
vankalapati2021
Dosage Forms
Correspondence Author:
Abstract:
developed and validated for the identification and quantification of the Moxifloxacin
has been achieved on a Agilent C18 (150 x 4.6) mm, 5m column with mobile phase (0.01M
Potassium dihydrogen ortho phosphate as buffer and methanol in the ratio of 70:30) eluted in
isocratic mode. The HPLC flow rate was 1.0 mL/minute and peaks were monitored at 230 nm
with Photo Diode Array (PDA) detector. The column over temp was kept constant at 30° C and
the injection volume was 10µl. The run time of method was 16 min. The method was validated
as per the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. Linearity was recorded
at various concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 1.5 µg/mL for all the Moxifloxacin impurities.
Linearity, regression value, recovery, %Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) of method precision
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not
been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may
lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as
doi: 10.1002/bmc.5192
Moxifloxacin was found to be specific, linear, accurate, precise, rugged and robust. The
validated method was suitable for quantification of the related substances in Moxifloxacin drug
product. The method was applied in Quality control lab for the analysis Moxifloxacin impurities
in stability analysis.
Introduction:
the fluoroquinolone family of medications. It usually results in bacterial death through blocking
inhibitor for carbon steel in 1M HCl solution with chemical and electrochemical methods at 250
II topoisomerase, and topoisomerase IV, enzymes necessary to separate bacterial DNA, thereby
inhibiting cell replication (Fouda et al., 2016; Prof. Richard Wise 1999). The chemical
Number of stability indicating HPLC methods for the self-determining analysis of Moxifloxacin
(Predrag Djurdjevic et al., 2009; M. Lalitha Devi & K. B. Chandrasekhar, 2009; Wu, Cai Sheng
et al., 2012; Razzaq, Syed Naeem et al., 2014; Syed Naeem Razzaq et al., 2012; Xander Van
Doorslaer et al., 2012; Attimarad et al., 2019; Momin, Mohammad A. M et al., 2018) reported in
the literature were followed good chromatographic integration practices as per USP <621>
our knowledge, no HPLC related substances method has been described for separation of five
The main objective of this study was to develop a rapid, sensitive and stability indicating HPLC
According to analytical method validation guidelines (Yuwono & Indrayanto, 2005; ICH
Guidelines, 2003; 2005); stability indicating HPLC analytical method is critical in estimating
the stability of the drugs in final formulations (Bakshi & Singh, 2002). In the current study
Performed forced degradation as per ICH condition and proved the stability indicating nature.
The forced degradation study under different stressed conditions (acid, base, peroxide, thermal,
UV and water) applied to separation of drugs from degradation products (Jain et al., 2013;
HPLC grade of methanol was purchased from Merck Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India. Water purified
on Millipore was used for throughout the analysis. The AR grade ortho phosphoric acid (OPA,
purity, 85 %), Triethyl amine, and potassium dihydrogen ortho phosphate (KH2PO4, purity 99.9
%) were purchased from SD fine chemicals, Mumbai, India. HPLC grade water used throughout
the experiments. Any other reagents or chemicals used were of analytical or HPLC grade.
Instruments:
The analysis was carried out using a HPLC 2695 SYSTEM with PDA detector integrated with
Empower 2 Software. The HPLC instrument consisted of a binary pump, an online degasser, an
detector used ranging from 200-400 nm. The data were collected and processed using Empower-
2 software from waters. The HPLC column is (150 x 4.6) mm, 5m, manufactured by Agilent
Technologies. Sartorius analytical balance range from for the 0.1g to 220 g used for preparation
of standard and samples. Bransonic ultrasonic baths used for extraction impurities from sample
matrix.
Chromatographic conditions:
The chromatographic separation was achieved with isocratic mobile phase. Prepared 10mM
and then finally adjusted pH to 4.8 with diluted orthophosphoric acid solution. Buffer and
methanol are mixed in the ratio of 70:30 v/v respectively. Mixture of buffer and methanol in the
ratio of 50:50 v/v was prepared for diluent purpose. The HPLC flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and
used Agilent (150 x 4.6) mm, 5m column, maintained temperature at 30° C. The injection
Each 0.5mg of Moxifloxacin standard and its impurities dimethoxy, hydroxy acid, methyl
stearate, dimethoxy acid and gati acid were accurately weighed and transferred to a 10 mL
volumetric flask and dissolved in small amount of diluent. The solution was sonicated for 5min
and the solution was making up with diluent to 10mL which gives 50ppm solution for each
component. 0.2 mL of the above solution was transferred to another 10 mL volumetric flask and
Weigh and transferred 149 mg of sample powder (Equivalent to 100 mg of Moxifloxacin) into a
100 mL volumetric flask. Added about 70 mL of diluent and shaken for 20 minutes by
mechanical or manually and further sonicated for 30 minutes. The solution was diluted up to the
mark with the diluent and filtered the solution through 0.45 µm PVDF filter.
The objective was to develop a new RS method to identify and separate close eluting
Moxifloxacin related substances like A, B, C, D and E with Moxifloxacin with smaller run time.
To achieve the objective, different methods were adopted by considering variables like column,
mobile phase composition and elution mode (Table 1). All the analytes are detected at 230 nm,
well resolved and system suitability chromatogram shows method specificity, hence the
Method Validation:
The proposed method was validated as per the international conference on harmonization (ICH
2005, Ashok et al., 2019) guidelines for the parameters-system suitability, specificity, method
System Suitability:
The standard mixture containing Moxifloxacin standard and its impurities (1µg/mL) injected
and analyzed as six replicates. The tailing factor, theoretical plate counts, RT and Resolution for
Moxifloxacin and its impurities were determined at first injection and observed satisfactory
results which are presented in Table-2. The % RSD of peak areas observed for Moxifloxacin:
0.5; Imp-A: 0.6; Imp-B: 0.7; Imp-C: 0.4; Imp-D: 0.7 and Imp-E: 1.0. The system suitability
Independent calibration curves for Moxifloxacin and its impurities were developed using the
levels ranging from 0.25 µg mL-1 to 1.5 µg mL-1 and generated by six concentration points. The
peak area versus concentration data was analyzed with least squares linear regression (Katakam
et al., 2020; Lakshmi et al., 2020). Correlation coefficient (r) and % y-intercept ratio to the
response of target concentration were found above 0.99 and below 5.0%, respectively,
indicating the good linearity of the method. Moxifloxacin and its impurity linearity results were
represented in Table-3.
Detection of a lower level of an analyte in a sample that can be detected as per the developed
chromatographic conditions and no need to be quantified an exact value (Dongala et al., 2019a;
2019b). Quantification at the lower most of analyte in a sample shall be quantified with
LOQ level were injected six times, RSD value of areas was found below the acceptance limit of
Accuracy / Recovery:
The accuracy of the optimized method was determined at three levels (LOQ, 50, 100 & 150%).
Prepared the samples at each level (n=3), then spiked with the impurity solution mixture at 0.5
µg mL-1, 1.0 µg mL-1 and 1.5 µg mL-1 for all impurities of Moxifloxacin. Each individual
impurity recovery was calculated by dividing the amount found in µg mL-1 with amount added
in µg mL-1. The % of recovery for each impurity was shown more than 95%. All the method
recovery results were shown in Table-3. Recovery RSD value of each related substance was
<2.0 % (n=9)
The method precision was evaluated by carrying out six independent preparations of a
homogenous test sample of Moxifloxacin drug product to specify the method reliability results
for a single batch with nominal concentrations spiking of impurities at 1ppm level. Six test
solutions of the single batch were analysed as per the proposed methodology and which was
considered as intra-day precision (Dongala et al., 2021; Subramnian et al., 2020). Inter-day
precision was evaluated from a total of six replicates with spiking of impurities at 1ppm level on
sample and analyzed on another day using different column and instrument. The precision was
expressed as the % RSD of measured responses. The results for Intra- and Inter-day precision
data for Moxifloxacin and its impurities in Moxifloxacin drug product were presented in Table-
3. The % RSD for all impurities in both intra- and inter- day precision data was < 10 and
difference between their mean of results was in the range of ±10, indicating that this method is
more precise. For both intra and inter precision study, peak tailing are observed 0.9 to 1.3 and
plate counts for Moxifloxacin, Imp-A, Imp-B, Imp-C, Imp-D and Imp-E were > 2000, >7000,
8000, > 8800, > 9500 and >9800 respectively. The developed method precision chromatograms
Specificity:
Specificity is the ability of the method to measure the analyte response in the presence of its
potential impurities. Stress testing of the drug substance can help to identify the likely
degradation products, which can in turn help to establish the degradation path ways and the
intrinsic stability of the molecule and validate the stability indicating power of the analytical
procedure used (Dongala et al., 2019; Palakurthi et al., 2020). In specificity test, no overlapping
peak was observed from diluent and placebo chromatograms at the retention time of
Moxifloxacin and its impurities. All impurity peaks are well separated from each other and
with purity plot and purity threshold for Moxifloxacin and its impurities, indicating no
interference of blank, placebo and other peaks with the retention time of Moxifloxacin and its
impurities.
The current regulatory frame work requires conducting forced degradation experiments under a
verity of conditions and separation of drugs from degradation products (Jain & Basniwal, 2013;
Subramanian et al., 2020; Thirupathi et al., 2018). Forced degradation study was evaluated for
acid, base, peroxide, thermal, UV and water. The purity angel and purity threshold data shows
that there are no co-eluting peaks for Moxifloxacin and its impurities in all degradation
conditions (Katakam et al., 2021a, 2021b). Mass balances show that the developed method is
Robustness:
In order to demonstrate the robustness of the method, system suitability parameters were
verified and test solution spiked with impurities at 1µg/mL limit, were tested by changing flow
rate by ±0.2 mL/min, column temperature by ±5 ◦C, mobile phase by ±10 units and mobile
phase pH variation with ±0.2 units. No significant difference was found between the normal and
altered conditions indicating the robustness of the method. The results showed that our
stability-indicating RS method was specific, precise, accurate and robust, and it could be used
for RS analyses of Moxifloxacin drug product during release analyses, stress-testing and
stability studies.
Stability of the standard and sample solutions was assessed from 0 to 24 hours at room
temperature and refrigerator conditions. The stability study results showed that no additional
peaks were observed, and the samples were stable for 24 hours at room temperature and
refrigerator. These results were consistent with the acceptance criteria of the Moxifloxacin drug
product.
Conclusion:
The developed and validated RS method for related substances in Moxifloxacin was simple,
specific, stable, linear, accurate, precise, rugged and robust in the range of 25-150% of
specification level. The method was found to meet the entire acceptance criteria as per ICH
guidelines. Based on the validation study results, it has been concluded that the developed
HPLC method for related substances in Moxifloxacin was suitable for routine analysis to
Conflict of interest
Acknowledgement:
Jagitial, Telangana state for providing opportunity to carry out this research work.
References:
Attimarad, M., Shahzad, C.M., Ahmed, B., Abdulmalek. (2019). Simultaneous Determination of
16(7), 1196.
Ashok, P. K., & Dongala, T. (2019). HPLC‐UV method development for the determination of
EDTA in oxycodone HCl Oral liquids with derivatization technique. Robustness by design of
Bakshi, M., & Singh, S. (2002). Development of validated stability-indicating assay method.
Dongala, T., Katari, N. K., Palakurthi, A. K., & Jonnalagadda, S. B. (2019a). Stability‐
Dongala, T., Palakurthi Vytla, V., & Karati, N. K. (2019b). A novel UPLC‐PDA isocratic
method for the quantification fulvestrant in oil‐based pre‐filled syringe injection matrix
Dongala, T., Katari, N. K., Palakurthi, A. K., & Jonnalagadda, S. B. (2019). Development and
validation of a generic RP‐HPLC PDA method for the simultaneous separation and
Fulvestrant injection 505(j) composition and impurities profile by capillary gas chromatography
and HPLC-PDA techniques. Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society volume, 18, 1443–1454.
Fouda, A. S., Shalabi, K., E-Hossiany, A. (2016). Moxifloxacin Antibiotic as Green Corrosion
Inhibitor for Carbon Steel in 1 M HCl. Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion, 2(3), 18.
ICH guidelines (2003). Stability testing of new drug substances and products. Q1A (R2), current
step, 4, 1-24.
ICH guidelines (2005). Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1). In
Jain, D., Basniwal, P.K. (2013). Forced degradation and impurity profiling: Recent trends in
Katakam, L.N.R., Dongala, T., Ettaboina, S.K. (2021a). Quality by design with design of
its impurities in soft gel dosage formulation. Biomedical Chromatography, 35, e5062.
Katakam, L.N.R., Dongala, T., Ettaboina, S.K. (2021b). A simple and rapid HPLC method for
approach for the development of a stability‐indicating LC method for benzonatate and its
impurities in liquid oral dosage form. Sepa Sci plus., 3(7), 276–
285. https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202000023.
Lalitha Devi, M., Chandrasekhar, K.B. (2009). A Validated, Specific Stability-Indicating RP-LC
Method for Moxifloxacin and Its Related Substances. Information Systems Division, National
Lakshmi, N. R. K., Dongala, T., & Ettaboina, S. K. (2020). Novel stability indicating UHPLC
Momin, M.A. M., Rangnekar, B., Das, S. C. (2018). Development and validation of a RP-HPLC
Palakurthi, A. K., Dongala, T., & Katakam, L. N. R. (2020). QbD based development of HPLC
Palakurthi, A. K., Thirupathi, D., Kumar, Y. R., & Jayashree, A. (2017). Simultaneous
Predrag. D., Andrija, C., Aleksandra, D., Milena, J. S. (2009). Optimization of separation and
Prof. Richard Wise (1999). A Review of the Clinical Pharmacology of Moxifloxacin, a New 8-
Razzaq, S. N., Ashfaq, M.K., Islam, U., Mariam, I., Razzaq, S.S., Azeem, W.
S1878535214002640
Syed Naeem, R., Islam Ullah, K., Irfana, M., Syed, S.R., (2012). Stability indicating HPLC
indicating RP‐HPLC method development and validation for determination of nine impurities in
apixaban tablet dosage forms. Robustness study by quality by design approach. Biomedical
Subramanian, V.B., Konduru, N., Katari, N.K., Dongala, T. (2020). A simple high‐
Thirupathi, D., Palakurthi, A. K., Velaveni, K. K., & Katari, N. K. (2018). Development and
validation of RP‐HPLC method for simultaneous determination of diclofenac potassium and its
process related impurities in solid Oral dosage form. Journal of Chromatography and Separation
Thirupathi, D., Palakurthi, A. K., Velaveni, K. K., & Karati, N. K. (2018). Development and
validation of RP‐HPLC method for simultaneous determination of diclofenac potassium and its
process related impurities in solid Oral dosage form. Journal of Chromatography and Separation
Thirupathi, D., Katari, N. K., Rao, K. L. N., & Palakurthi, A. K. (2020). Stability indicating LC
COVID‐19 and evaluation of risk assessment prior to method validation by quality by design
chromatography coupled with ultraviolet detection and Fourier transform ion cyclotron
156.
phthalimide (Imp-A):
(Imp-B)
Impurity (Imp-C)
Impurity (Imp-D)
(Imp-E)