EPU quality Assurance check list/ form number 001

1. Module evaluation /feedback by lecturers/professors

We would like to obtain feedback from you as a part of our evaluation and assessment on module quality
and completeness of overall teaching materials and milieu prepared for execution of the module. Your
feedback will be very valuable in recommending module revision and amendment as well as monitoring
continuously our modules. All feedbacks and comments will be used for the intended purpose and kept
confidential.

Module code: Community Policing

Module title: Community Policing

Intake (semester/yyyy): 2nd Semester 2016 E.C

Rank/ Full name/academic rank of the lecturer/professor : D/Com G/slassie Hailu (Lecturer)

Program the lecturer/professor has taught the module: Traffic Management and Road Saftey

Class/class year the lecturer/professor taught the module :- 2nd Year

Signature date the evaluation is filled 01/12/2016E.C

Please complete sections and return to module/program coordinator/department head or quality assurance
and relevance centre as soon as you finish the module in date not later than and final grade submission
date of each semester/term.

You can rate from 1 up to 5 from very poor/strongly disagree to very good/strongly agree or you might
write what you fill on the quality of the module freely.

Remark: 1= very poor/strongly disagree, 2=poor/disagree, 3=satisfactory/neutral, 4=good/agree and

5=very good/strongly agree

Part I: Module design and module quality

Measurement of module design and quality 1 2 3 4 5

1 Clarity of module objectives and its alignment with the curriculum 4

2 Alignment of Module contents with module description in the curriculum 4

3 Organization of contents to the desired objectives 2

4 Contents are updated and included recent research outcomes and

contemporary knowledge and skill. 2

5 Adequacy of contents of the module for attainment of the curriculum goal

and customer operational standard/competencies required by the market/3

6 Depth and completeness of module contents for the curriculum level and
national qualification frame work for /diploma/degree/post graduate
diploma/masters and above/2

7 Total duration given to module execution in terms of keynote,

developmental and workshop sessions adequate and relevant to the content
and level of students officers1

8 The exercises, cases and scenarios for each chapter/units of the module are
properly set 2

9 Assessment methods and mode is well designed to assess student officers

learning outcome and it is in accordance with the curriculum. 2

10 Methods of delivery of the module are well designed with competence based
curriculum principles, giving more emphasis to practical session and less to
theory. 2

11 Overall competency and quality of the module is satisfactory 2

12 Module requires revision 5

Other points you would to make/express on improving quality of the module and its components
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________
 2. Student Officers learning evaluation /feedback by lecturers/professors

You can rate from 1 up to 5 from very poor/strongly disagree to very good/strongly agree or you
might write what you fill on the quality of the module freely.

Remark: 1= very poor/strongly disagree, 2=poor/disagree, 3=satisfactory/neutral, 4=good/agree

and 5=very good/strongly agree

Part II: Student Officers learning

Measurements student officers learning and competence to learn 1 2 3 4 5

1 The level and content of the module has met the expectation of a majority of
student officers on the module 4

2 The medium of instruction is well prepared and up to the level of student

officers. 4

3 The attendance, participation and the discipline of the student officers in

class 5

4 Student officers’ performance in continuous group and individual

assessments. 5

5 Student officers assessment is satisfactory and they are competent 4

6 The university, the college, department, coordinators and teacher support

satisfactory. 1

7 You as lecturer/professor satisfied on the student officers learning 5

12 Module requires revision please edit your Questionnaire

Other you would like to comment on the student officers, readiness and capacity to learn, and their
overall learning competence __________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________

Part III: Class administration, Resources and teaching environment

Measurement of administration of the module. 1 2 3 4 5

1 The class room is equipped with(computer, audio visual , LCD, white board,
black board, pointer, etc…) all the necessary material and resources 1

2 The class size and facilities(internet, light, toilet, ventilation, water,

syndicates, etc..) in line with student officers number 1

3 The venue of the classes in conveniently located in suitable environment to

optimal learning. 1

4 The time schedule of the classes is suitable the module delivery for most
students 3

5 Program coordinators provide good support, follow up learning and assist

the optimum learning of student officers 3

6 You are satisfied with the module execution and administration of learning
the module 3

5 You will teach and train different modules here in the future 4

12 Administration requires amendment 5

Other comments you would like to provide that improves good administration of modules and lifts up
quality teaching and student officers learning in future______________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________

Part IV: other general comments

1. What do you like best in teaching the module and about EPU overall ?

2. What do you dislike most about the module and overall execution of the module?
3. How would you suggest us to improve quality and what do you recommend for the improvement
of quality educational process at EPU based on your experience ?