Week_10_-_Contextualized_Design
Week_10_-_Contextualized_Design
Week_10_-_Contextualized_Design
Design
CONTEXTUAL DESIGN: THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND
DECOLONISING DESIGN
1. Historical Background
In 1945, WWII ended and thus colonies disbanded from their colonizers (obviously
not every single one but most of them). It was the end of colonialism.
Postcolonialism is a term used to recognize the continued and troubling presence
and influence of colonialism within the period we designate as “after-the-colonial”. It
refers to the ongoing effects that colonial encounters, dispossession and power have
in shaping the familiar structures (such as social, political, spatial, uneven global
interdependencies) of the present world. Postcolonialism, in itself, questions the end
of colonialism.
1. The world was divided into East and West due to the Cold War.
2. Colonial empires dissolved and created a divide of the Global North and the
Global South.
This reflects today in global politics, for example, through narratives of development
and developmental aid.
"More than half the people of the world are living in conditions approaching misery.
Their food is inadequate. They are victims of disease. Their economic life if primitive
and stagnant. Their poverty is a handicap and a threat both to them and to more
prosperous areas. For the first time in history, humanity possesses the knowledge
and he skill to relieve the suffering of these people. / The United States is pre-
eminent among nations in the development of industrial resources which we can
afford to use for the assistance of other peoples are limited. But our imponderable
resources in technical knowledge are constantly growing and inexhaustible. /
Fourth, we must embark on a bold new program for making th benefits of out
Why are the terms “developed country” / “developing country” and “development” /
“underdevelopment” problematic? Think of Franz Boas and how he came to define
cultures and societies.
It can be commonly applied. Countries at the core of the periphery are those of the
Global North: economically, and politically powerful in the global context. Countries
at the periphery of the model are those of the Global South: economically, politically,
and culturally weak in the global context. These perceptions can change, many East
Asian countries were considered to be of the periphery but are now powerful, like
Japan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjr5NuZv2e4&t
2. Decolonizing Design
“Our objective - as design scholars and practitioners - is to transform the very terms
of present day design studies and research. Designers can put to task their skills,
techniques, and mentalities to designing futures aimed at advancing ecological,
social, and technological conditions where multiple worlds and knowledges involving
humans and nonhumans, can flourish in mutually enhancing ways.”
Taste is often derived from what we are exposed to during our upbringing. Design
values and history is taught through a canon: the accepted pantheon of work by
predominantly European and American male designers that sets the basis for what
is deemed ‘good’ or ‘bad’.
This has undermined the woes produced by non-western cultures and those from
poorer backgrounds. Ghanian textiles get cast as craft rather than design, for
example. Classifying traditional craft as different from modern design deems the
histories and practices of design from many cultures as inferior.
We should aim to eliminate the false distinctions between craft and design, in order
to recognize all cultural important forms of making. Design thinking rhetoric is
similarly exclusive, to frame design thinking as a progressive narrative of global
salvation ignores alternative ways of knowing.
Decolonizing is allowing the most vulnerable to choose the music, plan the
food, etc., for the party.
Consider how people of different ethnicities may identify with what you are
creating.
Remember The Designer’s Critical Alphabet that we saw in the lecture and used in
Assignment 2. it is for:
For students introduction to new topic through a gamified approach, making less
heavy to tackle and think about and discuss.
“If you invite students to choose who they will design for, you might discover that
they won choose to design for people like you. This was my discovery while teaching
at an elite, private university in California in 2019. Six student teams were invited to
choose their users for a design assignment. None of the groups chose to design for
anyone like me — not women of color, not single parents juggling life and their
children’s schedule, not immigrants or non-Americans trying to understand American
life and systems, and not for people in their late 40s. However I was struck by who
was chosen. Five of the groups chose to design for males (including the group that
chose to design for a boy). Four of them designed for middle-class people. Only one
group chose to design for a woman, and they weren’t able to identify challenges she
faced as a woman. None of the target users were Black or Indigenous people of
color. Why were students choosing to solve problems for people who faces so few
structural problems?”