Rural Development: Administration and Planning

KHU-701

Unit-3
Syllabus
Panchayati Raj & Rural Administration: Administrative Structure: bureaucracy,
structure of administration; Panchayati Raj Institutions Emergence and Growth of
Panchayati Raj Institutions in India; People and Panchayati Raj; Financial
Organizations in Panchayati Raj Institutions, Structure of rural finance, Government &
Non-Government Organizations / Community Based Organizations, Concept of Self help
group.

Objectives of Panchayati Raj & Rural Administration:

1. Decentralization: Transfer power and decision-making to local self-government

institutions, enhancing local governance.
2. Local Development: Address local needs and priorities through community-based
planning and implementation of development projects.
3. Empowerment: Empower rural communities, especially marginalized groups, to
participate in governance and development.
4. Efficient Resource Utilization: Optimize the use of local resources and ensure
targeted delivery of services and programs.
5. Transparency and Accountability: Foster greater transparency and accountability in
the administration of rural areas.

Importance of Panchayati Raj & Rural Administration:

1. Enhanced Governance: Brings decision-making closer to the people, making

governance more responsive and effective.
2. Community Participation: Encourages active participation of local residents in the
development process, leading to more relevant and effective solutions.
3. Local Development: Facilitates the implementation of tailored development
initiatives that address specific local needs and priorities.
4. Resource Management: Improves the management and allocation of resources by
aligning them with local requirements and conditions.
5. Democratic Empowerment: Strengthens democratic practices at the grassroots level,
promoting inclusivity and political engagement in rural areas.

Relevance of Panchayati Raj & Rural Administration:

1. Decentralized Governance: Empowers local self-government, making decision-

making more accessible and responsive to the needs of rural communities.
2. Local Representation: Ensures that rural populations have a voice in governance and
development, leading to more equitable and inclusive decision-making.
3. Tailored Development: Allows for development projects and policies that are
specifically designed to address local issues and priorities.
4. Enhanced Accountability: Promotes transparency and accountability in the
administration of rural areas by involving local representatives in governance.

1
 5. Empowerment: Strengthens the role of local leaders and communities in managing
their own affairs, fostering grassroots democracy.

Application of Panchayati Raj & Rural Administration:

1. Local Planning: Panchayats develop and implement community-based plans for

infrastructure, education, healthcare, and other essential services.
2. Resource Management: Oversee and allocate resources for local projects, ensuring
that funds are used effectively to meet community needs.
3. Service Delivery: Manage and deliver services such as clean water, sanitation, and
road maintenance at the local level.
4. Community Engagement: Facilitate community participation in decision-making
processes, ensuring that development initiatives reflect the needs and preferences of
local residents.
5. Monitoring and Evaluation: Monitor the implementation of development projects
and evaluate their impact, making adjustments as necessary to improve outcomes.

By focusing on these areas, Panchayati Raj and Rural Administration play a crucial role in
fostering sustainable and inclusive development in rural areas.

Advantages of Panchayati Raj & Rural Administration:

1. Decentralization of Power: Empowers local governments to make decisions based

on local needs and priorities, enhancing the relevance and effectiveness of
governance.
2. Increased Participation: Encourages greater community involvement in decision-
making processes, leading to more inclusive and representative governance.
3. Improved Service Delivery: Facilitates the delivery of essential services like
healthcare, education, and infrastructure at the local level, improving accessibility and
efficiency.
4. Enhanced Accountability: Local officials are more directly accountable to their
communities, which can lead to better governance and reduced corruption.
5. Local Development: Promotes tailored development initiatives that address specific
local issues and utilize local resources effectively.
6. Strengthened Democracy: Fosters grassroots democracy by involving citizens in
local governance, which can enhance civic engagement and political awareness.

Disadvantages of Panchayati Raj & Rural Administration:

1. Limited Resources: Local bodies often have limited financial and administrative
resources, which can constrain their ability to implement and manage development
projects effectively.
2. Capacity Constraints: Rural administrations may lack the technical expertise and
training needed for efficient governance and project management.
3. Political Instability: Local political conflicts and power struggles can hinder
effective governance and development efforts.
4. Inequality: There can be disparities in the effectiveness of Panchayati Raj
institutions, with some areas benefiting more than others due to varying levels of local
leadership and resources.

2
 5. Bureaucratic Inefficiencies: Administrative delays and inefficiencies at the local
level can affect the timely implementation of projects and services.
6. Corruption Risks: Local governance can be susceptible to corruption and nepotism
if not adequately monitored and regulated.

Overall, while Panchayati Raj and Rural Administration offer numerous benefits by
decentralizing governance and empowering local communities, they also face challenges
related to resource constraints, capacity, and governance issues. Addressing these challenges
is crucial for maximizing the effectiveness of Panchayati Raj and Rural Administration.

COURSE OUTCOME: After completion of the course student will be able to:
Students will have a clear idea about the area development programmes and its impact.

Notes

Evolution of Panchayati Raj System

The foundation of the present local self-government in India was laid by the Panchayati Raj

System (1992). But the history of Panchayati Raj starts from the self-sufficient and self-

governing village communities. In the time of the Rig-Veda (1700 BC), evidence suggests

that self-governing village bodies called ‘sabhas’ existed. With the passage of time, these

bodies became panchayats (council of five persons). Panchayats were functional institutions

of grassroots governance in almost every village. They endured the rise and fall of empires in

the past, to the current highly structured system.The village panchayat, as a system of

administration, began in the British days, as their offer to satisfy the demands for local

autonomy. They opened up the governance of the lowest levels to the citizens. The

Government of India act, 1935 also authorizes the provinces to enact legislations. Even

though such minor forms of local governance was evident in India, the framers of the

3
constitutions, unsatisfied with the existing provisions, included Article 40 among the

Directive Principles, whereby:

“The state shall take steps to organize village panchayats and endow them with such

powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-

government.”

Later, the conceptualisation of the system of local self-government in India took place

through the formation and effort of four important committees from the year 1957 to 1986.

(a) Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957)

Originally appointed by the Government of India to examine the working of two of its earlier

programs, the committee submitted its report in November 1957, in which the term

‘democratic decentralization’ first appears. The important recommendations are:

 Establishment of a three-tier Panchayati Raj system – gram panchayat at village level

(direct election), panchayat Samiti at the block level and Zila Parishad at the district

level (indirect election).

 District Collector to be the chairman of Zila Parishad.

 Transfer of resources and power to these bodies to be ensured.

The existent National Development Council accepted the recommendations. However, it did

not insist on a single, definite pattern to be followed in the establishment of these institutions.

Rather, it allowed the states to devise their own patterns, while the broad fundamentals were

to be the same throughout the country.Rajasthan (1959) adopted the system first, followed by

4
Andhra Pradesh in the same year. Some states even went ahead to create four-tier systems

and Nyaya panchayats, which served as judicial bodies.

(b) Ashok Mehta Committee (1977-1978)

The committee was constituted by the Janata government of the time to study Panchayati Raj

institutions. Out of a total of 132 recommendations made by it, the most important ones are:

 Three-tier system to be replaced by a two-tier system.

 Political parties should participate at all levels in the elections.

 Compulsory powers of taxation to be given to these institutions.

 Zila Parishad to be made responsible for planning at the state level.

 A minister for Panchayati Raj to be appointed by the state council of ministers.

 Constitutional recognition to be given to Panchayati Raj institutions.

Unfortunately, the Janata government collapsed before action could be taken on these

recommendations.

(c) G V K Rao Committee (1985)

Appointed by the Planning Commission, the committee concluded that the developmental

procedures were gradually being taken away from the local self-government institutions,

resulting in a system comparable to ‘grass without roots’.

 Zila Parishad to be given prime importance and all developmental programs at that

level to be handed to it.

 Post of DDC (District Development Commissioner) to be created acting as the chief

executive officer of the Zila Parishad.

 Regular elections to be held

(d) L M SinghviCommitee (1986)

Constituted by the Rajiv Gandhi government on ‘Revitalisation of Panchayati Raj institutions

for Democracy and Development’, its important recommendations are:

5
  Constitutional recognition for PRI institutions.

 Nyaya Panchayats to be established for clusters of villages

Though the 64th Constitutional Amendment bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha in 1989

itself, Rajya Sabha opposed it. It was only during the Narasimha Rao government’s term that

the idea finally became a reality in the form of the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment

acts, 1992.

Panchayati Raj System under 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment acts, 1992

The acts of 1992 added two new parts IX and IX-A to the constitution. It also added two new

schedules–11 and 12 which contains the lists of functional items of Panchayats and

Municipalities. It provides for a three-tier system of Panchayati Raj in every state – at the

village, intermediate and district levels. Panchayat and Municipality are the generic terms for

the governing body at the local level. Both exist as three tier systems – at the lower,

intermediate and upper levels.

The 73rd Constitutional Amendment act provides for a Gram Sabha as the foundation of the

Panchayati Raj system. It is essentially a village assembly consisting of all the registered

voters in the area of the panchayat. The state has the power to determine what kind of powers

it can exercise, and what functions it has to perform at the village level. The 74th

Constitutional Amendment act provides for three types of Municipalities:

 Nagar Panchayat for a transitional area between a rural and urban area.

 Municipal Council for a small urban area.

 Municipal Corporation for a large urban area.

Municipalities represent urban local self-government. Most of the provisions of the two acts

are parallel, differing only in the fact that they are being applied to either a Panchayat or a

Municipality respectively. Each Gram sabha is the meeting of a particular constituency called

6
ward. Each ward has a representative chosen from among the people themselves by direct

election.The chairperson of the Panchayat or Municipality at the intermediate and district

level are elected from among these representatives at the immediately lower level by indirect

election.

Three-tier structure of Panchayati Raj

(a) Gram Panchayat (village level)

Gram Panchayats are at the lowest level of Panchayat Raj institutions (PRIs), whose legal

authority is the 73rd Constitutional Amendment of 1992, which is concerned with rural local

governments. The Gram Panchayat is divided into wards and each ward is represented by a

Ward Member or Commissioner, also referred to as a Panch or Panchayat Member, who is

directly elected by the villagers. The Panchayat is chaired by the president of the village,

known as a Sarpanch. The term of the elected representatives is five years. The Secretary of

the Panchayat is a non-elected representative, appointed by the state government, to oversee

Panchayat activities. A Gram panchyat's term of office is five years. Every five years

elections take place in the village. All people over the age of 18 who are residents of the

territory of that village's Gram panchayat can vote. For women's empowerment and to

encourage participation of women in the democratic process, the government of India has set

some restrictions on Gram panchayat elections, reserving one-third of the seats for women, as

well as reserving seats for scheduled castes and tribes.

Functions of Panchayat

All Panchayati Raj Institutions perform such functions as are specified in state laws relating

to panchayati raj. Some States distinguish between obligatory (compulsory) and optional

functions of Gram Panchayats while other States do not make this distinction.

7
  The civic functions relating to sanitation, cleaning of public roads, minor irrigation,

public toilets and lavatories, primary health care, vaccination, the supply of drinking

water, constructing public wells, rural electrification, social health and primary and

adult education, etc. are obligatory functions of village panchayats.

 The optional functions depend on the resources of the panchayats. They may or may

not perform such functions as tree plantation on roadsides, setting up of breeding

centers for cattle, organizing child and maternity welfare, promotion of agriculture,

etc.

 After the 73rd Amendment, the scope of functions of Gram Panchayat was widened.

Such important functions like preparation of annual development plan of panchayat

area, annual budget, relief in natural calamities, removal of encroachment on public

lands and implementation and monitoring of poverty alleviation programmes are now

expected to be performed by panchayats.

 Selection of beneficiaries through Gram Sabhas, public distribution system, non-

conventional energy source, improved Chullahs, biogas plants have also been given to

Gram Panchayats in some states.

(b) Mandal Parishad or Block Samiti or Panchayat Samiti (block level)

The second or middle tier of the Panchayati Raj is Panchayat Samiti, which provides a link

between Gram Panchayat and a Zila Parishad. The strength of a Panchayat Samiti also

depends on the population in a Samiti area. In Panchayat Samiti, some members are directly

elected.Sarpanchs of Gram Panchayats. Sarpanchs of Gram Panchayats are ex-officio

members of Panchayat Samitis. However, all the Sarpanchs of Gram Panchayats are not

members of Panchayat Samitis at the same time.The number varies from State to State and is

rotated annually. It means that only chairpersons of some Gram Panchayats in a Samiti area

are members of Panchayat Samiti at a time.In some panchayats, members of Legislative

8
Assemblies and Legislative Councils, as well as members of Parliament who belong to the

Samiti area, are co-opted as its members. Chairpersons of Panchayat Samitis are, elected

indirectly- by and from amongst the elected members thereof.

Functions of Panchayat Samiti

 Panchayat Samitis are at the hub of developmental activities.

 They are headed by Block Development Officers (B.D.Os).

 Some functions are entrusted to them like agriculture, land improvement, watershed

development, social and farm forestry, technical and vocational education, etc.

 The second type of functions relates to the implementation of some specific plans,

schemes or programmes to which funds are earmarked. It means that a Panchayat

Samiti has to spend money only on that specific project. The choice of location or

beneficiaries is, however, available to the Panchayat Samiti.

(c) Zila Parishad (district level)

Zila Parishad or district Panchayat is the uppermost tier of the Panchayati Raj system. This

institution has some directly elected members whose number differs from State to State as it

is also based on population. Chairpersons of Panchayat Samitis are ex-officio members of

Zila Parishads. Members of Parliament, Legislative Assemblies and Councils belonging to

the districts are also nominated members of Zila Parishads. The chairperson of a Zila

Parishad, called Adhyaksha or President is elected indirectly-by and from amongst the

elected members thereof. The vice-chairperson is also elected similarly. Zila Parishad

meetings are conducted once a month. Special meetings can also be convened to discuss

special matters. Subject committees are also formed. Zila Parishad meetings are conducted

once a month. Special meetings can also be convened to discuss special matters. Subject

committees are also formed.

9
Functions of Zila Parishad

 Zila Parishad links Panchayat Samitis within the district.

 It coordinates their activities and supervises their functioning.

 It prepares district plans and integrates Samiti plans into district plans for submission

to the State Government.

 Zila Parishad looks after development works in the entire district.

 It undertakes schemes to improve agricultural production, exploit ground water

resources, extend rural electrification and distribution and initiate employment

generating activities, construct roads and other public works.

 It also performs welfare functions like relief during natural calamities and scarcity,

the establishment of orphanages and poor homes, night shelters, the welfare of women

and children, etc.

 In addition, Zila Parishads perform functions entrusted to them under the Central and

State Government sponsored programmes. For example, Jawahar Rozgar Yojna is a

big centrally sponsored scheme for which money is directly given to the districts to

undertake employment-generating activities.

Structural transformation of rural finance in India

In 1947, with the help of survey, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recorded that moneylenders

and other informal lenders met more than 90% of the rural credit needs. The share of banks

was only about 1 % of the total rural household debt.The increasing amount of

institutionalization of rural finance led to the structural transformation. The major emphasis

was given during the Fourth Five-Year Plan (1969–1974) following bank nationalization and

by setting up of NABARD (National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development), the

10
formation of Self-Help Group (SHG)—bank linkage and the setting up of Micro Finance

Institutions (MFIs).

The entire phase of rural credit provisioning in independent India can be classified into three

phases.

 First from the 1950s up to the mid-1960s when cooperatives were the main

institutional setups.

 Second, the 1970s and 1980s when commercial banks and RRBs (Regional Rural

Banks) played the dominating role in institutional credit disbursement.

 The final phase starting from the reform period in the early 1990s to the present which

observes the restructuring of the banking system, the emergence of SHGs, and a

growing number of MFIs.

The entire structural transformation process can be divided into four phases:

(a) Increasing dominance of cooperatives

 The introduction of cooperatives is the earliest attempt at institutionalization of rural

finance.

 The cooperative credit movement in India started with the passing of the Cooperative

Societies Act in 1904. It came into force following the Fourth Five-year Plan (1969–

1974).

 The aim of cooperatives is to fulfil the short, medium and the long-term credit needs

of the rural households.

(b) Bank nationalization and dominance of commercial banks

 The share of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) in total institutional credit has

gradually increased since the nationalization of banks in 1969.

11
  After bank nationalization, RBI made it mandatory for commercial banks to cover the

unbanked rural and semi urban areas. Each bank would have to open at least three

branches in unbanked rural or semi urban areas.

(c) Establishment of NABARD and Bank—Self-Help Groups (SHGs) Linkage

 With this establishment of NABARD (National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development) in July 1982 the government has widened its role in rural credit from

‘‘agricultural development’’ to ‘‘rural development.’’

 NABARD approves short, medium, and long-term credits and facilitate the

development of bank–SHGs linkage.

 NABARD provides refinance support to banks at very low interest rates for financing

SHGs. As most of the SHGs comprise women members so empowerment of rural

women was achieved.

 The government has introduced Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF) in

1995–1996 in NABARD. The fund is created to finance various rural infrastructure

projects such as irrigation, road, bridges, watershed, cold storage, fisheries, inland

waterways development, etc.

(d) Introduction and commercialization of Micro Finance

 The most recent innovation toward institutionalization of the rural credit system is the

introduction of microfinance.

 MFIs in India have non-profit motivation on one hand and profit maximization for

long-term on the other hand.

 It has evolved as an attractive and cost-effective mechanism to reach financial

services to the rural poor.

 MFIs has eliminated the basic problems of incorrect client identification and mitigate

repayment risks to a great extent.

12
  MFIs are more aggressive and innovative to reach the rural poor than the formal

banking system. They not only provide loan for productive purposes but also for

consumption purposes.

Self-help groups

Self-Help Groups (SHGs) are the people who choose to come together to find ways to

improve their living conditions.It can be defined as self-governed group of people with

similar socio-economic background and having a desire to collectively perform common

purpose.Villages face numerous problems related to poverty, illiteracy, lack of skills, lack of

formal credit etc. These problems cannot be tackled at an individual level and need collective

efforts.Thus SHG can become a vehicle of change for the poor and marginalized. SHG rely

on the idea of “Self Help” to encourage self-employment and to reduce poverty.

Functions

 It looks to build the functional capacity of the poor and the marginalized in the field

of employment and in the income generating activities.

 It resolves conflicts through collective leadership and mutual discussion.

 It provides collateral free loan with terms decided by the group at the market driven

rates. The poor collect their savings and save it in banks. In return they receive easy

access to loans with a small rate of interest to start their micro unit enterprise.

 Consequently, Self-Help Groups have emerged as the most effective mechanism for

delivery of microfinance services to the poor.

Need for SHGs

 One of the reasons for rural poverty in our country is low access to credit and

financial services.

13
  A Committee constituted under the chairmanship of Dr. C. Rangarajan to prepare a

comprehensive report on Financial Inclusion in the Country identified some major

reasons for lack of financial inclusion:

o Inability to provide collateral security

o Inadequate reach of the institutions

 The existence of sound community networks in villages is increasingly being

recognised as one of the most important elements of credit linkage in the rural areas.

 SHGs help in accessing credit to the poor and thus, play a critical role in poverty

reduction.

 SHGs help to build social capital among the poor, especially women. This empowers

women and gives them greater voice in the society.

Benefits of SHGs

(i) Social integrity: SHGs take action to stop practices like dowry, alcoholism etc.

(ii) Gender Equity: SHGs empowers women and develop leadership skill among them.

Empowered women participate more actively in gram sabha and elections. Self-Help Groups

formation has a multiplier effect in improving women’s status in society as well as in the

family leading to improvement in their socio-economic condition and also enhances their

self-esteem.

(iii) Voice to marginalized section: Most of the beneficiaries of government schemes have

been from weaker and marginalized communities and hence their participation through SHGs

ensures social justice.

(iv) Financial Inclusion: The SHG-Bank linkage programme pioneered by NABARD has

made access to credit easier and reduced the dependence on traditional money lenders and

other non-institutional sources.

14
(v) Improving efficiency of government schemes and reducing corruption through social

audits.

(vi) Alternate source of employment: It eases dependency on agriculture by providing

support in setting up micro-enterprises like tailoring, grocery, and tool repair shops.

(vii) Financial independence: Financial independence through self-employment has many

externalities such as improved literacy levels, better health care and even better family

planning.

(viii) Changes in consumption pattern: It has enabled the participating households to spend

more on education, food and health than non-client households.

(ix) Impact on housing & health: The financial inclusion attained through SHGs has led to

reduced child mortality, improved maternal health and the ability of the poor to take action to

prevent disease through better nutrition, housing and health–especially among women and

children.

Need for increased funding to Panchayats

The panchayats gained prominence as crucial nodal points during the COVID-19 as they ran

isolation centres, medical camps, and contact tracing. However, they faced a lot of challenges

during the lockdown period as for most panchayats it was difficult to provide food at short

notice. Hence, the Panchayati Raj Ministry has proposed to set up community kitchens in

each panchayat that will be operated by the local self-help groups (SHGs).

 The utilisation rate for Finance Commission grants between 2015 and 2019 stands at

78% and the allocations had tripled between the 13th and 14th Commissions.

 The role of panchayats becomes more important post lockdown period because now

the newly returned migrant workers will also depend on them to generate employment

under the Garib Kalyan Rojgar Abhiyan.

15
  The 2.63 lakh panchayats across the country have 29 functions under their ambit,

according to the 11th Schedule of the Constitution. Road construction, its

maintenance and drinking water supply are the major projects carried out by

panchayats using FC grants.

Sources of funds for the various levels of Panchayati Raj System

(a) Gram Panchayat (village level)

The income of the gram panchayat comes from:

 Collection of taxes on houses, market places etc.

 Government scheme funds received through various departments of the government–

through the Janpad and Zila Panchayats.

 Donations for community works etc

(b) Mandal Parishad or Block Samiti or Panchayat Samiti (block level)

The income of the panchayat samiti comes from:

 Land and water use taxes, professional taxes, liquor taxes and others

 Income-generating programmes

 Grants-in-aid and loans from the state government and the local zila parishad

 Voluntary contributions

(c) Zila Parishad (district level)

The income of the zila parishad comes from:

 Income from taxes levied by Zila Parishad, license fees and market fees

 A share is given to Zila Parishad from the collected land revenue

 Income from various properties of Zila Praishad

 Grants from the State and Central governments

 Funds allotted by the State for developmental activities.

16
Role of bureaucracy in India

Ans: Grass roots bureaucracy are the officials consisting at the district and its below level.

The officials in these institutions are directly responsible for implementing the welfare

schemes for the people. There are three pillars that form the basic structures of these

institutions i.e state government departments responsible for planning, collector responsible

for coordinating and act as a executive officer at the district level and at last is the

democratically elected local government. Even though the schemes are well planned, the

implementation has the major shortcomings. It is due to centralization of power, lack of

coordination, lack of skilled field officers, rigid mode of working etc. Scrutinizing the

implementation failure is the need of the hour which prevents the wastage of resources which

is planned for effective implementation.

Problems

(a) Centralization of powers

Though, at the district level collector is the chief executive officer of various government

welfare schemes, state departments hold the district offices tightly. Collector has huge

authority over the police and revenue department but comparatively less over personnel in

district level offices which makes coordination more difficult at the district level. Offices at

different geographical units and the non-acceptance of single authority as a coordinating body

makes the things even worse. Local Government who are well aware of the needs and

problems of the local people are helpless as they are disempowered to do so. Local

government are responsible for implementing the socio economic development schemes but

they are disempowered by state government as the financial autonomy is under voluntary

provision despite of 73rd CAA. Because of this disempowerment, local government got

caught in between the public demands and lack of actual authority.

17
(b) Lack of skilled officers

We have doctors, engineers and other professionals but we lack of nutritionists, health

administrators who are all needed to implement the schemes at grass root level. There is

shortage of personnel as number of people per official is too huge which is unavoidable in

our country. Because of this official carry huge workload and often they tend to concentrate

on the works where the superior pressure in intense.

(c) Mode of working

Officials define their terms based on the implementation programmes rather than the goals

that are set by implementation programmes. It is because of their that they are confined only

to implement the plan and not caring about the future results.These problems faced by

officials subsumes the great amount work involved every year for planning and also the

government initiatives.

Reforms

The reforms are the need of the hour as it severely affects the quality of the programmes

initiated by the government. The less effectiveness involves the wastage of resources in the

country which are limited. So for effective implementation and optimum use of resources and

for the benefit of the people and in a view that benefit should go to the people effectively, the

reforms must be undertaken.

(i) Technology must be used at the max level to ensure the sync between state and district

officials rather than officials and the local community.

(ii) Decentralization and devolution of powers should be done.

(iii) Corruption has to be reduced by encouraging social audits, RTI etc.

(iv) Unproductive working process should be weaned away and management principles has

to be applied for the effective working of the institutions at the low cost.

18
The optimum level of bureaucracy at the grass root level is the need of the hour as they are

the real executive bodies who has a direct contact with the people. Reduction of corruption,

prevention of excessive centralization, coordination among the state and district level

institutions, empowering of redressal mechanism, giving financial and administrative powers

to the local governmental bodies need to be done in order to realize the Gandhian principles.

Caselet: Empowering Communities Through Self-Help Groups

Background:

In the rural village of Samudrapur, poverty and lack of financial resources have long been
significant challenges. The villagers, primarily engaged in agriculture, often face difficulties
accessing credit and other financial services. Traditional banking systems are distant, and the
villagers have limited financial literacy.

The Initiative:

In 2018, a local NGO, "Rural Prosperity Foundation," initiated a program to establish Self-
Help Groups (SHGs) in Samudrapur. The goal was to empower villagers by providing them
with a platform for collective savings and credit.

Formation of SHGs:

The NGO organized a series of meetings to explain the concept of SHGs. A Self-Help Group
is essentially a small, informal association of people who come together to achieve common
goals. Each member contributes a fixed amount regularly to a common fund, which is then
used to provide small loans to members at low interest rates. The group also collectively
decides on how to utilize the funds and ensures repayment.

Implementation:

In Samudrapur, SHGs were formed with 10-15 members each, primarily consisting of
women. The members began by pooling their savings into a shared fund. To foster trust and
cooperation, the NGO facilitated workshops on financial literacy, group management, and
basic accounting.

Impact:

1. Financial Inclusion:
o Members who previously had no access to credit were now able to secure
small loans for personal or agricultural needs. This access to finance helped
them invest in better seeds, tools, and other inputs, leading to improved crop
yields.

19
 2. Empowerment and Skill Development:
o Women in the SHGs developed leadership and management skills as they took
on roles such as group treasurer or chairperson. They also gained confidence
in managing finances and making collective decisions.
3. Community Building:
o The SHGs fostered a sense of community and mutual support. Members
helped each other with business ideas and shared best practices, leading to a
collaborative spirit within the village.
4. Economic Improvement:
o The improved financial stability and access to resources led to a noticeable
rise in the villagers' income levels. This, in turn, contributed to better living
conditions and reduced poverty.

Challenges:

While the initiative was largely successful, it faced challenges such as:

 Initial Resistance: Some villagers were skeptical about the concept and hesitant to
participate initially.
 Group Dynamics: Managing group dynamics and ensuring that all members adhered
to the rules required ongoing effort and mediation.
 Sustainability: Ensuring the long-term sustainability of the SHGs required
continuous support and training from the NGO.

Conclusion:

The self-help groups in Samudrapur demonstrated the power of collective action in

addressing financial and social challenges. By pooling resources and working together, the
villagers not only improved their economic conditions but also strengthened their community
bonds. The success of this initiative highlights the potential of self-help groups as a model for
sustainable development and empowerment in rural areas.

You said:

caselet on Concept of Self help group with questions

ChatGPT said:

ChatGPT

Caselet: Transforming Lives Through Self-Help Groups

Background:

In the small town of Shanthinagar, many low-income families faced economic instability due
to irregular employment and limited access to financial resources. Traditional financial
institutions were either inaccessible or unwilling to offer small loans to these families,
exacerbating their financial struggles.

The Initiative:

20
In early 2022, a local development organization named "Hope for All" launched a project to
introduce Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in Shanthinagar. The primary aim was to empower
residents by creating a community-based system for savings and credit.

Formation of SHGs:

Hope for All organized several community meetings to introduce the concept of SHGs. Each
SHG was to be a small group of 12-15 people from the same neighborhood or social circle,
coming together to pool their savings. Members would contribute a fixed amount
periodically, and the collected funds would be used to provide low-interest loans to members
in need.

Implementation:

1. Group Formation:
o 15 SHGs were established with diverse membership, including both men and
women. Each group selected its own leaders and set rules for savings and loan
repayments.
2. Training and Support:
o The organization provided training on financial management, record-keeping,
and group dynamics. Regular workshops helped members understand their
roles and responsibilities.
3. Loan Disbursement and Impact:
o Loans were issued to members for various purposes, including starting small
businesses, improving agricultural practices, and addressing emergency needs.
As a result, members experienced increased financial stability and were able to
improve their livelihoods.

Impact:

1. Enhanced Financial Access:

o SHG members gained access to financial resources that were previously
unavailable to them. This led to improved economic opportunities and
stability.
2. Skill Development:
o Members acquired skills in financial management, leadership, and teamwork,
contributing to their personal and professional growth.
3. Community Solidarity:
o The SHGs fostered a sense of community and mutual support, with members
helping each other beyond financial transactions.
4. Economic Improvement:
o The availability of loans and financial education led to enhanced income-
generating activities and overall economic improvement within the town.

Challenges:

1. Resistance to Change:
o Some residents were initially reluctant to join the SHGs due to skepticism
about the system's efficacy.
2. Management Issues:

21
 o Ensuring consistent participation and adherence to group rules required
ongoing effort and support from Hope for All.
3. Sustainability Concerns:
o The long-term sustainability of the SHGs depended on continued member
engagement and effective management practices.

Questions:

1. What are the primary benefits of Self-Help Groups (SHGs) as demonstrated in

the caselet?
2. How did the introduction of SHGs impact the economic stability of the
Shanthinagar residents?
3. What were some of the challenges faced by the SHGs in Shanthinagar, and how
might they be addressed?
4. How did the training provided by Hope for All contribute to the success of the
SHGs?
5. In what ways did the SHGs foster community solidarity in Shanthinagar?
6. What role did leadership play in the management and effectiveness of the SHGs?
7. How can the concept of SHGs be adapted for other communities facing similar
financial challenges?
8. What strategies could be implemented to overcome resistance to SHGs in new
areas?

Question Bank

1. What is Self Help Group? Describe the role and functions of SHG.
2. Describe the role & functions of Community Based Organizations.
3. Describe the major source of rural finance in India.
4. Critically evaluate the Bureaucratic Organizational Structure.
5. Discuss the History of Panchayati Raj Institution from Pre-independence till date.
6. Explain the three tiers of Panchayati Raj Institutions with reference to their
composition and functions.
7. Explain the role of NABARD in Rural Financing for Rural Development.

22