OB III Unit Material
OB III Unit Material
Group dynamics refers to the attitudinal and behavioral characteristics of a group. It involves the
interactions and processes that occur between members of a group, as well as the relationships that
develop within a group. Understanding group dynamics is crucial for organizations because it affects
how individuals behave and perform when working together. Groups are often categorized into
formal and informal groups, each with its own distinct characteristics and functions.
Formal Groups
Formal groups are created deliberately by organizations to accomplish specific objectives. These
groups are often hierarchical, with defined roles, responsibilities, and relationships. They follow an
organizational structure and exist to achieve the organization's goals.
Defined Structure: Formal groups have a structured hierarchy, with clear roles, rules, and
regulations that govern how group members interact.
Leadership: A designated leader is often appointed to oversee the group’s functioning and
ensure the completion of objectives.
Stability: Formal groups tend to be stable and may continue to exist until the objective is
completed or the organization decides to disband them.
Membership: Members are selected or appointed by the organization based on their skills,
qualifications, or experience.
Accountability: Group members are held accountable to the organization and their
performance is often evaluated in relation to the group's objectives.
Committees: Groups formed to address particular issues like safety, budget planning, or
event management.
Command Group: This consists of a manager and the employees who report directly to
them, forming a part of the formal organizational hierarchy.
Task Group: Task groups are formed to complete a particular job or solve a specific problem.
These may be temporary and disbanded once the task is finished.
Coordination: Formal groups help to coordinate activities across different parts of the
organization to ensure smooth operations.
Informal Groups
Informal groups emerge naturally within an organization based on personal relationships, shared
interests, or social needs. They are not officially designated by the organization and are often formed
spontaneously.
Purpose: Informal groups form based on personal relationships, common interests, or social
needs, not necessarily to achieve organizational goals.
Flexible Structure: Unlike formal groups, informal groups lack a rigid structure. Roles and
leadership may change over time depending on the group dynamics.
Leadership: Leadership in informal groups often arises naturally. The leader is usually
someone who commands respect and has influence, but without formal authority.
Fluid Membership: Informal group membership is not fixed. Members can join or leave the
group as they see fit.
Unwritten Rules: These groups follow unwritten norms and social rules rather than formal
policies.
Friendship Groups: Colleagues who bond over common interests like sports, hobbies, or
shared backgrounds.
Support Groups: Employees who come together to help each other cope with stress, work
challenges, or personal issues.
Interest Groups: Groups formed around shared interests, such as a lunchtime yoga group or
a book club within the workplace.
Interest Groups: Formed by employees who share common interests and may come
together to discuss or pursue these interests, such as sports teams or hobby groups.
Friendship Groups: These are created when individuals associate with each other because of
personal friendships, often meeting outside of work.
Reference Groups: Groups that people identify with and use as a standard for comparing
themselves.
Functions of Informal Groups:
Social Support: Provide emotional and psychological support to members, making the
workplace more enjoyable.
Norm Enforcement: Informal groups enforce social norms and influence behavior through
peer pressure and acceptance.
Norms Governed by formal rules and policies Unwritten norms, peer expectations
Group dynamics in both formal and informal groups can have a profound impact on organizational
performance, employee satisfaction, and workplace culture.
Social Cohesion: Informal groups promote social cohesion, which can improve morale and
reduce turnover.
Groupthink: In tightly-knit groups, members may conform to the majority opinion, leading to
poor decision-making.
Cliques and Exclusion: Informal groups can sometimes lead to the formation of cliques,
which may alienate others or create divisions within the organization.
Resistance to Change: Strong informal groups may resist organizational changes that
threaten their established norms or routines.
Conflict: Poor group dynamics, whether in formal or informal groups, can lead to
interpersonal conflict, miscommunication, or power struggles.
Understanding and managing group dynamics is crucial for maintaining a healthy organizational
culture. Here are some strategies:
Recognizing Informal Groups: Managers should recognize the role informal groups play in
the workplace and leverage their influence positively.
Team Building Activities: Regular team-building exercises can improve trust and
relationships within and across both formal and informal groups.
Balancing Formal and Informal Leadership: While formal leaders are important for task
accomplishment, informal leaders can play a key role in shaping group culture and morale.
Group norms are the unspoken, unwritten rules that influence the behavior of group members. They
arise naturally as members interact and establish patterns of behavior that are acceptable or
preferred by the group. These norms can vary widely depending on the group’s purpose, size, and
the culture in which it operates.
Unwritten Rules: Norms are not formalized like company policies; instead, they are
understood and followed by group members.
Accepted by the Majority: For norms to function, they must be accepted by most, if not all,
members of the group.
Dynamic: Group norms can change over time as the group evolves or as external
circumstances shift.
Influence Behavior: Norms shape how group members act, speak, and interact with each
other, ensuring some degree of uniformity.
There are different types of norms that regulate various aspects of group behavior:
1. Performance Norms
Performance norms dictate how hard members should work and what the quality of their work
should be. These norms set expectations regarding productivity, deadlines, and attention to detail.
Example: In a project team, the norm may be to submit deliverables two days before the
official deadline to allow for review.
2. Appearance Norms
These norms govern aspects of appearance, such as dress codes, grooming, and physical
presentation, which can be especially important in professional settings.
Example: In a corporate office, there may be an expectation that employees wear formal
business attire during the workweek.
3. Social Norms
Social norms dictate how group members interact with each other, defining what behaviors are
considered polite or respectful. They cover social interactions, such as how to greet others, how to
give feedback, and how to manage conflicts.
4. Communication Norms
These norms determine how group members share information, how often they communicate, and
the tone of their communication. They are especially important in maintaining effective teamwork
and collaboration.
Example: In a collaborative team, there may be a norm to always cc relevant team members
in emails regarding the project.
5. Decision-Making Norms
Decision-making norms guide how decisions are made within the group, including whether decisions
are made collectively or by a leader, and the process for reaching a consensus.
Example: A team might have a norm that decisions are made through majority voting after a
discussion.
7. Conformity Norms
Conformity norms define the degree to which group members are expected to adhere to group
values, attitudes, and behavior. These norms ensure uniformity and reduce deviation from
established practices.
Group norms play several key roles in organizations and teams, impacting both group cohesion and
overall performance:
Norms give group members a sense of predictability by establishing clear guidelines for behavior.
This reduces ambiguity and uncertainty, allowing members to focus on their tasks without worrying
about stepping out of line.
When members adhere to the same norms, it fosters a sense of unity and belonging within the
group. Group members feel that they are part of a team that shares similar values and goals, which
enhances collaboration.
3. Promote Efficiency
Norms streamline group processes by establishing standard ways of working. For example,
communication norms ensure that information is shared efficiently, while performance norms help
keep everyone on track with deadlines.
4. Enhance Decision-Making
Decision-making norms ensure that group decisions are made in a systematic and inclusive way. This
prevents chaos and ensures that all members’ voices are heard, leading to better and more balanced
outcomes.
5. Conflict Prevention
By setting clear expectations for behavior, group norms help prevent conflicts that might arise from
misunderstandings or divergent practices. Social and communication norms, in particular, can reduce
the potential for interpersonal conflict.
Managers and leaders play a crucial role in managing group norms, especially in formal groups where
norms directly impact performance and productivity. Here are some strategies for managing group
norms:
1. Setting Clear Expectations
Managers should establish clear performance and communication norms from the outset. For
example, setting expectations for meeting attendance, deadlines, and communication protocols can
help create a productive work environment.
Leaders need to model the behavior they want to see in their teams. If a leader consistently
demonstrates respect, collaboration, and professionalism, these behaviors are likely to become
group norms.
Positive group norms should be reinforced through recognition and rewards. For example, rewarding
a team for meeting deadlines consistently reinforces the norm of timely work.
If a group has developed negative norms (such as poor communication or lack of accountability),
managers need to address these issues directly. This might involve resetting expectations, providing
feedback, or implementing new group processes.
Regular check-ins with group members can help ensure that norms are understood and followed.
Encouraging open communication allows members to discuss concerns about existing norms or
propose changes.
Group cohesiveness is the "glue" that holds a group together. It reflects the emotional attachment
that members feel toward the group and toward each other, as well as their commitment to
achieving shared goals. A cohesive group is marked by unity, trust, and a sense of belonging.
Shared Identity: The group has a clear, shared sense of purpose or identity.
1. Task Cohesion: The degree to which members are united in achieving the group's objectives.
2. Social Cohesion: The degree to which members of a group like each other and enjoy
spending time together socially.
Several factors contribute to the cohesiveness of a group. These include both internal dynamics
within the group and external forces from the environment.
1. Group Size
Smaller groups tend to be more cohesive than larger groups. In smaller groups, members can interact
more closely and form stronger relationships. Larger groups may struggle to maintain high levels of
cohesion because of difficulties in coordinating and maintaining personal connections.
Example: A team of 5-7 people working on a project may be more cohesive than a
department of 30 individuals, simply because members can interact more frequently and
more deeply.
Groups whose members share similar backgrounds, values, or interests are more likely to be
cohesive. When members perceive themselves as being alike, they are more likely to bond and
cooperate.
Strong, shared group norms and values contribute to cohesiveness by creating a sense of common
identity. When group members agree on what behaviors are acceptable and what goals are worth
pursuing, they are more likely to collaborate effectively.
Example: A group that values hard work, punctuality, and teamwork will likely have higher
cohesion as all members strive to meet these expectations.
4. Frequency of Interaction
The more often group members interact, the more likely they are to develop strong bonds. Frequent
communication allows members to build trust, resolve conflicts, and share ideas, which increases
cohesion.
Example: Teams that meet daily or weekly to discuss projects or progress are more likely to
become cohesive than those that interact only occasionally.
Groups with clear, shared goals tend to be more cohesive. When all members are working toward
the same outcome, they are more likely to support and motivate each other.
Example: A sports team with the shared goal of winning a championship will often display
high levels of cohesiveness.
Success breeds cohesion. Groups that achieve their goals tend to become more cohesive, as success
reinforces the value of working together. On the other hand, repeated failures can reduce
cohesiveness by undermining trust and motivation.
Example: A sales team that consistently meets or exceeds targets is likely to feel more united
than a team that repeatedly falls short.
7. External Threats
Cohesiveness can increase when a group faces external challenges or competition. The presence of a
common "enemy" or a shared threat can bond members as they work together to overcome it.
Example: In times of crisis, such as a competitive market or a company facing financial
difficulties, employees may band together to protect the organization, increasing
cohesiveness.
8. Leadership
Strong, effective leadership plays a crucial role in fostering group cohesiveness. A leader who
encourages collaboration, respect, and open communication helps to create an environment where
group members feel valued and motivated to contribute to the group's success.
Example: A manager who recognizes individual efforts, resolves conflicts, and sets clear goals
is more likely to lead a cohesive team.
Cohesive groups bring many benefits to an organization. These advantages include both task-related
benefits (improved performance) and social benefits (increased satisfaction).
1. Higher Productivity
Cohesive groups tend to be more productive because members are motivated to work together
effectively. They support one another, collaborate on tasks, and share responsibilities, leading to
more efficient work processes.
Example: A highly cohesive project team will divide tasks effectively, help each other when
needed, and stay motivated to meet deadlines.
2. Improved Communication
Members of cohesive groups communicate more openly and frequently. This facilitates the sharing of
ideas, quick problem-solving, and smoother coordination of tasks.
Example: In a cohesive marketing team, members may be more willing to share creative
ideas and provide constructive feedback to one another.
3. Enhanced Problem-Solving
Because cohesive groups have strong interpersonal bonds, they are better able to work through
conflicts and solve problems together. Members trust each other’s expertise and are more likely to
engage in constructive discussions when faced with challenges.
Example: A cohesive engineering team may have an easier time brainstorming solutions to
technical problems because members feel comfortable voicing their opinions.
Group members who feel a strong sense of belonging and connection to their peers are more
satisfied with their group membership. This satisfaction can lead to higher morale and job
satisfaction, which reduces turnover and absenteeism.
Example: Employees who feel part of a close-knit team are more likely to report higher job
satisfaction and remain with the company longer.
Example: A cohesive research team will likely work long hours and push through challenges
to complete a groundbreaking project.
Group cohesiveness leads to a higher level of job satisfaction, which reduces absenteeism and
turnover rates. When members feel connected to the group, they are less likely to seek opportunities
elsewhere.
To foster and maintain group cohesiveness, leaders and group members can implement several
strategies:
Establishing clear, shared goals helps align group members’ efforts and fosters a sense of unity. Goals
provide a common purpose that members can rally around, reinforcing task cohesion.
Open and honest communication is critical for building trust and maintaining strong relationships
within the group. Regular meetings, feedback sessions, and opportunities for discussion help
members feel heard and valued.
While task cohesion is essential, social interaction is also crucial for building interpersonal bonds.
Team-building activities, social events, and informal gatherings can help members develop a sense of
camaraderie.
Acknowledging the contributions of group members reinforces positive behavior and shows that
their efforts are valued. Recognition can take the form of praise, awards, or even informal gestures of
appreciation.
When leadership is distributed among group members, everyone has a chance to contribute, which
increases engagement and cohesion. Shared leadership fosters a sense of ownership and
responsibility for the group’s success.
Group decision-making is the process by which a group of people comes together to make a decision,
rather than having one individual make the choice. The decision-making process in groups can take
various forms, depending on the group structure, the importance of the decision, and the available
time.
Shared Responsibility: The outcome of the decision is accepted and supported by all
members.
There are several methods by which groups can make decisions, each with its advantages and
disadvantages. The most common types of group decision-making methods include:
1. Consensus Decision-Making
In consensus decision-making, the group works toward a decision that is acceptable to all members,
even if it is not everyone’s preferred choice. This method emphasizes collaboration and ensures that
every member’s voice is heard.
Advantages: Promotes unity, encourages participation, and results in decisions that everyone
supports.
2. Majority Rule
In majority rule, group members vote on various options, and the option with the most votes is
chosen. This is one of the most common and straightforward decision-making methods.
Advantages: Simple, efficient, and democratic; can be used when a quick decision is needed.
Disadvantages: The minority opinion may feel marginalized, and important concerns might
be overlooked.
3. Unanimous Decision-Making
In unanimous decision-making, all group members must fully agree on the chosen decision. If any
member disagrees, the group must continue discussions until everyone is on the same page.
4. Delphi Technique
The Delphi technique involves collecting input from group members anonymously. Each member
provides feedback or answers to a questionnaire, and the responses are shared among the group.
Members then revise their answers based on the feedback until the group reaches a consensus.
Disadvantages: Time-consuming due to the iterative process and the need for multiple
rounds of feedback.
5. Nominal Group Technique
The nominal group technique involves group members brainstorming ideas individually before
coming together to discuss and vote on the best option. This technique allows for independent
thinking and reduces the risk of groupthink.
Advantages: Promotes independent ideas, reduces the influence of strong personalities, and
balances participation.
6. Brainstorming
Brainstorming is a creative group decision-making process where members generate ideas freely
without judgment. The goal is to produce as many ideas as possible before evaluating or criticizing
them.
Advantages: Encourages creativity, fosters a relaxed atmosphere, and generates a wide range
of ideas.
Disadvantages: Can result in too many ideas to manage effectively, and the quality of ideas
can vary.
The group decision-making process can be broken down into several key steps. While different
methods might have unique procedures, these general steps apply to most group decision-making
scenarios:
The first step is to clearly define the problem the group is trying to solve or the decision they need to
make. This step sets the stage for the entire process and ensures that all members are focused on
the same goal.
2. Gather Information
Once the problem is defined, the group collects all relevant information needed to make an informed
decision. This may include data, research, expert opinions, and other resources.
3. Identify Alternatives
The group generates possible solutions or alternatives. Depending on the decision-making method,
this step may involve brainstorming, individual input, or a more structured approach like the nominal
group technique.
Each potential solution is assessed based on its pros and cons, feasibility, and alignment with the
group's goals. Members discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each option, considering various
perspectives and possible outcomes.
After evaluating the alternatives, the group chooses the best solution. The method used to make the
decision (consensus, majority rule, etc.) will determine how the final choice is made.
6. Implement the Decision
Once the decision is made, the group moves forward with implementation. This step involves
creating a plan for putting the decision into action and assigning responsibilities.
After the decision has been implemented, the group evaluates its success. This step allows the group
to learn from the process and make adjustments if necessary.
Several factors can affect the effectiveness and outcome of group decision-making. These factors
include group dynamics, leadership, external pressures, and the complexity of the decision.
1. Group Size
The size of the group plays a significant role in decision-making. Smaller groups tend to make
decisions faster, but they may lack diverse perspectives. Larger groups benefit from a wider range of
ideas but may face challenges like coordination difficulties and conflicts.
Example: A group of five people might quickly reach a decision, whereas a group of 20 may
struggle with communication and differing opinions.
Groups with diverse members in terms of background, experience, and expertise can bring fresh
perspectives to decision-making. However, diversity can also lead to conflicts if members have
difficulty reconciling different viewpoints.
Example: A cross-functional team might come up with innovative solutions because of the
varied expertise of its members.
3. Leadership
A strong leader can guide the group through the decision-making process, keep discussions focused,
and ensure that all members participate. However, poor leadership can result in group domination
by a few members or decisions that reflect the leader’s preferences rather than the group’s collective
wisdom.
Example: A skilled facilitator can ensure that quieter members contribute their ideas and
prevent dominant personalities from controlling the discussion.
4. Group Cohesiveness
Highly cohesive groups tend to work well together and reach decisions more quickly because
members trust each other and are motivated to collaborate. However, excessive cohesiveness can
lead to groupthink, where members prioritize harmony over critical analysis.
Example: A cohesive team might easily reach a consensus, but the decision may lack
thorough evaluation if dissenting opinions are not expressed.
5. Time Pressure
Groups under time constraints may rush through the decision-making process, potentially leading to
poor decisions. When time is limited, groups might settle for the most obvious solution without fully
exploring alternatives.
Example: A team facing a tight deadline might choose the first workable solution rather than
spending time considering more creative or innovative options.
6. Conflict
While some conflict can be healthy and stimulate creative thinking, excessive or unresolved conflict
can hinder decision-making. If group members are unable to find common ground, the decision-
making process can become stalled.
Example: In a group where members have strong, opposing opinions, the decision-making
process might be delayed as they try to resolve their differences.
Group decision-making has several advantages, but it also comes with challenges. Understanding the
strengths and weaknesses of this process helps organizations choose when to use group decision-
making effectively.
Advantages
1. Diverse Perspectives: Group decision-making benefits from multiple viewpoints, which can
lead to more informed and creative decisions.
2. Greater Acceptance: Decisions made by a group are more likely to be accepted and
supported by all members, leading to smoother implementation.
4. Shared Responsibility: When a group makes a decision, the responsibility is shared, reducing
individual pressure and spreading accountability.
Disadvantages
2. Potential for Groupthink: Strong cohesion can lead to groupthink, where members avoid
dissenting opinions and make poor decisions.
3. Dominance by Strong Personalities: In some cases, a few individuals may dominate the
discussion, preventing others from contributing or influencing the outcome
disproportionately.
4. Conflicts: Differing opinions and personalities can lead to conflicts, which may delay or
hinder the decision-making process.
What is Negotiation?
Negotiation is a dialogue between parties aimed at resolving differences and reaching an agreement.
It typically involves bargaining over interests, terms, or outcomes. Negotiations can take place in
various settings, such as business transactions, legal disputes, diplomatic discussions, and personal
relationships.
Two or more parties: Negotiation requires at least two parties with distinct interests.
Desire for agreement: Despite the conflict, there is a willingness to resolve the issue through
discussion.
Mutual benefit: The goal is to find a solution that benefits all parties, though not always
equally.
Phases of Negotiation
Negotiation typically unfolds in several stages. Understanding these stages helps negotiators
approach the process strategically and increases the likelihood of a successful outcome.
1. Preparation
The preparation phase is critical for effective negotiation. During this stage, parties gather
information, set clear objectives, and develop a strategy. Preparation includes understanding the
other party’s interests, defining the desired outcome, and determining the boundaries or limits of
what is acceptable.
2. Opening
The opening phase is when the parties first present their positions. It’s important to establish a
positive tone and create an atmosphere of collaboration, especially in integrative negotiations. The
initial offer or position can significantly influence the direction of the negotiation.
3. Bargaining
This is the heart of the negotiation process, where the parties exchange offers and counteroffers. The
goal is to find a middle ground that satisfies both sides. Bargaining requires flexibility, creative
problem-solving, and a clear understanding of the priorities of both parties.
o Use active listening and ask questions to clarify the other party’s position.
4. Closing
Once an agreement is reached, the closing phase involves finalizing the details and ensuring that
both parties are clear on the terms of the agreement. This may include drafting formal agreements,
confirming verbal commitments, or arranging follow-up actions.
5. Implementation
In the implementation phase, the agreed-upon terms are put into action. Successful implementation
requires clear communication, follow-through, and ongoing collaboration between the parties
involved.
o Monitor progress to ensure that the terms of the agreement are being fulfilled.
Effective negotiation requires a combination of hard and soft skills. Developing these skills can
significantly enhance your ability to negotiate successfully in various contexts.
1. Active Listening
Active listening involves fully focusing on the speaker, understanding their message, and responding
thoughtfully. In negotiations, it helps build rapport, uncover hidden interests, and prevent
misunderstandings.
How to Improve: Practice reflective listening by paraphrasing what the other party has said
to ensure understanding.
2. Emotional Intelligence
Emotional intelligence (EQ) refers to the ability to recognize, understand, and manage your own
emotions, as well as the emotions of others. High EQ helps negotiators stay calm, build trust, and
handle conflicts effectively.
How to Improve: Develop self-awareness, practice empathy, and learn to regulate your
emotions in stressful situations.
3. Effective Communication
Clear and concise communication is crucial in negotiations. This includes both verbal and nonverbal
communication, such as body language, tone of voice, and facial expressions. Miscommunication can
lead to misunderstandings and conflicts.
How to Improve: Focus on being clear, assertive, and respectful in your communication.
Avoid jargon and ensure that your message is easily understood.
4. Problem-Solving
In integrative negotiations, problem-solving skills are essential for finding creative solutions that
satisfy both parties. This requires analyzing the situation, identifying the root causes of the conflict,
and proposing solutions that meet both parties’ needs.
How to Improve: Practice brainstorming, think outside the box, and look for win-win
scenarios.
5. Persuasion
Persuasion involves influencing the other party to see things from your perspective or agree to your
terms. Strong persuasion skills can help you build a compelling case for your position and move the
negotiation toward a favorable outcome.
How to Improve: Focus on building credibility, using logical arguments, and appealing to the
other party’s interests and values.
6. Patience
Negotiation is often a slow process, and rushing it can lead to poor outcomes. Patience allows you to
take the time needed to thoroughly explore options and reach the best possible agreement.
7. Strategic Thinking
Strategic thinking involves planning your approach to the negotiation, anticipating the other party’s
moves, and adapting to changing circumstances. This skill helps you stay one step ahead and make
informed decisions.
How to Improve: Continuously analyze the situation, remain flexible, and consider the long-
term implications of your decisions.
1. Anchoring
Anchoring is the practice of making an initial offer that sets the reference point for the negotiation.
The first number put on the table can influence the rest of the negotiation, even if it’s unrealistic.
Example: In a salary negotiation, an employer offers a low salary initially to anchor the
negotiation around that number.
BATNA is the best outcome you can achieve if the negotiation fails. Knowing your BATNA gives you
leverage in negotiations because it allows you to walk away if the terms are not favorable.
Example: A job candidate knows that they have another job offer in hand, which strengthens
their position in salary negotiations.
3. Concessions
Concessions involve giving up something of value to the other party in exchange for something you
want. Skilled negotiators make concessions strategically to build goodwill and move the negotiation
forward.
Example: A buyer agrees to pay a higher price if the seller includes additional services.
4. Silence
Using silence effectively can pressure the other party into revealing more information or making
concessions. When used at key moments, silence can create discomfort and prompt the other party
to fill the gap by speaking or making an offer.
Example: After making an offer, remaining silent can force the other party to respond or
make a counteroffer.
Conclusion
Negotiation is a complex process that involves careful planning, effective communication, and
strategic thinking. By mastering key negotiation skills and understanding the different types of
negotiation, phases, and tactics, you can improve your ability to negotiate successfully in both
personal and professional settings. Whether you’re aiming for a win-win solution or trying to
maximize your gain, the ability to negotiate effectively is an invaluable asset in today’s world.