2
2
Individuals have goals to be achieved throughout their life and require an understanding of financial management
to achieve their financial goals. Financial literacy research has increased nowadays, but the results of previous
researches have shown an inadequate level of personal financial knowledge among students. This research is
conducted with the purpose of illustrating the description of financial knowledge, financial attitude, and financial
behavior of college student in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. The research makes use of primary data obtained
from the distribution of questionnaires on associated variables. This research also analyzes the effect of financial
knowledge on financial attitude and its impact on financial behavior. Structural Equation Modeling is used in
order to determine the causal relationship between related variables. The result of this research shows that
descriptively the college students have financial knowledge understanding. They have an agreement with respect
IP: 193.203.10.108 On: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:00:04
to power-prestige, retention planning, anxiety, and achievement-esteem, and also making plans how to reach
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
the financial goals. The results also indicate the effect of financial knowledge on financial attitude and its impact
on financial behavior.
Delivered by Ingenta
8762 Adv. Sci. Lett. Vol. 23, No. 9, 2017 1936-6612/2017/23/8762/004 doi:10.1166/asl.2017.9966
Adv. Sci. Lett. 23, 8762–8765, 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE
8763
RESEARCH ARTICLE Adv. Sci. Lett. 23, 8762–8765, 2017
for determining sample size in multivariate research which the Table II. Financial knowledge measurement.
sample size should be several times (preferably 10 times or more) Corrected item-total
as large as a total number of variables in the study, even though No Item correlation Mean
a sample size larger than 30 and less than 500 is appropriate for
VAR00001 Know about interest rate, .821 4.5698
most research.18 finance charges, and
The research variables are Financial Knowledge, Financial credit terms
Attitude, and Financial Behavior of college students. To mea- VAR00002 Know about credit ratings .902 4.6609
sure the operationally defined elements of the variables, numer- VAR00003 Know about managing .829 5.0446
finance
ical scale, with a 7-point scale which is an interval scale, VAR00004 Know about invest money .869 5.2326
was used. Financial knowledge measurement in this study is VAR00005 Know about the balance .897 4.9147
a person’s self-assessment about financial matter knowledge, on bank statement
as mentioned previously in the literature review. Financial atti-
tude measurement included four dimensions: retention planning,
power prestige, anxiety, and achievement-esteem, while financial Table III. Financial attitude measurement.
behavior was measured by five questions of general management Corrected item-total
practices. No Item correlation Mean
The obtained data were tested for their validity and reliability VAR00006 Power prestige .897 5.2519
beforehand to make sure that all items are valid and reliable. VAR00007 Retention planning .888 5.1686
The data were organized and analyzed descriptively to give a VAR00008 Anxiety .841 5.1337
detailed picture about financial knowledge, attitude, and behavior VAR00009 Achievement-esteem .847 4.8159
of college students. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through
LISREL was used to test the research model in this study in order
to determine the causal relationship between related variables. Table IV. Financial behavior measurement.
Corrected item-total
No Item correlation Mean
4. RESULTS VAR000010Creating financial goals .915 4.4477
Based on data collection conducted by questionnaires distribu- VAR000011Making plans on how to .910 4.5814
tion among college students, a total of 516 fully-filled question- reach the financial goals
naire data pertaining Financial Knowledge, Financial Attitude, VAR000012 Setting specific financial .929 4.5252
goals for the future
and Financial Behavior was obtained.IP: 193.203.10.108 On: Fri,VAR000013
17 Apr 2020 15:00:04
Knowing roughly how .903 5.2151
The results show that the alpha values Copyright:
of the three constructs
American Scientific Publishers
much money needed
used in this study exceeded the minimum requirement Delivered
for a reli- byVAR000014
Ingenta Discussing financial goals .922 5.2500
ability of 0.70, as they are greater than 0.9. The results of the with spouses
reliability test show that measurement items were highly reliable
in measuring each construct. Table I shows Cronbach’s alpha
The questionnaire concerning Financial Attitude, which
reliability estimates for each of all constructs.
includes items associated with retention planning, power-
The result also shows that each indicator of all three constructs
prestige, anxiety, and achievement-esteem, yields results that
had corrected item-total correlation values relatively high which
range in between 4.8159 to 5.2519 on a 1–7 scale. The relatively
are more than 0.8 (see Tables II–IV). This shows that all the
above average scale values of Financial Attitude shows agree-
indicators were valid to measure all the constructs.
ment in respect to retention planning, power-prestige, anxiety,
The description of Financial Knowledge, Financial Attitude,
and achievement-esteem.
and Financial Behavior of college students is conducted by orga-
The questionnaire result for the items associated with stu-
nizing the data based on the assessment of each item in the
dents’ Financial Behavior ranges in between 4.4477 to 5.2500.
questionnaire (see Tables II–IV). The questionnaire result indi-
This shows that students consider creating financial goals, mak-
cates that the average respondents’ answer (for items representing
ing plans on how to reach the financial goals, and setting specific
Financial Knowledge which consists of their knowledge about
financial goals for the future. They also know roughly how much
interest rate, finance charges, and credit terms; credit ratings;
money needed and tend to discuss financial goals with spouses.
managing finance; investing money; the balance on their bank
The Structural Equation Modeling specifies the causal rela-
statement) ranges in between 4.5698 to 5.2326 on a 1–7 numer-
tionships among constructs. The goodness of fit indices (GFI) =
ical scale. It means the students have relatively above average
0.87, Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.94, and Comparative Fit Index
understanding of financial knowledge. In this case, students have
(CFI) = 0.94. The assessment of the results of the coefficients
more understanding in how to manage finance and to invest
indicates that financial knowledge significantly affects the finan-
money than the other three indicators.
cial attitude of college students, with p = 0.036 (<0.05), b =
0.98, and R2 = 0.97. This result suggests that individual’s under-
Table I. Cronbach’s alpha reliability estimates. standing of the financial concepts will determine his or her sub-
jective tendencies in evaluating the financial problems.
No. Construct Cronbach’s alpha
The results also show that financial attitude significantly
1 Financial Knowledge 0.950 affects financial behavior of college students, with p = 0.030
2 Financial Attitude 0.943
3 Financial Behavior 0.969
(<0.05), b = 0.91, and R2 = 0.83. This result suggests that indi-
vidual who has tendencies to evaluate favorable aspects of the
8764
Adv. Sci. Lett. 23, 8762–8765, 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE
financial problems will take action and has a style of handling therefore would affect the results of the study. Future study may
financial issues which are favorable. IP: 193.203.10.108 On: Fri,consider
17 Aprstudents who have taken this subject.
2020 15:00:04
The results of hypothesis testing show that the both hypotheses This study also
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers focused on financial knowledge as an inde-
are proved. Figure 2 shows the structural model. Delivered bypendent
Ingenta variable, and financial attitude as an intervening variable
which affects financial behavior. Future study may consider other
independent or intervening variables.
5. CONCLUSION
The descriptive analysis shows that the college students have rel-
atively above average understanding of financial knowledge, and References and Notes
average scale values of Financial Attitude shows students’ agree- 1. M. E. Ibrahim and F. R. Alqaydi, International Journal of Economics and
Finance 5, 126 (2013).
ment in respect to retention planning, power-prestige, anxiety, 2. http://www.ojk.go.id (2013).
and achievement-esteem. The analysis also shows that college 3. D. Hearth, D. L. Kurtz, and L. E. Boone, Thomson, South Western (2006).
students consider having plans for the future regarding financial 4. R. Anthony and M. F. Sabri, International Review of Management and Busi-
ness Research 4, 1105 (2015).
goals. 5. J. L. Gitman and M. D. Joehnk, Thomson, South Western (2005).
The hypotheses regarding the relationship between financial 6. J. B. R. Bir and Subarna, Economic Literature XII, 69 (2014).
behavior, financial knowledge, financial attitude, are developed 7. G. K. Shapiro and B. J. Burchell, Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and
Economics 1 (2012).
and tested. The results of this research confirm that financial 8. T. Y. Shih and S. C. Ke, Serv. Bus 8, 217 (2014).
knowledge positively affects the financial attitude of college stu- 9. M. Samy, H. Tawfik, R. Huang, and A. K. Nagar, International Journal of Eco-
dents. The results also show that financial attitude positively nomic Sciences and Applied Research 1, 55 (2008).
10. D. L. Remund, The Journal of Consumer Affairs 44, 276 (2010).
affects the financial behavior of college students. The structural
11. C. A. Robb and D. L. Sharpe, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning
equation modeling specifies the causal relationships among these 20, 25 (2009).
constructs and the results show the acceptable range for a good 12. V. Perry and M. D. Morris, The Journal of Consumer Affairs 39, 299 (2005).
model fit. 13. N. T. N. Mien and T. P. Thao, Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Global
Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences (2015).
14. A. Rajna and W. P. S. Ezat, International Journal of Business and Manage-
ment 6, 105 (2011).
6. LIMITATION AND FUTURE STUDY 15. F. Pattarin and S. Cosma, Review of Behavioral Finance 4, 113 (2012).
16. L. M. Borden, S. A. Lee, J. Serido, and D. Collins, J. Fam. Econ. 29, 23 (2008).
This research does not take into consideration the respondent
17. L. Falahati and L. H. Paim, Gender in Management: An International Journal
who has taken Personal Financial Planning subject as they might 27, 315 (2012).
have a different financial knowledge, attitude, behavior, and 18. U. Sekaran, 4th edn., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2003).
8765