pti dx
pti dx
pti dx
Contributor Disclosures
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Dec 2024. | This topic last updated: May 30, 2024.
INTRODUCTION
The clinical features and diagnosis of ITP in children will be reviewed here. The
initial treatment of newly diagnosed ITP and management of chronic ITP in children
are discussed separately. (See "Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in children:
Management of newly diagnosed patients" and "Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)
in children: Management of patients with persistent, chronic, or refractory
disease".)
TERMINOLOGY
PATHOGENESIS
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Children with ITP can present at any age, but there is a peak in incidence between
two and five years and a second smaller peak in adolescence. In a prospective
population-based study from the five Nordic countries (Sweden, Finland, Norway,
Denmark, and Iceland) between 1998 and 2000, the annual incidence of ITP was 4.8
per 100,000 children younger than 15 years of age [7]. One-half of the patients
were between one and four years of age, and approximately 80 percent were
younger than eight years of age.
Seasonal fluctuations have been reported, with a peak incidence of ITP occurring in
the spring and early summer in temperate climates [7,9]. This observation supports
the notion that viral triggers are an important cause of ITP; however, the finding
has not always been consistent. An association with allergic diseases (eg, allergic
rhinitis and atopic dermatitis) has also been reported [10].
CLINICAL FEATURES
ITP typically presents with the sudden appearance of a petechial rash ( picture 1),
bruising, and/or bleeding in an otherwise healthy child ( table 1).
Thrombocytopenia is occasionally detected incidentally if a complete blood count
(CBC) with platelets is performed for another reason (eg, preoperatively or on a
routine check-up).
There is a very small increased risk of developing ITP in the six weeks following a
measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination. MMR-associated ITP is rare,
occurring in approximately 2.6 cases per 100,000 doses of vaccine. (See "Measles,
mumps, and rubella immunization in infants, children, and adolescents", section on
'Adverse effects'.)
Early childhood vaccines other than MMR do not appear to be associated with
increased risk of ITP [13]. There have been case reports of ITP following
administration of varicella, hepatitis A, pneumococcus, and tetanus-diphtheria-
acellular pertussis vaccines in older children [13]. However, because of the small
number of exposed cases and potential confounding, the association of ITP with
these vaccines has not been confirmed.
The history should explore the following, which are generally absent in children
with ITP at onset of their disease:
● Systemic symptoms (eg, fever, anorexia, bone or joint pain, weight loss,
gastrointestinal [GI] symptoms, headaches).
● Exposure to thrombocytopenia-inducing drugs ( table 2).
● Prior history of bleeding – Occasionally, a child with ITP will have a history of
bruising or bleeding stretching back one to six months, during which it
appears that the ITP was already active.
● Family history of bleeding or autoimmune disease.
If any of these features are present, including mild splenomegaly, other causes of
thrombocytopenia should be carefully considered and appropriate testing pursued.
(See 'Differential diagnosis' below and 'Further evaluation' below.)
Bleeding symptoms — Most patients who present for medical attention have signs
of cutaneous bleeding (eg, petechiae ( picture 1), purpura, ecchymoses, and oral
mucosal bleeding); serious hemorrhage is fortunately very infrequent.
Grading of severity — Bleeding signs and symptoms in children with ITP can
range from none or minimal (eg, several small groups of petechiae or small
bruises) to severe and life-threatening (eg, intracranial hemorrhage or severe GI or
genitourinary bleeding) [14]. The Buchanan and Adix bleeding score is commonly
used to objectively characterize bleeding symptoms in patients with ITP ( table 3).
Other scales include the ITP bleeding scale and the Bleeding Assessment Tool.
Less often, mucosal bleeding may arise from the GI, genitourinary, or vaginal
tracts; this type of bleeding is more serious. Conjunctival or retinal hemorrhages
are infrequently seen [15].
In a large registry study of children with newly diagnosed ITP, the following
bleeding manifestations were reported [15]:
● Cutaneous (petechiae, purpura, or bruising) – 86 percent
● Oral – 19 percent
● Nasal – 20 percent
● No bleeding – 9 percent
● Menstrual, GI, or urinary bleeding – <3 percent
Children presenting with signs and symptoms concerning for ICH (eg, headache,
persistent vomiting, altered mental status, seizures, focal neurologic findings,
recent head trauma) require urgent evaluation (including neuroimaging) and
treatment. The threshold for obtaining neuroimaging in children with ITP is
substantially lower than for the general pediatric population, especially if the
platelet count is <10,000 to 20,000. (See "Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in
children: Management of newly diagnosed patients", section on 'Life-threatening
bleeding'.)
Risk factors for ICH are the same as for severe bleeding in general (ie, very low
platelet count, head trauma, exposure to antiplatelet medications, and signs of
excessive bleeding [eg, wet purpura in the mouth, hematuria, prolonged epistaxis,
GI bleeding, or other pronounced mucosal bleeding]) (see 'Serious hemorrhage'
above). Children who present with these risk factors should be carefully assessed
for signs or symptoms of ICH since the urgency and type of treatment will be
altered by presence of ICH. (See "Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in children:
Management of newly diagnosed patients", section on 'Life-threatening bleeding'.)
Pancytopenia or other abnormalities on the CBC that are not clearly explained
should prompt considerations of other etiologies. (See 'Differential diagnosis'
below.)
● Peripheral blood smear – On examination of the peripheral blood smear, the
white or red blood cells should generally appear normal. Exceptions to this
include patients with postinfectious ITP, in whom activated "atypical"
lymphocytes may be seen ( picture 3). However, distinguishing atypical
lymphocytes from lymphoblasts may be difficult. Patients with iron deficiency
anemia from excessive ITP-related bleeding may have microcytic hypochromic
red cells ( picture 4).
• Early white blood cell forms (eg, blasts) ( picture 5), suggesting leukemia or
lymphoma
In patients with ITP, the bone marrow should be appropriately cellular and the
erythroid and myeloid precursors should be normal in number and
appearance. The megakaryocytes are typically normal or increased in number
and may appear large and/or immature [22].
EVALUATION
Initial evaluation — Initial laboratory testing for patients with suspected ITP
includes the following ( table 4) [23]:
● Complete blood count (CBC), including platelet count, white blood cell
differential, and red blood cell indices
● Examination of the peripheral blood smear
In addition, many experts (including the author of this topic review) often obtain
the following tests at the time of initial presentation:
● Reticulocyte count
● Direct antiglobulin test
● Serum immunoglobulin levels
• Review of the medical record reveals that the patient has had prior low
platelet counts (especially if there has never been a documented normal
platelet count)
• There is a family history of thrombocytopenia or any syndromic features
consistent with an inherited thrombocytopenic syndrome ( table 5A-B)
• Patient fails to respond to ITP treatment (if given) (see "Immune
thrombocytopenia (ITP) in children: Management of patients with persistent,
chronic, or refractory disease", section on 'Ongoing evaluation')
For children with a typical presentation and without any of the above concerns, the
likelihood of finding an alternative diagnosis on bone marrow examination appears
to be low. In a single-center retrospective study of 484 children who underwent
bone marrow aspiration to confirm a provisional diagnosis of ITP, none of those
with typical hematologic features of ITP (ie, normal white blood cell count and
hemoglobin) had evidence of leukemic changes or bone marrow failure, though
one patient was later diagnosed with aplastic anemia [27]. Among children with
nonspecific, "atypical" hematologic findings (n = 152), 7 percent were found to have
a diagnosis other than ITP, divided evenly between leukemia and bone marrow
failure. All of the children who were found to have other diagnoses had clinical
and/or laboratory findings at presentation that were suggestive of an alternative
diagnosis (eg, anemia, leukopenia, leukocytosis).
Similar findings were noted in another retrospective review of 127 children with
presumed ITP in whom bone marrow examination was performed [28]. Only five
patients (3.9 percent) had a diagnosis other than ITP. As in the previous study, all
presented with clinical and/or laboratory findings that were atypical for ITP.
Leukemia was not diagnosed in any patient.
The utility of the IPF in evaluating children with suspected ITP is unclear. Some
experts have suggested that IPF might be useful in cases where the diagnosis of
ITP is uncertain, particularly to help distinguish ITP from bone marrow failure
states, including leukemia and acquired or inherited aplastic anemia. In our
experience, if the diagnosis of ITP is uncertain, bone marrow examination is the
most reliable and established method for excluding a diagnosis of leukemia or
aplastic anemia. However, the IPF may be helpful when used in conjunction with
other tests. (See 'Indications for bone marrow examination' above.)
Several studies have shown that IPF values are elevated in ITP and seem to be
higher than in bone marrow failure states [29-33]. However, whether IPF can
reliably distinguish between ITP and leukemia or bone marrow failure remains
uncertain. Some studies have suggested that IPF has prognostic value since high
IPF appears to be associated with better platelet function and lower bleeding risk
[31,33,34].
Additional clinical studies are needed to determine the role of IPF measurement in
the evaluation of children with ITP.
DIAGNOSIS
For children with a typical presentation of ITP (sudden onset of a petechial rash or
bruising in an otherwise well-appearing child), a presumptive diagnosis of ITP may
be established based upon all of the following criteria ( table 1) [1,4]:
● Platelet count <100,000/microL.
● Otherwise normal complete blood count (CBC) with normal differential white
count, hemoglobin, and reticulocyte count.
● No abnormalities on the peripheral blood smear. In particular, there should be
no evidence of hemolysis or blasts (atypical lymphocytes from viral activation
are acceptable although flow cytometry may be required to distinguish them
from leukemic blasts). (See "Approach to the child with lymphocytosis or
lymphocytopenia", section on 'Blood lymphocyte morphology'.)
● No findings on history and physical examination to suggest another cause of
thrombocytopenia. Children <1 or >10 years old should be scrutinized more
closely for any atypical features. Findings that suggest a diagnosis other than
ITP include:
• The most common initial symptoms of SLE are the gradual onset of fever,
malaise, and general deterioration over several months, with or without a
malar rash; joint stiffness consistent with mild arthritis may be the first sign.
Laboratory findings include the presence of autoantibodies, such as
antinuclear antibodies and antiphospholipid antibodies. (See "Childhood-
onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE): Clinical manifestations and
diagnosis".)
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and
"Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain
language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key
questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for
patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials.
Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and
more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and
are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with
some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage
you to print or email these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient
education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the
keyword[s] of interest.)
● Basics topic (see "Patient education: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) (The
Basics)")