Interview to Tucker Carlson

Vladimir Putin answered questions from Tucker Carlson, a journalist

and founder of Tucker Carlson Network.
February 9, 2024 07:00 The Kremlin, Moscow

Tucker Carlson: Mr. President, thank you.

On February 24, 2022, you addressed your country in your nationwide address when
the conflict in Ukraine started and you said that you were acting because you had come
to the conclusion that the United States through NATO might initiate a quote, “surprise
attack on our country.” And to American ears that sounds paranoid. Tell us why you
believe the United States might strike Russia out of the blue. How did you conclude
that?

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: It's not that the United States was going to launch
a surprise strike on Russia, I didn't say so. Are we having a talk show or a serious
conversation?

Tucker Carlson: That was a good quote. Thank you, it’s formidably serious!

Vladimir Putin: You were initially trained in history, as far as I know?

Tucker Carlson: Yes.

Vladimir Putin: So if you don’t mind I will take only 30 seconds or one minute of your
time to give you a brief historical background.

Tucker Carlson: Please.

Vladimir Putin: Let’s look where our relationship with Ukraine started from. Where
does Ukraine come from?

The Russian state started to exist as a centralized state in 862. This is considered
to be the year of creation of the Russian state because this year the townspeople
of Novgorod (a city in the North-West of the country) invited Rurik, a Varangian prince
from Scandinavia, to reign. In 1862, Russia celebrated the 1000th anniversary of its
statehood, and in Novgorod there is a memorial dedicated to the 1000th anniversary
of the country.

In 882, Rurik's successor Prince Oleg, who was, actually, playing the role of regent
for Rurik’s young son because Rurik had died by that time, came to Kiev. He ousted two
brothers who, apparently, had once been members of Rurik's retinue. So, Russia began
to develop with two centres of power, in Kiev and in Novgorod.

The next, very significant date in the history of Russia, was 988. This was the Baptism
of Russia, when Prince Vladimir, the great-grandson of Rurik, baptized Russia
and adopted Orthodoxy, or Eastern Christianity. From this time the centralized Russian
state began to strengthen. Why? Because of a single territory, integrated economic ties,
one and the same language and, after the Baptism of Russia, the same faith and rule
of the Prince. A centralized Russian state began to take shape.

Back in the Middle Ages, Prince Yaroslav the Wise introduced the order of succession
to the throne, but after he passed away, it became complicated for various reasons.
The throne was passed not directly from father to eldest son, but from the prince who
had passed away to his brother, then to his sons in different lines. All this led
to the fragmentation of Rus as a single state. There was nothing special about it,
the same was happening then in Europe. But the fragmented Russian state became
an easy prey to the empire created earlier by Genghis Khan. His successors, namely,
Batu Khan, came to Rus, plundered and ruined nearly all the cities. The southern part,
including Kiev, by the way, and some other cities, simply lost independence, while
northern cities preserved some of their sovereignty. They had to pay tribute
to the Horde, but they managed to preserve some part of their sovereignty. And then
a unified Russian state began to take shape with its centre in Moscow.

The southern part of the Russian lands, including Kiev, began to gradually gravitate
towards another “magnet” – the centre that was emerging in Europe. This was
the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. It was even called the Lithuanian-Russian Duchy
because Russians were a significant part of its population. They spoke the Old Russian
language and were Orthodox. But then there was a unification, the union of the Grand
Duchy of Lithuania and the Kingdom of Poland. A few years later, another union was
signed, but this time already in the religious sphere. Some of the Orthodox priests
became subordinate to the Pope. Thus, these lands became part of the Polish-
Lithuanian state.

For decades, the Poles were engaged in the “Polonization” of this part
of the population: they introduced their language there, tried to entrench the idea that
this population was not exactly Russians, that because they lived on the fringe (u kraya)
they were “Ukrainians.” Originally, the word ‘Ukrainian’ meant that a person was living
on the outskirts of the state, near the fringe, or was engaged in border service. It didn't
mean any particular ethnic group.

So, the Poles were trying in every possible way to polonize that part of the Russian
lands and actually treated it rather harshly, not to say cruelly. All that led to the fact that
that part of the Russian lands began to struggle for their rights. They wrote letters
to Warsaw demanding that their rights be observed and that people be commissioned
there, including to Kiev…

Tucker Carlson: I beg your pardon, can you tell us what period… I am losing track
of where in history we are.

Vladimir Putin: It was in the 13th century.

Now I will tell what happened next and give the dates so that there is no confusion.

Then in 1654, even a bit earlier, the people who were in control of the authority over
that part of the Russian lands, addressed Warsaw, I repeat, demanding their rights be
observed that they send to them rulers of Russian origin and Orthodox faith. When
Warsaw did not answer them and in fact rejected their demands, they turned
to Moscow so that Moscow took them under its rule.

So that you don't think that I am inventing things… I'll give you these documents…
Tucker Carlson: It doesn’t sound like you are inventing it, but I am not sure why it’s
relevant to what’s happened two years ago.

Vladimir Putin: But still, these are documents from the archives, copies. Here are
letters from Bogdan Khmelnitsky, the man who then controlled the power in that part
of the Russian lands that is now called Ukraine. He wrote to Warsaw demanding that
their rights be upheld, and after being refused, he began to write letters to Moscow
asking to take them under the strong hand of the Moscow Tsar. Here are copies
of these documents. I will leave them for your good memory. There is a translation into
Russian, you can translate it into English later.

Russia did not agree to admit them straight away, assuming that would trigger a war
with Poland. Nevertheless, in 1654, the Zemsky Sobor, which was a representative
body of power of the Old Russian state, made the decision: those Old Russian lands
became part of the Tsardom of Muscovy.

As expected, the war with Poland began. It lasted 13 years, and then a truce was
concluded. In all, after that act of 1654, 32 years later, I think, a peace treaty with
Poland was concluded, “the eternal peace,” as it said. And those lands, the whole left
bank of the Dnieper, including Kiev, reverted to Russia, while the entire right bank
of the Dnieper remained in possession of Poland.

Under the rule of Catherine the Great, Russia reclaimed all of its historical lands,
including in the south and west. This all lasted until the Revolution. Before World War I,
the Austrian General Staff, relying on the ideas of Ukrainianization, started to actively
promote the ideas of Ukraine and the Ukrainianization. Their motive was obvious. Just
before World War I, they wanted to weaken the potential enemy and secure themselves
favourable conditions in the border area. So this idea which had emerged in Poland
that people residing in that territory were allegedly not really Russians, but rather
belonged to a special ethnic group, the Ukrainians, started to be promoted
by the Austrian General Staff too.

As far back as the 19th century, theorists calling for Ukrainian independence appeared.
All those, however, claimed that Ukraine should have a very good relationship with
Russia. They insisted on that. After the 1917 Revolution, the Bolsheviks sought
to restore the statehood, and the Civil War began, including the hostilities with Poland.
In 1921, peace with Poland was proclaimed, and under that treaty, the right bank
of the Dnieper River once again was given back to Poland.

In 1939, after Poland cooperated with Hitler — it did collaborate with Hitler, you
know —Hitler offered Poland peace and a treaty of friendship and alliance (we have all
the relevant documents in the archives), demanding in return that Poland give back
to Germany the so-called Danzig Corridor, which connected the bulk of Germany with
East Prussia and Konigsberg. After World War I this territory was transferred to Poland,
and instead of Danzig, a city of Gdansk emerged. Hitler asked them to give it amicably,
but the Poles refused. Still they collaborated with Hitler and engaged together
in the partitioning of Czechoslovakia.

Tucker Carlson: May I ask… You are making the case that Ukraine, certain parts
of Ukraine, Eastern Ukraine, in fact, has been Russia for hundreds of years. Why
wouldn’t you just take it when you became President 24 years ago? You have nuclear
weapons, they don’t. It’s actually your land. Why did you wait so long?

Vladimir Putin: I’ll tell you. I’m coming to that. This briefing is coming to an end. It might
be boring, but it explains many things.

Tucker Carlson: It’s not boring.

Vladimir Putin: Good. Good. I am so gratified that you appreciate that. Thank you.

So, before World War II, Poland collaborated with Hitler and although it did not yield
to Hitler’s demands, it still participated in the partitioning of Czechoslovakia together
with Hitler. As the Poles had not given the Danzig Corridor to Germany, and went too far,
they pushed Hitler to start World War II by attacking them. Why was it Poland against
whom the war started on September 1, 1939? Poland turned out to be
uncompromising, and Hitler had nothing else to do but start implementing his plans
with Poland.

By the way, the USSR — I have read some archival documents — behaved very
honestly. It asked Poland’s permission to transit its troops through the Polish territory
to help Czechoslovakia. But the then Polish foreign minister said that if the Soviet
planes head to Czechoslovakia, they would be downed over the territory of Poland. But
that doesn’t matter. What matters is that the war began, and Poland fell prey
to the policies it had pursued against Czechoslovakia, as under the well-known
Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, part of that territory, including western Ukraine, was to be
given to Russia. Thus Russia, which was then named the USSR, regained its historical
lands.

After the victory in the Great Patriotic War, as we call World War II, all those territories
were ultimately enshrined as belonging to Russia, to the USSR. As for Poland, it
received, apparently in compensation, the western lands which had originally been
German: the eastern parts of Germany (these are now western lands of Poland).
Of course, Poland regained access to the Baltic sea, and Danzig, which was once again
given its Polish name. So this was how this situation developed.

In 1922, when the USSR was being established, the Bolsheviks started building
the USSR and established the Soviet Ukraine, which had never existed before.

Tucker Carlson: Right.

Vladimir Putin: Stalin insisted that those republics be included in the USSR
as autonomous entities. For some inexplicable reason, Lenin, the founder of the Soviet
state, insisted that they be entitled to withdraw from the USSR. And, again for some
unknown reasons, he transferred to that newly established Soviet Republic of Ukraine
some of the lands together with people living there, even though those lands had never
been called Ukraine; and yet they were made part of that Soviet Republic of Ukraine.
Those lands included the Black Sea region, which was received under Catherine
the Great and which had no historical connection with Ukraine whatsoever.

Even if we go as far back as 1654, when those lands returned to the Russian Empire,
that territory included three or four regions of modern Ukraine, with no Black Sea
region. That was completely out of the question.

Tucker Carlson: In 1654?

Vladimir Putin: Exactly.

Tucker Carlson: You have, I see, encyclopaedic knowledge of that region. But why
didn’t you make this case for the first 22 years as president, that Ukraine wasn’t a real
country?
Vladimir Putin: The Soviet Ukraine was given a great deal of territory that had never
belonged to it, including the Black Sea region. At some point, when Russia received
them as an outcome of the Russo-Turkish wars, they were called “New Russia,”
or Novorossiya. But that does not matter. What matters is that Lenin, the founder
of the Soviet State, established Ukraine that way. For decades, the Ukrainian Soviet
Republic developed as part of the USSR, and for unknown reasons again,
the Bolsheviks were engaged in Ukrainianization. It was not merely because the Soviet
leadership was composed to a great extent of those originating from Ukraine. Rather, it
was explained by the general policy of indigenization pursued by the Soviet Union.
Same things were done in other Soviet republics. This involved promoting national
languages and national cultures, which is not bad in principle. That is how the Soviet
Ukraine was created.

After World War II, Ukraine received, in addition to the lands that had belonged
to Poland before the war, part of the lands that had previously belonged to Hungary
and Romania (known today as Western Ukraine). So Romania and Hungary had some
of their lands taken away and given to the Ukraine and they still remain part of Ukraine.
So in this sense, we have every reason to affirm that Ukraine is an artificial state that
was shaped at Stalin’s will.

Tucker Carlson: Do you believe Hungary has a right to take back its land from Ukraine?
And that other nations have a right to go back to their 1654 borders?

Vladimir Putin: I am not sure whether they should go back to the 1654 borders, but
given Stalin’s time, the so-called Stalin’s regime — which, as many claim, saw
numerous violations of human rights and violations of the rights of other states. In this
sense it is quite possible, of course, to claim back those lands, if we are not talking
about their having the right to do that, it is at least understandable…

Tucker Carlson: Have you told Viktor Orban that he can have a part of Ukraine?

Vladimir Putin: Never. I have never told him that. Not a single time. We have not even
had any conversation on that, but I actually know for sure that Hungarians who live
there wanted to return to their historical homeland.

Moreover, I would like to share a very interesting story with you, I'll digress, it's
a personal one. Somewhere in the early 80's, I went on a road trip in a car from then-
Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) across the Soviet Union through Kiev, made a stop
in Kiev, and then went to Western Ukraine. I went to the town of Beregovo, and all
the names of towns and villages there were in Russian and in a language I didn't
understand – in Hungarian. In Russian and in Hungarian. Not in Ukrainian – in Russian
and in Hungarian.

I was driving through some kind of a village and there were men sitting next
to the houses and they were wearing black three-piece suits and black cylinder hats.
I asked, “Are they some kind of entertainers?” I was told, “No, they're not entertainers.
They're Hungarians.” I said, “What are they doing here?” — “What do you mean? This
is their land, they live here.” This was during the Soviet time, in the 1980’s. They
preserve the Hungarian language, Hungarian names, and all their national costumes.
They are Hungarians and they feel themselves to be Hungarians. And of course, when
now there is an infringement….

Tucker Carlson: And there’s a lot of that though, I think. Many nations feel upset
about — there are Transylvanians as well as you, others, you know — but many nations
feel frustrated by their re-drawn borders after the wars of the 20th century, and wars
going back a thousand years, the ones that you mention, but the fact is that you didn’t
make this case in public until two years ago in February, and in the case that you made,
which I read today, you explain at great length that you thought a physical threat from
the West and NATO, including potentially a nuclear threat, and that’s what got you
to move. Is that a fair characterization of what you said?

Vladimir Putin: I understand that my long speeches probably fall outside of the genre
of an interview. That is why I asked you at the beginning: “Are we going to have
a serious talk or a show?” You said — a serious talk. So bear with me please.

We are coming to the point where the Soviet Ukraine was established. Then, in 1991,
the Soviet Union collapsed. And everything that Russia had generously bestowed
on Ukraine was “dragged away” by the latter.

I’m coming to a very important point of today's agenda. After all, the collapse
of the Soviet Union was effectively initiated by the Russian leadership. I do not
understand what the Russian leadership was guided by at the time, but I suspect there
were several reasons to think everything would be fine.
First, I think that the then Russian leadership believed that the fundamentals
of the relationship between Russia and Ukraine were: in fact, a common language —
more than 90 percent of the population there spoke Russian; family ties — every third
person there had some kind of family or friendship ties; common culture; common
history; finally, common faith; co-existence within a single state for centuries;
and deeply interconnected economies. All of these were so fundamental. All these
elements together make our good relations inevitable.

The second point is a very important one. I want you as an American citizen and your
viewers to hear about this as well. The former Russian leadership assumed that
the Soviet Union had ceased to exist and therefore there were no longer any ideological
dividing lines. Russia even agreed, voluntarily and proactively, to the collapse
of the Soviet Union and believed that this would be understood by the so-called (now
in scare quotes) “civilized West” as an invitation for cooperation and associateship.
That is what Russia was expecting both from the United States and the so-called
collective West as a whole.

There were smart people, including in Germany. Egon Bahr, a major politician
of the Social Democratic Party, who insisted in his personal conversations with
the Soviet leadership on the brink of the collapse of the Soviet Union that a new
security system should be established in Europe. Help should be given to unify
Germany, but a new system should also be established to include the United States,
Canada, Russia, and other Central European countries. But NATO needs not to expand.
That's what he said: if NATO expands, everything would be just the same as during
the Cold War, only closer to Russia's borders. That's all. He was a wise old man, but no
one listened to him. In fact, he got angry once (we have a record of this conversation
in our archives): “If, he said, you don't listen to me, I'm never setting my foot in Moscow
again.” He was frustrated with the Soviet leadership. He was right, everything
happened just as he had said.

Tucker Carlson: Well, of course, it did come true, and you’ve mentioned it many times.
I think, it’s a fair point. And many in America thought that relations between Russia
and the United States would be fine after the collapse of the Soviet Union, at the core.
But the opposite happened. But have never explained why you think that happened,
except to say that the West fears a strong Russia. But we have a strong China that
the West doesn’t seem to be very afraid of. What about Russia, what do you think
convinced the policymakers to take it down?
Vladimir Putin: The West is afraid of a strong China more than it fears a strong Russia
because Russia has 150 million people, and China has a 1.5 billion population, and its
economy is growing by leaps and bounds — over five percent a year, it used to be even
more. But that's enough for China. As Bismark once put it, potentials are most
important. China's potential is enormous — it is the biggest economy in the world
today in terms of purchasing power parity and the size of the economy. It has already
overtaken the United States, quite a long time ago, and it is growing at a fast clip.

Let's not talk about who is afraid of whom, let's not reason in such terms. And let's get
into the fact that after 1991, when Russia expected that it would be welcomed into
the brotherly family of “civilized nations,” nothing like that happened. You tricked us
(I don't mean you personally when I say “you,” of course, I'm talking about the United
States), the promise was that NATO would not expand eastward, but it happened five
times, there were five waves of expansion. We tolerated all that, we were trying
to persuade them, we were saying: “Please don't, we are as bourgeois now as you are,
we are a market economy, and there is no Communist Party power. Let's negotiate.”

Moreover, I have also said this publicly before (let's look at Yeltsin's times now), there
was a moment when a certain rift started growing between us. Before that, Yeltsin
came to the United States, remember, he spoke in Congress and said the good words:
“God bless America.” Everything he said were signals — let us in.

No. Remember the developments in Yugoslavia. Before that Yeltsin was lavished with
praise, as soon as the developments in Yugoslavia started, he raised his voice
in support of Serbs, and we couldn't but raise our voices for Serbs in their defense.
I understand that there were complex processes underway there, I do. But Russia could
not help raising its voice in support of Serbs, because Serbs are also a special
and close to us nation, with Orthodox culture and so on. It's a nation that has suffered
so much for generations. Well, regardless, what is important is that Yeltsin expressed
his support. What did the United States do? In violation of international law and the UN
Charter it started bombing Belgrade.

It was the United States that let the genie out of the bottle. Moreover, when Russia
protested and expressed its resentment, what was said? The UN Charter
and international law have become obsolete. Now everyone invokes international law,
but at that time they started saying that everything is outdated, everything has to be
changed.
Indeed, some things need to be changed as the balance of power has changed, it's
true, but not in this manner. Yeltsin was immediately dragged through the mud,
accused of alcoholism, of understanding nothing, of knowing nothing. He understood
everything, I assure you.

Well, I became President in 2000. I thought: okay, the Yugoslav issue is over, but we
should try to restore relations. Let's reopen the door that Russia had tried to go
through. And moreover, I've said it publicly, I can reiterate. At a meeting here
in the Kremlin with the outgoing President Bill Clinton, right here in the next room,
I said to him, I asked him, “Bill, do you think if Russia asked to join NATO, do you think it
would happen?” Suddenly he said: “You know, it's interesting, I think yes.” But
in the evening, when we had dinner, he said, “You know, I've talked to my team, no-no,
it's not possible now.” You can ask him, I think he will watch our interview, he'll confirm
it. I wouldn't have said anything like that if it hadn't happened. Okay, well, it's
impossible now.

Tucker Carlson: Were you sincere? Would you have joined NATO?

Vladimir Putin: Look, I asked the question, “Is it possible or not?” And the answer I got
was no. If I was insincere in my desire to find out what the leadership's position was…

Tucker Carlson: But if he had said yes, would you have joined NATO?

Vladimir Putin: If he had said yes, the process of rapprochement would have
commenced, and eventually it might have happened if we had seen some sincere
desire on the part of our partners. But it didn't happen. Well, no means no, okay, fine.

Tucker Carlson: Why do you think that is? Just to get to motive. I know, you’re clearly
bitter about it. I understand. But why do you think the West rebuffed you then? Why
the hostility? Why did the end of the Cold War not fix the relationship? What motivates
this from your point of view?

Vladimir Putin: You said I was bitter about the answer. No, it's not bitterness, it's just
a statement of fact. We're not the bride and groom, bitterness, resentment, it's not
about those kinds of matters in such circumstances. We just realised we weren't
welcome there, that's all. Okay, fine. But let's build relations in another manner, let's
look for common ground elsewhere. Why we received such a negative response, you
should ask your leader. I can only guess why: too big a country, with its own opinion
and so on. And the United States – I have seen how issues are being resolved in NATO.

I will give you another example now, concerning Ukraine. The US leadership exerts
pressure, and all NATO members obediently vote, even if they do not like something.
Now, I'll tell you what happened in this regard with Ukraine in 2008, although it's being
discussed, I’m not going to open a secret to you, say anything new. Nevertheless, after
that, we tried to build relations in different ways. For example, the events in the Middle
East, in Iraq, we were building relations with the United States in a very soft, prudent,
cautious manner.

I repeatedly raised the issue that the United States should not support separatism
or terrorism in the North Caucasus. But they continued to do it anyway. And political
support, information support, financial support, even military support came from
the United States and its satellites for terrorist groups in the Caucasus.

I once raised this issue with my colleague, also the President of the United States. He
says, “It’s impossible! Do you have proof?” I said, “Yes.” I was prepared for this
conversation and I gave him that proof. He looked at it and, you know what he said?
I apologise, but that's what happened, I'll quote. He says, “Well, I’m going to kick their
ass.” We waited and waited for some response – there was none.

I said to the FSB Director: “Write to the CIA. What is the result of the conversation with
the President?” He wrote once, twice, and then we got a reply. We have the answer
in the archive. The CIA replied: “We have been working with the opposition in Russia.
We believe that this is the right thing to do and we will keep on doing it.” Just ridiculous.
Well, okay. We realised that it was out of the question.

Tucker Carlson: Forces in opposition to you? Do you think the CIA is trying to overthrow
your government?

Vladimir Putin: Of course, they meant in that particular case the separatists,
the terrorists who fought with us in the Caucasus. That's who they called
the opposition. This is the second point.

The third moment, a very important one, is the moment when the US missile defense
(ABM) system was created. The beginning. We tried for a long time to persuade
the United States not to do it. Moreover, after I was invited by Bush Jr.’s father, Bush Sr.
to visit his place on the ocean, I had a very serious conversation with President Bush
and his team. I proposed that the United States, Russia and Europe jointly create
a missile defense system that, we believe, if created unilaterally, threatens our security,
despite the fact that the United States officially said that it was being created against
missile threats from Iran. That was the justification for the deployment of the missile
defense system. I suggested working together – Russia, the United States and Europe.
They said it was very interesting. They asked me, “Are you serious?” I said, “Absolutely.”

Tucker Carlson: May I ask what year was this?

Vladimir Putin: I don't remember. It is easy to find out on the Internet, when I was
in the USA at the invitation of Bush Sr. It is even easier to learn it now from a person I’ll
name.

I was told it was very interesting. I said, “Just imagine if we could tackle such a global,
strategic security challenge together. The world would change. We'll probably have
disputes, probably economic and even political ones, but we could drastically change
the situation in the world.” He says, “Yes.” And asks: “Are you serious?” I said,
“Of course.” “We need to think about it,” I was told. I said, “Okay.”

Then Secretary of Defense [Robert] Gates, former Director of the CIA, and Secretary
of State [Condoleezza] Rice came here, to this cabinet. Right here, at this table, they
sat on this side. Me, the Foreign Minister, the Russian Defense Minister – on that side.
They said to me, “Okay, we have thought about it, we agree.” I said, “Thank God,
great.” – “But with some exceptions.”

Tucker Carlson: So, twice you've described US presidents making decisions and then
being undercut by their agency heads. So, it sounds like you're describing a system
that is not run by the people who are elected, in your telling.

Vladimir Putin: That's right, that's right. In the end they just told us to get lost. I am not
going to tell you the details, because I think it is incorrect, after all, it was a confidential
conversation. But our proposal was declined, that’s a fact.

It was right then when I said: “Look, but then we will be forced to take counter
measures. We will create such strike systems that will certainly overcome missile
defense systems.” The answer was: “We are not doing this against you, and you do
what you want, assuming that it is not against us, not against the United States.” I said,
“Okay.”

Very well, that’s the way it went. And we created hypersonic systems, with
intercontinental missiles, and we continue to develop them. We are now ahead
of everyone – the United States and other countries – in terms of the development
of hypersonic strike systems, and we are improving them every day.

But it wasn’t us, we proposed to go the other way, and we were pushed back.

Now, about NATO's expansion to the East. Well, we were promised, no NATO
to the East, not an inch to the East, as we were told. And then what? They said, “Well,
it's not enshrined on paper, so we'll expand.” There were five waves of expansion,
the Baltic states, the whole of Eastern Europe, and so on.

And now I come to the main thing: they have come to Ukraine ultimately. In 2008
at the summit in Bucharest they declared that the doors for Ukraine and Georgia to join
NATO were open.

Now about how decisions are made there. Germany, France seemed to be against it
as well as some other European countries. But then, as it turned out later, President
Bush, and he is such a tough guy, a tough politician, as I was told later, “He exerted
pressure on us and we had to agree.” It's ridiculous, it's like kindergarten. What are
the guarantees? What kind of kindergarten is this, what kind of people are these, who
are they? You see, they were pressed, they agreed. And then they say, “Ukraine won't
be in NATO, you know.” I say, “I don't know, I know you agreed in 2008, why won't you
agree in the future?” “Well, they pressed us then.” I say, “Why won't they press you
tomorrow? And you'll agree again.”

Well, it's nonsensical. Who's there to talk to, I just don't understand. We're ready
to talk. But with whom? What are the guarantees? There are none.

So, they started to develop the territory of Ukraine. Whatever is there, I have told you
the background, how this territory developed, what kind of relations there were with
Russia. Every second or third person there has always had some ties with Russia.
And during the elections in already independent, sovereign Ukraine, which gained its
independence as a result of the Declaration of Independence, and, by the way, it says
that Ukraine is a neutral state, and in 2008 suddenly the doors or gates to NATO were
open to it. Oh, come on! This is not how we agreed. Now, all the presidents that have
come to power in Ukraine, they've relied on the electorate with a good attitude
to Russia in one way or another. This is the south-east of Ukraine, this is a large
number of people. And it was very difficult to dissuade this electorate, which had
a positive attitude towards Russia.

Viktor Yanukovych came to power, and how: the first time he won after President
Kuchma – they organised a third round, which is not provided for in the Constitution
of Ukraine. This is a coup d'état. Just imagine, someone in the United States wouldn’t
like the outcome…

Tucker Carlson: In 2014?

Vladimir Putin: No, before that. This was before that. After President Kuchma, Viktor
Yanukovych won the elections. However, his opponents did not recognize that victory,
the US supported the opposition and the third round was scheduled. What is this? This
is a coup. The US supported it and the winner of the third round came to power.
Imagine if in the US, something was not to someone’s liking and the third round
of election, which the US Constitution does not provide for, was organized,
Nonetheless, it was done in Ukraine. Okay, Viktor Yushchenko who was considered
a pro-Western politician, came to power. Fine, we have built relations with him as well.
He came to Moscow with visits, we visited Kiev. I visited it too. We met in an informal
setting. If he is pro-Western, so be it. It’s fine, let people do their job. The situation
should develop inside the independent Ukraine itself. As a result of Kuchma’s
leadership, things got worse and Viktor Yanukovych came to power after all.

Maybe he wasn’t the best president and politician. I don’t know, I don’t want to give
assessments. However, the issue of the association with the EU came up. We have
always been lenient to this: suit yourself. But when we read through that treaty
of association it turned out to be a problem for us, since we had a free-trade zone
and open customs borders with Ukraine which, under this association, had to open its
borders for Europe, which could have led to flooding of our market.

We said, “No, this is not going to work. We shall close our borders with Ukraine then”.
The customs borders, that is. Yanukovych started to calculate how much Ukraine was
going to gain, how much to lose and said to his European partners: “I need more time
to think before signing.” The moment he said that, the opposition began to take
destructive steps which were supported by the West. It all came down to Maidan
and a coup in Ukraine.

Tucker Carlson: So, he did more trade with Russia than with the EU? Ukraine did…

Vladimir Putin: Of course. It’s not even the matter of trade volume, although
for the most part it is. It is the matter of cooperation ties which the entire Ukrainian
economy was based on. The cooperation ties between enterprises were very close
since the times of the Soviet Union. One enterprise there used to produce components
to be assembled both in Russia and Ukraine and vice versa. There used to be very
close ties.

A coup d’état was staged, although, I shall not delve into details now as I find doing it
inappropriate, the US told us, “Calm Yanukovych down and we will calm the opposition.
Let the situation unfold according to the scenario of a political settlement.” We said,
“Alright. Agreed. Let’s do it this way.” As the Americans requested us, Yanukovych did
use neither the Armed Forces nor the police, yet the armed opposition staged a coup
in Kiev. What is that supposed to mean? “Who do you think you are?”, I wanted to ask
the then US leadership.

Tucker Carlson: With the backing of whom?

Vladimir Putin: With the backing of the CIA, of course. The organization you wanted
to join back in the day, as I understand. Maybe we should thank God they didn’t let you
in. Although, it is a serious organization. I understand. My former vis-à-vis, in the sense
that I served in the First Main Directorate – Soviet Union’s intelligence service. They
have always been our opponents. Work is work.

Technically they did everything right, they achieved their goal of changing
the government. However, from a political standpoint, it was a colossal mistake. Surely,
it was political leadership’s miscalculation. They should have seen what it would evolve
into.

So, in 2008 the doors of NATO were opened for Ukraine. In 2014, there was a coup,
they started persecuting those who did not accept the coup, and it was indeed a coup,
they created a threat to Crimea which we had to take under our protection. They
launched a war in Donbass in 2014, using aircraft and artillery against civilians. This is
when it started. There is a video of aircraft attacking Donetsk from above. They
launched a large-scale military operation, then another one. When they failed, they
started to prepare the next one. All this against the background of military development
of this territory and opening of NATO’s doors.

How could we not express concern over what was happening? From our side, this
would have been a culpable negligence – that’s what it would have been. It’s just that
the US political leadership pushed us to the line we could not cross because doing so
could have ruined Russia itself. Besides, we could not leave our brothers in faith and,
in fact, a part of Russian people, in the face of this “war machine.”

Tucker Carlson: So, that was eight years before the current conflict started. What was
the trigger for you? What was the moment where you decided you had to do this?

Vladimir Putin: Initially, it was the coup in Ukraine that provoked the conflict.

By the way, back then the representatives of three European countries – Germany,
Poland and France – arrived. They were the guarantors of the signed agreement
between the Government of Yanukovych and the opposition. They signed it
as guarantors. Despite that, the opposition staged a coup and all these countries
pretended that they didn’t remember that they were guarantors of a peaceful
settlement. They just threw it in the stove right away and nobody recalls that.

I don’t know if the US know anything about that agreement between the opposition
and the authorities and its three guarantors who, instead of bringing this whole
situation back in the political field, supported the coup. Although, it was meaningless,
believe me. Because President Yanukovych agreed to all conditions, he was ready
to hold early election which he had no chance to win, frankly speaking. Everyone knew
that.

But then why the coup, why the victims? Why threaten Crimea? Why launch
an operation in Donbass? This I do not understand. That is exactly what
the miscalculation is. The CIA did its job to complete the coup. I think one of the Deputy
Secretaries of State said that it cost a large sum of money, almost 5 billion dollars. But
the political mistake was colossal! Why would they have to do that? All this could have
been done legally, without victims, without military action, without losing Crimea. We
would have never considered to even lift a finger if it hadn’t been for the bloody
developments on Maidan.

Because we agreed with the fact that after the collapse of the Soviet Union our borders
should be along the borders of former Union’s republics. We agreed to that. But we
never agreed to NATO’s expansion and moreover we never agreed that Ukraine would
be in NATO. We did not agree to NATO bases there without any discussion with us.
For decades we kept urging them: don’t do this, don’t do that.

And what triggered the latest events? Firstly, the current Ukrainian leadership declared
that it would not implement the Minsk agreements, which had been signed, as you
know, after the events of 2014, in Minsk, where the plan of a peaceful settlement
in Donbass was set forth. But no, the current Ukrainian leadership, foreign minister, all
other officials and then President himself said that they don’t like anything about
the Minsk agreements. In other words, they were not going to implement them. A year
or a year and a half ago, former leaders of Germany and France said openly
to the whole world that they indeed signed the Minsk agreements but they never
intended to implement them. They simply led us by the nose.

Tucker Carlson: Was there anyone free to talk to? Did you call the US President,
Secretary of State and say if you keep militarizing Ukraine with NATO forces, we are
going to act?

Vladimir Putin: We talked about this all the time. We addressed the United States’
and European countries’ leadership to stop these developments immediately,
to implement the Minsk agreements. Frankly speaking, I didn’t know how we were
going to do this but I was ready to implement them. These agreements were
complicated for Ukraine; they included lots of elements of those Donbass territories’
independence. That’s true. However, I was absolutely confident, and I am saying this
to you now: I honestly believed that if we managed to convince the residents
of Donbass – and we had to work hard to convince them to return to the Ukrainian
statehood – then gradually the wounds would start to heal. When this part of territory
reintegrated itself into common economic, social environment, when the pensions
and social benefits were paid again, all the pieces would gradually fall into place.

No, nobody wanted that, everybody wanted to resolve the issue by military force only.
But we could not let that happen.
And the situation got to the point, when the Ukrainian side announced: “No, we will not
implement anything.” They also started preparing for military action. It was they who
started the war in 2014. Our goal is to stop this war. And we did not start this war
in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it.

Tucker Carlson: Do you think you have stopped it now? I mean have you achieved your
aims?

Vladimir Putin: No, we haven't achieved our aims yet, because one of them is
denazification. This means the prohibition of all kinds of neo-Nazi movements. This is
one of the problems that we discussed during the negotiation process, which ended
in Istanbul early last year, and it was not our initiative, because we were told
(by the Europeans, in particular) that “it was necessary to create conditions for the final
signing of the documents.” My counterparts in France and Germany said, “How can you
imagine them signing a treaty with a gun to their heads? The troops should be pulled
back from Kiev.” I said, “All right.” We withdrew the troops from Kiev.

As soon as we pulled back our troops from Kiev, our Ukrainian negotiators immediately
threw all our agreements reached in Istanbul into the bin and got prepared
for a longstanding armed confrontation with the help of the United States and its
satellites in Europe. That is how the situation has developed. And that is how it looks
now.

Tucker Carlson: What is denazification? What would that mean?

Vladimir Putin: That is what I want to talk about right now. It is a very important issue.

Denazification. After gaining independence, Ukraine began to search, as some Western

analysts say, its identity. And it came up with nothing better than to build this identity
upon some false heroes who collaborated with Hitler.

I have already said that in the early 19th century, when the theorists of independence
and sovereignty of Ukraine appeared, they assumed that an independent Ukraine
should have very good relations with Russia. But due to the historical development,
these territories were part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth – Poland, where
Ukrainians were persecuted and treated quite brutally and were subjected to cruel
behaviour. There were also attempts to destroy their identity. All this remained
in the memory of the people. When World War II broke out, part of this extremely
nationalist elite collaborated with Hitler, believing that he would bring them freedom.
The German troops, even the SS troops made Hitler's collaborators do the dirtiest work
of exterminating the Polish and Jewish population. Hence this brutal massacre
of the Polish and Jewish population as well as the Russian population too. This was led
by the persons who are well known – Bandera, Shukhevich. It was these people who
were made national heroes – that is the problem. And we are constantly told that
nationalism and neo-Nazism exist in other countries as well. Yes, there are seedlings,
but we uproot them, and other countries fight against them. But Ukraine is not
the case. These people have been turned into national heroes in Ukraine. Monuments
to these people have been erected, they are displayed on flags, their names are
shouted by crowds that walk with torches, as it was in Nazi Germany. These were
the people who exterminated Poles, Jews and Russians. It is necessary to stop this
practice and prevent the dissemination of this concept.

I say that Ukrainians are part of the one Russian people. They say, “No, we are
a separate people.” Okay, fine. If they consider themselves a separate people, they
have the right to do so, but not on the basis of Nazism, the Nazi ideology.

Tucker Carlson: Would you be satisfied with the territory that you have now?

Vladimir Putin: I will finish answering the question. You just asked a question about
neo-Nazism and denazification.

Look, the President of Ukraine visited Canada. This story is well known but is silenced
in the Western countries: The Canadian parliament introduced a man who,
as the speaker of the parliament said, fought against the Russians during World War II.
Well, who fought against the Russians during World War II? Hitler and his accomplices.
It turned out that this man served in the SS troops. He personally killed Russians,
Poles, and Jews. The SS troops consisted of Ukrainian nationalists who did this dirty
work. The President of Ukraine stood up with the entire Parliament of Canada
and applauded this man. How can this be imagined? The President of Ukraine himself,
by the way, is a Jew by nationality.

Tucker Carlson: Really, my question is: What do you do about it? I mean, Hitler has
been dead for eighty years, Nazi Germany no longer exists, and it’s true. So, I think,
what you are saying, you want to extinguish or at least control Ukrainian nationalism.
But how do you do that?
Vladimir Putin: Listen to me. Your question is very subtle.

And can I tell you what I think? Do not take offense.

Tucker Carlson: Of course!

Vladimir Putin: This question appears to be subtle, it is quite pesky.

You say Hitler has been dead for so many years, 80 years. But his example lives on.
People who exterminated Jews, Russians and Poles are alive. And the President,
the current President of today's Ukraine applauds him in the Canadian Parliament,
gives a standing ovation! Can we say that we have completely uprooted this ideology if
what we see is happening today? That is what denazification is in our understanding.
We have to get rid of those people who maintain this concept and support this practice
and try to preserve it – that is what denazification is. That is what we mean.

Tucker Carlson: Right. My question is almost specific, it was, of course, not a defense
of Nazism. Otherwise, it was a practical question. You don't control the entire country,
you don’t seem like you want to. So, how do you eliminate that culture, or an ideology,
or feelings, or a view of history, in a country that you don’t control? What do you do
about that?

Vladimir Putin: You know, as strange as it may seem to you, during the negotiations
in Istanbul we did agree that – we have it all in writing – neo-Nazism would not be
cultivated in Ukraine, including that it would be prohibited at the legislative level.

Mr. Carlson, we agreed on that. This, it turns out, can be done during the negotiation
process. And there is nothing humiliating for Ukraine as a modern civilized state. Is any
state allowed to promote Nazism? It is not, is it? That is it.

Tucker Carlson: Will there be talks? And why haven’t there been talks about resolving
the conflict in Ukraine? Peace talks.

Vladimir Putin: They have been. They reached a very high stage of coordination
of positions in a complex process, but still they were almost finalized. But after we
withdrew our troops from Kiev, as I have already said, the other side (Ukraine) threw
away all these agreements and obeyed the instructions of Western countries,
European countries, and the United States to fight Russia to the bitter end.

Moreover, the President of Ukraine has legislated a ban on negotiating with Russia. He
signed a decree forbidding everyone to negotiate with Russia. But how are we going
to negotiate if he forbade himself and everyone to do this? We know that he is putting
forward some ideas about this settlement. But in order to agree on something, we need
to have a dialogue. Is not that right?

Tucker Carlson: Well, but you would not be speaking to the Ukrainian president, you
would be speaking to the American president. When was the last time you spoke to Joe
Biden?

Vladimir Putin: I cannot remember when I talked to him. I do not remember, we can
look it up.

Tucker Carlson: You do not remember?!

Vladimir Putin: No, why? Do I have to remember everything? I have my own things
to do. We have domestic political affairs.

Tucker Carlson: But he is funding the war that you are fighting, so I think that would be
memorable?

Vladimir Putin: Well, yes, he funds, but I talked to him before the special military
operation, of course. And I said to him then, by the way – I will not go into details,
I never do – but I said to him then: “I believe that you are making a huge mistake
of historic proportions by supporting everything that is happening there, in Ukraine,
by pushing Russia away.” I told him, told him repeatedly, by the way. I think that would
be correct if I stop here.

Tucker Carlson: What did he say?

Vladimir Putin: Ask him, please. It is easier for you, you are a citizen of the United
States, go and ask him. It is not appropriate for me to comment on our conversation.

Tucker Carlson: But you haven’t spoken to him since before February of 2022?
Vladimir Putin: No, we haven't spoken. Certain contacts are being maintained though.
Speaking of which, do you remember what I told you about my proposal to work
together on a missile defense system?

Tucker Carlson: Yes.

Vladimir Putin: You can ask all of them. All of them are safe and sound, thank God.
The former President, Condoleezza [Rice] is safe and sound, and, I think, Mr. Gates,
and the current Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Mr. Burns, the then
Ambassador to Russia, in my opinion, a very successful Ambassador. They were all
witnesses to these conversations. Ask them.

Same here, if you are interested in what Mr. President Biden responded to me, ask him.
At any rate, I talked to him about it.

Tucker Carlson: I am definitely interested. But from the other side it seems like it could
devolve, evolve into something that brings the entire world into conflict, and could
initiate a nuclear launch, and so why don’t you just call Biden and say, “Let’s work this
out”?

Vladimir Putin: What's there to work out? It's very simple. I repeat, we have contacts
through various agencies. I will tell you what we are saying on this matter and what we
are conveying to the US leadership: “If you really want to stop fighting, you need to stop
supplying weapons. It will be over within a few weeks. That's it. And then we can agree
on some terms before you do that, stop.”

What's easier? Why would I call him? What should I talk to him about? Or beg him
for what? “You're going to deliver such and such weapons to Ukraine. Oh, I'm so afraid,
please don't do that.” What is there to talk about?

Tucker Carlson: Do you think NATO was worried about this becoming a global war
or nuclear conflict?

Vladimir Putin: At least that's what they're talking about. And they are trying
to intimidate their own population with an imaginary Russian threat. This is an obvious
fact. And thinking people, not philistines, but thinking people, analysts, those who are
engaged in real politics, just smart people understand perfectly well that this is fake.
They are trying to fuel the Russian threat.

Tucker Carlson: The threat I think you were referring to is Russian invasion of Poland,
Latvia – expansionist behaviour. Can you imagine a scenario where you send Russian
troops to Poland?

Vladimir Putin: Only in one case: if Poland attacks Russia. Why? Because we have no
interest in Poland, Latvia or anywhere else. Why would we do that? We simply don't
have any interest. It’s just threat mongering.

Tucker Carlson: Well, the argument, I know you know this, is that, well, he invaded
Ukraine – he has territorial aims across the continent. And you are saying
unequivocally, you don’t?

Vladimir Putin: It is absolutely out of the question. You just don't have to be any kind
of analyst, it goes against common sense to get involved in some kind of global war.
And a global war will bring all of humanity to the brink of destruction. It's obvious.

There are, certainly, means of deterrence. They have been scaring everyone with us all
along: tomorrow Russia will use tactical nuclear weapons, tomorrow Russia will use
that, no, the day after tomorrow. So what? These are just horror stories for people
in the street in order to extort additional money from US taxpayers and European
taxpayers in the confrontation with Russia in the Ukrainian theatre of war. The goal is
to weaken Russia as much as possible.

Tucker Carlson: One of our senior United States senators from the State of New York,
Chuck Schumer, said yesterday, I believe, that we have to continue to fund
the Ukrainian effort or US soldiers, citizens could wind up fighting there. How do you
assess that?

Vladimir Putin: This is a provocation, and a cheap provocation at that.

I do not understand why American soldiers should fight in Ukraine. There are
mercenaries from the United States there. The biggest number of mercenaries comes
from Poland, with mercenaries from the United States in second place,
and mercenaries from Georgia in third place. Well, if somebody has the desire to send
regular troops, that would certainly bring humanity on the brink of a very serious, global
conflict. This is obvious.

Do the United States need this? What for? Thousands of miles away from your national
territory! Don't you have anything better to do? You have issues on the border, issues
with migration, issues with the national debt – more than 33 trillion dollars. You have
nothing better to do, so you should fight in Ukraine?

Wouldn't it be better to negotiate with Russia? Make an agreement, already

understanding the situation that is developing today, realizing that Russia will fight
for its interests to the end. And, realizing this, actually return to common sense, start
respecting our country and its interests and look for certain solutions. It seems to me
that this is much smarter and more rational.

Tucker Carlson: Who blew up Nord Stream?

Vladimir Putin: You, for sure. (Laughter.)

Tucker Carlson: I was busy that day. I did not blow up Nord Stream.

Vladimir Putin: You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi.

Tucker Carlson: Do you have evidence that NATO or the CIA did it?

Vladimir Putin: You know, I won't get into details, but people always say in such cases:
“Look for someone who is interested.” But in this case we should not only look
for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities. Because
there may be many people interested, but not all of them are capable of sinking
to the bottom of the Baltic Sea and carrying out this explosion. These two components
should be connected: who is interested and who is capable of doing it.

Tucker Carlson: But I am confused. I mean, that’s the biggest act of industrial terrorism
ever and it’s the largest emission of CO₂ in history. Okay, so, if you had evidence
and presumably, given your security services, your intel services, you would, that NATO,
the US, CIA, the West did this, why wouldn’t you present it and win a propaganda
victory?
Vladimir Putin: In the war of propaganda it is very difficult to defeat the United States
because the United States controls all the world’s media and many European media.
The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial
institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is
cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources
of information, and we will not achieve results. It is clear to the whole world what
happened, and even American analysts talk about it directly. It's true.

Tucker Carlson: Yes. But here is a question you may be able to answer. You worked
in Germany, famously. The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, that
they damaged their economy greatly – it may never recover. Why are they being silent
about it? That is very confusing to me. Why wouldn’t the Germans say something about
it?

Vladimir Putin: This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided
by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests, otherwise it is
difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord
Stream-1, which was blown up, and Nord Stream-2 was damaged, but one pipe is safe
and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it, but Germany does not open
it. We are ready, please.

There is another route through Poland, called Yamal-Europe, which also allows
for a large flow. Poland has closed it, but Poland pecks from the German hand, it
receives money from pan-European funds, and Germany is the main donor to these
pan-European funds. Germany feeds Poland to a certain extent. And they closed
the route to Germany. Why? I don't understand.

Ukraine, to which the Germans supply weapons and give money. Germany is
the second sponsor after the United States in terms of financial aid to Ukraine. There
are two gas routes through Ukraine. They simply closed one route, the Ukrainians.
Open the second route and get gas from Russia. They do not open it. Why don't
the Germans say: “Look, guys, we give you money and weapons. Open up the valve,
please, let the gas from Russia pass through for us.

We are buying liquefied gas at exorbitant prices in Europe, which brings the level of our
competitiveness, and economy in general down to zero. Do you want us to give you
money? Let us have a decent existence, make money for our economy, because this is
where the money we give you comes from.” They refuse to do so. Why? Ask them.
(Knocks on the table.) That is what it is like in their heads. Those are highly
incompetent people.

Tucker Carlson: Well, maybe the world is breaking into two hemispheres. One with
cheap energy, the other without it. And I want to ask you that, if we are now a multipolar
world, obviously we are, can you describe the blocs or alliances? Who is on each side,
do you think?

Vladimir Putin: Listen, you have said that the world is breaking into two hemispheres.
A human brain is divided into two hemispheres: one is responsible for one type
of activities, the other one is more about creativity and so on. But it is still one
and the same head. The world should be a single whole, security should be shared,
rather than meant for the “golden billion.” That is the only scenario where the world
could be stable, sustainable and predictable. Until then, while the head is split into two
parts, it is an illness, a serious adverse condition. It is a period of a severe disease that
the world is now going through.

But I think that, thanks to honest journalism — this work is akin to work of the doctors,
this could somehow be remedied.

Tucker Carlson: Well, let’s just give one example — the US dollar, which has, kind of,
united the world in a lot of ways, maybe not to your advantage, but certainly to ours. Is
that going away as the reserve currency, the universally accepted currency? How have
sanctions, do you think, changed the dollar’s place in the world?

Vladimir Putin: You know, to use the dollar as a tool of foreign policy struggle is one
of the biggest strategic mistakes made by the US political leadership. The dollar is
the cornerstone of the United States' power. I think everyone understands very well
that, no matter how many dollars are printed, they are quickly dispersed all over
the world. Inflation in the United States is minimal. It is about 3 or 3.4 percent, which
is, I think, totally acceptable for the US. But they won't stop printing. What does
the debt of 33 trillion dollars tell us about? It is about the emission.

Nevertheless, it is the main weapon used by the United States to preserve its power
across the world. As soon as the political leadership decided to use the US dollar
as a tool of political struggle, a blow was dealt to this American power. I would not like
to use any strong language, but it is a stupid thing to do, and a grave mistake.
Look at what is going on in the world. Even the United States' allies are now downsizing
their dollar reserves. Seeing this, everyone starts looking for ways to protect
themselves. But the fact that the United States applies restrictive measures to certain
countries, such as placing restrictions on transactions, freezing assets, etc., causes
grave concern and sends a signal to the whole world.

What did we have here? Until 2022, about 80 percent of Russia's foreign trade
transactions were made in US dollars and euros. US dollars accounted
for approximately 50 percent of our transactions with third countries, while currently it
is down to 13 percent. It was not us who banned the use of the US dollar, we had no
such intention. It was the decision of the United States to restrict our transactions
in US dollars. I think it is complete foolishness from the point of view of the interests
of the United States itself and its taxpayers, as it damages the US economy,
undermines the power of the United States across the world.

By the way, our transactions in yuan accounted for about 3 percent. Today, 34 percent
of our transactions are made in Rubles, and about as much, a little over 34 percent,
in Yuan.

Why did the United States do this? My only guess is self-assurance. They probably
thought it would lead to a full collapse, but nothing collapsed. Moreover, other
countries, including oil producers, are thinking of and already accepting payments
for oil in yuan. Do you even realize what is going on or not? Does anyone in the United
States realize this? What are you doing? You are cutting yourself off… all experts say
this. Ask any intelligent and thinking person in the United States what the dollar means
for the US? You are killing it with your own hands.

Tucker Carlson: I think that is a fair assessment. The question is what comes next?
And maybe you trade one colonial power for another, much less sentimental
and forgiving colonial power? Is the BRICS, for example, in danger of being completely
dominated by the Chinese economy? In a way that is not good for their sovereignty. Do
you worry about that?

Vladimir Putin: We have heard those bogeyman stories before. It is a bogeyman story.
We are neighbours with China. You cannot choose neighbours, just as you cannot
choose close relatives. We share a border of several thousand kilometres with them.
This is number one.
Second, we have a centuries-long history of coexistence, we are used to it.

Third, China's foreign policy philosophy is not aggressive, its idea is to always look
for compromise, and we can see that.

The next point is as follows. We are always told the same bogeyman story, and here it
goes again, though in a euphemistic form, but it is still the same bogeyman story:
the cooperation with China keeps increasing. The pace at which China's cooperation
with Europe is growing is higher and greater than that of the growth of Chinese-Russian
cooperation. Ask Europeans: aren’t they afraid? They might be, I do not know, but they
are still trying to access China's market at all costs, especially now that they are facing
economic problems. Chinese businesses are also exploring the European market.

Do Chinese businesses have small presence in the United States? Yes, the political
decisions are such that they are trying to limit their cooperation with China.

It is to your own detriment, Mr Tucker, that you are limiting cooperation with China, you
are hurting yourself. It is a delicate matter, and there are no silver bullet solutions, just
as it is with the dollar.

So, before introducing any illegitimate sanctions — illegitimate in terms of the Charter
of the United Nations — one should think very carefully. I think, those who make
decisions have a problem with that.

Tucker Carlson: So, you said a moment ago that the world would be a lot better if it
were not broken into competing alliances, if there was cooperation globally. One
of the reasons you don’t have that is because the current American administration is
dead set against you. Do you think if there was a new administration after Joe Biden
that you would be able to re-establish communication with the US government?
Or does it not matter who the President is?

Vladimir Putin: I will tell you. But let me finish the previous thought. We, together with
my colleague and friend President Xi Jinping, set a goal to reach 200 billion dollars
of mutual trade with China last year. We have exceeded this level. According to our
figures, our bilateral trade with China totals already 230 billion, and the Chinese
statistics says it is 240 billion dollars.
One more important thing: our trade is well-balanced, mutually complementary in high-
tech, energy, scientific research and development. It is very balanced.

As for BRICS, where Russia took over the presidency this year, the BRICS countries are,
by and large, developing very rapidly.

Look, if memory serves me right, back in 1992, the share of the G7 countries
in the world economy amounted to 47 percent, whereas in 2022 it was down to, I think,
a little over 30 percent. The BRICS countries accounted for only 16 percent in 1992,
but now their share is greater than that of the G7. It has nothing to do with the events
in Ukraine. This is due to the trends of global development and world economy that
I mentioned just now, and this is inevitable. This will keep happening, it is like the rise
of the sun — you cannot prevent the sun from rising, you have to adapt to it.

How do the United States adapt? With the help of force: sanctions, pressure,
bombings, and use of armed forces. This is about self-conceit. Your political
establishment does not understand that the world is changing (due to objective
circumstances), and in order to preserve your level — even if someone aspires, pardon
me, to the level of dominance — you have to make the right decisions in a competent
and timely manner. Such brutal actions, including with regard to Russia and, say, other
countries, are counterproductive. This is an obvious fact; it has already become
evident.

You just asked me if another leader comes and changes something. It is not about
the leader, it is not about the personality of a particular person. I had a very good
relationship with, say, Bush. I know that in the United States he was portrayed as some
kind of a country boy who does not understand much. I assure you that is not the case.
I think he made a lot of mistakes with regard to Russia, too. I told you about 2008
and the decision in Bucharest to open the NATO’s doors for Ukraine and so on. That
happened during his presidency. He actually exerted pressure on the Europeans.

But in general, on a personal human level, I had a very good relationship with him. He
was no worse than any other American, or Russian, or European politician. I assure
you, he understood what he was doing as well as others. I had such personal
relationships with Trump as well.
It is not about the personality of the leader, it is about the elites’ mindset. If the idea
of domination at any cost, based also on forceful actions, dominates the American
society, nothing will change, it will only get worse. But if, in the end, one comes
to the awareness that the world has been changing due to objective circumstances,
and that one should be able to adapt to them in time, using the advantages that the US
still has today, then, perhaps, something may change.

Look, China's economy has become the first economy in the world in purchasing power
parity; in terms of volume it overtook the US a long time ago. The USA comes second,
then India (one and a half billion people), and then Japan, with Russia in the fifth place.
Russia was the first economy in Europe last year, despite all the sanctions
and restrictions. Is this normal, from your point of view: sanctions, restrictions,
impossibility of payments in dollars, being cut off from SWIFT services, sanctions
against our ships carrying oil, sanctions against airplanes, sanctions in everything,
everywhere? The largest number of sanctions in the world which are applied – are
applied against Russia. And we have become Europe's first economy during this time.

The tools that the US uses don't work. Well, one has to think about what to do. If this
realization comes to the ruling elites, then yes, then the first person of the state will act
in anticipation of what the voters and the people who make decisions at various levels
expect from this person. Then maybe something will change.

Tucker Carlson: But you are describing two different systems. You say that the leader
acts in the interests of the voters, but you also say that these decisions are not made
by the leader – they are made by the ruling classes. You have run this country for so
long, you have known all these American presidents. What are those power centres
in the United States, do you think? And who actually makes the decisions?

Vladimir Putin: I don't know. America is a complex country, conservative on the one
hand, rapidly changing on the other. It's not easy for us to sort it all out.

Who makes decisions in the elections – is it possible to understand this, when each
state has its own legislation, each state regulates itself, someone can be excluded
from the elections at the state level. It is a two-stage electoral system, it is very difficult
for us to understand it.
Certainly there are two parties that are dominant, the Republicans and the Democrats,
and within this party system, there are centres that make decisions, that prepare
decisions.

Then, look, why, in my opinion, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, such
an erroneous, rough, completely unjustified policy of pressure was pursued against
Russia? After all, this is a policy of pressure. NATO expansion, support
for the separatists in the Caucasus, creation of a missile defense system – these are
all elements of pressure. Pressure, pressure, pressure.

Then, dragging Ukraine into NATO is all about pressure, pressure, pressure. Why?
I think, among other things, because excessive production capacities were created.
During the confrontation with the Soviet Union, there were many centres created
and specialists on the Soviet Union, who could not do anything else. It seemed to them,
they convinced the political leadership: it is necessary to continue “chiselling” Russia,
to try to break it up, to create on this territory several quasi-state entities and to subdue
them in a divided form, to use their combined potential for the future struggle with
China. This is a mistake, including the excessive potential of those who worked
for the confrontation with the Soviet Union. It is necessary to get rid of this, there
should be new, fresh forces, people who look into the future and understand what is
happening in the world.

Look at how Indonesia is developing! 600 million people. Where can we get away from
that? Nowhere, we just have to assume that Indonesia will enter (it is already in)
the club of the world's leading economies, no matter if someone likes or dislikes it.

Yes, we understand and are aware that in the United States, despite all the economic
problems, the situation is still normal with the economy growing decently, the GDP is
growing by 2.5 percent, if I am not mistaken.

But if we want to ensure the future, then we need to change our approach to what is
changing. As I already said, the world would nevertheless change regardless of how
the developments in Ukraine end. The world is changing. In the United States
themselves, experts write that the United States is nonetheless gradually changing its
position in the world, it is your experts who write that, I just read them. The only
question is how this would happen – painfully and quickly or gently and gradually.
And this is written by people who are not anti-American; they simply follow global
development trends. That's it.
And in order to assess them and change policies, we need people who think, look
forward, can analyse and recommend certain decisions at the level of political leaders.

Tucker Carlson: I just have to ask. You have said clearly that NATO expansion eastward
is a violation of the promise you were all made in the 1990s. It is a threat to your
country. Right before you sent troops into Ukraine the Vice-President of the United
States spoke at the Security Conference and encouraged the President of Ukraine
to join NATO. Do you think that was an effort to provoke you into military action?

Vladimir Putin: I repeat once again, we have repeatedly, repeatedly proposed to seek
a solution to the problems that arose in Ukraine after the 2014 coup d’état through
peaceful means. But no one listened to us. And moreover, the Ukrainian leaders who
were under the complete US control, suddenly declared that they would not comply
with the Minsk agreements, they disliked everything there, and continued military
activity in that territory.

And in parallel, that territory was being exploited by NATO military structures under
the guise of various personnel training and retraining centres. They essentially began
to create bases there. That's all.

Ukraine announced that the Russians were (a law was adopted) a non-titular nation,
while passing laws that limit the rights of non-titular nations in Ukraine. Ukraine, having
received all these southeastern territories as a gift from the Russian people, suddenly
announced that the Russians were a non-titular nation in that territory. Is it normal? All
this put together led to the decision to end the war that neo-Nazis started in Ukraine
in 2014.

Tucker Carlson: Do you think Zelensky has the freedom to negotiate the settlement
to this conflict?

Vladimir Putin: I don’t know the details, of course it’s difficult for me to judge, but
I believe he has, in any case, he used to have. His father fought against the fascists,
Nazis during World War II, I once talked to him about this. I said: “Volodya, what are you
doing? Why are you supporting neo-Nazis in Ukraine today, while your father fought
against fascism? He was a front-line soldier.” I will not tell you what he answered, this
is a separate topic, and I think it’s incorrect for me to do so.
But as to the freedom of choice – why not? He came to power on the expectations
of Ukrainian people that he would lead Ukraine to peace. He talked about this, it was
thanks to this that he won the election overwhelmingly. But then, when he came
to power, in my opinion, he realized two things: firstly, it is better not to clash with neo-
Nazis and nationalists, because they are aggressive and very active, you can expect
anything from them, and secondly, the US-led West supports them and will always
support those who antagonize with Russia – it is beneficial and safe. So he took
the relevant position, despite promising his people to end the war in Ukraine. He
deceived his voters.

Tucker Carlson: But do you think at this point – as of February 2024 – he has
the latitude, the freedom to speak with you or government directly, which would clearly
help his country or the world? Can he do that, do you think?

Vladimir Putin: Why not? He considers himself head of state, he won the elections.
Although we believe in Russia that the coup d’état is the primary source of power
for everything that happened after 2014, and in this sense, even today’s government is
flawed. But he considers himself the president, and he is recognized by the United
States, all of Europe and practically the rest of the world in such a capacity – why not?
He can.

We negotiated with Ukraine in Istanbul, we agreed, he was aware of this. Moreover,

the negotiation group leader, Mr. Arakhamia is his last name, I believe, still heads
the faction of the ruling party, the party of the President in the Rada. He still heads
the Presidential faction in the Rada, the country’s parliament, he still sits there. He
even put his preliminary signature on the document I am telling you about. But then he
publicly stated to the whole world: “We were ready to sign this document, but Mr.
Johnson, then the Prime Minister of Great Britain, came and dissuaded us from doing
this saying it was better to fight Russia. They would give us everything we needed
to return what was lost during the clashes with Russia. And we agreed with this
proposal.” Look, his statement has been published. He said this publicly.

Can they return to this or not? The question is: do they want it or not?

Further on, President of Ukraine issued a decree prohibiting negotiations with us. Let
him cancel that decree and that’s it. We have never refused negotiations indeed. We
hear all the time: is Russia ready? Yes, we have not refused! It was them who publicly
refused. Well, let him cancel his decree and enter into negotiations. We have never
refused.

And the fact that they obeyed the demand or persuasion of Mr. Johnson, the former
Prime Minister of Great Britain, seems ridiculous and very sad to me. Because, as Mr.
Arakhamia put it: “We could have stopped these hostilities, this war a year and a half
ago already. But the British persuaded us, and we refused this.” Where is Mr. Johnson
now? And the war continues.

Tucker Carlson: That is a good question. Why did he do that?

Vladimir Putin: Hell knows. I don't understand it myself. There was a general starting
point. For some reason, everyone had the illusion that Russia could be defeated
on the battlefield. Because of arrogance, because of a pure heart, but not because
of great intellect.

Tucker Carlson: You have described the connection between Russia and Ukraine; you
have described Russia itself, a couple of times as Orthodox – that is central to your
understanding of Russia. What does that mean for you? You are a Cristian leader
by your own description. So what effect does that have on you?

Vladimir Putin: You know, as I already mentioned, in 988 Prince Vladimir himself was
baptized following the example of his grandmother, Princess Olga, and then he
baptized his retinue, and then gradually, over the course of several years, he baptized
all Rus. It was a lengthy process – from pagans to Christians, it took many years. But
in the end, this Orthodoxy, Eastern Christianity, deeply rooted itself
in the consciousness of the Russian people.

When Russia expanded and absorbed other nations who profess Islam, Buddhism
and Judaism, Russia has always been very loyal to those people who profess other
religions. This is its strength. This is absolutely clear.

And the fact is that the main postulates, main values are very similar, not to say
the same, in all world religions I’ve just mentioned and which are the traditional
religions of the Russian Federation, Russia. By the way, Russian authorities were
always very careful about the culture and religion of those peoples who came to join
the Russian Empire. This, in my opinion, forms the basis of both security and stability
of the Russian statehood – all the peoples inhabiting Russia basically consider it their
Motherland.

If, say, people move over to you or to Europe from Latin America – an even clearer
and more understandable example – people come, but yet they have come to you
or to European countries from their historical homeland. And people who profess
different religions in Russia consider Russia their Motherland, they have no other
Motherland. We are together, this is one big family. And our traditional values are very
similar. I’ve just mentioned one big family, but everyone has his/her own family,
and this is the basis of our society. And if we say that the Motherland
and a specific family are connected with each other, it is indeed the case, since it is
impossible to ensure a normal future for our children and our families unless we
ensure a normal, sustainable future for the entire country, for the Motherland. That is
why patriotic sentiment is so strong in Russia.

Tucker Carlson: Can I say, the one way in which religions are different is that
Christianity is specifically a non-violent religion. Jesus says, “Turn the other cheek,”
“don’t kill,” and so on. How can a leader who has to kill, of any country, how can
a leader be a Christian? How do you reconcile that to yourself?

Vladimir Putin: It is very easy: when it comes to protecting oneself and one’s family,
one’s homeland. We don’t attack anyone. When did the developments in Ukraine start?
Since the coup d’état and the hostilities in Donbass began, that’s when they started.
And we are protecting our people, ourselves, our homeland and our future.

As for religion in general. You know, it’s not about external manifestations, it’s not
about going to church every day or banging your head on the floor. It is in the heart.
And our culture is so human-oriented. Dostoevsky, who is very well known in the West
as the genius of Russian culture, Russian literature, spoke a lot about this, about
the Russian soul.

After all, Western society is more pragmatic. Russian people think more about
the eternal, about moral values. I don’t know, maybe you won’t agree with me, but
Western culture is more pragmatic after all.

I’m not saying this is bad, it makes it possible for today’s “golden billion” to achieve
good success in production, even in science, and so on. There's nothing wrong with
that, I'm just saying that we kind of look the same, but our minds are built a little
differently.

Tucker Carlson: So do you see the supernatural at work? As you look out across what’s
happening in the world now, do you see God at work? Do you ever think to yourself:
these are forces that are not human?

Vladimir Putin: No, to be honest, I don't think so. My opinion is that the development
of the world community is in accordance with the inherent laws, and those laws are
what they are. It's always been this way in the history of mankind. Some nations
and countries rose, became stronger and more numerous, and then left
the international stage, losing the status they were accustomed to. There is probably
no need for me to give examples, but we could start with Genghis Khan and the Horde
conquerors, the Golden Horde, and then end with the Roman Empire. It seems that
there has never been anything like the Roman Empire in the history of mankind.

Nevertheless, the potential of the barbarians gradually grew, as did their population.
In general, the barbarians were getting stronger and began to develop economically,
as we would say today. This eventually led to the collapse of the Roman Empire
and the regime imposed by the Romans. However, it took five centuries for the Roman
Empire to fall apart. The difference with what is happening now is that all the processes
of change are happening at a much faster pace than in Roman times.

Tucker Carlson: So when does the AI empire start do you think?

Vladimir Putin: (Laughing.) You are asking increasingly more complicated questions.
To answer them, you need to be an expert in big numbers, big data and AI.

Mankind is currently facing many threats. Due to genetic research, it is now possible
to create a superhuman, a specialized human being – a genetically engineered athlete,
scientist, military man.

There are reports that Elon Musk has already had a chip implanted in the human brain
in the USA.

Tucker Carlson: What do you think of that?

Vladimir Putin: Well, I think there’s no stopping Elon Musk, he will do as he sees fit.
Nevertheless, you need to find some common ground with him, search for ways
to persuade him. I think he’s a smart person, I truly believe he is. So you need to reach
an agreement with him because this process needs to be formalized and subjected
to certain rules.

Humanity has to consider what is going to happen due to the newest developments
in genetics or in AI. One can make an approximate prediction of what will happen. Once
mankind felt an existential threat coming from nuclear weapons, all nuclear nations
began to come to terms with one another since they realized that negligent use
of nuclear weaponry could drive humanity to extinction.

It is impossible to stop research in genetics or AI today, just as it was impossible to stop

the use of gunpowder back in the day. But as soon as we realize that the threat comes
from unbridled and uncontrolled development of AI, or genetics, or any other fields,
the time will come to reach an international agreement on how to regulate these
things.

Tucker Carlson: I appreciate all the time you’ve given us. I just want to ask you one last
question and it’s about someone who is very famous in the United States, probably not
here. Evan Gershkovich who is the Wall Street Journal reporter, he is 32 and he’s been
in prison for almost a year. This is a huge story in the United States and I just want
to ask you directly without getting into details of your version of what happened, if
as a sign of your decency you’ll be willing to release him to us and we’ll bring him back
to the United States?

Vladimir Putin: We have done so many gestures of goodwill out of decency that I think
we have run out of them. We have never seen anyone reciprocate to us in a similar
manner. However, in theory, we can say that we do not rule out that we can do that if
our partners take reciprocal steps.

When I say “partners,” I, first of all, refer to special services. Special services are
in contact with one another, they are talking about the matter in question. There is no
taboo to settle the issue. We are willing to solve it, but there are certain terms being
discussed via special services channels. I believe an agreement can be reached.
Tucker Carlson: So, typically, I mean, this stuff has happened for, obviously, centuries.
One country catches other spy within its borders and trades it for one of its own intel
guys in other country. I think what makes it, and it’s not my business, but what makes it
different is that this guy is obviously not a spy, he is a kid, and maybe he was breaking
a law in some way but he is not a superspy, and everybody knows that and he has been
held hostage and exchange, which is true, with respect, it’s true and everyone knows
it’s true. So maybe he is in a different category, maybe it’s not fair to ask for somebody
else in exchange for letting him out. Maybe it degrades Russia to do that.

Vladimir Putin: You know, you can give different interpretations to what constitutes
a “spy,” but there are certain things provided by law. If a person gets secret
information, and does that in a conspiratorial manner, then this is qualified
as espionage. And that is exactly what he was doing. He was receiving classified,
confidential information, and he did it covertly. Maybe he had been implicated in that,
someone could have dragged him into that, maybe he did that out of carelessness,
or on his own initiative. Considering the sheer facts, this is qualified as espionage.
The fact has been proven, as he was caught red-handed when he was receiving this
information. If it had been some far-fetched excuse, some fabrication, something not
proven, it would have been a different story then. But he was caught red-handed when
he was secretly getting confidential information. What is it, then?

Tucker Carlson: But are you suggesting he was working for the US government
or NATO? Or he was just a reporter who was given material he wasn’t supposed
to have? Those seem like very different, very different things.

Vladimir Putin: I don’t know who he was working for. But I would like to reiterate that
getting classified information in secret is called espionage, and he was working
for the US special services, some other agencies. I don’t think that he was working
for Monaco, as Monaco is hardly interested in getting that information. It is up
to the special services to come to an agreement. Some groundwork has been laid.
There are people who, in our view, are not connected with special services.

Let me tell you a story about a person serving a sentence in an allied country of the US.
That person, due to patriotic sentiments, eliminated a bandit in one of the European
capitals. During the events in the Caucasus, do you know what he [bandit] was doing?
I don’t want to say that, but I will do it anyway. He was laying our soldiers, taken
prisoner, on the road and then he drove his car over their heads. What kind of a person
is that? Can he be even called a human? But there was a patriot who eliminated him
in one of the European capitals. Whether he did that of his own volition or not, that is
a different question.

Tucker Carlson: Evan Gershkovich, that’s a completely different, I mean, this is a thirty-
two year old newspaper reporter.

Vladimir Putin: He committed something different.

Tucker Carlson: He is just a journalist.

Vladimir Putin: He is not just a journalist, I reiterate, he is a journalist who was secretly
getting confidential information.

Yes, it is different, but still, I am talking about other people who are essentially
controlled by the US authorities wherever they are serving a sentence. There is
an ongoing dialogue between the special services. This has to be resolved in a calm,
responsible and professional manner. They are keeping in touch, so let them do their
work.

I do not rule out that the person you referred to, Mr. Gershkovich, may return to his
homeland. By the end of the day, it does not make any sense to keep him in prison
in Russia. We want the US special services to think about how they can contribute
to achieving the goals our special services are pursuing. We are ready to talk.
Moreover, the talks are underway, and there have been many successful examples
of these talks crowned with success. Probably this is going to be crowned with success
as well, but we have to come to an agreement.

Tucker Carlson: I hope you’ll let him out. Mr. President, thank you!

Vladimir Putin: I also want him to return to his homeland at last. I am absolutely
sincere. But let me say once again, the dialogue continues. The more public we render
things of this nature, the more difficult it becomes to resolve them. Everything has to be
done in a calm manner.

Tucker Carlson: I wonder if that’s true with the war though also, I mean, I guess I want
to ask one more question which is, and maybe you don’t want to say so for strategic
reasons, but are you worried that what’s happening in Ukraine could lead to something
much larger and much more horrible and how motivated are you just to call the US
government and say, “let’s come to terms”?

Vladimir Putin: I already said that we did not refuse to talk. We are willing to negotiate.
It is the Western side, and Ukraine is obviously a satellite state of the US. It is evident.
I do not want you to take it as if I am looking for a strong word or an insult, but we both
understand what is happening.

The financial support, 72 billion dollars, was provided. Germany ranks second, then
other European countries come. Dozens of billions of dollars are going to Ukraine.
There is a huge influx of weapons.

In this case you should tell the current Ukrainian leadership to stop and come
to the negotiating table, rescind this absurd decree. We did not refuse.

Tucker Carlson: Well, sure, you have already said it — I didn’t think you meant it
as an insult — because you have already said, correctly, it's been reported that Ukraine
was prevented from negotiating peace settlement by the former British prime minister
acting on behalf of the Biden administration. Of course, it's our satellite, big countries
control small countries, that's not new. And that is why I asked about dealing directly
with the Biden administration, which is making these decisions, not president Zelensky
of Ukraine.

Vladimir Putin: Well, if the Zelensky administration in Ukraine refused to negotiate,

I assume that they did it under the instruction from Washington. If Washington believes
it to be the wrong decision, let it abandon it, let it find a delicate excuse so that no one
is insulted, let it come up with a way out. It was not us who made this decision, it was
them, so let them go back on it. That is it.

However, they made the wrong decision and now we have to look for a way out of this
situation, to correct their mistakes. They did it so let them correct it themselves. We
support this.

Tucker Carlson: So, I just want to make sure I am not misunderstanding what you are
saying — and I don't think that I am — I think you are saying you want a negotiated
settlement to what's happening in Ukraine.
Vladimir Putin: Right. And we made it, we prepared a huge document in Istanbul that
was initialled by the head of the Ukrainian delegation. He affixed his signature
to the extract from the treaty, not the whole treaty but the extract. He put his signature
and then he himself said: “We were ready to sign it and the war would have been over
long ago, eighteen months ago. However, Prime Minister Johnson came, talked us out
of it and we missed that chance.” Well, they missed it, they made a mistake, let them
get back to that, that is all. Why do we have to bother ourselves and correct somebody
else’s mistakes?

I know one can say it is our mistake, it was us who intensified the situation and decided
to put an end to the war that started in 2014 in Donbass, as I have already said,
by means of weapons. Let me get back to further in history, I already told you this, we
were just discussing it. Let us go back to 1991 when we were promised that NATO
would not be expanded, to 2008 when the doors to NATO opened, to the Declaration
of State Sovereignty of Ukraine declaring Ukraine a neutral state. Let us go back
to the fact that NATO and US military bases, British bases started to appear
on the territory of Ukraine creating threats for us. Let us go back to coup d'état
in Ukraine in 2014. It is pointless though, isn’t it? We may go back and forth endlessly.
But they stopped negotiations. Is it a mistake? Yes. Correct it. We are ready. What else
is needed?

Tucker Carlson: Do you think it is too humiliating at this point for NATO to accept
Russian control of what was two years ago Ukrainian territory?

Vladimir Putin: I said let them think how to do it with dignity. There are options if there
is a will.

Up until now there has been the uproar and screaming about inflicting a strategic
defeat on Russia on the battlefield. Now they are apparently coming to realize that it is
difficult to achieve, if possible at all. In my opinion, it is impossible by definition, it is
never going to happen. It seems to me that now those who are in power in the West
have come to realize this as well. If so, if the realization has set in, they have to think
what to do next. We are ready for this dialogue.

Tucker Carlson: Would you be willing to say, “Congratulations, NATO, you won?”
And just keep the situation where it is now?
Vladimir Putin: You know, it is a subject for the negotiations no one is willing to conduct
or, to put it more accurately, they are willing but do not know how to do it. I know they
want. It is not just that I see it but I know they do want it but they are struggling
to understand how to do it. They have driven the situation to the point where we are at.
It is not us who have done that, it is our partners, opponents who have done that. Well,
now let them think how to reverse the situation. We are not against it.

It would be funny if it were not so sad. This endless mobilization in Ukraine,

the hysteria, the domestic problems – sooner or later it all will result in an agreement.
You know, this will probably sound strange given the current situation but the relations
between the two peoples will be rebuilt anyway. It will take a lot of time but they will
heal.

I will give you very unusual examples. There is a combat encounter on the battlefield, it
is a specific example: Ukrainian soldiers got encircled (this is an example from real life),
our soldiers were shouting to them: “There is no chance! Surrender yourselves! Come
out and you will be alive!” Suddenly the Ukrainian soldiers were shouting back
in Russian, perfect Russian: “Russians never surrender!” and all of them perished.
They still identify themselves as Russians.

What is happening is, to a certain extent, an element of a civil war. Everyone

in the West thinks that the Russian people have been split by hostilities forever. No.
They will be reunited. The unity is still there.

Why are the Ukrainian authorities dismantling the Ukrainian Orthodox Church?
Because it unites not the territory, it unites our souls. No one will be able to disunite
them.

Shall we end here or there is something else?

Tucker Carlson: Thank you, Mr. President.

Publication status Published in sections: News, Transcripts

Publication date: February 9, 2024, 07:00
Direct link: en.kremlin.ru/d/73411