IE Final Revision 2023
IE Final Revision 2023
anh)
Chap 10,11,13, (International Economic Cooperation)
6 essays: Chọn 2: 11 và 13
1. Bilateral and multilateral agreement: giữa 2 QG trở lên về 1 món hàng hoặc dịch vụ
2. Free Trade Agreement: Hiệp định giữa các thành viên về bãi bỏ thuế
3. Custom Union: liên minh thuế quan: FTA + đánh thuế chung với những nước không phải thành viên
4. Common market: Custom Union + labor, capital (không cần visa, giảm thuế khi đầu tư qua nước ngoài)
5. Economic Union: Common market + same currency
6. Politccal and Economic Union: Economic Union + Politcal
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
Chapter 10 - Chapter 13
E (GBP/USD)
21,780 22,000
CB’s action
E (VND/USD) appreciate> VND depreciate => Export (VN) increase, Import (VN) decrease
E (VND/USD) depreciate => VND appreciate=> Export decrease, Import increase
d. Crawling Peg Regime
- The Central Bank allows E to increase by less than a% every year. The a% is set by the Central
Bank.
- Applying when the country faces an increasing value of Import (IM) overtime.
e. Foreign Exchange Direct Control
- The Banking system announces the value of E every day. All the households and companies have
to follow.
- The Banking system controls the USDs. Companies and households are not allowed to buy and
sell USD directly.
- Problem: it leads to the establishment of two markets for USD: the official market for USD; the
Black Market for USD.
13. Measures to avoid or reduce the Foreign Exchange Risk
- From the example above: When E(VND/USD) = 22,000 , the profit to the importer is 2,000
VND per unit; When E1(VND/USD) = 23,000, the profit to the importer is 1,000 VND per unit.
Now after 3 months
- If pay USD immediately (within 2 days) to the foreign seller: the importer goes to the bank to buy
USD. The bank sells USD to him at a Spot Rate Eo: 1USD = 22,000 VND. Not risk to the
importer.
- What happens if the importer makes payment after 3 months? ➔ risk if E after 3 months is 1USD
= 23,000 VND.
- To avoid the risk the importer uses Derivatives Instruments (công cụ phái sinh). There are 4
derivatives instruments:
o Forward contracts
o Options
o Futures
o SWAP
Now 3 months
E1= 23,000 VND/USD
Eo= 22,000 VND/USD
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics Trả với tỉ giá FW contract
$1,000 = 22tr VND $1,000 = 23tr VND E = 22,600 VND/USD
(𝟏 + 𝒊∗ )
𝑭 = 𝑬𝒐 ×
(𝟏 + 𝒊)
e
E
F: exchange rate after one year
When the F - rate is used as the forward rate => Covered Interest Parity (CIP)
Example:
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
A person wants to deposit his saving of 10 million VND at a bank to earn interest income. He considers
two options:
If an importer signs a forward contract to buy USD with his bank, what will be the forward rate the bank
may offer to the importer?
If he deposits his saving at a VN bank, after one year he receives: 10,000,000 x ( 1+7%) = 10,700,000 VND
• If he deposits his saving at a bank in the United States, he has to take several steps:
10,000,000
• Step 1: He uses 10 million VND to buy USD and receives = 444.44 US dollars
22,500
10,000,000 VND x (1/22,500) USD/VND
• Step 2: He deposits 444.44 USD at a bank in the US. After 1 year, he receives
444.44 × (1 + 4%) = 462.22 US dollars
• The bank uses Covered Interest Rate Parity (CIP) to identify the Forward Rate Bank dùng
F - rate (exchange rate Eo sau 1 năm) khi kí hợp đồng Forward sẽ giúp cho việc gửi tiền
ở bên VN hay US đều nhận số tiền như nhau tránh được rủi ro của Exchange rate
$ => A$ => SFr => $ (1) Australian dollar/Swiss franc = A$ 1.1440/SFr 1.1440 A$/SFr
$ => SFr => A$ => $ (2)
a. Ignoring transaction costs, does Doug Bernard have an arbitrage opportunity
E (A$/$) = 1.8215
E (SFr/$) = 1.5971 SFr/$
E (A$/$) = E (A$/SFr) x E (SFr/$)
E (SFr/$) = E(SFr/A$) x E (A$/$) = (1/1.1440) x 1.8215=1.592 SFr/$
=1.1440 x 1.5971 = 1.8271
=> Arbitrage opportunity is possible
Arbitrage opportunity is possible
E ($/A$) = 1/(1.825) = 0.548 $/A$
E ($/A$) (thông qua SFr) = E($/SFr) x E (SFr/A$) = (1/1.5971) x (1/1.1440) = 0.547 $/A$
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
(2) $ => SFr => A$ => $
sell $1,000,000 to buy SFr: 1,000,000 USD x 1.5971 SFr/USD = 1,597,100 SFr
based on these quotes? sell 15,971,000 SFr to buy AUD: 1,597,100 SFr x 1.1440 (A$/SFr) = 1,827,082.4 A$
Profit = 3,064.7 USD sell 1,827,082.4A$ to buy USD: 1,827,082.4 A$ x (1/1.8215) ($/A$) = 1,003,064.7 USD
b. If there is an arbitrage opportunity, what steps would he take to make an arbitrage
profit, and how would he profit if he has $1,000,000 available for this purpose.
2. Consider the United States and the countries it trades with the most (measured in trade
volume): Canada, Mexico, China, and Japan. For simplicity, assume these are the only four
countries with which the United States trades. Trade shares and exchange rates for these four
countries are as follows:
NEER ($/CA$, Peso, Yuan, Yen) = %E($/CA$) x Trade share + ...
Country (currency) Share of Trade $ per FX in 2009 $ per FX in 2010
b. Use the trade shares as weights to compute the percentage change in the nominal effec-
tive exchange rate for the United States between 2009 and 2010 (in U.S. dollars per foreign
currency basket).
NEER (USD/CA$, Peso, yuan, yen) = Trade share (Canada) x %delta E($/CA$) + Trade share (Mexico) x %deltaE($/peso) +....
c. Based on your answer to (b), what happened to the value of the U.S. dollar against this
basket between 2009 and 2010? How does this compare with the change in the value of the
U.S. dollar relative to the Mexican peso? Explain your answer.
NEER (USD/CA$, Peso, yuan, yen) = 36% x 4.53%+28%x4.23%+20%x0.61%+16%x6.67% =4.01%
c. USD is depreciated by 4.01% against the basket between 2009 and 2010. USD is depreciated by 4.23% against Mexican peso.
The average depreciation of US against Chinese yuan is low (0.61%) and high trade share (20%) => Then, total effect is 4.01%
3. You are a financial adviser to a U.S. corporation that expects to receive a payment of 40
million Japanese yen in 180 days for goods exported to Japan. The current spot rate is 100
yen per U.S. dollar (E$/¥ = 0.01000). You are concerned that the U.S. dollar is going to
appreciate against the yen over the next six months.
a. Assuming the exchange rate remains unchanged, how much does your firm expect to
tương tự receive in U.S. dollars?
7 Chap 10
b. How much would your firm receive (in U.S. dollars) if the dollar appreciated to 110 yen
per U.S. dollar (E$/¥ = 0.00909)?
c. Describe how you could use an options contract to hedge against the risk of losses
associated with the potential appreciation in the U.S. dollar.
a. When exchange rate unchange:
Now Next Six months 40 million Yen x E($/Yen)
E ($/Yen) = 0.01 $/Yen USD appreciate => E ($/Yen) decrease = 40 million x 0.01 = $400,000
E($/Yen) =0.01 (câu a) $400,000
E($/Yen) = 0.00909 (câu b) $360,000
When dollar appreciate to 110 yen per USD:
40 million Yen x E($/Yen) = 40 million Yen x 0.00909 $/Yen= $360,000
When using option contracts, the firm is assumed to have the forward rate in option contract: E = 0.0095 $/Yen
+ If USD appreciate to 110 yen/USD (E$/Yen = 0.00909)=> Exercise option contract
=> Firm will receive 40 million Yen x 0.0095 $/Yen = $380,000
+ If USD unchange 100 yen/USD (E$/Yen = 0.01) => Do not exercise option contract
=> Firm will receive 40 million x 0.01 = $400,000 => But pay some additional cost
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
4. Consider a Dutch investor with 1,000 euros to place in a bank deposit in either the
Netherlands or Great Britain. The (one-year) interest rate on bank deposits is 2% in Britain
and 4.04% in the Netherlands. The (one-year) forward euro– pound exchange rate is 1.575
euros per pound and the spot rate is 1.5 euros per pound. Answer the following questions,
using the exact equations for UIP and CIP as necessary.
b. What is the (riskless) euro-denominated return on British deposits for this investor using
forward cover?
c. Is there an arbitrage opportunity here? Explain why or why not. Is this an equilib- rium in
the forward exchange rate market?
d. If the spot rate is 1.5 euros per pound, and interest rates are as stated previously, what is the
equilibrium forward rate, according to covered interest parity (CIP)?
e. Suppose the forward rate takes the value given by your answer to (d). Compute the forward
premium on the British pound for the Dutch investor (where exchange rates are in euros per
pound). Is it positive or negative? Why do investors require this pre- mium/discount in
equilibrium?
f. If uncovered interest parity (UIP) holds, what is the expected depreciation of the euro
(against the pound) over one year?
g. Based on your answer to (f ), what is the expected euro–pound exchange rate one year
ahead?
5. Assume you are a trader with Deutsche Bank. From the quote screen on your
computer terminal, you notice that Dresdner Bank is quoting €0.7627/$1.00 and Credit
Suisse is offering SF1.1806/$1.00. You learn that UBS is making a direct market
between the Swiss franc and the euro, with a current €/SF quote of .6395. Show how
you can make a triangular arbitrage profit by trading at these prices. (Ignore bid-ask
spreads for this problem.) Assume you have $5,000,000 with which to conduct the
arbitrage.
What happens if you initially sell dollars for Swiss francs? What €/SF price will
6. The current spot exchange rate is $1.95/£ and the three-month forward rate is $1.90/£. On
the basis of your analysis of the exchange rate, you are pretty confi- dent that the spot
exchange rate will be $1.92/£ in three months. Assume that you would like to buy or sell
£1,000,000.
a. What actions do you need to take to speculate in the forward market? What is the expected
dollar profit from speculation?
b. What would be your speculative profit in dollar terms if the spot exchange rate actually
turns out to be $1.86/£.
Chapter 11
Key assumptions:
Purchasing power parity (PPP): these overall price levels in each market must be the same.
Host/Foreign country
Absolute PPP Home country
e
∆E(VND/USD) E(VND/USD) - E(VND/USD)
= 𝑃𝑣𝑛
E(VND/USD) 𝐸𝑜 = E(VND/USD)=Pvn/Pus
E(VND/USD) 𝑃𝑢𝑠
Pvn,t Pvn,t-1
Relative PPP - (Pvn,t -Pvn,t-1) (Pus,t -Pus,t-1)
PUS,t PUS,t-1 -
= ∆𝐸(𝑉𝑁𝐷/𝑈𝑆𝐷), 𝑡 π (USD,t) Pvn,t-1 Pus,t-1
Pvn,t-1 = 𝜋𝑉𝑁𝐷,𝑡 − 𝜋𝐸𝑈𝑅,𝑡
PUS,t-1 𝐸(𝑉𝑁𝐷/𝑈𝑆𝐷), 𝑡
The relative price of basket of goods in Home Country compared to Host country =
Real exchange rate:
• If q>1: the price in VN is more expensive (VN goods are overvalued). More US goods
needed to exchange for VN goods. Exchange Rate Eo will adjust to increase to return
back to q=1=> VND will depreciate. USD will be appreciated.
0.5 = 50%
Pvn/ P(UsxEo) = q = 1.5
• => VND is overvalued by % (as Pvn>PusxEo) Pvn = 1.5 Pus x Eo
• If q<1: the price in VN is cheaper (VN goods are undervalued). Exchange Rate Eo will
adjust to reduce to return to q=1 => VND will appreciate. USD will depreciate.
0.2 = 20%
• => VND is undervalued by % (as Pvn<PusxEo)
q (US/VN) = 0.8 the basket of US/ the basket of VN
=> q increase back to 1 => E(VND/USD) decrease => USD depreciate => VND appreciate
=> E(USD/VND) increase => USD depreciate => VND appreciate
The percentage change in Exchange rate:
%∆𝐸 = 𝜋 ∗ − 𝜋
The PPP theory suggests that price levels in different countries and exchange rates are tightly
linked, either in levels or in rates of change.
The problem is that the PPP theory has several assumptions that are not in reality.
when we determine price levels, we must consider transaction costs, traded goods and
non-traded goods, tariffs, non-tariff barriers, market structures, foreign government
policies… which affect the price of goods across countries.
q(US/VN) = Pvn/ (Pus x Eo) = 215,000/ (25.1 x 22,000) = 0.4 the basket of US/ the basket of VN
q=0.4 < 1=> the price of VN is cheaper (VN goods are undervalued)=> VN goods are undervalued by 0.6 = 60% compared
to US goods. Due to LOOP, q increase back to 1=> Eo decrease => USD depreciate => VND appreciate
• Real depreciation (sự giảm sút trong sức mua của đồng VND).
• more VN goods are needed to exchange with the US goods ➔ the Nominal Exchange Rate Eo
will adjust to reduce so that q = 1 following the PPP theory: the price of goods in the basket must
be the same in the two countries.
• We can determine the PPP exchange rate Eo: Eo = Pvn/Pus = 215,000/25.1 = 8,565 VND/USD
• Stores of value
• Unit of account
• Medium of exchange
These expressions say that the price level P is determined by the ratio of nominal money
supplied M to nominal money demanded (LY).
𝜋 = %𝑀𝑆 − %𝑌
𝜋 = µ−𝑔
Problems
1. Suppose that two countries, Vietnam and Côte d’Ivoire, produce coffee. The currency unit used in
Vietnam is the dong (VND). Côte d’Ivoire is a member of Communauté Financière Africaine
(CFA), a currency union of West African countries that use the CFA franc (XOF). In Vietnam,
coffee sells for 5,000 dong (VND) per pound. The exchange rate is 30 VND per 1 CFA franc, E
VND/XOF = 30.
a. If the law of one price holds, what is the price of coffee in Côte d’Ivoire, measured in CFA
francs?
b. Assume the price of coffee in Côte d’Ivoire is actually 160 CFA francs per pound of coffee.
Compute the relative price of cof- fee in Côte d’Ivoire versus Vietnam. Where will coffee traders buy
coffee? Where will they sell coffee in this case? How will these transactions affect the price of coffee
in Vietnam? In Côte d’Ivoire
2. You are given the following information. The current dollar-pound exchange rate is $2 per pound.
A U.S. basket that costs $100 would cost $120 in the United Kingdom. For the next year, the Fed is
predicted to keep U.S. inflation at 2% and the Bank of England is predicted to keep U.K. inflation at
3%. The speed of convergence to absolute PPP is 15% per year.
3. This question uses the general monetary model, where L is no longer assumed constant, and money
demand is inversely related to the nominal interest rate. Consider the same scenario described at the
beginning of the previous question. In addition, the bank deposits in Japan pay a 3% interest rate, i¥ =
3%.
b. Using the definition of the real interest rate (nominal interest rate adjusted for inflation), show that
the real interest rate in Korea is equal to the real interest rate in Japan. (Note that the inflation rates
you computed in the previous question will be the same in this question.)
c. Suppose the Bank of Korea increases the money growth rate from 12% to 15% and the inflation
rate rises proportionately (one for one) with this increase. If the nominal interest rate in Japan remains
unchanged, what happens to the interest rate paid on Korean deposits?
4. Use the table that follows to answer this question. Treat the country listed as the home country and
treat the United States as the foreign country. Suppose the cost of the mar- ket basket in the United
States is PUS = $190. Check to see whether PPP holds for each of the countries listed, and determine
whether we should expect a real appreciation or real depre- ciation for each country (relative to the
United States) in the long run. For the answer, create a table similar to the one shown and fill in the
blank cells. (Hint: Use a spreadsheet applica- tion such as Excel.)
5. You are given the following information. The current dollar-pound exchange rate is $2 per pound. A U.S.
basket that costs $100 would cost $120 in the United Kingdom. For the next year, the Fed is predicted to
keep U.S. inflation at 2% and the Bank of England is predicted to keep U.K. inflation at 3%. The speed of
convergence to absolute PPP is 15% per year.
a. What is the expected U.S. minus U.K. inflation differential for the coming year?
b. What is the current U.S. real exchange rate qUS/UK with the United Kingdom?
c. How much is the dollar overvalued/under- valued?
d. What do you predict the U.S. real exchange rate with the United Kingdom will be in one year’s time?
e. What is the expected rate of real depre- ciation for the United States (versus the United Kingdom)?
f. What is the expected rate of nominal depre- ciation for the United States (versus the United Kingdom)?
g. What do you predict will be the dollar price of one pound a year from now?
7. This question uses the general monetary model, in which money demand is inversely related tothe
nominal interest rate, L(i). Consider two countries, Japan and Korea. In 1996, Japan
experienced relatively slow output (income) growth, 1%, whereas Korea had relatively robustoutput
growth, 4%. Suppose the Bank of Japan allowed the money supply to grow by 2% eachyear, where as
the Bank of Korea chose to maintain relatively high money growth of 8% per year.Treat Korea as the
home country and Japan as the foreign country. In addition, the bank deposits in Japan pay 3%
interest; i¥ = 3%.
a. Calculate the interest rate paid on Korean deposits.
b. Using the definition of the real interest rate (nominal interest rate adjusted for inflation), showthat
the real interest rate in Korea is equal to the real interest rate in Japan. (Note that theinflation rates you
calculated in the previous question will apply here.)
c. Suppose the Bank of Korea increases the money growth rate from 8% to 11% and the
inflation rate rises proportionately (one for one) with this increase. If the nominal interest rate in Japan
remains unchanged, what happens to the interest rate paid on Korean deposits
d. Suppose Korean economy slowed down. The output growth rate became 2% with 8% for the money
growth rate in Korea. i) If the nominal interest rate in Japan remains unchanged, what happens to the
interest rate paid on Korean deposits
e. Suppose the Bank of Japan increases the money growth rate from 2% to 6% and the inflationrate
rises proportionately (one for one) with this increase. What happens to the interest rate paid on
Japanese deposits?
a. Fisher effect:
i(k) - i(j) = π(k)-π(j)
Md/P = L(i)xY
i(k) - 3% = 4% -1%
g =4% i(j) = 3% => i (k) = 6%
k
g(j) = 1%
µ(j)=2% π (k) = µ(k) - g(k)= 8%-4% =4%
µ(k)=8% π (j) = µ(j) -g(j) = 2% - 1% = 1%
e. µ(j) =6%
π(j)=?
i (j) =?
6. Consider two countries: Japan and Korea. In 1996 Japan experienced relatively slow out- put growth
(1%), while Korea had relatively robust output growth (6%). Suppose the Bank of Japan allowed the
money supply to grow by 2% each year, while the Bank of Korea chose to maintain relatively high money
growth of 12% per year.
For the following questions, use the simple monetary model (where L is constant). You will find it easiest to
treat Korea as the home coun- try and Japan as the foreign country.
a. What is the inflation rate in South Korea? In Japan?
b. What is the expected rate of depreciation in the Korean won relative to the Japanese yen (¥)?
c. Suppose the Bank of Korea decreases the money growth rate from 15% to 12%. If nothing in Japan
changes, what is the new inflation rate in Korea?
d. Suppose the Bank of Korea wants to maintain an exchange rate peg with the Japanese yen. What
money growth rate would the Bank of Korea have to choose to keep the value of the won fixed relative to
the yen?
e. Suppose the Bank of Korea sought to implement policy that would cause the Korean won to appreciate
relative to the Japanese yen. What ranges of the money growth rate (assumingpositive values) would allow
the Bank of Korea to achieve this objective?
5. You are given the following information. The current dollar-pound exchange rate is $2 per pound.
A U.S. basket that costs $100 would cost 60 pound in the United Kingdom. For the next year, the Fed is
predicted to keep U.S. inflation at 2% and the Bank of England is predicted to keep U.K. inflation at 3%. The
speed of convergence to absolute PPP is 15% per year.
a. What is the expected U.S. minus U.K. inflation differential for the coming year?
b. What is the current U.S. real exchange rate qUS/UK with the United Kingdom?
c. How much is the dollar overvalued/under- valued?
d. What do you predict the U.S. real exchange rate with the United Kingdom will be in one year’s time?
e. What is the expected rate of real depreciation for the United States (versus the United Kingdom)?
f. What is the expected rate of nominal depreciation for the United States (versus the United Kingdom)?
g. What do you predict will be the dollar price of one pound a year from now?
E ($/pound) = 2 $/pound
π(us) = 2%
Pus = $100
π (uk)= 3%
Puk = 60 pound
b. q(US/UK) =[ Puk x E ($/pound) ]/Pus =(60 pound x $2 /pound)/$100= $120/$100=1.2 the basket of US/ the basket of UK
"1 giỏ hàng hoá của UK đổi được 1.2 giỏ hàng hoá của US)
UK is overvalued
c. USD is undervalued by (1.2 - 1= 0.2 = 20%)
d. q(US/UK) = 1.2
LOOP: q decrease back to 1 => Decrease by 20%
The speed of convergence to absolute PPP is 15% of 20% => 15% x 20%=0.03
=> q(US/UK) in one year's time = 1.2 - 0.03 = 1.17
e. -0.03 x Pus/PukxE = -0.03 x 100/120 = -2.5% => The real depreciation is 2.5%
f. nominal depreciation = real depreciation + inflation differential = -2.5% - 1% = -3.5%
g. E($/pound) = $2/pound x (1-3.5%) = $1.93/pound
q(US/UK) = [Puk x E($/pound)] / Pus
q(US/UK) = 1 (LOOP)
Puk x E($/pound) /Pus= 1
E ($/pound) = Pus/Puk = 100/60 =1.67
E decrease by -16.5% (1.67 - 2)/2 x 100=-16.5%
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
Chapter 13
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
When a country opens to the world economy, there are various transactions between the citizens
of the country and the rest of the world.
Some transactions cause inflows of USD into the country and others cause outflows of USD out
of the country.
Example: Export causes an inflow of USD into the country because the exporters receive
payments in USD from foreign buyers. Vice versa, Import causes an outflow of USD to foreign
coutries because the importers pay USD for the goods they buy from abroad.
Thus, at the end of a year, if total inflows of USD are higher than the total outflows of USD, the
country is better off and its foreign reserves (USD) increase. The country becomes richer.
And if the total inlfows of USD are lower than the total outflows of USD, the country’s foreign
reserves reduce and the country becomes worse off in international business activities.
• Therefore, the country needs an accounting book recording all transactions that cause inflows
and outflows of USD. This accounting book is called “Balance of Payments” or BoP.
• Definition: Balance of Payments (BoP) is an accounting book that records all transactions
between the citizens of a country and the rest of the world in a certain period of time.
• Rule of recording:
• A transaction which causes an inflow of USD into a country is recorded as a Credit or with a
“+” value.
• A transaction which causes an outflow of USD out of a country is recorded as a Debit or with
a “-” value.
• Example: Export value of 120,000 USD is recorded as a Credit with + 120,000 USD.
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
+EX -IM
Financial Accounts record all Paying cash to abroad Receiving cash from abroad
(FA) - (Home and financial (export of assets) – Cash (import of assets)- Cash
Foreign Assets) transactions in reduces increases
cash assets
Account Receivables
Account Payables
-IM(A)
+EX(A)
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
C: Consumption (individuals)
I: Investment (business)
G: government spending
EX - IM
GNE = C+ I + G
GDP = C+I+G+TB
GNI = GDP + NFIA
GNDI = GNI +NUT
=GNE + CA
EX(FS) - IM(FS)
GNDI + FA + KA = GNE
GNE + CA +FA+KA
= GNE
=> CA+ FA+ KA =0
+UTin -UTout
CA = TB + NFIA + NUT
GNE = C+I+G
GDP = GNE + (EX - IM) = C+I+G+TB=C+I+G+(EX-IM)
GNI = GDP + NFIA = C + I +G + TB + NFIA
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
=> CA + KA + FA = 0
• Due to double entry book keeping, we always have total credits = total debits:
CA + KA + FA + EO = 0
• However: BoP = CA + K + EO
• If BoP > 0 in a period: BoP Surplus, which also means that USD Foreign Reserves of the country
increase. The country is better off. It can use this surplus to pay national debts or lend to other
countries.
• If BoP < 0 in a period: BoP Deficit, which also means that USD Foreign Reserves of the country
reduce. The country is worse off.
Example:
3. The US Government grants an ODA of 500,000 USD to Cambodia to help them fight Covid
Pandemic.
CA: Unilateral transfer out -$500,000
FA: Cash reduces +$500,000
4. Ford Corp. sells 100 cars to Vietnam buyers. 4,000,000$
5. An U.S. citizen bought stocks issued by a New Zealand Corp.. $6,000. The New Zealand company
deposits in its own U.S. bank account in San Francisco. How is this transaction is recorded in the US
Balance of Payments?
KA: Outflow of FPI -$6,000
FA: Paying cash to abroad +$6,000
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
• Surpluses and deficits can be counted for individul accounts in the BoP.
• Current Account (CA) Surplus (net lenders) v.s Currrent Account (CA) Deficits (net borrowers)
• Current Account Surplus means inflow of USD cash into the country is higher than the outflow of
USD cash. The country can use its surplus to reduce the national debts or to lend to other
countries (the country becomes the net lender). .
• Current Account Deficit means inflow of USD cash into the country is lower than the outflow of
USD cash. The country should find ways to reduce the national debts or to borrow more from
other countries to finance for the deficit (the country becomes the net borrower).
• Capital Account (K) Surplus means the country possess more international/ foreign capital assets
of other countries. The country’s stock of international/ foreign capital indebtedness increases.
• Capital Account (K) Deficit means other countries possess more of the country’s capital assets.
The country’s stock of international capital indebtedness reduces.
• Increasing Export
• Restricting Import
Problems:
1. Note the following accounting identity for gross national income (GNI):
GNI = C+I+G+TB+NFIA
Using this expression, show that in a closed economy, gross domestic product (GDP), grosss national
income (GNI), gross national expenditures (GNE) are the same. Show that domestic investment is
equal to domestic savings
Trần Đức Thành - TA International Economics
4. How do you record the following transactions into the US. Balance of Payments (BoP) in 2020?
1. A Japanese investor bought stocks of American Airlines Corp. It is worth $45,000, in cash.
2. The US companies bought catfish from a company Vietnam. 234,000 USD. Payment willbe made after 3
months.
3. GM Corporation has decided to invest 1,354,000 USD in Vietnam.
4. Laos received 3,230,000 USD of ODA from the Unites States.
5. Vietnamese overseas sent ther part of income to their relatives in Vietmam. 456,000 USD. In cash.
GOOD LUCK!!!
US BOP Debit Credit
KA: Inflow of FPI +$45,000
FA: Receiving from abroad
-$45,000
4. How do you record the following transactions into the US. Balance of Payments (BoP) in 2020?
1. A Japanese investor bought stocks of American Airlines Corp. It is worth $45,000, in cash.
2. The US companies bought catfish from a company Vietnam. 234,000 USD. Payment will be made after 3 months.
3. General Motor Corporation has decided to invest 1,354,000 USD in Vietnam.
4. Laos received 3,230,000 USD of ODA from the Unites States.
5. Vietnamese overseas sent ther part of income to their relatives in Vietnam. 456,000 USD. In cash.
Debit Credit
2. US BOP
-$234,000
CA: import of goods
FA: paying cash to VN (Account payable) +$234,000