BPC---July-2021
BPC---July-2021
BPC---July-2021
of the
A meeting of the British Pharmacopoeia Commission was held via videoconference on Monday
5th July 2021.
BPC Appointments Professor Taylor’s second term as Chair had been extended for one
year until 30th September 2022.
BPC Appraisals The Chair thanked members for participating in the appraisals process
which had been undertaken by correspondence.
I MINUTES
461 The minutes of the meeting held on 15th March 2021 were confirmed.
462 The following matters arising from the meeting held on 15th March 2021 were noted.
Minute 441 – Working Party ATMP: Progress Report The draft Guidance on the
Application of Flow Cytometry for the Cell and Gene Therapy Community had been
published on the BP website in April.
1
Minute 444 – BPCRS Principles, Availability and Strategy Discussions were ongoing
within the Secretariat to ensure that a harmonised approach relating to BPCRS was
presented at future EAG meetings.
GOVERNANCE
Mr Pound provided an update on how the BP and MHRA were responding to the global
Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and other key issues.
OPERATIONAL
The first meeting of the new Expert Advisory Group PCN, formed by merging the existing
Pharmacy and Nomenclature EAGs, had been held on 30th June. Professor Jeffrey
Aronson (former Chair of EAG NOM) had taken on the role of Chair and Mr Robert Lowe
had agreed to act as Vice-Chair. Dr Rodney Horder (former Chair of EAG PCY) had agreed
to remain on the EAG in view of his continuing role as Chair of Ph Eur Group 12: Dosage
Forms and Methods. The meeting had been very successful and had included several
agenda items that would previously have been discussed separately by both EAG NOM
and EAG PCY.
Current BP Policy The current policy relating to monograph titles for BP formulated
preparation monographs was that the shortest title combining the name of the active moiety
and the appropriate standard term should be used. Where the active ingredient was in the
form of a salt, this was usually omitted from the title unless the same dosage form was
available containing more than one form of the same active substance, for example both
base and salt forms. It was noted that BP monograph titles were referenced in the British
National Formulary (BNF) and in the Dictionary of Medicines and Devices and were used
by the MHRA as the basis for naming generic medicines.
Future BP Policy In light of the recently adopted Ph Eur policy, members were invited to
discuss the approach for future BP monographs. It was agreed that the current policy for
BP monographs should be retained and that approved synonyms should be created for
future Ph Eur monographs reproduced in the BP (as required). This approach would cause
the least confusion for users and the use of approved synonyms was already well-
established for instances where the BP adopted a different title from the Ph Eur for an
active substance monograph.
2
After further discussion it was agreed the situation should be kept under review as the
number of Ph Eur product monographs increased.
Introduction The working practices and governance of the BP Commission and the
Secretariat had been examined against the current Code of Practice for Scientific Advisory
Committees and taking note of the Rules Governing the Proceedings of the British
Pharmacopoeia Commission. It was noted that the Code of Practice provided a general
guidance framework relating to the establishment, management and conduct of the
committees to which it applied. It was up to the relevant sponsoring organisations and
committees to determine the best approach for their particular situation.
Review of current Guidance Members were provided with the findings from the review,
which had demonstrated that the BPC operated in accordance with the guidance. The
review highlighted the current position for the BPC and included some proposals for minor
changes and improvements.
A summary of the comments received during the lessons learned workshop held after the
March meeting, together with comments provided by those members who were unable to
attend in person, was provided for information. The consensus was that most aspects of
the work relating to the BP Commission were operating well and several suggestions and
recommendations for improvement had been made.
General points The points raised related to the usual BPC/EAG business and ways of
working. Some issues were already being addressed such as providing additional
information on the website, providing clarity around members’ interests and introducing a
regular review of monographs.
Guidance At the last meeting it had been agreed that it would be helpful if further
guidance could be provided relating to interests held by members of the BP Commission
and the Expert Advisory Groups, Panels of Experts and Working Parties.
Additional information and guidance had been prepared together with some examples of
types of interest that might be declared and recommendations for the approach to take
during meetings.
Members welcomed the additional clarification and guidance provided and it was agreed
that the list of examples would be helpful for both Chairs and members.
The Commission was updated on recent Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) activities
relating to the three strategic areas identified in the MHRA AQbD strategy document.
3
Supporting and Enabling Innovation It was intended that further practical evaluations
would be carried out and the Secretariat were planning a collaborative study using the
Analytical Target Profile approach.
Application to Public Quality Standards The AQbD Working Party had initiated a joint
project between the Secretariat and the BP Laboratory investigating the adoption of AQbD
principles to Related substances tests and different formulations. The joint project would be
used to demonstrate how applying the principles of AQbD could be used to develop
improved and robust methods but without causing unnecessary burden to the Laboratory.
Supplementary Chapter The new Supplementary Chapter had been included in the BP
2022 and the expectation was that it would be regularly updated in future publications.
A large number of comments had been received on the draft text and the following major
changes had been made: the title had been changed to “Supplementary Chapter on the
use of Analytical Quality by Design concepts for Analytical Procedures” in order to highlight
that the chapter was for guidance purposes and to be in line with ICH; the order of the
various sections had been changed for clarity; reference to the existing guidance in
Appendix III: Chromatographic Separation Techniques had been included.
The Supplementary Chapter emphasized the non-mandatory nature of the guidance and
would be regularly updated to reflect any changes.
Members were provided with an update on recent projects being undertaken by the joint
BP-TSO Innovation Board.
Revision History The “Revision History” feature had been incorporated into monographs
that had been revised in the British Pharmacopoeia 2022. This was linked to the existing
track-changes feature and provided a short statement indicating the reason for the change
to specific monograph tests.
OKO User Research The fourth round of user research had been completed in April and a
summary of the key findings was presented. In addition to the targeted research a further
survey had been sent out to users.
Several key areas identified from the combined research included: the wish for more direct
contact with the BP; the value of increased international collaborations; suggestions to
increase the profile of the BP within the healthcare system and to align with developments
in the industry and healthcare sector through innovative areas of work. In addition, users
would welcome the means to personalise the online version, enabling rapid access to
frequently used areas of the site, they would also welcome tailored alerts to matters of
4
interest and the availability of other formats. There was a decreasing use of the hard copy
publication, although it was still used in some countries.
Members supported the proposed areas for future development and were asked to provide
any suggestions for future areas of research to the Secretariat.
British Pharmacopoeia Laboratory Reports The list of reports concerning new and
revised monographs that had been prepared by the Laboratory since the March 2021
meeting was provided for information.
IV FUTURE PUBLICATIONS
The Secretariat had proposed two statements which were intended to alert the user to the
potential risk of nitrosamine impurities in specific drug substances and products, but without
creating additional burden to industry. These had been provided to Licensing colleagues on
the MHRA’s Nitrosamine Incident Management Team as it was critical that the BP was
aligned with Licensing on this matter. Members were invited to discuss the proposals.
There was no perceived difference in the risk to the patient whichever approach was
adopted and members agreed that including a Production statement in individual
monographs was preferred over placing reliance on compliance with general monograph
statements.
The Secretariat would be carrying out a short consultation in the autumn. This would allow
sufficient time to make any changes required to reflect the latest situation and to include the
statements in relevant monographs in the BP 2023.
V ANALYTICAL ISSUES
Introduction Several comments had been raised about the suitability of including tests for
Water or Loss on Drying in monographs for formulated preparations. Such attributes were
important for individual products but the value of including a generic requirement in a BP
monograph was questioned, particularly in cases where wide limits were required to
encompass all available licensed products.
Members agreed that although tests for Water and Loss on Drying had previously been
included in some formulation monographs, they should not be included routinely. However,
5
it was recognised that there could be exceptional circumstances where inclusion of a test
was justified, for example if the active ingredient was hygroscopic, if water was used during
the later stages of synthesis or due to the nature of the formulation. The Secretariat
undertook to develop suitable policy guidelines with the default position that such tests
should not usually be included.
The Aide Memoire and Policy List were due to be updated by the end of the year. The
Secretariat had identified several areas in the current guidance documents that should be
updated to reflect new or amended policies and members were asked to identify any other
aspects that should be addressed in the review. The Secretariat would provide draft
updated versions for comment during the next few months with a view to providing finalised
versions at the November meeting.
The report of the EAG PCY meeting (29:05:20) was approved. This had been the final
meeting of EAG PCY. Ongoing issues would be addressed within the newly formed EAG
PCN: Pharmacy and Nomenclature in due course (minute 464 refers).
476 Expert Advisory Group HCM: Herbal and Complementary Medicines COM(21)31
The report of the EAG HCM meeting (01:02:21) was approved. The EAG had received
progress reports on several items and had reviewed the updated work programme.
Monographs for herbal extracts had been prioritised for future work.
The report of the EAG ABS meeting (04:03:21) was approved and the following points were
raised.
Oxytetracycline Preparations The EAG had questioned retention of the test for Light-
absorbing impurities following inclusion of Related substances tests in these monographs.
This would be considered as part of a wider review of monograph tests.
Ciprofloxacin Preparations; Titles The title of the new monograph for Ciprofloxacin
Hydrochloride Eye Drops (licensed) had included the full name of the active ingredient in
the title in order to distinguish it from the existing monograph for Ciprofloxacin Eye Drops
(unlicensed) which contained Ciprofloxacin (as the lactate).
The report of the EAG MC2 meeting (05:05:21 and 07:05:21) was approved and the
following points were raised.
6
Liothyronine Tablets; Related substances The EAG had discussed whether the high
limit proposed by a company for Maillard impurities (impurities formed by reaction of the
active ingredient with lactose present in the formulation) was justified, together with the
need to ensure that the wide limits did not encourage poor practices in products where the
impurity did not form.
Mebeverine Tablets; Dissolution One product had been unable to comply with the
proposed limits for dissolution and it had been agreed that a more discriminatory test was
required in order to avoid a test with very wide limits.
Solifenacin Preparations; Identification It had been agreed that better guidance on how
to decide whether infrared spectra were concordant or not should be provided.
Diclofenac Gel The current monograph had been expanded to cover formulations
prepared from either Diclofenac Diethylamine or Diclofenac Sodium. A statement had been
added at the head of the draft revised monograph highlighting that the two formulations
were not interchangeable.
European Pharmacopoeia Commission Members discussed items from the 169th and
170th Sessions of the EP Commission and advised the UK Delegation accordingly.
United States Pharmacopeia A teleconference with the USP had been held in May to
discuss areas of mutual interest, including informal harmonisation projects for finished
product monographs, standards for digital therapeutics, Analytical Quality by Design &
method lifecycle and the pharmacopoeial response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chinese Pharmacopoeia Comments were awaited from China on the draft Memorandum
of Understanding between the BP and the Chinese Pharmacopoeia.
7
partnership should support increased technical understanding and exchange of information
between the two organisations.
Croatian Pharmacopoeia The Co-operation Agreement between the BP and the Croatian
Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, which allowed the Croatian
Pharmacopoeia to reproduce the BP general text on Unlicensed Medicines in their
publication, had been extended until March 2026.
Regular meetings between representatives from the IMWP (International Meeting of World
Pharmacopoeias) were still being held. Draft monographs for Favipiravir and Favipiravir
Tablets (potential treatment for COVID-19) had been posted on the WHO website for
comment and this had been highlighted on the BP website.
A member highlighted the recent statement issued by the European Food Safety Authority
(EFSA) which stated that titanium dioxide was no longer considered safe when used as a
food additive due to concerns over potential genotoxic effects. Although this statement
specifically related to food grade material there could be implications for pharmaceutical
grade material which was used in over 6000 licensed medicines to boost opacity and
whiteness. There would be a huge impact on the industry if companies had to remove the
material from their products and patients might become concerned if the appearance of
established products changed.
FOR INFORMATION:
An updated list of items for discussion at future meetings was provided for information.