Strategic Management
Strategic Management
UNIT-2
STRATEGIC POSITION
Components Of External Environment
Here are the nine types of external environment factors that affect businesses:
1. Technological factors
As technology continues to advance, companies can benefit from these breakthroughs or face
challenges in competing with them. For example, a company that manufactures GPS devices
for personal cars may experience a decline in business because of the integration of GPS on
mobile devices, but they can confront these challenges by developing new products. Other
companies, such as health care providers, can use modernized methods to collect information
from their patients, keep patient records and streamline patient care.
2. Economic factors
The state of the economy plays an important role in every aspect of daily life from the well-
being of personnel to the ability of a company to thrive. When the economy trends downward
and unemployment rises, businesses may have to work harder to keep their staff and change
their processes to continue earning revenue. If the company produces products for retail sale,
for instance, they may consider lowering the price to increase sales and positively affect their
revenue.
5. Social factors
Where people live, their personal values and their socioeconomic status affect what, where
and why people make purchases. Businesses take social factors into consideration when
developing and marketing products, and many use current events, movements and social
issues to appeal to their customers. For example, a company that supports a women's
organization may earn the trust and loyalty of customers who identify as female. Catering to
the specific preferences and expectations of underrepresented groups, who have more
influence on the market today than in past years, can also contribute to customer satisfaction
and business growth.
6. Competitive factors
Businesses can increase their market share and stay relevant to their customers by keeping
track of their competitors. They can identify and evaluate successes and challenges, thus
learning what to incorporate into their own processes and how to prevent revenue loss. They
can also use the information they gather to develop ideas for product changes, product
relaunches and new product development.
7. Global factors
Executives have a duty to keep track of both domestic and global issues, especially if they
conduct business internationally. By learning about social issues that affect those in other
countries and their cultural norms, consumer trends and economic status, company leaders
can provide their teams with relevant training. This enables them to develop products or offer
services that meet the needs of international customers by providing solutions to challenges
they face as consumers.
8. Ethical factors
Because each individual has a distinct concept of ethics and morality, some companies may
find it challenging to balance the personal lives of staff members with their expectations in
the workplace. Employees' leisure activities, such as social media accounts, can reflect on
their employer. As representatives of the company, they have a responsibility to avoid
behavior that could negatively affect the business. Managers can address issues such as
sharing classified information or the harassment of a colleague outside of work by
establishing guidelines and taking disciplinary action when necessary.
9. Natural factors
As environmental awareness continues to grow, more consumers have realized the effects of
business processes on the planet. Some consumers have used their purchases to support
companies that develop ecologically friendly practices, such as using compostable packaging
and solar energy. By paying attention to these external concerns and changing their
operations, businesses can make changes that help them protect the environment, retain
customers and increase revenue.
The five forces mentioned above are very significant from point of view of strategy
formulation. The potential of these forces differs from industry to industry. These forces
jointly determine the profitability of industry because they shape the prices which can be
charged, the costs which can be borne, and the investment required to compete in the
industry. Before making strategic decisions, the managers should use the five forces
framework to determine the competitive structure of industry.
Let’s discuss the five factors of Porter’s model in detail:
1. Risk of entry by potential competitors: Potential competitors refer to the firms
which are not currently competing in the industry but have the potential to do so if
given a choice. Entry of new players increases the industry capacity, begins a
competition for market share and lowers the current costs. The threat of entry by
potential competitors is partially a function of extent of barriers to entry. The various
barriers to entry are-
Economies of scale
Brand loyalty
Government Regulation
Customer Switching Costs
Absolute Cost Advantage
Ease in distribution
Strong Capital base
2. Rivalry among current competitors: Rivalry refers to the competitive struggle for
market share between firms in an industry. Extreme rivalry among established firms
poses a strong threat to profitability. The strength of rivalry among established firms
within an industry is a function of following factors:
Extent of exit barriers
Amount of fixed cost
Competitive structure of industry
Presence of global customers
Absence of switching costs
Growth Rate of industry
Demand conditions
3. Bargaining Power of Buyers: Buyers refer to the customers who finally consume the
product or the firms who distribute the industry’s product to the final consumers.
Bargaining power of buyers refer to the potential of buyers to bargain down the prices
charged by the firms in the industry or to increase the firms cost in the industry by
demanding better quality and service of product. Strong buyers can extract profits out
of an industry by lowering the prices and increasing the costs. They purchase in large
quantities. They have full information about the product and the market. They
emphasize upon quality products. They pose credible threat of backward integration.
In this way, they are regarded as a threat.
4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Suppliers refer to the firms that provide inputs to
the industry. Bargaining power of the suppliers refer to the potential of the suppliers
to increase the prices of inputs( labour, raw materials, services, etc) or the costs of
industry in other ways. Strong suppliers can extract profits out of an industry by
increasing costs of firms in the industry. Suppliers products have a few substitutes.
Strong suppliers’ products are unique. They have high switching cost. Their product is
an important input to buyer’s product. They pose credible threat of forward
integration. Buyers are not significant to strong suppliers. In this way, they are
regarded as a threat.
5. Threat of Substitute products: Substitute products refer to the products having
ability of satisfying customers needs effectively. Substitutes pose a ceiling (upper
limit) on the potential returns of an industry by putting a setting a limit on the price
that firms can charge for their product in an industry. Lesser the number of close
substitutes a product has, greater is the opportunity for the firms in industry to raise
their product prices and earn greater profits (other things being equal).
The power of Porter’s five forces varies from industry to industry. Whatever be the industry,
these five forces influence the profitability as they affect the prices, the costs, and the capital
investment essential for survival and competition in industry. This five forces model also help
in making strategic decisions as it is used by the managers to determine industry’s
competitive structure.
Porter ignored, however, a sixth significant factor- complementaries. This term refers to the
reliance that develops between the companies whose products work is in combination with
each other. Strong complementors might have a strong positive effect on the industry. Also,
the five forces model overlooks the role of innovation as well as the significance of
individual firm differences. It presents a stagnant view of competition.
UNIT-1