Esforço -Completa
Esforço -Completa
Esforço -Completa
v07.0
New or
release Actor Main Alternative Exception Complexity
Application Change
Id Use Case name
1 EXTRATO CONTA CORRENTE new Person 1 9 1 complex
10 Concurrent 1 low 2 2
Is the customer looking at large number of users working with locking
support? This will increase the architecture complexity and hence this value.
Includes security features
11 Is the customer looking at having heavy security like SSL? Or do we have to 1 none 0 0
write custom code logic for encryption?
Provides access for third parties
Does the project depends on using third party controls? For understanding
12 the third-party controls and studying its pros and cons, is there any 1 none 0 0
considerable effort that will be required? So, this factor should be rated
accordingly.
Special user training facilities are required
13 Will the software from the user perspective be so complex that a separated 1 average 3 3
training has to be provided? So this factor will vary accordingly.
TFactor 15
TCF - Technical Complexity Factor = ( 0,6 + ( 0,01 * TFator ) ) 0.75
Project : <enter project name> v07.0
Environment
Enviroment Factor Assessment Weigth Influence value
Factor
Familiarity with RBPM
01 1.5 none 0 0
Application experience
02 0.5 none 0 0
How much is knows the application objectives?
Object-oriented experience
As use-case documents are inputs to object oriented design, it's
03 important that people working on the project have basic 1 none 0 0
knowledge of OOP concepts.
Lead analyst capability
04 How is the analyst who is leading the project? Does he have 0.5 none 0 0
enough knowledge of the problem domain?.
Motivation
Are the programmers motivated for working on the project?
05 Instability in the project will always lead to people leaving half 1 none 0 0
way through their source code. And the hand over becomes
really tough.
Stable requirements
Is the user clear about what he wants? I have seen clients'
06 expectations are the most important factor in the stability of 2 low 2 4
requirements. If the client is from a highly changing nature, put
this value to maximum.
Part-time workers
07 -1 average 3 -3
Are there part-time staff on the project, like consultants etc.?
Difficult programming language
08 How much is the language complexity, Assembly, VB 6.0, C++ -1 very high 5 -5
and C or Framework?
Efactor -4
EF - Enviroment Factor = ( 1,4 + ( -0,03 * Efactor) ) 1.52
Use Case Point Capacity Planning UseCasePoint
v07.0 Project : <enter project name>
UseCase Point
Release : 1 <enter release name >
Functional
Item new Change Weight Complexity UUCP
Complexity
Actor time - - 1 - 3.0
system - - 2 -
person 1 - 3 3.0
Use Case Simple - - 5 - 15.0
Medium - - 10 -
Complex 1 - 15 15.0
UUCP - Unadjusted Use Case Point 18.0
Ajusted Use Case Point factor
RF - REQUIREMENT FACTOR: Represents the estimatives' accuracy level from
the Use Cases and Interface lists, totally 1.000
and requirements stability (change request) factor.
TCF - Technical Complexity Factor: Is the solution going to use a new
0.750
technology within the IT?
EF - Enviroment Factor: Has the development team experience on the
1.520
application or technology that will be used (new and existent ones)?
UCP = UUCP * AF * TCF * EF 20.52
RBPM - effort distribution Productivity IT Management Effort Team Effort Team (FTE) Schedule
activity Project Supply Time Pre
man man team man man LAG start finish duration
id Release id Phase Activity adjust effort Mgnt Mgnt IT Dev ITO User Line Activity
hour month rate hour month (month) date date (workday)
(man.hour) rate rate (month) id
Management Project & Supply Mgmt 41.04 0.31 15/8/24 #ADDIN?
001 Initial Request & Review 100% 12.31 10% 1.23 0.01 90% 11.08 0.08 1 0.2 0.5 0.05 15/8/24 #ADDIN? 1.04
Initiation
002 Prioritisation 100% 0.82 10% 0.08 0.00 90% 0.74 0.01 1 0.5 0.00 0.50 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.08
003 0 Terms of Engagement 100% 0.82 10% 0.08 0.00 90% 0.74 0.01 1 0.2 0.00 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.10
004 Requirement Impact Analysis 100% 1.23 10% 0.12 0.00 90% 1.11 0.01 1 0.5 0.01 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.12
005 Viability 100% 1.23 10% 0.12 0.00 90% 1.11 0.01 1 0.5 0.01 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.12
<enter release name > UCP 20.52
106 Requirement Requirements Gathering 100% 41.04 10% 4.10 0.03 90% 36.94 0.28 1 0.5 0.19 003 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 3.92
107 Analysis Analysis 100% 20.52 10% 2.05 0.02 90% 18.47 0.14 1 0.1 0.13 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 2.67
108 Design Design 100% 20.52 10% 2.05 0.02 90% 18.47 0.14 1 0.1 0.13 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 2.67
109 Tech & User Documentation 100% 8.21 10% 0.82 0.01 90% 7.39 0.06 1 0.06 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 1.18
110 Build Rules & Coding 100% 102.60 10% 10.26 0.08 90% 92.34 0.70 1 0.70 108 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 14.69
111 Unit Test & Unit Integr Test 100% 73.87 10% 7.39 0.06 90% 66.48 0.50 1 0.50 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 10.58
112 1 Sys Test & Sys Integr Test 100% 61.56 10% 6.16 0.05 90% 55.40 0.42 1 0.42 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 8.81
113 Test User Acceptance Test 100% 20.52 10% 2.05 0.02 90% 18.47 0.14 0.1 1 0.13 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 2.67
114 Operational Acceptance Test 100% 20.52 10% 2.05 0.02 90% 18.47 0.14 1 0.14 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 2.94
115 User Training 100% 4.10 10% 0.41 0.00 90% 3.69 0.03 1 0.03 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.59
116 Transition Conversion 100% 4.10 10% 0.41 0.00 90% 3.69 0.03 1 0.03 114 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.59
117 Implemetation 100% 8.21 10% 0.82 0.01 90% 7.39 0.06 1 0.06 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 1.18
118 Post Implem Project Review 100% 8.21 10% 0.82 0.01 90% 7.39 0.06 1 0.2 1 0.03 1.00 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.53
Post Implem
Transition
Initiation
Analysis
Design
Build
Test
total
total effort - 3.11 0.10 0.34 0.16 0.16 1.40 0.78 0.12 0.06
release (man.month)
<enter release name 3.11 0.10 0.34 0.16 0.16 1.40 0.78 0.12 0.06
Post Implem
Transition
Analysis
Initiation
Design
Build
Test
release total
time scale
#ADDIN? ### #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN?
1 (months)
time to market #ADDIN? months