Esforço -Completa

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Use Case Point Capacity Planning UseCases

v07.0

Project : <enter project name> Capacity Planning


Use Cases list Use Case Point Assesment Business Requirements
Flow - Path assessment

New or
release Actor Main Alternative Exception Complexity
Application Change
Id Use Case name
1 EXTRATO CONTA CORRENTE new Person 1 9 1 complex

insert new row before this point (up to 999)

01/22/2025 19:03:29 1 842097050.xls


Project : <enter project name> v07.0
Technical
Technical Factor Assessment Weight Influence value
Factor
Distributed system
01 2 very high 5 10
Is the system having distributed architecture or centralized architecture?
Response or throughput performance objectives
02 Does the client need the system to be how fast? Is time response one of the 1 none 0 0
important criteria?
End-user efficiency
03 1 none 0 0
How's the end user's efficiency?
Complex internal processing
04 Is the business process very complex? Like complicated accounts closing, 1 none 0 0
inventory tracking, heavy tax calculation etc.
Reusable code
05 Do we intend to keep the reusability high? So it will increase the design 1 none 0 0
effort.
Easy to install
06 Is client looking for an easier installation? By default, we get many installers 0.5 none 0 0
which create install packages. But the client might be looking for some
custom installation, probably depending on modules.
Easy to use
07 0.5 none 0 0
Is user friendliness a top priority?
Portable
08 2 none 0 0
Is the customer also looking for cross platform implementation?
Easy to change
09 Is the customer looking for high customization in the future? That also 1 none 0 0
increases the architecture design complexity and hence this factor.

10 Concurrent 1 low 2 2
Is the customer looking at large number of users working with locking
support? This will increase the architecture complexity and hence this value.
Includes security features
11 Is the customer looking at having heavy security like SSL? Or do we have to 1 none 0 0
write custom code logic for encryption?
Provides access for third parties
Does the project depends on using third party controls? For understanding
12 the third-party controls and studying its pros and cons, is there any 1 none 0 0
considerable effort that will be required? So, this factor should be rated
accordingly.
Special user training facilities are required
13 Will the software from the user perspective be so complex that a separated 1 average 3 3
training has to be provided? So this factor will vary accordingly.
TFactor 15
TCF - Technical Complexity Factor = ( 0,6 + ( 0,01 * TFator ) ) 0.75
Project : <enter project name> v07.0
Environment
Enviroment Factor Assessment Weigth Influence value
Factor
Familiarity with RBPM
01 1.5 none 0 0

Application experience
02 0.5 none 0 0
How much is knows the application objectives?
Object-oriented experience
As use-case documents are inputs to object oriented design, it's
03 important that people working on the project have basic 1 none 0 0
knowledge of OOP concepts.
Lead analyst capability
04 How is the analyst who is leading the project? Does he have 0.5 none 0 0
enough knowledge of the problem domain?.
Motivation
Are the programmers motivated for working on the project?
05 Instability in the project will always lead to people leaving half 1 none 0 0
way through their source code. And the hand over becomes
really tough.
Stable requirements
Is the user clear about what he wants? I have seen clients'
06 expectations are the most important factor in the stability of 2 low 2 4
requirements. If the client is from a highly changing nature, put
this value to maximum.
Part-time workers
07 -1 average 3 -3
Are there part-time staff on the project, like consultants etc.?
Difficult programming language
08 How much is the language complexity, Assembly, VB 6.0, C++ -1 very high 5 -5
and C or Framework?
Efactor -4
EF - Enviroment Factor = ( 1,4 + ( -0,03 * Efactor) ) 1.52
Use Case Point Capacity Planning UseCasePoint
v07.0 Project : <enter project name>
UseCase Point
Release : 1 <enter release name >
Functional
Item new Change Weight Complexity UUCP
Complexity
Actor time - - 1 - 3.0
system - - 2 -
person 1 - 3 3.0
Use Case Simple - - 5 - 15.0
Medium - - 10 -
Complex 1 - 15 15.0
UUCP - Unadjusted Use Case Point 18.0
Ajusted Use Case Point factor
RF - REQUIREMENT FACTOR: Represents the estimatives' accuracy level from
the Use Cases and Interface lists, totally 1.000
and requirements stability (change request) factor.
TCF - Technical Complexity Factor: Is the solution going to use a new
0.750
technology within the IT?
EF - Enviroment Factor: Has the development team experience on the
1.520
application or technology that will be used (new and existent ones)?
UCP = UUCP * AF * TCF * EF 20.52

UCP total 20.52

01/22/2025 19:03:29 4 842097050.xls


Use Case Point Capacity Planning Effort

v07.0 Project : <enter project name>


Effort
Avarage IT Management Effort Team Effort
warning - if you get an error "#name?" on Schedule cells:
Produc Project effort Project man.month
UCP (man.hour) man man team man man rate
- Select Tool > Add ins > "Analysis tool - VBA"
tivity Mgnt - Save the file and re-open it through File / Open option.
(Hour/UCP) hour month rate hours months
rate
productive
20.52 20.0 410.40 10% 41.04 0.31 90% 369.4 2.80 132.0
hours

RBPM - effort distribution Productivity IT Management Effort Team Effort Team (FTE) Schedule
activity Project Supply Time Pre
man man team man man LAG start finish duration
id Release id Phase Activity adjust effort Mgnt Mgnt IT Dev ITO User Line Activity
hour month rate hour month (month) date date (workday)
(man.hour) rate rate (month) id
Management Project & Supply Mgmt 41.04 0.31 15/8/24 #ADDIN?
001 Initial Request & Review 100% 12.31 10% 1.23 0.01 90% 11.08 0.08 1 0.2 0.5 0.05 15/8/24 #ADDIN? 1.04
Initiation
002 Prioritisation 100% 0.82 10% 0.08 0.00 90% 0.74 0.01 1 0.5 0.00 0.50 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.08
003 0 Terms of Engagement 100% 0.82 10% 0.08 0.00 90% 0.74 0.01 1 0.2 0.00 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.10
004 Requirement Impact Analysis 100% 1.23 10% 0.12 0.00 90% 1.11 0.01 1 0.5 0.01 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.12
005 Viability 100% 1.23 10% 0.12 0.00 90% 1.11 0.01 1 0.5 0.01 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.12
<enter release name > UCP 20.52
106 Requirement Requirements Gathering 100% 41.04 10% 4.10 0.03 90% 36.94 0.28 1 0.5 0.19 003 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 3.92
107 Analysis Analysis 100% 20.52 10% 2.05 0.02 90% 18.47 0.14 1 0.1 0.13 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 2.67
108 Design Design 100% 20.52 10% 2.05 0.02 90% 18.47 0.14 1 0.1 0.13 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 2.67
109 Tech & User Documentation 100% 8.21 10% 0.82 0.01 90% 7.39 0.06 1 0.06 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 1.18
110 Build Rules & Coding 100% 102.60 10% 10.26 0.08 90% 92.34 0.70 1 0.70 108 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 14.69
111 Unit Test & Unit Integr Test 100% 73.87 10% 7.39 0.06 90% 66.48 0.50 1 0.50 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 10.58
112 1 Sys Test & Sys Integr Test 100% 61.56 10% 6.16 0.05 90% 55.40 0.42 1 0.42 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 8.81
113 Test User Acceptance Test 100% 20.52 10% 2.05 0.02 90% 18.47 0.14 0.1 1 0.13 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 2.67
114 Operational Acceptance Test 100% 20.52 10% 2.05 0.02 90% 18.47 0.14 1 0.14 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 2.94
115 User Training 100% 4.10 10% 0.41 0.00 90% 3.69 0.03 1 0.03 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.59
116 Transition Conversion 100% 4.10 10% 0.41 0.00 90% 3.69 0.03 1 0.03 114 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.59
117 Implemetation 100% 8.21 10% 0.82 0.01 90% 7.39 0.06 1 0.06 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 1.18
118 Post Implem Project Review 100% 8.21 10% 0.82 0.01 90% 7.39 0.06 1 0.2 1 0.03 1.00 #ADDIN? #ADDIN? 0.53

total 369.36 2.80

Clear Choice - Resource


Requirement

Post Implem
Transition
Initiation

Analysis

Design

Build

Test

total
total effort - 3.11 0.10 0.34 0.16 0.16 1.40 0.78 0.12 0.06
release (man.month)

<enter release name 3.11 0.10 0.34 0.16 0.16 1.40 0.78 0.12 0.06

IT PM 0.31 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.08 0.01 0.01


1 IT Dev 2.30 0.05 0.20 0.13 0.13 1.26 0.42 0.08 0.03
ITO 0.19 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.15 - 0.01
User 0.31 0.03 0.10 - - - 0.13 0.03 0.03

Clear Choice - Scorecard - Timeline


Requirement

Post Implem
Transition
Analysis
Initiation

Design

Build

Test

release total
time scale
#ADDIN? ### #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN? #ADDIN?
1 (months)
time to market #ADDIN? months

01/22/2025 19:03:29 5 842097050.xls

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy