C0 - Basics (1)
C0 - Basics (1)
Chapter 0 - Basics
What is an assurance engagement?
● Assurance engagement is a kind of service engagement (arrangement) in which a person gives his opinion
on subject matter.
● The subject matter may be anything, it may be any specific information.
● There are three parties involved.
○ The person giving an opinion is called a practitioner.
○ The practitioner is usually appointed by the intended user, who is the person who will be using the
subject matter or information.
○ The “subject matter” is prepared by another party known as responsible party.
● For expressing an opinion on “subject matter” practitioner will examine and will obtain sufficient and
appropriate evidence.
● The practitioner evaluate the subject matter against a standard benchmark or a suitable criteria and will
obtain sufficient and appropriate evidence and then give his opinion whether the specific information is as
per the suitable criteria or not through a written report.
What is Auditing?
Auditing is an assurance service, in which auditor (The person who conducts audit) gives an opinion on financial
information.
Meaning of Audit
An audit is an
● Independent examination of
● financial information of
● any entity,
○ whether profit oriented or not, and irrespective of its size or legal form,
● when such an examination is conducted with a view to expressing an opinion thereon
Objectives of Auditor
In conducting audit of FSs, objectives of auditor in accordance with SA 200 “Overall Objectives of the Independent
auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing” are: -
a) To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the FSs as a whole are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the FSs are
prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework; and
b) To report on the FSs, and communicate as required by the SAs, in accordance with the auditor’s findings.
Reasonable Assurance
A high, but not absolute, level of assurance.
Misstatement
A difference between
● the amount, classification, presentation, or disclosure
○ of a reported FS item
● and the amount, classification, presentation, or disclosure
○ that is required for the item to be in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
● ‘Fraud’ deals with intentional misrepresentation but, ‘error’, on the other hand, refers to unintentional
mistakes in financial information.
Types of Opinion
● Clean Opinion
● Modified Opinion
○ Qualified Opinion
○ Adverse
○ Disclaimer of Opinion
Meaning of Pervasive
● The term pervasive is used to describe the effect of misstatements on the financial statement
● Whether the effect of material misstatement is pervasive or not it depends on auditors judgement.
● While deciding that the effect is pervasive or not auditor must keep the following things in mind
● Effect is pervasive when it is not confined to a specific element
● Even if it is confined to a specific element the effect can be considered as pervasive if it represent a
substantial proportion of financial statements
● In relation to disclosures, The effect can be considered as pervasive if It is fundamental to users
understanding of the financial statements.
Management
● The person(s) with executive responsibility for conduct of entity's operation
➢ Access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation of
the financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters;
➢ Additional information that the auditor may request from management for the purpose of the
audit; and
➢ Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom the auditor determines it
necessary to obtain audit evidence.
Internal Control
The Process designed, implemented and maintained by
➔ Those charged with governance
➔ Management
➔ Other personnel
To Provide Reasonable Assurance with regard to
● Reliability of financial reporting
● Effectiveness & Efficiency of operations
● Safeguarding of assets
● Compliance with applicable law & regulations
Assertions
● Assertions refer to representations by management, explicit or otherwise, that are embodied in the financial
statements.
● By stating that the financial statements are in compliance with the relevant financial reporting framework,
management is making certain assertions about the proper recognition, measurement, presentation, and
disclosure of the various components of the financial statements and any accompanying disclosures.
● Auditor will check those claims (assertions).
● The assertions used by the auditor to identify potential errors or inaccuracies in financial statements can be
divided into three categories and may take the following forms.
Classification
Completeness
All transactions and events that should have been recorded have been recorded.
Accuracy
Amounts and other data relating to recorded transactions and events have been recorded appropriately.
Cut-off
Transactions and events have been recorded in the correct accounting period.
Classification
Transactions and events have been recorded in the proper accounts.
Completeness
All assets, liabilities and equity interests that should have been recorded have been recorded.
Completeness
All disclosures that should have been included in the financial statements have been included.
Audit evidence
Information used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusions on which the auditor’s opinion is based. Audit
evidence includes both information contained in the accounting records underlying the financial statements and
other information.
Other information
Other information that authenticates the accounting records and also supports the auditor’s rationale behind the
true and fair presentation of the financial statements:
Other information which the auditor may use as audit evidence includes, for example
● minutes of the meetings,
● written confirmations from trade receivables and trade payables,
● manuals containing details of internal control etc.
Audit Risk
The risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate opinion when the FSs are materially misstated. Audit risk can
be divided into two part
● Risk of material misstatement.
○ Inherent risk
○ Control risk
● Detection Risk
Timeliness of Financial Reporting and the Balance between Benefit and Cost
● The relevance of information, and thereby its value, tends to diminish overtime,
● and there is a balance to be struck between the reliability of information and its cost.
● There is an expectation by users of financial statements that the auditor will form an opinion on the financial
statements within a reasonable period of time and at a reasonable cost
Unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the financial statements may not be detected
Because of the limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the
financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance
with SAs.
However, the inherent limitations of an audit are not a justification for the auditor to be satisfied with less-than
persuasive audit evidence.
A Analytical Procedures
E Enquiry
I Inspection
O Observation
U RecalcUlation
Reperformance
External Confirmation
Basics
Standards collectively known as the Engagements Standards issued by AASB under the authority of the council of
ICAI.
The following Standards issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board under the authority of the Council
are collectively known as the Engagement Standards:
● Standards on Auditing (SAs), to be applied in the audit of historical financial information.
● Standards on Review Engagement (SREs), to be applied in the review of historical financial information.
● Standards on Assurance Engagements (SAEs), to be applied in assurance engagements, dealing with
subject-matters other than historical financial information.
● Standards on Related Services (SRSs), to be applied to engagements involving application of agreed upon
procedures to information, compilation engagements, and other related services engagements as may be
specified by the ICAI.
● Standards on Quality Control (SQCs) issued by the AASB under the authority of the Council, are to be applied
for all services covered by the Engagement Standards as described above.
It is to be understood that Standards on Auditing (SAs) apply in “audit of historical financial information” whereas
Standards on Review Engagements (SREs) apply in “review of historical financial information”. Remember that
Standards on auditing apply in “audit” of historical financial information which is a reasonable assurance
engagement whereas Standards on Review Engagements apply in “review” of historical financial information which
is a limited assurance engagement only.
There is another set of standards which apply in assurance engagements dealing with subject matters other than
historical financial information. Such assurance engagements do not include “audit” or “review” of historical
financial information. These standards are known as Standards on Assurance Engagements.
For example, an assurance engagement relating to examination of Internal Control of The Entity.
ICAI re-classified the existing auditing and assurance standards in 2008. The objective of re-classification is to
converge our existing auditing and assurance standards with the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) issued by
the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Numbering of Standards
Standard on Quality Control (SQC) 01-99
Standard on Auditing (SA) 100-999
Standard on Review Engagement (SRE) 2000-2699
Standard on Assurance Engagement (SAE) 3000-3699
Related Services (SRS) 4000-4699
Classification of SAs
Introductory matters 100-199
General Principles and Responsibilities 200-299
Risk Assessment and Response to Assessed Risk 300-499
Audit Evidence 500-599
Using work of Others 600-699
Audit conclusions and Reporting 700-799
Specialised Areas 800-899
List of Standards
General Principles and Responsibilities
1 SA 200 Overall objectives of the Independent Auditor and the conduct of the Audit in Accordance with
Standard on Auditing
2 SA 210 Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements
3 SA 220 Quality Control for an Audit of financial statements
4 SA 230 Audit Documentation
5 SA 240 The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements.
6 SA 250 Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements
7 SA 260 Communication with those Charged with Governance
8 SA 265 Communicating Deficiencies in Internal control to those Charged with Governance and
Management
9 SA 299 Joint Audit of financial statements
Risk Assessment and Responses to Assessed Risks