Michael Dougher
Michael Dougher
1 (Spring)
Thus, establishing operations act upon have been used to refer to these same
all three elements of the three-term factors. Goldiamond (1983), for ex-
contingency. Food deprivation is an ample, used the term potentiating var-
example of an establishing operation. iables, and Hawkins (1986) used the
As such, it establishes food and asso- term motivating variables, although he
ciated conditioned events as effective referred to their potentiating and de-
reinforcers, evokes behaviors that have potentiating effects on consequent
been previously reinforced with food, stimuli. Before that, Kantor (1959)
and increases the evocative effective- used the term setting factors, which he
ness of discriminative stimuli that have defined as those circumstances that in-
been associated with the availability of fluence which stimulus-response rela-
food reinforcers. tions would occur out of all those cur-
Parenthetically, the effects of estab- rently comprising a person's behavioral
lishing operations on discriminative repertoire built up through past per-
stimuli were implied in Michael's 1982 son-environment interactions. In their
paper, but were not fully articulated un- classic behavioral text on child devel-
til his 1993 paper. From our perspec- opment, Bijou and Baer (1961) used
tive, this is an important addition be- the term setting events, which they de-
cause, as we try to clarify below, it scribed as follows: "In contrast to
suggests a behavior-analytic explana- stimulus events, setting events are
tion of some interesting findings in the more complicated than the simple pres-
literature concerned with the relation ence, absence or change of a stimulus.
between emotion and cognition. To a ... Instead, a setting event is a stimu-
large extent, the cognitive phenomena lus-response interaction, which simply
referred to in this literature are essen- because it has occurred will affect oth-
tially examples of differential stimulus er stimulus-response relationships
control, and both the differential stim- which follow it" (p. 21). Leigland
ulus control and the emotional states (1984) reviewed the various terms that
described in these studies appear to be have been used in reference to the class
the effects of establishing operations. of variables that determine the effec-
In addition to establishing opera- tiveness of contingencies, and suggest-
tions, Michael also identifies and dis- ed that setting events and setting fac-
cusses what he calls abolishing opera- tors may be too general and function-
tions. Abolishing operations have the ally vague to suffice as technical terms.
opposite effects of establishing opera- He argues that, as Michael defines it,
tions. Abolishing operations reduce the establishing operation is more func-
probability of certain behaviors, depo- tionally specific and, therefore, prefer-
tentiate certain events as reinforcers, able as a technical term. We agree and,
and reduce the discriminative control for that reason, have opted to use the
exerted by certain stimuli. Where food term establishing operations rather
deprivation functions as an establishing than setting events or setting factors in
operation, food satiation functions as the present paper. Also, for purposes of
an abolishing operation. It reduces the convenience, we will use establishing
probability of behavior that has been operations in the present paper to col-
reinforced with food, depotentiates lectively refer to both establishing and
food as a reinforcer, and decreases the abolishing operations, unless specifi-
discriminative control exerted by stim- cally referring to the abolishing effects
uli correlated with the availability of of a particular operation.
food reinforcers. Behavior analysts who have written
Although we have focused on the on the topic have mentioned a number
term establishing operations to refer of different operations, procedures, and
collectively to function-altering factors events that might function as establish-
outside the three-term contingency, it ing operations. Kantor (1959), Bijou
should be pointed out that other terms (1976), and Bijou and Baer (1961)
ESTABLISHING OPERATIONS 15
identified three classes of events con- win, Mayer, & Whitehurst, 1971; Rin-
sisting of (a) physiological conditions cover & Koegel, 1975; Wahler, 1980;
(e.g., conditions of deprivation or sa- Wahler & Fox, 1980) that had specifi-
tiation, illness or health, amount of cally manipulated setting events in an
rest, presence or absence of drugs), (b) attempt to modify behavior. Since then,
durational events (e.g., presence or ab- the number of studies that have specif-
sence of certain events, objects, or per- ically examined establishing operations
sons; instructions or verbal statements; remains comparatively small, despite
production requirements in a work set- reported successes and specific calls
ting; ambient noise or ambient temper- for this kind of research (Gardner, Kar-
ature), and (c) behavioral histories an, & Cole, 1984; Halle & Spradlin,
(e.g., family interactions before arriv- 1993; Homer, Vaughn, Day, & Ard,
ing at work or school, previous expe- 1996). This appears to be an important
rience with existing contingencies, the gap in the behavior-analytic literature.
development of relevant behavioral In their discussion of setting events,
repertoires). Hawkins (1986) lists five Wahler and Fox (1981) echo Kantor's
types of manipulations that could serve (1959) "friendly" criticism that the ex-
as establishing operations, and sug- perimental analysis of behavior has un-
gests that these might be helpful to duly emphasized the relatively simple
consider when developing programs to and temporally proximate conditions
change targeted behaviors. His five cat- that control behavior. They call for a
egories are chemical, health, emotion- conceptual and methodological expan-
al, precurrent stimuli, and learning. Mi- sion of behavior analysis that would
chael (1993) also identified a number include more complex and temporally
of potential establishing operations, in- distant environment-behavior relations
cluding deprivation, aversive stimula- and descriptive as well as experimental
tion, temperature changes, variables re- analyses. In that regard, they consider
lated to sexual reinforcement, a range Bijou and Baer's (1961) definition of
of operations that produce emotions, setting events to be especially impor-
and conditioned establishing opera- tant in that it emphasized the definition
tions. of setting events as stimulus-response
Taken together, these authors have interactions and acknowledged the im-
identified a very broad range of events, portance of factors that occur separate
operations, and conditions that might in space and time from the stimulus-
function as establishing operations. response relations they influence.
Yet, despite the early identification of
the importance of establishing opera- On the Duration of the Effects of
tions and the broad range of events that Establishing Operations
function as such, behavior analysts
have given relatively little conceptual The importance of considering tem-
or empirical attention to the role of es- porally distant factors raises the issue
tablishing operations in understanding of whether the effects of establishing
or modifying human behavior. As operations are momentary (Michael,
Hawkins (1986) and Michael (1982, 1982, 1993). Although the meaning of
1993) point out, the two establishing momentary is not specified, the term
operations that have received the most implies that the effects are brief and
attention are deprivation and aversive dissipate rather quickly. But why must
stimulation (e.g., Keller & Schoenfeld, this be so? What behavioral principles
1950; Skinner, 1938, chap. 9 and 10; mandate that the effects of establishing
1953, chap. 9 and 11; 1957, pp. 28-32, operations cannot be much longer, per-
212-214). As of 1981, Wahler and Fox haps weeks, months, or even years? If
could find only a handful of studies in it is possible for reinforcement to pro-
the applied behavior analysis literature duce changes in behavior that last for
(Fowler & Baer, 1981; Peterson, Mer- years, why is it not also possible for
16 MICHAEL J. DOUGHER & LUCIANNE HACKBERT
generally high levels of aversive stim- interact, relate, create, recreate, and de-
ulation. We offered a behavior-analytic rive pleasure from these activities and
account of how these antecedent con- their consequences.
ditions could account for the common Depressive contingencies, on the
symptoms of depression. In so doing other hand, are those that evoke and
we identified three conceptually dis- maintain depressed behavior. By de-
tinct potential behavioral effects of pressed behavior, we are referring to
these conditions. the verbal and nonverbal behavior
The first and most obvious effect is characteristic of depressed clients.
that all three may lead to low or de- These include excessive crying, com-
creased rates of appropriate behavior. plaining, blaming, worrying, self-dep-
For example, if repeated attempts to recation, inaccurate rule formulation
develop social relationships, succeed at about existing and future contingen-
work, or win parental approval go cies, inaccurate assessments of one's
largely unreinforced or are frequently ability to satisfy existing and future
met with aversive consequences, the contingencies, social avoidance, drug
frequency of these behaviors is likely or alcohol abuse, pessimistic predic-
to diminish. The second possible effect tions about the future, and sleep, eat-
of these antecedents is respondent elic- ing, and sexual disturbances. It is our
itation. Persistent low rates of rein- contention that the conditions that of-
forcement, extinction, or persistent ten precede depression function as es-
punishment not only reduce the fre- tablishing operations in that they estab-
quency of relevant operants but also lish depressive contingencies and abol-
can act as unconditioned or condi- ish nondepressive contingencies. We
tioned elicitors that produce very already mentioned the behaviors that
strong emotional reactions. Consider, are often evoked by these conditions,
for example, the emotional reactions to so we will turn our attention now to
the death of a loved one, the termina- their effects on behavioral consequenc-
tion of a valued relationship or job, the es and then to their effects on the dis-
inability to obtain or maintain desired criminative control exerted by relevant
friendships, or having to tolerate con- stimuli.
stant criticism or physical abuse. These The antecedent conditions of depres-
types of situations often elicit feelings sion may establish as effective rein-
of anger, frustration, despair, inadequa- forcers expressions of sympathy, com-
cy, and self-contempt. miseration, reassurance, offers of assis-
The third effect of these conditions, tance, or the removal of expectations,
and the one that we believe has been demands, or threats of punishment.
most often overlooked, is that they They may also differentially potentiate
may function as establishing (or abol- the reinforcing effects of food, sleep,
ishing) operations. In our previous pa- isolation, drugs, and alcohol. This may
per, we attempted to illustrate these ef- explain why depressives often overeat,
fects by heuristically dividing the oversleep, prefer to stay by themselves,
world into two very general types of and are prone to drug and alcohol
reinforcement contingencies: depres- abuse. Just as these conditions may es-
sive and nondepressive. We described tablish certain reinforcers, they may
nondepressive contingencies as those also abolish the reinforcing effects of
that are typically established when in- otherwise highly potent behavioral
dividuals are not depressed. They in- consequences. Such activities as social
clude the interpersonal, occupational, interactions, work, and hobbies may
recreational, and social contingencies not only lose their reinforcing effects
that characterize most people's daily but may even become aversive, func-
lives. When there is an adequate rep- tioning as negative reinforcers by their
ertoire and these contingencies are es- offset or as punishers by their onset.
tablished, individuals work, play, love, The loss of reinforcer effectiveness on
18 MICHAEL J. DOUGHER & LUCIANNE HACKBERT
a wide scale is referred to clinically as that are intended to induce specific
anhedonia, and it may extend to such moods. Statements like "I'm a failure
primary reinforcers as food and sex. at most things I do" and "Even my
This anhedonia interferes with the parents have difficulty loving me" are
treatment of depressives, which often intended to induce a depressed mood,
includes increasing the density of re- whereas "I feel competent, happy, and
inforcement in their lives. But increas- secure" and "Things just go right for
ing the density of reinforcement usu- me" are statements intended to induce
ally requires clients to be motivated an elated mood. The effects of these
enough to emit the behaviors that pro- manipulations are typically measured
duce reinforcing consequences. That is, by mood inventories with acceptable
relevant consequences must be effec- psychometric properties. Even when
tive reinforcers. It is common, how- the demand characteristics of these
ever, to hear depressed clients com- studies are controlled, these procedures
plain that they just do not care about have been reported to induce some-
once potent reinforcers, or they just do times very significant mood changes in
not feel like doing what it takes to ob- otherwise normal subjects. To the ex-
tain them. This wide-scale loss of re- tent that verbally reported mood
inforcer effectiveness in itself entails a changes reflect respondent processes,
low density of reinforcement, which, verbal mood-induction procedures can
of course, is one of the previously be seen as conditioned elicitors. In the
mentioned antecedents of depression. same way, the negative self-statement
Thus, the abolishing function of the an- made by depressives can exacerbate
tecedents of depression may cause a their feelings of sadness and despon-
self-perpetuating cycle or, as it is more dence.
commonly called, a downward spiral Although the establishing functions
of depression. of mood-induction procedures have not
Another factor that may contribute yet been experimentally demonstrated,
to a self-perpetuating cycle in depres- it is reasonable to speculate that the
sion is the effect of the self-directed negative self-statements emitted by de-
verbalizations often emitted by de- pressives would not only affect their
pressed clients. As we mentioned pre- mood but would also have establishing
viously, these verbalizations are often and abolishing functions. In the same
very self-critical, self-deprecating, and way that a dinner companion's detailed
pessimistic. It is common for depressed description of the symptoms produced
clients to make statements like "I'm no by a recent bout with the flu might di-
good," "I'll never be success- minish one's appetite for dinner, a
ful," "Nobody likes to be around me," round of self-criticism about one's so-
"I am unlovable," and "Nothing will cial competence might also diminish
ever change." Although such state- the evocative and reinforcing effects of
ments may be reinforced with sympa- an upcoming social event.
thy and attention, they can also have A third factor that may maintain or
conditioned eliciting and establishing exacerbate depression is the reaction of
functions for the speaker's behavior. other people to the distressed behavior
The mood-induction literature demon- of depressives. Although it may ini-
strates that verbal statements can elicit tially be reinforced by expressions of
emotional reactions. In an attempt to sympathy and concern or the removal
study the relation between emotion and of demands, distressed behavior is per-
cognition, some investigators have em- ceived by others as aversive, and they
ployed verbal mood-induction tech- try to escape or avoid it (Coyne, 1976).
niques (see Bower, 1981, and Ellis & This, of course, is a form of extinction,
Ashbrook, 1989, for reviews of this lit- one of the previously mentioned ante-
erature). These techniques involve hav- cedents of depression. It is not difficult
ing subjects read a series of statements to see how this pattern of reinforce-
ESTABLISHING OPERATIONS 19
ment for depressed behavior followed ceive, attend to, interpret, and remem-
by extinction can lead to deeper levels ber anxiety-relevant stimuli compared
of depression. to normal ones. An example of cogni-
Having discussed the types of be- tive bias is the difference in reaction
havior evoked by the antecedents of times between anxious and normal
depression and their potential effects subjects on emotional Stroop tasks. On
on relevant behavioral consequences, these tasks, anxiety-related and non-
we turn our attention now to their ef- anxiety-related words are presented in
fects on relevant discriminative stimu- various colors. Subjects are then asked
li. Among other so-called "cognitive to report the color of the words as
deficits" (Beck, 1967; Beck, Rush, quickly as they can. Anxious subjects
Shaw, & Emory, 1979; Ellis, 1990; El- take longer to name the colors of the
lis et al., 1997), a core symptom of de- anxiety-related words than they do to
pression is the tendency to selectively name the colors of the non-anxiety-re-
attend to and remember negative lated words. Normal subjects show no
events. When asked to recall a list of reaction-time differences to the two
words varying in affective content, or sets of words. The assumption is that
the words used in a previously read the anxious subjects unconsciously at-
paragraph, or just to freely recall early tend to the anxiety-related words, and
memories, depressives tend to differ- that interferes with their reaction times
entially remember words and experi- in naming the colors. Memory bias is
ences associated with sad and unpleas- demonstrated by the differences in per-
ant affect (Ellis, 1990). When giving formance between anxious subjects
self-descriptions, depressives overem- and normal subjects on a memory task.
phasize their negative characteristics When given a list of words to study
and deemphasize their positive attri- and later recall, anxious subjects tend
butes. In social situations, they selec- to remember more anxiety-related
tively attend to the negative reactions words than non-anxiety-related words.
of others and seem oblivious to posi- Normal subjects show no differential
tive reactions. Moreover, this selective recall.
attention tends to covary with the in- Cognitive psychologists have postu-
tensity of depressed affect; the more lated a variety of mental processes
depressed they are, the more they focus (e.g., Ellis, 1990; Ellis et al., 1993) to
on the negative (Beck, 1967; Beck et explain these data, but, in behavioral
al., 1979). This tendency to differen- terms, it appears that they may be ex-
tially attend to negative stimuli is also plained by appeal to establishing op-
found in normal subjects who have erations. Most of the cognitive tasks
been exposed to the kind of depressed employed in these studies assess the
mood-induction procedures described stimulus control exerted by the stimuli
above. In fact, mood-induction proce- included in the tasks. In the Stroop test,
dures have been reported to impair for example, there are two dimensions
subjects' performance on a range of of the words that compete for stimulus
cognitive tasks including memory, at- control: the content of the words and
tention, and problem solving (Ellis, their color. Similarly, the word recall
Varner, & Becker, 1993). tests used in these studies assess the
Although the discussion thus far has differential stimulus control exerted by
focused on depression, it is not the the words on the lists the subjects were
only emotion or affective state related asked to recall. Evidently, relevant af-
to cognitive performance. McNally fect-related words exert more stimulus
(1996) reviewed a series of studies that control than non-affect-related words
demonstrate a relation between anxiety for clinical subjects but not for normal
and "cognitive bias." Cognitive bias subjects. It seems reasonable to suggest
refers to the tendency of anxiety-dis- that the mood-induction procedures
ordered clients to differentially per- and other factors that led to the devel-
20 MICHAEL J. DOUGHER & LUCIANNE HACKBERT
Obviously, there are many past and or writing about distressing, emotional,
immediate factors that must be consid- and traumatic experiences can reduce
ered in trying to account for the client's
their negative impact and even produce
current behavioral patterns. In addition,
positive outcomes. The emotional ex-
because many of the events reported in periences in these studies included the
therapy occurred in the past, an exper-death of a spouse, physical assault, the
imental analysis of their effects is not
loss of a job, divorce, and physical ill-
possible. It is possible, however, to in-
ness. The positive benefits included
terpret the client's behavior in line with
fewer visits to therapists and physi-
known behavioral principles. In that re-
cians, improved school performance,
gard, it is at least plausible and con-increased immune function, shorter pe-
ceptually justifiable to interpret the riods of time to find reemployment af-
mother's harsh treatment of the client ter a job loss, enhanced social relation-
as, among other things, a set of estab-ships, and a reduction in self-reported
lishing operations with long-term ef- physical and psychological symptoms
fects on the contingencies surrounding of distress. Interestingly, these benefits
the client's interpersonal interactions.
By her report, the client had always were observed even when the subjects
perceived interpersonal situations as received no feedback from therapists
frightening and dangerous. Rather than about their disclosures.
opportunities to share and interact, she We suggest that an adequate behav-
viewed them as situations in which ior-analytic account of these data re-
others might discover her intensely quires an appeal to the concepts of
embarrassing history and assumed per- both stimulus equivalence and the es-
sonal flaws. The client believed that, tablishing operation. By participating
given the opportunity, others would in a stimulus equivalence class (Sid-
come to see her as dumb, incompetent, man, 1994) or relational frame of co-
awkward, and boring, just as her adop- ordination (Hayes, 1991) verbal stimuli
tive mother had. Her history had effec-can acquire the functions of the events
tively determined the behavioral func- to which they refer or stand for (for a
tion of social interactions for her. They
more extended discussion see Dougher
had the potential to become punishing, & Markham, 1996). In this way, words
and events that were correlated with can bring past (or future) events into
the development of intimacy func- the psychological present. Thus, ver-
tioned effectively as discriminative balizing past traumatic experiences
stimuli that evoked avoidance behav- brings them into the present, where
ior. The client interpreted her previous
they can occur in a safe context. This
boyfriend's sexual infidelity as proof can be seen as a verbally based process
that the fears she had about herself and
that can alter both the respondent and
the consequences of social intimacy operant functions of the verbally de-
were well founded. The client's avoid- scribed events. As such, it can be un-
ance of social interactions and intima-derstood as an establishing or abolish-
cy also served as an establishing op- ing operation. As an example, verbal-
eration. It caused her feelings of lone-
izing previous experiences of child
liness, evoked her binge eating, and abuse may extinguish the emotional
eventually led her to therapy.
elicitation functions of those experi-
Verbalizing Distressing Events ences as well as alter the reinforcing
Reduces Their Impact and evoking functions of relevant con-
tingencies. In this way, the reinforcing
Pennebaker (1997) reviewed a series effects of hurting others may be abol-
of studies (see also Pennebaker, 1995, ished (or at least diminished), as would
and Pennebaker, Colder, & Sharp, the evocative effects of other people as
1990) that suggest that simply talking discriminative stimuli for aggression.
22 MICHAEL J. DOUGHER & LUCIANNE HACKBERT