The document discusses the relationship between average cost (AC) and marginal cost (MC) in the context of different laws of returns: increasing, diminishing, and constant returns. It explains how these costs behave under various production conditions and outlines the long-run average cost (LAC) and long-run marginal cost (LMC), emphasizing their significance in production planning and cost management. Additionally, it contrasts modern and traditional theories of cost curves, highlighting the L-shaped nature of modern cost curves compared to the U-shaped traditional ones.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
475 views
Maths class 12 project
The document discusses the relationship between average cost (AC) and marginal cost (MC) in the context of different laws of returns: increasing, diminishing, and constant returns. It explains how these costs behave under various production conditions and outlines the long-run average cost (LAC) and long-run marginal cost (LMC), emphasizing their significance in production planning and cost management. Additionally, it contrasts modern and traditional theories of cost curves, highlighting the L-shaped nature of modern cost curves compared to the U-shaped traditional ones.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17
Average Cost and Marginal Cost (With
Diagrams)
Aticle shared bys Manoj Kumar
‘The relationship between average cost and marginal cost can also be
studied in the context of laws of return.
It can be explained as under:
(@ Law of Increasing Returns or the Law of Diminishing Costs:
When a firm produces under the law of increasing returns, it means
that as it employs more and more factors of production, its output
inereases at an increasing rate.
In such a situation both the average cost and marginal cost slope
downward, but the downward slope of MC curve is more than that of
AC curve.
From Figure 11 it becomes clear that when due to the operation of the
law of increasing returns, average cost falls, marginal cost also falls.
The fall in marginal cost is much more than the average cost, so the
marginal cost remains below the average cost.Gi) Law of Diminishing Returns or Increasing Costs:
Ifa firm operates under the law of diminishing returns, it means its
output increases at diminishing rate as it employs more and more units
of factors of production. In this case, if AC increases MC also increases.
The increase in MC will be much more than the increase in AC. It ean
be shown with the help of figure 12. The Figure 12 depicts that as AC
increases MC also increases at a faster rate than the AC. Therefore, the
curve MC remains above the curve AC.Gii) Law of Constant Returns or Constant Costs:
According to the law of constant returns when a firm employs more and
more factors, output increases at a constant rate. Therefore, the
average cost curve as well as marginal cost curve remains parallel to
horizontal axis. This can be made clear with the help of diagram 13. In
the diagram 13 output has been measured on OX- axis while costs on
OY-axis. Here, we see that AC = MC and both are parallel to X-axis.Relationship of Different Cost Curves in Short Period:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
In Figure, the relationship between different cost curves can be
explained with the help of figure 14. In Fig. 14 AFC is the average fixed
cost eurve which slopes downward. It indicates that as production
increases, AFC goes on falling. In the beginning, it slopes steeply but
later on rate of fall slows down. AVC is the average variable cost. It falls
up to point E and then rises upward. SAC is the short run average cost
curve having U-shape. The minimum point E of AVC oceurs earlier
than the minimum point E’ of SAC. MC passes from the minimum
points of both AVC and SAC through the points E and E’ respectively.
Costs in Long Run Period:
Long-run is a period in which there is sufficient time to alter the
equipment and the scale or organization with a view to produce
different quantities of output. In other words, if we want to change
output, it can be done by changing all the factors. It is due to the reason
that in the long-run, all the factors are variable.
According to Koutsoyiannis, “In the long-run, all the factors of
production are assumed to be variable.” In the same fashion Leftwich
has defined the long-period as, “It will be helpful to think of the long
run situations into any one in which the firm can move.”Long-Run Average Cost Curve:
Long-run average cost is the long run total cost divided by the level of
output.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
LAC=LTC/Q
According to Robert Awh, “The long run average cost curve shows the
lowest average cost of producing output when all inputs can be varied
freely.”
Similarly, J.S. Bain has defined the long-run average cost as, “The long-
run average cost curve shows for each possible output, the lowest cost
of producing that output in the long run.” Moreover, in the long-run,
each firm can make use of different sizes of plants.Long Run Total Cost:
‘According to Leibhafasky, “The long run total cost of production is the
least possible cost of producing any given level of output when all
inputs are variable.”
Long run total cost is always less than or equal to short run total cost,
but it is never more than short run total cost. Long run total cost curve
represents the least cost of different quantities of output. Therefore, it
is tangent to any given point, on short run total cost. In Fig. 15 three
different types of long run total cost curves are shown. LTC, has been
drawn on the assumption that as output is increased, cost at first rises
at diminishing rate and then at increasing rate. LTC, has been drawn
on the assumption that increase in output is followed by rise in cost at
constant rate.
LTC; has been drawn on the assumption that as output increases, cost
rises at diminishing rate. Long run cost curve always begins from the
point of origin while short run cost curve begins from any point on OY-
axis, It means that all costs in long run are variable when quantity of
output is zero, total costs also reduced to zero.
A given level of output can be had from a special plant to which it is
appropriated. If, such a plant is put to operation, goods will be
produced at the lowest average cost. Thus, a rational producer in the
Jong- run will choose to produce with the help of such a plant. Now, the
question is how to find out this long-run average cost curve. The
answer is very simple. We can derive the LAC from the short-run
average cost curves.In Figure 16 long-run average cost has been shown. The long-run
average cost curve is tangent to different short run average cost curves.
In order to produce OX, level of output, the corresponding point on
LAC is K at which it 1$ tangent to SAC. Therefore, if a firm is willing to
produce OX, level of output, it will construct a plant corresponding to
SAC, and will operate on this curve at point K.
Different Names of LAC:
LAC is also known by the following names:
@ Envelope curve:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
LAC is also known as envelope curve because it envelopes all the SAC
curves. It indicates that LAC cannot exceed SAC. As in the long-run.
indivisible factors can be used to their full capacity, therefore, LAC
curve will be surrounding the SAC. It will not cut SAC curves or rise
upward.Gi) Planning curve:
LAC is also known as planning curve. With its help, a firm can plan as
to which plant; it should use to produce different quantities of output
so that production is obtained at minimum cost. This fact can also be
explained with the help of fig. 17.
In the Fig. 17, short-run average cost curves of all the three types of
plants have been shown. If the firm has to produce OQ, output, it will
select small plant. If it wants to produce 0Q3 level of output, it will
select the large output plant.
If the firm begins production with the small plant and demand for its
product rises slowly, it will produce at minimum cost up to OA quantity
of output. After OA amount of output its cost begins to rise. In case,
demand for the product of the firm increases to OB then the firm will
produce either with small or medium plant.
Relationship between LAC and SAC:
ADVERTISENENTS:
The relationship between LAC and SAC can be explained with the help
of Fig. 18.(a) Representation:
SAC represents the costs of a single plant, whereas LAC represents the
costs of different plants.
(2) Shape:
Like SAC, LAC is also U-shaped but it is relatively flatter. The U-shape
of LAC is less pronounced as compared to SAC. It indicates that in the
long run, increase or decrease in costs is relatively less. It is so because
LAC represents the minimum average cost of different quantities of
output so there exists less possibilities of fluctuations.
(3) LAC does not Exceed SAC:
LAC cannot be more than SAC. It is so because LAC is tangent to SAC
(4) LAC Not Tangent to all SAC at their minimum points:
Except to one SAC curve, LAC is not tangent to SAC curve at their
minimum point. It will be tangent to that SAC curve at its minimum
point which coincides with the minimum point of LAC.Long-Run Marginal Cost:
Long-ran marginal cost shows the change in total cost due to the
production of one more unit of commodity. According to Robert Awh,
“Long-run marginal cost curve is that which shows the extra cost
incurred in producing one more unit of output when all inputs can be
changed.”
LMC = ALTC/AQ
ADVERTISEMENTS:
Where
LMC = Long run Marginal Cost
ALTC = Change in Long-Run Total Cost
AQ = Change in Output
Relation between LMC and LAC:
Generally, the relation between long-run marginal cost and Jong run
average cost is similar to that of what it is in short run AC and MC. But
the only difference in LAC and LMC is that long run marginal and
average costs are more flatter than that of SAC and SMC. It is so
because in the long run all factors are variable. It can be shown with the
help of a figure 19.ADVERTISEMENTS:
In Figure 19 when LAC is falling, LMC also falls but the fall in LMC is
greater than that of LAC, Ata minimum point ie. E, LMC is equal to
LAC. In the same fashion when LAC raises LMC also rises. But the
increase in LMC is more than the increase in LAC.
Relation between LMC and SMC:
SMC refers to the effect on total cost due to the production of one more
unit of output on account of change in variable factors. LMC refers to
change in total cost due to production of one more or less unit of output
due to change in all factors. When a firm selects a proper seale of plant
in order to produce a given quantity of output then at this level of
output short run and long run marginal cost curves are equal. This ean
be shown with the help of fig. 20.In Fig. 20, OQ is the optimum level of output SMC = LMC. If output is
less than the optimum level OQ, then SMC will be less while LMC will
be relatively more. On the other hand, if output is more than the
optimum level, SMC will be more while LMC will be relatively less.
Modern Theory of Cost Curves:
Modern theories of costs have been provided by economists like Stigler,
Andrews, Sargent, Florence and Friedman ete. According to traditional
theory of costs, costs are of U-shape. But according to modern
economists, in real life cost curves are L-shaped.
Modern Theory of Short Run Cost Curves:
Like traditional theory modern theory also studies four types of short
run cost curves as Average fixed cost, Average variable cost, average
cost & marginal cost.
Average Fixed Costs:
This is the cost of indirect factors, that is, the cost of the physical and
personal organization of the firm.The fixed costs include costs on account of:
(a) The salaries and other expenses of administrative staff;
(2) Salaries of staff involved directly in production but paid on a fixed-
term basis;
(3) The depreciation of machinery;
(4) Expenses on account of the maintenance of the factory-buildings;
(5) Expenses connected with the maintenance of land on which the
plant is installed and operated.
The average fixed cost curve, under these circumstances will be as
shown in Fig. 21. The firm has some largest capacity units of machinery
which set an absolute limit to expansion of output in the short run. This
is indicated by boundary line M in the diagram.
The firm also has some small sized machinery which set a limit to
expansion. This is shown by the boundary line N.N, however, is not an
absolute limit because the firm can expand its short run output up to M
by paying overtime to labour for working longer hours. In this case, the
AEC is shown by the dotted line ab. The firm can also expand output by
purchasing some additional small-sized machinery. In this case, the
AEC shifts upwards and starts falling again, as shown by the dotted line
cD.Average Variable Cost:
In modern economics, the average variable cost includes wages of
labour employed, cost of raw- material, and running expenses of
machinery. The short run average variable cost curve in modern-micro
economic theory is saucer-shaped, that is, it is broadly U-shaped but
has a flat stretch over a range of output. This flat stretch represents the
built-in reserve capacity of the plant. Over this flat stretch, the SAVC is
equal to the MC, both being constant per unit of output. To the left of
the flat stretch, MC lies below the SAVC, while to the right of the flat
stretch; marginal cost rises above the SAVC.
The falling portion of the SAVC shows reduction in costs due to better
utilization of the fixed factor like machinery and also due to
improvement in the skill and efficiency of labour. Better efficiency of
labour helps in reducing wastage of raw-material and achieving better
utilization of the whole plant. On the other hand, rising portion of the
SAVC curve indicates declining labour efficiency due to longer hours of
work, rising costs due to payment of over-time wages, frequent
breakdown of machinery, and wastage of raw-materials.Short Run Average Cost Curve:
According to modern economists, short run average cost curve is
continuously falling up to a given level of output. This given level of
output represents reserved capacity output. Thereafter, average cost
curve rising upward meaning thereby that average cost will rise rapidly
if output is increased beyond reserved capacity. This is shown with the
help of figure 23.
a
we
ol x
oun
Fa,
Short Run Marginal Cost Curve:
In the initial stages, SMC, to modem economists falls, from point A to
Bit becomes horizontal. Moreover, from A to B marginal cost is equal
to average variable-cost. In this situation, production takes place under
reserved capacity as shown in Figure 24.