53

Bibliography

Age. (n.d.). Retrieved March 21, 2018, from

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/age

Allport, F. H. (Ed.). (n.d.). PsycNET. Retrieved March 22, 2018, from

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-09610-000?doi=1
Robotics. (n.d.). Retrieved March 21, 2018, from
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/robotics

Fish, J., Ph. D. (n.d.). Tolerance, Acceptance, Understanding. Retrieved March 30, 2018, from
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/looking-in-the-cultural-mirror/201402/
tolerance-acceptance-understanding

Gestalt Theory (von Ehrenfels). (2017, February 04). Retrieved March 30, 2018, from
https://www.learning-theories.com/gestalt-theory-von-ehrenfels.html

Hamacher, A., & Siegel, H. (2015, June 25). Study shows public perception of robotics

generally positive in EU, but declining. Retrieved March 30, 2018, from

http://robohub.org/study-shows-public-perception-of-robotics-generally-positive-in-eu-

but-declining/

Khanlari, A. (2014). TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF USING ROBOTICS IN

PRIMARY/ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR (Unpublished
master's thesis). M emorial University of N e wfoundland.

Reich-Stiebert, N., & Eyssel, F. (2015, June 14). Learning with Educational Companion
Robots? Toward Attitudes on Education Robots, Predictors of Attitudes, and Application
Potentials for Education Robots. Retrieved March 22, 2018, from
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12369-015-0308-9
 54

Sex. (n.d.). Retrieved March 21, 2018, from

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sex

Shin, N., & Kim, S. (n.d.). Learning about, from, and with Robots: Students' Perspectives.
Retrieved March 22, 2018, from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4415235/?
reload=true

Torres, C. S., Suva, M. M., Carpio, L. B., & Dagli, W. B. (2006). Retrieved March 31, 2018, from
https://www.isaaa.org/programs/supportprojects/abspii/download/Public
Understanding and Perception of and Attitude Towards Agricultural Biotechnology in the
Philippines.pdf

Zhi-Feng Liu, E. (2010, April 15). Early adolescents' perceptions of educational robots and
learning of robotics. Retrieved March 22, 2018, from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00944.x
 55

Appendix 1. Questionnaire used in the study

“LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING AND PERCEPTION OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

TOWARDS ROBOTICS”

Name: (optional)_________________________________ Sex: ( ) Male ( ) Female

Grade level: ( ) 7 ( )8 ( )9 ( ) 10

Objective:

 This questionnaire aims to determine the understanding and perception of junior high
students towards the study of robotics.

Direction: Kindly respond to the following statements as truthfully and accurately as you can
by putting a check () on the corresponding box of your answer. Please answer according to
the scale below:

5 – Absolutely True 4 – Somewhat True 3 – Can’t Say True or False

2 – Somewhat Untrue 1 – Absolutely Untrue

Level of Understanding Statements 5 4 3 2 1

1. Robotics is the study of robots.

2. Robots can be of any form and not necessarily resembles

human.
3. Robotics is a combination of science, math and engineering.

4. Robotics Engineering creates machines that can perform

tasks that humans repeatedly do.
5. Robots are controlled by sets of codes and computer
language commands.
6. Robotics makes things autonomous.

7. Five volts can be supplied to a 1.5-volt LED through a 220-

ohm resistor.
 56

8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures.

9. A servo can move 180 degrees.
10. Solar panels are products of robotics.

Level of Perception Statements 5 4 3 2 1

1. I am not interested in robotics.

2. I think I have skills for robotics.

3. I think robotics can develop my creativity.

4. Robotics can help me to have a bright future.

5. Robotics is a new adventure.

6. I think I will find robotics fun.

7. Robotics will only give me headache.

8. I think robotics is will not be worth spending for.
9. I think robotics will improve my learnings as a student.
10. Robotics will make me enjoy going to school.

Appendix 2. Statistical results used in the study.

 57

Frequency Table

Sex
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Male 72 47.1 47.1 47.1
Female 81 52.9 52.9 100.0
Total 153 100.0 100.0

Grade Level
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 7 44 28.8 28.8 28.8
8 34 22.2 22.2 51.0
9 39 25.5 25.5 76.5
10 36 23.5 23.5 100.0
Total 153 100.0 100.0
 58

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

U1. Robotics is the study of

153 1 5 4.48 .804
robots.
U2. Robots can be of any
form and not necessarily 153 1 5 4.14 .882
resemble a human.
U3. Robotics is a
combination of Science, 153 1 5 4.66 .630
Math and Engineering.
U4. Robotics Engineering
creates machines that can
153 1 5 4.39 .736
perform tasks that human
repreatedly do.
U5. Robots are controlled by
sets of codes and
153 1 5 4.54 .688
computerlanguage
commands.
U6. Robotics makes things
153 1 5 3.95 .955
autonomous.
U7. Five volts can be
supplied to a 1.5-volt LED 153 1 5 3.52 .897
through a 220-ohm resistor.
U8. Robotics cannot
153 1 5 2.59 1.060
measure temperatures.
U9. a servo can move 180
153 1 5 3.40 .846
degrees.
U10. Solar panels are
153 1 5 3.84 1.052
products of robotics.
Understanding towards
153 1.90 4.70 3.8641 .38450
Robotics Score
Valid N (listwise) 153
 59

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

P1. I am not interested in

153 1 5 2.00 1.051
robotics.
P2. I think I have skills for
153 1 5 2.83 1.025
robotics.
P3. I think robotics can
153 1 5 3.97 .935
develop my creativity.
P4. Robotics can help me
153 1 5 3.75 .948
have a bright future.
P5. Robotics is a new
153 1 5 4.25 .934
adventure.
P6. I think robotics will be
153 1 5 4.03 1.051
fun.
P7. Robotics will only give
153 1 5 2.49 1.193
me headache.
P8. I think robotics will not be
153 1 5 2.33 1.163
worth spending for.
P9. I think robotics will
improve my learnings as a 153 1 5 3.97 1.057
student.
P10. Robotics will make me
153 1 5 3.80 1.101
enjoy going to school.
Perception towards Robotics
153 1.70 5.00 3.7784 .66796
Score
Valid N (listwise) 153

Frequency Table

Level of understanding towards Robotics

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Somewhat untrue 1 .7 .7 .7

Cannot Say True or False 12 7.8 7.8 8.5

Somewhat true 110 71.9 71.9 80.4

Absolutely true 30 19.6 19.6 100.0

Total 153 100.0 100.0

 60

Level of Perception towards Robotics

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Absolutely untrue 1 .7 .7 .7

Somewhat untrue 4 2.6 2.6 3.3

Cannot Say True or False 33 21.6 21.6 24.8

Somewhat true 71 46.4 46.4 71.2

Absolutely true 44 28.8 28.8 100.0

Total 153 100.0 100.0

Understanding towards Robotics Score * Sex

Understanding towards Robotics Score

Sex Mean N Std. Deviation

Male 3.8875 72 .35798

Female 3.8432 81 .40772
Total 3.8641 153 .38450

Report
Sex U1. Robotics is U2. Robots can U3. Robotics is a U4. Robotics U5. Robots are
the study of be of any form combination of Engineering controlled by
robots. and not Science, Math creates sets of codes
necessarily and Engineering. machines that and
resemble a can perform computerlangua
human. tasks that human ge commands.
repreatedly do.
Male Mean 4.47 4.22 4.71 4.33 4.53
N 72 72 72 72 72
Std. Deviation .804 .809 .568 .732 .649
Female Mean 4.48 4.06 4.62 4.43 4.56
N 81 81 81 81 81
Std. Deviation .808 .940 .681 .741 .725
Total Mean 4.48 4.14 4.66 4.39 4.54
N 153 153 153 153 153
Std. Deviation .804 .882 .630 .736 .688

Report
 61

U7. Five volts

can be supplied U10. Solar
U6. Robotics to a 1.5-volt LED U8. Robotics U9. a servo can panels are
makes things through a 220- cannot measure move 180 products of
Sex autonomous. ohm resistor. temperatures. degrees. robotics.
Male Mean 3.92 3.49 2.49 3.43 3.74
N 72 72 72 72 72
Std. Deviation 1.031 .934 1.113 .853 1.061
Female Mean 3.99 3.56 2.69 3.37 3.94
N 81 81 81 81 81
Std. Deviation .887 .866 1.008 .843 1.041
Total Mean 3.95 3.52 2.59 3.40 3.84
N 153 153 153 153 153
Std. Deviation .955 .897 1.060 .846 1.052

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Sex Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
U1. Robotics is the study of Male .355 72 .000 .675 72 .000
robots. Female .357 81 .000 .662 81 .000
U2. Robots can be of any Male .276 72 .000 .800 72 .000
form and not necessarily Female
.252 81 .000 .825 81 .000
resemble a human.
U3. Robotics is a Male .460 72 .000 .557 72 .000
combination of Science, Female
.404 81 .000 .590 81 .000
Math and Engineering.
U4. Robotics Engineering Male .305 72 .000 .763 72 .000
creates machines that can Female
perform tasks that human .322 81 .000 .709 81 .000
repreatedly do.
U5. Robots are controlled by Male .364 72 .000 .690 72 .000
sets of codes and Female
computerlanguage .372 81 .000 .620 81 .000
commands.
U6. Robotics makes things Male .228 72 .000 .849 72 .000
autonomous. Female .222 81 .000 .846 81 .000
U7. Five volts can be Male .254 72 .000 .881 72 .000
supplied to a 1.5-volt LED Female
.246 81 .000 .871 81 .000
through a 220-ohm resistor.
U8. Robotics cannot Male .219 72 .000 .865 72 .000
measure temperatures. Female .238 81 .000 .892 81 .000
U9. a servo can move 180 Male .290 72 .000 .854 72 .000
degrees. Female .275 81 .000 .869 81 .000
U10. Solar panels are Male .209 72 .000 .881 72 .000
products of robotics. Female .216 81 .000 .847 81 .000
Understanding towards Male .109 72 .032 .972 72 .108
Robotics Score Female .149 81 .000 .911 81 .000
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

NPar Tests
 62

Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks

Sex N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

U1. Robotics is the study of robots. Male 72 76.65 5518.50

Female 81 77.31 6262.50

Total 153
U2. Robots can be of any form and Male 72 80.19 5774.00
not necessarily resemble a human. Female 81 74.16 6007.00
Total 153
U3. Robotics is a combination of Male 72 79.74 5741.50
Science, Math and Engineering. Female 81 74.56 6039.50
Total 153
U4. Robotics Engineering creates Male 72 73.74 5309.00
machines that can perform tasks Female 81 79.90 6472.00
that human repreatedly do. Total 153
U5. Robots are controlled by sets Male 72 75.22 5416.00
of codes and computerlanguage Female 81 78.58 6365.00
commands. Total 153
U6. Robotics makes things Male 72 76.05 5475.50
autonomous. Female 81 77.85 6305.50
Total 153
U7. Five volts can be supplied to a Male 72 75.07 5405.00
1.5-volt LED through a 220-ohm Female 81 78.72 6376.00
resistor. Total 153
U8. Robotics cannot measure Male 72 72.28 5204.50
temperatures. Female 81 81.19 6576.50
Total 153
U9. a servo can move 180 degrees. Male 72 78.33 5639.50
Female 81 75.82 6141.50
Total 153
U10. Solar panels are products of Male 72 72.49 5219.00
robotics. Female 81 81.01 6562.00
Total 153
Understanding towards Robotics Male 72 78.74 5669.50
Score Female 81 75.45 6111.50

Total 153
 63

Test Statisticsa
U1. Robotics is U2. Robots can U3. Robotics is U4. Robotics U5. Robots are
the study of be of any form a combination of Engineering controlled by
robots. and not Science, Math creates machines sets of codes
necessarily and that can perform and
resemble a Engineering. tasks that human computerlangua
human. repreatedly do. ge commands.
Mann-Whitney U 2890.500 2686.000 2718.500 2681.000 2788.000
Wilcoxon W 5518.500 6007.000 6039.500 5309.000 5416.000
Z -.108 -.899 -.927 -.953 -.549
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .914 .369 .354 .340 .583
a. Grouping Variable: Sex

Test Statisticsa
U6. Robotics U7. Five volts U8. U9. a servo U10. Solar Understanding
makes things can be supplied Robotics can move 180 panels are towards Robotics
autonomous. to a 1.5-volt cannot degrees. products of Score
LED through a measure robotics.
220-ohm temperature
resistor. s.
Mann-Whitney U
2847.500 2777.000 2576.500 2820.500 2591.000 2790.500
Wilcoxon W
5475.500 5405.000 5204.500 6141.500 5219.000 6111.500
Z
-.263 -.541 -1.314 -.379 -1.241 -.4617
Asymp. Sig. (2-
tailed) .792 .588 .189 .704 .215 .645

a. Grouping Variable: Sex

Report
Understanding towards Robotics Score

Grade Level Mean N Std. Deviation

7 3.8136 44 .38130
8 3.8618 34 .35163
9 3.8641 39 .43979
10 3.9278 36 .35985
Total 3.8641 153 .38450
 64

Report
U4. Robotics
Engineering
U2. Robots can creates U5. Robots are
be of any form machines that controlled by
and not U3. Robotics is a can perform sets of codes
U1. Robotics is necessarily combination of tasks that and
the study of resemble a Science, Math human computerlangua
Grade Level robots. human. and Engineering. repreatedly do. ge commands.
7 Mean 4.61 3.91 4.59 4.20 4.55
N 44 44 44 44 44
Std. Deviation .618 .984 .658 .795 .589
8 Mean 4.59 4.06 4.76 4.50 4.53
N 34 34 34 34 34
Std. Deviation .892 .919 .431 .663 .706
9 Mean 4.26 4.21 4.62 4.41 4.51
N 39 39 39 39 39
Std. Deviation .966 .833 .782 .818 .790
10 Mean 4.44 4.42 4.69 4.47 4.58
N 36 36 36 36 36
Std. Deviation .695 .692 .577 .609 .692
Total Mean 4.48 4.14 4.66 4.39 4.54
N 153 153 153 153 153
Std. Deviation .804 .882 .630 .736 .688

Report
U7. Five volts
can be supplied U10. Solar
U6. Robotics to a 1.5-volt LED U8. Robotics U9. a servo can panels are
makes things through a 220- cannot measure move 180 products of
Grade Level autonomous. ohm resistor. temperatures. degrees. robotics.
7 Mean 3.84 3.57 2.77 3.48 3.84
N 44 44 44 44 44
Std. Deviation .861 .818 1.031 .762 1.077
8 Mean 3.94 3.53 2.62 3.50 4.18
N 34 34 34 34 34
Std. Deviation 1.013 .929 1.074 .788 .904
9 Mean 4.13 3.41 2.54 3.23 3.59
N 39 39 39 39 39
Std. Deviation .951 .938 1.072 .777 1.093
10 Mean 3.92 3.58 2.42 3.39 3.81
N 36 36 36 36 36
Std. Deviation 1.025 .937 1.079 1.050 1.064
Total Mean 3.95 3.52 2.59 3.40 3.84
N 153 153 153 153 153
Std. Deviation .955 .897 1.060 .846 1.052
 65

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Grade Level Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
U1. Robotics is the study of 7 .416 44 .000 .641 44 .000
robots. 8 .413 34 .000 .521 34 .000
9 .292 39 .000 .756 39 .000
10 .316 36 .000 .710 36 .000
U2. Robots can be of any 7 .219 44 .000 .859 44 .000
form and not necessarily 8 .229 34 .000 .837 34 .000
resemble a human. 9 .266 39 .000 .810 39 .000
10 .300 36 .000 .718 36 .000
U3. Robotics is a 7 .415 44 .000 .641 44 .000
combination of Science, Math 8 .472 34 .000 .527 34 .000
and Engineering. 9 .407 39 .000 .539 39 .000
10 .452 36 .000 .576 36 .000
U4. Robotics Engineering 7 .273 44 .000 .783 44 .000
creates machines that can 8 .363 34 .000 .711 34 .000
perform tasks that human 9 .303 39 .000 .678 39 .000
repreatedly do. 10 .335 36 .000 .727 36 .000
U5. Robots are controlled by 7 .371 44 .000 .695 44 .000
sets of codes and 8 .365 34 .000 .669 34 .000
computerlanguage 9 .347 39 .000 .614 39 .000
commands. 10 .393 36 .000 .633 36 .000
U6. Robotics makes things 7 .290 44 .000 .760 44 .000
autonomous. 8 .258 34 .000 .844 34 .000
9 .256 39 .000 .798 39 .000
10 .255 36 .000 .832 36 .000
U7. Five volts can be 7 .302 44 .000 .828 44 .000
supplied to a 1.5-volt LED 8 .274 34 .000 .847 34 .000
through a 220-ohm resistor. 9 .233 39 .000 .894 39 .001
10 .227 36 .000 .881 36 .001
U8. Robotics cannot measure 7 .292 44 .000 .867 44 .000
temperatures. 8 .243 34 .000 .867 34 .001
9 .231 39 .000 .865 39 .000
10 .206 36 .001 .892 36 .002
U9. a servo can move 180 7 .325 44 .000 .811 44 .000
degrees. 8 .296 34 .000 .840 34 .000
9 .309 39 .000 .831 39 .000
10 .200 36 .001 .909 36 .006
U10. Solar panels are 7 .218 44 .000 .855 44 .000
products of robotics. 8 .260 34 .000 .806 34 .000
9 .185 39 .002 .890 39 .001
10 .202 36 .001 .854 36 .000
Understanding towards 7 .097 44 .200* .983 44 .745
Robotics Score 8 .153 34 .043 .957 34 .196
9 .211 39 .000 .801 39 .000
10 .111 36 .200* .970 36 .429
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
 66

NPar Tests

Kruskal-Wallis Test

Ranks
Grade Level N Mean Rank
U1. Robotics is the study of 7 44 82.55
robots. 8 34 86.09
9 39 67.42
10 36 72.01
Total 153
U2. Robots can be of any form 7 44 67.06
and not necessarily resemble a 8 34 73.38
human. 9 39 79.63
10 36 89.72
Total 153
U3. Robotics is a combination of 7 44 73.07
Science, Math and Engineering. 8 34 80.94
9 39 76.40
10 36 78.74
Total 153
U4. Robotics Engineering 7 44 67.35
creates machines that can 8 34 82.99
perform tasks that human 9 39 79.81
repreatedly do. 10 36 80.10
Total 153
U5. Robots are controlled by 7 44 75.09
sets of codes and 8 34 76.56
computerlanguage commands. 9 39 76.58
10 36 80.21
Total 153

Test Statisticsa,b

U4. Robotics
U2. Robots can be Engineering U5. Robots are
of any form and U3. Robotics is a creates machines controlled by sets
U1. Robotics is not necessarily combination of that can perform of codes and
the study of resemble a Science, Math and tasks that human computerlanguage
robots. human. Engineering. repreatedly do. commands.

Chi-Square 5.922 6.346 1.117 3.742 .382

df 3 3 3 3 3
Asymp. Sig. .115 .096 .773 .291 .944

a. Kruskal Wallis Test

b. Grouping Variable: Grade Level
 67

Kruskal-Wallis Test
Ranks
Grade Level N Mean Rank
U6. Robotics makes things 7 44 69.68
autonomous. 8 34 77.57
9 39 85.28
10 36 76.43
Total 153
U7. Five volts can be 7 44 78.07
supplied to a 1.5-volt LED 8 34 77.19
through a 220-ohm resistor. 9 39 72.44
10 36 80.46
Total 153
U8. Robotics cannot 7 44 85.80
measure temperatures. 8 34 76.49
9 39 73.67
10 36 70.35
Total 153
U9. a servo can move 180 7 44 80.17
degrees. 8 34 81.63
9 39 69.37
10 36 77.01
Total 153
U10. Solar panels are 7 44 77.28
products of robotics. 8 34 90.41
9 39 66.73
10 36 75.11
Total 153
Understanding towards 7 44 69.13
Robotics Score 8 34 76.07
9 39 80.35
10 36 83.88
Total 153

Test Statisticsa,b

U7. Five volts

can be supplied U10. Solar
U6. Robotics to a 1.5-volt LED U8. Robotics U9. a servo can panels are Understanding
makes things through a 220- cannot measure move 180 products of towards Robotics
autonomous. ohm resistor. temperatures. degrees. robotics. Score

Chi-Square 2.849 .748 3.104 2.070 5.758 2.522

df 3 3 3 3 3 3
Asymp. Sig. .415 .862 .376 .558 .124 .471

a. Kruskal Wallis Test

b. Grouping Variable: Grade Level
68
 69

Perception towards Robotics Score * Sex

Perception towards Robotics Score

Sex Mean N Std. Deviation

Male 3.8750 72 .64300

Female 3.6926 81 .68187
Total 3.7784 153 .66796

Report

P3. I think
P1. I am not P2. I think I have robotics can P4. Robotics can
interested in skills for develop my help me have a P5. Robotics is a
Sex robotics. robotics. creativity. bright future. new adventure.

Male Mean 1.88 2.97 4.07 3.79 4.32

N 72 72 72 72 72

Std. Deviation .992 1.021 .909 1.006 .853

Female Mean 2.11 2.70 3.88 3.72 4.19
N 81 81 81 81 81
Std. Deviation 1.095 1.018 .954 .898 1.001
Total Mean 2.00 2.83 3.97 3.75 4.25

N 153 153 153 153 153

Std. Deviation 1.051 1.025 .935 .948 .934

 70

Report

P9. I think
P8. I think robotics will P10. Robotics
P6. I think P7. Robotics will robotics will not improve my will make me
robotics will be only give me be worth learnings as a enjoy going to
Sex fun. headache. spending for. student. school.

Male Mean 4.18 2.37 2.33 3.96 4.04

N 72 72 72 72 72

Std. Deviation .969 1.156 1.101 .985 1.041

Female Mean 3.89 2.59 2.32 3.99 3.59
N 81 81 81 81 81
Std. Deviation 1.107 1.222 1.223 1.124 1.116
Total Mean 4.03 2.49 2.33 3.97 3.80

N 153 153 153 153 153

Std. Deviation 1.051 1.193 1.163 1.057 1.101

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Sex Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
P1. I am not interested in Male .255 72 .000 .792 72 .000
robotics. Female .219 81 .000 .843 81 .000
P2. I think I have skills for Male .191 72 .000 .905 72 .000
robotics. Female .212 81 .000 .901 81 .000
P3. I think robotics can Male .247 72 .000 .828 72 .000
develop my creativity. Female .268 81 .000 .857 81 .000
P4. Robotics can help me Male .263 72 .000 .848 72 .000
have a bright future. Female .229 81 .000 .878 81 .000
P5. Robotics is a new Male .301 72 .000 .748 72 .000
adventure. Female .286 81 .000 .777 81 .000
P6. I think robotics will be Male .259 72 .000 .780 72 .000
fun. Female .219 81 .000 .847 81 .000
P7. Robotics will only give Male .224 72 .000 .883 72 .000
me headache. Female .229 81 .000 .892 81 .000
P8. I think robotics will not be Male .175 72 .000 .881 72 .000
worth spending for. Female .258 81 .000 .856 81 .000
P9. I think robotics will Male .281 72 .000 .830 72 .000
improve my learnings as a Female
.282 81 .000 .787 81 .000
student.
P10. Robotics will make me Male .248 72 .000 .813 72 .000
enjoy going to school. Female .247 81 .000 .884 81 .000
Level of Perception towards Male .264 72 .000 .811 72 .000
Robotics Female .238 81 .000 .846 81 .000
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
 71

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks

Sex N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

P1. I am not interested in Male 72 72.25 5202.00

robotics. Female 81 81.22 6579.00

Total 153
P2. I think I have skills for Male 72 83.07 5981.00
robotics. Female 81 71.60 5800.00
Total 153
P3. I think robotics can develop Male 72 81.64 5878.00
my creativity. Female 81 72.88 5903.00
Total 153
P4. Robotics can help me have Male 72 79.67 5736.50
a bright future. Female 81 74.62 6044.50
Total 153
P5. Robotics is a new Male 72 79.14 5698.00
adventure. Female 81 75.10 6083.00

Total 153

Test Statisticsa

P1. I am not P3. I think robotics P4. Robotics can

interested in P2. I think I have can develop my help me have a P5. Robotics is a
robotics. skills for robotics. creativity. bright future. new adventure.

Mann-Whitney U 2574.000 2479.000 2582.000 2723.500 2762.000

Wilcoxon W 5202.000 5800.000 5903.000 6044.500 6083.000
Z -1.323 -1.662 -1.299 -.741 -.615
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .186 .097 .194 .459 .539

a. Grouping Variable: Sex

 72

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks

Sex N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

P6. I think robotics will be fun. Male 72 82.92 5970.00

Female 81 71.74 5811.00

Total 153
P7. Robotics will only give me Male 72 73.09 5262.50
headache. Female 81 80.48 6518.50
Total 153
P8. I think robotics will not be Male 72 78.32 5639.00
worth spending for. Female 81 75.83 6142.00
Total 153
P9. I think robotics will improve Male 72 74.94 5395.50
my learnings as a student. Female 81 78.83 6385.50
Total 153
P10. Robotics will make me Male 72 86.69 6241.50
enjoy going to school. Female 81 68.39 5539.50
Total 153
Level of Perception towards Male 72 84.53 6086.00
Robotics Female 81 70.31 5695.00

Total 153

Test Statisticsa

P6. I think P7. Robotics P8. I think P9. I think robotics P10. Robotics Level of
robotics will will only give robotics will not will improve my will make me Perception
be fun. me headache. be worth learnings as a enjoy going to towards
spending for. student. school. Robotics

Mann-Whitney U 2490.000 2634.500 2821.000 2767.500 2218.500 2374.000

Wilcoxon W 5811.000 5262.500 6142.000 5395.500 5539.500 5695.000
Z -1.651 -1.064 -.360 -.578 -2.669 -2.129
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .099 .287 .719 .563 .008 .033

a. Grouping Variable: Sex

 73

Perception towards Robotics Score * Grade Level

Perception towards Robotics Score

Grade Level Mean N Std. Deviation

7 3.8341 44 .62392
8 3.6235 34 .73198
9 3.8333 39 .61956
10 3.7972 36 .71173
Total 3.7784 153 .66796

Report
P3. I think
P1. I am not P2. I think I have robotics can P4. Robotics can
interested in skills for develop my help me have a P5. Robotics is a
Grade Level robotics. robotics. creativity. bright future. new adventure.
7 Mean 1.82 2.75 3.98 3.84 4.09
N 44 44 44 44 44
Std. Deviation 1.105 .918 .976 .888 .960
8 Mean 2.21 2.71 3.88 3.62 4.35
N 34 34 34 34 34
Std. Deviation 1.175 1.194 .913 1.045 .884
9 Mean 1.95 2.67 4.00 3.74 4.23
N 39 39 39 39 39
Std. Deviation .887 .927 .946 .850 .931
10 Mean 2.08 3.22 4.00 3.78 4.36
N 36 36 36 36 36
Std. Deviation 1.025 1.017 .926 1.045 .961
Total Mean 2.00 2.83 3.97 3.75 4.25
N 153 153 153 153 153
Std. Deviation 1.051 1.025 .935 .948 .934

Report

P6. I think P7. Robotics P8. I think P9. I think P10. Robotics Perception
robotics will will only give robotics will robotics will will make me towards
be fun. me headache. not be worth improve my enjoy going to Robotics
spending for. learnings as a school. Score
Grade Level student.
7 Mean
4.09 2.20 2.30 4.02 3.89 3.8341

N
44 44 44 44 44 44

Std. Deviation
1.053 1.133 1.212 1.089 1.104 .62392
8 Mean
3.88 2.68 2.56 3.62 3.62 3.6235
N
34 34 34 34 34 34
Std. Deviation
1.122 1.408 1.160 1.206 1.256 .73198
9 Mean 4.15 2.41 2.03 4.03 3.90 3.8333
 74

N
39 39 39 39 39 39
Std. Deviation
.875 .993 .986 1.013 .968 .61956
10 Mean
3.94 2.75 2.47 4.19 3.78 3.7972
N
36 36 36 36 36 36
Std. Deviation
1.170 1.204 1.253 .856 1.098 .71173
Total Mean
4.03 2.49 2.33 3.97 3.80 3.7784

N
153 153 153 153 153 153

Std. Deviation
1.051 1.193 1.163 1.057 1.101 .66796

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Grade Level Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
P1. I am not interested in 7 .316 44 .000 .714 44 .000
robotics. 8 .275 34 .000 .836 34 .000
9 .221 39 .000 .841 39 .000
10 .227 36 .000 .855 36 .000
P2. I think I have skills for 7 .312 44 .000 .834 44 .000
robotics. 8 .193 34 .002 .909 34 .008
9 .251 39 .000 .860 39 .000
10 .250 36 .000 .835 36 .000
P3. I think robotics can 7 .282 44 .000 .828 44 .000
develop my creativity. 8 .198 34 .002 .862 34 .001
9 .218 39 .000 .843 39 .000
10 .333 36 .000 .779 36 .000
P4. Robotics can help me 7 .230 44 .000 .867 44 .000
have a bright future. 8 .202 34 .001 .874 34 .001
9 .260 39 .000 .868 39 .000
10 .279 36 .000 .861 36 .000
P5. Robotics is a new 7 .258 44 .000 .810 44 .000
adventure. 8 .327 34 .000 .731 34 .000
9 .283 39 .000 .770 39 .000
10 .358 36 .000 .692 36 .000
P6. I think robotics will be 7 .283 44 .000 .788 44 .000
fun. 8 .277 34 .000 .825 34 .000
9 .244 39 .000 .816 39 .000
10 .241 36 .000 .816 36 .000
P7. Robotics will only give 7 .197 44 .000 .862 44 .000
me headache. 8 .214 34 .000 .869 34 .001
9 .250 39 .000 .870 39 .000
10 .261 36 .000 .872 36 .001
P8. I think robotics will not be 7 .221 44 .000 .842 44 .000
worth spending for. 8 .273 34 .000 .871 34 .001
9 .228 39 .000 .838 39 .000
10 .258 36 .000 .867 36 .000
P9. I think robotics will 7 .287 44 .000 .790 44 .000
improve my learnings as a 8 .213 34 .000 .874 34 .001
student. 9 .310 39 .000 .771 39 .000
10 .271 36 .000 .761 36 .000
 75

P10. Robotics will make me 7 .223 44 .000 .850 44 .000

enjoy going to school. 8 .267 34 .000 .858 34 .000
9 .260 39 .000 .853 39 .000
10 .247 36 .000 .836 36 .000
Level of Perception towards 7 .249 44 .000 .832 44 .000
Robotics 8 .251 34 .000 .859 34 .000
9 .232 39 .000 .811 39 .000
10 .265 36 .000 .838 36 .000
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
 76

NPar Tests

Kruskal-Wallis Test

Ranks
Grade Level N Mean Rank
P1. I am not interested in 7 44 67.17
robotics. 8 34 84.15
9 39 77.55
10 36 81.67
Total 153
P2. I think I have skills for 7 44 75.02
robotics. 8 34 71.82
9 39 69.95
10 36 91.94
Total 153
P3. I think robotics can develop 7 44 78.25
my creativity. 8 34 71.76
9 39 78.42
10 36 78.88
Total 153
P4. Robotics can help me have 7 44 80.19
a bright future. 8 34 71.49
9 39 75.59
10 36 79.83
Total 153
P5. Robotics is a new 7 44 68.68
adventure. 8 34 81.66
9 39 75.86
10 36 84.00
Total 153

Test Statisticsa,b

P1. I am not P3. I think robotics P4. Robotics can

interested in P2. I think I have can develop my help me have a P5. Robotics is a
robotics. skills for robotics. creativity. bright future. new adventure.

Chi-Square 3.867 6.096 .696 1.044 3.401

df 3 3 3 3 3
Asymp. Sig. .276 .107 .874 .791 .334

a. Kruskal Wallis Test

b. Grouping Variable: Grade Level
 77

Kruskal-Wallis Test

Ranks
Grade Level N Mean Rank
P6. I think robotics will be fun. 7 44 80.20
8 34 71.16
9 39 79.97
10 36 75.38
Total 153
P7. Robotics will only give me 7 44 66.85
headache. 8 34 81.44
9 39 75.95
10 36 86.35
Total 153
P8. I think robotics will not be 7 44 75.74
worth spending for. 8 34 85.75
9 39 66.68
10 36 81.46
Total 153
P9. I think robotics will improve 7 44 79.88
my learnings as a student. 8 34 64.31
9 39 78.26
10 36 84.11
Total 153
P10. Robotics will make me 7 44 80.44
enjoy going to school. 8 34 71.57
9 39 78.97
10 36 75.78
Total 153
Level of Perception towards 7 44 81.24
Robotics 8 34 69.54
9 39 76.88
10 36 78.99
Total 153

Test Statisticsa,b

P6. I think P7. Robotics P8. I think P9. I think robotics P10. Robotics Level of
robotics will only give robotics will not will improve my will make me Perception
will be fun. me headache. be worth learnings as a enjoy going to towards
spending for. student. school. Robotics

Chi-Square 1.174 4.567 4.128 4.465 .965 1.660

df 3 3 3 3 3 3

Asymp. Sig. .759 .206 .248 .215 .810 .646

a. Kruskal Wallis Test

 78

b. Grouping Variable: Grade Level

Sex * Level of understanding towards Robotics

Sex * Level of understanding towards Robotics Crosstabulation

Level of understanding towards Robotics
Somewhat Cannot Say True
untrue or False Somewhat true Absolutely true Total
Sex Male Count 0 5 54 13 72
% within Sex 0.0% 6.9% 75.0% 18.1% 100.0%
Female Count 1 7 56 17 81
% within Sex 1.2% 8.6% 69.1% 21.0% 100.0%
Total Count 1 12 110 30 153
% within Sex 0.7% 7.8% 71.9% 19.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.378a 3 .711
Likelihood Ratio 1.763 3 .623
Linear-by-Linear Association .020 1 .888
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .47.

Sex * Level of understanding towards Robotics (Readjusted)

Sex * Level of understanding towards Robotics Crosstabulation
Level of understanding towards
Robotics
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 5 67 72
% within Sex 6.9% 93.1% 100.0%
Female Count 8 73 81
% within Sex 9.9% 90.1% 100.0%
Total Count 13 140 153
% within Sex 8.5% 91.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .421a 1 .516
b
Continuity Correction .129 1 .720
Likelihood Ratio .426 1 .514
Fisher's Exact Test .573 .362
Linear-by-Linear Association .419 1 .518
N of Valid Cases 153
 79

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.12.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * U1. Robotics is the study of robots.
Crosstab

U1. Robotics is the study of robots. Total

Cannot Say
Absolutely Somewhat True or Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue False true true
Sex Male Count
1 1 5 21 44 72

% within Sex
1.4% 1.4% 6.9% 29.2% 61.1% 100.0%

Female Count
1 2 4 24 50 81

% within Sex
1.2% 2.5% 4.9% 29.6% 61.7% 100.0%
Total Count
2 3 9 45 94 153

% within Sex
1.3% 2.0% 5.9% 29.4% 61.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .500a 4 .974
Likelihood Ratio .505 4 .973
Linear-by-Linear Association .005 1 .943
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 6 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .94.

Sex * U1. Robotics is the study of robots (Readjusted)

Sex * U1. Robotics is the study of robots. Crosstabulation

U1. Robotics is the study of
robots.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 7 65 72
% within Sex 9.7% 90.3% 100.0%
Female Count 7 74 81
% within Sex 8.6% 91.4% 100.0%
Total Count 14 139 153
% within Sex 9.2% 90.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
 80

Pearson Chi-Square .054a 1 .817

b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .053 1 .817
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .518
Linear-by-Linear Association .053 1 .818
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.59.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * U2. Robots can be of any form and not necessarily resemble a human.
Crosstab

U2. Robots can be of any form and not necessarily resemble a human. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
0 1 14 25 32 72

% within Sex
0.0% 1.4% 19.4% 34.7% 44.4% 100.0%

Female Count
1 5 12 33 30 81

% within Sex
1.2% 6.2% 14.8% 40.7% 37.0% 100.0%
Total Count
1 6 26 58 62 153

% within Sex
0.7% 3.9% 17.0% 37.9% 40.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.475a 4 .346
Likelihood Ratio 5.093 4 .278
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.263 1 .261
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .47.

Sex * U2. Robots can be of any form and not necessarily resemble a human (Readjusted)

Sex * U2. Robots can be of any form and not necessarily resemble a human.
Crosstabulation
U2. Robots can be of any form and
not necessarily resemble a human.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 15 57 72
% within Sex 20.8% 79.2% 100.0%
Female Count 18 63 81
% within Sex 22.2% 77.8% 100.0%
 81

Total Count 33 120 153

% within Sex 21.6% 78.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .043a 1 .835
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 .991
Likelihood Ratio .044 1 .835
Fisher's Exact Test .847 .496
Linear-by-Linear Association .043 1 .835
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.53.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * U3. Robotics is a combination of Science, Math and Engineering.
Crosstab

U3. Robotics is a combination of Science, Math and Engineering. Total

Absolutely Cannot Say True
untrue or False Somewhat true Absolutely true
Sex Male Count
0 4 13 55 72

% within Sex
0.0% 5.6% 18.1% 76.4% 100.0%

Female Count
1 3 21 56 81

% within Sex
1.2% 3.7% 25.9% 69.1% 100.0%
Total Count
1 7 34 111 153

% within Sex
0.7% 4.6% 22.2% 72.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.514a 3 .473
Likelihood Ratio 2.909 3 .406
Linear-by-Linear Association .796 1 .372
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .47.

Sex * U3. Robotics is a combination of Science, Math and Engineering(Readjusted)

Sex * U3. Robotics is a combination of Science, Math and Engineering.

Crosstabulation
 82

U3. Robotics is a combination of

Science, Math and Engineering.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 4 68 72
% within Sex 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%
Female Count 4 77 81
% within Sex 4.9% 95.1% 100.0%
Total Count 8 145 153
% within Sex 5.2% 94.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .029a 1 .864
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .029 1 .864
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .573
Linear-by-Linear Association .029 1 .865
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.76.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * U4. Robotics Engineering creates machines that can perform tasks
that human repeatedly do.
Crosstab
U4. Robotics Engineering creates machines that can
perform tasks that human repreatedly do. Total
Cannot Say
Absolutely True or Somewhat Absolutely
untrue False true true
Sex Male Count
0 11 26 35 72

% within Sex
0.0% 15.3% 36.1% 48.6% 100.0%

Female Count
1 6 30 44 81

% within Sex
1.2% 7.4% 37.0% 54.3% 100.0%
Total Count
1 17 56 79 153

% within Sex
0.7% 11.1% 36.6% 51.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.263a 3 .353
Likelihood Ratio 3.663 3 .300
Linear-by-Linear Association .687 1 .407
N of Valid Cases 153
 83

a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .47.

Sex * U4. Robotics Engineering creates machines that can perform tasks that human repeatedly do (Readjusted)

U4. Robotics Engineering creates

machines that can perform tasks
that human repreatedly do.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 11 61 72
% within Sex 15.3% 84.7% 100.0%
Female Count 7 74 81
% within Sex 8.6% 91.4% 100.0%
Total Count 18 135 153
% within Sex 11.8% 88.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.617a 1 .204
b
Continuity Correction 1.041 1 .308
Likelihood Ratio 1.620 1 .203
Fisher's Exact Test .220 .154
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.606 1 .205
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.47.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Sex * U5. Robots are controlled by sets of codes and computerlanguage

commands.

Crosstab
U5. Robots are controlled by sets of codes and computerlanguage
commands. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
0 1 3 25 43 72

% within Sex
0.0% 1.4% 4.2% 34.7% 59.7% 100.0%

Female Count
1 1 2 25 52 81

% within Sex
1.2% 1.2% 2.5% 30.9% 64.2% 100.0%
Total Count
1 2 5 50 95 153

% within Sex
0.7% 1.3% 3.3% 32.7% 62.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
 84

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.529a 4 .822
Likelihood Ratio 1.912 4 .752
Linear-by-Linear Association .062 1 .803
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 6 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .47.

Sex * U5. Robots are controlled by sets of codes and computer language commands (Readjusted)

U5. Robots are controlled by sets

of codes and computerlanguage
commands.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 4 68 72
% within Sex 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%
Female Count 4 77 81
% within Sex 4.9% 95.1% 100.0%
Total Count 8 145 153
% within Sex 5.2% 94.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .029a 1 .864
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .029 1 .864
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .573
Linear-by-Linear Association .029 1 .865
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.76.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * U6. Robotics makes things autonomous.
Crosstab

U6. Robotics makes things autonomous. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
1 5 20 19 27 72

% within Sex
1.4% 6.9% 27.8% 26.4% 37.5% 100.0%

Female Count
1 2 20 32 26 81

% within Sex
1.2% 2.5% 24.7% 39.5% 32.1% 100.0%
Total Count 2 7 40 51 53 153
 85

% within Sex
1.3% 4.6% 26.1% 33.3% 34.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.103a 4 .392
Likelihood Ratio 4.168 4 .384
Linear-by-Linear Association .211 1 .646
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .94.

Sex * U6. Robotics makes things autonomous (Readjusted)

U6. Robotics makes things

autonomous.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 26 46 72
% within Sex 36.1% 63.9% 100.0%
Female Count 23 58 81
% within Sex 28.4% 71.6% 100.0%
Total Count 49 104 153
% within Sex 32.0% 68.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.042a 1 .307
b
Continuity Correction .718 1 .397
Likelihood Ratio 1.042 1 .307
Fisher's Exact Test .386 .198
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.036 1 .309
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.06.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * U7. Five volts can be supplied to a 1.5-volt LED through a 220-ohm resistor.
Crosstab

U7. Five volts can be supplied to a 1.5-volt LED through a 220-ohm resistor. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say True Somewhat
untrue untrue or False true Absolutely true
Sex Male Count
1 7 32 20 12 72

% within Sex 1.4% 9.7% 44.4% 27.8% 16.7% 100.0%

 86

Female Count
1 5 35 28 12 81

% within Sex
1.2% 6.2% 43.2% 34.6% 14.8% 100.0%
Total Count
2 12 67 48 24 153

% within Sex
1.3% 7.8% 43.8% 31.4% 15.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.276a 4 .865
Likelihood Ratio 1.279 4 .865
Linear-by-Linear Association .229 1 .632
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .94.

Sex * U7. Five volts can be supplied to a 1.5-volt LED through a 220-ohm resistor (Readjusted)
Sex * U7. Five volts can be supplied to a 1.5-volt LED through a 220-ohm
resistor. Crosstabulation
U7. Five volts can be supplied to a
1.5-volt LED through a 220-ohm
resistor.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 40 32 72
% within Sex 55.6% 44.4% 100.0%
Female Count 41 40 81
% within Sex 50.6% 49.4% 100.0%
Total Count 81 72 153
% within Sex 52.9% 47.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .373a 1 .541
b
Continuity Correction .201 1 .654
Likelihood Ratio .373 1 .541
Fisher's Exact Test .627 .327
Linear-by-Linear Association .371 1 .543
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 33.88.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Sex * U8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures.

Crosstab
 87

U8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
17 16 31 3 5 72

% within Sex
23.6% 22.2% 43.1% 4.2% 6.9% 100.0%

Female Count
11 20 37 9 4 81

% within Sex
13.6% 24.7% 45.7% 11.1% 4.9% 100.0%
Total Count
28 36 68 12 9 153

% within Sex
18.3% 23.5% 44.4% 7.8% 5.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.858a 4 .302
Likelihood Ratio 4.992 4 .288
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.428 1 .232
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 4.24.

Sex * U8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures (Readjusted)

Sex * U8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures. Crosstabulation
U8. Robotics cannot measure
temperatures.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 64 8 72
% within Sex 88.9% 11.1% 100.0%
Female Count 68 13 81
% within Sex 84.0% 16.0% 100.0%
Total Count 132 21 153
% within Sex 86.3% 13.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .785a 1 .376
b
Continuity Correction .423 1 .515
Likelihood Ratio .794 1 .373
Fisher's Exact Test .482 .259
Linear-by-Linear Association .780 1 .377
 88

N of Valid Cases 153

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.88.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Sex * U9. a servo can move 180 degrees.

Crosstab
U9. a servo can move 180 degrees. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count 1 5 37 20 9 72
% within Sex 1.4% 6.9% 51.4% 27.8% 12.5% 100.0%
Female Count 1 8 40 24 8 81
% within Sex 1.2% 9.9% 49.4% 29.6% 9.9% 100.0%
Total Count 2 13 77 44 17 153
% within Sex 1.3% 8.5% 50.3% 28.8% 11.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .705a 4 .951
Likelihood Ratio .709 4 .950
Linear-by-Linear Association .193 1 .660
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .94.

Sex * U9. a servo can move 180 degrees (Readjusted)

Sex * U9. a servo can move 180 degrees. Crosstabulation
U9. a servo can move 180
degrees.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 43 29 72
% within Sex 59.7% 40.3% 100.0%
Female Count 49 32 81
% within Sex 60.5% 39.5% 100.0%
Total Count 92 61 153
% within Sex 60.1% 39.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .009a 1 .922
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .009 1 .922
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .527
Linear-by-Linear Association .009 1 .923
 89

N of Valid Cases 153

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Sex * U10. Solar panels are products of robotics.

Crosstab
U10. Solar panels are products of robotics. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count 2 7 19 24 20 72
% within Sex 2.8% 9.7% 26.4% 33.3% 27.8% 100.0%
Female Count 2 5 19 25 30 81
% within Sex 2.5% 6.2% 23.5% 30.9% 37.0% 100.0%
Total Count 4 12 38 49 50 153
% within Sex 2.6% 7.8% 24.8% 32.0% 32.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.831a 4 .767
Likelihood Ratio 1.839 4 .765
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.407 1 .235
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1.88.

Sex * U10. Solar panels are products of robotics (Readjusted)

Sex * U10. Solar panels are products of robotics. Crosstabulation
U10. Solar panels are products of
robotics.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 28 44 72
% within Sex 38.9% 61.1% 100.0%
Female Count 26 55 81
% within Sex 32.1% 67.9% 100.0%
Total Count 54 99 153
% within Sex 35.3% 64.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .770a 1 .380
b
Continuity Correction .501 1 .479
Likelihood Ratio .769 1 .380
Fisher's Exact Test .401 .239
 90

Linear-by-Linear Association .765 1 .382

N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 25.41.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Grade Level * Level of understanding towards Robotics

Grade Level * Level of understanding towards Robotics Crosstabulation

Level of understanding towards Robotics Total

Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 0 5 31 8 44

% within Grade Level

0.0% 11.4% 70.5% 18.2% 100.0%

8 Count
0 3 26 5 34

% within Grade Level

0.0% 8.8% 76.5% 14.7% 100.0%

9 Count
1 2 29 7 39

% within Grade Level

2.6% 5.1% 74.4% 17.9% 100.0%

10 Count
0 2 24 10 36

% within Grade Level

0.0% 5.6% 66.7% 27.8% 100.0%
Total Count
1 12 110 30 153

% within Grade Level

0.7% 7.8% 71.9% 19.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.291a 9 .710
Likelihood Ratio 5.995 9 .740
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.403 1 .236
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .22.

Grade Level * Level of understanding towards Robotics (Readjusted)

Grade Level * Level of understanding towards Robotics Crosstabulation
Level of understanding towards
Robotics
Not positive Positive Total
 91

Grade Level 7 Count 5 39 44

% within Grade Level 11.4% 88.6% 100.0%
8 Count 3 31 34
% within Grade Level 8.8% 91.2% 100.0%
9 Count 3 36 39
% within Grade Level 7.7% 92.3% 100.0%
10 Count 2 34 36
% within Grade Level 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%
Total Count 13 140 153
% within Grade Level 8.5% 91.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .903a 3 .825
Likelihood Ratio .914 3 .822
Linear-by-Linear Association .882 1 .348
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 2.89.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

Understanding
towards
Grade Level Robotics Score

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .127

Sig. (2-tailed) . .116

N 153 153

Understanding towards Correlation Coefficient .127 1.000

Robotics Score Sig. (2-tailed) .116 .

N 153 153
 92

Grade Level * U1. Robotics is the study of robots.

Crosstab
U1. Robotics is the study of robots. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say True Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue or False true true
Grade 7 Count 0 0 3 11 30 44
Level % within Grade Level 0.0% 0.0% 6.8% 25.0% 68.2% 100.0%
8 Count 1 1 0 7 25 34
% within Grade Level 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 20.6% 73.5% 100.0%
9 Count 1 1 5 12 20 39
% within Grade Level 2.6% 2.6% 12.8% 30.8% 51.3% 100.0%
10 Count 0 1 1 15 19 36
% within Grade Level 0.0% 2.8% 2.8% 41.7% 52.8% 100.0%
Total Count 2 3 9 45 94 153
% within Grade Level 1.3% 2.0% 5.9% 29.4% 61.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 14.566a 12 .266
Likelihood Ratio 17.384 12 .136
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.255 1 .133
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .44.

Grade Level * U1. Robotics is the study of robots (Readjusted)

Grade Level * U1. Robotics is the study of robots. Crosstabulation

U1. Robotics is the study of

robots.

Not positive Positive Total

Grade Level 7 Count 3 41 44

% within Grade Level 6.8% 93.2% 100.0%

8 Count 2 32 34

% within Grade Level 5.9% 94.1% 100.0%

9 Count 7 32 39

% within Grade Level 17.9% 82.1% 100.0%

10 Count 2 34 36

% within Grade Level 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%

Total Count 14 139 153

% within Grade Level 9.2% 90.8% 100.0%

 93

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.916a 3 .178

Likelihood Ratio 4.363 3 .225
Linear-by-Linear Association .211 1 .646
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 3.11.

Nonparametric Correlations
Correlations
U1. Robotics is
the study of
Grade Level robots.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.146
Sig. (2-tailed) . .071
N 153 153
U1. Robotics is the study of Correlation Coefficient -.146 1.000
robots. Sig. (2-tailed) .071 .
N 153 153
 94

Grade Level * U2. Robots can be of any form and not necessarily resemble
a human.

Crosstab
U2. Robots can be of any form and not necessarily resemble a
human. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 1 2 11 16 14 44
Level % within Grade Level 2.3% 4.5% 25.0% 36.4% 31.8% 100.0%
8 Count 0 2 7 12 13 34
% within Grade Level 0.0% 5.9% 20.6% 35.3% 38.2% 100.0%
9 Count 0 1 7 14 17 39
% within Grade Level 0.0% 2.6% 17.9% 35.9% 43.6% 100.0%
10 Count 0 1 1 16 18 36
% within Grade Level 0.0% 2.8% 2.8% 44.4% 50.0% 100.0%
Total Count 1 6 26 58 62 153
% within Grade Level 0.7% 3.9% 17.0% 37.9% 40.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 11.669a 12 .473
Likelihood Ratio 13.770 12 .316
Linear-by-Linear Association 7.006 1 .008
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .22.

Grade Level * U2. Robots can be of any form and not necessarily resemble
a human (Readjusted)

U2. Robots can be of any form and

not necessarily resemble a human.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 14 30 44
% within Grade Level 31.8% 68.2% 100.0%
8 Count 9 25 34
% within Grade Level 26.5% 73.5% 100.0%
9 Count 8 31 39
% within Grade Level 20.5% 79.5% 100.0%
10 Count 2 34 36
% within Grade Level 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%
Total Count 33 120 153
% within Grade Level 21.6% 78.4% 100.0%
 95

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 8.698a 3 .034

Likelihood Ratio 10.177 3 .017
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.041 1 .005
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 7.33.

Nonparametric Correlations
Correlations
U2. Robots can be
of any form and
not necessarily
resemble a
Grade Level human.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .203*
Sig. (2-tailed) . .012
N 153 153
U2. Robots can be of any form Correlation Coefficient .203* 1.000
and not necessarily resemble a Sig. (2-tailed) .012 .
human. N 153 153
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
 96

Grade Level * U3. Robotics is a combination of Science, Math and

Engineering.

Crosstab

U3. Robotics is a combination of Science, Math and Engineering. Total

Absolutely Cannot Say True Somewhat Absolutely
untrue or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 0 4 10 30 44

% within Grade Level

0.0% 9.1% 22.7% 68.2% 100.0%

8 Count
0 0 8 26 34

% within Grade Level

0.0% 0.0% 23.5% 76.5% 100.0%

9 Count
1 1 9 28 39

% within Grade Level

2.6% 2.6% 23.1% 71.8% 100.0%

10 Count
0 2 7 27 36

% within Grade Level

0.0% 5.6% 19.4% 75.0% 100.0%
Total Count
1 7 34 111 153

% within Grade Level

0.7% 4.6% 22.2% 72.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.250a 9 .611
Likelihood Ratio 8.241 9 .510
Linear-by-Linear Association .181 1 .670
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .22.

Grade Level * U3. Robotics is a combination of Science, Math and

Engineering (Readjusted)

Grade Level * U3. Robotics is a combination of Science, Math and Engineering.

Crosstabulation
U3. Robotics is a combination of
Science, Math and Engineering.
Not positive Positive Total
 97

Grade Level 7 Count 4 40 44

% within Grade Level 9.1% 90.9% 100.0%
8 Count 0 34 34
% within Grade Level 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%
9 Count 2 37 39
% within Grade Level 5.1% 94.9% 100.0%
10 Count 2 34 36
% within Grade Level 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%
Total Count 8 145 153
% within Grade Level 5.2% 94.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.209a 3 .361
Likelihood Ratio 4.757 3 .191
Linear-by-Linear Association .229 1 .632
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 1.78.

Nonparametric Correlations
Correlations
U3. Robotics is a
combination of
Science, Math and
Grade Level Engineering.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .047
Sig. (2-tailed) . .566
N 153 153
U3. Robotics is a combination of Correlation Coefficient .047 1.000
Science, Math and Engineering. Sig. (2-tailed) .566 .
N 153 153
 98

Grade Level * U4. Robotics Engineering creates machines that can perform
tasks that human repeatedly do.

Crosstab
U4. Robotics Engineering creates machines that can
perform tasks that human repeatedly do. Total
Absolutely Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 0 10 15 19 44

% within Grade Level

0.0% 22.7% 34.1% 43.2% 100.0%

8 Count
0 3 11 20 34

% within Grade Level

0.0% 8.8% 32.4% 58.8% 100.0%

9 Count
1 2 15 21 39

% within Grade Level

2.6% 5.1% 38.5% 53.8% 100.0%

10 Count
0 2 15 19 36

% within Grade Level

0.0% 5.6% 41.7% 52.8% 100.0%
Total Count
1 17 56 79 153

% within Grade Level

0.7% 11.1% 36.6% 51.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12.211a 9 .202
Likelihood Ratio 11.344 9 .253
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.150 1 .143
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .22.

Grade Level * U4. Robotics Engineering creates machines that can perform
tasks that human repeatedly do (Readjusted)
Grade Level * U4. Robotics Engineering creates machines that can perform tasks that human
repreatedly do. Crosstabulation
U4. Robotics Engineering creates
machines that can perform tasks
that human repreatedly do.
Not positive Positive Total
 99

Grade Level 7 Count 10 34 44

% within Grade Level 22.7% 77.3% 100.0%
8 Count 3 31 34
% within Grade Level 8.8% 91.2% 100.0%
9 Count 3 36 39
% within Grade Level 7.7% 92.3% 100.0%
10 Count 2 34 36
% within Grade Level 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%
Total Count 18 135 153
% within Grade Level 11.8% 88.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.337a 3 .062

Likelihood Ratio 6.777 3 .079
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.734 1 .017
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 3 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 4.00.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations
U4. Robotics
Engineering
creates machines
that can perform
tasks that human
Grade Level repreatedly do.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .111
Sig. (2-tailed) . .173
N 153 153
U4. Robotics Engineering Correlation Coefficient .111 1.000
creates machines that can Sig. (2-tailed) .173 .
perform tasks that human N
repreatedly do. 153 153
 100

Grade Level * U5. Robots are controlled by sets of codes and computer
language commands.

Crosstab
U5. Robots are controlled by sets of codes and computerlanguage
commands. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 0 0 2 16 26 44

% within Grade Level

0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 36.4% 59.1% 100.0%

8 Count
0 1 1 11 21 34

% within Grade Level

0.0% 2.9% 2.9% 32.4% 61.8% 100.0%

9 Count
1 0 1 13 24 39

% within Grade Level

2.6% 0.0% 2.6% 33.3% 61.5% 100.0%

10 Count
0 1 1 10 24 36

% within Grade Level

0.0% 2.8% 2.8% 27.8% 66.7% 100.0%
Total Count
1 2 5 50 95 153

% within Grade Level

0.7% 1.3% 3.3% 32.7% 62.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.256a 12 .903
Likelihood Ratio 6.809 12 .870
Linear-by-Linear Association .029 1 .864
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .22.

Grade Level * U5. Robots are controlled by sets of codes and computer
language commands (Readjusted)

U5. Robots are controlled by sets

of codes and computerlanguage
commands.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 2 42 44
 101

% within Grade Level 4.5% 95.5% 100.0%

8 Count 2 32 34
% within Grade Level 5.9% 94.1% 100.0%
9 Count 2 37 39
% within Grade Level 5.1% 94.9% 100.0%
10 Count 2 34 36
% within Grade Level 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%
Total Count 8 145 153
% within Grade Level 5.2% 94.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .079 3 .994
Likelihood Ratio .080 3 .994
Linear-by-Linear Association .025 1 .874
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 1.78.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations
U5. Robots are
controlled by sets
of codes and
computerlanguage
Grade Level commands.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .046
Sig. (2-tailed) . .575
N 153 153
U5. Robots are controlled by Correlation Coefficient .046 1.000
sets of codes and Sig. (2-tailed) .575 .
computerlanguage commands. N 153 153
 102

Grade Level * U6. Robotics makes things autonomous.

Crosstab
U6. Robotics makes things autonomous. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say True Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue or False true true
Grade 7 Count 0 0 20 11 13 44
Level % within Grade Level 0.0% 0.0% 45.5% 25.0% 29.5% 100.0%
8 Count 1 2 6 14 11 34
% within Grade Level 2.9% 5.9% 17.6% 41.2% 32.4% 100.0%
9 Count 1 0 9 12 17 39
% within Grade Level 2.6% 0.0% 23.1% 30.8% 43.6% 100.0%
10 Count 0 5 5 14 12 36
% within Grade Level 0.0% 13.9% 13.9% 38.9% 33.3% 100.0%
Total Count 2 7 40 51 53 153
% within Grade Level 1.3% 4.6% 26.1% 33.3% 34.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 25.640a 12 .012
Likelihood Ratio 27.149 12 .007
Linear-by-Linear Association .456 1 .500
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .44.

Grade Level * U6. Robotics makes things autonomous (Readjusted)

U6. Robotics makes things

autonomous.

Not positive Positive Total

Grade Level 7 Count 20 24 44

% within Grade Level 45.5% 54.5% 100.0%

8 Count 9 25 34

% within Grade Level 26.5% 73.5% 100.0%

9 Count 10 29 39

% within Grade Level 25.6% 74.4% 100.0%

10 Count 10 26 36

% within Grade Level 27.8% 72.2% 100.0%

Total Count 49 104 153

% within Grade Level 32.0% 68.0% 100.0%

 103

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.156a 3 .161

Likelihood Ratio 5.007 3 .171
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.031 1 .082
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 10.89.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations
U6. Robotics
makes things
Grade Level autonomous.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .083
Sig. (2-tailed) . .307
N 153 153
U6. Robotics makes things Correlation Coefficient .083 1.000
autonomous. Sig. (2-tailed) .307 .
N 153 153
 104

Grade Level * U7. Five volts can be supplied to a 1.5-volt LED through a
220-ohm resistor.

Crosstab

U7. Five volts can be supplied to a 1.5-volt LED through a 220-ohm

resistor. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say True Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 0 2 22 13 7 44

% within Grade Level

0.0% 4.5% 50.0% 29.5% 15.9% 100.0%

8 Count
1 1 17 9 6 34

% within Grade Level

2.9% 2.9% 50.0% 26.5% 17.6% 100.0%

9 Count
1 4 17 12 5 39

% within Grade Level

2.6% 10.3% 43.6% 30.8% 12.8% 100.0%

10 Count
0 5 11 14 6 36

% within Grade Level

0.0% 13.9% 30.6% 38.9% 16.7% 100.0%
Total Count 2 12 67 48 24 153
% within Grade Level 1.3% 7.8% 43.8% 31.4% 15.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.229a 12 .683
Likelihood Ratio 10.205 12 .598
Linear-by-Linear Association .026 1 .872
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .44.

Grade Level * U7. Five volts can be supplied to a 1.5-volt LED through a
220-ohm resistor (Readjusted)

U7. Five volts can be supplied to a

1.5-volt LED through a 220-ohm
resistor.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 24 20 44
% within Grade Level 54.5% 45.5% 100.0%
 105

8 Count 19 15 34
% within Grade Level 55.9% 44.1% 100.0%
9 Count 22 17 39
% within Grade Level 56.4% 43.6% 100.0%
10 Count 16 20 36
% within Grade Level 44.4% 55.6% 100.0%
Total Count 81 72 153
% within Grade Level 52.9% 47.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.395 3 .707
Likelihood Ratio 1.394 3 .707
Linear-by-Linear Association .604 1 .437
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 16.00.

Nonparametric Correlations
Correlations
U7. Five volts can
be supplied to a
1.5-volt LED
through a 220-
Grade Level ohm resistor.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .003
Sig. (2-tailed) . .968
N 153 153
U7. Five volts can be supplied to Correlation Coefficient .003 1.000
a 1.5-volt LED through a 220- Sig. (2-tailed) .968 .
ohm resistor. N 153 153
 106

Grade Level * U8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures.

Crosstab
U8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 7 6 23 6 2 44

% within Grade Level

15.9% 13.6% 52.3% 13.6% 4.5% 100.0%

8 Count
5 10 15 1 3 34

% within Grade Level

14.7% 29.4% 44.1% 2.9% 8.8% 100.0%

9 Count
7 11 17 1 3 39

% within Grade Level

17.9% 28.2% 43.6% 2.6% 7.7% 100.0%

10 Count
9 9 13 4 1 36

% within Grade Level

25.0% 25.0% 36.1% 11.1% 2.8% 100.0%
Total Count
28 36 68 12 9 153

% within Grade Level

18.3% 23.5% 44.4% 7.8% 5.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 11.406a 12 .494
Likelihood Ratio 12.110 12 .437
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.350 1 .125
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 2.00.

Grade Level * U8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures (Readjusted)

Grade Level * U8. Robotics cannot measure temperatures. Crosstabulation
U8. Robotics cannot measure
temperatures.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 36 8 44
% within Grade Level 81.8% 18.2% 100.0%
8 Count 30 4 34
% within Grade Level 88.2% 11.8% 100.0%
 107

9 Count 35 4 39
% within Grade Level 89.7% 10.3% 100.0%
10 Count 31 5 36
% within Grade Level 86.1% 13.9% 100.0%
Total Count 132 21 153
% within Grade Level 86.3% 13.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.245a 3 .742

Likelihood Ratio 1.225 3 .747
Linear-by-Linear Association .434 1 .510
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 4.67.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations
U8. Robotics
cannot measure
Grade Level temperatures.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.138
Sig. (2-tailed) . .090
N 153 153
U8. Robotics cannot measure Correlation Coefficient -.138 1.000
temperatures. Sig. (2-tailed) .090 .
N 153 153
 108

Grade Level * U9. a servo can move 180 degrees.

Crosstab
U9. a servo can move 180 degrees. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 0 2 24 13 5 44
Level % within Grade Level 0.0% 4.5% 54.5% 29.5% 11.4% 100.0%
8 Count 0 2 17 11 4 34
% within Grade Level 0.0% 5.9% 50.0% 32.4% 11.8% 100.0%
9 Count 1 3 23 10 2 39
% within Grade Level 2.6% 7.7% 59.0% 25.6% 5.1% 100.0%
10 Count 1 6 13 10 6 36
% within Grade Level 2.8% 16.7% 36.1% 27.8% 16.7% 100.0%
Total Count 2 13 77 44 17 153
% within Grade Level 1.3% 8.5% 50.3% 28.8% 11.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.786a 12 .547
Likelihood Ratio 11.436 12 .492
Linear-by-Linear Association .812 1 .368
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .44.

Grade Level * U9. a servo can move 180 degrees (Readjusted)

U9. a servo can move 180

degrees.

Not positive Positive Total

Grade Level 7 Count 26 18 44

% within Grade Level 59.1% 40.9% 100.0%

8 Count 19 15 34

% within Grade Level 55.9% 44.1% 100.0%

9 Count 27 12 39

% within Grade Level 69.2% 30.8% 100.0%

10 Count 20 16 36

% within Grade Level 55.6% 44.4% 100.0%

Total Count 92 61 153

% within Grade Level 60.1% 39.9% 100.0%

 109

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.937a 3 .586

Likelihood Ratio 1.976 3 .577
Linear-by-Linear Association .011 1 .918
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 13.56.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations
U9. a servo can
move 180
Grade Level degrees.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.061
Sig. (2-tailed) . .452
N 153 153
U9. a servo can move 180 Correlation Coefficient -.061 1.000
degrees. Sig. (2-tailed) .452 .
N 153 153
 110

Grade Level * U10. Solar panels are products of robotics.

Crosstab
U10. Solar panels are products of robotics. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say True Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue or False true true
Grade 7 Count 2 2 11 15 14 44
Level % within Grade Level 4.5% 4.5% 25.0% 34.1% 31.8% 100.0%
8 Count 0 2 5 12 15 34
% within Grade Level 0.0% 5.9% 14.7% 35.3% 44.1% 100.0%
9 Count 2 3 13 12 9 39
% within Grade Level 5.1% 7.7% 33.3% 30.8% 23.1% 100.0%
10 Count 0 5 9 10 12 36
% within Grade Level 0.0% 13.9% 25.0% 27.8% 33.3% 100.0%
Total Count 4 12 38 49 50 153
% within Grade Level 2.6% 7.8% 24.8% 32.0% 32.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 11.266a 12 .506
Likelihood Ratio 12.711 12 .390
Linear-by-Linear Association .713 1 .398
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .89.

Grade Level * U10. Solar panels are products of robotics (Readjusted)

Grade Level * U10. Solar panels are products of robotics. Crosstabulation

U10. Solar panels are products of

robotics.

Not positive Positive Total

Grade Level 7 Count 15 29 44

% within Grade Level 34.1% 65.9% 100.0%

8 Count 7 27 34

% within Grade Level 20.6% 79.4% 100.0%

9 Count 18 21 39

% within Grade Level 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%

10 Count 14 22 36

% within Grade Level 38.9% 61.1% 100.0%

Total Count 54 99 153

% within Grade Level 35.3% 64.7% 100.0%

 111

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.465a 3 .141

Likelihood Ratio 5.683 3 .128

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.190 1 .275

N of Valid Cases 153

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 12.00.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations
U10. Solar panels
are products of
Grade Level robotics.
Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.073
Sig. (2-tailed) . .371
N 153 153
U10. Solar panels are products Correlation Coefficient -.073 1.000
of robotics. Sig. (2-tailed) .371 .
N 153 153
 112

Crosstabs
Sex * Level of Perception towards Robotics
Crosstab

Level of Perception towards Robotics Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
0 3 9 35 25 72

% within Sex
0.0% 4.2% 12.5% 48.6% 34.7% 100.0%

Female Count
1 1 24 36 19 81

% within Sex
1.2% 1.2% 29.6% 44.4% 23.5% 100.0%
Total Count
1 4 33 71 44 153

% within Sex
0.7% 2.6% 21.6% 46.4% 28.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.153a 4 .057
Likelihood Ratio 9.813 4 .044
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.909 1 .048
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .47.

Sex * Level of Perception towards Robotics (Readjusted)

Crosstab
Level of Perception towards Robotics
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 12 60 72
% within Sex 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%
Female Count 26 55 81
% within Sex 32.1% 67.9% 100.0%
Total Count 38 115 153
% within Sex 24.8% 75.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.863a 1 .027
b
Continuity Correction 4.071 1 .044
 113

Likelihood Ratio 4.969 1 .026

Fisher's Exact Test .039 .021
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.831 1 .028
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.88.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * P1. I am not interested in robotics.

Crosstab

P1. I am not interested in robotics. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
31 27 7 6 1 72

% within Sex
43.1% 37.5% 9.7% 8.3% 1.4% 100.0%

Female Count
30 25 14 11 1 81

% within Sex
37.0% 30.9% 17.3% 13.6% 1.2% 100.0%
Total Count
61 52 21 17 2 153

% within Sex
39.9% 34.0% 13.7% 11.1% 1.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.380a 4 .496
Likelihood Ratio 3.435 4 .488
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.923 1 .166
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .94.

Sex * P1. I am not interested in robotics (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P1. I am not interested in robotics.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 65 7 72
% within Sex 90.3% 9.7% 100.0%
Female Count 69 12 81
% within Sex 85.2% 14.8% 100.0%
Total Count 134 19 153
% within Sex 87.6% 12.4% 100.0%
 114

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .909a 1 .340
b
Continuity Correction .501 1 .479
Likelihood Ratio .921 1 .337
Fisher's Exact Test .462 .241
Linear-by-Linear Association .903 1 .342
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * P2. I think I have skills for robotics.

Crosstab

P2. I think I have skills for robotics. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say True Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue or False true true
Sex Male Count
6 17 25 21 3 72

% within Sex
8.3% 23.6% 34.7% 29.2% 4.2% 100.0%

Female Count
9 28 24 18 2 81

% within Sex
11.1% 34.6% 29.6% 22.2% 2.5% 100.0%
Total Count
15 45 49 39 5 153

% within Sex
9.8% 29.4% 32.0% 25.5% 3.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.222a 4 .521
Likelihood Ratio 3.243 4 .518
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.618 1 .106
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 2.35.

Sex * P2. I think I have skills for robotics. (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P2. I think I have skills for robotics. Total
 115

Not positive Positive

Sex Male Count 48 24 72
% within Sex 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Female Count 61 20 81
% within Sex 75.3% 24.7% 100.0%
Total Count 109 44 153
% within Sex 71.2% 28.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.389a 1 .238
b
Continuity Correction 1.000 1 .317
Likelihood Ratio 1.389 1 .239
Fisher's Exact Test .284 .159
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.380 1 .240
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * P3. I think robotics can develop my creativity.

Crosstab

P3. I think robotics can develop my creativity. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
1 3 12 30 26 72

% within Sex
1.4% 4.2% 16.7% 41.7% 36.1% 100.0%

Female Count
1 7 15 36 22 81

% within Sex
1.2% 8.6% 18.5% 44.4% 27.2% 100.0%
Total Count
2 10 27 66 48 153

% within Sex
1.3% 6.5% 17.6% 43.1% 31.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.291a 4 .682
Likelihood Ratio 2.330 4 .675
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.623 1 .203
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .94.
 116

Sex * P3. I think robotics can develop my creativity(Readjusted)

Crosstab
P3. I think robotics can develop my
creativity.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 16 56 72
% within Sex 22.2% 77.8% 100.0%
Female Count 23 58 81
% within Sex 28.4% 71.6% 100.0%
Total Count 39 114 153
% within Sex 25.5% 74.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .765a 1 .382
b
Continuity Correction .474 1 .491
Likelihood Ratio .769 1 .381
Fisher's Exact Test .458 .246
Linear-by-Linear Association .760 1 .383
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18.35.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * P4. Robotics can help me have a bright future.

Crosstab

P4. Robotics can help me have a bright future. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say True Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue or False true true
Sex Male Count
0 11 12 30 19 72

% within Sex
0.0% 15.3% 16.7% 41.7% 26.4% 100.0%

Female Count
1 5 26 33 16 81

% within Sex
1.2% 6.2% 32.1% 40.7% 19.8% 100.0%
Total Count
1 16 38 63 35 153

% within Sex
0.7% 10.5% 24.8% 41.2% 22.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
 117

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.307a 4 .081
Likelihood Ratio 8.844 4 .065
Linear-by-Linear Association .243 1 .622
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .47.

Sex * P4. Robotics can help me have a bright future (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P4. Robotics can help me have a bright
future.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 23 49 72
% within Sex 31.9% 68.1% 100.0%
Female Count 32 49 81
% within Sex 39.5% 60.5% 100.0%
Total Count 55 98 153
% within Sex 35.9% 64.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .947a 1 .331
b
Continuity Correction .647 1 .421
Likelihood Ratio .950 1 .330
Fisher's Exact Test .399 .211
Linear-by-Linear Association .940 1 .332
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 25.88.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * P5. Robotics is a new adventure.

Crosstab

P5. Robotics is a new adventure. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
0 4 6 25 37 72

% within Sex
0.0% 5.6% 8.3% 34.7% 51.4% 100.0%

Female Count 1 6 10 24 40 81
 118

% within Sex
1.2% 7.4% 12.3% 29.6% 49.4% 100.0%
Total Count
1 10 16 49 77 153

% within Sex
0.7% 6.5% 10.5% 32.0% 50.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.015a 4 .733
Likelihood Ratio 2.407 4 .661
Linear-by-Linear Association .788 1 .375
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .47.

Sex * P5. Robotics is a new adventure (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P5. Robotics is a new adventure.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 10 62 72
% within Sex 13.9% 86.1% 100.0%
Female Count 17 64 81
% within Sex 21.0% 79.0% 100.0%
Total Count 27 126 153
% within Sex 17.6% 82.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.322a 1 .250
b
Continuity Correction .878 1 .349
Likelihood Ratio 1.338 1 .247
Fisher's Exact Test .292 .175
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.313 1 .252
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * P6. I think robotics will be fun.

Crosstab
P6. I think robotics will be fun. Total
 119

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely

untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
1 5 7 26 33 72

% within Sex
1.4% 6.9% 9.7% 36.1% 45.8% 100.0%

Female Count
2 9 15 25 30 81

% within Sex
2.5% 11.1% 18.5% 30.9% 37.0% 100.0%
Total Count
3 14 22 51 63 153

% within Sex
2.0% 9.2% 14.4% 33.3% 41.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.032a 4 .402
Likelihood Ratio 4.108 4 .392
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.936 1 .087
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1.41.

Sex * P6. I think robotics will be fun (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P6. I think robotics will be fun.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 13 59 72
% within Sex 18.1% 81.9% 100.0%
Female Count 26 55 81
% within Sex 32.1% 67.9% 100.0%
Total Count 39 114 153
% within Sex 25.5% 74.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.958a 1 .047
b
Continuity Correction 3.253 1 .071
Likelihood Ratio 4.028 1 .045
Fisher's Exact Test .063 .035
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.932 1 .047
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18.35.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 120

Sex * P7. Robotics will only give me headache.

Crosstab

P7. Robotics will only give me headache. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
19 24 15 11 3 72

% within Sex
26.4% 33.3% 20.8% 15.3% 4.2% 100.0%

Female Count
16 28 17 13 7 81

% within Sex
19.8% 34.6% 21.0% 16.0% 8.6% 100.0%
Total Count
35 52 32 24 10 153

% within Sex
22.9% 34.0% 20.9% 15.7% 6.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.934a 4 .748
Likelihood Ratio 1.973 4 .741
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.269 1 .260
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 4.71.

Sex * P7. Robotics will only give me headache (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P7. Robotics will only give me
headache.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 58 14 72
% within Sex 80.6% 19.4% 100.0%
Female Count 61 20 81
% within Sex 75.3% 24.7% 100.0%
Total Count 119 34 153
% within Sex 77.8% 22.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .607a 1 .436
 121

Continuity Correctionb .342 1 .559

Likelihood Ratio .610 1 .435
Fisher's Exact Test .559 .280
Linear-by-Linear Association .603 1 .437
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Sex * P8. I think robotics will not be worth spending for.

Crosstab
P8. I think robotics will not be worth spending for. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count 20 20 23 6 3 72
% within Sex 27.8% 27.8% 31.9% 8.3% 4.2% 100.0%
Female Count 24 29 11 12 5 81
% within Sex 29.6% 35.8% 13.6% 14.8% 6.2% 100.0%
Total Count 44 49 34 18 8 153
% within Sex 28.8% 32.0% 22.2% 11.8% 5.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.251a 4 .083
Likelihood Ratio 8.369 4 .079
Linear-by-Linear Association .004 1 .948
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3.76.

Sex * P8. I think robotics will not be worth spending for.

Crosstab
P8. I think robotics will not be worth
spending for.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 63 9 72
% within Sex 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
Female Count 64 17 81
% within Sex 79.0% 21.0% 100.0%
Total Count 127 26 153
% within Sex 83.0% 17.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.947a 1 .163
 122

Continuity Correctionb 1.392 1 .238

Likelihood Ratio 1.980 1 .159
Fisher's Exact Test .198 .119
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.934 1 .164
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.24.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Sex * P9. I think robotics will improve my learnings as a student.

Crosstab

P9. I think robotics will improve my learnings as a student. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
1 7 9 32 23 72

% within Sex
1.4% 9.7% 12.5% 44.4% 31.9% 100.0%

Female Count
5 4 9 32 31 81

% within Sex
6.2% 4.9% 11.1% 39.5% 38.3% 100.0%
Total Count
6 11 18 64 54 153

% within Sex
3.9% 7.2% 11.8% 41.8% 35.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.155a 4 .385
Likelihood Ratio 4.400 4 .355
Linear-by-Linear Association .029 1 .864
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 2.82.

Sex * P9. I think robotics will improve my learnings as a student (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P9. I think robotics will improve my
learnings as a student.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 17 55 72
% within Sex 23.6% 76.4% 100.0%
Female Count 18 63 81
% within Sex 22.2% 77.8% 100.0%
 123

Total Count 35 118 153

% within Sex 22.9% 77.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .042a 1 .838
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 .991
Likelihood Ratio .042 1 .838
Fisher's Exact Test .850 .495
Linear-by-Linear Association .041 1 .839
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.47.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sex * P10. Robotics will make me enjoy going to school.
Crosstab

P10. Robotics will make me enjoy going to school. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Sex Male Count
2 5 10 26 29 72

% within Sex
2.8% 6.9% 13.9% 36.1% 40.3% 100.0%

Female Count
3 13 16 31 18 81

% within Sex
3.7% 16.0% 19.8% 38.3% 22.2% 100.0%
Total Count
5 18 26 57 47 153

% within Sex
3.3% 11.8% 17.0% 37.3% 30.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.650a 4 .105
Likelihood Ratio 7.789 4 .100
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.346 1 .012
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 2.35.

Sex * P10. Robotics will make me enjoy going to school (Readjusted)

Crosstab
 124

P10. Robotics will make me enjoy

going to school.
Not positive Positive Total
Sex Male Count 17 55 72
% within Sex 23.6% 76.4% 100.0%
Female Count 32 49 81
% within Sex 39.5% 60.5% 100.0%
Total Count 49 104 153
% within Sex 32.0% 68.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.424a 1 .035
b
Continuity Correction 3.724 1 .054
Likelihood Ratio 4.483 1 .034
Fisher's Exact Test .039 .026
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.395 1 .036
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.06.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Grade Level * Level of Perception towards Robotics

Crosstab

Level of Perception towards Robotics Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 0 1 8 21 14 44

% within Grade Level

0.0% 2.3% 18.2% 47.7% 31.8% 100.0%

8 Count
1 1 9 15 8 34

% within Grade Level

2.9% 2.9% 26.5% 44.1% 23.5% 100.0%

9 Count
0 0 10 18 11 39

% within Grade Level

0.0% 0.0% 25.6% 46.2% 28.2% 100.0%

10 Count
0 2 6 17 11 36

% within Grade Level

0.0% 5.6% 16.7% 47.2% 30.6% 100.0%
Total Count
1 4 33 71 44 153

% within Grade Level

0.7% 2.6% 21.6% 46.4% 28.8% 100.0%
 125

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.630a 12 .813
Likelihood Ratio 7.885 12 .794
Linear-by-Linear Association .008 1 .931
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .22.

Grade Level * Level of Perception towards Robotics (Readjusted)

Crosstab
Level of Perception towards Robotics
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 9 35 44
% within Grade Level 20.5% 79.5% 100.0%
8 Count 11 23 34
% within Grade Level 32.4% 67.6% 100.0%
9 Count 10 29 39
% within Grade Level 25.6% 74.4% 100.0%
10 Count 8 28 36
% within Grade Level 22.2% 77.8% 100.0%
Total Count 38 115 153
% within Grade Level 24.8% 75.2% 100.0%
 126

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.627a 3 .653
Likelihood Ratio 1.591 3 .661
Linear-by-Linear Association .003 1 .953
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 8.44.

Correlations

Perception
towards
Grade Level Robotics Score

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .010

Sig. (2-tailed) . .905

N 153 153

Perception towards Robotics Correlation Coefficient .010 1.000

Score Sig. (2-tailed) .905 .

N 153 153
 127

Grade Level * P1. I am not interested in robotics.

Crosstab
P1. I am not interested in robotics. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 24 11 2 7 0 44
Level % within Grade Level 54.5% 25.0% 4.5% 15.9% 0.0% 100.0%
8 Count 11 13 3 6 1 34
% within Grade Level 32.4% 38.2% 8.8% 17.6% 2.9% 100.0%
9 Count 14 15 8 2 0 39
% within Grade Level 35.9% 38.5% 20.5% 5.1% 0.0% 100.0%
10 Count 12 13 8 2 1 36
% within Grade Level 33.3% 36.1% 22.2% 5.6% 2.8% 100.0%
Total Count 61 52 21 17 2 153
% within Grade Level 39.9% 34.0% 13.7% 11.1% 1.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 18.252a 12 .108
Likelihood Ratio 19.714 12 .073
Linear-by-Linear Association .659 1 .417
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 10 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .44.

Grade Level * P1. I am not interested in robotics (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P1. I am not interested in robotics.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 37 7 44
% within Grade Level 84.1% 15.9% 100.0%
8 Count 27 7 34
% within Grade Level 79.4% 20.6% 100.0%
9 Count 37 2 39
% within Grade Level 94.9% 5.1% 100.0%
10 Count 33 3 36
% within Grade Level 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%
Total Count 134 19 153
% within Grade Level 87.6% 12.4% 100.0%
 128

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.038a 3 .169
Likelihood Ratio 5.242 3 .155
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.476 1 .116
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 3 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 4.22.

Correlations

P1. I am not
interested in
Grade Level robotics.

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .110

Sig. (2-tailed) . .175

N 153 153

P1. I am not interested in Correlation Coefficient .110 1.000

robotics. Sig. (2-tailed) .175 .

N 153 153
 129

Grade Level * P2. I think I have skills for robotics.

Crosstab
P2. I think I have skills for robotics. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 6 7 23 8 0 44
Level % within Grade Level 13.6% 15.9% 52.3% 18.2% 0.0% 100.0%
8 Count 6 10 8 8 2 34
% within Grade Level 17.6% 29.4% 23.5% 23.5% 5.9% 100.0%
9 Count 3 16 11 9 0 39
% within Grade Level 7.7% 41.0% 28.2% 23.1% 0.0% 100.0%
10 Count 0 12 7 14 3 36
% within Grade Level 0.0% 33.3% 19.4% 38.9% 8.3% 100.0%
Total Count 15 45 49 39 5 153
% within Grade Level 9.8% 29.4% 32.0% 25.5% 3.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 29.407a 12 .003
Likelihood Ratio 33.749 12 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.105 1 .078
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1.11.

Grade Level * P2. I think I have skills for robotics (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P2. I think I have skills for robotics.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 36 8 44
% within Grade Level 81.8% 18.2% 100.0%
8 Count 24 10 34
% within Grade Level 70.6% 29.4% 100.0%
9 Count 30 9 39
% within Grade Level 76.9% 23.1% 100.0%
10 Count 19 17 36
% within Grade Level 52.8% 47.2% 100.0%
Total Count 109 44 153
% within Grade Level 71.2% 28.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.014a 3 .029
Likelihood Ratio 8.742 3 .033
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.072 1 .014
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 9.78.
 130

Grade Level * P3. I think robotics can develop my creativity.

Crosstab

P3. I think robotics can develop my creativity. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 1 3 6 20 14 44

% within Grade Level

2.3% 6.8% 13.6% 45.5% 31.8% 100.0%

8 Count
0 2 10 12 10 34

% within Grade Level

0.0% 5.9% 29.4% 35.3% 29.4% 100.0%

9 Count
0 3 8 14 14 39

% within Grade Level

0.0% 7.7% 20.5% 35.9% 35.9% 100.0%

10 Count
1 2 3 20 10 36

% within Grade Level

2.8% 5.6% 8.3% 55.6% 27.8% 100.0%
Total Count
2 10 27 66 48 153

% within Grade Level

1.3% 6.5% 17.6% 43.1% 31.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.791a 12 .634
Likelihood Ratio 10.497 12 .572
Linear-by-Linear Association .059 1 .808
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .44.

Grade Level * P3. I think robotics can develop my creativity (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P3. I think robotics can develop my
creativity.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 10 34 44
% within Grade Level 22.7% 77.3% 100.0%
 131

8 Count 12 22 34
% within Grade Level 35.3% 64.7% 100.0%
9 Count 11 28 39
% within Grade Level 28.2% 71.8% 100.0%
10 Count 6 30 36
% within Grade Level 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%
Total Count 39 114 153
% within Grade Level 25.5% 74.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.525a 3 .318
Likelihood Ratio 3.549 3 .315
Linear-by-Linear Association .440 1 .507
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 8.67.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

P3. I think robotics

can develop my
Grade Level creativity.

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .018

Sig. (2-tailed) . .825

N 153 153

P3. I think robotics can develop Correlation Coefficient .018 1.000

my creativity. Sig. (2-tailed) .825 .

N 153 153
 132

Grade Level * P4. Robotics can help me have a bright future.

Crosstab
P4. Robotics can help me have a bright future. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 0 3 12 18 11 44
Level % within Grade Level 0.0% 6.8% 27.3% 40.9% 25.0% 100.0%
8 Count 0 6 9 11 8 34
% within Grade Level 0.0% 17.6% 26.5% 32.4% 23.5% 100.0%
9 Count 0 3 11 18 7 39
% within Grade Level 0.0% 7.7% 28.2% 46.2% 17.9% 100.0%
10 Count 1 4 6 16 9 36
% within Grade Level 2.8% 11.1% 16.7% 44.4% 25.0% 100.0%
Total Count 1 16 38 63 35 153
% within Grade Level 0.7% 10.5% 24.8% 41.2% 22.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.625a 12 .735
Likelihood Ratio 8.271 12 .764
Linear-by-Linear Association .031 1 .859
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .22.

Grade Level * P4. Robotics can help me have a bright future (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P4. Robotics can help me have a bright
future.
Not positive Positive Total
 133

Grade Level 7 Count 15 29 44

% within Grade Level 34.1% 65.9% 100.0%
8 Count 15 19 34
% within Grade Level 44.1% 55.9% 100.0%
9 Count 14 25 39
% within Grade Level 35.9% 64.1% 100.0%
10 Count 11 25 36
% within Grade Level 30.6% 69.4% 100.0%
Total Count 55 98 153
% within Grade Level 35.9% 64.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.506a 3 .681
Likelihood Ratio 1.491 3 .684
Linear-by-Linear Association .208 1 .649
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 12.22.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

P4. Robotics can

Grade help me have a
Level bright future.

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .000

Sig. (2-tailed) . .998

N 153 153

P4. Robotics can help me have Correlation Coefficient .000 1.000

a bright future. Sig. (2-tailed) .998 .

N 153 153
 134

Grade Level * P5. Robotics is a new adventure.

Crosstab
P5. Robotics is a new adventure. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 1 2 6 18 17 44
Level % within Grade Level 2.3% 4.5% 13.6% 40.9% 38.6% 100.0%
8 Count 0 2 3 10 19 34
% within Grade Level 0.0% 5.9% 8.8% 29.4% 55.9% 100.0%
9 Count 0 3 4 13 19 39
% within Grade Level 0.0% 7.7% 10.3% 33.3% 48.7% 100.0%
10 Count 0 3 3 8 22 36
% within Grade Level 0.0% 8.3% 8.3% 22.2% 61.1% 100.0%
Total Count 1 10 16 49 77 153
% within Grade Level 0.7% 6.5% 10.5% 32.0% 50.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.206a 12 .769
Likelihood Ratio 8.303 12 .761
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.196 1 .274
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .22.

Grade Level * P5. Robotics is a new adventure (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P5. Robotics is a new adventure.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 9 35 44
% within Grade Level 20.5% 79.5% 100.0%
8 Count 5 29 34
% within Grade Level 14.7% 85.3% 100.0%
 135

9 Count 7 32 39
% within Grade Level 17.9% 82.1% 100.0%
10 Count 6 30 36
% within Grade Level 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%
Total Count 27 126 153
% within Grade Level 17.6% 82.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .467a 3 .926
Likelihood Ratio .468 3 .926
Linear-by-Linear Association .115 1 .735
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 6.00.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

P5. Robotics is a
Grade Level new adventure.

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .118

Sig. (2-tailed) . .145

N 153 153

P5. Robotics is a new Correlation Coefficient .118 1.000

adventure. Sig. (2-tailed) .145 .

N 153 153
 136

Grade Level * P6. I think robotics will be fun.

Crosstab
P6. I think robotics will be fun. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 0 5 7 11 21 44
Level % within Grade Level 0.0% 11.4% 15.9% 25.0% 47.7% 100.0%
8 Count 2 2 5 14 11 34
% within Grade Level 5.9% 5.9% 14.7% 41.2% 32.4% 100.0%
9 Count 0 2 6 15 16 39
% within Grade Level 0.0% 5.1% 15.4% 38.5% 41.0% 100.0%
10 Count 1 5 4 11 15 36
% within Grade Level 2.8% 13.9% 11.1% 30.6% 41.7% 100.0%
Total Count 3 14 22 51 63 153
% within Grade Level 2.0% 9.2% 14.4% 33.3% 41.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.030a 12 .613
Likelihood Ratio 10.835 12 .543
Linear-by-Linear Association .064 1 .800
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 9 cells (45.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .67.

Grade Level * P6. I think robotics will be fun (Readjusted)

Crosstab
P6. I think robotics will be fun.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 12 32 44
% within Grade Level 27.3% 72.7% 100.0%
 137

8 Count 9 25 34
% within Grade Level 26.5% 73.5% 100.0%
9 Count 8 31 39
% within Grade Level 20.5% 79.5% 100.0%
10 Count 10 26 36
% within Grade Level 27.8% 72.2% 100.0%
Total Count 39 114 153
% within Grade Level 25.5% 74.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .699a 3 .874
Likelihood Ratio .720 3 .868
Linear-by-Linear Association .031 1 .861
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 8.67.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

P6. I think robotics

Grade Level will be fun.

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.021

Sig. (2-tailed) . .801

N 153 153

P6. I think robotics Correlation Coefficient -.021 1.000

will be fun. Sig. (2-tailed) .801 .

N 153 153
 138

Grade Level * P7. Robotics will only give me headache.

Crosstab

P7. Robotics will only give me headache. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count
15 12 12 3 2 44
Level
% within Grade Level
34.1% 27.3% 27.3% 6.8% 4.5% 100.0%

8 Count
8 10 7 3 6 34

% within Grade Level

23.5% 29.4% 20.6% 8.8% 17.6% 100.0%

9 Count
7 16 9 7 0 39

% within Grade Level

17.9% 41.0% 23.1% 17.9% 0.0% 100.0%

10 Count
5 14 4 11 2 36

% within Grade Level

13.9% 38.9% 11.1% 30.6% 5.6% 100.0%

Total Count
35 52 32 24 10 153

% within Grade Level

22.9% 34.0% 20.9% 15.7% 6.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 26.039 12 .011
Likelihood Ratio 26.435 12 .009
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.819 1 .093
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 4 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 2.22.
 139

Grade Level * P7. Robotics will only give me headache (Readjusted)

Grade Level * P7. Robotics will only give me headache. Crosstabulation
P7. Robotics will only give me
headache.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 39 5 44
% within Grade Level 88.6% 11.4% 100.0%
8 Count 25 9 34
% within Grade Level 73.5% 26.5% 100.0%
9 Count 32 7 39
% within Grade Level 82.1% 17.9% 100.0%
10 Count 23 13 36
% within Grade Level 63.9% 36.1% 100.0%
Total Count 119 34 153
% within Grade Level 77.8% 22.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 7.787 3 .051
Likelihood Ratio 7.835 3 .050
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.999 1 .025
N of Valid Cases 153

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 7.56.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

P7. Robotics will

only give me
headache. Grade Level

Spearman's rho P7. Robotics will only give me Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .146
headache. Sig. (2-tailed) . .071

N 153 153
 140

Grade Level Correlation Coefficient .146 1.000

Sig. (2-tailed) .071 .

N 153 153

Grade Level * P8. I think robotics will not be worth spending for.

Crosstab
P8. I think robotics will not be worth spending for. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 16 7 16 2 3 44
Level % within Grade Level 36.4% 15.9% 36.4% 4.5% 6.8% 100.0%
8 Count 5 15 7 4 3 34
% within Grade Level 14.7% 44.1% 20.6% 11.8% 8.8% 100.0%
9 Count 14 14 7 4 0 39
% within Grade Level 35.9% 35.9% 17.9% 10.3% 0.0% 100.0%
10 Count 9 13 4 8 2 36
% within Grade Level 25.0% 36.1% 11.1% 22.2% 5.6% 100.0%
Total Count 44 49 34 18 8 153
% within Grade Level 28.8% 32.0% 22.2% 11.8% 5.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 24.370a 12 .018
Likelihood Ratio 27.024 12 .008
Linear-by-Linear Association .000 1 .995
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 7 cells (35.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1.78.

Grade Level * P8. I think robotics will not be worth spending for (Readjusted)
 141

Grade Level * P8. I think robotics will not be worth spending for. Crosstabulation
P8. I think robotics will not be worth
spending for.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 39 5 44
% within Grade Level 88.6% 11.4% 100.0%
8 Count 27 7 34
% within Grade Level 79.4% 20.6% 100.0%
9 Count 35 4 39
% within Grade Level 89.7% 10.3% 100.0%
10 Count 26 10 36
% within Grade Level 72.2% 27.8% 100.0%
Total Count 127 26 153
% within Grade Level 83.0% 17.0% 100.0%
 142

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.523a 3 .137
Likelihood Ratio 5.405 3 .144
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.066 1 .151
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 5.78.

Correlations

P8. I think
robotics will not
be worth
Grade Level spending for.

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.002

Sig. (2-tailed) . .977

N 153 153

P8. I think robotics will not be Correlation Coefficient -.002 1.000

worth spending for. Sig. (2-tailed) .977 .

N 153 153
 143

Grade Level * P9. I think robotics will improve my learnings as a student.

Crosstab
P9. I think robotics will improve my learnings as a student. Total
Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count 2 3 4 18 17 44
Level % within Grade Level 4.5% 6.8% 9.1% 40.9% 38.6% 100.0%
8 Count 1 7 6 10 10 34
% within Grade Level 2.9% 20.6% 17.6% 29.4% 29.4% 100.0%
9 Count 2 1 4 19 13 39
% within Grade Level 5.1% 2.6% 10.3% 48.7% 33.3% 100.0%
10 Count 1 0 4 17 14 36
% within Grade Level 2.8% 0.0% 11.1% 47.2% 38.9% 100.0%
Total Count 6 11 18 64 54 153
% within Grade Level 3.9% 7.2% 11.8% 41.8% 35.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 16.597a 12 .165
Likelihood Ratio 16.724 12 .160
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.123 1 .289
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 11 cells (55.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
1.33.

Grade Level * P9. I think robotics will improve my learnings as a student.

Crosstab
P9. I think robotics will improve my
learnings as a student.
Not positive Positive Total
Grade Level 7 Count 9 35 44
% within Grade Level 20.5% 79.5% 100.0%
8 Count 14 20 34
% within Grade Level 41.2% 58.8% 100.0%
9 Count 7 32 39
% within Grade Level 17.9% 82.1% 100.0%
10 Count 5 31 36
% within Grade Level 13.9% 86.1% 100.0%
Total Count 35 118 153
% within Grade Level 22.9% 77.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.785a 3 .032
Likelihood Ratio 8.184 3 .042
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.529 1 .216
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.78.
 144

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

P9. I think robotics

will improve my
learnings as a
Grade Level student.

Spearman's rho Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .058

Sig. (2-tailed) . .474

N 153 153

P9. I think robotics will improve Correlation Coefficient .058 1.000

my learnings as a student. Sig. (2-tailed) .474 .

N 153 153
 145

Grade Level * P10. Robotics will make me enjoy going to school.

Crosstab

P10. Robotics will make me enjoy going to school. Total

Absolutely Somewhat Cannot Say Somewhat Absolutely
untrue untrue True or False true true
Grade 7 Count
Level 1 5 8 14 16 44

% within Grade Level

2.3% 11.4% 18.2% 31.8% 36.4% 100.0%

8 Count
3 4 5 13 9 34

% within Grade Level

8.8% 11.8% 14.7% 38.2% 26.5% 100.0%

9 Count
1 2 8 17 11 39

% within Grade Level

2.6% 5.1% 20.5% 43.6% 28.2% 100.0%

10 Count
0 7 5 13 11 36

% within Grade Level

0.0% 19.4% 13.9% 36.1% 30.6% 100.0%
Total Count
5 18 26 57 47 153

% within Grade Level

3.3% 11.8% 17.0% 37.3% 30.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.008a 12 .615
Likelihood Ratio 10.254 12 .594
Linear-by-Linear Association .014 1 .904
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 7 cells (35.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1.11.

Grade Level * P10. Robotics will make me enjoy going to school.

Crosstab
P10. Robotics will make me enjoy Total
going to school.
 146

Not positive Positive

Grade Level 7 Count 14 30 44
% within Grade Level 31.8% 68.2% 100.0%
8 Count 12 22 34
% within Grade Level 35.3% 64.7% 100.0%
9 Count 11 28 39
% within Grade Level 28.2% 71.8% 100.0%
10 Count 12 24 36
% within Grade Level 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Total Count 49 104 153
% within Grade Level 32.0% 68.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .457a 3 .928
Likelihood Ratio .460 3 .927
Linear-by-Linear Association .005 1 .945
N of Valid Cases 153
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 10.89.

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

P10. Robotics will

Grade make me enjoy
Level going to school.

Spearman's Grade Level Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.023

rho
Sig. (2-tailed) . .777

N 153 153

P10. Robotics will make me Correlation Coefficient -.023 1.000

enjoy going to school.
Sig. (2-tailed) .777 .

N 153 153
 147

Appendix 3. Communication Letters

COLLEGE OF ST. JOHN-ROXAS

Gov. Atila Balgos Ave., Banica, Roxas City
5800 Capiz, Philippines

______________________________________________________________________________
February 22, 2018

ANGELINE MARCELINO
BEU Principal

Dear Miss:

Warm Lasallian Greetings!

As one of the requirements for the Partial Fulfillment to the Subject Research, we, the grade 12-
STEM students have decided to conduct a correlational quantitative study entitled, Level of
Understanding and Perception of Junior High School Students Towards Robotics.

In connection with this, we would like to ask permission from your good office to allow us to
leave the school at 10:00 in the morning to go to Capiz National High School to send
communication letters.

Favorable action on this request will be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Yours in St. John,

CHRISTIAN CZAR BARTOCILLO

BABY GEAN BAQUILAR
ALIC DENIEL DELA CRUZ
 148

REMBRANDT JAMES DUMANGAS

KRISTINE SAULER
Research Teacher

ANGELINE MARCELINO
BEU Principal

COLLEGE OF ST. JOHN-ROXAS

Gov. Atila Balgos Ave., Banica, Roxas City
5800 Capiz, Philippines

______________________________________________________________________________
February 22, 2018

ANGELINE MARCELINO
BEU Principal

Dear Miss:

Warm Lasallian Greetings!

As one of the requirements for the Partial Fulfillment to the Subject Research, we, the grade 12-
STEM students have decided to conduct a correlational quantitative study entitled, Level of
Understanding and Perception of Junior High School Students Towards Robotics.

In connection with this, we would like to ask permission from your good office to allow us to
conduct the study to the Grade 7 to 10 of the College of St. John-Roxas.

Favorable action on this request will be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Yours in St. John,

CHRISTIAN CZAR BARTOCILLO

BABY GEAN BAQUILAR
ALIC DENIEL DELA CRUZ
REMBRANDT JAMES DUMANGAS
 149

KRISTINE SAULER
Research Teacher

ANGELINE MARCELINO
BEU Principal