FR_Mock_Solution
FR_Mock_Solution
Financial Reporting
Given that the chances of employee’s victory are less than probable, the issue should be disclosed
in notes. The 2nd issue results in a constructive obligation for Strength Co. Therefore, a provision
is required.
2. D
To be capitalised, all development costs must meet certain conditions listed by IAS 38. The first
project fails the condition of commercial viability. Although Technology Co can use the findings
in other projects, this specific project cannot be capitalised. Project 2 cannot be capitalised as the
business lacks sufficient financial resources to complete the project.
3. C
The cost of the fixed asset and any costs incurred to bring the asset to location and workable
condition are included in the initial carrying amount. Training provided to the employees cannot
be capitalised as the business cannot control the knowledge of employees. Maintenance cost will
be expensed out each year.
4. C
Bearer plants and land related to agricultural activity are both excluded from the scope of IAS
41. Unlike biological assets, agricultural produce must always be measured at fair value.
5. B
Disclosures related to IAS 37 have been added to F7 syllabus from 2016. Disclosures for prior year
reconciliations are not required under IAS 37.
6. A
Dividends are considered to be received when they are declared. The actual receipt of the cheque
is irrelevant.
7. A
8. D
The goodwill of $100,000 should be written off in full. The remaining loss, after the allocation to
goodwill, will be $150,000.
Inventory cannot be written off further as it is already valued at net realisable value. Therefore,
the combined value of equipment and furniture after the impairment will be: $400,000 +
$200,000 - $150,000 = $450,000
9. C
Under IFRS 10, entities meeting the definition of 'investment entity' are granted special
exemption from consolidation.
10. B
11. A
Inventories, deferred tax assets, non-current assets held for sale and financial assets are all
excluded from the scope of IAS 36. Their valuation is dealt with by the respective accounting
standard.
12. D
Profit before interest and tax $70,000
Depreciation ($100,000 x 20%) $20,000
Increase in account receivable ($5,000)
Foreign exchange loss $5,000
Decrease in inventory $4,000
Increase in payable $3,000
Cash generated from operations $97,000
13. C
Cost of sales – P Co $90,000
Cost of sales – S Co ($60,000 / 12 x 9) $45,000
14. A
Lease is defined as “A contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset,
referred to as the underlying asset, for a period of time in exchange for a consideration.”
15. D
Capitalising the repair expense will result in overstated profits. Overstated profits will overstate
EPS and ROCE.
Section B
16. C
Note: Remaining useful life of 7.5 years can be calculated by utilising the information for
accumulated depreciation.
17. B
Grant 1 - Grants related to taxable income are excluded from the scope of IAS 20.
18. A
The evidence of the claim existed before the reporting date. It was simply not received by White
Co. Therefore, Issue 1 needs to be adjusted. No evidence of Issue 2 existed at the reporting date.
It needs not to be adjusted.
19. A
The assets are impaired only when their carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell.
Crane 1
Impairment = Nil
Crane 2
Impairment = $10,000
Crane 3
Impairment = $340,000
Total impairment
20. D
22. A
Cash generated from operations $615,000
Interest paid ($30,000)
Dividends paid ($55,000)
Tax paid (50 + 160 - 80) (130,000)
Net cash from operating activities $400,000
23. C
Working 1
Therefore, entire loss on disposal relates to price actually paid for dismantling of NCA
24. D
25. A
This can simply be calculated by subtracting open cash balance from closing cash balance:
26. D
Only public limited companies, or those in the process of issuing securities to public, are required
to present EPS. There is no need to calculate EPS separately for each company in the consolidated
accounts.
27. B
Redeemable preference shares are treated as debt. Therefore, the dividend paid on such shares
is already deducted when arriving at net profit.
EPS = $38.00
28. A
EPS = $2.73
29. A
30. C
Theoretical ex-rights price is simply a fraction used in the calculation of EPS. No separate
disclosure is required for it.
Section C
31. Hydrogen
$’000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (19,000 + 11,400) 30,400
Goodwill (W3) 6,400
Investment in associate (W6) 6,750
Investment – Fair value through profit or loss 8,000
Current assets
Inventory (8,500 + 5,500 – 500 PURP) (W7) 13,500
Trade receivables (3,500 + 800) 4,300
Cash and bank (1,000 + 500) 1,500
Total assets 70,850
W1 – Group structure
Sulphur = 3,000,000 / 4,000,000 = 75% holding
Argon = 25% holding
W2 – Net assets of Sulphur
Acquisition ($’000) Reporting date ($’000) Post acquisition ($’000)
Share capital 4,000 4,000 0
Retained earnings 7,000 9,000 2,000
Fair value adjustment (400) 0 400
PURP on inventory (W7) (500) (500)
10,600 12,500 1,900
W3 – Goodwill
Cost of investment of Hydrogen
Cash (3,000 x $1.25) $3,750
Shares (3,000 / 2 x $6.5) $9,750
$13,500
NCI at acquisition $3,500
$17,000
Less: Fair value of net assets (W2) (10,600)
Goodwill $6,400
W4 – Non-controlling interest
NCI value at acquisition $3,500
Share of post-acquisition profits (1,900 x 25%) $475
Value of non-controlling interest $3,975
W5 – Consolidated Reserves
Hydrogen (15,000 + 8,000) $23,000
Professional cost of acquisition ($500)
Increase in fair value of investment (8,000 – 5,000) $3,000
Share of Sulphur (1,900 x 75%) $1,425
Share of Argon (W6) $1,000
Consolidated reserves $27,925
W6 – Investment in Associate
Cost of investment (4,000 x 25% x 5.75) $5,750
Share of profit (4,000 x 25%) $1,000
Value of Argon $6,750
W7 – Provision for unrealised profit on inventory
Amount of profit = $3,000,000 / 150 x 50 = 1,000
5% unsold = 1,000 x 50% = 500
32. Delta Part
(a)
Operating profit /
ROCE 10.26% 14.03%
(Total assets - Current liabilities)
Receivables days Trade receivables / Revenue x 365 236.93 days 66.36 days
Payables days Trade payables / Cost of sales x 365 115.94 days 36.05 days
The performance of Delta can be assessed with the help of calculated ratios. Although the
revenue and the gross profit of the business have improved, there are many other alarming areas.
They are explained here in the light of each individual ratio.
Gross profit margin of Delta has improved from 33.06% in 2016 to 40.35% in 2017. The growth of
revenue has outperformed the growth of cost of sales. It indicates the efficiency of sales
departments in accelerating revenues as well as the efficiency of production and procurement
department in controlling the direct costs.
Net profit margin of Delta has deteriorated from 10.74% in 2016 to 2.11% in 2017. The major
cause for this decline is the unusual increase in administration expense and finance costs. Net
profit margin, also known as the bottom line figure, is extremely important from investor’s
perspective. Unless these costs are controlled in the future, Delta may struggle to keep its
investors satisfied.
Return on capital employed (ROCE) has fallen from 14.03% in 2016 to 10.26% in 2017. ROCE is
yet another important ratio from the perspective of investors. Although operating profit, the
numerator of the ratio, has slightly improved, Delta has used greater amount of finance to
generate it.
Gearing
Incorporation of debt in the capital structure increases the risk profile of a business. Gearing has
increased from 14.29% to 33.58%. This is principally because of the loan that Delta has acquired
during the year. Although no industry benchmarks about the acceptable level of gearing are
provided, Delta needs to be cautious with the inclusion of debt in its capital
structure.
Interest cover
The interest cover ratio has declined from 3.6 times to 1.38 times. Interest cover ratio illustrates
the ability of a business to repay interest as it falls due. Failing to make the interest payments on
time may result in liquidation from Delta. Unless, the ratio is improved, Delta needs to monitor it
closely.
Current ratio
The current ratio of Delta has also declined from 8.81: 1 to 6.11: 1. This ratio depends entirely on
the nature of the industry. The ratio varies significantly from one industry to another. In the
absence of any information about the industry, the appropriateness of these results cannot be
assessed. However, the ratio appears not to be a major cause of concern for Delta.
Quick ratio
Quick ratio has also declined from 4.94: 1 to 3.52: 1. This ratio, once again, depends on the nature
of the industry. Nevertheless, there is no major cause of concern as Delta can easily repay its
current liabilities from its liquid assets.
Receivables days
The most dramatic change from 2016 to 2017 is evident from receivable days. The average period
of collection from the customers has increased from 66 days to 237 days. It indicates the inability
of Delta to recover the cash from its customers. Perhaps, it is also the root cause for deteriorating
liquidity condition. The lack of recovery has forced Delta into cash crisis which, in turn, has forced
Delta to take loan, thereby leading to higher finance costs, lower net profits and low interest
cover ratio.
Payables days
Payable period have also increased from 36 days to 116 days. This is a serious cause of concern
has holding the suppliers’ payments may force them to stop supplying. Delta needs to, somehow,
make timely payments to suppliers in order to safeguard the business relations.
Earnings per share have reduced from 0.26 cents to 0.06 cents. This is again alarming and is simply
because of the poor net profitability of the business.
Conclusion
The performance of Delta has significantly deteriorated in 2017. Almost every ratio was healthy
in 2016 and alarming in 2017. The most problematic area is working capital management as it
appears to be the root cause behind all other business problems.
Marking scheme: