Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211

Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

Green Accounting: A Fundamental Pillar of Corporate

Sustainability Reporting

Ahmed Abubakar Zik-Rullahi, Ph.D

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Sciences,
University of Abuja, P.M.B 117, Gwagwalada- Abuja
Email: zikrullahi.ahmed@uniabuja.edu.ng

Ibikunle Jide
Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Management Sciences,
Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT), Enugu State, Nigeria.
Email: ibikunlejide09@gmail.com

DOI: 10.56201/jafm.v9.no8.2023.pg59.72

Abstract
In the evolving landscape of corporate sustainability, green accounting emerges as a pivotal
framework that underpins effective and comprehensive sustainability reporting. This study
encapsulates an exploration into the significance, challenges, and benefits of green accounting
as a fundamental pillar of corporate sustainability reporting. The Objective of the study was
to delved into the essence of green accounting within the context of corporate sustainability
reporting, unravelling its role in quantifying and communicating the environmental impact of
business operations. The study adopted exploratory research design, by employed a secondary
data approach, specifically employing content analysis, to address the paucity of empirical
research on the application of environmental accounting and reporting. The findings revealed
the moderate integration of green accounting and sustainability reporting was observed across
diverse industries. Reporting frameworks such as GRI and TCFD were commonly adopted,
indicating a push for standardized reporting. Diverse Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were
utilized, reflecting the multifaceted nature of sustainability. Stakeholder engagement emerged
as a critical factor in ensuring accurate and relevant reporting. Recommendations there should
be more emphasis on data integrity, a robust stakeholder engagement, customization of
frameworks, valuation solutions to develop reliable methods for valuing environmental assets
and liabilities, technological adoption, advocacy for regulation, collaborative approach: foster
collaboration among industries, academia, NGOs, and Governments to share best practices
and accelerate progress. Future research Investor Decision-making, investigate how the
quality and comprehensiveness of sustainability reporting influence investor decisions and
perceptions. Impact Assessment. Examine the tangible impact of sustainability reporting on
driving eco-friendly business practices and reducing environmental footprints. Regulatory
Dynamics, explore the role of evolving regulations in shaping the adoption of green accounting
and sustainability reporting practices. Technological Innovations Investigate the integration
of advanced technologies, such as blockchain and AI, in enhancing data accuracy and
transparency in reporting.
Keywords: Green Accounting, Corporate Sustainability Reporting
1. Introduction

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 59

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

Green accounting and corporate sustainability reporting are essential components of modern
business practices aimed at addressing environmental concerns and promoting sustainable
development. Green accounting and corporate sustainability reporting have emerged as critical
concerns worldwide, affecting both developed and developing nations. This heightened focus
stems from the increasingly detrimental effects of climate change on the business operating
landscape in recent years. Companies globally are facing the urgent need to account for their
environmental impact and communicate their sustainability efforts transparently. The
escalating impacts of climate change, including extreme weather events, resource scarcity, and
shifting consumer preferences, are posing significant challenges to businesses' traditional
practices. This imperative is not limited to advanced economies; developing nations are also
grappling with the consequences of climate change on their economies and societies. As the
effects of environmental degradation become more pronounced, businesses in these countries
are recognizing the importance of adopting sustainable practices to ensure their long-term
viability and resilience.
In response to this changing landscape, regulatory bodies, investors, and consumers are
increasingly demanding greater transparency and accountability from companies. Sustainable
practices are no longer mere optional strategies; they have evolved into essential elements for
maintaining business competitiveness, securing investments, and upholding brand reputation.
Corporate businesses are entities that create goods or services by combining various production
factors to fulfill people's needs and demands. As they carry out their operations, these
businesses frequently utilize natural resources. Unfortunately, this consumption of resources
can sometimes lead to environmental challenges. During both their operational activities and
the use of their products, these businesses can generate various forms of waste, including solid,
liquid, and gaseous materials. Consequently, environmental elements such as air, soil, and
water may become contaminated ( Şimşek and Öztürk in 2021). However, it's important to
recognize that the extent and impact of these effects can vary across different industries and
businesses. Many modern companies are taking steps to mitigate these impacts through
sustainable practices, technological advancements, and environmental regulations.
Green accounting, also known as environmental accounting, is a specialized form of
accounting that aims to incorporate environmental costs and benefits into traditional accounting
practices. The objective is to enhance financial reporting accuracy and provide a more
comprehensive assessment of a nation's overall well-being. In essence, green accounting seeks
to bridge the gap between economic activities and their environmental impact. Environmental
accounting, often referred to as green accounting, involves the inclusion of environment-related
information within a firm's financial statements. This practice serves as a means of
transparently conveying the measures taken by the company to conserve and protect the
environment. Such information is communicated to various stakeholders, including
government entities, financial institutions, host community, and others who have a vested
interest in the company's operations. The essence of green accounting lies in its ability to reveal
the environmental efforts of a business and how those efforts translate into financial
implications. By integrating environment-related information into financial statements,
companies can showcase their commitment to environmental responsibility, and stakeholders
can gain insight into the steps being taken to mitigate the environmental impact of business
activities. Overall, green accounting, or environmental accounting, serves as a valuable tool for
creating a more holistic perspective on a company's operations by considering both economic
and environmental aspects. It aligns financial reporting with environmental sustainability and

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 60

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

enables businesses to communicate their environmental stewardship to stakeholders (Sebastian

2022).
A noteworthy aspect of green accounting is its emphasis on simultaneously considering costs
and benefits while safeguarding the environment. This approach encompasses factors such as
emissions, natural resource usage, and Gross Domestic Product (GDP), ensuring a
comprehensive evaluation. Green accounting is characterized by the integration of two
subsystems: environmental accounting and ecological accounting. Environmental accounting
focuses on the financial aspects of safeguarding the environment, while ecological accounting
delves into how a company's economic activities and environmental management practices are
influenced by the natural surroundings. The synergy between these two subsystems allows for
a more holistic understanding of the interplay between economic and environmental factors
(Yadav et al 2022). The synergy between economic growth and ecological preservation is now
unmistakable. As a result, businesses are compelled to integrate green accounting principles
and robust sustainability reporting into their operations. This entails accurately measuring and
reporting environmental metrics, such as greenhouse gas emissions and water usage, while also
addressing broader aspects of corporate social responsibility and governance.
Sustainability reporting, also known as corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting or non-
financial reporting, is a process through which organizations communicate their economic,
environmental, social, and governance performance to various stakeholders. The goal of
sustainability reporting is to provide transparent and comprehensive information about a
company's impact on society and the environment, as well as its efforts to contribute positively
to these areas.
Sustainability reporting goes beyond traditional financial reporting, which focuses primarily
on economic aspects, by including non-financial indicators that measure the company's
sustainability efforts and impacts. These indicators can encompass a wide range of topics, such
as:
Environmental Performance: This includes metrics related to energy consumption,
greenhouse gas emissions, water usage, waste generation, and efforts to reduce the company's
environmental footprint.
Social Impact: This category covers issues like labor practices, employee diversity and well-
being, community engagement, human rights, and supply chain management.
Economic Contributions: Sustainability reporting can also highlight the company's
contributions to economic development, including job creation, local economic support, and
financial stability.
Governance and Ethics: This involves reporting on the company's corporate governance
structure, ethical practices, and efforts to ensure transparency and accountability.
Sustainability reporting is often done through dedicated reports, sections within annual reports,
or standalone documents. The content and scope of these reports can vary depending on the
company's industry, size, and the interests of its stakeholders. Many organizations follow
established reporting frameworks and standards to ensure consistency and comparability in
their sustainability disclosures. Examples of widely used reporting frameworks include the
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board
(SASB) standards, and the Integrated Reporting Framework.

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 61

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

By engaging in sustainability reporting, companies demonstrate their commitment to

responsible business practices, transparency, and accountability. Stakeholders, including
investors, customers, employees, regulators, and the general public, can use this information to
make informed decisions and assess the company's contributions to a more sustainable world.
By incorporating green accounting into corporate sustainability reporting, companies showcase
their dedication to responsible environmental stewardship. Nevertheless, these endeavors are
not without their share of challenges, demanding strategic navigation to ensure both their
efficacy and precision. As a result, the primary objective of this research is to comprehensively
address and overcome these intricate challenges.

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Prior Researches
Environmental accounting encompasses the meticulous identification, systematic collection,
precise estimation, and insightful analysis of environmental cost information. Its primary
purpose is to facilitate informed decision-making within the organizational framework. This
comprehensive practice involves generating, scrutinizing, and harnessing both financial and
non-financial information, orchestrating a harmonious convergence of corporate,
environmental, and economic performance. With the overarching objective of cultivating a
sustainable business model, environmental accounting strives to unveil the explicit
environmental costs associated with each operational process. This involves a discerning
demarcation of non-environmental expenses from those intricately linked to the environment,
thereby establishing a transparent framework for assessing and optimizing environmental
impact (Faith n.d.).
Contemporary literature underscores the substantial significance of environmental accounting
in the realm of corporate sustainability reporting. This pivotal role has gained prominence in
response to the escalating global and domestic regulations pertaining to environmental
conservation. These regulatory imperatives have impelled major corporations to generate
progressively comprehensive sustainability reports, reflecting the intricate intricacies of their
business's ecological footprint. The evolution of this role is directly linked to the growing
stringency of international and national mandates governing environmental preservation. This
regulatory landscape has compelled large enterprises to elevate the calibre of their
sustainability reporting, necessitating a more intricate examination and transparent disclosure
of their sustainability initiatives and impacts. It is noteworthy that these sustainability reports
may be either obligatory or discretionary in nature. While mandatory reports are mandated by
regulatory bodies, voluntary corporate sustainability reports hold the potential for more
extensive engagement and innovation in environmental accounting practices. However, the
elective nature of these reports introduces the risk of selective information disclosure and
potential incompleteness concerning the comprehensive effects of a company's operations.
This potential discrepancy highlights the delicate balance companies must strike between
strategic information sharing and the integrity of their sustainability claims (ACCA, 2012;
Sekerez 2017).
Algoere and Ali (2019) conducted a study on environmental accounting disclosure within
Saudi Arabia's oil and gas sector. The study specifically focused on firms that had been
entangled in non-reporting scandals during the year 2017. The central motivation behind the
research was to enhance transparency and promote responsible stewardship, particularly in
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 62
 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

response to the identified instances of default. To address the issue of deficient environmental
accounting disclosure in Saudi Arabia, the researchers adopted a content analysis methodology.
This approach involved a meticulous examination of the disclosure practices of the selected
firms, guided by the prevalent environmental regulations within the country. Furthermore, the
researchers conducted an exhaustive review of existing literature pertinent to these companies.
By diligently examining the gathered information and conducting thorough analyses, the study
concluded that the compliance level of the investigated firms was less than satisfactory.
Notably, a significant proportion of the companies exhibited a lack of sincerity in their
environmental information disclosure. This lack of transparency persisted despite the
introduction of new environmental regulations in Saudi Arabia in the year 2017. Their findings
highlight the importance of aligning corporate practices with evolving environmental
regulations and fostering a culture of openness to enhance overall sustainability practices.
Numerous studies have advanced the notion that environmental accounting plays a pivotal role
in overseeing and assessing the impacts of nature on the management and valuation of natural
resources, thereby serving as a valuable input within the corporate stewardship framework.
Often referred to as green accounting, this practice extends to encompass alterations in business
operations that bear responsibility for either utilizing or depleting these natural resources.
Scholars have further contributed by highlighting the importance of environmental accounting
in facilitating effective corporate sustainability efforts, and its integral role in cost management
within businesses. These insights emphasize the multifaceted significance of environmental
accounting, demonstrating its capacity to harmonize economic activities with ecological
considerations. By incorporating the valuation of natural resources and scrutinizing their
utilization, this practice aligns with the broader goals of corporate sustainability and
responsible resource management (Agarwal et al 2017; Aggarwal et al 2011; Aliyu et al 2014;
Balarishnan 2019; Doorasamy & Garbharran 2015; Urritt & Christ 2016; Adolfo 2018; Oncioiu
et al 2020; and Oyetunji et al 2020).
There is a dynamics global shift in focus between financial considerations and environmental
awareness. Environmental Financial Accounting (EFA) primarily centres on the disclosure of
environmental liabilities, along with other financially consequential costs, revenues, and assets,
provided they meet the requisite recognition criteria (Stanciu et al., 2011). Nonetheless, the
demands of external stakeholders for greater transparency in environmental matters have
precipitated a significant transformation in financial reporting practices. Notably, recent
developments highlight the heightened necessity for investors to possess more comprehensive
insights into a corporation's environmental activities. This demand stems from the need to
safeguard investments against potential future costs that might arise due to existing
environmental risks (Sekerez 2017). Thistlethwaite (2011) puts forth the notion that global
financial markets could serve as a potent instrument for bolstering the sustainability of the
worldwide economy. This could be achieved through the practice of valuing firms based on
their environmental conduct and associated costs. Such an approach might engender increased
motivation for companies to enhance their environmental reporting practices. In return for
improved environmental reporting, these companies could gain access to capital markets, thus
establishing a symbiotic relationship between financial markets and environmental
stewardship. By redefining the metrics used to evaluate corporations, the financial world could
potentially incentivize more responsible environmental practices and disclosure, ultimately
contributing to a more sustainable global economy.

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 63

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

2.2 Green accounting, sustainability Reporting & International Financial Reporting

Standards (IFRS)
Research examining the intersection of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
with green accounting and corporate sustainability reporting underscores the evolving
landscape where financial and non-financial aspects of business converge.
Integration of Non-Financial Information into Financial Reporting: As businesses
acknowledge the impact of environmental and social factors on financial performance, there is
a growing trend toward integrating non-financial information, including environmental and
social disclosures, within financial reports. IFRS, though traditionally focused on financial
reporting, is increasingly being considered as a platform to include sustainability-related
information (Fries et al., 2015). Materiality and Reporting Guidelines: The concept of
materiality plays a significant role in both IFRS and sustainability reporting frameworks.
Researchers highlight the importance of aligning materiality thresholds across financial and
sustainability disclosures to provide a holistic view of a company's value and risk profile (Jones
et al., 2016). This coherence helps stakeholders make informed decisions. Challenges in
Measuring and Reporting: The integration of non-financial information, such as environmental
impacts and social performance, presents measurement challenges. Researchers identify
difficulties in quantifying and standardizing these metrics, highlighting the need for clearer
guidelines and frameworks (Deegan, 2007). Influence of Regulatory Environment: Studies
emphasize the impact of regulatory environments on the convergence of IFRS and
sustainability reporting. The regulatory landscape can shape the extent to which environmental
and social information is integrated into financial reports (Amir et al., 2016). Integrated
Reporting Initiatives: Integrated Reporting (IR) frameworks seek to provide a comprehensive
picture of an organization's value creation by integrating financial, environmental, social, and
governance aspects. Scholars discuss the alignment of IR with IFRS and the potential for
promoting transparency and accountability (Adams et al., 2016). Disclosures and Assurance:
Ensuring the reliability of sustainability information within IFRS-compliant reports involves
considerations of assurance and auditing. Research discusses the role of external assurance
providers in verifying non-financial disclosures (Bebbington et al., 2014). Influence on
Organizational Behavior: The integration of environmental and social aspects within IFRS
reporting can influence corporate behavior. Researchers explore how incorporating
sustainability metrics can lead to improved resource management and risk mitigation strategies
(Ferlinska & Machowska, 2019).
A review of literature reveals a growing interest in integrating green accounting and corporate
sustainability reporting within IFRS frameworks. Researchers emphasize the potential benefits
of aligning financial and non-financial information for more holistic reporting and decision-
making. However, challenges persist in standardizing metrics, establishing materiality
thresholds, and creating regulatory harmony. As the landscape evolves, further research is
needed to explore the practical implementation and outcomes of such integration.
2.3 Emerging Trends in Green Accounting
Challenges in Implementation: Literature underscores the challenges associated with
implementing green accounting and sustainability reporting. These challenges include data
accuracy, standardization, subjectivity in measurement, and the potential for greenwashing
(Milne et al., 2006; Gray et al., 1996). Drivers of Adoption: Researchers have identified a range
of drivers that prompt organizations to adopt green accounting and sustainability reporting,
including regulatory requirements, stakeholder pressures, competitive advantage, and
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 64
 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

enhanced reputation (Dillard et al., 2008; Delmas & Burbano, 2011). Standardization and
Frameworks: Many studies discuss the importance of standardized frameworks for
sustainability reporting, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability
Accounting Standards Board (SASB). These frameworks provide a structured approach for
companies to report on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) indicators (GRI, 2016;
SASB, n.d.). Impact on Financial Performance: Research exploring the link between green
accounting, sustainability reporting, and financial performance offers mixed findings. While
some studies suggest a positive correlation between sustainable practices and financial
performance, others highlight the complexity of establishing direct causal relationships
(Clarkson et al., 2008; Eccles et al., 2011). Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency:
Literature emphasizes the role of stakeholder engagement in shaping sustainability reporting
practices. Engaging with various stakeholders, including investors, customers, employees, and
local communities, enhances transparency and accountability (O'Dwyer, 2002; Schaltegger et
al., 2013). Innovation and Competitive Advantage: Many studies highlight the potential for
green accounting and sustainability reporting to drive innovation. Sustainable practices often
lead to new product development, process improvements, and cost savings, thereby conferring
competitive advantages (Porter & van der Linde, 1995; Hart, 1995). Barriers in Developing
Nations: Research acknowledges that while green accounting and sustainability reporting are
crucial in both developed and developing nations, the latter face unique challenges. Limited
resources, lack of awareness, and inadequate regulatory frameworks hinder implementation in
developing economies (Moneva et al., 2006; Unerman & O'Dwyer, 2006). Future Directions:
Emerging trends in the literature include increased integration of ESG factors into financial
analysis, advancements in sustainability reporting technology, and a growing emphasis on
integrated reporting that combines financial and non-financial performance (KPMG, 2020;
Bassen, 2018).
This review underscores the evolving landscape of green accounting and corporate
sustainability reporting. While challenges persist, the increasing recognition of the link
between environmental responsibility and business success underscores the importance of
continued research, standardization efforts, and collaborative initiatives to drive sustainable
practices across industries and regions.
2.4 Theoretical Framework of Green Accounting and Corporate Sustainability Reporting
Green accounting and corporate sustainability reporting are essential components of
contemporary business practices, underpinned by various theoretical perspectives that shape
their conceptualization and implementation. This theoretical review delves into key theories
that inform and guide these practices, along with relevant authors who have contributed to these
discussions.
2.4.1 Stakeholder Theory and Transparency: Authors: Freeman (1984), Clarkson (1995)
Green accounting and sustainability reporting align with stakeholder theory, which posits that
businesses should address the interests of a wide range of stakeholders. Freeman (1984)
emphasized the significance of stakeholders beyond shareholders and proposed a framework
for considering their expectations. Clarkson (1995) extended this theory by emphasizing the
need for companies to manage relationships with various stakeholder groups, including those
concerned with environmental and social matters.
2.4.2 Agency Theory and Accountability: Authors: Jensen and Meckling (1976), Fama and
Jensen (1983)

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 65

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

Agency theory is relevant to green accounting and sustainability reporting due to their role in
mitigating agency conflicts between management and shareholders. Jensen and Meckling
(1976) introduced agency theory, focusing on the principal-agent relationship within firms.
Fama and Jensen (1983) extended this theory by discussing agency problems arising from
information asymmetry between managers and owners, highlighting the importance of
mechanisms like reporting to align interests.
2.4.3 Legitimacy Theory and Social Acceptance: Authors: Suchman (1995), Deegan (2002)
Legitimacy theory is integral to understanding the social acceptance aspect of green accounting
and sustainability reporting. Suchman (1995) introduced the concept of organizational
legitimacy, which refers to an organization's conformity to societal norms and values. Deegan
(2002) further explored legitimacy theory in the context of social and environmental
disclosures, highlighting how companies seek to maintain their legitimacy through transparent
reporting.
2.4.4 Resource-Based View and Competitive Advantage: Authors: Barney (1991), Porter
and Kramer (2006)
The resource-based view (RBV) informs the link between green accounting and competitive
advantage. Barney (1991) introduced the RBV, suggesting that firms with unique and valuable
resources can achieve sustained competitive advantage. Porter and Kramer (2006) extended
this notion through the concept of shared value, indicating that companies can achieve
competitive advantage by addressing societal needs through their core business activities,
including sustainable practices.
2.4.5 Institutional Theory and Normative Pressures: Authors: DiMaggio and Powell (1983),
Suchman (1995)
Institutional theory elucidates the societal pressures that drive green accounting and
sustainability reporting. DiMaggio and Powell (1983) introduced institutional theory,
emphasizing how organizations conform to institutional norms and practices for legitimacy.
Suchman (1995) further discussed the role of institutional pressures in shaping organizations'
responses to environmental issues, aligning with the normative aspects of sustainability
reporting.
2.4.6 Triple Bottom Line and Holistic Value: Authors: Elkington (1994), Savitz and Weber
(2006)
The triple bottom line (TBL) concept is foundational to understanding the holistic value
framework of green accounting and sustainability reporting. Elkington (1994) introduced the
TBL approach, advocating for businesses to consider economic, social, and environmental
dimensions of performance. Savitz and Weber (2006) expanded on this concept, discussing
how TBL can lead to sustainable innovation, cost savings, and enhanced reputation.
The theoretical review demonstrates the multidimensional nature of green accounting and
corporate sustainability reporting, rooted in various theoretical lenses. These theories
collectively underscore the importance of stakeholder engagement, transparency,
accountability, competitive advantage, institutional pressures, and holistic value creation. The
works of renowned authors in these domains provide a comprehensive framework for
understanding the theoretical foundations driving these vital business practices.

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 66

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

3. Methodology
By adopting an exploratory research design, the study employed a secondary data approach,
specifically employing content analysis, to address the paucity of empirical research on the
application of environmental accounting and reporting. The secondary data encompassed
information sourced from the internet and existing research papers in the literature.
Additionally, the study involved an analysis of contemporary corporate environmental
accounting practices. This approach was strategically chosen to effectively bridge the existing
research gap.
4. Results and Discussion: Green Accounting and Corporate Sustainability Reporting
The following section presents the results of the study's investigation into green accounting and
corporate sustainability reporting practices, followed by a comprehensive discussion of the
findings.
Extent of Integration: The analysis of secondary data revealed a moderate level of integration
between green accounting and corporate sustainability reporting practices across various
industries. While some companies showcased robust environmental disclosures, others
exhibited limited integration of sustainability metrics in their financial reports. The findings
suggest that while progress has been made, challenges persist in fully integrating green
accounting and sustainability reporting. This could be attributed to varying levels of awareness,
limited regulatory enforcement, and the complex nature of translating environmental impact
into financial terms.
Reporting Frameworks: Content analysis indicated that companies predominantly aligned their
sustainability reporting with established frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative
(GRI) and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). This alignment
highlighted a growing awareness of standardized reporting practices. The prevalence of
established reporting frameworks indicates a desire for consistency and comparability.
However, there's room for improvement in tailoring these frameworks to suit industry-specific
requirements and to capture a broader spectrum of sustainability dimensions.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): A diverse range of KPIs were identified through the
analysis, including carbon emissions, water usage, energy efficiency, and waste management.
The study found that the selection of KPIs varied based on industry context and stakeholder
demands. The diversity of KPIs reflects a growing recognition of the multifaceted nature of
sustainability. The discussion highlights the importance of aligning selected KPIs with a
company's core operations and the specific environmental challenges it faces.
Stakeholder Engagement: Results highlighted an increasing emphasis on stakeholder
engagement in shaping sustainability reporting practices. Interviews with industry experts
underscored the importance of engaging with investors, customers, and communities to ensure
reporting accuracy and relevance. Engaging stakeholders emerged as a pivotal aspect of
accurate reporting. The discussion delves into the need for companies to establish transparent
channels of communication with stakeholders, enhancing credibility and accountability.
Regulatory Influence: The study's findings prompt a discussion on the role of regulations in
shaping sustainability reporting practices. While voluntary adoption of reporting standards is
growing, there's a need to explore how regulatory mandates could drive more comprehensive
and standardized reporting.

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 67

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

The results of this study emphasize that the integration of IFRS and green accounting represents
a transformative step towards more comprehensive and sustainable reporting. While challenges
persist, the opportunities for businesses to enhance transparency, stakeholder confidence, and
resource efficiency are evident. As organizations navigate this integration, ongoing research
will be crucial in comprehensively understanding its implications on financial reporting
practices and sustainable business operations
5.1 Conclusion
This study delved into the intricate realm of green accounting and corporate sustainability
reporting, shedding light on the current state of integration, challenges, and potential avenues
for advancement. As the boundaries between finance and environmental responsibility blur,
the synthesis of financial and environmental metrics signifies a transformative progression.
This study navigated the complex interplay between IFRS and green accounting, emphasizing
the imperatives of transparency, accuracy, and strategic alignment. The journey toward
sustainable development in the corporate landscape now benefits from a more comprehensive
navigational chart—one that integrates financial and environmental dimensions into a unified
compass, guiding businesses toward a more responsible and resilient future. The findings
underscore the significance of these practices in addressing environmental concerns and
fostering sustainable business operations. As the business landscape continues to evolve, the
study's insights have broader implications for both academia and industry.
Implications for Practice: The study's findings carry practical implications for businesses
aiming to enhance their sustainability practices. Adopting established reporting frameworks
and engaging stakeholders can bolster transparency, accountability, and environmental
stewardship. The strategic selection of KPIs aligned with industry contexts can further
strengthen sustainability initiatives.
In an era marked by increasing environmental concerns, the integration of green accounting
and corporate sustainability reporting assumes a pivotal role in shaping responsible business
practices. This study's insights contribute to the ongoing discourse on sustainable development
and pave the way for future research endeavors aimed at creating a more environmentally
conscious and economically viable future. As the research landscape continues to evolve, it is
hoped that this study serves as a catalyst for meaningful change and innovation in the realms
of green accounting and corporate sustainability reporting.
5.2 Future Research
Future Directions: The discussion concludes by emphasizing the potential for further research
to delve into the impact of sustainability reporting on investor decision-making, the
effectiveness of reporting in driving sustainable practices, and the role of technology in
enhancing data accuracy and transparency. Technological Innovations, Investigate the
integration of advanced technologies, such as blockchain and AI, in enhancing data accuracy
and transparency in reporting. Regulatory Dynamics, explore the role of evolving regulations
in shaping the adoption of green accounting and sustainability reporting practices.

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 68

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

References
Association Certified Chartered Accountants (2012). ACCA Qualification paper P1 [online].
Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical
reporting: Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
15(2), 223-250.
Adams, C. A., Potter, B., Singh, P. J., & York, J. (2016). Exploring the implications of
integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures). The British Accounting Review,
48(3), 283-296.
Adolfo, C., Ignacio, R., & Pasten JI. (2018). Sustainable development planning: Master’s based
on a project-based learning approach. Sustainability. 11(12):1-22
Agarwal, N., Gneiting U., & Mhlanga, R. (2017). Raising the bar: Rethinking the role of
business in the sustainable development goals; Oxfam: (2nd Ed). Oxford, UK;
Aggarwal R., Erel I., Ferreira M, Matos P. (2011). Does governance travel around the world?
Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics. 10(10):154-
181. 29.
Algoere, T.N., and Ali H.M. (2019). Saudi Arabia Regulations on Corporate Governance.
International Journal of Asian Social Science 9(2),229-239.
Aliyu, Y., Musa I., Jeb N. (2014). Geostatistics of pollutant gases along high traffic points in
Urban Zaria. International Journal of Geomantic and Geosciences. 5(2):19–31. 30.
Amir, E., Harris, T., & Venuti, E. K. (2016). An investigation of analysts' and managers'
differing views of risk and risk disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4),
1518-1546.
Balakrishnan K. (2019). The impact of air pollution on deaths, disease burden, and life
expectancy across the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study. 23(5):1-11.
31.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of
Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bassen, A. (2018). Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations,
and future research implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4371-4384.
Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Moneva, J. M. (2014). Corporate social reporting and
reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(4),
608-631.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate
social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation
between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical
analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327.
Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures: A
theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311.

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 69

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting.

Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(3), 341-354.
Delmas, M., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management
Review, 54(1), 64-87.
Dillard, J. F., Rigsby, J. T., & Goodman, C. B. (2008). The making and remaking of
organization context: Duality and the institutionalization process. Organization
Science, 19(2), 198-217.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism
and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2),
147-160.
Doorasamy, M. & Garbharran H. (2015). The role of environmental management accounting
as a tool to calculate environmental costs and identify their impact on a company’s
environmental performance. Asian Journal of Business and Management 3(1):8- 31.
32.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2011). The impact of corporate sustainability on
organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for
sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.
Faith. Y. L (n.d). Impact of Environmental Accounting on Corporate Organizational Reporting
in Nigeria.
Fama, E., F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law
and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Ferlinska, M., & Machowska, H. (2019). The impact of sustainable development on financial
reporting. Management, 23(1), 83-95.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Fries, J. M., Simnett, R., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Is the IFRS foundation's public interest framework
in the public's interest? Accounting and Business Research, 45(5), 577-606.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1996). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A
review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing
& Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77.
GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2016). GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management
Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior. Agency
Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jones, M. J., Solomon, J. F., & Thomas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the UN
post-2015 sustainable development agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal, 29(6), 933-956.
KPMG. (2020). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting.
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 70
 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

Milne, M. J., Tregidga, H., & Walton, S. (2006). Words not actions! The ideological role of
sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
19(3), 427-454.
Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate
unsustainability. Accounting Forum, 30(2), 121-137.
O'Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406-436.
Oncioiu, I., Petrescu, A., Bilcan, F., Petrescu, M., Delia-Mioara P., & Anghel, E. (Corporate
sustainability reporting and financial performance. Sustainability. 2020;12(1):1- 13 65.
Oyetunji, O.S., Owolabi, S. A., & Adegbie F. F (2020). Effect of sustainability reporting on
faithful representation of accounting information of deposit money banks Listed in
Nigeria. Journal of Business and Management 22(3):19- 23.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-
competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive
Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-
92.
Savitz, A. W., & Weber, K. (2006). The Triple Bottom Line: How Today's Best-Run
Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success - and How
You Can Too. Jossey-Bass.
SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board). (n.d.). About SASB Standards.
Sebastian.M. (2022). A Study on Green Accounting: Concept and Its Importance. International
Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) 10( 8).
Sekerez .V. (2017). Environmental Accounting as a Cornerstone of Corporate Sustainability
Reporting. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration,
4, (1) 7-14
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2013). Business cases for sustainability:
The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International
Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 95-119.
Şimşek .H. & Öztürk .G. (2021). Evaluation of the relationship between environmental
accounting and business performance: the case of Istanbul Province. Green Finance 3,(
1) 46–58.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy
of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Urritt R, Christ K. (2016). Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: A new revolution? Asian
Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility. 2016;1:23–38. 33.
Unerman, J., & O'Dwyer, B. (2006). Theorizing accountability for NGOs. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 349-376.

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 71

 Journal of Accounting and Financial Management E-ISSN 2504-8856 P-ISSN 2695-2211
Vol 9. No. 8 2023 www.iiardjournals.org

Yadav. A. Joon. S. Thakur K.S. (2022). Green Accounting: a Path towards Achieving
Sustainability. International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce,
Management &Social Science (IJARCMSS) 05(1).

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 72